Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (19)
Destacado
Destacado (6)
Similar a 2012 04 CIARD - Improving Productivity through Access to Knowledge Resourcespresentation - FARA - English
Similar a 2012 04 CIARD - Improving Productivity through Access to Knowledge Resourcespresentation - FARA - English (20)
Último
Último (20)
2012 04 CIARD - Improving Productivity through Access to Knowledge Resourcespresentation - FARA - English
- 1. 2nd Annual Ministerial Dialogue FARA Secretariat Improving Productivity through Access to Knowledge Resources Stephen Rudgard
- 4. Territory size shows proportion of scientific papers published in 2001 by authors living there. Copyright SASI Group (University of Sheffield) and Mark Newman (University of Michigan)
- 5. Books, chapter Annual reports Radio/TV reports or monographs Paper or articles (informal, non-peer reviewed) Theses Research reports commissioned Articles in conference proceedings Articles in scholarly journals
- 6. Source: Repository Maps - repository66.org Powered by Google
- 7. Accessibility of research outputs in international agriculture centres Centre A Centre B Centre C Indexed Full Text (In-house) Internet Search Graph by FAO. Source data from Agricultural Information Worldwide. Vol. 3. No.1 (2010)
- 8. Agricultural Repositories in Ghana Graph by FAO. Source data from INSTI, Ghana. March, 2010
- 9. 2011 Global Survey on Barriers to Research Communication s
- 10. A new way forward Coherence in Information for Agricultural Research for Development www.ciard.net
- 11. Coherence in Information for Agricultural Research for Development A Global Movement
- 12. The Community Founding Partners More than 150 other organizations participating… www.ciard.net
- 13. CIARD in 2012 Regional Consultations with Policymakers Endorsement through GCARD 2012 2007 2009 2011 2011 www.ciard.net
- 14. Endorsement of www.ciard.net
- 15. www.ciard.net
- 16. Pathways to achieve the Checklist
- 17. Vision Manifesto Checklist (Values) Pathways Fair Framework of Standards and Services www.ciard.net
- 18. CIARD support for overcoming the Challenges in Research Communication Our institution has no policy on We don’t have time to communicating adapt our results into the its outputs what extensionists want We have no systems Other scientists will and tools for Internet publish our results if we dissemination share them There are no staff with the skills in digital technologies www.ciard.net
- 19. Routemap to Information Nodes and Gateways www.ciard.net
- 20. Technologies and Practices for TECA Small Agricultural Producers Appropriate content and format for small producers + Searchable knowledge base + Breadth in topics, sources, geographical scope, and languages http://teca.fao.org
- 21. TECA User Groups Producers’ associations Advisory services (extension agencies) Research and development organizations Universities NGOs Private sector
- 22. - the Way Forward
- 23. www.ciard.net
Notas del editor
- Let’s move on to the next question: What do we communicate or better: what is the message we would like to convey?Obviously, our message is: TECA is a great tool, with added value for its usersWhile it is important to be able to name TECAs advantages, we found it is very important, also as we further develop the platform, to know TECAs comparative advantage; its niche among the many web-based services, which (1) focus on small-producers or (2) document technological innovation/ best practices or (3) provide an online platform for knowledge exchange. In a quite elaborate comparison and analysis we compared TECA to over a dozen other websites. What I present here, are only the conclusions we drew from this comparison. We drew the conclusion that TECA has indeed a clearly identifiable comparative advantage, not with individual features it has, but rather with the unique combination of features that other services offer as well.CLICK (see comm. strat. for an explanation of that point)CLICK (see comm. strat. for an explanation of this point)CLICK (see comm. strat. for an explanation of that point)We also want to share one of the more critical lessons we have learnt from this analysis and comparison. We realized that interactive knowledge exchange and sharing or to put it differently, to build a community requires specificity, be it a thematic focus or a geographical. See point 2.3.2.a (on page 5/6 of the communication strategy) on that point. This is one of the reasons why we plan to participate more actively in existing CoPs and interactive platforms. This takes us to the next question.