As the first 2D material discovered, graphene possesses unique physical, electrical and thermal properties, allowing a very broad range of applications to be developed across multiple technology sectors, from materials to semi-conductors to biotech. “Our research also indicates that disruptive graphene technologies are likely to be rolled out by large corporations in the near future. While the graphene-based semiconductor chip is still a long way off, there are strong signs that smartphone players, notably Samsung and Nokia, could be incorporating other graphene-based technology into their products relatively soon” said Quentin Tannock (Chairman, CambridgeIP).

1. CambridgeIP
Patenting flatland: Graphene
Exploitation challenges
A patent-based intelligence report
with global graphene patent dataset
February 2012
Quentin Tannock, Chairman and co-founder
Richard Duffy, Associate
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

2. Presentation overview
• Why graphene?
• Patenting flatland: Graphene
– Graphene patent trends
– Activity in the graphene patent landscape
• Corporations
• Universities
– Report & patent dataset: Exploitation challenges
– Table of contents
• Access our report & patent dataset
• Appendix
– Nanotech patenting survey
– About Technology Profile Reports
– About CambridgeIP

3. Why graphene?
Graphene: A fast developing research-enabled
technology space, encompassing a very extensive
set of potential markets and applications.
• Graphene is the first 2D crystal discovered, with unusual electronic, optical
and mechanical properties.
• Graphene is of interest across industry fields as diverse as semiconductors
and biotechnology.
• Many graphene technology applications are in sectors which are notoriously
patent and litigation intensive
Examples of graphene applications include:
• Faster computers: More efficient transistors based on graphene could result
in thinner computer chips which use less energy and work faster.
• More sensitive and robust sensors: Biotech sensor devices, environmental
monitoring, oil & gas sensors
• Thinner and flexible displays: Flexible and transparent electronics
• Tougher and more conductive polymer composites: Much like multi-wall
nanotubes (MWNT), graphene polymer composites can make polymers and
other products, like natural rubber, stronger and electrically conductive.

4. Patenting flatland: Graphene - Overview
• Our report ‘Patenting flatland: Graphene – Exploitation
challenges’ builds on research and analysis around
university graphene patent activity, recently presented
in Nature Materials: Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon
flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
– CambridgeIP research for Nature Materials around the graphene
patent activity and collaborations of universities has been updated
and extended to analyse the entire graphene patent landscape and
focus additionally on the activities of major corporations and
leading SMEs. In addition the report considers the impact of leaders
in the publication of non-patent literature on the patent landscape
– The report is 70 pages long and contains 45 tables and figures
Corporate/University R&D networks
• Our dataset ‘Graphene patents’ is an expert verified
dataset of all graphene patents and patent applications
globally recovered in our research – more than 2,000. All
key patent information fields and all major jurisdictions are
covered.
Patent trends over time

5. Graphene patenting trends
• In the graphene patent landscape, there has been a surge in patent filings around
the world in recent years. From around 2007, we observe a spike in the number of
patent applications both from corporations and academic institutions.
• The overall picture that emerges resembles that of the semiconductor and
biotechnology industries and some early-stage technology spaces, including
nanotechnology, which experience particularly high levels of patent activity.
• Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
Number of patents: Annual and cumulative
University/Research Insitituions SMEs Multinational Other
900
800
700
Patents - yearly
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Pre-2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
© 2012
Patent numbers in the past two years may be under-represented. Patent
applications may remain unpublished for up to 18 months.

6. Corporations in the graphene patent landscape
• The largest corporate patent portfolios in the graphene patent
landscape are held by Samsung and Sandisk, reflecting clear
industrial interests in semiconductor and memory-related
applications.
• Key differences in corporate research and development (R&D)
focus and commercial strategies can be inferred from corporate
patent filings.
• Network analysis from Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland,
Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
Samsung‟s graphene patent network Sandisk‟s graphene patent network

