SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 63
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Benchmark Report Comparing Six Latin
American Public Transport Systems
Juan Carlos Muñoz, Marco Batarce, Ignacia Torres
Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
June 2013
Goals of the study
• Compare operational indicators of the transit systems (bus and
Metro) of Ciudad de México, Guadalajara, Bogotá, Lima, Porto Alegre
and Santiago.
• Urbanized metropolitan areas were considered.
• Characterize the trips made during the morning rush
• Compare the real level of service offered to users for different trip
characteristics (distance, transport modes, infrastructure, etc.)
• Assumptions
– Users take the fastest route
– Measure real level of service, not user perceptions
– Only formal and massive transport modes were analyzed
Description of the Study
• We collected 100 indicators from each city
– Socio demographic
– Public Transport Operations
– Fares and payment mechanisms
– Contracts and payments to operators
– Infrastructure for public transport
– Vehicle characteristics
– Information for users
– User perception
Description
• Performance indicators were obtained from observation
– They are hard to find in the literature
– A common methodology is needed for comparison
• Travel times
• Walking times
• Waiting times
• In-vehicle times
• Operational Speeds
• Frequencies
• Reliability
• Number of transfers
Methodology
Generate a representative sample of 400 trips based on the public transport
OD Matrix
Determine the fastest itineraries for each of the 400 trips
Obtain the distance of each trip leg of each of the 400 trips
Measure operational speeds, frequencies and reliability of a subset of
services in each city
Estimate in-vehicle, walking and waiting time for each of the 400 trips
Derive across-trips variability and within-trip variability
General Information
Cities
City
Surface
(km2)
Population
(millions)
Density
(inhab/km2)
Income
(USD)
Trips
(millions)
Public
Transport
Share
Santiago 955 5.9 6,153 450 9.5 60%
Mexico 2,884 12.1 4,204 501 21.5 69%
Guadalajara 351 3.7 10,616 453 5.7 48%
Porto Alegre 497 1.4 2,844 402 2.1 50%
Bogota 478 7.4 15,412 613 10.1 68%
Lima 2,817 9.3 3,301 307 12.1 78%
Bus Systems
City Bus firms BRT firms
Other type
of bus firms
Bus fleet
Segregated
corridors (km)
Santiago 12 6,200 90
Mexico 1,100 8 1 57,900 328
Guadalajara 8 1 2 5,200 32
Porto 4 1 1,700 104
Bogota 67 6 15,700 106
Lima 312 4 4 25,100 27
Metro Systems
Santiago
Guadalajara
(Light train)
Mexico
City
Peak-peridod Fare
($ USD)
1.3 0.5 0.2
Network Extension
(km)
103 24 201
Headway (min) 2.4 5.0 2.7
Express services YES NO NO
Main Results
Main Results
• Santiago and Bogota offer comparatively high average
speeds
– Door to door
– In-vehicle
– For a given distance category
• Longer trips take longer but enjoy faster average speeds
Travel Distance and Speed
0
5
10
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto
Alegre
Bogota Lima
Speed
Distance
Travel distance (km) Average travel speed (km/h)
In-Vehicle Distance and Speed
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
15
20
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Speed
Distance
In-vehicle distance (km) In-vehicle speed (km/h)
Distance and Speed for Trips between 5 and 10 km
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
6.4
6.8
7.2
7.6
8.0
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto
Alegre
Bogota Lima
Speed
Distance
Travel distance (km) Average travel speed (km/h)
In-Vehicle Speed by Mode
City
Bus
(km/h)
Metro
(km/h)
BRT
(km/h)
All
(km/h)
Santiago 17.1 33.4 23.9
Mexico 8.8 21.1 13.9 17.4
Guadalajara 15.4 26.0 16.1
Porto Alegre 17.0 17.0
Bogota 16.3 27.2 19.0
Lima 16.0 16.0
Main Results
• In Santiago travel time variability among different trips of
similar length is the lowest, the highest is in Mexico City.
This is indicative of equity.
– Due to an integrated system in Santiago in which each user can
access the system through the fastest possible route for the same
fare
• In most systems the variability of waiting times for bus
services was quite high. In Metro was almost zero. This is
indicative of reliability. The lowest were in Lima, Porto
Alegre and Santiago.
Travel Time
0
20
40
60
80
100
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Travel time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
Travel Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km
0
20
40
60
80
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Travel time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
In-Vehicle Time
0
20
40
60
80
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
In-vehicle time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
In-Vehicle Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km
0
15
30
45
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
In-vehicle time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
Main results
• In Santiago, Guadalajara and Porto Alegre waiting time is
higher than that in other cities.
• In Bogotá, Lima and Ciudad de México waiting time is
smaller since a large fraction of services (90%) are
unregulated.
• These systems operate larger fleets and high frequencies
(55,000 in Ciudad de México, 25,000 in Lima and 13,000 in
Bogotá; in Santiago only 6.000)
Travel Time Composition
0
25
50
75
100
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Time(min)
In-vehicle Waiting Walking
Waiting Time
0
5
10
15
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Waiting time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
Travel Time Composition for
Trips between 5 and 10 km
0
15
30
45
60
75
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Time(min)
In-vehicle Waiting Walking
Waiting Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km
0
4
8
12
16
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Waiting time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
• Waiting time increases because users cannot bord
the first arriving bus
– In the case of trunk services, average waiting time
increases 55%
– In the case of feeder services, 29%
Waiting Time in Santiago
Percentage of users that can take the…
1st bus 2nd bus 3th bus 4th bus 5th bus
Feeder 77.0% 16.6% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Trunk 67.4% 16.1% 12.0% 3.2% 1.2%
Bus Systems
Santiago Bogota Guadalajara Mexico City
Porto
Alegre
Lima
Bus firms 12 67 8 1,100 4 312
BRT firms 6 1 8 4
Other type of
bus firms
2 1 1 4
Bus fleet 6,200 15,700 5,200 57,900 1,700 25,100
Bus segregated
corridors(km)
90 106 32 328 104 27
Main results
• The walking times in Santiago and Mexico City are also
