SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
R e g i s t e r b y J a n u a r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 1 a n d R e c e i v e $ 3 0 0 O f f o f Yo u r R e g i s t r a t i o n F e e !

                                                            CBi’s 4th annual forum                                               on


                            Clinical Trial Management
                                 Systems (CTMS)
                                        Adoption, Integration and Management Solutions
                                             to Maximize the Value of Investments
                            March 24-25, 2011                             •    crowne Plaza                •      PhiladelPhia, Pa
                                                                                                                                                      Balanced
                                                                                                                                                     perspectives
                              ConferenCe Chairperson:                                           Leverage CTMS to enable strategic                 regarding various
                                                                                                                                                    types of CTMS
                                     Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy,                 clinical operational efficiencies                      systems
                                             Oracle Health Sciences

                                                                                                Analyze criteria used to make a CTMS selection
                                           fDa aDDress:
                                 “Understand Potential Regulatory                               Learn the benefits and challenges of co-developing a
                                Issues and Inspection Expectations”
                                  Jonathan S. Helfgott, Consumer Safety Officer,
                                                                                                CTMS with a CRO versus purchasing an application
                                    CDRH’s Division of Bioresearch Monitoring,
                                        Food and Drug Administration                            Understand resource requirements for data migration
                                                                                                resulting from a merger of two separate systems
                                       national CanCer
                                      institute aDDress                                         Manage shared CTMS data between sponsor and CRO
                             “NCI Update on the (caBIG ) Initiative” ®

                               David Loose, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical               Adapt CTMS to incorporate payment structure shifts
                                Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT)
                                 Bill Dyer, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical               Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) through
                                Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT)
                                                                                                CTMS simplification
                                      aCaDemiC meDiCal                                       Choose Between Two Pre-Conference Workshops — Thursday, March 24, 2011
                                       Center aDDress:
                                 “A Site-Based Approach to CTMS”
                                                                                           A. Increase ROI     B. Build Organizational
                              Anthony Leiro, Manager, Business Architecture, Information
                                Technology, Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI)           through an          Bridges for Cross-Functional
                                                                                              Effective CTMS      Collaboration and
                                       Case stuDies anD                                       Training Program    Decision-Making
                                      perspeCtives from:
                              BioPharm Systems • DSP Clinical Research                     Presenting                                  Lead Media Partner:
                                                                                           Sponsor:
                              Ferring International PharmaScience Centre
                              Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group
Artwork by: Getty Images




                                 GlaxoSmithKline • Merck & Co., Inc.
                             Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company                       Organized by:                               Lead Media Partner:

                                  Perceptive Informatics • Quintiles
                             sanofi-aventis • Sanofi Pasteur • Target Health
                                                                                                               A Subsidiary of         For more information, please visit us
                                                                                                                                       on the web at www.cbinet.com/ctms
Choose f rom Two Pre-Conference Work shops – Thursday, Ma rch 24, 2011
                        7:30          Workshop Registration and Continental Breakfast
                      8:30 • Workshop A                                                                 8:30 • Workshop B
                                                                                       Build Organizational Bridges
      Increase ROI through an Effective
                                                                                  for Cross-Functional Collaboration and
          CTMS Training Program
                                                                                             Decision-Making
Workshop Objective:                                                        Workshop Objective:

User adoption is the key to achieving a rapid ROI for                      CTMS systems are utilized by many key stakeholders, both internal
your CTMS and the key to user adoption is an effective                     and external to the organization. There are individuals that make
training program. Such training programs are based on                      decisions regarding the system; those that support the system; and
a careful analysis of an organization’s culture and the                    those that use the system. It is important to realize that decisions
characteristics of its end-users. All training programs                    regarding CTMS impact all key stakeholders and therefore
should be multi-faceted, comprehensive and long-term in                    processes for collaboration are critical. This workshop covers
scope. But, depending on the organization, the details of a                cross-organization collaboration and decision-making while also
program can be tailored to meet the needs of the end-users                 focusing on the relationship with CROs, between the business and
and the organization as a whole. Effective CTMS training                   technical teams as well as key end-users.
programs leave users feeling well-equipped to begin using                  Key Questions to Be Addressed:
the system and fully supported as they master it. This
workshop presents a variety of methods for achieving these                 •	 Who	should	be	involved	in	a	cross-functional	advisory	committee?
goals and discusses how to choose from these methods to                    •	 What	is	the	impact	of	CTMS	changes	on	other	clinical	systems?
build a training program that is right for your organization.              •	 How	is	a	stronger	relationship	between	business	and	technical	
                                                                              teams	created?
Key Questions to Be Addressed:                                             •	 How	is	feedback	from	end-users	incorporated	into	the	
                                                                              decision-making	process?
•	 How	do	adults	learn?
                                                                           Workshop Outline:
•	 What	are	the	different	approaches	to	software	training?
•	 Which	approaches	make	sense	in	different	types	                         I.        Ensure Cross-Functional Decision-Making for
   of	organizations?                                                                 CTMS Systems
•	 How	can	we	best	prepare	users	to	start	using	the	system?                         •	 Understand	business	priorities	and	current	
•	 How	can	we	continue	to	support	users	over	time?                                     decision-making structure
                                                                                    •	 Create	a	cross-functional	key	stakeholder	advisory	
Workshop Outline:                                                                      committee to address questions
                                                                                       * level of access granted to CROs and other business
I.      Understand How Adults Learn                                                      partners that comply with privacy regulations
          •	 Motivating	them	to	learn                                               •	 Make	key	decisions	for	CTMS	initiatives	
          •	 Helping	them	retain	what	they	learn                                       * business process changes impacting initiatives
                                                                                         timeline changes
          •	 Helping	them	apply	what	they	learn
                                                                                    •	 Implement	a	Change	Control	Board	(CCB)	
II.     Analyze Your CTMS User Group                                                   * evaluate changes to system itself, both business and technical
          •	 Organizational	culture                                                    * determine impact of CTMS changes on other clinical systems
          •	 Number	and	types	of	users                                     II.       Create Stronger Relationship between Technical
          •	 Location	of	users                                                       Operations and Business
                                                                                    •	 Understand	change	requests	from	business
III.    Develop Your Training Program/Strategy                                      •	 Evaluate	issues	impacting	systems
          •	 Short-term	—	Initial	rollout                                           •	 Eliminate	technical	and	business	silos
          •	 Medium-term	—	
             Reference materials and refreshers                            III.      End-User Forums to Provide Consistent Feedback
          •	 Long-term	—	                                                           •	 Grass-roots	forum	where	users	can	voice	concerns,	challenges	
             Clear and effective support structure                                  •	 Discuss	best	practices	
                                                                                    •	 Hear	lessons	learned	to	date
12:00    Close of Workshop A                                                     12:00    Close of Workshop B
There will be a 30-minute networking and refreshment break at 10:00 a.m.
                                                                                 There will be a 30-minute networking and refreshment break at 10:00 a.m.
Workshop Leaders:                                                                Workshop Leader:
Parambir Singh, Vice President, BioPharm Systems, Inc
                                                                                 Amy Black,	Global	Business	Program	Manager,	
Shannon L. Beebe, Siebel Coordinator, Covidien                                   Genentech – A Member of the Roche Group
MAIN CONFERENCE                                                                              National Cancer Institute Address
                                                                                    3:30   NCI Update on the (caBIG®) Initiative
        Day One — Thursday, March 24, 2011                                                 The cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG®) initiative,
                                                                                           overseen by the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH), National
12:00   Main Conference Registration                                                       Cancer Institute (NCI) Center for Biomedical Informatics and
1:15    Chairperson’s Opening Remarks                                                      Information Technology (CBIIT), was conceived to connect the
        Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences                  cancer research and clinical community through a semantically-
        Ms. Travers has over twenty years experience in Clinical Research working          aware service-based, open-source, interoperable technology
        in both industry and CRO environments. Her experience includes Data                that facilitates data sharing and collaboration to accelerate
        management, Clinical Monitoring, EDC, IVRS and Medical Imaging.                    the translation of discoveries from research to clinical care.
        Prior to joining Oracle, she was at Vertex Pharmaceuticals where she led           The caBIG® Clinical Trials Management Systems Workspace
        strategy and implementation of Clinical Development Systems. She was also          provides modular caBIG® software tools designed to meet
        at Perceptive Informatics (a Parexel International Company) where she led          diverse clinical trials management needs. caBIG® tools are
        efforts around IVRS, EDC and Medical Imaging.                                      configurable to work with clinical sites with little or no clinical
                                                                                           data management systems in place, as well as those with robust
                           Keynote Address                                                 systems; and take into account the diversity of clinical research
                                                                                           activities as well as local practices that exist among clinical sites.
1:30    Leverage CTMS as a Powerful Decision-Supporting Engine                             This address discusses the goals and progress of this initiative,
        Most companies today either have a CTMS or are considering                         as well as plans for the future.
        using one to manage the day-to-day activities of their trials.                     •	 Hear	about	the	goals	of	the	caBIG® initiative and the
        As the industry evolves, all the systems used to support clinical                     NCI	vision	of	interoperability
        development must evolve as well, including CTMS systems.
                                                                                           •	 Understand challenges and successes to date in
        This keynote address analyzes the potential evolution of these
        systems and offers insight into ways to ensure the CTMS enables                       deployment	of	the	caBIG® Clinical Trials Suite and the
        decisions critical to supporting future clinical trials.                              NCI	Enterprise	Services
        •	 Discuss	how	CTMS	can	enable	the	next	set	of	clinical	                           •	 Learn	the	next	steps	with	the	caBIG® initiative and
           operational efficiencies                                                           the	NCI’s	plans	for	restructuring	of	the	NCI	Clinical	
                                                                                              IT Enterprise
        •	 Transform	CTMS	for	the	future
                                                                                           David Loose, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and
        Simon Brooks, Product Champion, Integrated Clinical Research Suite,
        Oracle Health Sciences                                                             Information Technology (CBIIT)
                                                                                           Bill Dyer, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and
        Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences
                                                                                           Information Technology (CBIIT)