7. Universities in the graphene patent landscape
• Across all years, there is a relatively high patent contribution
from universities and research institutes, consistent with other
relatively early-stage and research-intensive technology spaces.
• Table 1 highlights the most active inventors with university
affiliations or collaborations, and shows strong track records of
industry–university collaborations in both South Korea and the
United States.
• Table 1 from Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature
Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
Nr Name Nr of Organisational affiliations in inventor's Example Example patent title
patents Graphene patents patent
number
Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Samsung, Sungkyunkwan US20110127497
1 Jae-young Choi 62 Organic Light Emitting Device Using Graphene
University A1
Method For Exfoliating Carbonization Catalyst From Graphene Sheet,
US20090308520 Method For Transferring Graphene Sheet From Which Carbonization
2 Hyeon-jin Shin 43 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University
A1 Catalyst Is Exfoliated To Device, Graphene Sheet And Device Using The
Graphene Sheet
US20090071533 Transparent Electrode Comprising Graphene Sheet, And Display And
3 Seon-mi Yoon 39 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University
A1 Solar Cell Including The Electrode
Battelle Memorial Institute, Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials US20100096595
4 Ilhan A. Aksay 35 Functional graphene-polymer nanocomposites for gas barrier applications
Corporation A1
Hyun-jong US20110089995
5 34 Samsung, Seoul National University, Sungkyunkwan University Graphene device and method of manufacturing the same
Chung A1
Samsung, Seoul National University, Sungkyunkwan University, The US20110108521
6 Sun-ae Seo 33 Methods Of Manufacturing And Transferring Larger Sized Graphene
Leland Stanford Junior University A1
Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Apparatus And Graphene Roll To Roll
7 Byung Hee Hong 28 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20110195207
Coating Method Using The Same for Graphene
8 Yun-sung Woo 21 Samsung, Seoul National University, Sungkyunkwan University US20110108609 Methods Of Fabricating Graphene Using Alloy Catalyst
Robert K US20110042813
8 21 Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials Corporation Printed Electronics
Prudhomme A1
Graphene Energy Inc., Northwestern University, Texas Instruments Inc., WO2008143829
9 Rodney S. Ruoff 20 Graphene Oxide Sheet Laminate and Method
University of Texas A2
9 James M. Tour 20 University of Texas, William Marsh Rice University US20110059871 Graphene Compositions and Drilling Fluids Derived Therefrom
Coatings Containing Functionalized Graphene Sheets and Articles Coated
10 John S. Lettow 18 Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials Corporation US20110049437
Therewith

8. Technology Profile Reports: Overview
• CambridgeIP brings its significant experience in building
patent-based technology intelligence with leading
Patent trends over time
technologists and investors to create Technology Profile
Reports.
• CambridgeIP‟s patent-based approach provides a
different perspective to understanding investment in
Patents are inter-related
R&D, geographical distribution and size of markets,
market value chains, how a technology area is evolving
and what are the fundamental drivers of its long-term
performance.
• Our analysis helps readers identify and assess those
technologies where commercial value is concentrated.
Corporate/University Patents cost money and significant organisational
R&D networks
resources to secure and maintain. Patents can provide
a useful indication of those technologies that patent
holders are prepared to spend money to protect.

9. Patenting flatland: Graphene – In our report
• Graphene: Key enablers and barriers
• Most important graphene patents
– Top cited patents
– Largest patent families
• Graphene manufacturing techniques
• Timeline highlighting key events in the graphene
patent landscape
• Geographical analysis of patent activity
• Technology component analysis of patent portfolios
• Patent activity and company profiles of leading small and medium sized
enterprises (SMEs) in the graphene space
• Identification of leading major corporations in graphene by number of
patents filed, with example patents
• What to watch for in the graphene patent landscape
• Conclusions and recommendations for investors, researchers and
policymakers

10. Patenting flatland: Graphene – Table of Contents
Table of Contents
About CambridgeIP and Technology Profile Reports .......................................................................................................... 0
Other CambridgeIP Reports .......................................................................................................................................... 1
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
Patent-based Intelligence ................................................................................................................................................... 2
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... 7
Why Graphene? ................................................................................................................................................................. 9
Graphene History and Context ......................................................................................................................................... 12
Graphene, a Nanomaterial .......................................................................................................................................... 13
Graphene Technology ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
Patents in the Graphene flatland ...................................................................................................................................... 18
Who owns the graphene flatland? ............................................................................................................................... 22
Universities and Research Institutes ............................................................................................................................ 26
Sungkyunkwan University............................................................................................................................................ 30
Rice University ............................................................................................................................................................ 31
Manchester University ................................................................................................................................................. 32
Multinational corporations ............................................................................................................................................ 34
Samsung‟s graphene patent network........................................................................................................................... 36
Sandisk 3D‟s graphene patent network ....................................................................................................................... 38
SMEs .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Company profile: Vorbeck Materials Corp.................................................................................................................... 40
Company Profile: Nanotek Instruments Inc. ................................................................................................................. 41
Company Profile: Graphene Industries ........................................................................................................................ 42
Collaborations and licensing relationships ................................................................................................................... 43
Key inventors .............................................................................................................................................................. 43
Geography of patent filings: Graphene ........................................................................................................................ 44
Most frequently cited US patents ................................................................................................................................. 45
Patent families ............................................................................................................................................................. 46
Patent portfolio composition by technologies ............................................................................................................... 48
Most recently filed patents ........................................................................................................................................... 49
Patent trend conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 52
Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 53
Key developments to watch for .................................................................................................................................... 55
About CambridgeIP .......................................................................................................................................................... 56
CambridgeIP Executives ............................................................................................................................................. 57
CambridgeIP Products and Services ........................................................................................................................... 58
Appendix 1: Additional analysis of the graphene patent landscape ................................................................................... 59
Appendix 2: Methodology & Detailed Patent Information .................................................................................................. 63
Methodology................................................................................................................................................................ 63
Patent family explanation and context ......................................................................................................................... 65
Patent IPC Codes........................................................................................................................................................ 66
Disclaimer and Registered Company Information ............................................................................................................. 68
To read a report overview & table of contents in more details please visit us at
http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/patenting_flatland_graphene

