SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 4
‘FORUM FOR INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEGAL PROFESSION’
( FITALP )
(Established: 28th
Day of September, 2009)
Supreme Court of India Premises, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 (India)
MOST URGENT
Ajay Pratap Sharma
013, Satya Marg
Advocate, Supreme Court of India
ChanakyaPuri,
President, FITALP
New Delhi-110021
Life Member : Bar Association of India
Senior Member : Delhi High Court Bar Association
Member : Indian Society of International Law
Member : Supreme Court Bar Association
No. FITALP / 1 August 26, 2014
Hon’ble Mr. Justice RM Lodha,
Chief Justice of India (Administrative Jurisdiction)
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Strict Enforcement of - “ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF
CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 “
1. The Forum ‘ FORUM FOR INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY IN
LEGAL PROFESSION’, which was established on 28.9.2009, stands for Integrity,
Transparency and Accountability in Legal Profession – which includes the Bench & the
Bar both and to fulfill its Aims & Objects, the Forum (‘FITALP‘ ) is persistently
approaching the Hon’ble CJI & other Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court through its
letters, indicating important issues which require Immediate attention and action.
2. That, in the Chief Justices Conference held in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
1999, the Resolution “ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF
CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 ”
was adopted with the Object to “..serve as a guide to be Observed by Judges, essential
for an independent, strong and respected Judiciary, indispensible in the impartial
administration of justice..”. The Forum, through its letter dated 6th.
December, 2010,
brought the said Resolution of 1999 in the Notice of Hon’ble CJI & other Hon’ble Judges
of the Supreme Court of India for appreciation and Implementation as it would bring
Transparency, Respectability and Impartiality in the eyes of the ‘ Common Man- WE, The
People of India’. Para 1 to 16 of the said ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’, are Binding but,
the same are Not being accepted and followed Rigidly and the Forum feels that it may be
the reason that the ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’ feels that there is lack of
FITALPFITALP
Transparency,Respectability and Impartiality. The copy of the aforesaid ‘Code of Conduct
of 1999’ is enclosed for ready reference.
3. That, In this regard, extracts from Forum’s Circular dated 11.11.2009 - which are relevent,
are reproduced below for information and Appreciation:
“ The ‘Emblem of Blind folded Lady’ indicates, in Unequivocal terms, that Judiciary is to be
Impartial & Blind. Whenever, it is seen that, the Hon’ble Judges or the Presiding Officers are
Freely attending Private Functions of a Group of Advocates, who are Economically Very Well-
Off or who are controlling the Bar Association and on the other hand, they have No Time to
accept the request of Junior or Not so- Economically well Off Advocates, this gives a Very
Shocking Impression and rather demoralization to Common Poor Litigants and other
Advocates. The Common Men are - ‘WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA.’ and therefore,
Constitutionally their Rightful Feelings cannot be ignored by the ‘Public Servants’. There are
certain Compulsions and Judicial Traditions of maintaining Aloofness- which is the Golden
Principle to Display Impartiality and Inspire Confidence amongst the Bar and the Litigants. It
requires Immediate consideration by the Hon’ble CJI and Hon’ble Judges of Supreme Court of
India and their Decision will have Impact on whole Judicial System of the Country.”
4. The Forum- while discharging its responsibility to bring Integrity, Transparency and
Accountability in the Legal Profession, sent their letter dated 25.1.2011 addressed to Hon’ble
Mr. Justice SH Kapadia, CJI when the Hon’ble CJI allowed issuance of Invitation cards for
High Tea from his side and in his name in the capacity of President of a Society constituted by
Mr. PH Parekh, senior Advocate, of which Mr. PH Parekh was Secretary General and which
operates from Mr. Parekh’s chamber. The Executive Committee of the said Society consists of
10 senior Advocates who were practicing in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Mr. PH
Parekh also made Hon’ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir– the senior- most and No.2 Judge of the
Supreme Court, Vice President of the said Society. It was a very Serious matter as it Infringed
Para / Condition no. 3 of the ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’, Further, it definitely sent Wrong
signal to the ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’. Copy of the Forum letter is enclosed.
5. The Forum also feels that in view of the Provisions of the Code of Conduct of 1999, there
does not seem any Justification whatsoever of accepting Lavish Farewell Party in a 5- Star
Hotel from the side of AOR Association at the time of retirement of Hon’ble CJI and Judges
when a traditional, simple Farewell Function had been organised by the SCBA which
represents the whole community of Advocates practicisng in the Supreme Court. Similarly,
the practice of inviting Selected Chosen Advocates in the Party organised by a retiring
Hon’ble CJI and Justice of Supreme Court for his Colleagues, also Violates the Code of
Conduct of 1999 and Now Especially when the Collegium of the Supreme Court is Appointiing
Judges directly to the Hon’ble Supreme Court from Advocates practicing in the Supreme
Court. The Forum has full Confidence that the Hon’ble CJI will take note and Discontinue this
practice which directly Violates the Code of Conduct of 1999.
6. The Forum feels that it was the darkest day in the history of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India when Attorney General, Adl. Solicitor General and other Senior Advocate – who are
practicing Advocates of the Supreme Court, filed Petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India for action against retired Senior Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India-
Hon’ble Mr. Justice AK Ganguly and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, for Sexual
Harassment and even gave Public statements, when they are supposed to be aware that the
normal law viz. Cr. PC and IPC will be applicable in the cases and approaching the Apex Court
will definitely influence the normal Investigations and Trial- if any, besides causing
embarrassment to the Apex Court and the Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of India. The
Forum feels that it was only because of Non- acceptance and Non- adherence of the ‘CODE
OF CONDUCT of 1999’ especially Para 3 of the said Code of Conduct of 1999 for Hon’ble
Judges. The Hon’ble Judges have no option but to keep Aloofness- as required, to bring
Transparency, Respectability and Impartiality.
7. On the basis of the above, the Hon’ble CJI will appreciate that the Acceptance and Strict
Observance of the Code of Conduct - as contained in Para no. 1 to 16 of the said ‘CODE OF
CONDUCT of 1999’, has become Imperative for bringing Transparency, Respectability and
Impartiality in the eyes of ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’ and therefore, Hon’ble CJI
may take necessary steps immediately as the Forum is confident that the Code of Conduct
can be Implemented Strictly and Effectively by you during your tenure as the Hon’ble CJI.
8. The Forum also appeals to all members of the Bar, through this letter, that they should
honour and also, keep in view the Compulsions of the Hon’ble Judges as required under the
“ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE
CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 ” to ensure “..an independent, strong
and respected Judiciary, indispensible in the impartial administration of Justice..”
Encls : As above
(AJAY PRATAP SHARMA)
Copy forwarded to :
1. All Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Secretary General, Supreme Court of India- For Information of Hon’ble CJI & All
Hon’ble Judges of Supreme Court of India.
(AJAY PRATAP SHARMA)
FITALP-26082014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability in Legal Profession

