SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 73
The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Estimated number of publications  in the last three decades    40’000
The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Estimated number of publications  in the last three decades    40’000 Cognitive science fields involved in research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy Computer sciences Psychology Psychoanalysis
The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences                                  conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis The Brain functions metaphorically
The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences                                   conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis Reasons for increasing importance: The Brain functions metaphorically
The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences                                   conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis Reasons for increasing importance: Increasing interdisciplinary work regarding the understanding of the mind Driven by computer sciences’ attempts to emulate the functioning of the mind : knowledge  harvesting rather than data collecting The Brain functions metaphorically
Main task addressed in this presentation Assuming   that  Psychoanalysis  is  central  to understanding  the  mind’s  functioning  The  mind  works  metaphorically
TASK How  do  we  revise  psychoanalytic  theory  from  a  metaphoric  point  of  view  without  sacrificing  its  essential  achievements ?
PSYCHODYNAMICS current central concepts Transference Defense Interpretation Suggested  central concepts Time Metaphor Transference Defense Interpretation organizing
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toa present/past past/present
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor Interpretation Transference
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2)  Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation Transference
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2)  Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretationinto Transference into Defenseinto Interpretation Transference
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2)  Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation   into  Temporal Metaphor = present/past Transference intoTemporal Metaphor =past/present Defense     into   Temporal Metaphor = Interpretation Transference
In  view  of  the  importance  of TIME 1)  Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2)  Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation   into  Temporal Metaphor = present/past Transference intoTemporal Metaphor =past/present Defense     into   Temporal Metaphor = Interpretation Transference
Explanation  of  terms  used  in  this presentation Terms   Used ‘The present’ ‘The past’ to  express Present mentation or experience Past mentationorexperience
Explanation  of  terms  used  in  this presentation  Terms Referring  to   = “Defense Complex” Defending partof defense Defended against  part of defense
Explanation  of  terms  used  in  this presentation  Terms Referring  to   = “Defense Complex” Or  shortened: Defending  part of defense Defended against  part of defense
Explanation  of  terms  used  in  this presentation  Terms Referring  to = “Defense” Defending  part of defense Defended against  part of defense
How  the  terms  are  used  in  this presentation   term ‘Transference’ ‘Interpretation’ Temporal  Sense    given   here Interpretation of the present by the past Interpretation of the past by the present
The definition of metaphor Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains
The definition of metonymy Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equated entities (source and target) located in the samedomains
The definition of metaphor Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains “Juliet is the sun” (domains: humans+ celestial bodies)
Metaphor  =  “ in terms of ” Phrase indicating a  metaphor  : “ in  terms  of ” “Juliet is seen in  terms  of   the sun” “Life is seen in  terms  of   a journey”
The definition and examples of metonymy Metonymy is an equation of two entities located in the same domain “The liver goes to operating room 3” “All hands on board” “He drank the bottle” Phrases indicating a metonymy:  “stands for”, “belongs to”, “is part of”
Phrases connecting source and target indicating metaphor or metonymy METAPHOR “in terms of” “Juliet seen in terms of the sun” “Life understood in terms of a journey” Metonymy “stands for”,  “belongs to”,  “is part of” The liver belongs to patient going to operating room 3 All hands stands for sailors to go on board He drank the bottle = wine as part of the bottle
Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal  concepts of metaphor
Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal  concepts of metaphor Linguistics:  Linguistic metaphor,  BASED ON LANGUAGE Cognitive sciences:  Conceptual metaphor,                                    BASED ON THOUGHT Psychoanalysis:  Temporal metaphor,  BASED ON TIME
Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal  concepts of metaphor Conceptual: Metaphor  is an equation of thought entities rather than language entities.    THOUGHT  NOT  LANGUAGE Example: “The New Testament relates metaphorically to the Old Testament:  Christ’s death and resurrection relates metaphorically to the original sin and its forgiveness”
Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal  concepts of metaphor Temporal: Regardless  of  content  and  use   the  quality of the temporal relationship  isintrinsicallymetaphorical in the optimal functioning Mind: The present is the same and not the same as the past. We understand them in terms of each othe  TIMENOTTHOUGHT NOR  LANGUAGE Example: Today is informed by yesterday: it is the same and not the same; one can be understood (in an underdetermined way) in terms of the other.
Examples of linguistic, conceptual, and temporal  concepts of metaphor Linguistic: LANGUAGE Conceptual: USE OF  THOUGHT  NOT  LANGUAGE Temporal: TIME NOT LANGUAGE  OR  THOUGHT Life is a journey Christ’s death is metaphorically related  to the original sin Adulthood understood in terms of childhood
