Assignment on Organization culture :)

1. Organizational Culture, Innovation and
Creativity
Organizational culture innovation and creativity are interrelated. Organizational culture plays a
vital role for encouraging innovation and creativity in any company. Organizational culture is
also an important determinant of organizational success.
Organizational Culture:
Organizational culture is culture starts with leadership, is reinforced with the accumulated
learning of organizational members and is powerful set of forces that determine human behavior.
There is no exact definition for organizational culture it is explained with mere examples. For
example in an organization, the way we do things around here i.e. consistent way of performing
tasks, solving problems , resolving conflicts, interaction with customers and treating employees
all these tasks comes together to form organizational culture.
Work culture is a totality of various levels of interaction among organizational factors and
organismic factors interact among themselves at various levels.
Functions of organizational culture are behavioral control, encouraging stability and provide
source of identity.
Nature of organizational culture:
The culture of an organization may reflect in various forms adopted by the organizations these
could be
physical infrastructure
routine behavior, language, ceremonies

2. gender equality, equality in payment
dominant values such as quality, efficiency
Philosophy that guides the organization’s policies towards it employees and customers
like customer first and customer is king and manner in which employee’s deals with
customers.
Individual factors wont reflect organizational culture but combined together reflect
organizational culture. Large organization has a dominant culture and also sub cultures
exist.
Dominant culture is followed by every one in organization and sub culture is followed by
only particular department or group.
Levels of organizational culture:

3. At level-1: organizational culture can be observed in the form of physical objects,
technology and other visible forms of behavior like ceremonies and rituals.
At level -2: there is greater awareness and internalization of culture values. people in the
organization try solutions of a problem in ways which have been tried and tested earlier.
At level-3: a process of conversion, where the group repeatedly observes that the method
that was tried works most of the time, it becomes the preferred solution and get converts
into dominant value orientation.
Common Myths about organizational culture:

4. Organizational culture is same as organizational climate: these are not same but two
different concepts in organization. Organization culture is a macro phenomenon which
deals with beliefs, assumptions, values and behaviors
reflecting commonality in people working together. Where as organizational climate is
micro phenomenon and reflects how employees in an organization feel about the
characteristics and quality of culture like morale, goodwill, employee relations, job
satisfaction etc.
Culture is same as group think: culture refers to shared assumptions and beliefs; it is
likely to cause confusion, it is characterized by symbols, beliefs and artifacts. Where as
group think refers to group member hiding any differences in how they feel and think and
behave in a certain way, it is mostly happened in face to face situations.
Culture is same as organization: culture is a result of sustained interaction among people
in organization and exists commonly in thoughts, feelings and behavior of people. Where
as organization consists of a set of expectations and a system of rewards and punishment
substained by rules, regulation and norms of behavior.
Culture is a social structure: social structure in various collectives exhibit tangible and
specific ways in which people relate to one another overtly. However, culture operates on
a system of unseen, abstract and emotionally loaded forms which guide organizational
members to deal with their physical and social needs.
Types of organizational culture:
Types are explained easily with the help of competing value frame work.

5. Competing value frame work has proven to be a helpful framework for assessing and profiling
the dominant cultures of organization. The first dimension places the values of flexibility,
discretion and dynamism at one end of the scale with stability, order and control on the other.
That means it emphasis on adaption and effectiveness. The second dimensions is marked by
internal orientation, integration and unity at one end of the scale with external orientation,
differentiation and rivalry on the other.
Hierarchy:
Hierarchical organizations share similarities with the stereotypical large bureaucratic
corporation. They are defined by stability and control as well as internal focus and integration.
They value standardization, control and well defined structure for authority and decision making.

