SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 1
EFFECT OF LAND USE TYPE ON COLLEMBOLA DIVERSITY AND DENSITY IN
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 MABIRA FOREST AREA, UGANDA

                                                                                                                     processes are important drivers of local biodiversity.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  BY
                                                                                                                     Diversity was highest in Forestry and lowest in
                                                                                                                     Sugarcane. The human influences in these sites thefore
                                                                                                                                                                            BUTONO                                                                                                                                                                                                     PAUL

                 Introduction.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Collembola composition.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     A total of 1165 Collembola                                                                                                                                Relationship
                  Human activities have significantly changed
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     from     5     families  of                                                                                                                               between environmental                                                                                                                                                                      Land use simil
                  ecosystems, thereby often impairing their capacity to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Entomobryidae,                                                                                                                                            parameters and CQI.                                                                                                                                                                           arity
                  provide ecosystem services crucial for our survival.
                  Collembolans respond to changes in soil chemistry,                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Isotomidae, Sminthuridae,




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Sugarc ane
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   D1 and D2: 54.77 %




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Gras sland
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          F orest




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          F allow
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    M ix ed
                  namely soil pH, and changes in microclimatic and                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Poduridae and Anuridae                                                                                                                                                0.75
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     1


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Collembola QI
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Chemical
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1.04




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     were collected. Isotomidae
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.96




                  microhabitat conditions like moisture, amount and
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Organic

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                0.5                                                                                                                                0.88

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       BGBD




                  quality of litter and humus type. Land use types are key                                                                                                                                                                                                           were the most abundant                                                                                                                                                0.25                                                                                                                                     0.8




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               D 2 ( 2 0 .0 5 % )
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          GISQ

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.72




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Sim ilarity
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     0



                  elements for understanding biodiversity                                                                                                                                                                                                                            while the Sminthuridae                                                                                                                                             -0.25
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Physical
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   AGBD
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.64



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.56




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     were the least abundant.                                                                                                                                           -0.75
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             -0.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.48




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0.4




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Richness          Evenness                                                                                                                                                     -1

                          Objectives.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.32
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          0   0.6             1.2   1.8             2.4   3         3.6                4.2     4.8                5.4   6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -1          -0.75       -0.5             -0.25         0         0.25         0.5        0.75           1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           D1 (34.72 %)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Box plots (Richness)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Box plots (Eevenness)
                        1. Assess the plant species composition in the                                                                                                                                                                                                                                6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Land Use Type
                           different land use types.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0.8



                        2. Inventory the Collembola community composition                                                                                                                                                                                                            R ic h n e s s
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      4

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0.6




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Eeven n ess
                           in the different land use types.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           3


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0.2



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      2

                        3. Establish the relationship among above ground                                                                                                                                                                                                                              1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 0.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 P o duridae



                            biodiversity, environmental characteristics and
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Fo rest                                                                                                                                                      A nuridae
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Sminthuridae




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         .26 )
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    F2 (8 %
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Fallo w                     Ento mo bryidae
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Mixed CroppingSugarcane                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  M ixed
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0                                                                           0                                  M ixed Cropping
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Sugarcane
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Forest   Fallow Area Grassland Sy stems Plantation                           Forest   Fallow Area Grassland Systems Plantation                                               0

                            Collembola diversity and density
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Diversity. The comparison of                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Sugarcane
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Grassland




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     medians of the Collembola diversity                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Iso to midae




                 Methods.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            using the Kruskal Wallis test of the                                                                                                                                                          -0.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             -0.4                                                          -0.2                                               0                                                                              0.2                                        0.4

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            F1 (88.80 %)

                 Plant sampling.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     five LUTs showed that there was no
                 Circular plots of 10 m radius in cultivated/fallow and                                                                                                                                                                                                              significant difference.
                 plantation areas. Each plant was identified to species
                 level. The life form of each plant was recorded as Tree,
                 Shrub, Herb, Grass, Woody Climber or Herbaceous
                 Climber. Abundance was assessed using the visual                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Discussion
                 method of estimating percentage cover.                                                                                                                                                                                                                               The mixed cropping systems of Mabira region are the richest in Collembola. The
                 Collembola sampling.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Collembola community in the study area was strongly dominated by Isotomidae.
                 Soil core for estimating relative abundance.                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Dominant Isotomidae family represented high reproductive rate and adaptive
                 Winkler extractors for the extraction of Collembola.                                                                                                                                                                                                                ability. The feature has allowed some of the family to colonize forests and open
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     micro-habitats. A similar pattern is reported by Lauga-Reyrel & Deconchat
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     (1999) for oak coppice forests in France.
                        Data analysis.
                        ANOVA with F tests and kruscal Wallis tests carried
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     This may be explained by the presence of high organic matter, humid soils,
                        out. Post hoc tests of Turkey (HSD) and Benferroni.                                                                                                                                                                                                          acidity, nitrogen and presence of shade. Collembola are less pigmented and have
                        Principle component Analysis (PCA)                                                                                                                                                                                                                           soft cuticle hence are poorly adapted to withstand direct sun beams, decreasing
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     consequently in open, grass lands (Hopkin 1997). Low numbers recorded in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     grass land LUT may be due to decreased organic matter, soil compaction, lack of
RESULTS.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     shade and agricultural intensification which may have led to deterioration of soil
Floral characteristics.
418 species in 293 genera and 93 families                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            physical and chemical conditions (Lauga-Reyrel & Deconchat, 1999).
Trees were the most abundant. Herbs had the highest
number of species. The commonest plant spp in the forest
LUT was the Atiaris toxicaris, in fallow was Bidens pilosa,                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Conclusion
Grassland, mixed cropping and sugar cane was Ageratum                                                                                                                                                                                                                                The commonest plant species are Atiaris toxicaris, Bidens pilosa, and Ageratum
conyzoides                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           conyzoides. The non-woody species put together were more abundant. Landscape
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     patterns and processes like LUT have a considerable impact on family richness
Richness:                                                                             Diversity.                                                                                                     Evenness                                                                        and community composition of Collembola. Temporal patterns and processes are
        60
                                                                                                          3.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                       1                                                                             important drivers of local biodiversity. Conversion of forests to grasslands
                                                                                                                                                                                            0.9                                                                                      modified the Collembola taxonomic diversity being highest in the grassland
        50                                                                                                      3


                                                                                                                                                                                            0.8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     system. Collembola density was highest in mixed cropping systems and least in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     fallow area.
                                                                                                                                                                            S p e c ie s E v e n n e s s




        40
                                                                                      S h a n n o n In d e x




                                                                                                          2.5
S p e c ie s




                                                                                                                                                                                            0.7
        30

                                                                                                                2
                                                                                                                                                                                            0.6
        20




         10
                                                                                                               1.5
                                                                                                                                                                                            0.5                                                                                      Acknowledgement
          0                                        Mixed Cropping                                                1                                Mixed CroppingSugarcane
                                                                                                                      Forest Fallow Area Grassland Systems Plantation
                                                                                                                                                                                            0.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Forest   Fallo w Area   Grassland
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Mixed Cropping
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Systems Sugarcane Plantation
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Special thanks to DR. V. Muwanika and DR. M. Isabirye, my supervisors and to
               Forest    Fallow Area   Grassland      Systems Sugarcane Plantatio n

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     DR. Rwakaikarara silver, the Below Ground Project Coordinator in Uganda for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     her enviable support she gave throughout the study period. I sincerely thank Dr.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Arne Fjellberg for assisting in the systematic of Collembola during the training
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     work shop in Nairobi and Brian Isabirye for his technical work support.

Más contenido relacionado

Más de CSM _BGBD biodiversity

Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPOP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY: APPROA...
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING  THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY:APPROA...OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING  THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY:APPROA...
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY: APPROA...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversity
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversityOP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversity
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversityCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity Database
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity DatabaseOP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity Database
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity DatabaseCSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 

Más de CSM _BGBD biodiversity (20)

Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
 
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
 
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
 
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
 
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
 
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
 
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
 
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
 
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
 
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
 
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
 
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOPOP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
 
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
 
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
 
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY: APPROA...
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING  THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY:APPROA...OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING  THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY:APPROA...
OP20: TOWARDS A FRAMEWORK FOR VALUING THE SOIL BIOTA & ITS DIVERSITY: APPROA...
 
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversity
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversityOP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversity
OP18: Curumim and Cunhanta helping soil biodiversity
 
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity Database
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity DatabaseOP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity Database
OP19:BGBD-Mexdatabase incorporation to the National Biodiversity Database
 
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...
OP03:Diversity of termites and ants along a land use gradient in a tropical f...
 
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...
OP15:Isolation and selection of rhizobia strains, from soils of the western A...
 

Effect of land use type on collembola diversity and density in mabira forest area, uganda

  • 1. EFFECT OF LAND USE TYPE ON COLLEMBOLA DIVERSITY AND DENSITY IN MABIRA FOREST AREA, UGANDA processes are important drivers of local biodiversity. BY Diversity was highest in Forestry and lowest in Sugarcane. The human influences in these sites thefore BUTONO PAUL Introduction. Collembola composition. A total of 1165 Collembola Relationship Human activities have significantly changed from 5 families of between environmental Land use simil ecosystems, thereby often impairing their capacity to Entomobryidae, parameters and CQI. arity provide ecosystem services crucial for our survival. Collembolans respond to changes in soil chemistry, Isotomidae, Sminthuridae, Sugarc ane D1 and D2: 54.77 % Gras sland F orest F allow M ix ed namely soil pH, and changes in microclimatic and Poduridae and Anuridae 0.75 1 Collembola QI Chemical 1.04 were collected. Isotomidae 0.96 microhabitat conditions like moisture, amount and Organic 0.5 0.88 BGBD quality of litter and humus type. Land use types are key were the most abundant 0.25 0.8 D 2 ( 2 0 .0 5 % ) GISQ 0.72 Sim ilarity 0 elements for understanding biodiversity while the Sminthuridae -0.25 Physical AGBD 0.64 0.56 were the least abundant. -0.75 -0.5 0.48 0.4 Richness Evenness -1 Objectives. 0.32 0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.4 6 -1 -0.75 -0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 D1 (34.72 %) Box plots (Richness) Box plots (Eevenness) 1. Assess the plant species composition in the 6 1 Land Use Type different land use types. 5 0.8 2. Inventory the Collembola community composition R ic h n e s s 4 0.6 Eeven n ess in the different land use types. 3 0.4 0.2 2 3. Establish the relationship among above ground 1 0.2 P o duridae biodiversity, environmental characteristics and Fo rest A nuridae Sminthuridae .26 ) F2 (8 % Fallo w Ento mo bryidae Mixed CroppingSugarcane M ixed 0 0 M ixed Cropping Sugarcane Forest Fallow Area Grassland Sy stems Plantation Forest Fallow Area Grassland Systems Plantation 0 Collembola diversity and density Diversity. The comparison of Sugarcane Grassland medians of the Collembola diversity Iso to midae Methods. using the Kruskal Wallis test of the -0.2 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 F1 (88.80 %) Plant sampling. five LUTs showed that there was no Circular plots of 10 m radius in cultivated/fallow and significant difference. plantation areas. Each plant was identified to species level. The life form of each plant was recorded as Tree, Shrub, Herb, Grass, Woody Climber or Herbaceous Climber. Abundance was assessed using the visual Discussion method of estimating percentage cover. The mixed cropping systems of Mabira region are the richest in Collembola. The Collembola sampling. Collembola community in the study area was strongly dominated by Isotomidae. Soil core for estimating relative abundance. Dominant Isotomidae family represented high reproductive rate and adaptive Winkler extractors for the extraction of Collembola. ability. The feature has allowed some of the family to colonize forests and open micro-habitats. A similar pattern is reported by Lauga-Reyrel & Deconchat (1999) for oak coppice forests in France. Data analysis. ANOVA with F tests and kruscal Wallis tests carried This may be explained by the presence of high organic matter, humid soils, out. Post hoc tests of Turkey (HSD) and Benferroni. acidity, nitrogen and presence of shade. Collembola are less pigmented and have Principle component Analysis (PCA) soft cuticle hence are poorly adapted to withstand direct sun beams, decreasing consequently in open, grass lands (Hopkin 1997). Low numbers recorded in grass land LUT may be due to decreased organic matter, soil compaction, lack of RESULTS. shade and agricultural intensification which may have led to deterioration of soil Floral characteristics. 418 species in 293 genera and 93 families physical and chemical conditions (Lauga-Reyrel & Deconchat, 1999). Trees were the most abundant. Herbs had the highest number of species. The commonest plant spp in the forest LUT was the Atiaris toxicaris, in fallow was Bidens pilosa, Conclusion Grassland, mixed cropping and sugar cane was Ageratum The commonest plant species are Atiaris toxicaris, Bidens pilosa, and Ageratum conyzoides conyzoides. The non-woody species put together were more abundant. Landscape patterns and processes like LUT have a considerable impact on family richness Richness: Diversity. Evenness and community composition of Collembola. Temporal patterns and processes are 60 3.5 1 important drivers of local biodiversity. Conversion of forests to grasslands 0.9 modified the Collembola taxonomic diversity being highest in the grassland 50 3 0.8 system. Collembola density was highest in mixed cropping systems and least in fallow area. S p e c ie s E v e n n e s s 40 S h a n n o n In d e x 2.5 S p e c ie s 0.7 30 2 0.6 20 10 1.5 0.5 Acknowledgement 0 Mixed Cropping 1 Mixed CroppingSugarcane Forest Fallow Area Grassland Systems Plantation 0.4 Forest Fallo w Area Grassland Mixed Cropping Systems Sugarcane Plantation Special thanks to DR. V. Muwanika and DR. M. Isabirye, my supervisors and to Forest Fallow Area Grassland Systems Sugarcane Plantatio n DR. Rwakaikarara silver, the Below Ground Project Coordinator in Uganda for her enviable support she gave throughout the study period. I sincerely thank Dr. Arne Fjellberg for assisting in the systematic of Collembola during the training work shop in Nairobi and Brian Isabirye for his technical work support.