4. Cloud Service Models Overview
• What if you want to have an IT department ?
– Similar to build a new house in previous analogy
• You can rent some virtualized infrastructure and build up your own
IT system among those resources, which may be fully controlled.
• Technical speaking, use the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
solution.
– Similar to buy an empty house in previous analogy
• You can directly develop your IT system through one cloud
platform, and do not care about any lower level resource
management.
• Technical speaking, use the Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution.
– Similar to live in a hotel in previous analogy
• You can directly use some existed IT system solutions, which were
provided by some cloud application service provider, without
knowing any detail technique about how these service was
achieved.
• Technical speaking, use the Software as a Service (SaaS) solution.
4
5. From IaaS to PaaS
Traditional IT
Networking
Storage
Servers
Virtualization
OS
Middleware
Runtime
Data
Applications
YouManage
IaaS
Networking
Storage
Servers
Virtualization
OS
Middleware
Runtime
Data
Applications
YouManage
ProviderManage
PaaS
Networking
Storage
Servers
Virtualization
OS
Middleware
Runtime
Data
Applications
YouManage
ProviderManage
5
21. Ceph
• Overview
– Ceph is a free software distributed file system.
– Ceph's main goals are to be POSIX-compatible, and
completely distributed without a single point of failure.
– The data is seamlessly replicated, making it fault
tolerant.
• Release
– On July 3, 2012, the Ceph development team released
Argonaut, the first release of Ceph with long-term
support.
21
22. Ceph
• Introduction
– Ceph is a distributed file system that provides
excellent performance ,reliability and scalability.
– Objected-based Storage.
– Ceph separates data and metadata operations by
eliminating file allocation tables and replacing them
with generating functions.
– Ceph utilizes a highly adaptive distributed metadata
cluster, improving scalability.
– Using OSD to directly access data, high performance.
22
24. Ceph
• Goal
– Scalability
• Storage capacity, throughput, client performance.
Emphasis on HPC.
– Reliability
• Failures are the norm rather than the exception, so the
system must have fault detection and recovery
mechanism.
– Performance
• Dynamic workloads Load balance.
24
25. Ceph
• Ceph Filesystem
– POSIX
• File based
• Ceph Block Device
– RBD
• Block based
• Ceph Object Gateway
– Swift / S3 Restful API
• Object based
25
26. Ceph
• Three main components
– Clients : Near-POSIX file system interface.
– Cluster of OSDs : Store all data and metadata.
– Metadata Cluster : Manage namespace(file name)
26
27. Three Fundamental Design
1. Separating Data and Metadata
– Separation of file metadata management from the
storage.
– Metadata operations are collectively managed by
a metadata server cluster.
– User can direct access OSDs to get data by
metadata.
– Ceph remove data allocation lists entirely.
– Using CRUSH assigns objects to storage devices.
27
28. Separating Data and Metadata
• Ceph separates data and metadata operations
28
29. Separating Data and Metadata
• Data Distribution with CRUSH
– In order to avoid imbalance(OSD idle, empty) or
load asymmetries(hot data on new device).
→distributing new data randomly.
– Ceph maps ojects into Placement groups(PGs)PGs
are assigned to OSDs by CRUSH.
29
30. Dynamic Distributed Metadata
Management
2. Dynamic Distributed Metadata Management
Ceph utilizes a metadata cluster architecture based on Dynamic
Subtree Partitioning.(workload balance)
– Dynamic Subtree Partitioning
• Most FS, use static subtree partitioning
→imbalance workloads and easy hash function.
• Ceph’s MDS cluster is based on a dynamic subtree
partitioning. →balance workloads
30
32. Client
• Client Operation
– File I/O and Capabilities
Request
Client
(open file)
MDS
Translate file
name into
inode(inode
number, file
owner, mode,
size, …)Check OK, return
Return inode number,
map file data into
objects(CRUSH)
OSD
Direct
access
32
33. Client
• Client Synchronization
– If Multiple clients(readers and writers) use same
file, cancel any previously read and write
capability until OSD check OK.
• Traditional: Update serialization. →Bad performance
• Ceph: Use HPC(high-performance computing
community) can read and write different parts of same
file(diff bojects).
→increase performance
33
34. Metadata
• Dynamically Distributed Metadata
– MDSs use journaling
• Repetitive metadata updates handled in memory.
• Optimizes on-disk layout for read access.
– Per-MDS has journal, when MDS failure another
node can quickly recover with journal.
– Inodes are embedded directly within directories.
– Each directory’s content is written to the OSD
cluster using the same striping and distribution
strategy as metadata journals and file data.
34
35. Replica
• Replication
– Data is replicated in terms of PGs.
– Clients send all writes to the first non-failed OSD
in an object’s PG (the primary), which assigns a
new version number for the object and PG and
forwards the write to any additional replica OSDs.
35
36. Failure detection
• Failure detection
– When OSD not response → sign “down”
– Pass to the next OSD.
– If first OSD doesn’t recover →sign “out”
– Another OSD join.
36
37. Failure Recovery
• Recovery and Cluster Updates
– If an OSD1 crashes → sign “down”
– The OSD2 take over as primary.
– If OSD1 recovers → sign “up”
– The OSD2 receives update request, sent new
version data to OSD1.
37
39. Issues
• Highly developed
– 0.48
• Monitor waste CPUs
• Recovery into un-consistency state
– 0.56
• Bugs in file extend behavior
– Qcow2 images have got IO errors in VMs kernel,
» but things are going well in the log of Ceph.
– 0.67
• ceph-deploy
39
40. Issues
• Correct the time
– 0.56
• OSDs waste CPUs
– ntpdate tock.stdtime.gov.tw
– 0.67
• health HEALTH_WARN clock skew detected on mon.1
– ntpdate tock.stdtime.gov.tw
– ntpserver
40
41. Issues
• CephFS is not statble
– Newly system can use ceph RBD
– Traditional system could only use the POSIX
interface
• 0.56
– Ceph’s operation in a folder would be frozen,
» if that folder is getting heavy loading.
– Bugs in file extend behavior
REF: http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2013/06/24/what-i-think-about-cephfs-in-openstack/
41
42. Issues
• Mount ceph with
– Kernel module
• mount –t ceph …
– FUSE
• ceph-fuse -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf …
42
43. Issues
43
root@SSCloud-01:/# cephfs /mnt/dev set_layout -p 5
Segmentation fault
cephfs is not a super-friendly tool right now — sorry! :(
I believe you will find it works correctly if you specify all the layout parameters,
not just one of them.
root@SSCloud-01:/# cephfs -h
not enough parameters!
usage: cephfs path command [options]*
Commands:
show_layout -- view the layout information on a file or dir
set_layout -- set the layout on an empty file, or the default layout on a directory
show_location -- view the location information on a file
map -- display file objects, pgs, osds
Options:
Useful for setting layouts:
--stripe_unit, -u: set the size of each stripe
--stripe_count, -c: set the number of objects to stripe across
--object_size, -s: set the size of the objects to stripe across
--pool, -p: set the pool to use
Useful for getting location data:
--offset, -l: the offset to retrieve location data for
root@SSCloud-01:/# cephfs /mnt/dev set_layout -u 4194304 -c 1 -s 4194304 -p 5
root@SSCloud-01:/# cephfs /mnt/dev show_layout
layout.data_pool: 5
layout.object_size: 4194304
layout.stripe_unit: 4194304
layout.stripe_count: 1
45. Summary
• There are three type of storage in IaaS
– File-based, block-based, object-based
• Ceph is a good choice for IaaS
– OpenStack store images in Ceph Block Device
– Cinder or nova-volume to boot a VM
• using a copy-on-write clone of an image
• CephFS is still highly developed
– However, newer version is better.
45