                              FDA Address                                                     Academic Medical Center Address
2:15    Understand Potential Regulatory Issues and                                  4:15   A Site-Based Approach to CTMS
        Inspection Expectations                                                            Clinical sites utilize CTMS systems to record data for clinical
        CTMS systems can offer operational efficiencies for the                            trials specific to the study site, not aggregated multi-site study data
        organization. However, understanding how the data needs to                         as in most sponsor-led trials. In that way, a disconnect exists in
        be handled to comply with the FDA as well as what to expect                        how the information is entered and reported between the clinical
        during an inspection is critical. This applies to any CTMS                         site and sponsor. This leads to challenges when sharing data in
        system. This address discusses the regulatory challenges and                       study collaborations with sponsors because it requires sites to
        expectations during an FDA inspection. Attendees are then                          manage their portfolio of research projects independent of the
        invited to participate in a Q&A session with the FDA.                              sponsor. Over the last three years, Duke University has deployed
        •	 Potential	FDA	regulatory	issues	when	using	CTMS	                                a site-based CTMS in conducting trials. The CTMS is being
           systems	and	its	impact	on	FDA                                                   used for over 3,000 different clinical trials and tracking the study
           * regulated clinical research activities                                        visits of more than 60,000 study participants. The trials that
           * marketing applications                                                        use CTMS range from small single-site research studies to large
           * inspections                                                                   multi-site trials. This site-based approach to CTMS provides the
                                                                                           site with tools to improve coordination of patient visits, capacity
        •	 Hear	case	examples	from	the	FDA
                                                                                           planning, billing integration, resource utilization, financial and
        •	 Examine	developing	trends	in	clinical	systems                                   regulatory compliance as well as managerial reporting. This
           * merging eClinical systems                                                     address discusses the site-based approach to CTMS and the
             (i.e.	EDC/CTMS/CDMS/IVRS)                                                     interrelationship with sponsors.
           *	use	of	EHRs                                                                   •	 Hear	an	overview	of	Duke’s	site-based	approach	
           * home healthcare in clinical research                                             to CTMS
           * clinical data standards                                                       •	 Explore	the	disconnect	between	sites	and	sponsors	
        •	 Participate	in	an	open	discussion	with	FDA                                         with data from CTMS
        Jonathan S. Helfgott, Consumer Safety Officer, CDRH’s Division of                  •	 Analyze	the	capabilities	of	the	CTMS	and	future	
        Bioresearch Monitoring, Food and Drug Administration                                  plans for enhancements
                                                                                           Anthony Leiro, Manager, Business Architecture, Information Technology,
3:00    Networking and Refreshment Break                                                   Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI)
Considerations for CTMS Selection and Adoption                                                   CTMS System Implementation Strategies
5:00         Leverage Interoperability of the CTMS as the                                  9:00    Leveraging Implementation Experience from
             eClinical Backbone for All Key Stakeholders                                           Different Business Units for Smoother Transition
             Managing programs and studies with configurable                                   sanofi-aventis (SA) has been using a CTMS since the mid-
             off-the-shelf software is a challenge. Those involved in                          1990’s. However, Sanofi Pasteur (SP), its vaccine division, has
             running a trial include the sponsor, contract research
                                                                                               only been using a CTMS since 2000. The SA implementation
             organizations, ethics committees, local and central laboratories
             and the investigative sites and patients themselves. All of                       had its challenges. In learning from them, SP has taken a
             these users have their own needs — their own specific tasks to                    more cautious roll-out approach and has changed a few of
             be recorded in, or guided by, ‘their’ software….ePRO, EDC,                        the processes involved with the implementation. To date,
             IVR, etc. So, can we even conceive one “master system” to                         the implementation has gone much smoother and has started
             coordinate milestones and data? This presentation shows                           with the capabilities of tracking milestones, written monitor
             how a CTMS can be considered a ‘backbone’ for the entire                          visits and developing clinical reporting. Future plans include
             eClinical framework. Interoperability of a CTMS is                                interfacing with clinical eDoc and EDC as well as integrating
             discussed including:                                                              with finance. This case study compares and contracts the
             •	 User	workflow                                                                  CTMS roll-outs of SA and SP, highlighting specific changes
             •	 Dashboards                                                                     in process that SP adopted as lessons learned. Also to be
             •	 Intuitive	use	of	a	CTMS                                                        discussed are future plans for the CTMS.
             •	 Notifications	to	various	users
                                                                                               •	 Examine	the	CTMS	implementations	
             •	 Tying	data	together                                                               of both SA and SP
             John Humphreys, CTMS Product Director, Perceptive Informatics
                                                                                               •	 Analyze	the	changes	made	to	ensure	a	smoother	
 5:45        Close of Day One                                                             CASE    implementation for SP
                                                                                         STUDy •	 Hear	future	plans	for	SP	CTMS				
                                                                                               Daniel O’Connell, Manager of Monitoring Systems, Clinical Study Unit,
                    5:45-6:45        Networking,                                               North America, sanofi-aventis
                                     Wine & Cheese Reception                                   William Dubost, Manager of Monitoring Systems, Sanofi Pasteur
                                     Join colleagues and friends in a relaxed setting.         Parambir Singh, Vice President, BioPharm Systems, Inc.
Photo by: Photolink / Getty Images
                                                                                            P
                                                                                           9:45    Customization of CTMS in an Outsourced Model
                Day Two — Friday, March 25, 2011                                            A      This panel discussion offers a look at Millennium’s customization
                                                                                            N      of CTMS to support their study management needs, including the
 7:30        Continental Breakfast                                                                 development of data migration and data integration components.
                                                                                            E
                                                                                                   As Millennium’s sourcing model changed during the
 8:00        Chairperson’s Review of Day One                                                L      implementation of the tool, analysis of the impact on the system
             Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences
                                                                                                   requirements and business processes are also explored.
8:15         Analysis of the Decision Whether to Co-Develop a                              Moderator: Heather Wolff, Associate Director, Data Operations,
             CTMS with an eCRO or to Buy an Existing Application                                      Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
             Ferring is a mid-sized pharmaceutical company specializing                    Panelists: David Roberts, Associate Director, Informatics,
             in treating diseases mainly through peptide/protein pathways                             Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
             and initiates about fifteen new phase I-III studies annually.                            Joe Coady, Lead Clinical Systems Developer,
             Ferring’s fourteen-year collaboration with Target Health has                             Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
             resulted in four NDA/MAA and other country approvals.                                    Kevin Lloyd, Director, Clinical Business Operations,
             In 2008, Target Health had co-developed a CTMS with an                                   Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company
             international CRO. The advantages of that collaboration
             are that there was a deep understanding of clinical research                  10:30   Networking and Refreshment Break
             operations as well the needs of pharmaceutical companies,
             clinical research sites and regulators. Having outgrown its                   11:00   Data Migration through M&A for Global System
             homemade CTMS, Ferring evaluated several CTMS vendors
             who would provide and/or build a suitable replacement.
                                                                                                   Implementation and Deployment
             This option was attractive because these systems require                              In 2009 Schering-Plough (SP) and Merck merged to diversify
             a lot of resources, both to implement and maintain; and                               its product portfolio and result in a stronger market position.
             Ferring was not in the software development business.                                 Before the merger, SP and Merck utilized different CTMS
             The system had to be user-friendly, flexible and easier to                            systems. A decision had to be made on which system to use
             interface with their EDC system. This case study analyzes                             and then data had to be migrated to the chosen system.
             that decision process, covers progress to date and offers insight                     This case study covers this process, highlighting key decision
             into challenges and future plans.                                                     points with regards to data migration and roll-out approach as
             •	 Maintain	flexibility	of	the	system                                                 well as discusses challenges faced throughout the process.
             •	 Develop	a	growth	plan	as	the	company	matures                                       •	 Understand	the	resource	requirements	of	the	data	
             •	 Understand	the	risks	involved	with	co-developing	                                     migration and user training
                a system with a CRO versus an established
 CASE                                                                                              •	 Analyze	the	process	of		Merck’s	roll-out	decision
STUDy           CTMS vendor                                                               CASE
             Jules Mitchel, President, Target Health                                     STUDy     •	 Learn	future	plans	for	CTMS	capabilities
             Silvana Cappi, MSc., MBA Executive Director, Biometrics,                              Mark Hill, Executive Director, Clinical Trial Operations, Merck & Co., Inc.
             Ferring International PharmaScience Centre                                            Chris Heider, Director, IT, Merck & Co., Inc.
“Very important forum to see what the industry is doing.”
 — 2010 Attendee, Rob Stackhouse, Associate Business Systems Director, R&D Architecture, Shire Pharmaceuticals

