7. Israel Local Government 2000-2010: From Damage Control to Sustainable Development cost prevent supervize minimize ignore Sustainable Dev. opportunity Reaction and treatment Planning and prevention objective recycle Clean production Sustainable consumption
8. CBCSCIL catalysts LIFE project; Center for Local Sustainability Education: schools, community centers Legislation: Environmental committees Local activity: NGOโs, individualsโฆ Municipal environmental units Professional training
9.
10. Regional Authorities: Masterplans for Sustainable Development Forum 15: Cities for Climate Protection Emerging Blue and White Local Leadership:
17. Regional Authorities Central Coordination Steering Committee Capacity building Coordinating and negotiating with the central government Developing tools and information Consultants pool Project Coordinator Budgeting Advocacy and support to the local level
18.
19. Regional Authorities: Masterplans for Sustainable Development Forum 15: Cities for Climate Protection Additional Blue and White Local Leadership: Environmental Tag for Resource Conservation
22. The Local Energy Initiative Capacity Building for Energy Efficiency in Local Government !!!!
23.
24. " it Pays to Think Green " Local Energy Efficiency Municipalities can attain at least 10% efficiency through behavioral changes and an additional 10% through technical solutions . Efficiency is attained within a year or two from beginning of process.
25.
26.
27. The Energy Calculation Tool # of students yearly cost yearly energy building 20,484 3,099,232 nis 5,945,152 Total High Schools Pre School Middle Schools Elementary
Most of the cities included in the database are part of transnational municipal networks Since the early 1990s, when CCP, CA and E-C were formed, membership in these networks has been growing. Membership in these traditional networks has become relatively stable. New breed of networks focused on the โpoliticalโ โ inclusion of Mayors, started in the US spread to Australia and NZ and globally. This is being in part driven by ICLEI. New interest of the โbig citiesโ in climate change โ C40, started in 2005 by The Climate Group and London to accompany G8 summit, now sponsored by the Clinton Foundation and with membership of 40 of the worldโs largest cities. London as lead player.
Most of the cities included in the database are part of transnational municipal networks Since the early 1990s, when CCP, CA and E-C were formed, membership in these networks has been growing. Membership in these traditional networks has become relatively stable. New breed of networks focused on the โpoliticalโ โ inclusion of Mayors, started in the US spread to Australia and NZ and globally. This is being in part driven by ICLEI. New interest of the โbig citiesโ in climate change โ C40, started in 2005 by The Climate Group and London to accompany G8 summit, now sponsored by the Clinton Foundation and with membership of 40 of the worldโs largest cities. London as lead player.
The existence of such networks clearly demonstrates that the โurbanโ governance of climate change is not bound by city limits. It is multilevel in the broadest sense โ not only about interactions between multiple levels of government, but also what has been termed โType IIโ multilevel governance, horizontal networking across scales, which creates new political arenas not necessarily tied to any particular territory. While governing tends to focus on the municipal authority, here are a range of other players involved โ national and regional governments, corporate actors, foundations and the sorts of โhybridโ networks which I have just discussed. This is clearly not โgovernmentโ in the traditional sense, but nor is the state absent โ governance is a term used to catch this complexity but I prefer to think about how governing , as a process, is conducted. Research comparing the experience of UK and German local authorities suggests we can think of four different modes which the governing of climate change takes โฆ.