Domestic violence victims_and_recividism[1]

•Descargar como PPT, PDF•

3 recomendaciones•1,869 vistas

Akvinderk

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

Au Psy492 M7 A2 Evangelista G.Doc

georg29

Uploading video clips to create a movie

B & K Realty, LLC

What Is Domestic Violence?

tmarcy

Nutritional Needs for Toddlers and Children

Vesak day

Nutrition for-kids

Towards Greatness

SXSW 2016 takeaways

TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work

Volker Hirsch

Destacado (9)

Au Psy492 M7 A2 Evangelista G.Doc

Uploading video clips to create a movie

What Is Domestic Violence?

Nutritional Needs for Toddlers and Children

Vesak day

Nutrition for-kids

Towards Greatness

SXSW 2016 takeaways

TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work

Similar a Domestic violence victims_and_recividism[1]

Running head: ASSIGNMENT 3-ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 ASSIGNMENT 3-ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 Assignment 3-Annotated Bibliography Stephanie Rincon Professor Terri Klosek FP6525 | Psychology of the Victim December 26,2018 Assignment 3-Annotated Bibliography Introduction The problem looked into by the paper includes domestic violence victimization. Domestic violence victimization is a serious offense that has for a long time disturbed families, individuals, and the social sectors (Van der Kolk, 2017). Since it touches on family, the most affected individuals comprise of women and children who undergo physical and mental abuse. Most of the known perpetrators of the crime include men who assault their partners. Domestic violence victimization focuses on individuals who are embroiled in a conflict involving a romantic relationship (Anderberg, Rainer, Wadsworth, & Wilson, 2015). Despite having the above factor as a general definition of domestic violence, one has to know that there are several features of domestic violence which are still being discovered while others remain unknown. The discussion looks into women and children as victims who are affected by the crime. It also looks at possible countermeasures to use in dealing with the problem. Presenting Domestic Violence Victimization and Population (Women and Children) The presentation occurs through the discussion of the following literature work: Van der Kolk, B. (2017). Developmental Trauma Disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric annals, 35(5), 401-408. More than 85% of domestic violence victims are women (Van der Kolk, 2017). Those affected falls between the ages of 24 and 25 years. The population of victims includes intimate partners, people sharing a residence, and married couples. Domestic violence victimization affects individuals from diverse ethnicities, socioeconomic backgrounds, ethnicities, and sexual orientation. The connection for domestic violence victimization revolves around the magnitude of trauma it creates on the victims. Victims undergo psychological disturbance since they suffer from the shock that affects them for many years unless they receive the needed attention. Domestic violence victimization occurs on a physical level. It comprises of different abuses that may lead to injury, harm, and damage upon women. Sometimes women fall victims of aggravated physical abuses via deadly weapons used on them to injure them. García-Moreno, C., Hegarty, K., d'Oliveira, A., Koziol-McLain, J., Colombini, M., & Feder, G. (2015). The health-systems response to violence against women. The Lancet, 385(9977),, 1567-1579. It is important to note that domestic violence occurs on emotional and psy.

Running head ASSIGNMENT 3-ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY .docx