   Effectively Manage CTMS Post-Implementation                                             cost of ownership (TCO) of the system be reduced without
                                                                                           compromising data quality, while increasing productivity?
  11:45   Analyze the Management of Shared CTMS Data                                       This case study discusses the wider initiative within GSK
          between Sponsor and CRO                                                          regarding its clinical systems and steps taken towards
          As a function of the outsourcing relationship, sponsors                          simplification of the CTMS.
          off-load components of the clinical development process                          •	 Overview	of	the	history	of	GSK’s	CTMS
          to CROs such as patient recruitment and site management,                         •	 Hear	goals	of	the	corporate-wide	initiative
          regulatory/submission management, etc. Inevitably, as a
          part of this relationship, decisions regarding where and                         •	 Learn	the	results	to	date	on	lowering	TCO	
                                                                                      CASE    through simplification
          how the data is to be managed must be made. When the
                                                                                     STUDy
          data is collected and managed using CRO systems, often                           Anthony Cavallo, Director, Operational Data Acquisition Support Services,
          the sponsor needs the data to maintain in-house clinical                         ISS, CCSE, GlaxoSmithKline
          development which is not outsourced. This data component
          can be defined within a broader services contract or in some                  3:15    Close of Conference
          cases a contract is developed to specifically outline these
          requirements. This case study outlines the export of data to
          the sponsor to enable a distributed operational partnership.
          Best practices for managing this process are discussed.                         In RecognItIon of ouR SponSoRS:
          •	 Analyze	various	types	of	data	export
          •	 Design	the	data	model                                                             CBI Research, Inc’s corporate sponsors represent select
          •	 Ensure	data	transport	protection                                             companies that share a common mission: business advancement
          •	 Examine	the	benefits	and	pitfalls	of	this	process                             through thought leadership, strategic interaction and innovation.
 CASE                                                                                      The companies represented below are proud contributors on this
STUDy     •	 Discuss	where	the	industry	is	headed
                                                                                             program and have carefully selected messaging, branding or
          Steven W. Leypoldt, Associate Director, Business Analysis, IT, Quintiles
                                                                                         positioning statements to encourage the evaluation and investigation
  12:30   Luncheon                                                                         of quality products and/or services available. We applaud these
                                                                                            companies, as well as others that wish to join the conference,
  1:45    Customizing a CTMS to Adapt to Changing Needs                                            as important members of this event’s delegation.
      In 2006, DSP Clinical Research worked with a vendor to
      create a custom CTMS to meet their needs. Over the past                                             About Our Presenting Sponsor:
      four years, the CTMS had to be adapted on a continual basis
      to meet the evolving needs of the organization. Payment
      structure to sponsors changed from hourly to fixed-rate. DSP
      implemented internal management processes to retain control
      of the CTMS to better customize CTMS features. A strategy
      was developed to ensure excellent customer service from                                   Oracle is a leading strategic software solutions provider
      the vendor. Although the system works efficiently, there                                  to the health sciences industry. Oracle Health Sciences
      have been challenges along the way and to date it still has its                          helps pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and
      limitations. This case study discusses the process from the                            healthcare organizations become the most successful in the
      initial implementation through its adaptations. Challenges,                            world by offering the most innovative products and services
      solutions and current limitations are also presented.
                                                                                              that deliver the most compelling customer and shareholder
      •	 Examine	the	initial	collaboration	between	DSP	and	                                    value. Addressing industry requirements, Oracle provides
         its CTMS vendor
                                                                                             comprehensive solutions including clinical trial management
      •	 Analyze	the	adaptations	made	to	the	system                                         and analysis, electronic data capture, adverse event reporting
 CASE
STUDy •	 Discuss	benefits,	challenges	and	current	limitations                                    and pharmacovigilance and healthcare interoperability.
      Brenda Reese, Vice President of Business Operations,                                      Oracle partners with health sciences industry leaders to
          DSP Clinical Research                                                                prevent and cure disease and enhance quality of life and
                                                                                                          accelerate insights for better health.
  2:30    Customization versus Simplification —
          Getting Back to Basics to Lower TCO
          Over the years, GSK has customized many facets of their                                                 Additional Sponsors:
          CTMS system based on the needs of different therapeutic
          areas, business areas, etc. Although customizations prove
          to be useful, they are both expensive to support and can
          present challenges in upgrading to newer versions. GSK
          decided to simplify its CTMS, or get back to basics.
          Can the same processes be supported using core system                                   If you are interested in sponsorship or exhibit opportunities,
          functionality? What level of customization is necessary                         please call Alexa Moore at 339-298-2107 or email alexa.moore@cbinet.com
          versus configuration of the base product? Can the total