Neurosis Trauma leads to a loss of metaphoricity.  As a consequence past and present relaterigidly (metonymically) to each other rather than informing each other. Neurotic defense  (the present) comes metonymically to stand for the defended against (the past). The past evokes a rigid defense, thus over-determining the present rather than just informing it
Phrases connecting source and target indicating metaphor or metonymy Metaphor = source/target interacting Metonymy= source/target not interacting Healthy Defense Neurotic Defense “stands for”  past and present rigidly  standing for each other  “in terms of” past and present interact  in terms of each other
Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting?   general psychology? treatment   setting Transference Interpretation Defense  general   psychology Could   these  psychodynamic   phenomena  belong   to  the  mind’s   normal  functioning ?
Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting?   general psychology? Treatment  setting Transference  from analysand to analyst as  ongoing interpretation of  the  present by  the past general   psychology Transference intrapsychic as  ongoing interpretation of  the  present by  the past
Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting?   general psychology? treatment   setting Interpretation by the analyst      interpreting the past  from and by  the present general   psychology Interpretation  intrapsychic       interpreting the past from and by the present
Psychodynamic concepts relevant inthe treatment setting   in general psychology Treatment   setting Defense:       interpretation of  intrapsychictransference Defense  (as defending and defended against) Interpretation of transference general   psychology
Psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting ?  general psychology ? treatment  Transference  Interpretation Defense general   psychology Intrapsychic      Transference Intrapsychic Interpretation  Intrapsychic      Defense O n g o i n g   d y n a m i c s
Psychoanalytic Practice versus Theory Practice We  understand  the present  transference in  terms of  the past we  understand  the  pastin  terms of the  present transference Theory This  central  part  of psychoanalytic   practice Is  not  sufficiently integrated  by  its  theory
Moving from content to time Language and Thought Content –centered domains Metaphor is a an equation of two conventionally not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains Time-centered domains In psychoanalysis the intrinsically different domains of metaphor are temporal ones: e.g., past and present
Functions  of  linguistic  and  temporal metaphors Influencing Informing Modeling and Searching Interpreting Actualizing Changing Familiarizing Forming new category Keeping at bay  (new category organization from old category organization)
Psychoanalytic  concepts  viewed from  a  temporal  point  of  view Present  to  past Defending part of defense Interpreting Insight (updating) Curing Repression Remembering Regressing Past  to  present Defended part of defense Transference Insight (actualizing) Childhood neurosis Return of the repressed Memories Fixation
Aspects of all  temporal metaphors  suggesting their synonymity Influencing Informing Modeling and Searching Interpreting Actualizing Changing Familiarizing Forming new category Keeping at bay  (new category organization from old category organization)
Psychoanalytic  terms  viewed as potential synonyms regarding their temporal function Potential synonyms (Present  to  past) Defending part of defense Interpreting Insight (updating) Curing Repression Remembering Regressing Potential synonyms (past to present) Defended part of defense Transference Insight (actualizing) Childhood neurosis Return of the repressed Memories Fixation
Corresponding aspects between linguistic and temporal metaphors  Linguistic Interpretingof one domain by another domain.( Life is a journey) Transferringaspects of the source to the target  Maintaining  tension, holding source  at  bay  from  the target  while  still  relating  to it Temporal Interpretingof one temporal domain by another temporal domain.  Transferring: aspects of the past (source) transferred to the present (target) Maintaining  tension, holding past  as source at  bay  from the  present as target while  remembering the former
Aspects of temporal metaphors  as used by psychoanalytic terms Temporal Metaphors Psychoanalytic  TERM Interpretingof one temporal domain by another temporal domain.  Transferring: aspects of the past (source) transferred to the present (target) Maintaining  tension, holding past  at  bay  from the  present while  remembering it ‘INTERPRETATION’. Interpretationof past  by     present. ‘TRANSFERENCE’ Interpretation of present by past . ‘DEFENSE’  (as the defending part of defense) The holding at bay of previous organizations of issues  while remembering them.
Synonymous functions of  psychodynamic concepts regarding their functioning in time Highlight synonymous functions of our psychodynamic concepts even though differing in temporal direction of influence InterpretationTemporal Metaphor =present/past Transference Temporal Metaphor = past/present DefenseTemporal Metaphor = present/past + past/present
Aspects of temporal metaphors Therefore Interpreting  Transferring Defending Are all functions of all temporal metaphors. This establishes the basic synonymity between the psychodynamic concepts transference, interpretation, and defense
Healthy and neurotic forms of  temporal metaphors HALTHY  =  METAPHOR Neurotic  =  metonymy Past  and  Present INFORM  each  other  like  source  and  target  of  a metaphor Past  and  present DETERMINE   each  other  like  source and  target  of  a   metonymy
