3. Outcomes
• To inspire you to be as passionate as I am about
the quality of course room discourse
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 3
4. Outcomes
• To distinguish between the concepts of interaction
and intersubjectivity
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 4
5. Outcomes
• To envisage intersubjectivity as the next tier in the
increasing quality of course-based, online learning
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 5
6. Outcomes
• To inspire you to be as passionate as I am about
the quality of course room discourse
• To distinguish between the concepts of interaction
and intersubjectivity
• To envisage intersubjectivity as the next tier in the
increasing quality of course-based, online learning
• Is there something else you would like to be sure
we cover in our discussion today?
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 6
7. Me in Three
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 7
8. Me in Three
Logos are registered trademarks of the universities and are used without permission.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 8
9. Me in Three
Logos are registered trademarks of the universities and are used without permission.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 9
13. A Context
Irrelevant Substantive
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group Inc. 13
14. A Context
Interaction
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 14
15. A Context
Interaction
Intersubjectivity
Photo by Francesco Marino
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 15
16. Your Thoughts?
Contribute to the conversation
by posting your
comments, questions, or musings
into the chat board.
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 16
17. A Context
Interaction
Intersubjectivity
Photo by Francesco Marino
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 17
18. Interaction
Graphic by jscreationzs
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 18
19. Interaction
Graphic by jscreationzs
“the process through which
the negotiation of meaning
and co-creation of knowledge occurs”
(Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson , 1997, p.407)
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 19
20. Interaction
Graphic by jscreationzs
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 20
21. Your Thoughts?
When might interaction be sufficient,
or when might the course outcomes
be less conducive to collaborative
knowledge construction?
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 21
22. Bloom’s Taxonomy
Evaluate
Synthesis
Analysis
Application
Comprehension
Knowledge
Bloom, B. S., and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain.
New York, NY: Longmans.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 22
23. Extreme Makeover:
Bloom’s Edition
Evaluate Creating
Synthesis Evaluating
Analysis Analyzing
Application Applying
Comprehension Understanding
Knowledge Remembering
Bloom, B. S., and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives The classification Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and
of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York,
domain. New York, NY: Longmans. NY: Longman.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 23
24. Lower-Order Skills
-
-
-
Applying
Understanding
Remembering
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 24
25. Higher-Order
Skills
Creating
Evaluating
Analyzing
-
-
-
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 25
26. Course Room
Distinct
presentations
Discussions Are...
(Henri, 1995)
Serial
monologues
(Pawan et al., 2003)
Consecutive
online notes
(Hewitt, 2005)
Superficial
postings
(Ke, 2010)
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 26
27. Course Room
Distinct
presentations
Discussions Are...
(Henri, 1995)
65% of students
“insufficient value”
Serial (Chang, 2003)
monologues
(Pawan et al., 2003)
Consecutive
online notes
(Hewitt, 2005)
Superficial
postings
(Ke, 2010)
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 27
28. Intersubjectivity
Graphic by Francesco Marino
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 28
29. Intersubjectivity
“the product of knowledge construction
resulting from the negotiation of
multiple perspectives within course
room discourse”
Photo by Francesco Marino
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 29
30. Graphic by jscreationzs A Contrast
Photo by Francesco Marino
Interaction = Process
Intersubjectivity =
Product
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 30
31. A Metaphor
Photo from free-pictures-photos.com
Graphic by Bitten Nails Design & Illustration
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 31
32. A Metaphor
Photo from free-pictures-photos.com
Photo by nuttakit
Graphic by Bitten Nails Design & Illustration
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 32
33. An Example
Lucas: I think some people make the service delivery process too
complicated. I don’t know if it’s the administrators or the practitioners
themselves, but action is often slow and opportunities are missed.
Takiyah: The decision-making process for a human services practitioner
is very difficult. There are so many different players and contexts. It’s
hard to know what to do and in what order to do it. I am not sure there
is enough guidance on who to help first.
Lucas: The human services practitioner must put the child’s needs
above everyone else’s needs. The adults in the situation can take care of
themselves, or are at least more responsible for their actions than a
child can be.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 33
34. An Example
Takiyah: While the child’s needs are certainly very important, I am not
sure that their needs are always the most important or the first priority.
Consider Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. If we look at the
situation from this theory, then everybody’s needs affect everybody
else. If the parents’ needs aren’t met, then that affects their ability to
provide the child’s needs.
Lucas: That’s a good point, Takiyah. I can see how there are needs of the
individuals and of the family as a whole. If we look at the case study
through this theory, then delivery process should look not at just one
individual at first, but the whole family. We should look at the whole
community, really, since there are many systems which affect this
particular family.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 34
35. Your Thoughts?
Contribute to the conversation
by posting your
comments, questions, or musings
into the chat board.
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 35
36. A Review
Graphic by jscreationzs
“the process through which
the negotiation of meaning
and co-creation of knowledge occurs”
(Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson , 1997, p.407)
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 36
37. Graphic by jscreationzs
A Review
Photo by Francesco Marino
“the process through which
the negotiation of meaning
and co-creation of knowledge
occurs”
(Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson , 1997, p.407)
“the product of knowledge construction
resulting from the negotiation of
multiple perspectives within
course room discourse”
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 37
38. Lower-Order Skills
-
-
-
Applying
Understanding
Remembering
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 38
39. Higher-Order
Skills
Creating
Evaluating
Analyzing
-
-
-
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition. New York, NY: Longman.
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 39
40. Outcomes
• To inspire you to be as passionate as I am about
the quality of course room discourse
• To distinguish between the concepts of interaction
and intersubjectivity
• To envisage intersubjectivity as the next tier in the
increasing quality of course-based, online learning
• Your contributions within this scope
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 40
42. Take Aways?
• Which part, if any, of our discussion has
offered a new or unique perspective for
you?
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 42
43. Take Aways?
• Which part, if any, of our discussion has
offered a new or unique perspective for
you?
• With what, if anything, might you
disagree or be confused?
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 43
44. Take Aways?
• Which part, if any, of our discussion has
offered a new or unique perspective for
you?
• With what, if anything, might you
disagree or be confused?
• What action might you take based on
the information we have discussed?
Graphic by Petr Kratochvil
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 44
45. Let’s Connect!
Website: www.barbhall.org
Twitter: BarbMHall
LinkedIn: Barbara Hall
barb.m.hall@gmail.com
bhall@instructionalconsultinggroup.com
17 October 2010 Instructional Consulting Group, Inc. 45