quite high.
• In Santiago the average distance to access the first vehicle
is 383 m, versus 340 m in Lima and 209 m in Bogotá.
• This is partly explained by buses in Santiago stopping only
at designated stops.
• Bogotá has low walking times
Walking Time
0
5
10
15
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Walking time (min) City variability (min)
Walking Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km
0
4
8
12
16
Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima
Walking time (min) City variability (min)
Santiago vs Bogotá
• Santiago and Bogotá have similar populations and average
trip length
• Operational speed for each trip length category is also similar
• Average door to door speed in Bogotá is 13.4 km/h while
Santiago´s is 14.5 km/h
• However… both cities have followed a very different paths
– Santiago: 100 kms of Metro, declining transit modal share
– Bogotá: 100 kms of BRT, stable? transit modal share
• High capacity buses, segregated corridors, extra-vehicular payment
Travel Time in Santiago and Bogota
0
20
40
60
80
100
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25
Traveltime(min)
Travel distance (km)
Bogota Santiago
Main Results
• In Santiago, speed in segregated corridors is significatively
higher than that in mixed-traffic roads
• For instance, speed is 25 km/h in segregated corridors, and
15 km/h in mixed traffic roads
Operation Speed according to Infrastructure
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
Mixed Traffic Only-Bus
lane
Segregated
corridor
BRT
(Bogota)
Metro Express in
Highway
Speed(km/h)
Main Results
• An additional conclusion, which is obtained from the
comparison process, is that the information availability is
very heterogeneous
Additional Observations
Number of Trip Legs
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Santiago México GuadalajaraPorto Alegre Bogotá Lima
Bus Metro BRT
Average Fare
City Average fare (USD)
Average fare per distance
(USD/km)
Santiago 1.37 0.12
Mexico 0.68 – 1.34 0.04 – 0.07
Guadalajara 0.68 0.08
Porto Alegre 1.64 0.19
Bogota 1.66 0.14
Lima 0.24 – 1.62 0.05 -0.08
Benchmark Report Comparing Six Latin
American Public Transport Systems
Juan Carlos Muñoz, Marco Batarce, Ignacia Torres
Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
June 2013
Detailed Analysis of Santiago
(in Spanish)
Distribución de Viajes por Distancia
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 Más
Frecuencia
Longitud de viaje (km)
Etapas de Viaje
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Etapas
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus Metro
Etapas Totales = 2.29
Etapas Bus = 1.33
Etapas Metro = 0.96
Distancia de Viaje en Vehículo
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
DistanciaenVehículo
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus Metro
Distancia Total= 11.4 km
Distancia Bus = 4.8 km
Distancia Metro = 6.5 km
Composición del Tiempo de Viaje
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Trips Caminata Espera En vehículo
Caminata= 13.8 min
Espera = 8.6 min
En vehículo = 28.5 min
Tiempo de Viaje Total y Variabilidad Individual
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeviaje(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje
Media = 50.7 min
Des. Est. = 5.0 min
Tiempo de Viaje en Vehículo y Variabilidad Individual
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempoenvehículo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo
Media = 28.4 min
Des. Est. = 3.5 min
Tiempo de Espera y Variabilidad Individual
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeespera(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera
Media = 8.6 min
Des. Est. = 5.8 min
Tiempo de Viaje Total
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeviaje(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tiempo de Viaje
Media = 50.8 min
Des. Est. = 22.5 min
Tiempo en Vehículo
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempoenvehículo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo
Media = 28.5 min
Des. Est. = 15.7 min
Tiempo de Espera
0
5
10
15
20
25
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeespera(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera
Media = 8.6 min
Des. Est. = 4.7 min
Tiempo de Caminata
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodecaminata(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. Caminando
Media = 12.6 min
Des. Est. = 6.2 min
Detailed Analysis of Bogota
(in Spanish)
Distribución de Viajes por Distancia en Bogotá
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 Más
Frecuencia
Longitud de viaje (km)
Etapas de Viaje en Bogotá
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Etapas
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus BRT
Etapas Totales = 1.85
Etapas Bus = 1.41
Etapas BRT = 0.43
Distancia de Viaje en Vehículo en Bogotá
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Distanciaenvehículo(km)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus BRT
Distancia Total= 11.5 km
Distancia Bus = 7.3 km
Distancia BRT = 4.1 km
Composición del Tiempo de Viaje en Bogotá
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Caminata Espera Vehículo
Caminata= 8.6 min
Espera = 4.8 min
En vehículo =36.2 min
Tiempo de Viaje Total y Variabilidad Individual en
Bogotá
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeviaje(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje
Media = 49.6 min
Des. Est. = 10.4 min
Tiempo de Viaje en Vehículo y Variabilidad
Individual en Bogotá
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempoenvehículo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo
Media = 36.2 min
Des. Est. = 9.1 min
Tiempo de Espera y Variabilidad Individual en
Bogotá
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeespera(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera
Media = 4.8 min
Des. Est. = 5.0 min
Tiempo de Viaje Total en Bogotá
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeviaje(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje
Media = 49.6 min
Des. Est. = 24.2 min
Tiempo en Vehículo en Bogotá
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempoenvehículo(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo
Media = 36.2 min
Des. Est. = 23.3 min
Tiempo de Espera en Bogotá
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodeespera(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera
Media =4.8 min
Des. Est. = 2.3 min
Tiempo de Caminata en Bogotá
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más
Tiempodecaminata(min)
Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. Caminando
Media =8,56min
Des. Est. =2,16min