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Bar council of india
Bar council of indiaBar council of india
Bar council of indiaBhawna Sharma
 
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyers
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyersrole of BCI for combact deviance by lawyers
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyersChaitanya Limbachiya
 
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of Advocate
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of AdvocateAdmission, Enrolment & Rights of Advocate
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of AdvocateBhargav Dangar
 
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISH
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISHLLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISH
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISHKanoon Ke Rakhwale India
 
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rules
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rulesLetter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rules
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rulessanjeev kumar chaswal
 
Professional ethics unit i
Professional ethics unit iProfessional ethics unit i
Professional ethics unit ianjalidixit21
 
The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961Leo Lukose
 

La actualidad más candente (11)

Bar council of india
Bar council of indiaBar council of india
Bar council of india
 
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyers
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyersrole of BCI for combact deviance by lawyers
role of BCI for combact deviance by lawyers
 
Legal Ethics 2nd lecture
Legal Ethics 2nd lectureLegal Ethics 2nd lecture
Legal Ethics 2nd lecture
 
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of Advocate
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of AdvocateAdmission, Enrolment & Rights of Advocate
Admission, Enrolment & Rights of Advocate
 
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISH
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISHLLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISH
LLB LAW PROFESSIONAL ETHICS PROJECT FILE IN ENGLISH
 
Fitalp 07122009 Aor
Fitalp 07122009 AorFitalp 07122009 Aor
Fitalp 07122009 Aor
 
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rules
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rulesLetter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rules
Letter to copy right office for amedment of copyright rules
 
Professional ethics unit i
Professional ethics unit iProfessional ethics unit i
Professional ethics unit i
 
The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961The advocates act,1961
The advocates act,1961
 
const of sacoswu[1]
const of sacoswu[1]const of sacoswu[1]
const of sacoswu[1]
 