11. Patenting flatland: Graphene – Access
Access the full report and full dataset here:
• http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/
patenting_flatland_graphene
Pricing
• Report $ 495
• Dataset $ 1,500
• Report and dataset $ 1,895
– Save $100
– Academic discount available, contact us for
details at info@cambridgeip.com.

12. Contact us
Feel free to discuss your specific technology intelligence requirements with us
Visit CambridgeIP‟s www.boliven.com for free patent searches
For a series of nanotech patent landscapes
 www.boliven.com/landscapes
Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev
(Chairman and Founder) T
(CEO and Founder)
Quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com
GSM +44 -077-862-10305 GSM: +44-077-863-73965
Tel: +44-1223 778 846 Tel: +44-1223 778 846
Corporate office Internet resources
Website: www.cambridgeip.com
Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd www.boliven.com
8a Kings Parade, Cambridge Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog
CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846 Sign up for our free newsletter
Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105 on our home page
12
© 2011 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

13. Take the survey: IP issues facing the nanotech community
• Our nanotech survey is ongoing and aims
to identify the key intellectual property
issues facing the nanotechnology
community today.
• There is an option at the end of the survey
to receive a summary of the survey
results.
Take the survey:
www.cambridgeip.com/index.php/knowled
ge-centre/nanotech-survey

14. Contact us
Feel free to discuss your specific technology intelligence requirements with us
Visit CambridgeIP‟s www.boliven.com for free patent searches
For a series of nanotech patent landscapes
 www.boliven.com/landscapes
Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev
(Chairman and Founder) (CEO and Founder)
Quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com
GSM +44 -077-862-10305 GSM: +44-077-863-73965
Tel: +44-1223 778 846 Tel: +44-1223 778 846
Corporate office Internet resources
Website: www.cambridgeip.com
Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd www.boliven.com
8a Kings Parade, Cambridge Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog
CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846 Sign up for our free newsletter
Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105 on our home page
14
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

15. Appendix Outline
• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
• Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
• CambridgeIP snapshot
• CambridgeIP experience
• CambridgeIP team
• Contacts
15
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

16. CS 1: Rapid mapping of large nanotech spaces - UK
nanotechnology patent audit
Client profile
Senior executives from a publically funded organisation approached CambridgeIP for assistance in mapping a broad section of the UK
nanotechnology space
Business situation
• A key driver was the need to inform our clients‟ strategy in this complex and patent intensive space
• Our remit was to assist client executives develop a clear understanding of the existing landscape, identify areas of relative strength &
weakness and existing R&D collaborations, analyse trends and provide statistical information & benchmarking data for use in business
planning and stakeholder reports
Our approach
• Working with CambridgeIP and senior industry experts we developed and implemented a complex patent search strategy
• Results were analysed using our proprietary tools and methods and a focus area for deep analysis was identified
• A workshop was conducted for client executives with our internal experts, assisting interpretation and dissemination of findings
Results and benefits
• Identification of fundamental technologies and key actors
• Insights into corporate R&D collaborations - identiifying key players in the
• Identification of areas of strength together with technologies applicable to patent space, together with their overlapping relationships
multiple sectors of application for future focus by our client
• Independent and fact-based assessments of the client organisations impact
• Understanding of recent M&A activity with significant impacts on the on UK IP assets, valuable in stakeholder reporting
ownership of the UK‟s nanotechnology IP assets
16
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