6. Examples are MC Donald’s and government agencies like department of motor vehicles .
Market:
These companies are similar to hierarchical companies in terms of stability and control but differ
in terms of focus. These organizations have external orientation and they value differentiation
over integration. This began largely because of the competitive challenges from overseas. These
focused on relationships with suppliers, customers, contractors, unions, legislators, consultants
and regulators. These organizational feel that through external relations they can achieve success.
Organizations are more concerned on competitiveness and productivity.
Examples are General electric (GE), during leadership of former CEO jack wetch.
Clan:
Clan is similar to hierarchy in terms of inward focus with concern for integration but they
emphasis on discretion rather than the stability and control of control. The organizations
operated more like families hence they valued cohesion, a humane working environment. It
emphasis on teamwork and sociality, needs spaces that foster. Companies were made up of semi
–autonomous teams that had the ability to hire and fire their own members and employees were
encouraged to participate in determining how things would get done.
Example is Japanese firms in the late 70’s and 80’s.
Adhocracy:
Adhocracy is similar to clan in that emphasizes on discretion and flexibility but instead of inward
focus it focuses externally and concern for differentiation. This approach developed to deal with
the fast paced and volatile business environment, social, economic and technological changes
made older corporate attitudes and tactics less efficient. These organizations value flexibility,
adaptability.
Examples is Google, which develops innovative web tools, taking advantage of entrepreneurial
software engineers and cutting – edge processes and technologies.

7. Case Study:
Organizational culture at NIIT:
NIIT was founded in 1981 by two IIT, Delhi graduates, Rajendra S Pawar and Vijay K Thadani
with a vision of meeting basic requirements for IT talent in a world moving into an information
based economy. They had anticipations about the unpreparedness of Indian society to cope with
the forthcoming information age and adopted the mission “bringing people and computers
together, successfully”. Initially, NIIT delivered IT training to a broad spectrum of people – from
students seeking a career in computers to IT professionals requiring advanced skills; from
managers giving their careers an edge, to school children using computers as a learning too.
NIIT’s innovative offerings demonstrated the company’s ability to constantly renew itself to
anticipate future technology trends. From a computer training institute, NIIT has emerged as a
global IT solutions corporation offering knowledge solutions along with developing software
solutions along with developing software solutions. Headquartered in New Delhi, India, NIIT
operated through 100% subsidiaries in the US, Asia Pacific, Europe, and Japan and has
operations in about 40 countries.
Its mission keeps pace with the developments in the field of IT is evolved through organization
wide discussions which helps develop commitment among employees. The organization operates
with the help of task teams designed for specific customer requirements for a specific period to
carry out the work. Team culture and openness are emphasized a great deal. NIIT,s corporate
culture focuses on values such as quality, creativity, and customer satisfaction. The quality
culture of NIIT has been the result of the sustained efforts of its management – perpetuated
through induction, socialization, reinforcement, innovation, and concern for internal and external
customers. The quality culture is ingrained at NIIT in such a way that the priority is to prevent
mistakes rather than rectify them. Also, quality efforts are backed by results, which are rewarded.
Employees are treated as intellectual capital and are looked after well. The happy and committed
employees ensure customer satisfaction and this has got them wide acceptance across the globe.
It has got well designed mechanisms for monitoring the quality for its products, services and or
software processes. Most of NIIT’s businesses have ISO 9000 certification. The work culture at
NIIT has gone through all the stages of culture development like symbols, behavior,

8. organizational values, attitudes, and shared assumptions, and probably this is the reason it has
been able to sustain it.
PRO’S OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE:
Strong organizational culture will attract high level talent. Best people can be choosy and
they will strongly consider whether a company has effective organizational culture and
how workers get along with each other.
Strong organizational culture will help to keep your top level talent.
A strong culture creates energy and momentum. Once a strong organizational culture is
built, it will gain a momentum of its own and will help to allow people to feel valued and
express themselves freely. It will have positive influence on organization.
Strong organizational culture will change mindset of employees positively like loving
work they are doing etc. which intern increase efficiency.
It will also make everyone more efficient and successful.
Con’s of organizational culture:
Positive change won’t occur if we don’t make it a practice to
Communicate a sound rationale for every undertaking and change
Appoint the right people to the right position
Seize upon every opportunity to improve the culture whether it is from your adversaries,
competitors or simply some one else’s misfortune.
Innovation:

9. In today’s ever-changing economic landscape, inventiveness has become a key factor
influencing strategic planning. Innovation generally refers to the creation of better or
more effective products, processes, technologies, or ideas that are accepted
by markets, governments, and society. Innovation differs from invention or renovation in
that innovation generally signifies a substantial positive change compared to incremental
changes.
The goal of innovation is to create business value by developing ideas from mind to
market. Most of companies find tremendously difficult to achieve.
Drivers of innovation:
There are basically four drivers which will gradually transform the manner in which
companies innovate and for each driver new innovative principles will arise.
Co-creating value with customers and tapping knowledge about users
Companies have to open their innovation processes. Companies must listen and
dialogue with customers and give them access to all kinds of information. Customer’s
needs and behavior must be considered as a integral part of a company’s strategy and
business model. Companies must be transparent and evaluate risk with their customers.
Tapping hidden knowledge from customers and involving users in the beginning of
innovation processes requires different knowledge and competencies than has previously
been necessary for innovation.
Global knowledge sourcing and collaborative networks:
Companies will form collaborative networks and engage themselves in binding
innovation partnerships. No single companies regardless of size will posses all the
knowledge and resources needed to innovate on its own. Hence companies will have to

10. access and combine globally-dispersed knowledge on a larger scale than ever seen
before.
Global challenges as a driver of innovation:
Companies will constantly search for new business opportunities, and they will
realize that global challenges such as climate change, the supply of clean water,
epidemics and social needs constitute a huge new market. By creating new and more
responsible and sustainable solutions, companies can cultivate new business
opportunities. ‘Corporate social innovation’ may be an important new business area for
private companies and a core driver of innovation.
Example: Global challenges such as climate change, access to clean water and
various social needs have until now been regarded as political challenges and not as
business challenges, implying that the responsibility for finding solutions rested with the
political world. Companies responded to requests and demands put forward by public
sector institutions by providing the required service or product.
Public sector challenges as a driver of innovation:
The demand for innovation in public services would appear obvious. However,
the difficulties also seem quite substantial. Citizens look for more individualized welfare
services of higher quality, but the amount of resources allocated to the welfare system are
under ressure, and the system’s ability to innovate can be questioned. These challenges
open a huge territory for private companies if they can find ways for innovating with the
owners of welfare institutions, but the path into public services is a road with many
political obstacles.

11. Types of Innovation
There are three main types of innovation (process, product/service, and strategy), each of which
can vary in the degree of newness (incremental to radical) and impact (sustaining versus
Discontinuous).
Process Innovation:
Process innovation became an important with the rise of the quality and continuous improvement
movements and, then again, with the more recent attention directed at change management,
organizational learning and knowledge management.
Product/Service Innovation:
Incremental product/service innovation is oriented toward improving the features and
functionality of existing products and services. Radical product/service innovation is oriented
toward creating wholly new products and/or services. Product life cycles, in particular, have
become shorter and shorter, causing business survival to depend on new product development
and, increasingly, on the speed of innovation in order to develop and bring new products to
market faster than the competition. Organizations must direct
greater attention to new product development, while maintaining and improving their existing
products. Discontinuous products and services are increasingly likely with ever-faster new
product/service development. Organizations must be constantly on the lookout for discontinuous
new products and/or services. Although product/service innovation and process innovation are
not the same thing, they are often interconnected.
Strategy or Business Concept Innovation:
It is, of course, possible to incrementally improve one’s business strategy but radical business
concept innovation is now paramount. If radical business concept innovation is successful in
accomplishing these objectives,

12. Radical innovation:
Radical innovation is confronted with uncertainties in both technological and market
aspects. In radical innovation requires new knowledge and new resources and therefore it
is considered as competence destroying. In an radical innovation we should create market
for over product.
Incremental innovation:
It’s a step by step process. It will build up on existing knowledge and resources within a
certain company so it is considered as competence enhancing. It involves modest
technological changes and the existing products on the market will remain competitive.

13. Innovation Zones:

14. In product life cycle, an innovation has to taken place at various zones at various stages of
life cycle.
Product leadership zones are privileged during the growth phase
Customer intimacy and operational excellence zones are privileged at mature phase.
Category renewal is for categories that have lost the ability to sustain future value
creation.
In product leadership zone: there can be basically four types of innovation
1) Disruptive innovation: this type of innovation creates new market categories based on
discontinuous technology change.
2) Application innovation: it is also called solution innovation, trying to develop new
markets for existing products.
3) Product innovation: for existing markets, innovating new products. This form of
innovation is normally highly dependent on fast time to market.