   To Register Call Toll Free 800-817-8601 (339-298-2100 outside the U.S.) or
     Fax 781-939-2490. Register on our website at www.cbinet.com/ctms
R e g i s t e r b y J a n u a r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 1 a n d R e c e i v e $ 3 0 0 O f f o f Yo u r R e g i s t r a t i o n F e e !

                                                                                                                                                              • Utilize CTMS as the sole “master system”
                                  CBi’s 4th annual forum on                                                                                                     to coordinate milestones and data
                                                                                                                                                              • Examine implementation changes resulting from

Clinical Trial Management                                                                                                                                       experience with one business unit to another
                                                                                                                                                              • Understand the benefits of a site-based approach


     Systems (CTMS)
                                                                                                                                                                to CTMS
                                                                                                                                                              • Benchmark against other industry professionals
                                                                                                                                                                with peer-to-peer networking

  Adoption, Integration and Management Solutions                                                                                                                  PlUS! Choose from Two Pre-Conference
       to Maximize the Value of Investments                                                                                                                       Workshops — Thursday, March 24, 2011
                                                                                                                                                               A. Increase ROI     B. Build Organizational
                                                                                                                                                                  through an          Bridges for Cross-Functional
               March 24-25, 2011 • crowne Plaza                                                                                                                   Effective CTMS      Collaboration and
                       philaDelphia, pa                                                                                                                           Training Program    Decision-Making


     The Next Best Thing to Being There…                                                           CBI                                                                                                                           PRSRT STD
                                                                                                   600 Unicorn Park Drive • Woburn, MA 01801                                                                                     U.S. Postage
Order the Online Compendium if you would like to capture what you’ve missed
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    PAID
at the conference. It couldn’t be easier. The link to the online compendium is
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Gallery
available for only $198 and includes the conference agenda, presentations and
 speakers’ biographies. Don’t miss out on this valuable information presented
  by industry leaders exclusively at this event. Simply fill out the order form
     and submit via phone, fax or website and you’ll receive the link to the
           Online Compendium within 2 weeks after the conference.


•	 Registration Fee:                Standard         Advantage Pricing
  Conference & Workshop      $2,095            $1,795
  Conference only            $1,795            $1,495
  Advantage Pricing — Register by January 21, 2011, 2010 and SAVE $300.
  Fee includes continental breakfast, lunch, wine and cheese reception, refreshments
  and Online Compendium. Please make checks (in U.S. funds drawn on a U.S. bank)                    registration Card                              DO NOT REMOVE MAILING LABEL. PLEASE RETURN ENTIRE FORM.                   PC11134
  payable to CBI Research, Inc. (No personal checks accepted) Advantage Pricing may
  not be combined with other discount offers, special category rates or promotions.                       Yes! Please register me for CBI’s 4th Annual Forum on Clinical Trial Management Systems (CTMS).
  Discounts only apply to standard rates.
•	 Team Discount:                                                                                         Conference & Workshop A          Conference & Workshop B          Conference only
  Your organization may send 1 executive free for every 3 delegates registered.                           I am registering for ADVANTAGE PRICING         We would like to take advantage of the TEAM DISCOUNT (see left for details).
  All registrations must be made at the same time to qualify.
•	 Accommodations:                                                                                        Yes! Please send me the link to the Online Compendium. I am unable to attend the conference.
  To receive CBI’s special discounted hotel rate on line or by phone, please go to:                                                                                                                                               Register 3
  • On-line: www.cbinet.com/CTMS                                                                   Do you have any special needs? ________________________________________________                                                Get 1 FREE
  • Phone reservations: 888.233.9527 and mention CBI’s CTMS Conference.                            KEY CODE (appears above mailing address): ___________________________________
  Cut-off date is March 9, 2011. Reservations made after the cut-off date or
  after group room block has been filled (whichever comes first) will be accepted                  1. NAME                                                       POSITION
  on a space and rate availability basis. Rooms are limited so please book early.
  All travel arrangements are subject to availability.                                             2. NAME                                                       POSITION
•	 Venue:                                                                                          3. NAME                                                       POSITION
  Crowne Plaza
  1800 Market Street • Philadelphia, PA 19103                                                      4. NAME                                                       POSITION
  Hotel reservations: 888.233.9527                                                                                                                                                                                           Free
  Hotel direct line: 215.561.7500                                                                  COMPANY                                                       DIVISION
•	 Substitution & Cancellation:                                                                    ADDRESS
  Your registration may be transferred to a member of your organization up to 24 hours
  in advance of the conference. Cancellations received in writing on or before 14 days             CITY                                                          STATE/COUNTRY                    ZIP/POSTAL CODE
  prior to the start date of the event will be refunded, less a $195 administrative charge.
  No refunds will be made after this date; however, the registration fee less the $195             TELEPHONE                                                     FAx                              E-MAIL
  administrative charge can be credited to another CBI conference if you register within
  30 days from the date of this conference to an alternative CBI conference scheduled              AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
  within the next six months. In case of conference cancellation, CBI’s liability is limited to
  refund of the conference registration fee only. CBI reserves the right to alter this program     Payment Options: Payment in full is required to process registration. Please call with any payment questions.
  without prior notice. Please Note: Speakers and agenda are subject to change. In the
  event of a speaker cancellation, every effort to find a suitable replacement will be made               Enclosed is a check for payment in full (No personal checks accepted)                                                        Please
  without notice. The opinions of the conference faculty do not necessarily reflect those of                                                                                                                                         photocopy
  the companies they represent or The Center for Business Intelligence.                                   MC/Visa:                                                                                                                  this form for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     additional
•	 Satisfaction Guaranteed:                                                                               Amex:                                                                                                                      delegates.
  CBI stands behind the quality of its conferences. If you are not satisfied with the
  quality of the conference, a credit will be awarded towards a comparable                         NAME (AS APPEARS ON CARD)                                                                                     ExP. DATE
  CBI conference of your choice. Please contact 800-817-8601 for further information.
                                                                                                   CARDHOLDER SIGNATURE
  Advanced preparation for CBI conferences is not required.


                                                        WeBSiTe                           Phone                             fAX                                e-MAil                                           MAil
  5 Easy Ways                                           www.cbinet.com/
                                                        CTMS
                                                                                          800-817-8601                      781-939-2490                       cbireg@cbinet.com                                CBI Registration Dept.
                                                                                          339-298-2100                                                         Please include all information                   600 Unicorn Park Drive
  to REgistER                                                                             outside the U.S.                                                     requested on registration card.                  Woburn, MA 01801

More Related Content

More from Perficient

How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-Copy
How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-CopyHow St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-Copy
How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-CopyPerficient
 
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public Databases
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public DatabasesEvaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public Databases
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public DatabasesPerficient
 
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...Perficient
 
The Perils of Clinical Trial Budgeting
The Perils of Clinical Trial BudgetingThe Perils of Clinical Trial Budgeting
The Perils of Clinical Trial BudgetingPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data MigrationPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other SystemsPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B InterchangePerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...Perficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse ImplementationPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OCPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel ClinicalPerficient
 
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...Perficient
 
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO Data
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO DataApproaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO Data
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO DataPerficient
 
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or Fiction
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or FictionCloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or Fiction
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or FictionPerficient
 
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?Perficient
 

More from Perficient (20)

How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-Copy
How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-CopyHow St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-Copy
How St. Jude Medical Manages Oracle Clinical Studies Using Accel-Copy
 
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public Databases
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public DatabasesEvaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public Databases
Evaluating and Investigating Drug Safety Signals with Public Databases
 
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...
Plug & Play: Benefits of Out-of-the-Box Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) ...
 
The Perils of Clinical Trial Budgeting
The Perils of Clinical Trial BudgetingThe Perils of Clinical Trial Budgeting
The Perils of Clinical Trial Budgeting
 
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
 
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration
2013 OHSUG - The Ins and Outs of CTMS Data Migration
 
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems
2013 OHSUG - Siebel Clinical Integration with Other Systems
 
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...
2013 OHSUG - Sharing CTMS Data between Sponsors and Contract Research Organiz...
 
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...
2013 OHSUG - Oracle Clinical and RDC Training for Data Management and Clinica...
 
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...
2013 OHSUG - Merging Multiple Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Databases int...
 
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange
2013 OHSUG - Integration of Argus and Other Products Using the E2B Interchange
 
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
2013 OHSUG - Use Cases for Using the Program Type View in Oracle Life Science...
 
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...
2013 OHSUG - Facilitating Pharmacovigilance Globalization with Process Reengi...
 
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation
2013 OHSUG - Clinical Data Warehouse Implementation
 
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC
2013 OHSUG - Best Practices for Setting up the CDA Repository for CTMS/OC
 
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical
2013 OHSUG - Benefits of Out-of-the-Box-CDA for Siebel Clinical
 
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...
2013 OHSUG - Using Oracle's Empirica Topics to Document Your Signal Managemen...
 
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO Data
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO DataApproaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO Data
Approaches to Populating the Sponsor CTMS with CRO Data
 
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or Fiction
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or FictionCloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or Fiction
Cloud Clinical Trial Management Systems: Fact or Fiction
 
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?
What can Oracle Clinical Development Analytics (CDA) do for you?
 

CBI's 4th Annual Forum on Clinical Trial Management Systems (CTMS)