toddr4

M3A2 by Jennif er Augustus Submission dat e: 02- Oct- 2017 03:05AM (UT C- 0700) Submission ID: 855766133 File name: DomesticViolenceAgainstWomen.docx (26.89K) Word count : 1229Charact er count : 7085 D Running head: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGANST WOMEN 1 Domestic Violence Against Women Name Institution Date DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGANST WOMEN 2 II Typical IJerpetrator of domestic violence against women a Violence against women can be defined as any act of gender -rel ated violen ce that is likel y to result in or actually results in menta l, se xual, or physical suffering or harm to women including coercion , threats of violent acts or arbitrary depri vation of libert y, whether in private or public life. In some cases, men are abused by partners (Saili, Mahfo z, Labong, & Putit, 2014). However , domestic violence is in most cases directed toward women. Abusive relationships often involve an imbalance of control and power. The perpetrator uses intimidating , hurtful beha viors and words to control their partner (Saili Mahfo z, Labong, & Putit, 2014). It might be easy for one to identify domestic viol ence at initial stages . While some relationships tend to be clearly abusive abuse often begins subtly and worsen over time. Domestic violen ce is about control and power. The perpetrator usua lly wants to dominate the survivor/vict im and wants to secure all the po\ver in the relationship and employs violence to maintain or establish power and authority (Ellsberg , et al., 2015). Perpetrators of domestic violence are often not deranged or sick, but have lea rned, manipulat ive and abusive beha viors and techniques that allow them to control and dominate others and obtain the desired responses (Ellsberg , et al. 2015). In most cases, an abuser will restrict the outlets of a victim , forbidding them from maintaining outside employment family ties and friends . This has an isolating impact , creating dependenc y and leaving victims with no external support. Perpetrators also limit the options of a survivor by disallowing access to credit cards, checking accoun ts, or other sources of financial independence or mone y. There is no typical perpetrator of domestic violence against women , but psychologists have ident ified some characteristics that are common among the perpetrntors (Ellsberg , et al., m 2015). Many perpetra tors of domestic violence against women often suffer from low self-esteem , DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGANST WOMEN 3 and their sense of identity and self is often tied to their partner. Thus, if perpetrators feel the y are somehow losing their victims either through emotional detachment , di vorce , separa tion , or pregnancy (the fear their vic tims will replace love for them with the lo ve for the coup le' s child) , they will lash out (Gracia , 2014). In case victims leave through any of the above-mentioned methods , perpetrators usua lly feel they are losing their self ...

M3A2by Jennif er Augustus.docx

smile790243

Ipv Presentation

cyndin44

Ipv Presentation

cyndin44

Williams Roe Knight Final Poster

Sarah Roe

Intimate Partner Violence: Prevalence, impact, treatment, prevention

Parisa Kaliush

Honors_Thesis_Poster_Presentation1

Marie Elaine Ortega

Running head: Examining the reasons 1 Examining the reasons 16 Case Study: Examining the Reasons Why Women Stay with Their Abusive Male Partner. Domestic violence is quite common in many forms in today’s contemporary society. In fact, domestic violence is more prevalent than it was in the past. In most of the cases of domestic violence, women tend to be victims more than men are. The woman in the relationship is often faced with the hard position of making the decision to leave or not. A number of factors often deter women from making the decision to leave their abusive lovers. These factors are often social/cultural, economic and or psychological (Loveisrespect.org, 2013). They depend on the nature or the status of the relationship and those in it. Topic Domestic Violence Problem Domestic violence is a major social problem. Domestic violence breaks down the society as well create an emotionally unhealthy family foundation. Studies have shown kids who grew up in homes where there was domestic violence tend to grow up to be abusers themselves, or they have the tendencies to stay in abusive relationships. Research Question What are the reasons that women give for choosing to stay in abusive relationships? Purpose By conducting this research study, it will help to narrow down the reasons why the woman stays in the abusive relationship or marriage. The research will better help psychologists to gain a clearer understanding of to handle this specific patient. In addition, the research will help community organizers to create effective programs and resources for the abusive woman. Lived Experience Capturing the lives of women who choose or chose to stay in domestic violence relationship Participant Criteria Females between the ages 18-35, who are in a domestic violence relationship or who has left a domestic violence relationship in the past twelve months. Time Currently in a domestic violence relationship or has left a domestic relationship within the past twelve months. Literature Review Dziegielewski S. F., Campbell K. & Turnage B. F. (2005). Domestic Violence: Focus Groupsfrom the Survivors’ Perspective. Retrieved. The authors did a study to find out why women who were in abusive relationships or were married were unable to leave. To carry out the study they grouped such women into three; the first group consisted of those who had a desire to leave, group two consisted of those women who already had a plan and lastly group three were women who had left and had no expectations of going back. They then asked them to write down the reasons why they had planned as above or could not do as above. The authors found out that the reasons given by the three categories of women had similarity in terms of context. Despite the status to which they already belonged, they had similar reasons for leaving or returning to their relationships. Some of the reasons included fear, limited resources and quite weirdly, some of the women claimed that t.