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a 2013 06-28 Benchmark report comparing six latin american public transport systems

Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-Hailing
Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-HailingLightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-Hailing
Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-HailingWorld Bank Infrastructure
 
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)alirazmpa
 
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systems
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systemsTheme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systems
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systemsBRTCoE
 
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018David Hablewitz
 
Public transport improvement
Public transport improvement Public transport improvement
Public transport improvement ICLEI
 
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in Montréal
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in MontréalTrepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in Montréal
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in MontréalINVERS Mobility Solutions
 
BRT Chennai
BRT ChennaiBRT Chennai
BRT Chennaiedsley
 
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, BrazilCitywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, BrazilWRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities
 
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINAL
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINALGIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINAL
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINALArjan van Andel
 
Transportation planning
Transportation planningTransportation planning
Transportation planningNikolaopi2
 
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost Reductions
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost ReductionsLessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost Reductions
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost ReductionsNew York Public Transit Association
 
Atlanta Transportation Plan
Atlanta Transportation PlanAtlanta Transportation Plan
Atlanta Transportation PlanTom Wyatt, IOM
 
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities
 
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdfUGPTI
 

Similar a 2013 06-28 Benchmark report comparing six latin american public transport systems (20)

Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-Hailing
Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-HailingLightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-Hailing
Lightning Talk - Transport: Transit Reforms and Ride-Hailing
 
BRT Workshop - Intro
BRT Workshop - IntroBRT Workshop - Intro
BRT Workshop - Intro
 
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
 
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systems
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systemsTheme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systems
Theme 3b Users perspective of integrated transit systems
 
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018
Eastside transportation issues briefing 07182018
 
Public transport improvement
Public transport improvement Public transport improvement
Public transport improvement
 
Modern Roads
Modern RoadsModern Roads
Modern Roads
 
Tackling future urban mobility demand in singapore
Tackling future urban mobility demand in singaporeTackling future urban mobility demand in singapore
Tackling future urban mobility demand in singapore
 
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in Montréal
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in MontréalTrepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in Montréal
Trepanier and Viviani - One-way carsharing in Montréal
 
BRT Chennai
BRT ChennaiBRT Chennai
BRT Chennai
 
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, BrazilCitywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Citywide Transit Integration in a Large City: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil
 
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINAL
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINALGIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINAL
GIRO-PPT-APTAANNUAL-20151001_FINAL
 
Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all ModesTransportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
 
Transportation planning
Transportation planningTransportation planning
Transportation planning
 
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost Reductions
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost ReductionsLessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost Reductions
Lessons Learned in Transit Efficiencies, Revenue Generation, and Cost Reductions
 
ACT 2014 How We Move Around New Research on Transportation Impacts of Urban M...
ACT 2014 How We Move Around New Research on Transportation Impacts of Urban M...ACT 2014 How We Move Around New Research on Transportation Impacts of Urban M...
ACT 2014 How We Move Around New Research on Transportation Impacts of Urban M...
 
Atlanta Transportation Plan
Atlanta Transportation PlanAtlanta Transportation Plan
Atlanta Transportation Plan
 
BRT Workshop - BRT and BHLS Evolution Worldwide
BRT Workshop - BRT and BHLS Evolution WorldwideBRT Workshop - BRT and BHLS Evolution Worldwide
BRT Workshop - BRT and BHLS Evolution Worldwide
 
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...
Experiences and Challenges in the Transport Integrated Net of Curitiba and th...
 
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf
2022-10_advisory-council-program-update.pdf
 

Más de BRTCoE

BRT+ Workshop
BRT+ WorkshopBRT+ Workshop
BRT+ WorkshopBRTCoE
 
MaaS Trial in Sydney
MaaS Trial in SydneyMaaS Trial in Sydney
MaaS Trial in SydneyBRTCoE
 
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos Muñoz
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos MuñozFull cost reliability by Juan Carlos Muñoz
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos MuñozBRTCoE
 
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITL
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITLCongreso nacional chileno 2019 DITL
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITLBRTCoE
 
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...BRTCoE
 
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...BRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteBRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo Mobereola
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo MobereolaWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo Mobereola
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo MobereolaBRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...BRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Mobilize
Workshop Innovation in Africa - MobilizeWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Mobilize
Workshop Innovation in Africa - MobilizeBRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina Albuquerque
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina AlbuquerqueWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina Albuquerque
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina AlbuquerqueBRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...BRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...BRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo VenterWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo VenterBRTCoE
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence Presentation
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence PresentationWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence Presentation
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence PresentationBRTCoE
 
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...BRTCoE
 
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...BRTCoE
 
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...BRTCoE
 
BRT Station Design in the Urban Context
BRT Station Design in the Urban ContextBRT Station Design in the Urban Context
BRT Station Design in the Urban ContextBRTCoE
 
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 p
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 pZhao emotional travel 20160920 p
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 pBRTCoE
 

Más de BRTCoE (20)

BRT+ Workshop
BRT+ WorkshopBRT+ Workshop
BRT+ Workshop
 
MaaS Trial in Sydney
MaaS Trial in SydneyMaaS Trial in Sydney
MaaS Trial in Sydney
 
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos Muñoz
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos MuñozFull cost reliability by Juan Carlos Muñoz
Full cost reliability by Juan Carlos Muñoz
 
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITL
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITLCongreso nacional chileno 2019 DITL
Congreso nacional chileno 2019 DITL
 
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...
Gabriel Oliveira - BRT in Brazil: state of the practice as from the BRT Stand...
 
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...
Heather Allen - Why do we need to consider how women move in urban transport ...
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT LiteWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Manifesto for BRT Lite
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo Mobereola
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo MobereolaWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo Mobereola
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Nigeria by Dr. Dayo Mobereola
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Context, challenges & opportunities for urban...
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Mobilize
Workshop Innovation in Africa - MobilizeWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Mobilize
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Mobilize
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina Albuquerque
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina AlbuquerqueWorkshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina Albuquerque
Workshop Innovation in Africa - Day one of operations by Cristina Albuquerque
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT Lessons from Dar es Salaam by Ronald Lwak...
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT, Minibus System and Innovation in African...
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo VenterWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter
 
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence Presentation
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence PresentationWorkshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence Presentation
Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT+ Centre of Excellence Presentation
 
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...
Camila Balbontin - Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen,...
 
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...
Cristian Navas - Testing collaborative accessibility-based engagement tools: ...
 
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...
Juan Carlos Muñoz - Connected and automated buses. An opportunity to bring re...
 
BRT Station Design in the Urban Context
BRT Station Design in the Urban ContextBRT Station Design in the Urban Context
BRT Station Design in the Urban Context
 
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 p
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 pZhao emotional travel 20160920 p
Zhao emotional travel 20160920 p
 

Último

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Patryk Bandurski
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxNavinnSomaal
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Wonjun Hwang
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Manik S Magar
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsMiki Katsuragi
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr LapshynFwdays
 
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfThe Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfSeasiaInfotech2
 

Último (20)

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering TipsVertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
Vertex AI Gemini Prompt Engineering Tips
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
 
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdfThe Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
The Future of Software Development - Devin AI Innovative Approach.pdf
 

2013 06-28 Benchmark report comparing six latin american public transport systems

  • 1. Benchmark Report Comparing Six Latin American Public Transport Systems Juan Carlos Muñoz, Marco Batarce, Ignacia Torres Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile June 2013
  • 2. Goals of the study • Compare operational indicators of the transit systems (bus and Metro) of Ciudad de México, Guadalajara, Bogotá, Lima, Porto Alegre and Santiago. • Urbanized metropolitan areas were considered. • Characterize the trips made during the morning rush • Compare the real level of service offered to users for different trip characteristics (distance, transport modes, infrastructure, etc.) • Assumptions – Users take the fastest route – Measure real level of service, not user perceptions – Only formal and massive transport modes were analyzed
  • 3. Description of the Study • We collected 100 indicators from each city – Socio demographic – Public Transport Operations – Fares and payment mechanisms – Contracts and payments to operators – Infrastructure for public transport – Vehicle characteristics – Information for users – User perception
  • 4. Description • Performance indicators were obtained from observation – They are hard to find in the literature – A common methodology is needed for comparison • Travel times • Walking times • Waiting times • In-vehicle times • Operational Speeds • Frequencies • Reliability • Number of transfers
  • 5. Methodology Generate a representative sample of 400 trips based on the public transport OD Matrix Determine the fastest itineraries for each of the 400 trips Obtain the distance of each trip leg of each of the 400 trips Measure operational speeds, frequencies and reliability of a subset of services in each city Estimate in-vehicle, walking and waiting time for each of the 400 trips Derive across-trips variability and within-trip variability
  • 7. Cities City Surface (km2) Population (millions) Density (inhab/km2) Income (USD) Trips (millions) Public Transport Share Santiago 955 5.9 6,153 450 9.5 60% Mexico 2,884 12.1 4,204 501 21.5 69% Guadalajara 351 3.7 10,616 453 5.7 48% Porto Alegre 497 1.4 2,844 402 2.1 50% Bogota 478 7.4 15,412 613 10.1 68% Lima 2,817 9.3 3,301 307 12.1 78%
  • 8. Bus Systems City Bus firms BRT firms Other type of bus firms Bus fleet Segregated corridors (km) Santiago 12 6,200 90 Mexico 1,100 8 1 57,900 328 Guadalajara 8 1 2 5,200 32 Porto 4 1 1,700 104 Bogota 67 6 15,700 106 Lima 312 4 4 25,100 27
  • 9. Metro Systems Santiago Guadalajara (Light train) Mexico City Peak-peridod Fare ($ USD) 1.3 0.5 0.2 Network Extension (km) 103 24 201 Headway (min) 2.4 5.0 2.7 Express services YES NO NO
  • 11. Main Results • Santiago and Bogota offer comparatively high average speeds – Door to door – In-vehicle – For a given distance category • Longer trips take longer but enjoy faster average speeds
  • 12. Travel Distance and Speed 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Speed Distance Travel distance (km) Average travel speed (km/h)
  • 13. In-Vehicle Distance and Speed 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Speed Distance In-vehicle distance (km) In-vehicle speed (km/h)
  • 14. Distance and Speed for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.6 8.0 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Speed Distance Travel distance (km) Average travel speed (km/h)
  • 15. In-Vehicle Speed by Mode City Bus (km/h) Metro (km/h) BRT (km/h) All (km/h) Santiago 17.1 33.4 23.9 Mexico 8.8 21.1 13.9 17.4 Guadalajara 15.4 26.0 16.1 Porto Alegre 17.0 17.0 Bogota 16.3 27.2 19.0 Lima 16.0 16.0
  • 16. Main Results • In Santiago travel time variability among different trips of similar length is the lowest, the highest is in Mexico City. This is indicative of equity. – Due to an integrated system in Santiago in which each user can access the system through the fastest possible route for the same fare • In most systems the variability of waiting times for bus services was quite high. In Metro was almost zero. This is indicative of reliability. The lowest were in Lima, Porto Alegre and Santiago.
  • 17. Travel Time 0 20 40 60 80 100 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Travel time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 18. Travel Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0 20 40 60 80 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Travel time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 19. In-Vehicle Time 0 20 40 60 80 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima In-vehicle time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 20. In-Vehicle Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0 15 30 45 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima In-vehicle time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 21. Main results • In Santiago, Guadalajara and Porto Alegre waiting time is higher than that in other cities. • In Bogotá, Lima and Ciudad de México waiting time is smaller since a large fraction of services (90%) are unregulated. • These systems operate larger fleets and high frequencies (55,000 in Ciudad de México, 25,000 in Lima and 13,000 in Bogotá; in Santiago only 6.000)
  • 22. Travel Time Composition 0 25 50 75 100 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Time(min) In-vehicle Waiting Walking
  • 23. Waiting Time 0 5 10 15 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Waiting time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 24. Travel Time Composition for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0 15 30 45 60 75 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Time(min) In-vehicle Waiting Walking
  • 25. Waiting Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0 4 8 12 16 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Waiting time (min) City variability (min) Individual variability (min)
  • 26. • Waiting time increases because users cannot bord the first arriving bus – In the case of trunk services, average waiting time increases 55% – In the case of feeder services, 29% Waiting Time in Santiago Percentage of users that can take the… 1st bus 2nd bus 3th bus 4th bus 5th bus Feeder 77.0% 16.6% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0% Trunk 67.4% 16.1% 12.0% 3.2% 1.2%
  • 27. Bus Systems Santiago Bogota Guadalajara Mexico City Porto Alegre Lima Bus firms 12 67 8 1,100 4 312 BRT firms 6 1 8 4 Other type of bus firms 2 1 1 4 Bus fleet 6,200 15,700 5,200 57,900 1,700 25,100 Bus segregated corridors(km) 90 106 32 328 104 27
  • 28. Main results • The walking times in Santiago and Mexico City are also quite high. • In Santiago the average distance to access the first vehicle is 383 m, versus 340 m in Lima and 209 m in Bogotá. • This is partly explained by buses in Santiago stopping only at designated stops. • Bogotá has low walking times
  • 29. Walking Time 0 5 10 15 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Walking time (min) City variability (min)
  • 30. Walking Time for Trips between 5 and 10 km 0 4 8 12 16 Santiago Mexico Guadalajara Porto Alegre Bogota Lima Walking time (min) City variability (min)
  • 31. Santiago vs Bogotá • Santiago and Bogotá have similar populations and average trip length • Operational speed for each trip length category is also similar • Average door to door speed in Bogotá is 13.4 km/h while Santiago´s is 14.5 km/h • However… both cities have followed a very different paths – Santiago: 100 kms of Metro, declining transit modal share – Bogotá: 100 kms of BRT, stable? transit modal share • High capacity buses, segregated corridors, extra-vehicular payment
  • 32. Travel Time in Santiago and Bogota 0 20 40 60 80 100 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 Traveltime(min) Travel distance (km) Bogota Santiago
  • 33. Main Results • In Santiago, speed in segregated corridors is significatively higher than that in mixed-traffic roads • For instance, speed is 25 km/h in segregated corridors, and 15 km/h in mixed traffic roads
  • 34. Operation Speed according to Infrastructure 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 Mixed Traffic Only-Bus lane Segregated corridor BRT (Bogota) Metro Express in Highway Speed(km/h)
  • 35. Main Results • An additional conclusion, which is obtained from the comparison process, is that the information availability is very heterogeneous
  • 37. Number of Trip Legs 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Santiago México GuadalajaraPorto Alegre Bogotá Lima Bus Metro BRT
  • 38. Average Fare City Average fare (USD) Average fare per distance (USD/km) Santiago 1.37 0.12 Mexico 0.68 – 1.34 0.04 – 0.07 Guadalajara 0.68 0.08 Porto Alegre 1.64 0.19 Bogota 1.66 0.14 Lima 0.24 – 1.62 0.05 -0.08
  • 39. Benchmark Report Comparing Six Latin American Public Transport Systems Juan Carlos Muñoz, Marco Batarce, Ignacia Torres Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile June 2013
  • 40. Detailed Analysis of Santiago (in Spanish)
  • 41. Distribución de Viajes por Distancia 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 Más Frecuencia Longitud de viaje (km)
  • 42. Etapas de Viaje 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Etapas Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus Metro Etapas Totales = 2.29 Etapas Bus = 1.33 Etapas Metro = 0.96
  • 43. Distancia de Viaje en Vehículo 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más DistanciaenVehículo Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus Metro Distancia Total= 11.4 km Distancia Bus = 4.8 km Distancia Metro = 6.5 km
  • 44. Composición del Tiempo de Viaje 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Trips Caminata Espera En vehículo Caminata= 13.8 min Espera = 8.6 min En vehículo = 28.5 min
  • 45. Tiempo de Viaje Total y Variabilidad Individual 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeviaje(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje Media = 50.7 min Des. Est. = 5.0 min
  • 46. Tiempo de Viaje en Vehículo y Variabilidad Individual 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempoenvehículo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo Media = 28.4 min Des. Est. = 3.5 min
  • 47. Tiempo de Espera y Variabilidad Individual 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeespera(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera Media = 8.6 min Des. Est. = 5.8 min
  • 48. Tiempo de Viaje Total 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeviaje(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tiempo de Viaje Media = 50.8 min Des. Est. = 22.5 min
  • 49. Tiempo en Vehículo 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempoenvehículo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo Media = 28.5 min Des. Est. = 15.7 min
  • 50. Tiempo de Espera 0 5 10 15 20 25 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeespera(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera Media = 8.6 min Des. Est. = 4.7 min
  • 51. Tiempo de Caminata 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodecaminata(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. Caminando Media = 12.6 min Des. Est. = 6.2 min
  • 52. Detailed Analysis of Bogota (in Spanish)
  • 53. Distribución de Viajes por Distancia en Bogotá 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 Más Frecuencia Longitud de viaje (km)
  • 54. Etapas de Viaje en Bogotá 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Etapas Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus BRT Etapas Totales = 1.85 Etapas Bus = 1.41 Etapas BRT = 0.43
  • 55. Distancia de Viaje en Vehículo en Bogotá 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Distanciaenvehículo(km) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Bus BRT Distancia Total= 11.5 km Distancia Bus = 7.3 km Distancia BRT = 4.1 km
  • 56. Composición del Tiempo de Viaje en Bogotá 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Caminata Espera Vehículo Caminata= 8.6 min Espera = 4.8 min En vehículo =36.2 min
  • 57. Tiempo de Viaje Total y Variabilidad Individual en Bogotá 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeviaje(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje Media = 49.6 min Des. Est. = 10.4 min
  • 58. Tiempo de Viaje en Vehículo y Variabilidad Individual en Bogotá 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempoenvehículo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo Media = 36.2 min Des. Est. = 9.1 min
  • 59. Tiempo de Espera y Variabilidad Individual en Bogotá 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeespera(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera Media = 4.8 min Des. Est. = 5.0 min
  • 60. Tiempo de Viaje Total en Bogotá 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeviaje(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Viaje Media = 49.6 min Des. Est. = 24.2 min
  • 61. Tiempo en Vehículo en Bogotá 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempoenvehículo(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. en Vehículo Media = 36.2 min Des. Est. = 23.3 min
  • 62. Tiempo de Espera en Bogotá 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodeespera(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. de Espera Media =4.8 min Des. Est. = 2.3 min
  • 63. Tiempo de Caminata en Bogotá 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 Más Tiempodecaminata(min) Longitud de viaje (km) Viajes Tpo. Caminando Media =8,56min Des. Est. =2,16min