Healthy and neurotic forms of  temporal metaphors Metaphor   informs Metonymy  stands  for =   determines INTERPRETATION      informs  past TRANSFERENCE      informs  present DEFENSE      Defending  and  defended  against  inform  each other INTERPRETATION       Does  not  inform  past thus determines it  as  immutable TRANSFERENCE       Does  not   inform   but  determines   present  as  repetition DEFENSE       Defending  and  defended   against  can not  inform   but determine   each  other  by  standing  for  each  other
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? Symptom – centered  view Transference Defense Interpretation No generalization to dynamic psychology of the mind outside treatment setting Psychoanalysis has little standing in academia Temporal  Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Generalization from treatment to general psychology becomes possible Chance to improve academic standing
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? symptom - centered Psychodynamic terms centered on treatment setting Transference and interpretation are phenomena, in the main,  reserved for the treatment setting Centered – on  General psychological functioning   Psychodynamic terms centered on general psychological functioning Transference and interpretation seen as part of general psychological functioning, including in the treatment setting
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? Conventional view Transference Defense Interpretation Time implicitly and not centrally integrated in theory Temporal  Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Time explicitly and centrally integrated in theory
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? Conventional view Transference Defense Interpretation Not primarily defined in terms of relations between the present and the past Temporal  Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Primarily defined in terms of relations between the present and the past
The three main psychodynamic concepts transference, defense, interpretation Conventional view Transference Interpretation Not extended beyond treatment setting Temporal  Metaphor-centered view Transference Interpretation Extended beyond treatment setting as Intrapsychic  transference Intrapsychic interpretation
The three main psychodynamic concepts transference, defense, interpretation Conventional view Transference Neurotic enactment of past unconscious conflicts transferred to the analyst and experienced in terms of a now relevant relationship Temporal   Metaphor-centered  view Intrapsychic transference Ongoing interpretation of the present by the past, in and outside the treatment setting – neurotic or healthy, conscious or unconscious
Psychodynamic concepts relevant for general psychology treatment setting Transference  (from analysand to analyst) Intrapsychic - Transference  as ongoing interpretation of present by the past
Summary Transference Observed in the treatment setting  Interpretation Carried out by the analyst Defense Healthy: “Sublimation” Neurotic: Mentation used to bar unconscious conflicts from becoming conscious general  psychology  treatment  setting Transference Ubiquitous  phenomenon in and outside the treatment setting Interpretation Carried out by the mind in an ongoing way as a reinterpretation of the past  Defense Healthy: Present and past  interpret each other Neurotic: When the present can not interpret  the past the analysts interpretation  is needed
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? Conventional view Temporal  Metaphor- centered view Transference Defense Interpretation These concepts  are related not only functionally but more closely as aspects of each other Transference Defense Interpretation These concepts  are  only  functionally related to each other
The quality of the temporal relationship Healthy  past  present  relationships  are  of metaphorical quality Neurotic  past  present  relationships  are  of  metonymical quality Transference Determining  present Defense        The defending part         stands for        the defended-against part.          No mutual informing possible. Interpretation       intrapsychic interpretation can not reach the unknown (repressed) past. The analyst’s interpretation is needed Transference        Informing present Defense        The defending part  and the defended against part  inform each other in an ongoing way Interpretation       The present updates and thus changes the narrative influence the past has on the present
Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic  psychology ? Temporal  Metaphor-centered treatment Analyst’s interpretation Interpretation is metaphorizing lost metaphoricity Temporal  Metaphor-centered general functioning Intrapsychic interpretation Interpretation is metaphorizing lost metaphoricity
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretsmetaphorically the past  = Interpretation  The past interprets metaphorically the present =Transference
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: = Interpretation =Transference
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: = Interpretation of =Transference
Structure of healthy defense SUMMARY: = Interpretation              of Transference
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretation of thepast The past interprets metaphorically the present
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretation of thepast The past interprets metaphorically the present
Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice.  The present transference  is understood in terms ofpast experience;  the past is understood in terms of  present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretsmetaphorically the past  = Interpretation  The past interprets metaphorically the present =Transference
Structure of healthy defense The past informs metaphorically the present The present interprets metaphorically the past
Defense is Interpretation of Transference Metaphor and Metonymy Defense, Interpretation, and Transference are all Temporal Metaphors (when functioning optimally) or Temporal Metonymies (when functioning sub-optimally) Suggested Theoretical Integration Summary and Outlook
First and second order temporal metaphors First order First order Second order
Scaling of fractal hierarchy of              temporal metaphors
Defending part Defended against part PRESENT AGENCIES  AT WAR PAST

