SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 8
Descargar para leer sin conexión
CRICK,
WATSON,
AND
FRANKLIN
5
BIOGRAPHY
By Lorem Ipsum
Born
February 12, 1809
Shrewsbury, England
Died
April 19, 1882
Downe, England
CRICK,
WATSON,
AND
FRANKLIN
THE RACE TO DISCOVER THE
STRUCTURE OF DNA
Rosalind Franklin
Born
July 25, 1920
London
Died
April 16, 1958
London
Francis Crick
Born
June 8, 1916
Northampton, England
Died
July 28, 2004
San Diego, California
James Watson
Born
April 6, 1928
Chicago, Illinois By Cynthia Stokes Brown
2 	3
In 1953, three English
biochemists helped unlock
the mystery of life by
determining the double
helix structure of the DNA
molecule. Found in all
life on Earth, DNA contains
the information by which
an organism regenerates
its cells and passes traits to
its offspring.
4 	5
Setting the stage
Despite his success in formulating the theory of natural selection, Charles
Darwin did not yet understand how characteristics are passed from parent
organisms to their offspring with the slight changes that make evolution
possible and identify each individual.
By the middle of the 20th century this was still not well understood. The
first part of the century had seen major breakthroughs in physics, such
as Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and atomic bombs that used the energy
of nuclear fusion. After World War II scientists turned to understanding
the physical basis (atomic and molecular) of biological phenomena.
In the 1950s biochemists realized that DNA, short for deoxyribonucleic
acid, delivered the instructions for copying a new organism. A yard of DNA
is folded and packed into the nucleus of every cell in pairs called “chromo-
somes,” with one exception: in the reproductive cells, where the pieces of
DNA are not paired.
DNA has three constituents: 1) a type of sugar called “ribose”; 2) a phos-
phate (phosphorous surrounded by oxygen) responsible for its acidity; and
3) four kinds of bases — adenine (A), thymine (T), guanine (G), and cytosine
(C). Since these four bases seemed too simple to be able to pass on all the
information needed to create a new organism, biochemists were baffled
about DNA’s structure and how it worked. However, these four bases com-
bine like letters of an alphabet to describe complex variations in genetic
traits.
The question became how to study the DNA molecule. Biochemists believed
that understanding its structure would reveal how the molecule coded the
instructions for copying a new organism. They began taking X-ray images of
crystals of DNA, believing that its crystallization meant it must have a regu-
lar structure. The pattern of the X-rays bouncing off atoms (a phenomenon
called “diffraction”) gave information about their location in the molecule.
One of the pioneers of this technique, called “X-ray crystallography,” was
Linus Pauling, who worked at the California Institute of Technology in Pasa-
6 	7
Rosalind Franklin working at King’s College in London
dena. In the early 1950s Pauling, a prominent chemist doing molecular re-
search in the States, seemed a likely candidate to unlock the mystery of life,
since he had already concluded that the general shape of DNA must be a
helix, or spiral.
The race
The victory, however, went to three people working in England, in one of
the great scientific races of all time. One, Rosalind Franklin was working
at King’s College at the University of London. The other two, James Watson
and Francis Crick were friends and lab mates some 50 miles away at the
Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University, where they worked coopera-
tively and shared their ideas.
Franklin was from a wealthy, influential family in London. She had earned
her PhD in 1945 from Cambridge in physical chemistry. Starting at King’s
College in 1951 at the age of 31, she was focused on studying DNA. She
became extremely skilled in X-ray crystallography, able to produce clear
and accurate diffraction images of DNA crystals by using fine-focus X-ray
equipment and pure DNA samples.
Over in Cambridge, biochemists were supposed to leave the study of DNA
to the lab at King’s College. Francis Crick, age 35 in 1951, was working
on his PhD in the crystallography of proteins. He had grown up in a small
English village and, since he had failed to qualify for Cambridge, took his
undergraduate degree in physics from the University of London. Watson,
only 23 in 1951, was at Cambridge as a postdoctorate fellow in biology with
limited knowledge of chemistry. He had grown up in Chicago, performed
on the national radio show “Whiz Kids,” entered the University of Chicago
at age 15, and secured his doctorate from the University of Indiana at just
22. He was at the Cambridge lab to learn crystallography.
8 	9
James Watson and Francis Crick in 1959
The news gets out
The April 25, 1953 issue of Nature published Crick and Watson’s 900-word
article, “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Wilkins and Franklin,
who both accepted Crick and Watson’s solution, wrote accompanying articles.
By the 1960s scientists generally embraced the double helix as the structure
of DNA, and in 1962 Wilkins, Watson, and Crick received the Nobel Prize in
medicine/physiology for their work.
Franklin could not share in the prize as it cannot be granted to someone who