India a democracy or krytocracy-140520-to cji
India a democracy or krytocracy-140520-to cjiIndia a democracy or krytocracy-140520-to cji
India a democracy or krytocracy-140520-to cji
 

Destacado

Destacado (20)

La plenitud del ser divino equipo 5 exposición 4
La plenitud del ser divino equipo 5 exposición 4La plenitud del ser divino equipo 5 exposición 4
La plenitud del ser divino equipo 5 exposición 4
 
Doble modo de verdad en lo que confesamos de dios.
Doble modo de verdad en lo que confesamos de dios.Doble modo de verdad en lo que confesamos de dios.
Doble modo de verdad en lo que confesamos de dios.
 
earthquake.gem or readline.so
earthquake.gem or readline.soearthquake.gem or readline.so
earthquake.gem or readline.so
 
A sesión cuerpo 7
A sesión cuerpo 7A sesión cuerpo 7
A sesión cuerpo 7
 
Comparble final
Comparble finalComparble final
Comparble final
 
Report elife - Blogueiros e Orkutianos
Report elife - Blogueiros e OrkutianosReport elife - Blogueiros e Orkutianos
Report elife - Blogueiros e Orkutianos
 
3 er weekend volkswagen 5
3 er weekend volkswagen 53 er weekend volkswagen 5
3 er weekend volkswagen 5
 
Zakat dan ketentuannya
Zakat dan ketentuannyaZakat dan ketentuannya
Zakat dan ketentuannya
 
Angu pdf1
Angu pdf1Angu pdf1
Angu pdf1
 
Mels Professional Profile
Mels Professional ProfileMels Professional Profile
Mels Professional Profile
 
Report elife - Desejos e intenções de compra da blogosfera
Report elife - Desejos e intenções de compra da blogosferaReport elife - Desejos e intenções de compra da blogosfera
Report elife - Desejos e intenções de compra da blogosfera
 
3d sesión atl 4
3d sesión atl 43d sesión atl 4
3d sesión atl 4
 
Team5-Week11
Team5-Week11Team5-Week11
Team5-Week11
 
Rubyで本を買う(香川大学編)
Rubyで本を買う(香川大学編)Rubyで本を買う(香川大学編)
Rubyで本を買う(香川大学編)
 
3b sesión salud 2
3b sesión salud 23b sesión salud 2
3b sesión salud 2
 
Company Profile- Mori Augusto e Adriano snc
Company Profile- Mori Augusto e Adriano snc Company Profile- Mori Augusto e Adriano snc
Company Profile- Mori Augusto e Adriano snc
 
Sarhad conservation strategy
Sarhad conservation strategySarhad conservation strategy
Sarhad conservation strategy
 
Presentation24
Presentation24Presentation24
Presentation24
 
3g unidad
3g unidad3g unidad
3g unidad
 
Alfombras corpus
Alfombras corpusAlfombras corpus
Alfombras corpus
 

Similar a FITALP-26082014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability in Legal Profession

FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...
FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...
FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...AJAY PRATAP SHARMA
 
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rules
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rulesFitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rules
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rulesAJAY PRATAP SHARMA
 
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law studentsAaryaKeshav
 
Uia Al Hassani
Uia  Al HassaniUia  Al Hassani
Uia Al HassaniJLMB
 
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or Reality
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or RealityFinding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or Reality
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or RealityIJMER
 
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and Ors
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and OrsIndira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and Ors
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and OrsAnushka Singh
 
Judicial ethics
Judicial ethicsJudicial ethics
Judicial ethicsPos Tol
 
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457Harsh Kumar
 
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptx
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptxNALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptx
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptxAjayKranthi1
 
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdf
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdfBonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdf
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdfRaynoldNongdhar
 
66th National Law Day Report 2015
66th National Law Day Report 201566th National Law Day Report 2015
66th National Law Day Report 2015Amit Kumar
 
103775261 bar-exam-case
103775261 bar-exam-case103775261 bar-exam-case
103775261 bar-exam-casehomeworkping7
 

Similar a FITALP-26082014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability in Legal Profession (20)

FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...
FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...
FITALP-20112014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability...
 
