SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Arts and Culture

Circulation of Library Items per
             Capita
Significance

Library availability is essential for ensuring that the
population has the proper resources to read and learn.
Core Indicator
• The circulation of items per capita per year
 demonstrates how easily the population can access
 libraries in their community and to what extent they are
 taking advantage of this access.
• Note that the data for circulation per capita are only
 available for libraries that are a member of the
 Canadian Urban Libraries Council (CULC), therefore
 there are are libraries in some regions that are not
 included in this data.
Canada’s Major CMAs
• In 2010, Montréal had the lowest circulation of library
 items among Canada’s major CMAs (6.6 items), while
 the two CMAs in Alberta had the highest circulation (see
 following chart).

• Circulation per capita per year in Edmonton was 17.2
 and 15.3 in Calgary, followed by Victoria with 15.2 and
 Vancouver with 13.2.
• The average for all CMAs was 12.0
Number of Library Items Circulated per
              Capita for Major CMAs, 2010
    20

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

     8

     6

     4

     2

     0
         Edmonton   Calgary   Victoria Vancouver   Halifax   Kitchener Hamilton   Toronto   London   Ottawa   Kingston Winnipeg   Montréal


       Source: Canadian Urban Libraries Council, Public Library Statistics
http://www.mississauga.ca/file/COM/2010CanadianPublic_LibraryStatistics.pdf
CMA Trends (2000 to 2010)
•   Within the last decade, the Internet has revolutionized the
    way people access information, demanding virtual library
    resources and negating the need to go to the library.

•   Paradoxically, between 2000 and 2010 almost all the the CMAs
    saw an increase in library circulation (see following chart).

•   Kitchener saw the greatest growth (up 3.7
    items/capita), followed by Halifax (up 3.0 items).

•   The only library with a decrease in circulation was Vancouver
    (down 1.5 items).
Percent Change in Items Circulated
   per Capita for Major CMAs, 2000-2010
4.0



3.0



2.0



1.0



0.0



-1.0



-2.0
       Kitchener   Halifax   Calgary   Kingston   Toronto   Montréal   Hamilton   Victoria   London   Ottawa   Vancouver


                    Source: Canadian Urban Libraries Council, Public Library Statistics.

More Related Content

More from Community Foundations of Canada (14)

2012 work fr
2012 work fr2012 work fr
2012 work fr
 
2012 safety fr
2012 safety fr2012 safety fr
2012 safety fr
 
2012 learning fr
2012 learning fr2012 learning fr
2012 learning fr
 
2012 housing
2012 housing2012 housing
2012 housing
 
2012 housing fr
2012 housing fr2012 housing fr
2012 housing fr
 
2012 health
2012 health2012 health
2012 health
 
2012 health fr
2012 health fr2012 health fr
2012 health fr
 
2012 getting started fr
2012 getting started fr2012 getting started fr
2012 getting started fr
 
2012 gap between rich and poor
2012 gap between rich and poor2012 gap between rich and poor
2012 gap between rich and poor
 
2012 gap between rich and poor fr
2012 gap between rich and poor fr2012 gap between rich and poor fr
2012 gap between rich and poor fr
 
2012 environment fr
2012 environment fr2012 environment fr
2012 environment fr
 
2012 belonging and leadership fr
2012 belonging and leadership fr2012 belonging and leadership fr
2012 belonging and leadership fr
 
2012 arts and culture fr
2012 arts and culture fr2012 arts and culture fr
2012 arts and culture fr
 
Water What Is Ailing Our Rivers And Lakes 1
Water   What Is Ailing Our Rivers And Lakes 1Water   What Is Ailing Our Rivers And Lakes 1
Water What Is Ailing Our Rivers And Lakes 1
 

2012 arts and culture

  • 1. Arts and Culture Circulation of Library Items per Capita
  • 2. Significance Library availability is essential for ensuring that the population has the proper resources to read and learn.
  • 3. Core Indicator • The circulation of items per capita per year demonstrates how easily the population can access libraries in their community and to what extent they are taking advantage of this access. • Note that the data for circulation per capita are only available for libraries that are a member of the Canadian Urban Libraries Council (CULC), therefore there are are libraries in some regions that are not included in this data.
  • 4. Canada’s Major CMAs • In 2010, Montréal had the lowest circulation of library items among Canada’s major CMAs (6.6 items), while the two CMAs in Alberta had the highest circulation (see following chart). • Circulation per capita per year in Edmonton was 17.2 and 15.3 in Calgary, followed by Victoria with 15.2 and Vancouver with 13.2. • The average for all CMAs was 12.0
  • 5. Number of Library Items Circulated per Capita for Major CMAs, 2010 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Edmonton Calgary Victoria Vancouver Halifax Kitchener Hamilton Toronto London Ottawa Kingston Winnipeg Montréal Source: Canadian Urban Libraries Council, Public Library Statistics http://www.mississauga.ca/file/COM/2010CanadianPublic_LibraryStatistics.pdf
  • 6. CMA Trends (2000 to 2010) • Within the last decade, the Internet has revolutionized the way people access information, demanding virtual library resources and negating the need to go to the library. • Paradoxically, between 2000 and 2010 almost all the the CMAs saw an increase in library circulation (see following chart). • Kitchener saw the greatest growth (up 3.7 items/capita), followed by Halifax (up 3.0 items). • The only library with a decrease in circulation was Vancouver (down 1.5 items).
  • 7. Percent Change in Items Circulated per Capita for Major CMAs, 2000-2010 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 Kitchener Halifax Calgary Kingston Toronto Montréal Hamilton Victoria London Ottawa Vancouver Source: Canadian Urban Libraries Council, Public Library Statistics.