This document summarizes discussions from a CRP on maize's Phase 2 dialogue with donors and partners. Key topics included prioritizing research, supporting partnerships, flagship projects, outcomes-focused performance, impact pathways/theories of change, and regional assessments. Partnerships were ranked highly on criteria like expertise, innovation, and responsiveness. Nine flagship projects were presented focusing on issues like socioeconomics, stress tolerance, and post-harvest management. Theories of change and intermediate development outcomes were discussed for research strategies targeting sustainable intensification, new varieties, and post-harvest management. Regional situations and opportunities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America were also assessed.
5. Flagship Products
1.Socioeconomics and policies for maize futures
2.Sustainable intensification and income
opportunities for the poor
3.Smallholder precision agriculture
4.Stress tolerant maize for the poorest
5.Towards doubling maize productivity
6.Integrated postharvest management
7.Nutritious maize (with CRP4)
8.Seeds of discovery
9.New tools & methods for NARS & SMEs
1-9. Strengthening local capacities
6. Todays Agenda
• Prioritizing MAIZE CRP Research 4 Development
• Partners and Prioritization
• Supporting Partnerships
• Flagship Projects
• Outcomes-focused Performance
• MAIZE Impact Pathways & Theories of Change, IDOs & KPIs
• Partnerships for Performance
• Regional assessments of the maize situation and outlook
• SIMLESA and MasAgro
• DTMA , Maize Lethal Necrosis, Doubled Haploid Breeding
• AflasafeTM
• The Way Forward
10. Taking stock of innovation platforms:
Understanding how best to mobilize
science and technology for
development
KIT
11. Todays Agenda
• Prioritizing MAIZE CRP Research 4 Development
• Partners and Prioritization
• Supporting Partnerships
• Flagship Projects
• Outcomes-focused Performance
• MAIZE Impact Pathways & Theories of Change, IDOs & KPIs
• Partnerships for Performance
• Regional assessments of the maize situation and outlook
• SIMLESA and MasAgro
• DTMA , Maize Lethal Necrosis, Doubled Haploid Breeding
• AflasafeTM
• The Way Forward
12. MAIZE CRP: Output-Outcome Mapping
Cutting-edge data and
knowledge on maize
genetic diversity and
sources of new allelic
variation are utilized by
public and private sector
Research
Outputs:
products
OutcomefacilitationOutcomefacilitation
Increased
productivity and
stability of farming
systems
Better targeting
and support of
new technologies
and institutional
innovations.
Smallholder
farmers adopt
post-harvest
technologies
Intermediate
Development
Outcome
Smallholder farmers adopt
improved maize varieties
(high-yielding, stress tolerant,
nutrient enhanced)
NARS and SMEs
utilize novel tools to
accelerate maize
breeding gains for
smallholder farmers
Profitable, resource
efficient maize-based
farming systems and
value-chain innovations
locally adapted by
NARES and promoted
by public, NGO, and
private sector
Post-harvest
technologies are
promoted by
NARES, NGO, and
private companiesResults of ex-ante
and ex-post
analysis utilized by
policy and
decision-makers.
Improved maize
varieties (high-yielding,
stress tolerant, nutrient
enhanced) adapted and
promoted by NARES,
NGO, and private seed
companies.
Maize breeding gains are
achieved more quickly and
efficiently by public and
private sector breeders with
a broader genetic base
Immediate
Development
Outcomes
Result
Strategy 3
Result
Strategy 2
Result
Strategy 2
Result
Strategy 2
Result
Strategy 2
Result
Strategy 2
Result
Strategy 1
Result
Strategy 1
Knowledge, tools, and
methods for better targeting of
interventions and policy and
institutional innovations for
enhancing maize technology
adoption, inclusiveness,
gender equity, market
access, and reducing
vulnerability
Integrated and scalable
innovations that improve
market access and
increase the productivity,
sustainability, and
resilience of maize-based
farming systems
Sustainable
precision maize
management
advice and
practices
Integrated
approaches for
reducing post-
harvest losses
and mycotoxin
contamination
High
yielding and
stress
tolerant
maize lines
and
varieties
Maize lines and
varieties that are
bio-fortified for
pro-vitamin A,
zinc, or essential
amino acids.
International
consortia for
maize
improvement.
Data on the
characterization of
international maize
landrace collections
and valuable
haplotypes
available.
Genomics and
bioinformatics tools,
breeding and
phenotyping
approaches for
NARS and SMEs.
Strategic
Goals
Positive sustainable change
in the natural environment
Enhance nutrition
and improved health
Enhanced
livelihoods
Enhanced
food security
Smallholder farmers
adopt mycotoxin
mitigation technologies
System
Level
Outcomes
Reducing rural
poverty
Increasing food
security
Improving nutrition and
health
Sustainable management
of natural resources
Profitable, resource efficient
maize-based farming systems
and value-chain innovations
adopted by smallholder farmers
Increased income of
smallholder farmers
Reduced aflatoxin in
maize value chain
Increased yields of maize
for smallholder farmers
Increased
nutritional diet
Reduced post-
harvest losses
25 %19 % 55 % 5 %
13. Research and
Engagement
with
Policy makers
Private sector
NARS
Communities
Theory of Change for Results Strategy 2: New Maize varieties for the Poor
Research and
Engagement
with
Policy makers
Research and
Engagement
with
individuals
households
System-level Impacts
Assumptions
Public (NARS) and Private (SME seed companies) are willing and able to test new germplasm.
Germplasm originating from MAIZE CRP is better than commercial checksImplementation Theory
New or
better
functioning
institutions,
markets and
maize value
chains
New policies/
instruments
External factors
Natural events
Trends
New
knowledge,
tools and
methods
knowledge on
socioeconomic
dynamics and
drivers of
agrarian change
Institutional,
market and
maize value
chain
innovations
Household
& farm-
level data
used for
targeting
maize
varieties
Assumptions
Seed companies & NARS are willing & able to put new maize varieties NPT testing &/or DUS
Assumptions
Public (NARS) and Private (SME seed companies) are willing and able to test new germplasm.
Germplasm originating from MAIZE CRP is better than commercial checks
Assumptions
Seed companies & NARS have capacity (technical/financial) to produce breeders & basic seed.
Improved SLOs
Outputs
Programme Theory
Regional adoption
New high yielding, stress
tolerant and nutrient
enhanced maize varieties
Regional on-station
testing
Regional on-farm
testing
Variety Registration
Seed Production
Smallholder farmers
adopt improved
maize varieties
Increased yields of
maize for
smallholder farmers
Increased
nutritional
diet
Increased income
of smallholder
farmers
Assumptions
Farmers’ are convinced of the value of new maize varieties and are willing and able to purchase.
Seed companies deliver quality seed ,at a competitive price ,in a timely manner.
New maize varieties are more profitable than existing commercial varieties or confer greater
fitness for the farmers’ environment.
Assumptions
Seed companies & NARS have capacity (technical/financial) to produce breeders & basic seed.
Improved market opportunity for farmers
Assumptions
National government, INGOs and private sector scale-out the new varieties
15. ResearchStrategy1:SustainableIntensification
andincomeopportunitiesforthepoor
•System-Level
Outcomes
•SLO1 Reducing Rural
Poverty
•SLO4 Sustainable
management of
natural resources
•Intermediate
Development
Outcomes
•IDO 1. Increased
productivity and
stability of farming
systems
•IDO 2. Increased
income of small
holder farmers
ResearchStrategy2:NewMaize
VarietiesforthePoor
•System-Level
Outcomes
SLO1 Reducing Rural
Poverty
SLO2 Increasing
Food Security
SLO3 Improving
Health & Health
•Intermediate
Development
Outcomes
•IDO 2. Increased
income of small
holder farmers
•IDO3. Increased
yields of maize for
smallholder farmers
IDO4. Increased
nutritional diet
ResearchStrategy3:IntegratedPost-
HarvestManagement
•System-Level
Outcomes
SLO2 Increasing Food
Security
SLO3 Improving
Health & Health
•Intermediate
Development
Outcomes
•IDO5 Reduced post-
harvest losses
•IDO6. Reduced
aflatoxin in maize
value chain
16. Todays Agenda
• Prioritizing MAIZE CRP Research 4 Development
• Partners and Prioritization
• Supporting Partnerships
• Flagship Projects
• Outcomes-focused Performance
• MAIZE Impact Pathways & Theories of Change, IDOs & KPIs
• Partnerships for Performance
• Regional assessments of the maize situation and outlook
• SIMLESA and MasAgro
• DTMA , Maize Lethal Necrosis, Doubled Haploid Breeding
• AflasafeTM
• The Way Forward
20. SeeD
Incentives for Seed
Companies to improve
quality standards and to
produce improved seed
and vegetative material
IMIC
- SINAREF: National
System of Genetic
Resources for Food
and Agriculture
- INIFAP: National
Genetic Resources
Center
- CINVESTAV, IPN
TTF
•Increase in
yield/ha
•Increase in
production
•Increase in
farmers
income
MasAgro
Policy commitment: Linking maize R & D
MAIZE
PROMAF Intensification in
medium to high potential
zones
Less than 3 ha Program:
SINAREFI: Incentives for
farmers that conserve
maize landraces
Extension Services:
Training and promotion of
MasAgro technologies
21. Sustainable intensification of maize-
legume systems in E&S Africa
Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania,
Malawi and Mozambique
>> Botswana, Rwanda,
South Sudan, Uganda,
Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Partners include: NARS,
CIMMYT, ICRISAT, Australian
organizations, ASARECA
Target: > 500,000 farm
families
30. Promising CIMMYT inbreds and
pre-release hybrids
identified
MLN-resistant lineMLN-susceptible line
MLN-resistant line
MLN-susceptible lineMLN-resistant line
33. • Development and field testing
of aflasafe™ 2009 to 2012
• Significantly reduces aflatoxin
contamination of maize
• Adoption of aflasafeTM by
extension agencies in Nigeria
• Low-cost manufacturing
facility
AflasafeTM
34. Todays Agenda
• Prioritizing MAIZE CRP Research 4 Development
• Partners and Prioritization
• Supporting Partnerships
• Flagship Projects
• Outcomes-focused Performance
• MAIZE Impact Pathways & Theories of Change, IDOs & KPIs
• Partnerships for Performance
• Regional assessments of the maize situation and outlook
• SIMLESA and MasAgro
• DTMA , Maize Lethal Necrosis, Doubled Haploid Breeding
• AflasafeTM
• The Way Forward
35. The Way Forward
• Strong impact & delivery orientation in many MAIZE projects
• Streamlining: ToC, IDOs, KPIs … across diverse regions, projects
• More realism is needed:
• “Assessing germplasm impact annually at a global level”
• Role of IAR and CRPs versus role of partners – They are at the interface of
farm level impact
• Test robustness of impact pathways, ToC, IDOs, KPIs – consultancies in
2nd half of 2013
• Develop Partnership and Capacity-Building Strategy
• Invest in performance partnerships (i.e., those that deliver)