15. 4) Platform innovation: These types of innovation interpose a simplifying layer to mask
an underlying legacy of complexity and complication, thereby freeing a next
generation of offers to focus on new value propositions.
Customer intimacy zone:
There are our types of innovations:
1) Line-extension innovation: this type of innovation makes structural modifications
to an established offer to create a distinctive subcategory. Goal is to expand
market share with existing product.
2) Enhancement innovation: this type of innovation continues the trajectory begun
by line extension, driving innovation into finer and finer elements. The goal is to
improve existing offers in existing markets by modifying a single dimension,
there by reawakening customer interest.
3) Experiential innovation: it’s based on ultimate refinement of customer intimacy,
the value is based not on differentiating the functionality but rather the experience
of the offering. It is particularly suited to consumer markets.
4) Marketing innovation: this type of innovation focuses on differentiating the
interaction with a prospective customer during the purchase process.
Operational excellence zone:
1) Value- engineering innovation: this type of innovation extracts cost from the
materials and manufacturing of an established offer without changing its external
properties.

16. 2) Integration innovation: this type of innovation reduces the customer’s cost of
maintaining a complex operation by integrating its many disparate elements into
single centrally managed system.
3) Process innovation: this type of innovation focuses on improving profit margins
by extracting waste not from the offer itself but from the enabling processes that
produce it.
4) Value migration innovation: this typeof innovation consist of redirecting the
business model away from a commoditizing element in the market’s value chain
towards one richer in margins.
Category renewal zone:
1) Organic innovation: the uses its internal resources to reposition itself into a
growth category. For example solving problem faced by most valued customers
etc.
2) Acquisition innovation: it solves the problem of category renewal externally
through merger and acquisitions.
Creativity:
Creativity refers to the phenomenon whereby a person creates something new that has some
kind of value. What counts as "new" may be in reference to the individual creator, or to the
society or domain within which the novelty occurs. What counts as "valuable" is similarly
defined in a variety of ways.A creative product is one that is different from all previously
existing products intended for similar purposes, along one or more substantial dimensions. A
certain consideration of context is appropriate in the evaluation of novelty.
Organizational culture influence on creativity and innovation:

17. Organizational support is required for creativity and innovation. Various organizational factors
that effect creativity and innovation are
1) Organizational encouragement encompasses several aspects, including encouragement of risk
taking and idea generation, supportive evaluation of ideas, collaborative idea flow, and participative
management and decision making. Open flow of communication across groups in the organization is
required for creativity and innovation. Organizational structures and a culture that supports, or perhaps
more appropriately does not punish, this type of communication will be more likely to have more effective
creativity and innovation.
2) Supervisory encouragement Supervisory encouragement includes clarity of team goals, supervisory
support of the team’s work and ideas, and an environment where open interactions are supported.
Innovation effectiveness is positively associated with group cohesiveness, provided that an open,
Confrontive climate for conflict resolution exists within the innovation team. Absent such a climate,
cohesiveness is negatively related to the level of innovation in the team.
3) Work group encouragement: work group encouragement focuses on diversity among group
members and constructive challenging among team members. Creative performance is increased when
diversity is allowed, when people with dissimilar frames of reference can exchange ideas, and when the
organization can effectively integrate creative personalities into the organizational mainstream. The
organization that possesses these attributes must have a culture that strongly values, tolerates, and even
embraces diversity, particularly diversity of personalities.
4) Freedom and autonomy: Freedom and autonomy here are related to granting and allowing freedom
and autonomy to employees for determining the means by which to achieve a goal, not necessarily
autonomy for selecting what goals to go after.
5) Resources: resources refer to money and time, not providing ample time lead to distrust
and burnout. Providing more time than required can take way sense of challenge and
decrease creative performance. Enough amount of money should be provided so that
employees will focus on work rather than finding resources.
6) Control: it is one factor that acts as organizational obstacle for creativity and innovation.
Control in decision making, control of information flow, or even perceived control in the form of reward
systems that put too much emphasis on increasing extrinsic motivation. A culture that supports and
encourages control will result in diminished creativity and innovation. The primary reason for this is that
control negatively affects intrinsic motivation.
According to burns and stalker
Mechanistic organizations were characterized as hierarchical, highly structured organizations
with well-defined, formal roles and positions relative to others in the organization, with

