This document is the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Technology and Innovation Report 2012. It focuses on how South-South collaboration can help address key capacity issues faced by developing countries in technology and innovation.
The report finds that trade and foreign direct investment between developing countries has increased significantly in recent decades. This has led to greater exchange of capital goods and participation in global production networks, with implications for the technological and innovative capabilities of these countries. However, there are also growing divergences, as some emerging economies invest more in research and development while least developed countries lag behind. The report examines these trends and discusses how South-South cooperation can help close technology gaps and strengthen innovation in the developing world.
Premium Call Girls Btm Layout - 7001305949 Escorts Service with Real Photos a...
Innovation and Technology Collaboration in the Global South
1. Innovation, Technology
and South-South Collaboration
TECHNOLOGY
AND INNOVATION
REPORT 2012
U N I T E D N A T I O N S C O N F E R E N C E O N T R A D E A N D D E V E L O P M E N T
EMBARGO
The contents of this Report must not be
quoted or summarized in the print,
broadcast or electronic media before
31 October 2012, 17:00 hours GMT
2. Innovation, Technology
and South-South Collaboration
TECHNOLOGY
AND INNOVATION
REPORT 2012
New York and Geneva, 2012
U N I T E D N A T I O N S C O N F E R E N C E O N T R A D E A N D D E V E L O P M E N T
3. ii TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
NOTE
The terms country/economy as used in this Report also refer, as appropriate, to territories or areas; the designations
employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of
the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authori-
ties, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In addition, the designations of country groups are
intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage of
development reached by a particular country or area in the development process. The major country groupings used
LQ WKLV 5HSRUW IROORZ WKH FODVVLƄFDWLRQ RI WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQV 6WDWLVWLFDO 2IƄFH 'HWDLOV RI WKH FODVVLƄFDWLRQ DUH SURYLGHG
in Annex I of this Report.
The boundaries and names shown and designations used on the maps presented in this publication do not imply of-
ƄFLDO HQGRUVHPHQW RU DFFHSWDQFH E WKH 8QLWHG 1DWLRQV
Symbols which may have been used in the tables denote the following:
s 7ZR GRWV
4. LQGLFDWH WKDW GDWD DUH QRW DYDLODEOH RU DUH QRW VHSDUDWHO UHSRUWHG 5RZV LQ WDEOHV DUH RPLWWHG LQ WKRVH
cases where no data are available for any of the elements in the row.
s $ GDVK t
11. iiiPREFACE
PREFACE
7KHUH LV QR GRXEW DERXW WKH SRWHQWLDO RI UDSLG WHFKQRORJLFDO SURJUHVV WR KHOS WKH ZRUOG PHHW WKH GHƄQLQJ FKDOOHQJHV
of our time. Yet for many individuals in the developing world, access is still a major challenge, hindering their ability
to learn
how to use technologies that would improve their lives and promote enterprise development. That challenge is
PXOWLSOLHG PDQ WLPHV RYHU IRU QDWLRQDO SROLFPDNHUV VHHNLQJ WR XVH WHFKQRORJLHV WR DGGUHVV HQHUJ SRYHUW IRRG
insecurity, environmental threats and job creation.
Bridging the technological divide has become a core concern of the
8QLWHG 1DWLRQV ,I ZH DUH WR EXLOG RQ DQG H[SDQG WKH SURJUHVV WKDW KDV EHHQ PDGH WRZDUGV WKH 0LOOHQQLXP 'HYHORS-
PHQW *RDOV WKH LQWHUQDWLRQDO FRPPXQLW ZLOO QHHG WR ƄQG LQQRYDWLYH ZDV RI FORVLQJ WKLV JDS
The increasing capacity of a growing number of countries in the South is a promising dynamic that signals the begin-
ning of a new era in global development.
$V PRUH DQG PRUH GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV HPEDUN RQ WKH SURFHVV RI LQGXVWULDO FDWFKXS 6RXWK6RXWK FRRSHUDWLRQ FDQ
help to address the technological divide.
7KH 817$' Technology and Innovation Report 2012 focuses on how South-South collaboration can help address
NH FDSDFLW TXHVWLRQV IDFHG E GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV 7KH LQIRUPDWLRQ DQG DQDOVLV FRQWDLQHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW PDUN D
ZHOFRPH FRQWULEXWLRQ WR WKH HIIRUWV QRZ JHWWLQJ XQGHU ZD WR HVWDEOLVK D VHW RI 6XVWDLQDEOH 'HYHORSPHQW *RDOV DQG
WR RXWOLQH D SRVW GHYHORSPHQW DJHQGD
I encourage governments and development partners to carefully consider the report’s recommendations as we con-
VLGHU KRZ EHVW WR SURPRWH HTXLWDEOH VXVWDLQDEOH DQG LQFOXVLYH GHYHORSPHQW IRU DOO
BAN Ki-moon
Secretary-General
United Nations
12. iv TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
7KLV 7HFKQRORJ DQG ,QQRYDWLRQ 5HSRUW ZDV SUHSDUHG E D WHDP OHG E 3DGPDVKUHH *HKO 6DPSDWK 0DLQ DXWKRU DQG
KLHI 7DVNIRUFH RQ WKH 7HFKQRORJ DQG ,QQRYDWLRQ 5HSRUW 6HULHV
29. v217(176
CONTENTS
Note...............................................................................................................................................................ii
Preface .........................................................................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................................iv
Contents....................................................................................................................................................... v
List of abbreviations.....................................................................................................................................xi
Overview ....................................................................................................................................................xiii
CHAPTER I THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOUTH .............................................................. 3
A. BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................................3
B. SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION: KEY ARGUMENTS .......................................................................................6
*URZLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK WUDGH DQG LWV LPSOLFDWLRQV.......................................................................................6
2. South-South investment as a driver of development ................................................................................8
C. THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF THE SOUTH IN TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING AND INNOVATION ................11
7KH 6RXWK DV D FRPSOHPHQW WR WKH 1RUWK IRU WHFKQRORJ DQG LQQRYDWLRQ................................................
2YHUFRPLQJ FKDOOHQJHV DQG GLYHUJHQW LQWHUHVWV......................................................................................
'HƄQLWLRQV RI NH WHUPV..........................................................................................................................
a. Emerging countries ..........................................................................................................................
b. Technological collaboration ..............................................................................................................
c. Technology transfer..........................................................................................................................
d. Innovation capacity ..........................................................................................................................
D. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT....................................................................................................................16
CHAPTER II THE EMERGING LANDSCAPE OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
EXCHANGE IN THE SOUTH....................................................................... 21
A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................21
B. INCREASE IN IMPORTS OF CAPITAL GOODS FROM THE SOUTH...............................................................22
*URZLQJ WHFKQRORJLFDO LQWHQVLW RI LPSRUWV DQG SDUWLFLSDWLRQ LQ SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV ..............................
6RXWK6RXWK )', DQG WHFKQRORJ ƅRZV ..................................................................................................
D 2XWZDUG )', IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV ...........................................................................................
E 6HFWRUDO FRPSRVLWLRQ RI 6RXWK6RXWK )', RXWƅRZV ....................................................................................
C. IMPLICATIONS OF ONGOING SOUTH-SOUTH EXCHANGE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
CAPACITY ...........................................................................................................................................................35
*URZLQJ WHFKQRORJLFDO GLYHUJHQFH LQ WKH 6RXWK......................................................................................
D DSLWDO JRRGV LPSRUWV RI GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DQG /'V ...............................................................
E 5 ' WUHQGV LQ HPHUJLQJ FRXQWULHV....................................................................................................
F /LFHQVLQJ DQG SDWHQWLQJ WUHQGV .......................................................................................................
2. The leading importers, exporters and innovators in the South..................................................................
a. Manufacturing productivity and technological progress ....................................................................
b. Participation in GPNs and technological learning..............................................................................