17. CS 2: University spin-off, competitor strategy analysis
using patent-based Intelligence
Client profile
A top UK University spin-out approached us for an IP Landscape report.
Business situation
• The client was backed by a major UK government funding organisation.
• The CEO of the company required deep intelligence about industry incumbents‟ R&D strategy.
• The client also needed independent analysis of the industry‟s patent landscape for use in technology licensing negotiations and
structuring a strategic partnership.
Our approach Results and benefits
• Working with the client‟s senior technical and business • The resulting patent-based intelligence was used in
representatives we defined the client‟s technology and market negotiations by our client.
spaces • The client felt that the findings on competitors‟ patenting
• We identified two technology focus areas of critical activity helped secure a go-ahead for a joint venture with a
importance to the client‟s technology with the client and major industry player: “The strategic partner‟s reaction to the
performed an IP Landscape report these two areas report‟s findings was startling: immediately inviting us to their
HQ to meet with their Head of Development to finalize an
agreement towards jointly developing a product.”
• The report has also been used by the client when applying for
participation Framework 7 programs, by demonstrating the
client‟s deep knowledge of the industry‟s patenting trends.
Competitor Analysis of Technology Focus in Client's Field
Assignee Rank by # of Total # Year of Total Patents Portfolio 5 Year
Name Patents in Patents in entry into in Overall Proportion Growth of The example shows how patent data can be
Client Tech. Client Tech. the field Industry of Tech. in Focus used to analyse the R&D strategy of
Space Space Space Field
competitors, and to develop licensing strategy.
Company 1 1 37 1993 6,576 1.6% 48.6% The findings suggest that Company 7 is
Company 2 2 25 1998 33 100.0% 56.0% aggressively expanding into the client‟s field: it
Company 3 3 19 1997 2,007 7.1% 15.8%
has the highest growth rate of patenting
Company 4 4 16 1992 1,646 2.1% 62.5%
activity. In turn Company 2 is most dependent
Company 5 5 14 1999 840 7.2% 92.9%
Company 6 6 11 1995 8,838 4.1% 63.6%
on this field for its strategic success: 100% of
Company 7 15 6 2003 400 1.8% 100.0% its patents are in the field of focus.
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

18. CS 3: IP Landscape® - nano-sensor devices
Client profile
A medium sized VC funded company delivering nano-enabled sensing solutions to the defense and homeland security sectors approached
CambridgeIP for assistance updating their IP portfolio and developing an up-to-date patent landscape
Business situation
• Sophisticated and well-advised client with good understanding of its IP space and competitors, holding a relatively large patent portfolio.
• Key drivers were to improve understanding of adjacent IP spaces, increase efficiency and structure in IP intelligence gathering activities,
inform investor communications
Our approach
• We audited the client‟s patent holdings, developing indexed and cross-referenced patent databases; We defined the client‟s space and
identified adjacent spaces, undertaking IP Landscape and benchmarking analysis against the client‟s existing portfolio. Business
intelligence and key statistics were extracted using the RedEyeTM suite of tools.
Results and benefits
• Identified technology migration opportunities & threats from
adjacent technology spaces
• Demonstrated client‟s dominance of aspects of its IP Landscape
• The client used our independent findings and analysis in
presentations to VC investors, as part of a successful Series C
funding round.
• Identified existing, known, players and new entrants to the client‟s
core IP space – including newly active academic institutes and
corporations
• Improved organisation of the client‟s existing portfolio, laying a
foundation for future portfolio management
• Identified portfolio gaps for our client to plug and areas for
consideration in future patent filings
18
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

19. CS 4: Accelerate licensing strategy development –
early stage surgical materials technology
Client profile
A leading UK University asked us to help identify market opportunities for an early stage surgical materials development
Business situation
• Previous market research had not resulted in uptake of the technology by corporate prospects
• A go / stop decision point was imminent as international PCT roll-out of an initial patent application approached
Our approach Results and benefits
• 20+ organisations were identified, were categorised by type and
arranged in order of priority for approach by our client
• Marketing objectives and recommendations were made in relation to
each organisation type
• Key geographical markets containing high profile licensing prospects
were identified for addition to PCT designated states lists
• Information on similar approaches, including diagrams, were provided
• We defined the technology space and implemented a multi-layer to client academic experts in a convenient format
search strategy that aimed at identifying
• licensing candidates
• potential collaboration partners
• key markets & applications
• critical geographical areas
• Information useful to marketing the technology
• Results and recommendations were presented to the client in a
PowerPoint summary report, and cross-referenced Excel dataset
• A workshop with the client's TTO representatives and client‟s
academic experts aids understanding and dissemination of results
and recommendations
19
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