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rules
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rulesFitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rules
Fitalp 25032017-enforcement of rule of law in sc- sc rules
 
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students
434755403-Upload.pdf practical file to help law students
 
Legal ethics
Legal ethicsLegal ethics
Legal ethics
 
Uia Al Hassani
Uia  Al HassaniUia  Al Hassani
Uia Al Hassani
 
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or Reality
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or RealityFinding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or Reality
Finding Truth: Rendering Justice – A Myth or Reality
 
The Judiciary.pptx
The Judiciary.pptxThe Judiciary.pptx
The Judiciary.pptx
 
CAREER IN SCIENCE, COMMERCIAL LAW & MANAGEMENT
CAREER IN SCIENCE, COMMERCIAL LAW & MANAGEMENTCAREER IN SCIENCE, COMMERCIAL LAW & MANAGEMENT
CAREER IN SCIENCE, COMMERCIAL LAW & MANAGEMENT
 
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and Ors
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and OrsIndira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and Ors
Indira Jai Singh v/s Supreme Court of India through Secretary General and Ors
 
Judicial ethics
Judicial ethicsJudicial ethics
Judicial ethics
 
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457
C. ravichandran iyerv. justice a.m. bhattacharjee (1995) 5 scc 457
 
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptx
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptxNALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptx
NALSAR- Legal Ethics.pptx
 
Print out
Print outPrint out
Print out
 
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdf
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdfBonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdf
Bonnie FOi Law vs BCI.pdf
 
66th National Law Day Report 2015
66th National Law Day Report 201566th National Law Day Report 2015
66th National Law Day Report 2015
 
PIL NJAC
PIL NJACPIL NJAC
PIL NJAC
 
interpretation of statutes
interpretation of statutesinterpretation of statutes
interpretation of statutes
 
103775261 bar-exam-case
103775261 bar-exam-case103775261 bar-exam-case
103775261 bar-exam-case
 
MISIÓN A KIRGUISTÁN
MISIÓN A KIRGUISTÁNMISIÓN A KIRGUISTÁN
MISIÓN A KIRGUISTÁN
 
CONTEMPT OF THE COURT
CONTEMPT OF THE COURT CONTEMPT OF THE COURT
CONTEMPT OF THE COURT
 

FITALP-26082014- CJI-Code of Conduct for Judges-Transparency & Accountability in Legal Profession