7KH ULVH RI GHYHORSLQJFRXQWU 71V .....................................................................................................
D $ UHJLRQDO SHUVSHFWLYH RQ GHYHORSLQJFRXQWU PHUJHUV DQG DFTXLVLWLRQV ..........................................
E 6HFWRUDO FRPSRVLWLRQ RI FURVVERUGHU PHUJHUV DQG DFTXLVLWLRQV.......................................................
D. CHAPTER SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................42
30. vi TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
CHAPTER III ASSESSING ONGOING SOUTH-SOUTH TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION:
EXAMPLES AND POLITICAL INITIATIVES .................................................... 47
A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................47
B. INTER-FIRM TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION........................................................................................47
3KDUPDFHXWLFDOV DQG KHDOWK FDUH............................................................................................................
D 8JDQGD -RLQW YHQWXUH EHWZHHQ 4XDOLW KHPLFDOV 8JDQGD
32. ........
E (WKLRSLD 6($$ t D MRLQW YHQWXUH ZLWK KLQHVH ƄUPV..........................................................................
F (JSW 9$6(5$ t D MRLQW YHQWXUH ZLWK 'RQJEDR KLQD
33. ..................................................................
2. Renewable energy technologies.............................................................................................................
6XPPLQJ XS .........................................................................................................................................
C. PUBLIC SECTOR TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION................................................................................50
%UD]LO......................................................................................................................................................
a. Embrapa..........................................................................................................................................
E 2VZDOGR UX] )RXQGDWLRQ ..............................................................................................................
c. SENAI..............................................................................................................................................
2. India ......................................................................................................................................................
D ,QGLD3DQ $IULFD H1HWZRUN 7HFKQLFDO ROODERUDWLRQ DQG .QRZOHGJH 6KDULQJ ...................................
E ,QGLDpV FROODERUDWLRQ RQ KXPDQ JHQRPH VHTXHQFLQJ ........................................................................
c. India’s collaboration on RETs development.......................................................................................
KLQD.....................................................................................................................................................
a. Chinese-Angolan ICT infrastructure development collaboration ........................................................
E /LJKWHQ XS $IULFD 3URMHFW DQ H[DPSOH RI FROODERUDWLRQ EHWZHHQ KLQD $IULFDQ FRXQWULHV
DQG 81,'2 ......................................................................................................................................
0H[LFR ..................................................................................................................................................
a. Programme for strengthening capacities for the development of technological projects in
DTXDFXOWXUH......................................................................................................................................
E 'HYHORSPHQW RI ELRVHFXULW SURWRFRO LQ ODERUDWRULHV JUHHQKRXVHV DQG ƄHOGV ZLWK JHQHWLFDOO PRGLƄHG
organisms in Peru ............................................................................................................................
c. Course in non-destructive practices ................................................................................................
6DXGL $UDELD .........................................................................................................................................
D. MAJOR GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES FOR SOUTH-SOUTH TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION ...........58
5HFHQW PDMRU LQWHUJRYHUQPHQWDO LQLWLDWLYHV .............................................................................................
a. BRICS summits................................................................................................................................
E 7KH ,QGLD%UD]LO6RXWK $IULFD 'LDORJXH )RUXP ..................................................................................
F 7KH ,VWDQEXO 3ODQ RI $FWLRQ DQG WKH 7XUNLVK ,QLWLDWLYH.........................................................................
2WKHU JRYHUQPHQW LQLWLDWLYHV ..................................................................................................................
a. Africa ..............................................................................................................................................
i. Africa’s Science and Technology Consolidated Plan of Action .....................................................
ii. African Economic Community .....................................................................................................
LLL 7HFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQ LQ WKH (FRQRPLF RPPXQLW RI :HVW $IULFDQ 6WDWHV DQG
WKH 6RXWKHUQ $IULFDQ 'HYHORSPHQW RPPXQLW ........................................................................... 62
b. Asia.................................................................................................................................................. 62
i. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations ................................................................................ 62
F /DWLQ $PHULFD DQG WKH DULEEHDQ ..................................................................................................... 62
,QWHUUHJLRQDO FRRSHUDWLRQ........................................................................................................................
D 1HZ $VLDQ$IULFDQ 6WUDWHJLF 3DUWQHUVKLS 1$$63
35. vii217(176
E. IMPACTS OF ONGOING ACTIVITIES ON TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION CAPACITY ............................65
F. CHAPTER SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................66
CHAPTER IV HOW CAN THE SOUTH PROVIDE A NEW IMPETUS FOR BUILDING
INNOVATIVE CAPACITY? .......................................................................... 73
A. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................73
B. PRINCIPLE 1: INTEGRATING THE TECHNOLOGICAL NEEDS OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INTO
SOUTH-SOUTH EXCHANGES...........................................................................................................................75
%XLOGLQJ DEVRUSWLYH FDSDFLWLHV WR WDS LQWR 6RXWK6RXWK WUDGH DQG JOREDO SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV ...............
2. Targeting internal and external constraints on building capabilities .........................................................
a. Internal constraints on building capabilities.......................................................................................
L ,QDGHTXDWH LQYHVWPHQWV LQ WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ ........................................................................
LL :HDN VXSSRUW WR ORFDO HQWHUSULVHV ...............................................................................................
LLL :HDN LQVWLWXWLRQDO OLQNDJHV ........................................................................................................... 80
LY ,QDGHTXDWH GRPHVWLF UHVRXUFHV WR FUHDWH D VXSSRUWLYH HQYLURQPHQW IRU LQQRYDWLRQ....................... 80
b. External constraints on learning and building capabilities..................................................................
C. PRINCIPLE 2: SHARING EXPERIENCES IN BUILDING INNOVATION CAPABILITIES THROUGH
PROACTIVE POLICIES ..................................................................................................................................................81
*HQHUDO SROLF LQVLJKWV IURP FRXQWUOHYHO H[SHULHQFHV ..........................................................................82
6SHFLƄF SROLF VWUDWHJLHV DQG SROLF OLQNDJHV WR SURPRWH LQQRYDWLRQOHG JURZWK.....................................82
a. The role of the State in promoting technological learning.................................................................. 82
b. Appropriate technologies for technological catch-up........................................................................
F ,35V ƅH[LELOLWLHV DQG OHDUQLQJ RSWLRQV ...............................................................................................
L ,QGLD8JDQGD FROODERUDWLRQ 4XDOLW KHPLFDOV 8JDQGD
37. ......... 86
ii. Technological collaboration in Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical sector ............................................. 86
LLL /LQNLQJ LQQRYDWLRQ SROLFLHV WR EURDGHU LQGXVWULDO SROLF .................................................................
D. PRINCIPLE 3: PROMOTING LEARNING THROUGH ALLIANCES AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER...........87
3URPRWLQJ VWUDWHJLF DOOLDQFHV IRU RYHUDOO WHFKQRORJLFDO JURZWK.................................................................88
2. Technology transfer and developing countries........................................................................................
E. PRINCIPLE 4: MAKING DEVELOPING-COUNTRY FDI MORE TECHNOLOGY ORIENTED..........................91
F. PRINCIPLE 5: POOLING RESOURCES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TO ADDRESS COMMON
TECHNOLOGICAL CHALLENGES.....................................................................................................................91
G. LEVERAGING THE SOUTH FOR TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION: POLICY INCENTIVES AND
ACTIONS .............................................................................................................................................................92
)RVWHULQJ DEVRUSWLYH FDSDFLW WKURXJK 6RXWK6RXWK FROODERUDWLRQ ..........................................................
a. Coordinating local and regional innovation policies with South-South collaboration initiatives ...........
E 3URYLGLQJ VSHFLƄF LQFHQWLYHV WR HQFRXUDJH D VKLIW WRZDUGV JUHDWHU YDOXH DGGHG DFWLYLWLHV..................
c. Policy incentives in emerging countries for a greater technological focus .........................................
i. Adopt policies that promote a long-term technological orientation ...............................................
LL $GRSW SROLFLHV WKDW OLQN WHFKQLFDO DQG VFLHQWLƄF FRRSHUDWLRQ ZLWK WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQ .......
LLL 3URYLGH LQFHQWLYHV WR ƄUPV IRU WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQ DQG WHFKQRORJ WUDQVIHU ......................
2. Adopting policies that promote technological alliances and collaborations..............................................
a. Technological learning through public procurement ..........................................................................
b. Strengthening and promoting technological alliances .......................................................................
i. Competition policy.......................................................................................................................
ii. Contract enforcement..................................................................................................................
iii. Public subsidies...........................................................................................................................
38. viii TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
$GGUHVVLQJ FRPPRQ FKDOOHQJHV WKURXJK 6,7(3.....................................................................................
D 7HFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ DW WKH ƄUP OHYHO................................................................................................
i. South-South research and product development hubs ................................................................
ii. South-South pooling of supply and demand................................................................................
E (QWHUSULVH GHYHORSPHQW DQG ƄQDQFLQJ RI LQQRYDWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV.........................................................
L 9HQWXUH FDSLWDO IXQGLQJ DW WKH UHJLRQDO OHYHO................................................................................
ii. Co-investment with private investors in innovative enterprises....................................................
iii. Financing for collaboration between private and public enterprises ............................................
c. Sharing of existing information on innovation and technologies .....................................................
d. Coordination with other regional initiatives......................................................................................
H. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................101
EPILOGUE .......................................................................................................... 105
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 108
ANNEX I .......................................................................................................... 117
ANNEX II .......................................................................................................... 119
List of boxes
%R[ $ EULHI KLVWRU RI 6RXWK6RXWK FRRSHUDWLRQ..........................................................................................
%R[ 7KH ƅLQJ JHHVH KSRWKHVLV ................................................................................................................
%R[ 'HFRXSOLQJ DQG UHYHUVH FRXSOLQJ ........................................................................................................
%R[ )', LQ H[WUDFWLYH LQGXVWULHV DQG WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ ......................................................................
Box 2.2: Manufacturing value added and technological learning .....................................................................
%R[ *OREDO SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV LQ WKH WUDGH OLWHUDWXUH .............................................................................
%R[ ,QWHUƄUP FROODERUDWLRQ LQ KHDOWK FDUH DQG ELRWHFKQRORJ....................................................................
%R[ 5LVLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK RIƄFLDO GHYHORSPHQW DVVLVWDQFH..........................................................................
%R[ 7KH IRXUFRXQWU FRWWRQ SURMHFW .........................................................................................................
%R[ 3URMHFW IRU WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI ULFH FXOWXUH........................................................................................
%R[ )LRFUX]0R]DPELTXH $59 SURGXFWLRQ IDFLOLW.....................................................................................
%R[ ,QGLDpV UHFHQW LQLWLDWLYHV IRU WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQ.......................................................................
%R[ RRSHUDWLRQ EHWZHHQ KLQD DQG 6RXWK $IULFD LQ DJULFXOWXUH .............................................................
%R[ 7KH 0H[LFRKLOH )XQG ....................................................................................................................
%R[ %5,6 $FWLRQ 3ODQ WR HQKDQFH WHFKQRORJ FRRSHUDWLRQ DQG LQQRYDWLRQ LQ DJULFXOWXUH ........................ 60
%R[ ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQV ZLWKLQ $6($1 ...........................................................
%R[ 7HFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ DQG QDWLRQDO VVWHPV RI LQQRYDWLRQ.................................................................
%R[ 7DLORULQJ ,35 UHJLPHV WR ORFDO GHYHORSPHQWDO QHHGV WKH FDVH RI -DSDQ .............................................
%R[ 8WLOLW PRGHOV LPSOHPHQWHG LQ WKH 5HSXEOLF RI .RUHD DQG 7DLZDQ 3URYLQFH RI KLQD...........................
%R[ ,QGXVWULDO SROLF DQG ,35V KLQDpV H[SHULHQFH ...................................................................................
%R[ 8VH RI SROLF LQVWUXPHQWV IRU WHFKQRORJLFDO DOOLDQFHV LQ (DVW $VLD....................................................... 88
%R[ 7KH ,QGXV 7RZHUV MRLQW YHQWXUH ..........................................................................................................
%R[ 0DMRU LQWHUQDWLRQDO GHEDWHV RQ WHFKQRORJ WUDQVIHU............................................................................
%R[ )', DQG WKH FDWFKXS SURFHVV LQ WKH 5HSXEOLF RI .RUHD.....................................................................
%R[ 1DWLRQDO LQQRYDWLRQ SROLF IUDPHZRUNV ..............................................................................................
%R[ ,QQRYDWLRQ IXQGV LQ %UD]LO DQG KLOH ..................................................................................................
%R[ 'LIIHUHQW NLQGV RI SXEOLF SURFXUHPHQW ..............................................................................................
%R[ 7KH ,QWUDNRP(ULFVVRQ DOOLDQFH .........................................................................................................
40. .......................
)LJXUH (YROXWLRQ RI WUDGH RI GLIIHUHQW UHJLRQV ZLWK WKH 6RXWK DV D VKDUH RI WKHLU WRWDOWUDGH t ...........
)LJXUH (YROXWLRQ RI WUDGH RI GLIIHUHQW UHJLRQV ZLWK WKH 1RUWK DV D VKDUH RI WKHLU WRWDO WUDGH t
3HU FHQW
45. ...............
)LJXUH ,PSRUWV RI FDSLWDO JRRGV ZLWK KLJK WHFKQRORJ LQWHQVLW E GHYHORSHG
DQG GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DV D SHUFHQWDJH RI WRWDO JOREDO LPSRUWV
46. t ................................
)LJXUH ,PSRUWV RI FDSLWDO JRRGV ZLWK KLJK WHFKQRORJ LQWHQVLW DV D SHUFHQWDJH RI WRWDO
LPSRUWV IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV E VHOHFWHG UHJLRQV t.................................................
)LJXUH ,PSRUWV RI FDSLWDO JRRGV ZLWK PHGLXP WHFKQRORJ LQWHQVLW E GHYHORSHG
DQG GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DV D SHUFHQWDJH RI WRWDO JOREDO LPSRUWV
47. t ................................ 28
Figure 2.6: Imports of capital goods with medium technology intensity as a percentage of total
LPSRUWV IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV E VHOHFWHG UHJLRQV t................................................. 28
)LJXUH ([SRUWV RI KLJKWHFKQRORJ PDQXIDFWXUHV E FRXQWULHV t PLOOLRQ
48. ..................................
)LJXUH ,PSRUWV SHU FDSLWD RI PDFKLQHU DQG WUDQVSRUW HTXLSPHQW E GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
DQG /'V t .....................................................................................................................
)LJXUH 6KDUH RI )', RXWƅRZV E GHYHORSLQJ DQG GHYHORSHG FRXQWULHV LQ WRWDO JOREDO
)', RXWƅRZV t 3HU FHQW
54. x TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
List of tables
7DEOH 5HDO *'3 JURZWK UDWHV t...................................................................................................
7DEOH (YROXWLRQ RI WUDGH E UHJLRQ DQG 3HUFHQWDJH RI WRWDO WUDGH
55. .............................................. 8
7DEOH (YROXWLRQ RI WUDGH RI VHOHFWHG GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DQG ................................................... 8
7DEOH 5HJLRQDO VKDUH RI LPSRUWV RI FDSLWDO JRRGV DV SDUW RI WRWDO LPSRUWV
67. AEC African Economic Community
$59 DQWLUHWURYLUDO
ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations
AU African Union
%5,6 %UD]LO 5XVVLDQ )HGHUDWLRQ ,QGLD KLQD DQG 6RXWK $IULFD
$1 RPPXQLW RI $QGHDQ 1DWLRQV RPXQLGDG $QGLQD GH 1DFLRQHV
77. xiiiOVERVIEW
OVERVIEW
I. SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION IS
BECOMING INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT
$V PRUH DQG PRUH GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV HPEDUN RQ
the process of industrial catch-up, it is expected that
the new growth poles will increasingly contribute to a
changing dynamics in international relations. A process
WKDW EHJDQ ZLWK WKH UDSLG LQGXVWULDOL]DWLRQ RI WKH ƄUVW
DQG WKH VHFRQGWLHU (DVW $VLDQ HFRQRPLHV LQ WKH V
DQG V
has been followed by accelerated industrial
growth in a newer set of what are often referred to as
HPHUJLQJ FRXQWULHV t ,QGLD KLQD %UD]LO DQG 6RXWK $I-
rica. This ongoing but punctuated process is expected
WR FRQWLQXH ZLWK DGGLWLRQDO FRXQWULHV VXFK DV 1LJHULD
DQG (JSW
78. H[SHULHQFLQJ VLPLODU JURZWK LQ WKH IXWXUH
Economic expansion and growth in these countries is
attributable to several important and interrelated factors:
their growing capabilities in manufacturing and services,
JUHDWHU LQYHVWPHQWV LQ WHFKQRORJLHV DQG HIƄFLHQW XVH RI
RSSRUWXQLWLHV DULVLQJ IURP JOREDOL]DWLRQ ,Q DGGLWLRQ ULVLQJ
per capita incomes and concomitant growth of domestic
demand have further boosted their growth performance.
The steady economic growth of these countries has
translated into an increase in South-South cooperation in
trade, investment and technology over the past two dec-
DGHV HQDEOLQJ WKHP WR EHFRPH VLJQLƄFDQW JOREDO WUDGLQJ
partners with other developing countries in the 2000s.
2QJRLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK FRRSHUDWLRQ LV QRW UHVWULFWHG WR
economic factors alone. Some developing countries,
along with their strengthening economic clout, are con-
tributing towards reshaping global trade, aid and eco-
QRPLF UHODWLRQV 7KLV LV SDUWO UHƅHFWHG LQ WKHLU LQFUHDVLQJ
contributions to development cooperation and assis-
tance. Recent studies estimate that development assis-
tance by developing countries has been growing stead-
LO DPRXQWLQJ WR ELOOLRQ LQ 2('
79. 2
These developments point towards the emergence of
a new paradigm for international development, which
could extend the existing boundaries of engagement to
LQFOXGH WKRVH GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV t SDUWLFXODUO OHDVW
GHYHORSHG FRXQWULHV /'V
80. t WKDW DUH FXUUHQWO PDUJLQ-
DOL]HG LQ WKH JOREDO HFRQRPLF VVWHP
1. Greater South-South cooperation could
EHQHƂW DOO GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
Rising South-South trade and investment trends have
been viewed positively as a signal that some developing
FRXQWULHV FRXOG SURYLGH D VLJQLƄFDQW LPSHWXV WR JURZWK
LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV 7KH OLWHUDWXUH LGHQWLƄHV WZR PDLQ
aspects of cooperation among developing countries.
First, such cooperation would help the South to decou-
ple from the global cyclical trends of growth, thereby
promoting a new form of stability in the global economic
system. Second, since the emerging countries are still
in their development phase, they are better placed to
understand the problems of development, particularly
in the current global context, and could provide a new
model of cooperation and technical assistance in relation
for developing countries.
Moreover, growing South-South cooperation carries with
it the promise that it could be channelled into address-
LQJ VSHFLƄF GHYHORSPHQW JRDOV 5HDOLVLQJ WKH IXOO SRWHQ-
WLDO RI 6RXWK6RXWK FRRSHUDWLRQ ZLOO UHTXLUH VLJQLƄFDQW
changes in the way the global economy is governed, to
PDNH LW PRUH GHYHORSPHQWRULHQWHG :DV DQG PHDQV
to achieve this will also need to be fully explored through
policies and practices at the national and regional levels.
$JDLQVW WKLV EDFNJURXQG WKLV Technology and Innovation
Report – TIR 2012 t DUJXHV WKDW WKH WLPH LV ULSH WR PRYH
beyond analysing current trends in South-South trade
DQG LQYHVWPHQW 6SHFLƄFDOO LW LV LPSRUWDQW WR FRQVLGHU
how and to what extent South-South cooperation could
help developing countries overcome certain obstacles
to economic expansion and growth in order to achieve
VSHFLƄF GHYHORSPHQW JRDOV 2QH VXFK JRDO ZKLFK FRQ-
tinues to elude the global community, is to bridge the
WHFKQRORJLFDO GLYLGH VR DV WR SURPRWH LQGXVWULDOL]DWLRQ
and inclusive growth across the developing world.
2. The South can complement the North
LQ SURPRWLQJ WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ
DQG LQQRYDWLRQ FDSDFLW
7HFKQRORJ DQG LQQRYDWLRQ DUH ERWK GLIƄFXOW WR DVVHVV
within economic transactions, and there is no single in-
dicator that measures them holistically. A long history
of empirical research has uncovered a number of inter-
national factors shaping the process of technological
FKDQJH DQG SURGXFWLYLW JURZWK 2QH IDFWRU WKDW LV D VLJ-
QLƄFDQW FRQWULEXWRU WR WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ DQG FDSDFL-
ty-building is the import of capital goods. Participation in
JOREDO SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV *31V
81. t DQG LQ FXVWRPHU
VXSSOLHUUHWDLOHU UHODWLRQVKLSV LQ WKHVH QHWZRUNV t DORQJ
ZLWK IRUHLJQ GLUHFW LQYHVWPHQW )',
83. xiv TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
WLHV WKURXJK WHFKQRORJLFDO VSLOORYHUV WR ORFDO ƄUPV HLWKHU
directly through licensing and technology transfer, or in-
GLUHFWO WKURXJK WDFLW NQRZKRZ DFFXPXODWLRQ E ORFDO
personnel. These are often supported by other means
such as copying, interacting with foreign clients on de-
VLJQ VWDQGDUGV DQG TXDOLW UHTXLUHPHQWV DQG FROODERUD-
tion in joint ventures.
The impact of these channels on the building of capabili-
ties depends on the presence of some level of absorptive
capacity within countries. But since institutions in many
GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV SDUWLFXODUO /'V WHQG WR EH ZHDN
WKH DUH OLNHO WR EH FKDOOHQJHG LQ WKHLU TXHVW WR XVH 6RXWK
South trade and investment to build their technological
capabilities and promote activities leading to structural
FKDQJH DQG GLYHUVLƄFDWLRQ RI WKHLU HFRQRPLHV
In order to overcome these limitations proactive policies
are needed at various levels of South-South exchange.
Emerging countries have used a variety of measures to
overcome barriers to trade and intellectual property rights
,35
84. SURWHFWLRQ LQ WKHLU RZQ HFRQRPLF GHYHORSPHQW
which can provide important lessons for other develop-
ing countries. Their successful experiences show not only
how technological capabilities can be built, but also what
policy measures could potentially be used to promote
national development in the context of the existing multi-
lateral trade regime. The similarity of their developmental
experiences is important, deriving from their past path-
dependent constraints on promoting sustainable devel-
opment.
Sharing of experiences amongst developing countries
and strengthening their collaboration remains essential
and relevant for countries that are still grappling with
ways to create harmonious and coherent local innova-
WLRQ DQG LQGXVWULDO SROLF HQYLURQPHQWV 5HFRJQL]LQJ WKLV
both policy and scholarly analyses have begun to give
greater attention to what lessons can be drawn from
experiences of emerging countries for development in
general, and the process of capabilities building, in par-
ticular.
A second and perhaps more appropriate advantage of
developing countries for fostering technological learning
in the South is that most of them have followed similar
pathways in building their capabilities: from reverse engi-
neering to incrementally innovating in products and pro-
FHVVHV WR LQFUHDVHG UHVHDUFK DQG GHYHORSPHQW 5 '
85. and operating at the technological frontier itself. Even in
the developing countries that can be termed as emerg-
ing, while there are a number of industries that are at
the technological frontier globally, many other industries
RU ƄUPV IDFH URXWLQH FRQVWUDLQWV RQ LQQRYDWLRQ VLPLODU WR
those prevailing in other developing countries, including
/'V 7KLV LPSOLHV WKDW WR YDULQJ H[WHQWV WKHVH FRXQ-
tries are still confronted with some basic issues relating
to promoting the technological absorptive capacities of
their systems as a whole.
The similarity of many of these challenges to innovation
lends support to the view that the technologies produced
by developing countries may often be much more acces-
VLEOH t DQG FRQWH[WXDOO DSSURSULDWH t WR RWKHU GHYHORSLQJ
FRXQWULHV DQG ƄUPV WKXV KLJKOLJKWLQJ WKH LPSRUWDQFH RI
promoting greater South-South collaboration in this area.
Collaboration on technology and innovation is perhaps
one of the most critical components of South-South soli-
darity, offering a real promise of sustainable development
throughout the developing world. However, because such
FROODERUDWLRQ VWLOO WDNHV SODFH EHWZHHQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQ-
tries at very different levels of development, it necessarily
involves some pressures as well as opportunities for many
developing countries. Pressures include conforming with
FHUWDLQ UHTXLUHPHQWV LPSRVHG E YDULRXV DJUHHPHQWV RQ
LQWHUQDWLRQDO WUDGH DQG ,35 UHJLPHV DPRQJ RWKHUV VXFK
as obligations relating to climate change mitigation and
adaptation, the transition towards a green economy, and
,35V SURWHFWLRQ
86. ZKLOH HQVXULQJ LQFOXVLYH DQG VXVWDLQDEOH
industrial development.
7HFKQRORJ DQG LQQRYDWLRQEDVHG
FROODERUDWLRQ PD QRW EH DXWRPDWLF
Given the potential of South-South cooperation to pro-
mote technological learning, there is clearly a renewed
LQWHUHVW LQ WKLV DUHD .H SROLF FRQVLGHUDWLRQV LQFOXGH
how ongoing South-South cooperation could be orient-
ed to foster technological and innovation capacity, and
how the technology needs of all developing countries
DQG /'V FRXOG EH LQWHJUDWHG LQWR D EDODQFHG DJHQGD
of cooperation and exchange.
In the classical development economics discourse, eco-
QRPLF JURZWK LV FRQVLGHUHG WR EH D SURFHVV RI PRELOL]-
ing and combining complementary factors to shift the
production structure of economies and extend the pro-
duction frontier. Those factors are capital accumulation,
WHFKQRORJLFDO FKDQJH DQG HFRQRPLF GLYHUVLƄFDWLRQ ,Q
the context of developing countries, however, economic
growth, on the one hand, and technology and innova-
tion capacity on the other have a mutually reinforcing
relationship. Technology and innovation capacity play an
LPSRUWDQW UROH LQ ERRVWLQJ HFRQRPLF JURZWK RI WKH NLQG
that results from changes in the structure of production.
Economic growth often enables technological learning
and greater sophistication, and at the same time, tech-
nological capabilities are critical for ensuring that growth
is of a productive nature and can be steadily maintained.
87. xvOVERVIEW
+RZHYHU WKHVH PXWXDOO VXSSRUWLYH OLQNDJHV GR QRW
emerge spontaneously. Particularly, in the context of
South-South exchanges, while there is potential for con-
tinued growth of trade and investment that can result in
technological learning, much still needs to be done to
harness that potential. )LUPV VHHNLQJ WR H[SDQG WKURXJK
D VHDUFK IRU QHZHU PDUNHWV DQG HFRQRPLHV RI VFRSH
and scale may have only limited incentives to engage
LQ FROODERUDWLRQV MRLQW YHQWXUHV ZLWK KRVWFRXQWU ƄUPV
7KHVH LQFHQWLYHV DUH XVXDOO PDUNHWEDVHG GHSHQGLQJ
RQ WKH VSHFLƄF DWWULEXWHV RI WKH KRVW FRXQWU ƄUPV WKDW
PDNH WKHP DWWUDFWLYH SDUWQHUV 7KLV FRXOG LQFOXGH WKHLU
H[WHQVLYH PDUNHWLQJ DQG GLVWULEXWLRQ QHWZRUNV LQ WKH
KRVW FRXQWULHV RU WKHLU VSHFLƄF 5 ' FDSDELOLWLHV RU WHFK-
nological expertise, or their ability to produce particular
SURGXFWV FRPSHWLWLYHO +RZHYHU VXFK PDUNHWUHODWHG
LQFHQWLYHV RQO HQWLFH ƄUPV WR HQWHU LQWR DOOLDQFHV ZLWK
ƄUPV LQ KRVW FRXQWULHV WKDW KDYH VRPH OHYHO RI H[SHUWLVH
as demonstrated by the value addition they create in re-
turn. Relying on such incentives for technological learn-
LQJ LV PLVOHDGLQJ VLQFH WKH DUH QRW VXIƄFLHQW WR HQWLFH
ƄUPV RQ WKHLU RZQ WR HQWHU LQWR WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ
alliances with partners who have little or low levels of
technological expertise.
0RUHRYHU GHVSLWH WKH VLJQLƄFDQFH RI WKHVH LVVXHV WKH
literature on South-South technological cooperation is
TXLWH VFDUFH DQG JHQHUDOO IRFXVHV RQ KRZ SUHVVLQJ
international challenges, such as public health and cli-
mate change, can be addressed through cooperation
amongst developing countries. The analysis tends to
be rather general, and data on issues of technological
change and innovation capacity are scarce or not easily
DYDLODEOH 7KLV 5HSRUW VHHNV WR ƄOO WKLV JDS DQG DLPV WR
contribute new policy insights in this complex area.
The Report argues that the similarity of development ex-
SHULHQFHV RI WKH FRXQWULHV RI WKH 6RXWK SDUWLFXODUO LQ
SURPRWLQJ LQQRYDWLRQ FDSDFLW
88. DQG WKH FRQWH[WXDO DS-
SURSULDWHQHVV RI WKHLU WHFKQRORJLHV PDNHV WKHP HVVHQ-
tial complements to existing North-South interactions.
The central message of TIR 2012 is that developing
countries, particularly emerging countries, can be im-
portant partners for promoting technological capabilities
in the South, and therefore analysing how South-South
collaboration for technology and innovation can be pro-
moted in a systematic way to promote inclusive sustain-
able development should be a priority.
Hence, the Report focuses on whether South-South
exchanges could lead to building technological capabili-
ties, and under what circumstances. From an analysis of
the current patterns of South-South exchanges on tech-
QRORJ DQG LQQRYDWLRQ LVVXHV WKH 5HSRUW VHHNV WR LGHQ-
WLI NH LVVXHV LQ WKLV DUHD DQG GHULYH EHVW SUDFWLFHV IRU
moving forward in fostering South-South collaboration
on technology and innovation.
II. A RICH LANDSCAPE OF SOUTH-SOUTH
EXCHANGE IS EMERGING
The growing economic and commercial interests of
VRPH GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV KDYH EHHQ IXHOOLQJ PDUNHW
expansion and some level of technological collaboration
ZLWK RWKHU GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV :LWKLQ WKHVH WUDQVDF-
tions, imports of capital goods and growing participation
LQ *31V PD KHOS ORFDO ƄUPV DFFXPXODWH NQRZOHGJH
not only relating to technical aspects of production, but
DOVR WR PDQDJHULDO EXVLQHVV DQG TXDOLWUHODWHG DVSHFWV
)', DQG OLFHQVLQJ FDQ DOVR KDYH LPSRUWDQW LPSOLFDWLRQV
IRU WHFKQRORJ DFTXLVLWLRQ DQG OHDUQLQJ LQ VRPH FRQ-
texts. However, to what extent this holds, and whether
economic growth in the South and the resulting rise in
South-South trade and investment do indeed contribute
to greater technological learning and development of in-
QRYDWLRQ FDSDFLW UHPDLQ SHUWLQHQW TXHVWLRQV IURP ERWK
WKHRUHWLFDO DQG SROLFPDNLQJ SHUVSHFWLYHV
'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DUH LQFUHDVLQJO
LPSRUWLQJ FDSLWDO JRRGV IURP WKH 6RXWK
'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV KDYH VXUSDVVHG GHYHORSHG FRXQ-
tries as major partners of other developing countries for
trade in capital goods. Capital goods imports are not
only inputs for the expanding economic activities and
consumption patterns in these countries, they also show
that developing countries, particularly emerging coun-
tries, are increasingly offering competitive products in a
variety of industries involving a range of technologies.
$YDLODEOH GDWD VKRZ WKDW WKHUH KDV EHHQ D PDUNHG LQ-
crease in trade in capital goods among developing coun-
WULHV VLQFH WKH PLGV ,QGHHG RYHUDOO WUHQGV VKRZ D
clear shift away from developed countries as sources of
such goods for developing countries during the period
t HVSHFLDOO DIWHU WKH HFRQRPLF VORZGRZQ
in 2008. As part of rising South-South trade, the share
of developing countries’ imports from other developing
FRXQWULHV KDV LQFUHDVHG VWHDGLO IURP } SHU FHQW LQ
WR }SHU FHQW LQ ZKLFK LQGLFDWHV WKDW GHYHO-
oping countries have become the main sources of capi-
tal goods for other developing countries.
Growing imports of capital goods by developing coun-
tries implies the expanding capacity in the South to pro-
duce goods, at least in some countries. It also shows
that imports of these goods by other developing coun-
tries are on the rise as part of their increasing efforts
to promote productive capacity. As noted earlier, such
imports are important for building productive capacity,
since they can result in the transfer of technology to the
89. xvi TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
extent that the imported goods are studied for design
characteristics and reverse engineering. They can also
directly improve productivity when they are employed in
production processes. The impact of imports of capital
goods in terms of enhancing productivity in developing
FRXQWULHV LV UHƅHFWHG LQ SDUW E WKH LQFUHDVLQJ VKDUH RI
manufacturing exports from developing countries as a
whole, a large part of which is also sourced to other de-
veloping countries.
:LWKLQ WKHVH EURDG WUHQGV WKHUH KDV EHHQ D FRQVLVWHQW
increase in imports of high-technology-intensive goods
E GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV $ FORVHU ORRN DW WKH JURZLQJ
technological intensity of South-South imports shows
WKDW RQ DYHUDJH RYHU }SHU FHQW RI DOO KLJKWHFKQRORJ
products imported by developing countries as a group
ZDV VRXUFHG IURP RWKHU GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LQ
RPSDULQJ WKH OHYHO RI WHFKQRORJLFDO LQWHQVLW ORZ PH-
GLXP DQG KLJK
90. RI GHYHORSLQJFRXQWU LPSRUWV WKHUH
ZDV D ODUJHU VKDUH RI PDQXIDFWXUHG LPSRUWV RI KLJK VNLOO
DQG WHFKQRORJ LQWHQVLW WKDQ WKRVH RI PHGLXP VNLOO DQG
technology intensity. These trends strengthen the notion
that developing countries are increasingly able to export
technology-intensive goods globally, and particularly to
the South.
'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DUH LQFUHDVLQJO
SDUWLFLSDWLQJ LQ JOREDO SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV
A predominant factor explaining the rising trend in tech-
nology imports is the growth of GPNs, driven by some
of the more technologically advanced developing coun-
tries. Another factor is the increasing domestic demand
LQ VRPH RI WKH HPHUJLQJ FRXQWULHV t SDUWLFXODUO KLQD
DQG ,QGLD t GXH WR WKHLU ODUJH SRSXODWLRQV DQG WKH JURZ-
ing purchasing power of their growing middle classes,
which is leading to a surge in imports of technological
products from other countries in the South into these
economies. Many of these imports, as data trends show,
serve to meet growing demand driven by the expand-
ing economic activities and consumption patterns in
these countries. Moreover, some emerging countries are
able to manufacture several high-technology products
at competitive prices, resulting in a shift in developing-
country imports from developed countries to developing
countries.
However, these trends are uneven across regions, and
are largely explained by the existence of production
QHWZRUNV LQ FRXQWULHV LQ (DVW $VLD DQG PRUH UHFHQWO LQ
South-East Asia and South Asia. These countries have
progressed in technological sophistication as illustrated
by their ability to produce high- and medium-technology-
intensive products using advanced processes. This fur-
ther facilitates their ability to absorb newer products that
DOVR HPERG KLJK VNLOOV DQG WHFKQRORJ LQWHQVLW PXFK
EHWWHU WKDQ VRPH RI WKH RWKHU UHJLRQV VKRZQ LQ WDEOH
such as Southern Africa. Similar trends can be observed
with respect to medium-technology-intensive imports.
Generally, a country can import capital goods so long as
it can pay for them. However, what remains important for
productivity growth is how these imports are channelled
effectively into generating future income. This relates to
KRZ ƄUPV DQG VHFWRUV DUH DEOH WR DGDSW DQG XVH WHFK-
nologies embodied in these imports to generate produc-
tivity growth. So long as this is possible and evident, it
would lead to the conclusion that such imports of capital
goods are contributing to building technological capabili-
WLHV LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV 2Q WKLV DVSHFW WZR WUHQGV
stand out.
First, developing countries that already have a minimum
level of technological capabilities are engaging in exten-
sive trade in capital goods with other countries of the
South. This points to the importance of some level of
technological capabilities to participate in capital goods
trade, underscoring the fact that while any country can
import capital goods, those that consistently participate
in trade in such goods use many of these imports to
enhance their production capacities.
The second trend,
ZKLFK WR VRPH H[WHQW VXSSRUWV WKH ƄUVW LV WKDW WKHUH LV
D VLJQLƄFDQW RYHUODS EHWZHHQ FRXQWULHV WKDW LPSRUW FDSL-
tal goods and those that export technology-intensive
goods. Hence, a sub-set of developing countries that
already possess some level of technological capabilities
are able to leverage ongoing trade and investment to fur-
ther boost their technological capabilities and innovation
capacities.
This does not completely exclude the presence and im-
portance of technological transactions in other countries
of the South. But it points to an important result that
PDQ DUH OLPLWHG E WKH VPDOOHU VL]H RI WKHLU PDUNHWV
lower ability to pay and the lower technological intensity
of their overall economic activity.
7UHQGV LQ LPSRUWV RI PDFKLQHU DQG WUDQVSRUW HTXLSPHQW
show a widening gap among developing countries, con-
ƄUPLQJ WKH RYHUDOO WUHQGV SUHVHQWHG KHUH UHJDUGLQJ WKH
WHFKQRORJLFDO FDSDFLW RI FRXQWULHV 'HYHORSLQJ FRXQ-
tries as a group increased their imports of machinery
DQG WUDQVSRUW HTXLSPHQW DV D VKDUH RI JOREDO LPSRUWV RI
WKLV FDWHJRU IURP }SHU FHQW LQ WR }SHU FHQW LQ
+RZHYHU FRXQWULHV ZLWK ORZHU WHFKQRORJLFDO FD-
SDFLWLHV VXFK DV D ODUJH QXPEHU RI /'V LQFUHDVHG WKH
VKDUH RI WKHLU LPSRUWV RI WKLV FDWHJRU IURP RQO }SHU
FHQW LQ WR }SHU FHQW LQ ZKLFK LV PXFK
lower than that of other developing countries.
Among
WKH /'V WKHUH DUH IXUWKHU YDULDWLRQV ZLWK WKH RLOH[SRUW-
91. xviiOVERVIEW
LQJ /'V ODUJHO DFFRXQWLQJ IRU WKH LQFUHDVH LQ WKHVH LP-
ports, showing that such imports are biased towards the
FRPPRGLW VHFWRUV LQ WKH RLO H[SRUWLQJ /'V
6RXWK6RXWK )', KDV EHHQ ULVLQJ
)', E GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV KDV EHHQ ULVLQJ LQ UHFHQW
years, increasing the possibilities for it to be leveraged
for technological learning in various other develop-
ing countries. The importance of developing countries
DV VRXUFHV RI )', KDV LQFUHDVHG TXLWH VLJQLƄFDQWO DQG
steadily over the past four decades,6
although it declined
VRPHZKDW LQ IROORZLQJ WKH HUXSWLRQ RI WKH ƄQDQFLDO
and economic crisis. The share of developing countries
LQ WRWDO RXWZDUG )', URVH IURP }SHU FHQW LQ IURP
ELOOLRQ
93. EXW
SUHOLPLQDU HVWLPDWHV IRU LQGLFDWH WKDW LW PD KDYH
GHFOLQHG WR }SHU FHQW IRU WKH HDU
The analysis of
6RXWK6RXWK )', OHDGV WR WKH IROORZLQJ PDLQ REVHUYD-
tions:
t $OWKRXJK WKHUH KDV EHHQ D VXEVWDQWLDO ULVH LQ
6RXWK6RXWK )', WKHUH DUH VLJQLƄFDQW UHJLRQDO
YDULDWLRQV LQ RXWZDUG )', ZKLFK KDYH DQ LPSDFW RQ
WKH VKDUH RI JURVV Ƅ[HG FDSLWDO IRUPDWLRQ LQ FRXQ-
WULHV (DVW $VLD DFFRXQWV IRU PRVW RI WKH )', RXW-
ƅRZV IURP WKH 6RXWK IROORZHG FORVHO E 6RXWK
(DVW $VLD DQG /DWLQ $PHULFD
t 2YHU WKH SDVW WZR GHFDGHV WKH VHFWRUDO FRPSRVL-
WLRQ RI RXWZDUG )', IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV KDV
FKDQJHG VLJQLƄFDQWO WR EH FRPSULVHG RI LQYHVW-
PHQWV LQ PDQXIDFWXULQJ DQG VHUYLFHV 2I WKLV ODUJH
shares are directed at other developing countries.
(VWLPDWHV LQGLFDWH WKDW LQ WKH HDUO V DOPRVW
three fourths of developing-country investments
abroad went to the manufacturing sector, which
DFFRXQWHG IRU }SHU FHQW RI VXFK )', $SDUW IURP
manufacturing, services account for a large share
RI WKH )', RXWƅRZV IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
much of which are directed at other developing
FRXQWULHV )RU LQVWDQFH GXULQJ WKH SHULRG t
VHUYLFHV DFFRXQWHG IRU QHDUO }SHU FHQW RI
VXFK )', RI ZKLFK PRUH WKDQ }SHU FHQW ZHQW WR
developing countries.
,Q VXP WRWDO )', RXWƅRZV IURP WKH 6RXWK KDV LQFUHDVHG
with a clear emphasis on the services and manufactur-
ing sectors. Such a sectoral focus would normally imply
a potential for technological learning. However, estimates
LQGLFDWH WKDW )', LQ VHFWRUV VXFK DV VHUYLFHV DQG PDQX-
facturing originates mainly from emerging countries, par-
ticularly East Asian and South-East Asian countries, and
is largely directed to those developing countries that pos-
VHVV VWURQJ SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV LQ WKHVH VHFWRUV RU KDYH
the capacity to source such investments by virtue of their
technological capabilities. This is true of a large share of
WKH VHUYLFHV )', GLUHFWHG WRZDUGV GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
)', RXWƅRZV WDUJHWLQJ HOHFWURQLFV DQG DXWRPRELOH LQGXV-
tries are also directed towards East and South-East Asia,
ZKLFK KDYH JOREDOO FRPSHWLWLYH SURGXFWLRQ KXEV 7KH )',
thus helps to cement and enhance the already existing
technological capacity of these developing countries as
SDUW RI H[LVWLQJ SURGXFWLRQ QHWZRUNV
$ ODUJH SURSRUWLRQ RI )', RXWƅRZV WR GHYHORSLQJ FRXQ-
WULHV WKDW GR QRW KDYH VLJQLƄFDQW WHFKQRORJLFDO FDSDELOL-
WLHV VXFK DV WKH UHVRXUFHULFK GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LQ-
FOXGLQJ $IULFDQ FRXQWULHV
94. JR WR WKHLU PLQLQJ DQG QDWXUDO
UHVRXUFHV LQGXVWULHV 7KLV IRUP RI )', XVXDOO GRHV QRW
have direct technological impacts.
III. THE POTENTIAL OF SOUTH-SOUTH
COOPERATION FOR TECHNOLOGICAL
LEARNING STILL NEEDS TO BE
HARNESSED
Technological change and economic growth have a mu-
tually reinforcing relationship in developing countries.
Sustainable economic growth that is built on productivity
increases in these countries does not fully rely on fron-
WLHU LQQRYDWLRQV DV LQ LQGXVWULDOL]HG FRXQWULHV EXW UDWKHU
on the possibility to learn and build upon already exist-
LQJ WHFKQRORJLHV 7KLV UHTXLUHV LQYHVWPHQW QRW RQO LQ
manufacturing, but also across a range of activities that
support overall industrial development, including in mar-
NHWLQJ PDQDJHULDO DQG ƄQDQFLDO VHUYLFHV DV ZHOO DV LQ LQ-
frastructure and learning activities. This in turn increases
absorptive capacity and the ability to adapt and apply
H[LVWLQJ WHFKQRORJLHV LQ WKH IRUP RI SURGXFWV DQG SUR-
FHVVHV
95. E PHDQV RI ORFDO LQQRYDWLRQV DQG WKXV OHDGV
to a gradual increase in productivity in all sectors. Such
growth is intrinsically tied to how production structures
HYROYH DQG ZKDW NLQGV RI IDFWRUV SROLFLHV DQG LQVWLWX-
WLRQV HQDEOH WKH GLIIXVLRQ RI WHFKQRORJLFDO NQRZOHGJH WR
GRPHVWLF VHFWRUV DQG ƄUPV
However, much still needs to be done in order to har-
ness this critical relationship in developing countries. For
instance, an argument that has often been advanced
is that the ongoing growth and shift in production pat-
terns in some of the emerging countries, from low-end
PDQXIDFWXULQJ WR PRUH NQRZOHGJHEDVHG GRPDLQV KDV
opened up opportunities for other developing countries,
SDUWLFXODUO /'V WR HQJDJH LQ ORZHQG PDQXIDFWXULQJ
However attractive this might be, it does not occur au-
WRPDWLFDOO 7R GHYHORS LQGXVWULDOL]DWLRQ SURFHVVHV WKDW
FRXOG OHDG WR D VLJQLƄFDQW SURSRUWLRQ RI WKH WRWDO SRSXOD-
WLRQ EHLQJ HQJDJHG LQ YDOXHDGGHG SURGXFWLRQ UHTXLUHV
investments in building absorptive capacity. This neces-
sitates a fundamental shift in the underlying conditions
96. xviii TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
of many developing countries, with a particular focus on
factors that promote technological learning and innova-
tion capabilities in those countries. Such a shift should
be consistent with their comparative advantages and lo-
cal demand. This challenge in leveraging technological
learning through ongoing economic growth processes
is demonstrated by the analysis of data and case study
evidence in TIR 2012. The conclusions that lend strength
to this observation are as follows:
t 7KH HPSLULFDO HYLGHQFH RQ RQJRLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK
technological exchange shows that the surge of
economic growth in developing countries, par-
ticularly emerging countries, has been made pos-
sible in large part by their growing technological
FDSDELOLWLHV 7KLV LV UHƅHFWHG LQ WKH LQFUHDVH LQ WKHLU
capital goods imports in recent times. Although
capital goods imports by developing countries are
growing, and are considered to be an indication of
technological learning, the trends show that a large
share of the capital goods exported and imported is
concentrated in a sub-set of developing countries.