20. Appendix Outline
• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
• Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
• CambridgeIP snapshot
• CambridgeIP experience
• CambridgeIP team
• Contacts
20
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

21. Our offerings
IP Landscape® Open innovation Technology Technology
mapping market survey
Expert built patent Identify technology Pinpoint emerging Identify market – Knowledge transfer
datasets focused on ownership in complex technology patterns technology niches in portal
your technology spaces & hotspots rapidly developing Access over 100
markets million scientific
Identify prior art in a Shortlist acquisition Understand documents, including
technology space opportunities technology value Inform in-house R&D the latest patents
chains strategy
Uncover inventor & Identify overlaps with Conduct technology
collaborator networks your own technology Identify technology Influence public literature searches
portfolio market & sector innovation
Clarify strengths & commercialisation support strategies Perform high-level
weaknesses of patent Conduct due scenarios analytics on patent
portfolios diligence on external data
partners Locate prospective Prioritise key market
Confirm freedom to partners, acquisitions segments and identify Collaborative patent
operate & technology Identify open and clients strategic partners & landscaping with
white space analyses innovation collaboration your colleagues
opportunities in your Information on opportunities
Support investment own and others‟ IP partner/acquisition Boliven Landscapes
due diligence and portfolios candidates operating Identify in what areas Access valuable
preparation for fund in your area of you need to build an patent datasets
raising CxO compatible interest IP Landscape combined with
materials, workshops industry expert
Understand market and seminars analyses
trends
21
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

22. CambridgeIP‟s technology and knowledge platforms
CambridgeIP‟s offerings are based on a combination of:
• Proprietary software and workflow platforms tested through more than 140 real life projects
• A 100 million document database of patent and non-patent literature
• Quality assurance and report standards that ensure consistency in the outputs for our clients
• The Boliven.com online platform of technology literature search and analytics with 8,000+
registered users and 30,000+ unique visitors per month
RedEye: our software analytics and workflow platform
Boliven.com: a leading portal for R&D and IP professionals
22
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

23. Appendix Outline
• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
• Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
• CambridgeIP snapshot
• CambridgeIP experience
• CambridgeIP team
• Contacts
23
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

24. Our clients
We have delivered more than 100 projects with leading
organisations: including major corporations, research institutes,
service providers, high-tech SMEs and investors
Selected clients:
… and
other
leading big
pharma
24
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

25. Thought leadership
Selected publications:
CambridgeIP is a recognised thought leader in the technology intelligence
space. Our research has been covered by the Harvard Business Review,
Financial Times, Nature Publishing Group and other leading media. Our
collaborations include Chatham House, University of Sussex and Cambridge
University’s Judge Business School.
25
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

26. Health and life sciences
Medical devices Pharmaceutical OTC drugs
Auto-injectors formulations Analgesics
Inhalers Excipients Anti-microbial
Endoscopy Carriers Anti- fungal
Ultrasound Liposomes
Wound healing Propellants Vaccines
e-Health Nanoparticles Dendritic cell
Capsules Recombinant vector T-
Diagnostics cell receptor peptide
Telehealth vaccines
Manufacturing DNA vaccination
Blood glucose
Heart rate processes
Blood pressure Spray drying Gene therapy
Biomarkers Freeze drying Silencing
Jet milling Tissue targeting
Filling
Active Packaging
pharmaceutical Regenerative
ingredients Generics medicine
Biopharmaceuticals Cell therapy
Bio-similars
Tissue targeting iPSC
Re-formulation
Drug conjugation Tissue engineering
Patents expiries
New chemical entities Cell-based vaccines
26
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

27. Clean tech and energy
Wind energy Fuel cells Nano devices
systems & materials
Biomass Advanced Geothermal
refrigeration energy
Systems
Photovoltaic & Clean coal
Refineries,
component carbon capture
power gen,
technologies CO2-EOR
co-gen.
Concentrated Marine Desalination
solar & other transport and water
energy storage sanitation
systems
Smart grid
27
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

