Procurement executives, though continually challenged to maintain sustainable savings, face numerous challenges integrating supply risk management holistically into spend management. This is especially true for organizations that have focused on reducing costs and limiting working capital levels as a response to difficult market conditions.
Join this session to hear from leading experts and Ariba customers as they share how to leverage smarter supplier management and embark on a journey from being company-centric to being customer-centric and demand-driven using business networks.
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
Mitigating Global Supply Chain Risks through Smarter Supplier Management
1. Mitigating Global Supply Chain Risks
through Smarter Supplier Management
Speakers
• Christine F. Ross – Forrester Research
• Jamie Ashford – The American Red Cross
• Doug Cloutier – Cabot Materials
Moderator
• Sundar Kamakshisundaram – Ariba, an SAP Company
#AribaLIVE
@ariba
17. Emerging suppliers complicate the
risk picture
› Start-ups often lack the sophistication and/or funds to
properly secure data to client specifications
› Access to validated financial data often isn’t available
› Traditional definitions of financial viability don’t apply
› If we reject a vendor because it is risky, the business
user can overrule us and buy anyway
19. A simple plan…
›
›
›
›
Crystallize your suppliers’ overall risk with
a risk index
Clarify your own risk tolerance
Track supplier-related risks based on their
strategic importance to you
Create a treatment plan for every likely or
critical risk
36. Mitigating Global Supply Chain Risks
through Smarter Supplier Management
Doug Cloutier – Cabot Materials
#AribaLIVE
37. About Cabot
NYSE: CBT since 1968
Founded 1882
Global performance materials company
43 manufacturing sites in 21 countries
Core technical competencies in fine particles and
surface modification
FY2013 sales: $3.5 B
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
37
38. Global Overview
manufacturing sites
affiliates
regional headquarters
43 manufacturing sites in 21 countries, all with local management teams – serviced by
one purchasing team, managed centrally, with a globally distributed team.
Sales by Region
Asia
Americas
Europe, Middle
East & Africa
Spend by Region
35%
35%
34%
39%
30%
27%
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
38
39. MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
39
40. Cabot’s Purchasing Tools Evolution
Supplier
Contact
Info
Savings
Database
Contract
Archive /
Approvals
Supplier
Feedback
Competitive
Bidding (BVA)
SH&E
JDE
Global processes and
systems in place with one
global ERP instance but…
Pre-Qualifications
Trade
Extensions
Dec
2012
Manual
information
exchange with
suppliers
SUPPLIER HIDDEN
SUPPLIER HIDDEN
No data integration between
purchasing management
systems
No direct supplier interaction
from within tools
Substantial email and phone
call volumes to maintain
supplier data
SH&E contractor prequalification process
performed over email and fax
with written documents and
hard copies of certificates
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
40
41. Purchasing Tools Evolution
Supplier
Contact
Info
Savings
Database
Competitive
Bidding (BVA)
SH&E
JDE
Manual
information
exchange with
suppliers
Supplier
Feedback
Savings Tracking
Contract Approvals
& Archive
Pre-Qualifications
Dec
2012
JDE
Contract
Archive /
Approvals
Competitive Bidding
(BVA)
Key Supplier
Information
Sourcing
Trade
Extensions
eCatalogs and
eRequisitions
Supplier Feedback
Order
Acknowledgement
and Receipt Tracking
Supplier Scorecards
SH&E
Pre-Qualifications
Supplier Information
Management / Portal
Trade Extensions
(Complex
Tenders Only)
Dec
2014
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
41
42. Supplier Onboarding Strategy and SIPM Rollout
July 2012 – Project start of our initial Ariba implementation
December 2012 – SIPM Go-Live
Questionnaires and surveys full go live - English, French, Dutch, German & Italian
March 2014
North America full go-live for SIPM
South America, Europe and Asia – Top 5 suppliers each for supplier quality scorecards
March 2013 – Europe Go-Live
Training and data design to build our Ariba foundation for expansion to sourcing, contracts
and P2O
SIPM – Supplier scorecards for top mission critical suppliers
SIPM – Maintain critical insurance and safety information for all contractors working onsite at
Cabot facilities
SIPM – Key supplier information management for all managed suppliers
Asia launches in English, Chinese and Japanese
South America launches in English, Spanish and Portuguese
Today – 1,200 suppliers managed in Ariba servicing mix of SH&E and Performance Requirements
5 MARCH 2014 / PRESENTATION TITLE / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
42
43. Performance Management Process
Supplier/Contractor SH&E Pre-Qualifications
Cabot’s largest use thus far of SIPM
Critical review of insurance, safety history and contractor SH&E programs by Cabot’s
SH&E teams before a supplier is allowed to work on site. Requires renewal every 1,
2 or 3 years depending on risk associated with work performed.
Process overview:
Onboard a supplier to Ariba SIPM either by self-registration link or by manual invite.
Send a custom Ariba survey to the supplier through the supplier workspace
Use the survey interface to track responses and gather additional information
Retrieve results from completed survey and transform into Cabot internal survey for
the SH&E managers to review and send through Ariba to Cabot SH&E managers
Cabot SH&E managers approved, leave comments and rank the risk to determine
recurrence timing for next renewal of certification
Cabot purchasing sets a task reminder in workspace to indicate when renewal
is required
5 MARCH 2014 / PRESENTATION TITLE / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
43
44. Process Walk Through
SH&E Surveys within SIPM
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
44
45. Process Walk Through
SH&E Surveys within SIPM
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
45
46. Process Walk Through
SH&E Surveys within SIPM
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Contractor Name
Co
ntr
ac
tor
Contractor
Name Na
m
Contra e
ctor
Contractor
Name
Name
MARCH 2014 / SUPPLIER INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
46
47. Performance Management Process
Scorecards
Global supplier quality management organization
1 global leader
3 regional supplier quality managers
Initial rollout was 5 scorecards per regional supplier quality manager
Expanded to 5 scorecards per sub region in 2013
In 2014 suppliers selected for scorecards in Ariba by critical risk ranking
A, B or C ranking determined by type of equipment or service delivered by supplier
B level ranking can be moved up to A based on additional internal justification
All ‘A’ level suppliers will receive scorecards from within Ariba
Type of goods/service will determine if data is pulled and reviewed quarterly, bi-annually
or annually
5 MARCH 2014 / PRESENTATION TITLE / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
47
48. Lessons Learned
Scope and planning is key when designing your process
Cabot Legal was already “in” Ariba as a contracts user
Supplier information management transition does not happen on its own
The concept of “load all your suppliers into Ariba in 2013” simply did not work
SIPM was “additional work” on the purchasing teams…..
You need a burning issue to motivate and excite the purchasing organization
SH&E qualification process was challenging and manual
Ariba automated and provided a way to organize the process
Scorecard process was loosely managed if it even existed and was manual
Ariba centralized, standardized and helped to automate the process
Do not underestimate the need for power users, trainers and the time to develop
a process that works
5 MARCH 2014 / PRESENTATION TITLE / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
48
49. Future Strategy and Rollouts
We are in the process of fully rolling out our SIPM foundation in Asia and
South America
In 2014 our internal competitive bidding documentation, contract review/approval
processes and savings tracking will all go-live in Ariba globally
More reasons for supplier creation and management in Ariba
Supplier risk ranking for scorecard usage has begun and we are anticipating
significant scorecard usage in 2014 across our supply base
We are linking results of our internal supplier complaint system into our scorecard
fact tables
We are linking core JDE transaction order data into scorecard fact tables
We are preparing our P2O enablement and initial go-live in 2014
5 MARCH 2014 / PRESENTATION TITLE / CONFIDENTIAL / NOT FOR REDISTRIBUTION
49
To win in the age of the customer companies must focus on four market imperatives:- Transform the customer experienceEmbrace the mobile mind shiftBecome a digital disruptorTurn big data into business insightsASK: How do you see these market imperatives impacting you and your business?DISCUSSIONNOTE: For detailed talking points & examples, please visit https://docs.google.com/a/forrester.com/document/d/1T-kbYKZD1_41cZWJm9haYnPCemGuIhTsPKq2kj4zJH8/edit
Conflict minerals, SSAE16, PCI
Conflict minerals, SSAE16, PCI
So bringing us back to our Dante reference, there’s a reason that the inscription above the gates of hell ends with…
Ok, when I said “simple” I meant logical and easy for me to type onto a slide. It’s clearly difficult to implement. But then again, SVM has never been a place for wimps.
My colleague Lutz Peichert is building this risk index right now, and I’ve shamelessly taken his slides here to give you a sneak peek at his model so you can adapt it for your own risk assessments.
Again, taking this from Lutz’ work, vendors may have a particular risk profile, but so do you. Some of you may have the financial and people resources to take on SaaS solutions from startups, while others of you may lack the vendor management skills and people to really do the work necessary to continuously track lots of small unstable vendors.