SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 6
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Developing Country Studies                                                                               www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
                                 0565
Vol 2, No.8, 2012



Reform without People in Nigeria: Understanding the Implication

  of “ownership gap” in implementing the Monetization of Fringe
       wnership

                                       Benefits in Public Sector

                                                 Nweke, Eugene N.
      Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences ,Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki
                              Science,                            Ebonyi
                                                   Nigeria
                                           E-mail:ndufield@yahoo.com


Abstract
This paper argues that there is ‘ownership gap’ in the design and implementation of monetized fringe benefits in
Nigeria’s public sector. It attributes the gap to alienation of the people in the public sector as well as the failure
of government to recognize the self interest factor of individuals at the introduction of the reform regime.
                                 he
Accordingly the paper notes that this caused the inability of the reform to significantly reduce waste, corruption
and failed to promote efficiency and accountability in public service provisioning. Theoretically the study used
                                                           public
the public choice theory derived from new public management framework to explain the relationship between
self interest and the challenges of monetization regime in the public sector. However in conclusi
                                                                                               conclusion, the paper
links the decadence in public service amidst the reform agenda to the factor it describes as a “reform without
people” and recommends that Nigerian government should consider the option of learning from private sector
organizations that have successfully applied the principles of monetization of fringe benefits of their personnel.
Key Words: Public Sector Reform ,Ownership,
                                      ,Ownership,Monetization and Fringe-benefits

1. Introduction
Nigeria as a multi-ethnic state with strong religious divide is politically and administratively volatile due to
                       ethnic                                         politically
identity differences. These have accentuated struggle for personal satisfaction and by extension providing for
identity allies in virtually all aspects public endeavour in Nigeria. The public service is not exempte from this
                                                                                                   exempted
politics of self interest.
      The history of public service in Nigeria reflects strive for private and sectional gains among the operators
(public servants) against the background that it is designed to serve public interest. While this is traced to
colonial, military and civilian administrative influences, the aspiration is that governments and administrations
should use the public service as apparatus of government to improve organizational performance. The success in
this regard reflects contributions to improve education, health, roads and transport systems, and modernization of
                            butions
telecommunication systems. All these and many more are made possible in part by the activities of their public
administrations. (Nnoli 2003:249)
      Aside from these, much still remains to be accomplished resulting from the decline in honesty and integrity
of personnel in public sector. Obviously, therefore, the reason is the struggle for personal advantage within
Nigeria’s public administration orchestrated by ethnic and political cleavages that intrude and as well as limit
                                                                 political
self accounting in public service. The concomitant of this, manifest in poor work ethics where average public
officer puts self above public service and works to exploits the system instead of embracing t work withthe
passion.
      As recourse to these afflictions, Nigerian government introduced the monetization of fringe benefits as a
reform agenda to reinvent the public interest by public servant. This therefore brings us to understanding the
concept of ‘monetization’ and ‘fringe benefits’ as used in this study.In the policy document of Federal Republic
                     ization’
of Nigeria on ‘monetisation of fringe benefits’, it states that, ‘monetisation’ is the “quantification in money terms
of those fringe benefits which government used to provide for its workers as part of their conditions of
service”(FGN,2002:10).Furthermore, Onu (2006:275) explains monetisation as “the process of converting fringe
benefits attached to workers salaries into cash incentives. The cash incentives are to be paid in swoop or in
instalment depending on the financial strength of the paying body”.
      On the other hand, fringe benefits as put by McConnell (1987) are the rewards other than wages that
employees receive from their employers and which include pension, medical and dental insurance, paid
                                                                       pension,
vacations and sick leaves. In the related views of, W.G. Nickels, J.M McHugh and Susan M (1999) fringe



                                                         81
Developing Country Studies                                                                              www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
                                 0565
Vol 2, No.8, 2012

benefits are benefits such as sick leave pay, vacation pay, pension’s plans, and health plans that represent
additional compensation to employees beyond bare wage.
    tional
      These benefits were provided by government of Nigeria until 2002,when the then president ,Olusegun
Obasanjo introduced the monetization of fringe benefits in public service. This becomes interesting espec especially
and for the fact that the reform is introduced to enable government;
     (i)      get the true pictures of what it costs to maintain a political office holder or public servant and
              therefore lead to a more realistic planning, budgeting and budget implementation.
     (ii)     enhance fiscal discipline which positively impact on the national value systems and ethics.
     (iii)    put corruption on check thereby enhancing efficiency in the public service
     (iv)     ensure equity in the allocation of scarce resources
     (v)      to help public officers to develop and imbibe a culture of maintenance, discipline and frugal use of
              public utilities.( The Federal Government of Nigeria policy document (2002:15) on monetization of
              fringe benefits)
These objectives are very laudable and will no doubt improve public service as found in most private sector
                                                                            service
organization that practice monetization of fringe benefits. However its practice in Nigeria’s public service for the
past twelve years has left so much to desire due to abysmal failure of the reform to significantly contri
                                                                                                   contribute to the
improvement in the workings of public sector. One of identified gaps in this regards is lack of ownership in the
reform process by policymaking institution, personnel and beneficiaries. It is therefore within this context that
the paper sets to examine implications of ‘ownership gap’ in implementing monetization of fringe benefits in
the Nigeria’s public sector. Let us at juncture discuss the technique of this study.