28. Telecommunications and electronics
Wireless authentication Geographical systems
Physical/Remote access control GIS measurements
Merchant/Purchasing Satellite navigation/GPS
Digital credentials
Clean tech Telecoms standards
Smart grid ETSI
Smart meters Continua alliance
Transport management RFID
Distributed sensor systems Blue tooth
Energy harvesting Near field communication
Radio frequency identification
Internet & data handling
Search Hardware
Cloud computing Card readers
Data fusion Routers
Database replication Mems
Flexible displays
Contactless card
Mobile devices/applications
Satellite communications
E-reader
Mobile search
Application software e-Health
Media convergence Remote diagnostics
3G/4G/WiFi Device access control
28
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

29. Nanotechnology
Nanomaterials Tissue engineering
CNT Nano-materials
Graphene Nano-fibers
Nanoparticles Scaffolds
Nanobiotechnology Nanoparticles
Bio-compatible nanoparticles Colloidal gold
DNA nanotechnology Iron nanoparticles
Nanospheres Nanostructures
Nanoformulations Platinum nanoparticles
Quantum dots
Silver nanoparticles
Carbon nanotubes
CNT, SWNT, DWNT, MWNT
Functionalization Industrial fields
Production Advanced materials
Purification Automotive, Aerospace
Electronics
Paints & Coatings
Nanotoxicity
Nanotubes
Nanospheres
Environmental
Nanoparticles applications
Risk assessment technologies Construction materials
Energy storage, generation and
transmission
29 Water purification
©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

30. Appendix Outline
• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
• Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
• CambridgeIP snapshot
• CambridgeIP experience
• CambridgeIP team
• Contacts
30
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

31. Selected team members
Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev Dr Robert Brady Mark Meyer Ralph Poole Vladimir Yossifov
Chairman & co-founder CEO & co-founder Non-Exec Director Business Development Boston Geneva Representative
Manager Representative
North America
Arthur Lallement Helena van der Merwe Sarah Helm Yanjun Zhao
Senior Associate Senior Associate Senior Associate Senior Associate
31
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

32. Key team members 1
Quentin Tannock (Chairman & co-founder)
 Quentin leads our work in Nanotechnology, Materials, Health and Investment strategy. He has
managed IP Landscape, IP Strategy and M&A and investment strategy projects for multinational
corporations, investment groups and leading universities. His IP strategy related work has been
covered in Bloomberg, Nature Publishing Group, The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere.
 Prior experience: founder of a successful company in the chemical sector; law lecturer; facilitated
major R&D collaborations at Cambridge University (Electronics, Photonics & Nanotechnology);
member of Lambert working group tasked by government to draft model contracts for industry-
university collaborations; IP analysis & strategic advice to nanotechnology venture capitalists;
assisting Cambridge University Institute of Biotechnology start-ups (bio-nano diagnostic devices)
with commercial and fundraising strategies
 Education: Law, (Roman-Dutch, Common Law, International Law in Cambridge & elsewhere)
Ilian Iliev (CEO & co-founder)
 Ilian leads our work in Energy & CleanTech and Telecoms areas. Ilian has published widely and
has lead IP Landscape and IP Strategy projects for the full range of participants in high-
technology sectors. He has assisted multi-national corporations and SMEs with their industrial
partnering and fund-raising strategies.
 Prior experience: strategy & innovation advisory work for a Magic Circle law firm; award-winning
biotech start-up in Cambridge; policy advice; 1990s: founded and ran a 100+ employee business
in the electrical industry in Southern Africa
 Education: Economics and Management; Ccmpleting a PhD on „Innovation Finance‟ at the Judge
Business School, Cambridge University
Dr Robert Brady (non-Exec. Director)
 Prior experience: Founder of Brady plc a leading supplier of transaction and risk management
software solutions to companies and banks operating in the metals and minerals, energy and
'soft' commodity sectors. Dr Brady acts as an active mentor and advisor for several growth
companies, specializing in information technology and services. He is the current treasurer of
Cambridge Angels investment group.
 Education: fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he specialized in the field of physics.
32
© 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

33. …and finally…
Feel free to discuss your specific technology intelligence requirements with Quentin
or Ilian
Visit CambridgeIP‟s www.boliven.com for free patent searches
Thank you !
Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev
(Chairman and Founder) (CEO and Founder)
Quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com
GSM +44 -077-862-10305 GSM: +44-077-863-73965
Tel: +44-1223 778 846 Tel: +44-1223 778 846
Corporate office Internet resources
Website: www.cambridgeip.com
Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd www.boliven.com
8a Kings Parade, Cambridge Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog
CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846 Sign up for our free newsletter
Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105 on our home page
33
© 2011 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved