SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 5
A scientific theory is what some might say is the nucleus of science. 
It can be defined as a “A well confirmed hypothesis that explains a 
large body of facts and which has inspired a large body of research”. 
The process that an observation turns into a scientific theory is a long 
and thorough one. There are four main steps and it starts off with an 
observation.
Have you ever observed something you thought was 
strange? Agatha Chrsitie famously said “Everything must be 
taken into account. If the fact will not fit the theory, let 
the theory go”. 
Darwin’s theory of evolution was inspired by the 
observations he made on the Beagle Voyage about the 
similarity of Galapagos wildlife to that on the South 
American continent. 
A scientific observation has to be observable by another 
human and have similar results. This is because human’s 
senses such as sight are subjective and unique to everyone. 
Anyone could make an error when looking at things like an 
optical illusion. This is part of the reason why scientific 
instruments such as cameras were developed.
The next step in developing a scientific theory is Hypothesizing. 
Oxford dictionary defines a hypothesis as “A supposition or proposed 
explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting 
point for further investigation.” 
Charles Darwin’s hypothesis was "Species originated by means of 
natural selection, or through the preservation of the favoured races 
in the struggle for life." 
A working hypothesis is a hypothesis that is generally accepted as a 
basis for further research with the hope that eventually an 
acknowledged science theory will be produced.
The purpose of testing a hypotheses is to determine 
whether observations of the real will agree with or conflict with the 
predictions derived from an hypothesis. But agreement does not 
mean the hypothesis is 100% true, just provides further evidence. 
George Mendel tested Darwin's hypothesis through plant breeding 
experiments between 1856 and 1863, he discovered that there is a 
recombination of parental traits in offspring. Sadly, Darwin and 
most other 19th century biologists never knew of Mendel and his 
research. 
Experiments should be designed to minimize possible errors, 
especially through the use of appropriate scientific controls. For 
example, Mendels tests were essentially double-blind tests as plants 
aren’t biased. Other scientists need to also test and analyse for no 
bias (Peer review). Other kinds of test include random and blind.
The last stage is creating a conclusion. Conclusions can be drawn 
when all the of the previous stages have been fully completed. 
“Based on the conclusions drawn from the data, the researcher will 
then find more evidence to support their hypothesis, look for 
counter-evidence to further strengthen their hypothesis, revise 
their hypothesis and create a new experiment, or continue to 
incorporate the information gathered to answer the research 
question”. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d80Lf76Ht18

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_16092597% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925Gordon Hirst
 
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus PseudoscienceNatural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus Pseudoscienceninasuth
 
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016Bishop reproducibility references nov2016
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016Dorothy Bishop
 
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. Bishop
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. BishopReferences on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. Bishop
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. BishopDorothy Bishop
 
Natural science and pseudoscience
Natural science and pseudoscienceNatural science and pseudoscience
Natural science and pseudoscienceNanase Isaka
 
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission cistiofo
 
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin KorbScience v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin KorbAdam Ford
 
Task 1 scientific theory presentation
Task 1   scientific theory presentationTask 1   scientific theory presentation
Task 1 scientific theory presentationcistiofo
 
2007 DUS Sophomores and Research
2007 DUS Sophomores and Research2007 DUS Sophomores and Research
2007 DUS Sophomores and Researchgfb1
 
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitude
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitudeDacota Blue: Scientific attitude
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitudeDaniel Tabinga
 
Dacota_blue: What is science?
Dacota_blue: What is science?Dacota_blue: What is science?
Dacota_blue: What is science?Daniel Tabinga
 
Natural sciences 2012 13
Natural sciences 2012 13Natural sciences 2012 13
Natural sciences 2012 13Kieran Ryan
 
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories cistiofo
 
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global IssuesLec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global IssuesJanet Stemwedel
 

La actualidad más candente (16)

97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_16092597% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925
 
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus PseudoscienceNatural Science versus Pseudoscience
Natural Science versus Pseudoscience
 
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016Bishop reproducibility references nov2016
Bishop reproducibility references nov2016
 
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. Bishop
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. BishopReferences on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. Bishop
References on Reproducibility Crisis in Science by D.V.M. Bishop
 
Natural science and pseudoscience
Natural science and pseudoscienceNatural science and pseudoscience
Natural science and pseudoscience
 
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission
Task 1 - D1 - Resubmission
 
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin KorbScience v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
 
Task 1 scientific theory presentation
Task 1   scientific theory presentationTask 1   scientific theory presentation
Task 1 scientific theory presentation
 
Task 1 m1
Task 1   m1Task 1   m1
Task 1 m1
 
2007 DUS Sophomores and Research
2007 DUS Sophomores and Research2007 DUS Sophomores and Research
2007 DUS Sophomores and Research
 
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitude
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitudeDacota Blue: Scientific attitude
Dacota Blue: Scientific attitude
 
Dacota_blue: What is science?
Dacota_blue: What is science?Dacota_blue: What is science?
Dacota_blue: What is science?
 
