Based on research of Stajkovic & Luthans (1998)

1. SELF-EFFICACY THEORY

6. Determinants of Self-Efficacy Successful Past Performance Provides the Strongest Information for Enhancing Efficacy Beliefs Provides Direct Performance Information Leads to the Formation of More Accurate Efficacy Judgments ENACTIVE MASTERY

7. Determinants of Self-Efficacy Observing Others Perform and Be Reinforced by a Similar Task MODELING Behavioral Modeling Strategy Development Verbal Persuasion Gaining (Successful) Enactive Mastery Increase in Self-efficacy VICARIOUS LEARNING

8. Determinants of Self-Efficacy Verbal Encouragement by: Credible (trustworthy) Others Expertise Others VERBAL PERSUASION

9. Determinants of Self-Efficacy PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE Physical Fatigue PSYCHOLOGICAL AROUSAL Vulnerability to Stress, Fear, Anxiety EMOTIONAL AROUSAL PA/NA

12. Work-Related Correlates of Self-Efficacy High Self-efficacy Individuals Activate Adequate Cognitive Resources, Sufficient Effort, and Behaviors Which, If Well Executed, Produce Successful Outcomes Those Who Perceive Low Levels of Self-efficacy Are More Likely to Not Even Make an Attempt, Cease Their Efforts Prematurely If They Do Make an Attempt, Fail on the Task, and Retain Self-debilitating Expectations About Their Personal Competence

13. Self-Efficacy Work Correlates : Managerial Performance Sales Learning and Task Related Achievement Job Search Research Productivity Adaptability to Advanced Technology Career Choice and Academic Behavior Coping With Career Related Events Skill Acquisition Newcomer Adjustment to the Organizational Setting Naval Performance at Sea

14. The Latest Research on Self-Efficacy Stajkovic & Luthans (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 124, 240-261. To Meta-analytically Aggregate and Analyze Individual Research Findings Pertaining to the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Task Performance What is the average magnitude of the relationship between self-efficacy and task-performance? Are there any study characteristics (moderators) that systematically moderate this relationship?

15. Stajkovic & Luthans (1998) The final sample consisted of: s = 114 studies k = 157 correlation estimates Total sample size N = 21,626 The average sample size per correlation estimate was 138 subjects

16. Stajkovic & Luthans (1998 ) An average weighted correlation between self-efficacy and work-related performance of (G)r = .38, , which transforms to an impressive 28 percent gain in task performance . Importantly, for managing today’s human resources, this 28% increase in task performance due to self-efficacy represents a greater gain than those obtained in meta-analyses examining the effects on task performance of: Goal-Setting (10.39%) (Wood et al., 1987), Feedback Interventions (13.6%) (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996) Organizational Behavior Modification (17%) (Stajkovic & Luthans, 1997)