  • 1. ‘FORUM FOR INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEGAL PROFESSION’ ( FITALP ) (Established: 28th Day of September, 2009) Supreme Court of India Premises, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 (India) MOST URGENT Ajay Pratap Sharma 013, Satya Marg Advocate, Supreme Court of India ChanakyaPuri, President, FITALP New Delhi-110021 Life Member : Bar Association of India Senior Member : Delhi High Court Bar Association Member : Indian Society of International Law Member : Supreme Court Bar Association No. FITALP / 1 August 26, 2014 Hon’ble Mr. Justice RM Lodha, Chief Justice of India (Administrative Jurisdiction) Supreme Court of India New Delhi Strict Enforcement of - “ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 “ 1. The Forum ‘ FORUM FOR INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEGAL PROFESSION’, which was established on 28.9.2009, stands for Integrity, Transparency and Accountability in Legal Profession – which includes the Bench & the Bar both and to fulfill its Aims & Objects, the Forum (‘FITALP‘ ) is persistently approaching the Hon’ble CJI & other Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court through its letters, indicating important issues which require Immediate attention and action. 2. That, in the Chief Justices Conference held in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in 1999, the Resolution “ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 ” was adopted with the Object to “..serve as a guide to be Observed by Judges, essential for an independent, strong and respected Judiciary, indispensible in the impartial administration of justice..”. The Forum, through its letter dated 6th. December, 2010, brought the said Resolution of 1999 in the Notice of Hon’ble CJI & other Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of India for appreciation and Implementation as it would bring Transparency, Respectability and Impartiality in the eyes of the ‘ Common Man- WE, The People of India’. Para 1 to 16 of the said ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’, are Binding but, the same are Not being accepted and followed Rigidly and the Forum feels that it may be the reason that the ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’ feels that there is lack of FITALPFITALP
  • 2. Transparency,Respectability and Impartiality. The copy of the aforesaid ‘Code of Conduct of 1999’ is enclosed for ready reference. 3. That, In this regard, extracts from Forum’s Circular dated 11.11.2009 - which are relevent, are reproduced below for information and Appreciation: “ The ‘Emblem of Blind folded Lady’ indicates, in Unequivocal terms, that Judiciary is to be Impartial & Blind. Whenever, it is seen that, the Hon’ble Judges or the Presiding Officers are Freely attending Private Functions of a Group of Advocates, who are Economically Very Well- Off or who are controlling the Bar Association and on the other hand, they have No Time to accept the request of Junior or Not so- Economically well Off Advocates, this gives a Very Shocking Impression and rather demoralization to Common Poor Litigants and other Advocates. The Common Men are - ‘WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA.’ and therefore, Constitutionally their Rightful Feelings cannot be ignored by the ‘Public Servants’. There are certain Compulsions and Judicial Traditions of maintaining Aloofness- which is the Golden Principle to Display Impartiality and Inspire Confidence amongst the Bar and the Litigants. It requires Immediate consideration by the Hon’ble CJI and Hon’ble Judges of Supreme Court of India and their Decision will have Impact on whole Judicial System of the Country.” 4. The Forum- while discharging its responsibility to bring Integrity, Transparency and Accountability in the Legal Profession, sent their letter dated 25.1.2011 addressed to Hon’ble Mr. Justice SH Kapadia, CJI when the Hon’ble CJI allowed issuance of Invitation cards for High Tea from his side and in his name in the capacity of President of a Society constituted by Mr. PH Parekh, senior Advocate, of which Mr. PH Parekh was Secretary General and which operates from Mr. Parekh’s chamber. The Executive Committee of the said Society consists of 10 senior Advocates who were practicing in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Mr. PH Parekh also made Hon’ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir– the senior- most and No.2 Judge of the Supreme Court, Vice President of the said Society. It was a very Serious matter as it Infringed Para / Condition no. 3 of the ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’, Further, it definitely sent Wrong signal to the ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’. Copy of the Forum letter is enclosed. 5. The Forum also feels that in view of the Provisions of the Code of Conduct of 1999, there does not seem any Justification whatsoever of accepting Lavish Farewell Party in a 5- Star Hotel from the side of AOR Association at the time of retirement of Hon’ble CJI and Judges when a traditional, simple Farewell Function had been organised by the SCBA which represents the whole community of Advocates practicisng in the Supreme Court. Similarly, the practice of inviting Selected Chosen Advocates in the Party organised by a retiring Hon’ble CJI and Justice of Supreme Court for his Colleagues, also Violates the Code of Conduct of 1999 and Now Especially when the Collegium of the Supreme Court is Appointiing Judges directly to the Hon’ble Supreme Court from Advocates practicing in the Supreme Court. The Forum has full Confidence that the Hon’ble CJI will take note and Discontinue this practice which directly Violates the Code of Conduct of 1999. 6. The Forum feels that it was the darkest day in the history of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India when Attorney General, Adl. Solicitor General and other Senior Advocate – who are practicing Advocates of the Supreme Court, filed Petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for action against retired Senior Judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India- Hon’ble Mr. Justice AK Ganguly and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, for Sexual Harassment and even gave Public statements, when they are supposed to be aware that the normal law viz. Cr. PC and IPC will be applicable in the cases and approaching the Apex Court will definitely influence the normal Investigations and Trial- if any, besides causing embarrassment to the Apex Court and the Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of India. The Forum feels that it was only because of Non- acceptance and Non- adherence of the ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’ especially Para 3 of the said Code of Conduct of 1999 for Hon’ble Judges. The Hon’ble Judges have no option but to keep Aloofness- as required, to bring Transparency, Respectability and Impartiality. 7. On the basis of the above, the Hon’ble CJI will appreciate that the Acceptance and Strict Observance of the Code of Conduct - as contained in Para no. 1 to 16 of the said ‘CODE OF CONDUCT of 1999’, has become Imperative for bringing Transparency, Respectability and Impartiality in the eyes of ‘Common Man- WE, The People of India’ and therefore, Hon’ble CJI may take necessary steps immediately as the Forum is confident that the Code of Conduct can be Implemented Strictly and Effectively by you during your tenure as the Hon’ble CJI. 8. The Forum also appeals to all members of the Bar, through this letter, that they should honour and also, keep in view the Compulsions of the Hon’ble Judges as required under the “ RESTATEMENT OF VALUES OF JUDICIAL LIFE (CODE OF CONDUCT) ADOPTED IN THE CHIEF JUSTICES’ CONFERENCE IN DECEMBER 1999 ” to ensure “..an independent, strong and respected Judiciary, indispensible in the impartial administration of Justice..”
  • 3. Encls : As above (AJAY PRATAP SHARMA) Copy forwarded to : 1. All Hon’ble Judges of the Supreme Court of India. 2. Secretary General, Supreme Court of India- For Information of Hon’ble CJI & All Hon’ble Judges of Supreme Court of India. (AJAY PRATAP SHARMA)