2. Methodology
The methodology for gathering information in this study revolves on the use of documentary research. It requires
                                                           revolves
the review of books, journals, government reports and other literatures. The use of this technique is necessary,
for the reason that it is assumed that the documented and published work is quite reliable and dependable.
2.1 Theoretical Explanation
Choices in the public sector are a matter of locating problems of market failure, determining the efficient
solution, and finding ways to achieve it. This is the concern of Federal Government of Nigeria when it
introduced monetization of fringe benefits due to public and civil servants .While the concern lasts, the
perceptions and dispositions of the targeted personnel poise the challenge of satisfying individual needs. It is
upon this understanding that the publ choice theory is adopted as a tool to analyze the interests of government
                                   public
and people in public as they interface in the monetization regime Public choice theory assumes that individuals
                                                             regime.
engage in rent-seeking behavior by pursuing their self
                 seeking                               self-interest in their dealings with the public sector; they
continue to try to maximize utility or profit. Public choice theory discards the notion that people in the public
sector seek to maximize net benefits to society as a whole. Rather, it assumes that each particip
                                                                                           participant in the public
sector seeks to maximize his or her own utility.
      This theory is derived from new public management (NPM),which traces its roots to early 1990’s in
United States of America as a criticism of traditional approach that promotes and primari conforms to process
                                                                                      primarily
rather than achieving results. In the words of Rosenbloom and Kravchuk (2002:21) NPM “starts from the
premise that traditional, bureaucratically organized public administration is “broke” and “broken” and
consequently the public has lost faith in government”. Upon this assumption ,public choice theory argues against
the background individual self interest to opine that for people in public sector to achieve the objectives of
satisfying the society, there is need for external oversight by legislature that assesses performance but opposes
that which focuses on internal managerial matters, including spending, personnel administration and
organisation”. (Rosenbloom, D.H and Kravchuk, R, S.2002:573). This perspective argues that accountabil in
                                                                                                   accountability
public organisation can be achieved through market mechanism and customers’ judgements. As Stoker (1998)
argues the New Public Management (NPM) describes models of public service that reflect a ‘reinvented’ form of
government which is better managed. To this end, some have hailed NPM as a “paradigm shift” from the
                                managed.
bureaucratic model and attempts to transform the public sector through organizational reforms that focus on
results in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of services. (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Borins 1994;
Hughes 1998). Peters and Pierre (1998:232) note that NPM “replace highly centralized, hierarchical structures
with decentralized management environment where decisions on resource allocation and service delivery are
made closer to the point of delivery”. Accordingly the objectives of public choice theory for organizational
          ser
performance include; making public administration better through market like competition in provision of
goods and services, increased citizens value by making service delivery customer driven, adherence to norms,
identification of mission, building accountability, Separating service from control, expanding customer choice,
Providing incentives, analyzing results and feedback.



                                                        82
Developing Country Studies                                                                             www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
                                 0565
Vol 2, No.8, 2012

     As these “are a common response to common pressures public hostility to government, shrinking budgets,
                             n                     pressures—public
and the imperatives of globalization” (Polidano, 1999:2). Let us build upon this framework to discuss how public
choice theory postulations can be circumvented in public service and maximize ownership so as to gain from
                                                            service
monetization of fringe in the public service.

3. Reform Ownership in Monetization of Fringe Benefits
The Federal Government of Nigeria between 1999 and 2002 caused massive increment in recurrent expenditure
as it rose from 499.67 billion naira to aggressive 696.78 billion naira in 2002(in other word from about 47.45%
to 68.44%) (Bello 2004, AllAfrica.com).The sum is spent in procuring, maintaining and keeping state officials in
affluent transportation, accommodation, medical services and so on. Although these amount was spent to
                                   odation,
improve the non- salary components of their wages and motivate workers to perform better, the outcome
remained abysmal low productivity of public personnel.In sum the expected objectives is to reduce to barest
                                                                                  objectives
minimum such negative fiscal challenges and in the stead, enhance efficiency in resources allocation in order to
move the economy forward”. (Guardian, 2004:12).The monetized fringe benefits includes; residential
                                                 2004:12).The
accommodation, furniture allowance, utility allowance, medical allowance, leave grant, meal subsidy, domestic
                       niture
servants allowance, motor vehicle loan and fuelling, Maintenance of official vehicles and transport allowance,
meal subsidy and entertainment allowance. (The Obasanjo Reforms: Monetization Policy. A publication of the
                                                           njo
Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation .2004:18
                                                            .2004:18-19).
      Reform ownership is an important determinant for policy success. Its political economy hinges on
achieving effective governance at the reduced cost through stabilization and adjustment. Johnson and Wasty
(1993:2) describe ownership using a four dimensional variables; “locus of initiative; namely, who had the
initiative in formulating and implementing the programme, the degree of collaboration in working out the
                                                                                 collaboration
programme, and whether or not the funding for the programme was extended despite certain reservations of the
authorities (disagreements and reluctance to implement some aspects of the programme). The second dimension
is the level of intellectual conviction among key policymakers namely, the degree to which there was consensus
          el
among policymakers on the nature and causes of the problem, the choices open for its resolution, and the
approach to be taken. The third dimension is the expression of political will by top leadership: as reflected, for
                                                     expression
example, in up-front actions and public statements. The fourth dimension comprises efforts toward
                    front
consensus-building among constituencies, for instance, by eliciting broad participation in th programme design
             building                                                                        the
and in launching a broad-based public campaign to elicit support for the programme outside the central
                               based
government”. All these combine to achieve ‘national ownership’ which Klick et al (1998:87) describe as “when
the political leadership and its advisers, with broad support among agencies of state and civil society, decide of
their own volition that policy changes are desirable, choose what these changes should be and when they should
be introduced, and where these changes become built into parameters of policy and administration which are
                                                          into
generally accepted as desirable”
      On the strength of these explanations we note that monetization of fringe benefits has fallen short in part
some of the requirements for attaining ownership in the reform agenda. This stems from the stakeholder analysis
which reveals, based on the report from the Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation(2011) that
“the present Administration adopted the monetization programme following strong representations by the
Revenue Mobilization, Allocation and Fiscal Commission and after an intensive debate by the National nation
devoting over 60% of its revenue to sustaining recurrent overheads, to the detriment of capital/infrastructural
development” The administration referred is that of Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
                                 on
        By this report it is glare that other relevant stakeholders such as employees (public personnel or
servants),the labour, head of service, Ministries of Finance and Labour and Productivity were not involved in the
                                                                             Productivity
initiation of the reform agenda. This essentially is the “ownership gap” in the monetization of fringe benefits as
the reform agenda. The negative outcome arising from this, is the concern of the next section.
3.1 The Implications of “ownership gap” in attaining the objectives of monetization
                    ons
There are a set outcomes from “ownership gap” in the entire monetization process of fringe benefits in Nigeria’s
public sector. The first is the culture of inconsistency and lack of uniformity in the standard of implementation.
                                                                     uniformity
This arose from battered political will exhibited by political leaders and conflicting assumptions in the theory
and practice federalism among the federating units in Nigerian state. This essentially is a challenge in the reform
process given that the background to reform ownership places political environment and commitment as
apriority condition required for reform success. Obviously, many State governments and local Government
councils in Nigeria have either not or half hazardly implemented. The tension and industrial crises associated
with this is a reflection and perception of imposition by the public servants. It is a manifestation that
governments of Nigeria is unable to get the true pictures of what it costs to maintain a political office holder or
public servant for a more realistic planning, budgeting and budget implementation.



                                                        83
Developing Country Studies                                                                              www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
                                 0565
Vol 2, No.8, 2012

The second implication of ownership gap in the monetization policy is a reflection of assumptions of public
choice theory that public servants are self serving. As a consequence, the government institutions are weakened
                             ervants
and capacity to ensure compliance compromised. All these tilt to the fact that there is low macroecnomic
improvement that can sustain market reforms in public service without attitudinal capacity to operate the
                                                                      without
principles of market in a public sector developed along socialist ideals.Importantly, this gap therefore is a
concomitant of a State where social services were earlier     provided free by government.
As a follow up,the third repercussion of ownership is that the reform agenda has failed to enhance fiscal
                     e
discipline which positively impact on the national value systems and ethics.By extension the weak institutional
mechanism has unable to put corruption on check thereby enhancing efficiency in the public service.This
                                                         thereby
explains the growth in corrupt practices besides the improvement in corruption perception index of Nigeria from
the rank of 143 out of 183 countries studied in 2011 . (Transprancy International corruption perception index
report of 2011)
(http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2011 retrieved on 23/07/12).
 http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2011                     23/07/12).
The analysis of monetization of fringe benefits within the lens of reform ownership further reviewed the
weaknesses of total commitment in implementing this reform agenda since its introduction in 2002, as it lacks
comprehensiveness in formulation and implementation. This hinged on the ignoring beneficiary ownership as
essential ingredient in reform success. The challenge of comprehensiveness also extends to the civil servants
who ought to be properly consulted in the policy process bearing in mind that they are the custodian of public
sector
 ector      as    well     as    the    prime     target    benefactors.(see    Guardian      ,Wednesday       ,July
16,2003:15,Guardian ,Tuesday ,August 5,2003:3). Compliment to this is the assertion of Omema (2007:28) that,
“in Nigeria, most reforms are talked about at the strategic rather than operational level. Only a few people at the
                                                                   than
top know what the policy is actually trying to achieve. As such it is not out of context to say that the exercise is
elitist, both in conception and implementation.This accounts for the emergence for the winner and losers
                                                                                               winners
thereby weakening accountability process in the face of prevailing completion for individual gain. While
personal satisfaction is cardinal to drive attainment of reform objectives, effective governance is desirable to
avoid decadence in public service provisioning.
                           c
It is therefore as a matter of conclusion to recommend that both government and recipients need to reappraise the
reform agenda to ensure total commitment towards eliminating private interest as a basis for public service
delivery among public servant. To this extent the objectives of monetization should reflect the market attitude of
            mong
private sector both in form and operation to promote good governance in Nigeria.

Bibliography
    1. Abdusalmi, A (1999) “Accountability and policy making in the local government System” In Obasi, I.N
                                                                  in
        and N.O.Yaqub (eds) Local government Policy making and execution in Nigeria. Ibadan: Sam
        Bookman Publishers.
    2. Bello(2004) Monetization: Top civil servants corner vehicles.(All Africa.com)
    3. Borins, S. (1994). ‘Government in Transition: A New Paradigm in Public Administration’. Toronto:
                                   rnment
        Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management.
    4. Bernnet R T (1992) Dictionary of Personnel and Human Resources Management. Longman Group UK
        Ltd.
    5. Esenwa, F.O. (2003) Paper presented at National Quantity Surveyors workshop on the
         monetization policy of Federal government of Nigeria
    6. Ezeani, E.O. (2003) “Public Accountability: A conceptual Analysis.” In Ezeani, E.O (ed) Public
        Accountability in Nigeria: Perspectives and Issues. Enugu. Academic Publishing Company
    7. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2002) The Obasanjo Reform: Monetisation Policy, Abuja.Apublication
        of the federal ministry of Information and National Orientation
    8.   Hughes, O.E. (1998). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction
                                                                       inistration:    Introduction,2nd (ed).
        Basingstoke: Macmillan
    9. Nnoli, O (2003) Introduction to Politics. Revised 2nd Edition. Enugu.Pan Africa Centre for
         Research on Peace and Conflict (PARCEP)SNAAP Press Ltd
    10. Nwachukwu, L C (2007) Monetization policy in Nigeria: Issues and Policy Assessment in Obi, E.A
        and Dalhatu, M.Y(ed) Current Practices                      and Problems of Nigerian Public
        Administration.Onitsha .Book Point LTD.
    11. Omemma, T.J (2007) Monetization Policy and the Nigerian Civil Service:Challenges and Pros Prospects In
        African Journal of politics and Administrative studies. Department of Political Science .Ebonyi State
        University, Abakalki-Nigeria.Vol 3. No.1 October
                               Nigeria.Vol
    12. Onu, G (2006), Building a culture of trust and accountability in Governance Process through PubPublic