Running head Examining the reasons 1Examining the reasons 16.docx

charisellington63520

Sexual Assault and PTSD by Laura OBrien

Laura O'Brien

Domestic Violence Powerpoint

DarleneLowrey

Domestic Violence Pp For Soc 610

debbiemcbride

MPA Bystander Poster Final

Kasey Jerioski

Psyc Of Women Presentation

umbcpsych357

FP6540_M5_A2_Larouche_Susan

Susan Larouche

Verbal Abuse

kts80

Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Violence Outcomes Jennifer E. Caldwell, Suzanne C. Swan, and V. Diane Woodbrown University of South Carolina Objective: This paper proposes a conceptual model for gender differences in outcomes of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, broadly conceived as including physical, sexual, emotional, and coercive control forms of abuse, as well as stalking. Method: Literature review of PsycInfo and PubMed databases. Results: The literature reviewed suggests these negative effects are not equally distributed by gender—studies indicate that women suffer disproportionately from IPV, especially in terms of injuries, fear, and posttraumatic stress. The review also finds that women experience greater decreases in relationship satisfaction as a result of IPV. Conclusions: Our review largely supports the contention of feminist theory that gender matters— but we would go further and say that what really matters is power; gender matters because it is so highly correlated with power. We propose that, due to cultural factors that typically ascribe higher status to the male gender, and men’s greater size and strength compared to women (on average), women are more likely than men to encounter contextual factors that disempower them and put them in situations—such as sexual abuse—that increase their risk of poor outcomes. Keywords: intimate partner violence, gender differences, gender symmetry, feminist theory, power Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a costly and debilitating health and social concern for families, communities, mental and physical health practitioners, the criminal justice system, policymakers, and society at large. In the past, IPV was conceptualized primarily as something men do to women; however, recent research has demonstrated that IPV is much more complex and multidimensional, defying simplistic expla- nations. For instance, gender symmetry, the no- tion that women are similarly or more aggres- sive than males in their intimate relationships (Johnson, 2006; Melton & Belknap, 2003; Straus, 2006; White, 2009), seems to apply for some types of IPV, but not others. Numerous studies have found that women commit equal (e.g., Katz, Kuffel, & Coblentz, 2002) or higher (Archer, 2000; Magdol et al., 1997) rates of physical aggression toward partners as compared to men, supporting gender symmetry theory. However, feminist theory, which views IPV as a gendered issue, is supported by studies finding that, relative to men, women experience more injuries (Archer, 2000), sexual victimization (Coker et al., 2002; Harned, 2001; Romito & Grassi, 2007; Slashinski, Coker, & Davis, 2003), and stalking (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000) from current and former intimate partners. In addition, law enforcement reports find that 75% of domestic violence offenders are male (Sny- der & McCurley, 2008), and on a typical day in the United States, approximately three females, compared to one male, are the victims of inti- ...

Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Violence OutcomesJe.docx

hanneloremccaffery

R S e p K J a b c d e a A R R 2 A K B S W T M D E I t ( 2 M S 0 h International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (2014) 556–561 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Drug Policy j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / d r u g p o esearch paper ingle room occupancy (SRO) hotels as mental health risk nvironments among impoverished women: The intersection of olicy, drug use, trauma, and urban space elly R. Knight a,∗, Andrea M. Lopez b,c, Megan Comfort c, Martha Shumway d, ennifer Cohen e, Elise D. Riley b Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States Urban Health Program, Research Triangle Institute International, United States Department of Psychiatry, Trauma Recovery Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, United States r t i c l e i n f o rticle history: eceived 8 May 2013 eceived in revised form 8 September 2013 ccepted 30 October 2013 eywords: uilt environment RO hotels omen rauma ental health rug use thnography a b s t r a c t Background: Due to the significantly high levels of comorbid substance use and mental health diagnosis among urban poor populations, examining the intersection of drug policy and place requires a consid- eration of the role of housing in drug user mental health. In San Francisco, geographic boundedness and progressive health and housing polices have coalesced to make single room occupancy hotels (SROs) a key urban built environment used to house poor populations with co-occurring drug use and mental health issues. Unstably housed women who use illicit drugs have high rates of lifetime and current trauma, which manifests in disproportionately high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression when compared to stably housed women. Methods: We report data from a qualitative interview study (n = 30) and four years of ethnography conducted with housing policy makers and unstably housed women who use drugs and live in SROs. Results: Women in the study lived in a range of SRO built environments, from publicly funded, newly built SROs to privately owned, dilapidated buildings, which presented a rich opportunity for ethno- graphic comparison. Applying Rhodes et al.’s framework of socio-structural vulnerability, we explore how SROs can operate as “mental health risk environments” in which macro-structural factors (housing policies shaping the built environment) interact with meso-level factors (social relations within SROs) and micro-level, b ...

