Выступление на пленарном заседании Kazan Urban Forum

1. +
CITY AS OUR FUTURE
@ KAZAN URBAN FORUM 2014
NORLIZA HASHIM
MANAGING DIRECTOR
AJM Planning and Urban Design Group Sdn Bhd
and
SECRETARY GENERAL
Eastern Organisation for Planning and Human Settlements

2. A World of Cities
n Today – it’s a world of Cities
Kuala Lumpur
Singapore
Jakarta
London
Sydney
Melbourne
Dubai
Johannesburg
Perth
Bogota
Cape Town
Vancouver
Toronto
Florida
Nairobi
Copenhagen
Brisbane
Hong Kong

3. 1804 1927 1960 1975 1993 1999 2006 2009 2012 2050
1 billion 2 billion 3 billion 4 billion 5.3 billion 6 billion 6.5 billion 6.8 billion 7 billion 9.2 billion
More People Now Lives in Cities
51% (3.5B) of the world’s population now lives in cities
42% of cities has more than 1 million population
28 megacities (above 10M population) – 13% of population
7 out of 10World’s Largest Urban Areas are in Asia (2013)

4. Cities Now Compete For Same Economic Space

5. Cities are the actors of Global Economy
They configure the more advanced of economic clusters
The world's top 100 cities generate approximately half of the world's total economic output.
80% of US economic outputs comes from cities and metros
78% of China’s GDP comes from cities and metros (recently urbanised)
1 23

6. Cities Competitiveness
Globally, economic activity is highly concentrated in key cities in each country

7. Cities Design & Management
Essential for Quality of Life, Social Cohesion, Magnetism
and Attraction of Talent

8. Cities Produce 80% ofWorld CO2 Emission
Design of Cities is Key to Sustainability of Our Planet and to Promote
Greener Environment & Economy

9. Working Partners
• People now choose
the city where they
want to live; before
they chose the job
they wanted
• Efficient and
liveable cities are
the keys to
successful national
development
A ChangingWorld

10. Source: Economic Intelligence Unit, Price Waterhouse Coopers
Trend line of countries’ expected spending according to wealth
Liveability &Wealth
There is a strong linkage between the wealth of cities and the
quality of life within cities

11. About Malaysia
POPULATION MALAYSIA
• 29 million (2011), (21M- Peninsular Malaysia)
TOTAL LAND AREA
• 330,803 km² (200,565 sq.km – East Malaysia)
EMPLOYMENT/GDP GROWTH
• 12.3 million (2011)/ 5.2% (2012- 2787.7B USD)
URBAN POPULATION 2011
• 63.8% of the population lives in Urban areas
Malaysia and South East Asia Population Density (person per sq km – 86person/sqkm)
Kuala Lumpur Johor Bharu Georgetown, Penang Malacca Ipoh
Cities Competitiveness
Needs Strong and Holistic Urban Policies

12. Malaysia’s Response to Urban Challenge
Holistic Planning and Development System
VISION 2020
TIER 1 : NATIONAL PLANNING
NATIONAL
PHYSICAL
PLAN
SECTORAL
POLICIES/
PLANS
5 - YEAR
MALAYSIA
PLAN
TIER 2 : REGIONAL / STATE PLANNING
STATE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
SECTORAL
POLICIES/
PLANS
TIER 3 : LOCAL PLANNING
LOCAL
PLAN
SPECIAL AREA
PLAN
REGIONAL /
STRUCTURE
PLAN

13. 1VISION
Several Tiers of Transformation Programmes

14. • Ini$ated
under
Economic
Transforma$on
Program
2010
• Focused
on
Klang
Valley
• 3,428
km2
or
342,726
hectares
• 6.4
M
popula$on
(2010)
• 10.0
M
popula$on
(2020)
• 10
LPA’s
and
2
States
GREATER
KL/KLANG
VALLEY
• Ini$ated
in
9th
MP
(2005-­‐2010)
• Focused
on
Five
Flagships
• 2,217
km2
or
222,577
hectares
• 1.6
M
popula$on
(2010)
• 3.0
M
popula$on
(2025)
• 5
LPA’s
and
3
Districts
ISKANDAR
MALAYSIA
Na2onal
Physical
Plan
Government’s
ini2a2ves
Georgetown
Conurbation
Johor Bahru
Conurbation
Kuala
Lumpur
Conurbation
Georgetown
Conurbation
GT
Conurba$on
Highway
Federal
Road
Major
Road
Railway
Kangar
Alor
Setar
George
Town
GEORGETOWN
CONNURBATION
• Iden$fied
in
NPP2
• Focused
on
Penang,
South
Kedah
&
North
Perak
• 4,444
km2
or
444,000
hec
• 2.7
M
popula$on
(2010)
• 9
LPA’s
and
3
States
Acknowledge Role of Cities as
Economic Regions

15. Acknowledge Role of Cities as
Economic Regions – Greater Kuala Lumpur

16. Greater Kuala Lumpur Blueprint

17. Greater Kuala Lumpur Blueprint

19. WorkingDraft-LastModified8/2/20102:45:57PM
Greater KL/KV’s has a strong value proposition for
global and regional MNCs
▪ High investor protection index of 8.67
▪ Takes only 11 days to start a business
▪ Low corporate tax rate of 25%
▪ Prime office rental of RM 90-120 / sq m per mth
▪ Strong skilled labour index of 6.7
Business environment
▪ Low cost of living compared to Hong Kong
and Singapore
▪ High quality of life index of 7.98
▪ Strong university education index of 7.02
Liveability
Key value proposition
of Greater KL/KV
▪ Connectivity to major
LastModified8/2/20102:45:57PMPrinted7/27/201011:38:55PM
Within 2 hour
flight to
Singapore and
Jakarta
Within 6
hour flight
to Shanghai,
Hong Kong,
and Beijing
▪ 22 mln passenger
transported by plane
yearly
▪ Total R&D expenditure
per capita in Malaysia is
RM 180
▪ Qualified engineer index
of 7.17
▪ Technological regulation
index of 7.48
Infrastructure
▪ Attract & retain talent index of 7.8
▪ High English proficiency
▪ Targeting 5% population growth
Human Capital
▪ Connectivity to major
markets
▪ Cost reduction of 20~30%
▪ Highly educated human
capital
▪ Rising infrastructure level
▪ High quality of living

20. WorkingDraft-LastModified8/2/20102:45:57PM
1.0
0.7
2.3
5.8
9.8
4.0
Population and employment demand in GKL
mln population
Foreign
Incremental
immigration
12%
40%
Baseline
population
growth
48%
Local
Incremental
immigration
1.7 mln new jobs created by
2020 through baseline growth
and NKEA initiatives
GKL/KV’s population will need to grow to 10 mln by 2020
to fulfill employment demand and create RM120 bil GNI
LastModified8/2/20102:45:57PMPrinted7/27/201011:38:55PM
Incremental GNI Impact
RM ~ 120 billion
Based on economic activity provided
by other initiatives in Kuala Lumpur
3.3
2.5
Employment
20091
Baseline
employment
growth2
Non-active
population
2009
Current
2010
population
GKL 2020
projected
population
Incremental
non-active
population
NKEA
employment
growth
1 Based on 63.7% Labour Force Participation Rate and 68.1% active labor age (15~64)
2 MOHR estimates based on baseline population growth
▪ Target 500,000 (12%)
through the attraction of
foreign talent (overseas
Malaysians or expatriates)
▪ Talent attraction initiatives
to be implemented by
Talent Corp.

23. +
PLANNING
EVOLVES
We need to know we are before we
evolve and change
Performance
Evalua2on
• Content Gap
• Performance
Evaluation
• A Scorecard

24. 24CDP 2005-2025
The CDP formulates the overall development framework, vision and key directions
in order to strengthen the physical, economic and social development of IM.
CDP 2006 - 2025 is divided into seventeen (17) chapters, in two main sections:
The initiatives in CDP
• Function of authority;
• Enhancement of quality of living
environment;
• Management of the use of land;
• Management and promotion of
urbanization;
• Protection, preservation and
enhancement of natural
environmental resources,
agricultural resources, parks and
open spaces;
• Protection of the natural coastal
environment;
• Revitalization of JB City Centre;
• Provision, integration and
coordination of urban;
• Infrastructure and utility services;
• Improvement of urban linkages;
• Promote of Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD); and
• Targeted commercial
development.
Proposal for the
development in
Iskandar Malaysia
6 Key
Directions
NATURAL AND
GREEN
ENVIRONMENT
5 Key
Directions
THE COASTAL
ZONE
6 Key
Directions
JOHOR BAHRU
CITY CENTRE
2 Key
Directions
URBAN LINKAGE
SYSTEM
11 Key
Directions
URBAN
INFRASTRUCTUR
E
10
Strategic
Thrusts
SPATIAL
DEVELOPMENT
7 Strategic
Thrusts
SOCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
3 Strategic
Thrusts
TRANSIT-
ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT
4 Areas of
Focus
REGULATORY,
LEGAL &
INSTITUTIONAL
7
Initiatives
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT

25. 25CDP 2005-2025
Key Indicators And Strategic Thrust Set By CDP
Targeted Economic
Indicators
Focused Development At 5
Promoted Flagships
Proposed Development
Corridor
Improved Accessibility Through
Regional and East-West Linkages
Strengthen International Linkages &
Leverage On Singapore
2005 2025 2010
Population
size (Million)
1.3 3.0 1.6
GDP (PPP) (in
USD Million)
20 93.3 37.8
GDP per
capita (PPP) in
USD
14,790 31,100 NA
Labour Force 0.624 Mil 1.46 Mil 0.722
Mil
Employment 0.610 Mil 1.428 Mil 0.703
Mil
Unemploymen
t
3-4 % 1.8% 2.6%
Jobs Created NA 817,500 93,400

26. IM just entered its second phase.
Progressive & Sustainable Investment
and Economic Development
PHASE 1
Planning
Foundation
Building
PHASE 2
Strengthening
&
Growth
PHASE 3
Sustain
&
Innovate
Evolution
2007-2009 2016-20252010-2015
IM Strategic Roadmap
CDP 2005-2025
CDP also sets the framework for the development implementation of IM.
CDP identified Iskandar Regional
Development Authority (IRDA) as
the regional authority with main
functions to:
• Develop
• Facilitate and regulate
approvals
• Promote social benefits to
community
Iskandar Investment Berhad has
been identified as super
developer apart from other
existing property players.
26

27. 27
All blueprints will be examined against the relevant CDP 2006-2025 strategic thrusts
and key directions.
Economic
Development
(7 strategic
thrusts)
CDP 2006-2025
strategic thrusts and
key directions
Social
Development
(7 strategic
thrusts)
Physical
Development
(10 strategic
thrusts)
Natural and
Green
Development
(6 key
directions)
Coastal Zone
(5 key
directions)
Johor Bahru
City Centre
(5 key
directions)
Urban
Infrastructure
(11 key
directions)
Urban Linkages
including TOD
(5 strategic
thrusts)
Regulatory,
Legal and
Institutional
(4 areas of
focus)
Commercial
Development
CDP 2006-2025
strategic thrusts
and key
directions
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Investment & Marketing Strategic
3. Tg. Puteri – Tourism
4. Human Capital Blueprint
1. Social Development
2. Planning Design & Guideline on
Housing, Neighbourhood and
Facilities
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Shoreline Management Plan
3. Integrated Solid Waste
Management
4. Transport 2010-2030 Masterplan
5. Renewable Energy & Energy
Efficiency
6. Environmental Planning Blueprint
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Shoreline Management Plan
3. Environmental Planning
Blueprint
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Shoreline Management Plan
3. Environmental Planning
Blueprint
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Area Character
Statement
1. Integrated Solid Waste
Management
2. Renewable Energy &
Energy Efficiency
3. Electricity Blueprint
4. Drainage & Stormwater
Management
5. Information &
Communication
Technology
1. Integrated Land Use
2. Transport 2010-2030
Masterplan
3
77
16
41
33
10
23
95
27
26
24
66
9
95
66
4
95
66
3
24
27
24
2
44
20
2
26
Blueprints
Initiatives/
Programme
s
Blueprints
Initiatives/
Programme
Content Gap Analysis

28. 28
Median-
83%
%
83 Improvement required
especially data availability
Ready to be adopted to CDP
5Blueprints are ready to be adopted
into CDP, namely:
1. Environment Planning
2. Shoreline Management
3. Area Character Statement
4. Transportation Masterplan
5. Tanjung Puteri- Tourism
Development
9blueprint only managed to below
median-83%.There are:
1. Social Development
2. Investment and marketing strategy
3. Human Capital
4. Safety and security
5. Planning and Design Guidelines for
Housing, Neighbourhood and
Facilities
6. ICT Blueprint
7. Road Layout design
8. Maintenance and Operational Plan
9. Housing Management
19 Iskandar blueprints (except GIS Enterprise) have been evaluated based on content gap analysis.
5 main elements has been considered into analysis, namely address relevant CDP strategic thrust,
objectives of blueprint, comprehensive of coverage, data, sustainability and programme/
readiness to roll out.
Scorecard For The BlueprintSocialDevelopment
InvestmentandMarketingStrategy
HumanCapital
SafetyandSecurity
Electricity
DrainageandStormwater
IntegratedlandUse
Environmental
Planning
ShorelineManagement
PlanningandDesign
GuidelinesforHousing,
NeighbourhoodandFacilities
ICTBlueprint
AreaCharacterStatement
RenewableEnergyandEnergyEfficiency
TransportationMasterplan
TanjungPuteri-TourismDevelopment
RoadLayoutDesign
MaintenanceandOperationalPlan
HousingManagement
Integrated
Solid
Waste
Management
Blueprints
5 main criteria:
1. Address relevant CDP Strategic Thrusts
2. Meet objectives of the blueprint
3. Comprehensive coverage of subject/
topic
4. Data availability / analysis
5. Sustainability
6. Programme/ Initiatives/ readiness to
roll out

29. +
Planning is Best When
Its From The People
Always Engage and Listen and Act
and Plan Accordingly

30. People’s Perception and Views
These key concerns has guided the plan making process as people’s buy-in will ensure
effectiveness of the Plan.
More parks & green
spaces
Improve basic
public amenities
and facilities
Affordable
housing price
More public
transportation facilities
and coverage
Better quality of life and
environment
Save mangrove
Conserve and
preserve local
history, culture
and heritage
Redevelop
abandoned project
sites and
brownfield areas
Effective and systematic
administration & governance
Less foreign workers and
should give more chance
or priority to local people
Safety &
Security
WE WANT……
More fun, relax
and recreational
facilities
The success of the Iskandar Malaysia should not be measured by the
number of jobs created or development process that have been
implemented, but rather through the level of wellbeing or of the
people in Iskandar Malaysia.
A success development should achieve all the necessities and
needs of the people and providing a liveable place to call home.
By En. Manndzri Bin Nasib, Vice President of Johor State Youth Council
Affordable in
Cost of living

31. VISIT/ MEETING WITH
RELEVANT ORGANIZATION
& AGENCIES
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION
ISKANDAR CITY FORUM

32. • Federal Territory Ministry
• Economic Planning Unit
• Ministry of Trade and Industry
• DBKL Technical Departments
• MTPKL
• Ministry of Transport & Rapid/Star/Putra
• TNB, Telcos, Utility Providers, Wilayah
Persekutuan Infrastructure
• Multimedia Development Corporation
• Relevant Consultants
• Hotels Association
• Travel Agents
• Stakeholders
• Banks, Insurance, Chamber of
Commerce and Stock Broking
• Disabled Group
• Youth representative
• Residents representative
• Relevant NGO’s
• Relevant Consultants
• Hotels Association/Travel Agents
• Stakeholders, Banks, Insurance,
Chamber of Commerce and Stock
Broking
• Disabled group representative
TWG 1
Legal, Land, Implementation &
Management
TWG 2
Use Class Rules
TWG 3
World Class City & Economic
Growth
TWG 4
Land Use &
Environment
TWG 5
Transportation
TWG 6
Utilities
TWG 2
Community
Development
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPS
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION
BRAINSTORMING AND WORKSHOP
FGD
World Class Definition for
Kuala Lumpur
FGD
Business & Commerce
Tourism
Informal Sectors
FGD
Disable
Youth
Single Mothers
FGD
Special Areas Bukit Jalil-
Seputeh & Bandar Tun
Razak
FGD
Special Areas City Centre
& Damansara-Penchala
FGD
Special Areas Sentul-
Menjalara & Wangsa
Maju-Maluri
BRAINSTORMING
World Class Definition for
Kuala Lumpur
BRAINSTORMING
Business & Commerce
Tourism
Informal Sectors
BRAINSTORMING
Disable
Youth
Single Mothers
BRAINSTORMING
Special Areas Bukit Jalil-
Seputeh & Bandar Tun
Razak
BRAINSTORMING
Special Areas City Centre
& Damansara-Penchala
BRAINSTORMING
Special Areas Sentul-
Menjalara & Wangsa
Maju-Maluri
MEMBERSLevel of Consultations

33. +
A New Paradigm of
Planning
It is important for people to relate to
the city……

34. 34
Elements Current Approach New Emphasis
City Design Making the city physically attractive. Making well-being, quality of life and liveability
the core of any urban project.
Real estate development driven city-
making.
Developments are guided by public interest
principles, including aesthetics.
Planning physical projects. Planning communities and neighbourhoods.
Development is by type of land use;
residential, commercial and industrial.
Mixed uses are predominant to encourage
living, working and leisure activities within the
same compact area.
Transport Transportation network are designed to
move vehicles via roads and highways.
Transportation networks are designed to move
people, with a focus on public transport as the
primary spine, supported by a pedestrian-
friendly street network.
Movement is seen to be a transportation
network and traffic engineering issue.
Mobility, accessibility and seamless
connectivity are the desired outcomes.
Environmental, activities and
culture
Environment and natural resources are free
goods.
Urban projects account for the environmental
cost of development.
Emphasis on providing urban infrastructure
and services.
Beyond infrastructure and services, culture is an
asset and drives a city’s distinctiveness.
Waste is disposed. Waste is a resource to be recycled and reused
for example via waste-to-energy initiatives.
Governance Planning and provision of infrastructure is
predominantly a central/federal role.
Greater collaboration and cooperation with
local authorities to incorporate frontline input
into planning and decision making.
Limited civil participation and consultation. Consultative and bottom-up approach to
planning and design with the voice of citizens
and businesses forming an important input.
A
new
paradigm
on
city
making

35. Communities Today & Communities of the Future
Different Desire
City Hall Community
Centres
Theatres/
Museums
TransitHospitals
Coffee
Shops
Libraries
Schools
Civic Squares
Community Gathering
Spaces/Parks
Churches
Offices
Sustainable Communities
of the Future
Theatres/
Museums
Transit
Hospital
Coffee
Shops
Libraries
Schools
Parks
Community
Centres
City Hall
ChurchesOffices
Communities Today

36. Make our Cities = People Cities
People Cities = Livable Cities
City Plan Scale
Birds eye view / Aircraft perspective
Site Plan Scale
Roof top /Helicopter perspective
People Scale
Eye level / 5 km/h perspective
Its about the Right Scale that makes a city friendly and comfortable………..

37. +
The creation of spaces for
communities that allows
for a sense of belonging.
Its about Place Making
How should they be planned in the
context of demographic, economic and
technological changes?
- Youth Spaces
- Active public realms
- Market Square
The Soul of the City
Its not about buildings

38. 1
Public Realm
Quality and
functional public
realm
2
Visual
Character
and
Identity
Reflect an
innovative and
imaginative use
of space, form
and materials
3
Legibility and
Orientation
Land parcels,
transport networks,
streets and parks -
be designed as a
coherent whole by
the provision of
good connections
4
Permeability
and
Connectivity
Design enables all
forms of traffic,
pedestrian
and vehicular to
move easily
through the site
5
Safety and
Security
Provide defensible
space and ensure
safety through
environmental
design
6
Varying
Density
and Use
Enables vibrant
and active
community
Urban design is about making connections between people and places,movement and urban form,nature and the built fabric.
Urban design draws together the many strands of place-making,environmental stewardship,social equity and economic
viability into the creation of places with distinct beauty and identity.
Urban Design is important to a City Centre
Urban design blends architecture, landscape architecture and urban planning together

39. 1
Respond to
Community
Needs
Identifies the likely
composition and
needs of new
communities, and
how these will be
addressed in a
timely way.
2
Building
Community
Capacity
Community
engagement and
processes to
achieve a strong
sense of belonging
and identity in a
new community.
3
Economic
Opportunity
Generate local
employment
opportunities
4
Healthy and
Active
Community
Creating safe
environments that
offer
opportunities for
healthy activity,
recreation and
social interaction.
5
Lifelong
Learning
Access to
education, and
training
opportunities
at different
stages of the
lifecycle
About Community Well-being

40. +
Kazan Smart City
Not Just a New Township
development
Its About New Urban Planning

41. Several workshop were held and as much challenges have been identified.
“ Where performing in the 6 characteristics, built on the ‘smart’
integration of economy, environment and social with focus on
investments of human and social capital, combining hard and soft
infrastructure that fuel sustainable economic development, a high
quality of life, wise management of natural resources, through
participatory governance ”
“TheParticipants
WantsASustainable
KazanSmartCity”
Stakeholders Input STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT
WORKSHOPPARTICIPANTSSTAKEHOLDERSVISITATION

42. Local Partner Input (TIGP)
Concept Option 1
Presentation by TIGP regarding initial concept plan,
and sharing of the site from the perspective of
accessibility, current use, strengths and weaknesses.
Concept Option 2 Concept Option 3
Developing Strategies Concepts for Master Plan Sketch Book 1 : KSC Mobilization Workshop

43. +
Closing Thoughts
If urbanization is not managed it
will not yield the desired results.
And
It Needs
• Institution tailored to the 21st Century
• Spatial autonomy
• Local level accountability
• Innovative solutions
• Sustainability is in-built
• Not multicultural but intercultural
• Spatially blind policies particularly in relation to social
infrastructure
• Incentive to enable urban regeneration; not only urban
expansion
• Higher standards and better designs
• Continuous Monitoring
What It Needs

44. +
Closing Thoughts
We Need to Reinvent the City
City as a Living Space
– Public health, safety security
– Mobility accessibility
– Open spaces and private space
– Inner city regeneration / renewal
– Affordable Housing
City as a Transaction Hub
– Economic Revitalization
– Regional / international hub
– Creativity Innovation
– Connectivity Logistics
– Microenterprise / corporate social
entrepreneurship
City as a Cultural Hub
– Cultural Civic Facilities
– Living Heritage Endangered Trades
– Entertainment Culture
– Cultural Diversity
– Creative Industries

45. +
Closing Thoughts
We Need to Reinvent the City
City as a Knowledge Hub
– Repository of Knowledge
– Learning Living
– Libraries Museum
– Living History Culture
– Research, Innovation Development Centres
City as a Civic Democratic Space
– Urban Governance Popular Participation
– Social Inclusion Sense of Community
– Poverty
– Cultural Diversity
– Access to Public Facilities
City as a Sustainable Space
– Greening, urban form and planning
– Parks Gardens
– Waste Management
– Walkable Cyclable
– Ecological sustainability
– Carbon footprint energy

46. +
Put People in The
Heart of Planning
Cities
Hub + Home
Inclusive
Respectful
Vibrant Creative
Excellence Driven
Welcoming
Intimate
Surprising
Non-Conformist
Young
Pro-active
Sustainable,
Liveable City
Value-Based Approach vs
Physical Planning Approach

47. +
THANKYOU
WE NEED TO DESIGN CITIES AS ONE BIG
INCLUSIVE SPACE…. EQUITY
EQUALITY
norliza@apudg.com