Natural sciences 2012 13
Natural sciences 2012 13Natural sciences 2012 13
Natural sciences 2012 13
 
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories
Task 1 - D1 - Resistance to new scientific theories
 
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global IssuesLec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
 
Scientific Method
Scientific MethodScientific Method
Scientific Method
 

Similar a Nada p1

Similar a Nada p1 (16)

P2.2 Scientific Methods
P2.2 Scientific MethodsP2.2 Scientific Methods
P2.2 Scientific Methods
 
G.Biology (ch1-2).KHKHHLHGBHKJHHGGGGGGGGGGGGHGJ
G.Biology (ch1-2).KHKHHLHGBHKJHHGGGGGGGGGGGGHGJG.Biology (ch1-2).KHKHHLHGBHKJHHGGGGGGGGGGGGHGJ
G.Biology (ch1-2).KHKHHLHGBHKJHHGGGGGGGGGGGGHGJ
 
Scientific Research And Essays
Scientific Research And EssaysScientific Research And Essays
Scientific Research And Essays
 
Scientific method vs. hollow earth theory
Scientific method vs. hollow earth theoryScientific method vs. hollow earth theory
Scientific method vs. hollow earth theory
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
What is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-science
What is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-scienceWhat is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-science
What is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-science
 
M &Amp; M Scientific Method
M &Amp; M Scientific MethodM &Amp; M Scientific Method
M &Amp; M Scientific Method
 
Nonsense On Stilts Summary
Nonsense On Stilts SummaryNonsense On Stilts Summary
Nonsense On Stilts Summary
 
Science Essays
Science EssaysScience Essays
Science Essays
 
The scientific method (text)
The scientific method (text)The scientific method (text)
The scientific method (text)
 
1. TEN MYTHS OF SCIENCE REEXAMINING WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW...W. .docx
1. TEN MYTHS OF SCIENCE REEXAMINING WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW...W. .docx1. TEN MYTHS OF SCIENCE REEXAMINING WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW...W. .docx
1. TEN MYTHS OF SCIENCE REEXAMINING WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW...W. .docx
 
Lec01 scimethod
Lec01 scimethodLec01 scimethod
Lec01 scimethod
 
Essay On Scientific Method
Essay On Scientific MethodEssay On Scientific Method
Essay On Scientific Method
 
Hypothesis woisri
Hypothesis woisriHypothesis woisri
Hypothesis woisri
 
8 The Scientific Method Summary
8 The Scientific Method Summary8 The Scientific Method Summary
8 The Scientific Method Summary
 
Anomalistic booklet
Anomalistic bookletAnomalistic booklet
Anomalistic booklet
 

Más de DavidOladejo (7)

Nada d1
Nada d1Nada d1
Nada d1
 
Nada p3
Nada p3Nada p3
Nada p3
 
Nada p2
Nada p2Nada p2
Nada p2
 
Nada m2
Nada m2Nada m2
Nada m2
 
Nada d1
Nada d1Nada d1
Nada d1
 
Nada p1
Nada p1Nada p1
Nada p1
 
Nada p1
Nada p1Nada p1
Nada p1
 

Nada p1

  • 1. A scientific theory is what some might say is the nucleus of science. It can be defined as a “A well confirmed hypothesis that explains a large body of facts and which has inspired a large body of research”. The process that an observation turns into a scientific theory is a long and thorough one. There are four main steps and it starts off with an observation.
  • 2. Have you ever observed something you thought was strange? Agatha Chrsitie famously said “Everything must be taken into account. If the fact will not fit the theory, let the theory go”. Darwin’s theory of evolution was inspired by the observations he made on the Beagle Voyage about the similarity of Galapagos wildlife to that on the South American continent. A scientific observation has to be observable by another human and have similar results. This is because human’s senses such as sight are subjective and unique to everyone. Anyone could make an error when looking at things like an optical illusion. This is part of the reason why scientific instruments such as cameras were developed.
  • 3. The next step in developing a scientific theory is Hypothesizing. Oxford dictionary defines a hypothesis as “A supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.” Charles Darwin’s hypothesis was "Species originated by means of natural selection, or through the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for life." A working hypothesis is a hypothesis that is generally accepted as a basis for further research with the hope that eventually an acknowledged science theory will be produced.
  • 4. The purpose of testing a hypotheses is to determine whether observations of the real will agree with or conflict with the predictions derived from an hypothesis. But agreement does not mean the hypothesis is 100% true, just provides further evidence. George Mendel tested Darwin's hypothesis through plant breeding experiments between 1856 and 1863, he discovered that there is a recombination of parental traits in offspring. Sadly, Darwin and most other 19th century biologists never knew of Mendel and his research. Experiments should be designed to minimize possible errors, especially through the use of appropriate scientific controls. For example, Mendels tests were essentially double-blind tests as plants aren’t biased. Other scientists need to also test and analyse for no bias (Peer review). Other kinds of test include random and blind.
  • 5. The last stage is creating a conclusion. Conclusions can be drawn when all the of the previous stages have been fully completed. “Based on the conclusions drawn from the data, the researcher will then find more evidence to support their hypothesis, look for counter-evidence to further strengthen their hypothesis, revise their hypothesis and create a new experiment, or continue to incorporate the information gathered to answer the research question”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d80Lf76Ht18

Notas del editor

  1. http://diploma-mill.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/scientific_method.png
  2. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=observing+wildlife&safe=active&espv=2&biw=1024&bih=667&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=SxZBVJaHLsPV7gbgr4DIDg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#safe=active&tbm=isch&q=Darwin+observation&facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=IId4Znfn0Oz-6M%253A%3BFineceYxO8oUoM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.darwinproject.ac.uk%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2012%252F08%252FBarnacles_3.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.darwinproject.ac.uk%252Fbarnacles%3B230%3B400 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Voyage_of_the_Beagle
  3. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/hypothesis
  4. http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_2.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
  5. https://www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychology-textbook/researching-psychology-2/the-scientific-method-26/using-the-scientific-method-from-theory-to-conclusion-123-12658/