RSepKJabcdeaARR2.docx

carlstromcurtis

Carney 2007 women who perpetrate ipv. review of lit

Azarelita Enriquez

Personality Disorders as Predictors of Lethal Intimate Partner Violence

Donna LaPalm

Journal of Sociology and Social Work June 2017, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 38-53 ISSN: 2333-5807 (Print), 2333-5815 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jssw.v5n1a5 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jssw.v5n1a5 38 Using an African American Lens to Explore the Intersection of Race, Gender, and Intimate Partner Violence Courtney Washington, MSW & Fred Buttell, PhD School of Social Work Tulane University United States Clare Cannon, PhD Department of Human Ecology University of California, Davis United States Abstract The purpose of this study was to apply Critical Race Theory to investigate whether differences exist between African American women and Caucasian women on constructs measuring conflict negotiation and parenting attitudes for female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Using the lens of critical race theory, we hypothesize that there are statistically significant differences between African American women and Caucasian women for indicators of parenting attitudes (measured by the AAPI-2) and intimate partner negotiation (measured by the CTS-2). The study employed a non-equivalent, control-group design and involved secondary data analysis. Data on 133 women was collected by a batterer intervention program in a metropolitan area in the Southeastern U.S. Binary logistic regression suggests that(1) the women in this sample who were more likely to score high on the CTS-2 physical scale were more likely to belong to the African American cohort; and (2) those women who scored in the high risk parenting category were also more likely to fall in the African American cohort. Findings indicate that critical race theory is a useful theoretical framework for understanding macro conditions in which women perpetrate IPV. Keywords: critical race theory, intimate partner violence, female perpetrators, batterer intervention 1. Introduction According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NIPSVS), 50% of women and 20% of men in the U.S. experience violence victimization other than rape over the course of their life. This victimization, in turn, leads to 27% of women and 12% of men who are victimized to experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), among other short-term and long-term negative health consequences (CDC, 2014). These victims have perpetrators who are often mandated to treatment or seek out treatment to address their use of violence in their intimate relationships. Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious social problem and, to combat it, batterer intervention programs (BIPs) have become the most prevalent treatment mechanism for perpetrators after a criminal domestic violence plea or conviction (Carney and Buttell, 2006; Price and Rosenbaum, 2009). However, only recently, has a growing body of literature begun to investigate the motivations, ...

Journal of Sociology and Social Work June 2017, Vol. 5, No.

TatianaMajor22

Similar a Domestic violence victims_and_recividism[1] (20)

Running head ASSIGNMENT 3-ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY .docx

M3A2by Jennif er Augustus.docx

Ipv Presentation

Williams Roe Knight Final Poster

Intimate Partner Violence: Prevalence, impact, treatment, prevention

Honors_Thesis_Poster_Presentation1

Running head Examining the reasons 1Examining the reasons 16.docx

Sexual Assault and PTSD by Laura OBrien

Domestic Violence Powerpoint

Domestic Violence Pp For Soc 610

MPA Bystander Poster Final

Psyc Of Women Presentation

FP6540_M5_A2_Larouche_Susan

Verbal Abuse

Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Violence OutcomesJe.docx

RSepKJabcdeaARR2.docx

Carney 2007 women who perpetrate ipv. review of lit

Personality Disorders as Predictors of Lethal Intimate Partner Violence

Journal of Sociology and Social Work June 2017, Vol. 5, No.