                                                        84
Developing Country Studies                                                                        www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online)
                                 0565
Vol 2, No.8, 2012

         Service reforms: The Nigerian Experience ‘ANSU Journal of Politics and Administration.Vol.1, No.1
         October.
     13. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler (1992). Re-inventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is
                                                         inventing
         Transforming the Public Sector New York:Penguin
                                   Sector.
     14. Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre.(1998).“Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public
         Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and    Theory,
                                                                           Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2:223
                                                                                               2:223-243.
     15. Polidano, C (1999). The new public management in developing countries. Institute for Development
         Policy and Management. University of Manchester Precinct Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13
         9GH, UK
    16. Rosenbloom,D.H and ravchuk.R.S(2002).Public Administration:Understandng Management,
        Politics and Law in the public Sector, Singapore: McCraw Hill.
     17. Stoker,       G.    (1998).     “Governance       as    Theory:   Five    Propositions.”International
                                                                                   Propositions.”
         Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1: 17
                                 ,                17-28.
     18. The Guardian, Sunday January 16, 2005 p.44
     19. The Guardian, Sunday April 10, 2005, p.6  p.6-7
     20. The Guardian, Sunday January 23, 2005 p2
     21. The Guardian, Sunday September 4, 2005, p.1
     22. The Guardian, Sunday, Febuary 8 ,2004
     23. The Guardian, Sunday August 21, 2005 p4
     24. The Sun, Monday August 18,2008 p18
     25. Transprancy       International         corruption    perception index    report    of    2007     &
         2008)http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2007 retrieved on 10/07/09
                http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2007




                                                      85
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org


The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of
IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page:
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/

The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...
Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...
Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...Tri Widodo W. UTOMO
 
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...iosrjce
 
Quality of Public Services -English
Quality of Public Services  -EnglishQuality of Public Services  -English
Quality of Public Services -EnglishBRDIGROUP
 
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)Jaime Archundia
 
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...Premier Publishers
 
Coperative the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reduction
Coperative  the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reductionCoperative  the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reduction
Coperative the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reductionNewman Enyioko
 
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
Health Care Financing in Cameroon
Health Care Financing in CameroonHealth Care Financing in Cameroon
Health Care Financing in Cameroonayenika
 
Finance for Development
Finance for DevelopmentFinance for Development
Finance for Developmentayenika
 
Innovations and Strategies in Public Administration
Innovations and Strategies in Public AdministrationInnovations and Strategies in Public Administration
Innovations and Strategies in Public AdministrationMarlyn Allanigue
 
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)ijceronline
 
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...Triple A Research Journal
 
Mutualisation of public services
Mutualisation of public servicesMutualisation of public services
Mutualisation of public servicesM S Siddiqui
 

La actualidad más candente (18)

Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...
Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...
Significant changes with little progress: evaluation on the 3 rd year of the ...
 
A280107
A280107A280107
A280107
 
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...
Impact of Microcredit on Socio-Cultural Status of Members of Wshgs; A Study i...
 
Quality of Public Services -English
Quality of Public Services  -EnglishQuality of Public Services  -English
Quality of Public Services -English
 
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)
TEAG Policy Memo FF (081413)
 
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...
Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Private Extension Services by Crop Far...
 
Coperative the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reduction
Coperative  the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reductionCoperative  the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reduction
Coperative the-role-of-cooperative-society-in-poverty-reduction
 
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
 
Health Care Financing in Cameroon
Health Care Financing in CameroonHealth Care Financing in Cameroon
Health Care Financing in Cameroon
 
Finance for Development
Finance for DevelopmentFinance for Development
Finance for Development
 
Research proposal
Research proposalResearch proposal
Research proposal
 
Innovations and Strategies in Public Administration
Innovations and Strategies in Public AdministrationInnovations and Strategies in Public Administration
Innovations and Strategies in Public Administration
 
Country Presentation Tunisia
Country Presentation TunisiaCountry Presentation Tunisia
Country Presentation Tunisia
 
Pay For Success Report 2012
Pay For Success Report 2012Pay For Success Report 2012
Pay For Success Report 2012
 
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
 
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...
Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Financing in Uas...
 
Mutualisation of public services
Mutualisation of public servicesMutualisation of public services
Mutualisation of public services
 
My Ppt
My PptMy Ppt
My Ppt
 

Similar a Reform without people in nigeria understanding the implication of ownership gap_ in implementing the monetization of fringe benefits in public sector

Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...iosrjce
 
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...Alexander Decker
 
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environments
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environmentsHealth service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environments
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environmentsAlexander Decker
 
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-71
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-716 the economic implications of monetization 60-71
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-71Alexander Decker
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeria
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeriaNew public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeria
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
Fiscal accountability dilemma
Fiscal accountability dilemmaFiscal accountability dilemma
Fiscal accountability dilemmaAlexander Decker
 
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...ijtsrd
 
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...fouzia awan
 
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeriaAlexander Decker
 
Public And Private Sector
Public And Private SectorPublic And Private Sector
Public And Private SectorMelissa Jimenez
 
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docxrhetttrevannion
 
Ngos As A Part Of Accountability
Ngos As A Part Of AccountabilityNgos As A Part Of Accountability
Ngos As A Part Of AccountabilityHaley Johnson
 
Public Service Delivery
Public Service DeliveryPublic Service Delivery
Public Service Deliveryeuwebtc01
 
Public Service Delivery
Public Service DeliveryPublic Service Delivery
Public Service Deliveryeuwebsc01
 
Work in the Public Service of the Future
Work in the Public Service of the FutureWork in the Public Service of the Future
Work in the Public Service of the FutureYvonne Gomez
 

Similar a Reform without people in nigeria understanding the implication of ownership gap_ in implementing the monetization of fringe benefits in public sector (20)

Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
Public Sector Reforms and Outsourcing Services in Nigeria: An Empirical Evalu...
 
Public Service Reforms: An Introduction
Public Service Reforms: An IntroductionPublic Service Reforms: An Introduction
Public Service Reforms: An Introduction
 
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...
New public management and public service effectiveness in nigeria a pragmatic...
 
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environments
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environmentsHealth service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environments
Health service delivery in nigeria managing the organizational environments
 
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-71
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-716 the economic implications of monetization 60-71
6 the economic implications of monetization 60-71
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
 
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
“Counting” the cost of policy inconsistency in nigeria
 
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeria
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeriaNew public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeria
New public management (npm) and public sector administration in nigeria
 
Fiscal accountability dilemma
Fiscal accountability dilemmaFiscal accountability dilemma
Fiscal accountability dilemma
 
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...
Effect of Fiscal Responsibility Act on Budgeting and Accountability Practice ...
 
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...
DIGITALIZATION_DRIVEN_PUBLIC_SERVICE_AND_SERVICE_DELIVERY_THE_NIGERIAS_EXPERI...
 
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
11.[1 12]challenges of managing local government finance in nigeria
 
G0361051056
G0361051056G0361051056
G0361051056
 
Public And Private Sector
Public And Private SectorPublic And Private Sector
Public And Private Sector
 
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx
2Running Head THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR.docx
 
Ngos As A Part Of Accountability
Ngos As A Part Of AccountabilityNgos As A Part Of Accountability
Ngos As A Part Of Accountability
 
Public Service Delivery
Public Service DeliveryPublic Service Delivery
Public Service Delivery
 
Public Service Delivery
Public Service DeliveryPublic Service Delivery
Public Service Delivery
 
Work in the Public Service of the Future
Work in the Public Service of the FutureWork in the Public Service of the Future
Work in the Public Service of the Future
 

Más de Alexander Decker

Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...Alexander Decker
 
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale inA validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale inAlexander Decker
 
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websitesA usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websitesAlexander Decker
 
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksA universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksAlexander Decker
 
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized dA unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized dAlexander Decker
 
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistanceA trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistanceAlexander Decker
 
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A transformational  generative approach towards understanding al-istifhamA transformational  generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifhamAlexander Decker
 
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibiaA time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibiaAlexander Decker
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenAlexander Decker
 
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksA theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksAlexander Decker
 
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
A systematic evaluation of link budget forA systematic evaluation of link budget for
A systematic evaluation of link budget forAlexander Decker
 
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjabA synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjabAlexander Decker
 
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...Alexander Decker
 
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incrementalA survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incrementalAlexander Decker
 
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniquesA survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniquesAlexander Decker
 
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo dbA survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo dbAlexander Decker
 
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey on challenges to the media cloudA survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey on challenges to the media cloudAlexander Decker
 
A survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of provenance leveragedA survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of provenance leveragedAlexander Decker
 
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
A survey of private equity investments in kenyaA survey of private equity investments in kenya
A survey of private equity investments in kenyaAlexander Decker
 
A study to measures the financial health of
A study to measures the financial health ofA study to measures the financial health of
A study to measures the financial health ofAlexander Decker
 

Más de Alexander Decker (20)

Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
 
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale inA validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
 
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websitesA usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
 
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksA universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
 
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized dA unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
 
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistanceA trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
 
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A transformational  generative approach towards understanding al-istifhamA transformational  generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
 
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibiaA time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
 
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banksA theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
 
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
A systematic evaluation of link budget forA systematic evaluation of link budget for
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
 
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjabA synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
 
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
 
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incrementalA survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
 
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniquesA survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
 
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo dbA survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
 
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey on challenges to the media cloudA survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
 
A survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of provenance leveragedA survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of provenance leveraged
 
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
A survey of private equity investments in kenyaA survey of private equity investments in kenya
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
 
A study to measures the financial health of
A study to measures the financial health ofA study to measures the financial health of
A study to measures the financial health of
 

Reform without people in nigeria understanding the implication of ownership gap_ in implementing the monetization of fringe benefits in public sector

  • 1. Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) 0565 Vol 2, No.8, 2012 Reform without People in Nigeria: Understanding the Implication of “ownership gap” in implementing the Monetization of Fringe wnership Benefits in Public Sector Nweke, Eugene N. Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences ,Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki Science, Ebonyi Nigeria E-mail:ndufield@yahoo.com Abstract This paper argues that there is ‘ownership gap’ in the design and implementation of monetized fringe benefits in Nigeria’s public sector. It attributes the gap to alienation of the people in the public sector as well as the failure of government to recognize the self interest factor of individuals at the introduction of the reform regime. he Accordingly the paper notes that this caused the inability of the reform to significantly reduce waste, corruption and failed to promote efficiency and accountability in public service provisioning. Theoretically the study used public the public choice theory derived from new public management framework to explain the relationship between self interest and the challenges of monetization regime in the public sector. However in conclusi conclusion, the paper links the decadence in public service amidst the reform agenda to the factor it describes as a “reform without people” and recommends that Nigerian government should consider the option of learning from private sector organizations that have successfully applied the principles of monetization of fringe benefits of their personnel. Key Words: Public Sector Reform ,Ownership, ,Ownership,Monetization and Fringe-benefits 1. Introduction Nigeria as a multi-ethnic state with strong religious divide is politically and administratively volatile due to ethnic politically identity differences. These have accentuated struggle for personal satisfaction and by extension providing for identity allies in virtually all aspects public endeavour in Nigeria. The public service is not exempte from this exempted politics of self interest. The history of public service in Nigeria reflects strive for private and sectional gains among the operators (public servants) against the background that it is designed to serve public interest. While this is traced to colonial, military and civilian administrative influences, the aspiration is that governments and administrations should use the public service as apparatus of government to improve organizational performance. The success in this regard reflects contributions to improve education, health, roads and transport systems, and modernization of butions telecommunication systems. All these and many more are made possible in part by the activities of their public administrations. (Nnoli 2003:249) Aside from these, much still remains to be accomplished resulting from the decline in honesty and integrity of personnel in public sector. Obviously, therefore, the reason is the struggle for personal advantage within Nigeria’s public administration orchestrated by ethnic and political cleavages that intrude and as well as limit political self accounting in public service. The concomitant of this, manifest in poor work ethics where average public officer puts self above public service and works to exploits the system instead of embracing t work withthe passion. As recourse to these afflictions, Nigerian government introduced the monetization of fringe benefits as a reform agenda to reinvent the public interest by public servant. This therefore brings us to understanding the concept of ‘monetization’ and ‘fringe benefits’ as used in this study.In the policy document of Federal Republic ization’ of Nigeria on ‘monetisation of fringe benefits’, it states that, ‘monetisation’ is the “quantification in money terms of those fringe benefits which government used to provide for its workers as part of their conditions of service”(FGN,2002:10).Furthermore, Onu (2006:275) explains monetisation as “the process of converting fringe benefits attached to workers salaries into cash incentives. The cash incentives are to be paid in swoop or in instalment depending on the financial strength of the paying body”. On the other hand, fringe benefits as put by McConnell (1987) are the rewards other than wages that employees receive from their employers and which include pension, medical and dental insurance, paid pension, vacations and sick leaves. In the related views of, W.G. Nickels, J.M McHugh and Susan M (1999) fringe 81
  • 2. Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) 0565 Vol 2, No.8, 2012 benefits are benefits such as sick leave pay, vacation pay, pension’s plans, and health plans that represent additional compensation to employees beyond bare wage. tional These benefits were provided by government of Nigeria until 2002,when the then president ,Olusegun Obasanjo introduced the monetization of fringe benefits in public service. This becomes interesting espec especially and for the fact that the reform is introduced to enable government; (i) get the true pictures of what it costs to maintain a political office holder or public servant and therefore lead to a more realistic planning, budgeting and budget implementation. (ii) enhance fiscal discipline which positively impact on the national value systems and ethics. (iii) put corruption on check thereby enhancing efficiency in the public service (iv) ensure equity in the allocation of scarce resources (v) to help public officers to develop and imbibe a culture of maintenance, discipline and frugal use of public utilities.( The Federal Government of Nigeria policy document (2002:15) on monetization of fringe benefits) These objectives are very laudable and will no doubt improve public service as found in most private sector service organization that practice monetization of fringe benefits. However its practice in Nigeria’s public service for the past twelve years has left so much to desire due to abysmal failure of the reform to significantly contri contribute to the improvement in the workings of public sector. One of identified gaps in this regards is lack of ownership in the reform process by policymaking institution, personnel and beneficiaries. It is therefore within this context that the paper sets to examine implications of ‘ownership gap’ in implementing monetization of fringe benefits in the Nigeria’s public sector. Let us at juncture discuss the technique of this study. 2. Methodology The methodology for gathering information in this study revolves on the use of documentary research. It requires revolves the review of books, journals, government reports and other literatures. The use of this technique is necessary, for the reason that it is assumed that the documented and published work is quite reliable and dependable. 2.1 Theoretical Explanation Choices in the public sector are a matter of locating problems of market failure, determining the efficient solution, and finding ways to achieve it. This is the concern of Federal Government of Nigeria when it introduced monetization of fringe benefits due to public and civil servants .While the concern lasts, the perceptions and dispositions of the targeted personnel poise the challenge of satisfying individual needs. It is upon this understanding that the publ choice theory is adopted as a tool to analyze the interests of government public and people in public as they interface in the monetization regime Public choice theory assumes that individuals regime. engage in rent-seeking behavior by pursuing their self seeking self-interest in their dealings with the public sector; they continue to try to maximize utility or profit. Public choice theory discards the notion that people in the public sector seek to maximize net benefits to society as a whole. Rather, it assumes that each particip participant in the public sector seeks to maximize his or her own utility. This theory is derived from new public management (NPM),which traces its roots to early 1990’s in United States of America as a criticism of traditional approach that promotes and primari conforms to process primarily rather than achieving results. In the words of Rosenbloom and Kravchuk (2002:21) NPM “starts from the premise that traditional, bureaucratically organized public administration is “broke” and “broken” and consequently the public has lost faith in government”. Upon this assumption ,public choice theory argues against the background individual self interest to opine that for people in public sector to achieve the objectives of satisfying the society, there is need for external oversight by legislature that assesses performance but opposes that which focuses on internal managerial matters, including spending, personnel administration and organisation”. (Rosenbloom, D.H and Kravchuk, R, S.2002:573). This perspective argues that accountabil in accountability public organisation can be achieved through market mechanism and customers’ judgements. As Stoker (1998) argues the New Public Management (NPM) describes models of public service that reflect a ‘reinvented’ form of government which is better managed. To this end, some have hailed NPM as a “paradigm shift” from the managed. bureaucratic model and attempts to transform the public sector through organizational reforms that focus on results in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of services. (Osborne and Gaebler 1992; Borins 1994; Hughes 1998). Peters and Pierre (1998:232) note that NPM “replace highly centralized, hierarchical structures with decentralized management environment where decisions on resource allocation and service delivery are made closer to the point of delivery”. Accordingly the objectives of public choice theory for organizational ser performance include; making public administration better through market like competition in provision of goods and services, increased citizens value by making service delivery customer driven, adherence to norms, identification of mission, building accountability, Separating service from control, expanding customer choice, Providing incentives, analyzing results and feedback. 82
  • 3. Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) 0565 Vol 2, No.8, 2012 As these “are a common response to common pressures public hostility to government, shrinking budgets, n pressures—public and the imperatives of globalization” (Polidano, 1999:2). Let us build upon this framework to discuss how public choice theory postulations can be circumvented in public service and maximize ownership so as to gain from service monetization of fringe in the public service. 3. Reform Ownership in Monetization of Fringe Benefits The Federal Government of Nigeria between 1999 and 2002 caused massive increment in recurrent expenditure as it rose from 499.67 billion naira to aggressive 696.78 billion naira in 2002(in other word from about 47.45% to 68.44%) (Bello 2004, AllAfrica.com).The sum is spent in procuring, maintaining and keeping state officials in affluent transportation, accommodation, medical services and so on. Although these amount was spent to odation, improve the non- salary components of their wages and motivate workers to perform better, the outcome remained abysmal low productivity of public personnel.In sum the expected objectives is to reduce to barest objectives minimum such negative fiscal challenges and in the stead, enhance efficiency in resources allocation in order to move the economy forward”. (Guardian, 2004:12).The monetized fringe benefits includes; residential 2004:12).The accommodation, furniture allowance, utility allowance, medical allowance, leave grant, meal subsidy, domestic niture servants allowance, motor vehicle loan and fuelling, Maintenance of official vehicles and transport allowance, meal subsidy and entertainment allowance. (The Obasanjo Reforms: Monetization Policy. A publication of the njo Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation .2004:18 .2004:18-19). Reform ownership is an important determinant for policy success. Its political economy hinges on achieving effective governance at the reduced cost through stabilization and adjustment. Johnson and Wasty (1993:2) describe ownership using a four dimensional variables; “locus of initiative; namely, who had the initiative in formulating and implementing the programme, the degree of collaboration in working out the collaboration programme, and whether or not the funding for the programme was extended despite certain reservations of the authorities (disagreements and reluctance to implement some aspects of the programme). The second dimension is the level of intellectual conviction among key policymakers namely, the degree to which there was consensus el among policymakers on the nature and causes of the problem, the choices open for its resolution, and the approach to be taken. The third dimension is the expression of political will by top leadership: as reflected, for expression example, in up-front actions and public statements. The fourth dimension comprises efforts toward front consensus-building among constituencies, for instance, by eliciting broad participation in th programme design building the and in launching a broad-based public campaign to elicit support for the programme outside the central based government”. All these combine to achieve ‘national ownership’ which Klick et al (1998:87) describe as “when the political leadership and its advisers, with broad support among agencies of state and civil society, decide of their own volition that policy changes are desirable, choose what these changes should be and when they should be introduced, and where these changes become built into parameters of policy and administration which are into generally accepted as desirable” On the strength of these explanations we note that monetization of fringe benefits has fallen short in part some of the requirements for attaining ownership in the reform agenda. This stems from the stakeholder analysis which reveals, based on the report from the Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation(2011) that “the present Administration adopted the monetization programme following strong representations by the Revenue Mobilization, Allocation and Fiscal Commission and after an intensive debate by the National nation devoting over 60% of its revenue to sustaining recurrent overheads, to the detriment of capital/infrastructural development” The administration referred is that of Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. on By this report it is glare that other relevant stakeholders such as employees (public personnel or servants),the labour, head of service, Ministries of Finance and Labour and Productivity were not involved in the Productivity initiation of the reform agenda. This essentially is the “ownership gap” in the monetization of fringe benefits as the reform agenda. The negative outcome arising from this, is the concern of the next section. 3.1 The Implications of “ownership gap” in attaining the objectives of monetization ons There are a set outcomes from “ownership gap” in the entire monetization process of fringe benefits in Nigeria’s public sector. The first is the culture of inconsistency and lack of uniformity in the standard of implementation. uniformity This arose from battered political will exhibited by political leaders and conflicting assumptions in the theory and practice federalism among the federating units in Nigerian state. This essentially is a challenge in the reform process given that the background to reform ownership places political environment and commitment as apriority condition required for reform success. Obviously, many State governments and local Government councils in Nigeria have either not or half hazardly implemented. The tension and industrial crises associated with this is a reflection and perception of imposition by the public servants. It is a manifestation that governments of Nigeria is unable to get the true pictures of what it costs to maintain a political office holder or public servant for a more realistic planning, budgeting and budget implementation. 83