18. communication flowing primarily vertically. Organic organizations, by contrast, were typified by
their fluid organizational design, with departments and teams forming and reforming to address
new problems and opportunities, with communication flowing primarily laterally. Organic
organizations form to deal with unpredictability and volatility in an organization’s environment.
Compared with a mechanistic organization, an organic one facilitated greater creativity and
innovation. Centralized decision making may enhance an organization’s ability to implement
innovations, particularly in a more stable environment.
According to amabile,
There are six support scales that would differentiate between high- creativity climate and low
creativity climate including (a) organizational encouragement, (b) supervisory encouragement,
(c) Work group supports, (d) freedom, (e) sufficient resources, and (f) challenge.
Work has focused on three ingredients for creative output (a) domain expertise, (b) creative-
thinking skills, and (c) intrinsic motivation.
Acc to rosabeth M.kanter,
Innovation is most likely to occur in organizations that (a) have integrative structures, (b)
emphasize diversity, (c) have multiple structural linkages inside and outside the organization, (d)
have intersecting territories, (e) have collective pride and faith in people’s talents, and (f)
emphasize collaboration and teamwork.
Case study:

19. Organizational culture that facilitates radical innovation in a
mature small to medium sized company
A case study of a small to medium sized firm based in the UK was used as a basis for examining
the innovation culture that facilitates radical innovation. A case study provides the opportunity to
investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context, especially when the
boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident. The firm in the case study
is Cerulean, an international company that designs, manufactures, markets and supports a range
of quality measurement equipment for the tobacco industry and specialized tube packing
machines world-wide. Over the last ten years the company has grown to be a dominant player in
its international market sectors but now finds itself unable to provide the “stream of innovative
new products” that it believes is necessary to survive and grow. The company had a history of
incremental innovation but had been unsuccessful in generating radical innovations from within.
The perception from within the company was that the organizational culture –“the way we do
things round here” was inhibiting radical innovation. Emphasis was placed on successful
outcomes, risk was avoided and speculative or exploratory developments were avoided, in order
to focus on product enhancements. Recent product introductions have been “me too” products
that responded to a competitor offering or an evolution of an existing product. The last example
of a product that included a radical innovation was conceived about five years ago. This radical
innovation came from the use of an external consultancy to create the concept that was later
developed and productionized within Cerulean. In order for the company to prosper, it was
believed that it had to develop the capability to develop new lines of products as well as
improving existing ones. Regaining the entrepreneurial spirit of the company from ten years
previously was desired, but in a manner that could co-exist along with the existing business.
Recent years had seen many improvements in using modern methods and procedures and these
were also essential for efficient operation of the business. Cerulean is an operating division of
Molins plc. It has a head office in Milton Keynes in the UK. Design, development and
manufacturing are all carried out exclusively at the Milton Keynes head office. This facility also
contains the administration functions, Sales and Customer Service for the Europe, Middle East
and Africa regions. There are service, or sales and service centers in the USA, Brazil, Venezuela,
South Africa, Germany, India, Malaysia, and China. There are 105 people employed by the

20. company with around 70 of these being based at the Milton Keynes head office. The
development team within Cerulean was the subject of the research. This is a team of around 15
development engineers with length of service ranging from less than one year to over thirty
years. The team comprises skills in mechanical, electrical, electronic and software engineering.
The nine attributes of Cerulean’s existing organization culture that enable and inhibit the
development of a radical innovation culture such as Freedom, attitude to risk, development,
external confidence, internal confidence, external perspective, clear objective, team constitution
and company infrastructure.
But for radical innovation in cerulean’s, The change is necessary in Development team to change
their underlying beliefs about risk taking to a position where risky decisions are believed to be
opportunities for exploration and exploitation. By changing the basic assumptions and values,
behavior changes can be embedded in the organization as “the way we do things around here”,
thus leading to the desired radical innovation culture. In this way a social heritage for “radical-
ness” could be created.
References:
1) Introduction to Organizational culture
2) Organizational culture: is it a plus or minus in your organization by Charlie Connolly
3) What Do We Know about Developing and Sustaining a Culture of Innovation by
L.Aiman-Smith 2004
4) Four organizational culture types by bruce M.tharp
5) Innovation by Kathryn A.baker
6) New nature of innovation by jose santos, dirk pillat

21. 7) Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the
Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development by Laird D. McLean
8) Case study: Developing an organizational culture that facilitates radical innovation in a
mature small to medium sized company: Emergent findings
Book:
Organizational behavior by Stephen p.robbins