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Metaphor-based psychoanalysis

Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse AnalysisTheoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse AnalysisLouis de Saussure
 
Mind Force 2008
Mind Force 2008Mind Force 2008
Mind Force 2008forsucci
 
the role of workiing memory.....pptx
the role of workiing memory.....pptxthe role of workiing memory.....pptx
the role of workiing memory.....pptxMaya
 
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case Method
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case MethodIIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case Method
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case MethodShiva Kumar Srinivasan
 
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_finalDr. Allen Siegel
 
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneutic
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneuticApplebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneutic
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneuticMarc Applebaum, PhD
 
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...Claudia Brown
 
Semantic discourse analysis
Semantic discourse analysisSemantic discourse analysis
Semantic discourse analysisblessedkkr
 
51662 chapter 7_
51662 chapter 7_51662 chapter 7_
51662 chapter 7_Rachel Niu
 
semantics ppt 2.pptx
semantics ppt 2.pptxsemantics ppt 2.pptx
semantics ppt 2.pptxMaya
 
Inferenece and Anticipation in SI
Inferenece and Anticipation in SIInferenece and Anticipation in SI
Inferenece and Anticipation in SIRock Niu
 
Animal Thought And Talk.6
Animal Thought And Talk.6Animal Thought And Talk.6
Animal Thought And Talk.6Ralphgar
 
Week 1.2 learning and using new words
Week 1.2 learning and using new wordsWeek 1.2 learning and using new words
Week 1.2 learning and using new wordsDr. Russell Rodrigo
 
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdf
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdfDharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdf
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdfarmandotesar1
 
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory Ruth M. Kempson 1977
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory  Ruth M. Kempson 19772.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory  Ruth M. Kempson 1977
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory Ruth M. Kempson 1977Amer Al Amery
 

Similar a Metaphor-based psychoanalysis (20)

Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse AnalysisTheoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
Theoretical Issues In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
 
Mind Force 2008
Mind Force 2008Mind Force 2008
Mind Force 2008
 
the role of workiing memory.....pptx
the role of workiing memory.....pptxthe role of workiing memory.....pptx
the role of workiing memory.....pptx
 
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case Method
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case MethodIIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case Method
IIMK Working Paper on Time & the Case Method
 
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final
4df93b3773827 @!@ optimal_conversation_short_version_final
 
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneutic
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneuticApplebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneutic
Applebaum phenomenology descriptive and hermeneutic
 
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...
Differences Between Informal Logic, And Theoretical...
 
Semantic discourse analysis
Semantic discourse analysisSemantic discourse analysis
Semantic discourse analysis
 
51662 chapter 7_
51662 chapter 7_51662 chapter 7_
51662 chapter 7_
 
semantics ppt 2.pptx
semantics ppt 2.pptxsemantics ppt 2.pptx
semantics ppt 2.pptx
 
What is a theory
What is a theoryWhat is a theory
What is a theory
 
Metaphor Essay
Metaphor EssayMetaphor Essay
Metaphor Essay
 
Translation theory
Translation theoryTranslation theory
Translation theory
 
Inferenece and Anticipation in SI
Inferenece and Anticipation in SIInferenece and Anticipation in SI
Inferenece and Anticipation in SI
 
Animal Thought And Talk.6
Animal Thought And Talk.6Animal Thought And Talk.6
Animal Thought And Talk.6
 
Week 1.2 learning and using new words
Week 1.2 learning and using new wordsWeek 1.2 learning and using new words
Week 1.2 learning and using new words
 
E3 m7.2 Coherence
E3 m7.2 CoherenceE3 m7.2 Coherence
E3 m7.2 Coherence
 
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdf
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdfDharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdf
Dharmakirti_and_Thomas_Nagel_on_the_Orig.pdf
 
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory Ruth M. Kempson 1977
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory  Ruth M. Kempson 19772.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory  Ruth M. Kempson 1977
2.Explanations of Word Meaning, Semantic Theory Ruth M. Kempson 1977
 
Theory analysis
Theory analysisTheory analysis
Theory analysis
 

Metaphor-based psychoanalysis

  • 1. The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Estimated number of publications in the last three decades 40’000
  • 2. The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Estimated number of publications in the last three decades 40’000 Cognitive science fields involved in research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy Computer sciences Psychology Psychoanalysis
  • 3. The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis The Brain functions metaphorically
  • 4. The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis Reasons for increasing importance: The Brain functions metaphorically
  • 5. The increasing importance of metaphor within the cognitive sciences Number of publications Cognitive science fields involved in metaphor research, publications, and conferences Linguistics Philosophy increasingly Computer sciences conclude Psychology Psychoanalysis Reasons for increasing importance: Increasing interdisciplinary work regarding the understanding of the mind Driven by computer sciences’ attempts to emulate the functioning of the mind : knowledge harvesting rather than data collecting The Brain functions metaphorically
  • 6. Main task addressed in this presentation Assuming that Psychoanalysis is central to understanding the mind’s functioning The mind works metaphorically
  • 7. TASK How do we revise psychoanalytic theory from a metaphoric point of view without sacrificing its essential achievements ?
  • 8. PSYCHODYNAMICS current central concepts Transference Defense Interpretation Suggested central concepts Time Metaphor Transference Defense Interpretation organizing
  • 9. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toa present/past past/present
  • 10. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor Interpretation Transference
  • 11. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2) Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation Transference
  • 12. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2) Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretationinto Transference into Defenseinto Interpretation Transference
  • 13. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2) Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation into Temporal Metaphor = present/past Transference intoTemporal Metaphor =past/present Defense into Temporal Metaphor = Interpretation Transference
  • 14. In view of the importance of TIME 1) Recast from a temporal point of view Metaphor toTemporal Metaphor 2) Recast from a Temporal Metaphor point of view Interpretation into Temporal Metaphor = present/past Transference intoTemporal Metaphor =past/present Defense into Temporal Metaphor = Interpretation Transference
  • 15. Explanation of terms used in this presentation Terms Used ‘The present’ ‘The past’ to express Present mentation or experience Past mentationorexperience
  • 16. Explanation of terms used in this presentation Terms Referring to = “Defense Complex” Defending partof defense Defended against part of defense
  • 17. Explanation of terms used in this presentation Terms Referring to = “Defense Complex” Or shortened: Defending part of defense Defended against part of defense
  • 18. Explanation of terms used in this presentation Terms Referring to = “Defense” Defending part of defense Defended against part of defense
  • 19. How the terms are used in this presentation term ‘Transference’ ‘Interpretation’ Temporal Sense given here Interpretation of the present by the past Interpretation of the past by the present
  • 20. The definition of metaphor Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains
  • 21. The definition of metonymy Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equated entities (source and target) located in the samedomains
  • 22. The definition of metaphor Metaphor is an equation of two ordinarily not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains “Juliet is the sun” (domains: humans+ celestial bodies)
  • 23. Metaphor = “ in terms of ” Phrase indicating a metaphor : “ in terms of ” “Juliet is seen in terms of the sun” “Life is seen in terms of a journey”
  • 24. The definition and examples of metonymy Metonymy is an equation of two entities located in the same domain “The liver goes to operating room 3” “All hands on board” “He drank the bottle” Phrases indicating a metonymy: “stands for”, “belongs to”, “is part of”
  • 25. Phrases connecting source and target indicating metaphor or metonymy METAPHOR “in terms of” “Juliet seen in terms of the sun” “Life understood in terms of a journey” Metonymy “stands for”, “belongs to”, “is part of” The liver belongs to patient going to operating room 3 All hands stands for sailors to go on board He drank the bottle = wine as part of the bottle
  • 26. Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal concepts of metaphor
  • 27. Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal concepts of metaphor Linguistics: Linguistic metaphor, BASED ON LANGUAGE Cognitive sciences: Conceptual metaphor, BASED ON THOUGHT Psychoanalysis: Temporal metaphor, BASED ON TIME
  • 28. Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal concepts of metaphor Conceptual: Metaphor is an equation of thought entities rather than language entities. THOUGHT NOT LANGUAGE Example: “The New Testament relates metaphorically to the Old Testament: Christ’s death and resurrection relates metaphorically to the original sin and its forgiveness”
  • 29. Linguistic, conceptual, and temporal concepts of metaphor Temporal: Regardless of content and use the quality of the temporal relationship isintrinsicallymetaphorical in the optimal functioning Mind: The present is the same and not the same as the past. We understand them in terms of each othe TIMENOTTHOUGHT NOR LANGUAGE Example: Today is informed by yesterday: it is the same and not the same; one can be understood (in an underdetermined way) in terms of the other.
  • 30. Examples of linguistic, conceptual, and temporal concepts of metaphor Linguistic: LANGUAGE Conceptual: USE OF THOUGHT NOT LANGUAGE Temporal: TIME NOT LANGUAGE OR THOUGHT Life is a journey Christ’s death is metaphorically related to the original sin Adulthood understood in terms of childhood
  • 31. Neurosis Trauma leads to a loss of metaphoricity. As a consequence past and present relaterigidly (metonymically) to each other rather than informing each other. Neurotic defense (the present) comes metonymically to stand for the defended against (the past). The past evokes a rigid defense, thus over-determining the present rather than just informing it
  • 32. Phrases connecting source and target indicating metaphor or metonymy Metaphor = source/target interacting Metonymy= source/target not interacting Healthy Defense Neurotic Defense “stands for” past and present rigidly standing for each other “in terms of” past and present interact in terms of each other
  • 33. Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting? general psychology? treatment setting Transference Interpretation Defense general psychology Could these psychodynamic phenomena belong to the mind’s normal functioning ?
  • 34. Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting? general psychology? Treatment setting Transference from analysand to analyst as ongoing interpretation of the present by the past general psychology Transference intrapsychic as ongoing interpretation of the present by the past
  • 35. Are psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting? general psychology? treatment setting Interpretation by the analyst interpreting the past from and by the present general psychology Interpretation intrapsychic interpreting the past from and by the present
  • 36. Psychodynamic concepts relevant inthe treatment setting in general psychology Treatment setting Defense: interpretation of intrapsychictransference Defense (as defending and defended against) Interpretation of transference general psychology
  • 37. Psychodynamic concepts relevant forthe treatment setting ? general psychology ? treatment Transference Interpretation Defense general psychology Intrapsychic Transference Intrapsychic Interpretation Intrapsychic Defense O n g o i n g d y n a m i c s
  • 38. Psychoanalytic Practice versus Theory Practice We understand the present transference in terms of the past we understand the pastin terms of the present transference Theory This central part of psychoanalytic practice Is not sufficiently integrated by its theory
  • 39. Moving from content to time Language and Thought Content –centered domains Metaphor is a an equation of two conventionally not equatable entities (source and target) located in different domains Time-centered domains In psychoanalysis the intrinsically different domains of metaphor are temporal ones: e.g., past and present
  • 40. Functions of linguistic and temporal metaphors Influencing Informing Modeling and Searching Interpreting Actualizing Changing Familiarizing Forming new category Keeping at bay (new category organization from old category organization)
  • 41. Psychoanalytic concepts viewed from a temporal point of view Present to past Defending part of defense Interpreting Insight (updating) Curing Repression Remembering Regressing Past to present Defended part of defense Transference Insight (actualizing) Childhood neurosis Return of the repressed Memories Fixation
  • 42. Aspects of all temporal metaphors suggesting their synonymity Influencing Informing Modeling and Searching Interpreting Actualizing Changing Familiarizing Forming new category Keeping at bay (new category organization from old category organization)
  • 43. Psychoanalytic terms viewed as potential synonyms regarding their temporal function Potential synonyms (Present to past) Defending part of defense Interpreting Insight (updating) Curing Repression Remembering Regressing Potential synonyms (past to present) Defended part of defense Transference Insight (actualizing) Childhood neurosis Return of the repressed Memories Fixation
  • 44. Corresponding aspects between linguistic and temporal metaphors Linguistic Interpretingof one domain by another domain.( Life is a journey) Transferringaspects of the source to the target Maintaining tension, holding source at bay from the target while still relating to it Temporal Interpretingof one temporal domain by another temporal domain. Transferring: aspects of the past (source) transferred to the present (target) Maintaining tension, holding past as source at bay from the present as target while remembering the former
  • 45. Aspects of temporal metaphors as used by psychoanalytic terms Temporal Metaphors Psychoanalytic TERM Interpretingof one temporal domain by another temporal domain. Transferring: aspects of the past (source) transferred to the present (target) Maintaining tension, holding past at bay from the present while remembering it ‘INTERPRETATION’. Interpretationof past by present. ‘TRANSFERENCE’ Interpretation of present by past . ‘DEFENSE’ (as the defending part of defense) The holding at bay of previous organizations of issues while remembering them.
  • 46. Synonymous functions of psychodynamic concepts regarding their functioning in time Highlight synonymous functions of our psychodynamic concepts even though differing in temporal direction of influence InterpretationTemporal Metaphor =present/past Transference Temporal Metaphor = past/present DefenseTemporal Metaphor = present/past + past/present
  • 47. Aspects of temporal metaphors Therefore Interpreting Transferring Defending Are all functions of all temporal metaphors. This establishes the basic synonymity between the psychodynamic concepts transference, interpretation, and defense
  • 48. Healthy and neurotic forms of temporal metaphors HALTHY = METAPHOR Neurotic = metonymy Past and Present INFORM each other like source and target of a metaphor Past and present DETERMINE each other like source and target of a metonymy
  • 49. Healthy and neurotic forms of temporal metaphors Metaphor informs Metonymy stands for = determines INTERPRETATION informs past TRANSFERENCE informs present DEFENSE Defending and defended against inform each other INTERPRETATION Does not inform past thus determines it as immutable TRANSFERENCE Does not inform but determines present as repetition DEFENSE Defending and defended against can not inform but determine each other by standing for each other
  • 50. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? Symptom – centered view Transference Defense Interpretation No generalization to dynamic psychology of the mind outside treatment setting Psychoanalysis has little standing in academia Temporal Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Generalization from treatment to general psychology becomes possible Chance to improve academic standing
  • 51. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? symptom - centered Psychodynamic terms centered on treatment setting Transference and interpretation are phenomena, in the main, reserved for the treatment setting Centered – on General psychological functioning Psychodynamic terms centered on general psychological functioning Transference and interpretation seen as part of general psychological functioning, including in the treatment setting
  • 52. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? Conventional view Transference Defense Interpretation Time implicitly and not centrally integrated in theory Temporal Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Time explicitly and centrally integrated in theory
  • 53. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? Conventional view Transference Defense Interpretation Not primarily defined in terms of relations between the present and the past Temporal Metaphor-centered view Transference Defense Interpretation Primarily defined in terms of relations between the present and the past
  • 54. The three main psychodynamic concepts transference, defense, interpretation Conventional view Transference Interpretation Not extended beyond treatment setting Temporal Metaphor-centered view Transference Interpretation Extended beyond treatment setting as Intrapsychic transference Intrapsychic interpretation
  • 55. The three main psychodynamic concepts transference, defense, interpretation Conventional view Transference Neurotic enactment of past unconscious conflicts transferred to the analyst and experienced in terms of a now relevant relationship Temporal Metaphor-centered view Intrapsychic transference Ongoing interpretation of the present by the past, in and outside the treatment setting – neurotic or healthy, conscious or unconscious
  • 56. Psychodynamic concepts relevant for general psychology treatment setting Transference (from analysand to analyst) Intrapsychic - Transference as ongoing interpretation of present by the past
  • 57. Summary Transference Observed in the treatment setting Interpretation Carried out by the analyst Defense Healthy: “Sublimation” Neurotic: Mentation used to bar unconscious conflicts from becoming conscious general psychology treatment setting Transference Ubiquitous phenomenon in and outside the treatment setting Interpretation Carried out by the mind in an ongoing way as a reinterpretation of the past Defense Healthy: Present and past interpret each other Neurotic: When the present can not interpret the past the analysts interpretation is needed
  • 58. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? Conventional view Temporal Metaphor- centered view Transference Defense Interpretation These concepts are related not only functionally but more closely as aspects of each other Transference Defense Interpretation These concepts are only functionally related to each other
  • 59. The quality of the temporal relationship Healthy past present relationships are of metaphorical quality Neurotic past present relationships are of metonymical quality Transference Determining present Defense The defending part stands for the defended-against part. No mutual informing possible. Interpretation intrapsychic interpretation can not reach the unknown (repressed) past. The analyst’s interpretation is needed Transference Informing present Defense The defending part and the defended against part inform each other in an ongoing way Interpretation The present updates and thus changes the narrative influence the past has on the present
  • 60. Is psychoanalysis generalizable to become the basis for a psychodynamic psychology ? Temporal Metaphor-centered treatment Analyst’s interpretation Interpretation is metaphorizing lost metaphoricity Temporal Metaphor-centered general functioning Intrapsychic interpretation Interpretation is metaphorizing lost metaphoricity
  • 61. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretsmetaphorically the past = Interpretation The past interprets metaphorically the present =Transference
  • 62. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: = Interpretation =Transference
  • 63. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: = Interpretation of =Transference
  • 64. Structure of healthy defense SUMMARY: = Interpretation of Transference
  • 65. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretation of thepast The past interprets metaphorically the present
  • 66. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretation of thepast The past interprets metaphorically the present
  • 67. Structure of healthy defense We are using the interpreting aspect of metaphor which is already used in psychoanalytic practice. The present transference is understood in terms ofpast experience; the past is understood in terms of present transference experience. SUMMARY: Present interpretsmetaphorically the past = Interpretation The past interprets metaphorically the present =Transference
  • 68. Structure of healthy defense The past informs metaphorically the present The present interprets metaphorically the past
  • 69. Defense is Interpretation of Transference Metaphor and Metonymy Defense, Interpretation, and Transference are all Temporal Metaphors (when functioning optimally) or Temporal Metonymies (when functioning sub-optimally) Suggested Theoretical Integration Summary and Outlook
  • 70. First and second order temporal metaphors First order First order Second order
  • 71. Scaling of fractal hierarchy of temporal metaphors
  • 72.
  • 73. Defending part Defended against part PRESENT AGENCIES AT WAR PAST

Notas del editor

  1. It is convenient to differentiate three approaches to metaphor. These are the linguists’ notion of linguistic metaphor, the cognitive scientists’ notion of conceptual metaphor, and the psychoanalytic notion of temporal metaphor.
  2. Example: Father