The document summarizes a public discussion that took place on weblogs about the use of new technologies in education. Key points of consensus from the discussion include: access to technology is often not the real issue but treated as one; many innovative tools like blogs are free; and educators still need to study emerging technologies that are shaping culture, whether adopted or not. The discussion is compared to traditional peer review processes, noting differences like public comments, open participation, and consensus building in peer-to-peer review versus private reviews and gatekeeping in traditional models. Questions are raised about using peer-to-peer review in scholarly journals and classrooms.