has passed away. She had died from ovarian cancer at the age of 37 on April
16, 1958, in London. She had a family history of cancer, but her exposure
to X-rays may have contributed to her death. And in any case, she may not
have had the chance for the award had she been alive. Crick and Watson
Between 1951 and January 1953 Franklin reasoned through her precise
X-ray diffraction images that: 1) DNA takes two forms (shorter-dryer and
longer-wetter), 2) the sugar-phosphate backbones must be on the outside,
and 3) the molecule looks the same upside down or right side up. In late
1952 she recorded an especially clear X-ray diffraction image that her col-
league, Maurice Wilkins, later showed to Watson in January 1953 without
telling Franklin or asking her permission. Franklin and Wilkins did not
always communicate well, so his actions were perhaps not surprising.
Watson knew at once from seeing Franklin’s photograph that DNA had to
be a helix with certain dimensions. He was so excited that he returned
to his lab to draw up plans for models that the machine shop would con-
struct out of sheet metal and wire.
In building their models, Watson and Crick had to find the answers to
several questions. How many strands did the helix have? Which direction
did the strands run? Were they on the inside or the outside? How were
the four chemical bases arranged?
While Franklin believed the answers would come with more X-ray images of
better quality, Watson and Crick recognized they were racing against Linus
Pauling for a solution and thought that making a model would speed up
the answers. First, they tried using two strands, putting them in the center
of the model with the bases on the outside; however, this did not produce a
chemically acceptable structure.
Next, they played around with the shapes of the four bases, using paper
models and combining them in different ways. Finally, they visualized a
structure that solved the puzzle: If two of the bases were bonded in pairs
(G with C), they took up the same space as the other pair (A with T).
Hence, they could be arranged like steps on a spiral staircase inside of two
strands of sugar-phosphates running in opposite directions.
These insights occurred to Crick and Watson between February 4 and
February 28, when they announced at lunch in their usual pub that they had
found the secret of life.
10 	11
Sources
Bryson, Bill. A Short History of Nearly Everything, 398–415. New York:
Broadway, 2003.
Judson, Horace Freeland. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the
Revolution in Biology. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003.
Maddox, Brenda. Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA. New York:
Harper Collins, 2002.
Watson, James D. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery
of the Structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum, 1968.
Watson, James D. and Francis Crick. “A Structure for Deoxyribose
Nucleic Acid.” Nature. April 25, 1953, vol. 171. Annotated version available
at http://www.exploratorium.edu/origins/coldspring/ideas/printit.html
Wilkins, Maurice. The Third Man of the Double Helix: The Autobiography
of Maurice Wilkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
never told Franklin that they had used her images (She was mentioned only
in passing by Crick and Watson in Nature). Nor did Watson explain this in his
popular account of their discovery, The Double Helix (1968).
It wasn’t until much later that Watson finally admitted in public that he and
Crick could not have found the double helix in 1953 without Franklin’s
experimental work. If she had survived, would she have been acknowledged
and shared in the prize?
In their 1953 article Watson and Crick did not discuss how DNA copies itself.
They simply included this sentence: “It has not escaped our notice that the
specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying
mechanism for the genetic material.”
Five weeks after their first article in Nature, Crick and Watson published
another article proposing the idea that, to make a copy, the double helix un-
zips, or separates, into two strands — each a backbone of sugar-phosphates
with the four bases attached in some sequence. Then the cell uses each
strand as a template to assemble another DNA strand from free-floating
complementary bases: A picks up T, while C picks up G. This would result in
two identical DNA molecules, one a copy of the other. Occasional mistakes
in copying enable evolution to occur and each organism to be unique. This
idea has been confirmed, while the means for carrying it out have proved to
be immensely complex.
Crick continued his research in England until 1976, when he moved to the
Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, where he died
in 2004. Watson returned to the United States, researching at Harvard from
1956 to 1976. He helped establish the Human Genome Project in the early
1990s and served as president of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on
Long Island, New York, until his retirement in 2007.
12
Image credits
Francis Crick in 1962
© Bettmann/CORBIS
James Watson
© Bettmann/CORBIS
Rosalind Franklin
© Science Source
An illustration of the DNA double helix
© the Big History Project
Rosalind Franklin working at King’s College in London
© Science Source
James Watson and Francis Crick in 1959
© Bettmann/CORBIS

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Genetics 2 2
Genetics 2 2Genetics 2 2
Genetics 2 2
bouts1cm
 
Genetics 2
Genetics 2Genetics 2
Genetics 2
bouts1cm
 
Genetics 2
Genetics 2Genetics 2
Genetics 2
bouts1cm
 
Nature review rosalind franklin
Nature review rosalind franklinNature review rosalind franklin
Nature review rosalind franklin
Ultramolecular
 
Dna double helix (2 class)
Dna double helix (2 class)Dna double helix (2 class)
Dna double helix (2 class)
Sofía Paz Mogro
 
Rosalind elsie franklin
Rosalind elsie franklinRosalind elsie franklin
Rosalind elsie franklin
emilymescher
 
Identification of genetic material
Identification of genetic materialIdentification of genetic material
Identification of genetic material
Bruno Mmassy
 
DNA as genetic material
DNA as genetic materialDNA as genetic material
DNA as genetic material
Sayma Zerin
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Discovering DNA Timeline
Discovering DNA TimelineDiscovering DNA Timeline
Discovering DNA Timeline
 
History of DNA Development
History of DNA DevelopmentHistory of DNA Development
History of DNA Development
 
DNA Notes
DNA NotesDNA Notes
DNA Notes
 
Fatima kharbe watson n crick model of dna
Fatima kharbe watson n crick model of dnaFatima kharbe watson n crick model of dna
Fatima kharbe watson n crick model of dna
 
Discovery dna
Discovery  dnaDiscovery  dna
Discovery dna
 
History of molecular biology
History of molecular biologyHistory of molecular biology
History of molecular biology
 
Genetics 2 2
Genetics 2 2Genetics 2 2
Genetics 2 2
 
Genetics 2
Genetics 2Genetics 2
Genetics 2
 
Genetics 2
Genetics 2Genetics 2
Genetics 2
 
BU5.1 DNA Structure & Function
BU5.1 DNA Structure & FunctionBU5.1 DNA Structure & Function
BU5.1 DNA Structure & Function
 
DNA
DNADNA
DNA
 
Nature review rosalind franklin
Nature review rosalind franklinNature review rosalind franklin
Nature review rosalind franklin
 
Dna double helix (2 class)
Dna double helix (2 class)Dna double helix (2 class)
Dna double helix (2 class)
 
Watson and crick model of dna
Watson and crick model of dnaWatson and crick model of dna
Watson and crick model of dna
 
Rosalind elsie franklin
Rosalind elsie franklinRosalind elsie franklin
Rosalind elsie franklin
 
Identification of genetic material
Identification of genetic materialIdentification of genetic material
Identification of genetic material
 
Erwin chargaff
Erwin chargaffErwin chargaff
Erwin chargaff
 
DNA double helix
DNA double helixDNA double helix
DNA double helix
 
DNA as genetic material
DNA as genetic materialDNA as genetic material
DNA as genetic material
 
AP Bio Ch 16 part 1
AP Bio Ch 16 part 1AP Bio Ch 16 part 1
AP Bio Ch 16 part 1
 

Destacado

Destacado (8)

Lesson 4.0 Activity: Active Accretion
Lesson 4.0 Activity: Active AccretionLesson 4.0 Activity: Active Accretion
Lesson 4.0 Activity: Active Accretion
 
4.5 What Do You Know? What Do You Ask?
4.5 What Do You Know? What Do You Ask?4.5 What Do You Know? What Do You Ask?
4.5 What Do You Know? What Do You Ask?
 
Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?
Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?
Investigation: How and Why Do Individuals Change Their Minds?
 
Lesson 2.0 Activity: Views of the Universe Debate
Lesson 2.0 Activity: Views of the Universe DebateLesson 2.0 Activity: Views of the Universe Debate
Lesson 2.0 Activity: Views of the Universe Debate
 
Unit 3: Marie Curie Biography
Unit 3: Marie Curie BiographyUnit 3: Marie Curie Biography
Unit 3: Marie Curie Biography
 
Unit 2: Isaac Newton
Unit 2: Isaac NewtonUnit 2: Isaac Newton
Unit 2: Isaac Newton
 
Unit 8: Comparing Maps
Unit 8: Comparing MapsUnit 8: Comparing Maps
Unit 8: Comparing Maps
 
Unit 9: Acceleration
Unit 9: AccelerationUnit 9: Acceleration
Unit 9: Acceleration
 

Similar a Unit 5: Watson, Crick, & Franklin

DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdfDNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
anujsharmaanuj14
 

Similar a Unit 5: Watson, Crick, & Franklin (7)

Lecture 1 part.2 Structure and Function of Nucleic Acid
Lecture 1 part.2 Structure and Function of Nucleic AcidLecture 1 part.2 Structure and Function of Nucleic Acid
Lecture 1 part.2 Structure and Function of Nucleic Acid
 
DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdfDNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
DNA controversy is a dispute about whether Rosalind Franklin and Wil.pdf
 
The discovery of DNA
The discovery of DNAThe discovery of DNA
The discovery of DNA
 
DNA as genetic material (SV).ppt
DNA as genetic material (SV).pptDNA as genetic material (SV).ppt
DNA as genetic material (SV).ppt
 
Klug dna
Klug dnaKlug dna
Klug dna
 
Contribution of Physicists and Chemists in Biology
Contribution of Physicists and Chemists in BiologyContribution of Physicists and Chemists in Biology
Contribution of Physicists and Chemists in Biology
 
History of genetics
History of geneticsHistory of genetics
History of genetics
 

Más de Big History Project

Más de Big History Project (20)

Unit 9 Extension: Impacts of Interconnection
Unit 9 Extension: Impacts of InterconnectionUnit 9 Extension: Impacts of Interconnection
Unit 9 Extension: Impacts of Interconnection
 
Lesson 10.3 Activity: First Contact
Lesson 10.3 Activity: First ContactLesson 10.3 Activity: First Contact
Lesson 10.3 Activity: First Contact
 
Unit 10: Are We Alone? Now Is the Time to Find Out
Unit 10: Are We Alone? Now Is the Time to Find OutUnit 10: Are We Alone? Now Is the Time to Find Out
Unit 10: Are We Alone? Now Is the Time to Find Out
 
Unit 9: Comparing the Costs of Renewable and Conventional Energy Sources
Unit 9: Comparing the Costs of Renewable and Conventional Energy SourcesUnit 9: Comparing the Costs of Renewable and Conventional Energy Sources
Unit 9: Comparing the Costs of Renewable and Conventional Energy Sources
 
Lesson 9.8 Activity: Surviving on Mars (Part 1)
Lesson 9.8 Activity: Surviving on Mars (Part 1)Lesson 9.8 Activity: Surviving on Mars (Part 1)
Lesson 9.8 Activity: Surviving on Mars (Part 1)
 
Lesson 9.6 Activity: Mapping the World
Lesson 9.6 Activity: Mapping the WorldLesson 9.6 Activity: Mapping the World
Lesson 9.6 Activity: Mapping the World
 
Unit 9: Smith, Marx, and Keynes
Unit 9: Smith, Marx, and KeynesUnit 9: Smith, Marx, and Keynes
Unit 9: Smith, Marx, and Keynes
 
Unit 9: Collective Learning (Part 4)
Unit 9: Collective Learning (Part 4)Unit 9: Collective Learning (Part 4)
Unit 9: Collective Learning (Part 4)
 
Lesson 9.2 Activity: The Impact of Population Growth Essay
Lesson 9.2 Activity: The Impact of Population Growth EssayLesson 9.2 Activity: The Impact of Population Growth Essay
Lesson 9.2 Activity: The Impact of Population Growth Essay
 
Unit 8: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
Unit 8: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human SocietiesUnit 8: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
Unit 8: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
 
Unit 8: Investigation 8
Unit 8: Investigation 8Unit 8: Investigation 8
Unit 8: Investigation 8
 
Lesson 8.3 Activity: Revising Investigation Writing - Sentence Starters Part 2
Lesson 8.3 Activity: Revising Investigation Writing - Sentence Starters Part 2Lesson 8.3 Activity: Revising Investigation Writing - Sentence Starters Part 2
Lesson 8.3 Activity: Revising Investigation Writing - Sentence Starters Part 2
 
Unit 8: When Humans Became Inhumane: The Atlantic Slave Trade
Unit 8: When Humans Became Inhumane: The Atlantic Slave TradeUnit 8: When Humans Became Inhumane: The Atlantic Slave Trade
Unit 8: When Humans Became Inhumane: The Atlantic Slave Trade
 
Unit 8: Investigating the Consequences of the Columbian Exchange
Unit 8: Investigating the Consequences of the Columbian ExchangeUnit 8: Investigating the Consequences of the Columbian Exchange
Unit 8: Investigating the Consequences of the Columbian Exchange
 
Unit 8: Ibn Battuta
Unit 8: Ibn BattutaUnit 8: Ibn Battuta
Unit 8: Ibn Battuta
 
Lesson 8.1 Activity: An Age of Adventure
Lesson 8.1 Activity: An Age of AdventureLesson 8.1 Activity: An Age of Adventure
Lesson 8.1 Activity: An Age of Adventure
 
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Essay - Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Essay - Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?Lesson 7.2 Activity: Essay - Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Essay - Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?
 
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Social Status, Power, and Human Burials
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Social Status, Power, and Human BurialsLesson 7.2 Activity: Social Status, Power, and Human Burials
Lesson 7.2 Activity: Social Status, Power, and Human Burials
 
Unit 7: Greco-Roman: Early Experiments in Participatory Government
Unit 7: Greco-Roman: Early Experiments in Participatory GovernmentUnit 7: Greco-Roman: Early Experiments in Participatory Government
Unit 7: Greco-Roman: Early Experiments in Participatory Government
 
Unit 7: Agrarian Civilizations: Introduction
Unit 7: Agrarian Civilizations: IntroductionUnit 7: Agrarian Civilizations: Introduction
Unit 7: Agrarian Civilizations: Introduction
 

Último

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
MateoGardella
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 

Último (20)

Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 

Unit 5: Watson, Crick, & Franklin

  • 2. By Lorem Ipsum Born February 12, 1809 Shrewsbury, England Died April 19, 1882 Downe, England CRICK, WATSON, AND FRANKLIN THE RACE TO DISCOVER THE STRUCTURE OF DNA Rosalind Franklin Born July 25, 1920 London Died April 16, 1958 London Francis Crick Born June 8, 1916 Northampton, England Died July 28, 2004 San Diego, California James Watson Born April 6, 1928 Chicago, Illinois By Cynthia Stokes Brown
  • 3. 2 3 In 1953, three English biochemists helped unlock the mystery of life by determining the double helix structure of the DNA molecule. Found in all life on Earth, DNA contains the information by which an organism regenerates its cells and passes traits to its offspring.
  • 4. 4 5 Setting the stage Despite his success in formulating the theory of natural selection, Charles Darwin did not yet understand how characteristics are passed from parent organisms to their offspring with the slight changes that make evolution possible and identify each individual. By the middle of the 20th century this was still not well understood. The first part of the century had seen major breakthroughs in physics, such as Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and atomic bombs that used the energy of nuclear fusion. After World War II scientists turned to understanding the physical basis (atomic and molecular) of biological phenomena. In the 1950s biochemists realized that DNA, short for deoxyribonucleic acid, delivered the instructions for copying a new organism. A yard of DNA is folded and packed into the nucleus of every cell in pairs called “chromo- somes,” with one exception: in the reproductive cells, where the pieces of DNA are not paired. DNA has three constituents: 1) a type of sugar called “ribose”; 2) a phos- phate (phosphorous surrounded by oxygen) responsible for its acidity; and 3) four kinds of bases — adenine (A), thymine (T), guanine (G), and cytosine (C). Since these four bases seemed too simple to be able to pass on all the information needed to create a new organism, biochemists were baffled about DNA’s structure and how it worked. However, these four bases com- bine like letters of an alphabet to describe complex variations in genetic traits. The question became how to study the DNA molecule. Biochemists believed that understanding its structure would reveal how the molecule coded the instructions for copying a new organism. They began taking X-ray images of crystals of DNA, believing that its crystallization meant it must have a regu- lar structure. The pattern of the X-rays bouncing off atoms (a phenomenon called “diffraction”) gave information about their location in the molecule. One of the pioneers of this technique, called “X-ray crystallography,” was Linus Pauling, who worked at the California Institute of Technology in Pasa-
  • 5. 6 7 Rosalind Franklin working at King’s College in London dena. In the early 1950s Pauling, a prominent chemist doing molecular re- search in the States, seemed a likely candidate to unlock the mystery of life, since he had already concluded that the general shape of DNA must be a helix, or spiral. The race The victory, however, went to three people working in England, in one of the great scientific races of all time. One, Rosalind Franklin was working at King’s College at the University of London. The other two, James Watson and Francis Crick were friends and lab mates some 50 miles away at the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University, where they worked coopera- tively and shared their ideas. Franklin was from a wealthy, influential family in London. She had earned her PhD in 1945 from Cambridge in physical chemistry. Starting at King’s College in 1951 at the age of 31, she was focused on studying DNA. She became extremely skilled in X-ray crystallography, able to produce clear and accurate diffraction images of DNA crystals by using fine-focus X-ray equipment and pure DNA samples. Over in Cambridge, biochemists were supposed to leave the study of DNA to the lab at King’s College. Francis Crick, age 35 in 1951, was working on his PhD in the crystallography of proteins. He had grown up in a small English village and, since he had failed to qualify for Cambridge, took his undergraduate degree in physics from the University of London. Watson, only 23 in 1951, was at Cambridge as a postdoctorate fellow in biology with limited knowledge of chemistry. He had grown up in Chicago, performed on the national radio show “Whiz Kids,” entered the University of Chicago at age 15, and secured his doctorate from the University of Indiana at just 22. He was at the Cambridge lab to learn crystallography.
  • 6. 8 9 James Watson and Francis Crick in 1959 The news gets out The April 25, 1953 issue of Nature published Crick and Watson’s 900-word article, “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Wilkins and Franklin, who both accepted Crick and Watson’s solution, wrote accompanying articles. By the 1960s scientists generally embraced the double helix as the structure of DNA, and in 1962 Wilkins, Watson, and Crick received the Nobel Prize in medicine/physiology for their work. Franklin could not share in the prize as it cannot be granted to someone who has passed away. She had died from ovarian cancer at the age of 37 on April 16, 1958, in London. She had a family history of cancer, but her exposure to X-rays may have contributed to her death. And in any case, she may not have had the chance for the award had she been alive. Crick and Watson Between 1951 and January 1953 Franklin reasoned through her precise X-ray diffraction images that: 1) DNA takes two forms (shorter-dryer and longer-wetter), 2) the sugar-phosphate backbones must be on the outside, and 3) the molecule looks the same upside down or right side up. In late 1952 she recorded an especially clear X-ray diffraction image that her col- league, Maurice Wilkins, later showed to Watson in January 1953 without telling Franklin or asking her permission. Franklin and Wilkins did not always communicate well, so his actions were perhaps not surprising. Watson knew at once from seeing Franklin’s photograph that DNA had to be a helix with certain dimensions. He was so excited that he returned to his lab to draw up plans for models that the machine shop would con- struct out of sheet metal and wire. In building their models, Watson and Crick had to find the answers to several questions. How many strands did the helix have? Which direction did the strands run? Were they on the inside or the outside? How were the four chemical bases arranged? While Franklin believed the answers would come with more X-ray images of better quality, Watson and Crick recognized they were racing against Linus Pauling for a solution and thought that making a model would speed up the answers. First, they tried using two strands, putting them in the center of the model with the bases on the outside; however, this did not produce a chemically acceptable structure. Next, they played around with the shapes of the four bases, using paper models and combining them in different ways. Finally, they visualized a structure that solved the puzzle: If two of the bases were bonded in pairs (G with C), they took up the same space as the other pair (A with T). Hence, they could be arranged like steps on a spiral staircase inside of two strands of sugar-phosphates running in opposite directions. These insights occurred to Crick and Watson between February 4 and February 28, when they announced at lunch in their usual pub that they had found the secret of life.
  • 7. 10 11 Sources Bryson, Bill. A Short History of Nearly Everything, 398–415. New York: Broadway, 2003. Judson, Horace Freeland. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003. Maddox, Brenda. Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA. New York: Harper Collins, 2002. Watson, James D. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum, 1968. Watson, James D. and Francis Crick. “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.” Nature. April 25, 1953, vol. 171. Annotated version available at http://www.exploratorium.edu/origins/coldspring/ideas/printit.html Wilkins, Maurice. The Third Man of the Double Helix: The Autobiography of Maurice Wilkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. never told Franklin that they had used her images (She was mentioned only in passing by Crick and Watson in Nature). Nor did Watson explain this in his popular account of their discovery, The Double Helix (1968). It wasn’t until much later that Watson finally admitted in public that he and Crick could not have found the double helix in 1953 without Franklin’s experimental work. If she had survived, would she have been acknowledged and shared in the prize? In their 1953 article Watson and Crick did not discuss how DNA copies itself. They simply included this sentence: “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material.” Five weeks after their first article in Nature, Crick and Watson published another article proposing the idea that, to make a copy, the double helix un- zips, or separates, into two strands — each a backbone of sugar-phosphates with the four bases attached in some sequence. Then the cell uses each strand as a template to assemble another DNA strand from free-floating complementary bases: A picks up T, while C picks up G. This would result in two identical DNA molecules, one a copy of the other. Occasional mistakes in copying enable evolution to occur and each organism to be unique. This idea has been confirmed, while the means for carrying it out have proved to be immensely complex. Crick continued his research in England until 1976, when he moved to the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, where he died in 2004. Watson returned to the United States, researching at Harvard from 1956 to 1976. He helped establish the Human Genome Project in the early 1990s and served as president of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, New York, until his retirement in 2007.
  • 8. 12 Image credits Francis Crick in 1962 © Bettmann/CORBIS James Watson © Bettmann/CORBIS Rosalind Franklin © Science Source An illustration of the DNA double helix © the Big History Project Rosalind Franklin working at King’s College in London © Science Source James Watson and Francis Crick in 1959 © Bettmann/CORBIS