  • 1. R e g i s t e r b y J a n u a r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 1 a n d R e c e i v e $ 3 0 0 O f f o f Yo u r R e g i s t r a t i o n F e e ! CBi’s 4th annual forum on Clinical Trial Management Systems (CTMS) Adoption, Integration and Management Solutions to Maximize the Value of Investments March 24-25, 2011 • crowne Plaza • PhiladelPhia, Pa Balanced perspectives ConferenCe Chairperson: Leverage CTMS to enable strategic regarding various types of CTMS Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, clinical operational efficiencies systems Oracle Health Sciences Analyze criteria used to make a CTMS selection fDa aDDress: “Understand Potential Regulatory Learn the benefits and challenges of co-developing a Issues and Inspection Expectations” Jonathan S. Helfgott, Consumer Safety Officer, CTMS with a CRO versus purchasing an application CDRH’s Division of Bioresearch Monitoring, Food and Drug Administration Understand resource requirements for data migration resulting from a merger of two separate systems national CanCer institute aDDress Manage shared CTMS data between sponsor and CRO “NCI Update on the (caBIG ) Initiative” ® David Loose, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Adapt CTMS to incorporate payment structure shifts Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT) Bill Dyer, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) through Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT) CTMS simplification aCaDemiC meDiCal Choose Between Two Pre-Conference Workshops — Thursday, March 24, 2011 Center aDDress: “A Site-Based Approach to CTMS” A. Increase ROI B. Build Organizational Anthony Leiro, Manager, Business Architecture, Information Technology, Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) through an Bridges for Cross-Functional Effective CTMS Collaboration and Case stuDies anD Training Program Decision-Making perspeCtives from: BioPharm Systems • DSP Clinical Research Presenting Lead Media Partner: Sponsor: Ferring International PharmaScience Centre Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group Artwork by: Getty Images GlaxoSmithKline • Merck & Co., Inc. Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company Organized by: Lead Media Partner: Perceptive Informatics • Quintiles sanofi-aventis • Sanofi Pasteur • Target Health A Subsidiary of For more information, please visit us on the web at www.cbinet.com/ctms
  • 2. Choose f rom Two Pre-Conference Work shops – Thursday, Ma rch 24, 2011 7:30 Workshop Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 • Workshop A 8:30 • Workshop B Build Organizational Bridges Increase ROI through an Effective for Cross-Functional Collaboration and CTMS Training Program Decision-Making Workshop Objective: Workshop Objective: User adoption is the key to achieving a rapid ROI for CTMS systems are utilized by many key stakeholders, both internal your CTMS and the key to user adoption is an effective and external to the organization. There are individuals that make training program. Such training programs are based on decisions regarding the system; those that support the system; and a careful analysis of an organization’s culture and the those that use the system. It is important to realize that decisions characteristics of its end-users. All training programs regarding CTMS impact all key stakeholders and therefore should be multi-faceted, comprehensive and long-term in processes for collaboration are critical. This workshop covers scope. But, depending on the organization, the details of a cross-organization collaboration and decision-making while also program can be tailored to meet the needs of the end-users focusing on the relationship with CROs, between the business and and the organization as a whole. Effective CTMS training technical teams as well as key end-users. programs leave users feeling well-equipped to begin using Key Questions to Be Addressed: the system and fully supported as they master it. This workshop presents a variety of methods for achieving these • Who should be involved in a cross-functional advisory committee? goals and discusses how to choose from these methods to • What is the impact of CTMS changes on other clinical systems? build a training program that is right for your organization. • How is a stronger relationship between business and technical teams created? Key Questions to Be Addressed: • How is feedback from end-users incorporated into the decision-making process? • How do adults learn? Workshop Outline: • What are the different approaches to software training? • Which approaches make sense in different types I. Ensure Cross-Functional Decision-Making for of organizations? CTMS Systems • How can we best prepare users to start using the system? • Understand business priorities and current • How can we continue to support users over time? decision-making structure • Create a cross-functional key stakeholder advisory Workshop Outline: committee to address questions * level of access granted to CROs and other business I. Understand How Adults Learn partners that comply with privacy regulations • Motivating them to learn • Make key decisions for CTMS initiatives • Helping them retain what they learn * business process changes impacting initiatives timeline changes • Helping them apply what they learn • Implement a Change Control Board (CCB) II. Analyze Your CTMS User Group * evaluate changes to system itself, both business and technical • Organizational culture * determine impact of CTMS changes on other clinical systems • Number and types of users II. Create Stronger Relationship between Technical • Location of users Operations and Business • Understand change requests from business III. Develop Your Training Program/Strategy • Evaluate issues impacting systems • Short-term — Initial rollout • Eliminate technical and business silos • Medium-term — Reference materials and refreshers III. End-User Forums to Provide Consistent Feedback • Long-term — • Grass-roots forum where users can voice concerns, challenges Clear and effective support structure • Discuss best practices • Hear lessons learned to date 12:00 Close of Workshop A 12:00 Close of Workshop B There will be a 30-minute networking and refreshment break at 10:00 a.m. There will be a 30-minute networking and refreshment break at 10:00 a.m. Workshop Leaders: Workshop Leader: Parambir Singh, Vice President, BioPharm Systems, Inc Amy Black, Global Business Program Manager, Shannon L. Beebe, Siebel Coordinator, Covidien Genentech – A Member of the Roche Group
  • 3. MAIN CONFERENCE National Cancer Institute Address 3:30 NCI Update on the (caBIG®) Initiative Day One — Thursday, March 24, 2011 The cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG®) initiative, overseen by the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH), National 12:00 Main Conference Registration Cancer Institute (NCI) Center for Biomedical Informatics and 1:15 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks Information Technology (CBIIT), was conceived to connect the Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences cancer research and clinical community through a semantically- Ms. Travers has over twenty years experience in Clinical Research working aware service-based, open-source, interoperable technology in both industry and CRO environments. Her experience includes Data that facilitates data sharing and collaboration to accelerate management, Clinical Monitoring, EDC, IVRS and Medical Imaging. the translation of discoveries from research to clinical care. Prior to joining Oracle, she was at Vertex Pharmaceuticals where she led The caBIG® Clinical Trials Management Systems Workspace strategy and implementation of Clinical Development Systems. She was also provides modular caBIG® software tools designed to meet at Perceptive Informatics (a Parexel International Company) where she led diverse clinical trials management needs. caBIG® tools are efforts around IVRS, EDC and Medical Imaging. configurable to work with clinical sites with little or no clinical data management systems in place, as well as those with robust Keynote Address systems; and take into account the diversity of clinical research activities as well as local practices that exist among clinical sites. 1:30 Leverage CTMS as a Powerful Decision-Supporting Engine This address discusses the goals and progress of this initiative, Most companies today either have a CTMS or are considering as well as plans for the future. using one to manage the day-to-day activities of their trials. • Hear about the goals of the caBIG® initiative and the As the industry evolves, all the systems used to support clinical NCI vision of interoperability development must evolve as well, including CTMS systems. • Understand challenges and successes to date in This keynote address analyzes the potential evolution of these systems and offers insight into ways to ensure the CTMS enables deployment of the caBIG® Clinical Trials Suite and the decisions critical to supporting future clinical trials. NCI Enterprise Services • Discuss how CTMS can enable the next set of clinical • Learn the next steps with the caBIG® initiative and operational efficiencies the NCI’s plans for restructuring of the NCI Clinical IT Enterprise • Transform CTMS for the future David Loose, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Simon Brooks, Product Champion, Integrated Clinical Research Suite, Oracle Health Sciences Information Technology (CBIIT) Bill Dyer, Contractor, NCI Center for Biomedical Informatics and Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences Information Technology (CBIIT) FDA Address Academic Medical Center Address 2:15 Understand Potential Regulatory Issues and 4:15 A Site-Based Approach to CTMS Inspection Expectations Clinical sites utilize CTMS systems to record data for clinical CTMS systems can offer operational efficiencies for the trials specific to the study site, not aggregated multi-site study data organization. However, understanding how the data needs to as in most sponsor-led trials. In that way, a disconnect exists in be handled to comply with the FDA as well as what to expect how the information is entered and reported between the clinical during an inspection is critical. This applies to any CTMS site and sponsor. This leads to challenges when sharing data in system. This address discusses the regulatory challenges and study collaborations with sponsors because it requires sites to expectations during an FDA inspection. Attendees are then manage their portfolio of research projects independent of the invited to participate in a Q&A session with the FDA. sponsor. Over the last three years, Duke University has deployed • Potential FDA regulatory issues when using CTMS a site-based CTMS in conducting trials. The CTMS is being systems and its impact on FDA used for over 3,000 different clinical trials and tracking the study * regulated clinical research activities visits of more than 60,000 study participants. The trials that * marketing applications use CTMS range from small single-site research studies to large * inspections multi-site trials. This site-based approach to CTMS provides the site with tools to improve coordination of patient visits, capacity • Hear case examples from the FDA planning, billing integration, resource utilization, financial and • Examine developing trends in clinical systems regulatory compliance as well as managerial reporting. This * merging eClinical systems address discusses the site-based approach to CTMS and the (i.e. EDC/CTMS/CDMS/IVRS) interrelationship with sponsors. * use of EHRs • Hear an overview of Duke’s site-based approach * home healthcare in clinical research to CTMS * clinical data standards • Explore the disconnect between sites and sponsors • Participate in an open discussion with FDA with data from CTMS Jonathan S. Helfgott, Consumer Safety Officer, CDRH’s Division of • Analyze the capabilities of the CTMS and future Bioresearch Monitoring, Food and Drug Administration plans for enhancements Anthony Leiro, Manager, Business Architecture, Information Technology, 3:00 Networking and Refreshment Break Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI)
  • 4. Considerations for CTMS Selection and Adoption CTMS System Implementation Strategies 5:00 Leverage Interoperability of the CTMS as the 9:00 Leveraging Implementation Experience from eClinical Backbone for All Key Stakeholders Different Business Units for Smoother Transition Managing programs and studies with configurable sanofi-aventis (SA) has been using a CTMS since the mid- off-the-shelf software is a challenge. Those involved in 1990’s. However, Sanofi Pasteur (SP), its vaccine division, has running a trial include the sponsor, contract research only been using a CTMS since 2000. The SA implementation organizations, ethics committees, local and central laboratories and the investigative sites and patients themselves. All of had its challenges. In learning from them, SP has taken a these users have their own needs — their own specific tasks to more cautious roll-out approach and has changed a few of be recorded in, or guided by, ‘their’ software….ePRO, EDC, the processes involved with the implementation. To date, IVR, etc. So, can we even conceive one “master system” to the implementation has gone much smoother and has started coordinate milestones and data? This presentation shows with the capabilities of tracking milestones, written monitor how a CTMS can be considered a ‘backbone’ for the entire visits and developing clinical reporting. Future plans include eClinical framework. Interoperability of a CTMS is interfacing with clinical eDoc and EDC as well as integrating discussed including: with finance. This case study compares and contracts the • User workflow CTMS roll-outs of SA and SP, highlighting specific changes • Dashboards in process that SP adopted as lessons learned. Also to be • Intuitive use of a CTMS discussed are future plans for the CTMS. • Notifications to various users • Examine the CTMS implementations • Tying data together of both SA and SP John Humphreys, CTMS Product Director, Perceptive Informatics • Analyze the changes made to ensure a smoother 5:45 Close of Day One CASE implementation for SP STUDy • Hear future plans for SP CTMS Daniel O’Connell, Manager of Monitoring Systems, Clinical Study Unit, 5:45-6:45 Networking, North America, sanofi-aventis Wine & Cheese Reception William Dubost, Manager of Monitoring Systems, Sanofi Pasteur Join colleagues and friends in a relaxed setting. Parambir Singh, Vice President, BioPharm Systems, Inc. Photo by: Photolink / Getty Images P 9:45 Customization of CTMS in an Outsourced Model Day Two — Friday, March 25, 2011 A This panel discussion offers a look at Millennium’s customization N of CTMS to support their study management needs, including the 7:30 Continental Breakfast development of data migration and data integration components. E As Millennium’s sourcing model changed during the 8:00 Chairperson’s Review of Day One L implementation of the tool, analysis of the impact on the system Karen Travers, Director, Product Strategy, Oracle Health Sciences requirements and business processes are also explored. 8:15 Analysis of the Decision Whether to Co-Develop a Moderator: Heather Wolff, Associate Director, Data Operations, CTMS with an eCRO or to Buy an Existing Application Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company Ferring is a mid-sized pharmaceutical company specializing Panelists: David Roberts, Associate Director, Informatics, in treating diseases mainly through peptide/protein pathways Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company and initiates about fifteen new phase I-III studies annually. Joe Coady, Lead Clinical Systems Developer, Ferring’s fourteen-year collaboration with Target Health has Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company resulted in four NDA/MAA and other country approvals. Kevin Lloyd, Director, Clinical Business Operations, In 2008, Target Health had co-developed a CTMS with an Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company international CRO. The advantages of that collaboration are that there was a deep understanding of clinical research 10:30 Networking and Refreshment Break operations as well the needs of pharmaceutical companies, clinical research sites and regulators. Having outgrown its 11:00 Data Migration through M&A for Global System homemade CTMS, Ferring evaluated several CTMS vendors who would provide and/or build a suitable replacement. Implementation and Deployment This option was attractive because these systems require In 2009 Schering-Plough (SP) and Merck merged to diversify a lot of resources, both to implement and maintain; and its product portfolio and result in a stronger market position. Ferring was not in the software development business. Before the merger, SP and Merck utilized different CTMS The system had to be user-friendly, flexible and easier to systems. A decision had to be made on which system to use interface with their EDC system. This case study analyzes and then data had to be migrated to the chosen system. that decision process, covers progress to date and offers insight This case study covers this process, highlighting key decision into challenges and future plans. points with regards to data migration and roll-out approach as • Maintain flexibility of the system well as discusses challenges faced throughout the process. • Develop a growth plan as the company matures • Understand the resource requirements of the data • Understand the risks involved with co-developing migration and user training a system with a CRO versus an established CASE • Analyze the process of Merck’s roll-out decision STUDy CTMS vendor CASE Jules Mitchel, President, Target Health STUDy • Learn future plans for CTMS capabilities Silvana Cappi, MSc., MBA Executive Director, Biometrics, Mark Hill, Executive Director, Clinical Trial Operations, Merck & Co., Inc. Ferring International PharmaScience Centre Chris Heider, Director, IT, Merck & Co., Inc.
  • 5. “Very important forum to see what the industry is doing.” — 2010 Attendee, Rob Stackhouse, Associate Business Systems Director, R&D Architecture, Shire Pharmaceuticals Effectively Manage CTMS Post-Implementation cost of ownership (TCO) of the system be reduced without compromising data quality, while increasing productivity? 11:45 Analyze the Management of Shared CTMS Data This case study discusses the wider initiative within GSK between Sponsor and CRO regarding its clinical systems and steps taken towards As a function of the outsourcing relationship, sponsors simplification of the CTMS. off-load components of the clinical development process • Overview of the history of GSK’s CTMS to CROs such as patient recruitment and site management, • Hear goals of the corporate-wide initiative regulatory/submission management, etc. Inevitably, as a part of this relationship, decisions regarding where and • Learn the results to date on lowering TCO CASE through simplification how the data is to be managed must be made. When the STUDy data is collected and managed using CRO systems, often Anthony Cavallo, Director, Operational Data Acquisition Support Services, the sponsor needs the data to maintain in-house clinical ISS, CCSE, GlaxoSmithKline development which is not outsourced. This data component can be defined within a broader services contract or in some 3:15 Close of Conference cases a contract is developed to specifically outline these requirements. This case study outlines the export of data to the sponsor to enable a distributed operational partnership. Best practices for managing this process are discussed. In RecognItIon of ouR SponSoRS: • Analyze various types of data export • Design the data model CBI Research, Inc’s corporate sponsors represent select • Ensure data transport protection companies that share a common mission: business advancement • Examine the benefits and pitfalls of this process through thought leadership, strategic interaction and innovation. CASE The companies represented below are proud contributors on this STUDy • Discuss where the industry is headed program and have carefully selected messaging, branding or Steven W. Leypoldt, Associate Director, Business Analysis, IT, Quintiles positioning statements to encourage the evaluation and investigation 12:30 Luncheon of quality products and/or services available. We applaud these companies, as well as others that wish to join the conference, 1:45 Customizing a CTMS to Adapt to Changing Needs as important members of this event’s delegation. In 2006, DSP Clinical Research worked with a vendor to create a custom CTMS to meet their needs. Over the past About Our Presenting Sponsor: four years, the CTMS had to be adapted on a continual basis to meet the evolving needs of the organization. Payment structure to sponsors changed from hourly to fixed-rate. DSP implemented internal management processes to retain control of the CTMS to better customize CTMS features. A strategy was developed to ensure excellent customer service from Oracle is a leading strategic software solutions provider the vendor. Although the system works efficiently, there to the health sciences industry. Oracle Health Sciences have been challenges along the way and to date it still has its helps pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and limitations. This case study discusses the process from the healthcare organizations become the most successful in the initial implementation through its adaptations. Challenges, world by offering the most innovative products and services solutions and current limitations are also presented. that deliver the most compelling customer and shareholder • Examine the initial collaboration between DSP and value. Addressing industry requirements, Oracle provides its CTMS vendor comprehensive solutions including clinical trial management • Analyze the adaptations made to the system and analysis, electronic data capture, adverse event reporting CASE STUDy • Discuss benefits, challenges and current limitations and pharmacovigilance and healthcare interoperability. Brenda Reese, Vice President of Business Operations, Oracle partners with health sciences industry leaders to DSP Clinical Research prevent and cure disease and enhance quality of life and accelerate insights for better health. 2:30 Customization versus Simplification — Getting Back to Basics to Lower TCO Over the years, GSK has customized many facets of their Additional Sponsors: CTMS system based on the needs of different therapeutic areas, business areas, etc. Although customizations prove to be useful, they are both expensive to support and can present challenges in upgrading to newer versions. GSK decided to simplify its CTMS, or get back to basics. Can the same processes be supported using core system If you are interested in sponsorship or exhibit opportunities, functionality? What level of customization is necessary please call Alexa Moore at 339-298-2107 or email alexa.moore@cbinet.com versus configuration of the base product? Can the total To Register Call Toll Free 800-817-8601 (339-298-2100 outside the U.S.) or Fax 781-939-2490. Register on our website at www.cbinet.com/ctms
  • 6. R e g i s t e r b y J a n u a r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 1 a n d R e c e i v e $ 3 0 0 O f f o f Yo u r R e g i s t r a t i o n F e e ! • Utilize CTMS as the sole “master system” CBi’s 4th annual forum on to coordinate milestones and data • Examine implementation changes resulting from Clinical Trial Management experience with one business unit to another • Understand the benefits of a site-based approach Systems (CTMS) to CTMS • Benchmark against other industry professionals with peer-to-peer networking Adoption, Integration and Management Solutions PlUS! Choose from Two Pre-Conference to Maximize the Value of Investments Workshops — Thursday, March 24, 2011 A. Increase ROI B. Build Organizational through an Bridges for Cross-Functional March 24-25, 2011 • crowne Plaza Effective CTMS Collaboration and philaDelphia, pa Training Program Decision-Making The Next Best Thing to Being There… CBI PRSRT STD 600 Unicorn Park Drive • Woburn, MA 01801 U.S. Postage Order the Online Compendium if you would like to capture what you’ve missed PAID at the conference. It couldn’t be easier. The link to the online compendium is Gallery available for only $198 and includes the conference agenda, presentations and speakers’ biographies. Don’t miss out on this valuable information presented by industry leaders exclusively at this event. Simply fill out the order form and submit via phone, fax or website and you’ll receive the link to the Online Compendium within 2 weeks after the conference. • Registration Fee: Standard Advantage Pricing Conference & Workshop $2,095 $1,795 Conference only $1,795 $1,495 Advantage Pricing — Register by January 21, 2011, 2010 and SAVE $300. Fee includes continental breakfast, lunch, wine and cheese reception, refreshments and Online Compendium. Please make checks (in U.S. funds drawn on a U.S. bank) registration Card DO NOT REMOVE MAILING LABEL. PLEASE RETURN ENTIRE FORM. PC11134 payable to CBI Research, Inc. (No personal checks accepted) Advantage Pricing may not be combined with other discount offers, special category rates or promotions. Yes! Please register me for CBI’s 4th Annual Forum on Clinical Trial Management Systems (CTMS). Discounts only apply to standard rates. • Team Discount: Conference & Workshop A Conference & Workshop B Conference only Your organization may send 1 executive free for every 3 delegates registered. I am registering for ADVANTAGE PRICING We would like to take advantage of the TEAM DISCOUNT (see left for details). All registrations must be made at the same time to qualify. • Accommodations: Yes! Please send me the link to the Online Compendium. I am unable to attend the conference. To receive CBI’s special discounted hotel rate on line or by phone, please go to: Register 3 • On-line: www.cbinet.com/CTMS Do you have any special needs? ________________________________________________ Get 1 FREE • Phone reservations: 888.233.9527 and mention CBI’s CTMS Conference. KEY CODE (appears above mailing address): ___________________________________ Cut-off date is March 9, 2011. Reservations made after the cut-off date or after group room block has been filled (whichever comes first) will be accepted 1. NAME POSITION on a space and rate availability basis. Rooms are limited so please book early. All travel arrangements are subject to availability. 2. NAME POSITION • Venue: 3. NAME POSITION Crowne Plaza 1800 Market Street • Philadelphia, PA 19103 4. NAME POSITION Hotel reservations: 888.233.9527 Free Hotel direct line: 215.561.7500 COMPANY DIVISION • Substitution & Cancellation: ADDRESS Your registration may be transferred to a member of your organization up to 24 hours in advance of the conference. Cancellations received in writing on or before 14 days CITY STATE/COUNTRY ZIP/POSTAL CODE prior to the start date of the event will be refunded, less a $195 administrative charge. No refunds will be made after this date; however, the registration fee less the $195 TELEPHONE FAx E-MAIL administrative charge can be credited to another CBI conference if you register within 30 days from the date of this conference to an alternative CBI conference scheduled AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE within the next six months. In case of conference cancellation, CBI’s liability is limited to refund of the conference registration fee only. CBI reserves the right to alter this program Payment Options: Payment in full is required to process registration. Please call with any payment questions. without prior notice. Please Note: Speakers and agenda are subject to change. In the event of a speaker cancellation, every effort to find a suitable replacement will be made Enclosed is a check for payment in full (No personal checks accepted) Please without notice. The opinions of the conference faculty do not necessarily reflect those of photocopy the companies they represent or The Center for Business Intelligence. MC/Visa: this form for additional • Satisfaction Guaranteed: Amex: delegates. CBI stands behind the quality of its conferences. If you are not satisfied with the quality of the conference, a credit will be awarded towards a comparable NAME (AS APPEARS ON CARD) ExP. DATE CBI conference of your choice. Please contact 800-817-8601 for further information. CARDHOLDER SIGNATURE Advanced preparation for CBI conferences is not required. WeBSiTe Phone fAX e-MAil MAil 5 Easy Ways www.cbinet.com/ CTMS 800-817-8601 781-939-2490 cbireg@cbinet.com CBI Registration Dept. 339-298-2100 Please include all information 600 Unicorn Park Drive to REgistER outside the U.S. requested on registration card. Woburn, MA 01801