  • 4. Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) 0565 Vol 2, No.8, 2012 The second implication of ownership gap in the monetization policy is a reflection of assumptions of public choice theory that public servants are self serving. As a consequence, the government institutions are weakened ervants and capacity to ensure compliance compromised. All these tilt to the fact that there is low macroecnomic improvement that can sustain market reforms in public service without attitudinal capacity to operate the without principles of market in a public sector developed along socialist ideals.Importantly, this gap therefore is a concomitant of a State where social services were earlier provided free by government. As a follow up,the third repercussion of ownership is that the reform agenda has failed to enhance fiscal e discipline which positively impact on the national value systems and ethics.By extension the weak institutional mechanism has unable to put corruption on check thereby enhancing efficiency in the public service.This thereby explains the growth in corrupt practices besides the improvement in corruption perception index of Nigeria from the rank of 143 out of 183 countries studied in 2011 . (Transprancy International corruption perception index report of 2011) (http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2011 retrieved on 23/07/12). http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2011 23/07/12). The analysis of monetization of fringe benefits within the lens of reform ownership further reviewed the weaknesses of total commitment in implementing this reform agenda since its introduction in 2002, as it lacks comprehensiveness in formulation and implementation. This hinged on the ignoring beneficiary ownership as essential ingredient in reform success. The challenge of comprehensiveness also extends to the civil servants who ought to be properly consulted in the policy process bearing in mind that they are the custodian of public sector ector as well as the prime target benefactors.(see Guardian ,Wednesday ,July 16,2003:15,Guardian ,Tuesday ,August 5,2003:3). Compliment to this is the assertion of Omema (2007:28) that, “in Nigeria, most reforms are talked about at the strategic rather than operational level. Only a few people at the than top know what the policy is actually trying to achieve. As such it is not out of context to say that the exercise is elitist, both in conception and implementation.This accounts for the emergence for the winner and losers winners thereby weakening accountability process in the face of prevailing completion for individual gain. While personal satisfaction is cardinal to drive attainment of reform objectives, effective governance is desirable to avoid decadence in public service provisioning. c It is therefore as a matter of conclusion to recommend that both government and recipients need to reappraise the reform agenda to ensure total commitment towards eliminating private interest as a basis for public service delivery among public servant. To this extent the objectives of monetization should reflect the market attitude of mong private sector both in form and operation to promote good governance in Nigeria. Bibliography 1. Abdusalmi, A (1999) “Accountability and policy making in the local government System” In Obasi, I.N in and N.O.Yaqub (eds) Local government Policy making and execution in Nigeria. Ibadan: Sam Bookman Publishers. 2. Bello(2004) Monetization: Top civil servants corner vehicles.(All Africa.com) 3. Borins, S. (1994). ‘Government in Transition: A New Paradigm in Public Administration’. Toronto: rnment Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management. 4. Bernnet R T (1992) Dictionary of Personnel and Human Resources Management. Longman Group UK Ltd. 5. Esenwa, F.O. (2003) Paper presented at National Quantity Surveyors workshop on the monetization policy of Federal government of Nigeria 6. Ezeani, E.O. (2003) “Public Accountability: A conceptual Analysis.” In Ezeani, E.O (ed) Public Accountability in Nigeria: Perspectives and Issues. Enugu. Academic Publishing Company 7. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2002) The Obasanjo Reform: Monetisation Policy, Abuja.Apublication of the federal ministry of Information and National Orientation 8. Hughes, O.E. (1998). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction inistration: Introduction,2nd (ed). Basingstoke: Macmillan 9. Nnoli, O (2003) Introduction to Politics. Revised 2nd Edition. Enugu.Pan Africa Centre for Research on Peace and Conflict (PARCEP)SNAAP Press Ltd 10. Nwachukwu, L C (2007) Monetization policy in Nigeria: Issues and Policy Assessment in Obi, E.A and Dalhatu, M.Y(ed) Current Practices and Problems of Nigerian Public Administration.Onitsha .Book Point LTD. 11. Omemma, T.J (2007) Monetization Policy and the Nigerian Civil Service:Challenges and Pros Prospects In African Journal of politics and Administrative studies. Department of Political Science .Ebonyi State University, Abakalki-Nigeria.Vol 3. No.1 October Nigeria.Vol 12. Onu, G (2006), Building a culture of trust and accountability in Governance Process through PubPublic 84
  • 5. Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) 0565 Vol 2, No.8, 2012 Service reforms: The Nigerian Experience ‘ANSU Journal of Politics and Administration.Vol.1, No.1 October. 13. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler (1992). Re-inventing Government:How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is inventing Transforming the Public Sector New York:Penguin Sector. 14. Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre.(1998).“Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2:223 2:223-243. 15. Polidano, C (1999). The new public management in developing countries. Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester Precinct Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9GH, UK 16. Rosenbloom,D.H and ravchuk.R.S(2002).Public Administration:Understandng Management, Politics and Law in the public Sector, Singapore: McCraw Hill. 17. Stoker, G. (1998). “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.”International Propositions.” Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1: 17 , 17-28. 18. The Guardian, Sunday January 16, 2005 p.44 19. The Guardian, Sunday April 10, 2005, p.6 p.6-7 20. The Guardian, Sunday January 23, 2005 p2 21. The Guardian, Sunday September 4, 2005, p.1 22. The Guardian, Sunday, Febuary 8 ,2004 23. The Guardian, Sunday August 21, 2005 p4 24. The Sun, Monday August 18,2008 p18 25. Transprancy International corruption perception index report of 2007 & 2008)http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2007 retrieved on 10/07/09 http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2007 85
  • 6. This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage: http://www.iiste.org The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar