Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
Similar a Governor Brown's UC & CSU Performance Targets
Similar a Governor Brown's UC & CSU Performance Targets (20)
Más de CalCompetes
Más de CalCompetes (7)
Último
Último (20)
Governor Brown's UC & CSU Performance Targets
- 1. Governor Brown’s Performance Targets for the UC & CSU Systems California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy DRAFT April 24, 2013
- 2. Context
- 3. The Road Ahead 2.3 million degrees short by 2025 1 million bachelors degrees (PPIC) Career-Technical associate’s degrees and certificates Need a 4.4% increase annually, on average CSU and UC confer 73% of California bachelor’s degrees About 20% independent (non-profit) 7% for-profit
- 4. Gov. Brown’s Higher Education Agenda 20% funding increase over four years. At California Community colleges: Fund course completion Unit caps Require FAFSA for BOG waiver and inclusion of parental income At CSU/UC: No enrollment targets, but expectations for improved performance No tuition/fee increases
- 5. CSU and UC Performance Targets Number of Graduates… …who started there as freshmen …who transferred from CCCs …who are low-Income Graduation Rates Of freshmen: four years Of transfers: two years Number of Transfers in from CCCs Degrees per 100 FTE Enrollment
- 6. Graduates
- 7. Bachelor Degree Recipients Definition: Each year, the number of bachelor’s degree recipients who: …had started as freshmen at the university. …had transferred in. …came from a low-income family (Pell Grant recipient). Goal: By 2016-17, improve the totals by 10% over the 2011-12 total. Note: Counts of degree recipients are standard reports to the federal government, but with no differentiation for whether students started as freshmen or transferred in, or are low income
- 11. Graduation Rates
- 12. On-time Graduation Rates: Freshmen Definition: Of the new freshmen who start in the fall, the proportion who graduate within four years. Goal: Increase by 10% between the rate achieved for the entering Class of 2012 and the entering Class of 2017. Data not available for some years; actual targets would be updated for 2011-12 actual. Note: this is a standard measure reported to the federal government, though campuses often focus on six-year rates.
- 15. On-time Graduation Rates: Transfers Definition: Of the incoming transfers from community colleges, the proportion who graduate within two years. Goal: Improve by 10% the rate achieved for those entering in Fall 2013 (graduating by Spring 2016) compared to those who entered in Fall 2009 (graduated by Spring 2012). Note: this is not a standard measure already reported to any agency
- 17. Transfers-in from California Community Colleges
- 18. Number of Transfers Definition: In any single year, the total number of California resident students enrolling as transfers in CSU and UC, from California Community Colleges. Goal: Improve by 10% the total for 2016-17 compared to 2011-12. Data available do not precisely match the Governor’s definition. Note: This measure is not derived from standard data.
- 21. Degrees per Enrollment (Completion Ratio)
- 22. Completion Ratio Definition: In any single year, the total number of bachelor degrees awarded for every 100 enrolled undergraduates (full-time equivalent). Goal: Improve by 10% the ratio achieved for 2016-17 compared to 2011-12. ‘ Note: This measure is derived from standard data.
Notas del editor
- Increase HS graduation AND improve transition to college : California has a significant high school dropout rate , ranking 36th among the states in terms of high school graduation. Even among those who do manage to complete high school the college-going rate is low, with the state ranking 40th. If we had decent success 1/3 of gap could be closed.Close the college achievement gap: Persistent and largest achievement gap separating White and Asian students from underrepresented minority students, ranking 50th in the nation in terms of degree attainment. We have a gap of 33 percentage points while the degree attainment gap among these groups is 20 percentage points for the nation as a whole. This is not just a economic imperative, it’s an affront to our values around equity and fairness. If we were to close this gap entirely that would bring us roughly another 800K degrees, another third of the degree attainment gap closed.Increase degree production at community colleges: Community colleges give everyone a chance to get ahead, and so it is essential that they work well. But when we think about completion rates, our community colleges have a steep climb ahead of them. The California Community Colleges, however, rank 49th compared with other states in terms of completion. Improving attainment rates for transfer, degrees and certificates at community colleges could address a third to half of the 2.3 million graduate gap that we have identified.