These are countries that have some level of techno-
logical capabilities to integrate into GPNs, and their
level of economic growth enables them to import
FDSLWDO JRRGV 2Q WKH RWKHU KDQG D ODUJH QXPEHU
RI GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV SDUWLFXODUO /'V DUH QRW
major importers or exporters of capital goods.
t 7KH JURZLQJ PDQXIDFWXULQJ FDSDELOLWLHV RI D QXP-
EHU RI GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV SDUWLFXODUO %UD]LO
China, India and South Africa, has enabled them
to increase their exports of manufactured goods.
It has also enabled them to participate in GPNs in
both low-cost manufacturing and high-technology,
YDOXHDGGHG SURGXFWLRQ 0RUHRYHU JOREDOL]DWLRQ DV
well as newer technologies and the move towards
WKH NQRZOHGJH HFRQRP HVSHFLDOO LQIRUPDWLRQ DQG
FRPPXQLFDWLRQ WHFKQRORJLHV ,7V
97. KDYH SURYLGHG
opportunities for these countries to use their existing
VNLOOHG ZRUNIRUFH WR DFFXPXODWH IXUWKHU NQRZOHGJH
and promote technological learning.
t )', WUHQGV DUH VLPLODU WR WHFKQRORJLFDO HPSRZHU-
ment trends of the South, which tends to be con-
centrated in some countries, mainly East Asian
FRXQWULHV DV ZHOO DV FRXQWULHV VXFK DV %UD]LO
China and India. Emerging countries account for
WKH ODUJHVW VKDUH RI )', RXWƅRZV IURP GHYHORSLQJ
FRXQWULHV LQFOXGLQJ WKURXJK PHUJHUV DQG DFTXL-
VLWLRQV 0 $V
98. LQ WKH 6RXWK :KLOH 6RXWK6RXWK
)', RXWƅRZV DUH GLUHFWHG WR D YDULHW RI VHFWRUV
including services and health, they tend to be
FRQFHQWUDWHG LQ VSHFLƄF DFWLYLWLHV LQYROYLQJ H[-
changes among some countries in those sectors.
This shows that a few developing countries are
LQFUHDVLQJO LQYROYHG LQ PXWXDOO EHQHƄFLDO WHFKQR-
logical exchange.
t A review of case study evidence on South-South
technological collaborations conducted in the Re-
SRUW VKRZV WKDW 6RXWK6RXWK LQWHUƄUP WHFKQRO-
ogy-related initiatives seem to be motivated mainly
by economic considerations or proactive govern-
ment incentives, or both. In contrast, South-South
public sector and government-driven collaborations
are more wide-ranging in nature, but at the same
WLPH WKH IRFXV PRUH RQ VFLHQWLƄF DQG WHFKQLFDO DV-
pects rather than on technological collaboration or
ƄUPOHYHO OHDUQLQJ 7KHUH DUH DOVR D YDULHW RI JRYHUQ-
ment initiatives for promoting technology exchange
and learning, both regional and in the context of
South-South relations, including the annual sum-
PLWV RI WKH %5,6 %UD]LO WKH 5XVVLDQ )HGHUDWLRQ
,QGLD KLQD 6RXWK $IULFD
100. IRUXP +RZHYHU VXFK LQLWLDWLYHV FRXOG
better serve the needs of developing countries if
WKH VSHFLƄHG ZDV DQG PHDQV RI FROODERUDWLRQ IRU
technological capacity-building. Also, they should
be more closely coordinated with government policy
and projects within individual countries. Currently,
WKH VFLHQWLƄF DQG WHFKQLFDO DVVLVWDQFH SURJUDPPHV
conducted by national agencies are often isolated
from technological collaborations involving public
DQG SULYDWH VHFWRU RUJDQLVDWLRQV WKDW FRQGXFW MRLQW
5 ' DQG WUDLQLQJ DFWLYLWLHV LQ VSHFLƄF VFLHQWLƄF GLV-
FLSOLQHV
101. ,Q RUGHU WR EHQHƄW WKH UHFLSLHQW FRXQWULHV
these need to be properly coordinated.
t :KLOH VRPH 6RXWK6RXWK WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUD-
tion is evident, most countries are limited by the
ODFN RI LQWULQVLF WHFKQRORJLFDO FDSDELOLWLHV UHTXLUHG
WR EHQHƄW PRUH IURP RQJRLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK H[-
changes. Additionally, the South is contributing to
DQ LQFUHDVLQJ FRPPRGLW GHSHQGHQFH RI /'V
which reduces their ability to structurally diversify
WKHLU HFRQRPLHV :KLOH WKLV LV FOHDUO DQ LQFLGHQWDO
effect of the economic boom in the emerging coun-
tries, there is a need to closely align the interests of
all developing countries towards bridging the tech-
nological divide.
t 7KH DQDOVLV IXUWKHU VKRZV WKDW LQ WKH FRXQWULHV
that have been collaborating the most on technol-
ogy and innovation, supportive national innovation
environments have been contributing to building
WKHLU WHFKQRORJLFDO FDSDELOLWLHV :LWKLQ HPHUJLQJ
countries, positive developments in factors such
DV 5 ' LQYHVWPHQWV HGXFDWLRQ SDWHQWLQJ DQG
licensing trends, the number of researchers per
million people, infrastructure and ICTs are further
strengthening their innovation capabilities.
102. xixOVERVIEW
These results point to two fundamental issues. First,
ongoing South-South collaboration could potentially
provide more opportunities for developing countries,
LQFOXGLQJ /'V WR EHQHƄW WHFKQRORJLFDOO E OHYHUDJ-
ing the ongoing process of economic growth explic-
itly to promote technological change. For example, the
DQDOVLV RQ )', VKRZV WKDW GHVSLWH LWV FXUUHQW UHJLRQDO
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ 6RXWK6RXWK )', FRXOG EHFRPH PRUH
versatile in terms of its ability to be combined with ca-
pability-building approaches since it is largely concen-
trated in manufacturing and services. The rising share
RI )', IURP GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LQWR VHFWRUV VXFK DV
services also creates opportunities for technological
collaboration in these sectors, which is now currently
not being fully harnessed.
A review of ongoing initia-
tives in this area shows that there are some interest-
LQJ FDVHV RI VFLHQWLƄF DQG WHFKQLFDO FROODERUDWLRQ ERWK
public-sector-based and private-sector-led. But these
too do not seem to demonstrate the full potential of
South-South collaboration for technological learning
and innovation.
:KLOH LW FRXOG EH DUJXHG WKDW 6RXWK6RXWK WHFKQRORJL-
cal collaboration is still in its initial phases, and therefore
ODFNV FRRUGLQDWHG HIIRUWV LW VWLOO VHHPV DSSURSULDWH WR
DGGUHVV WKH NH FKDOOHQJH RI IRVWHULQJ VXFK collabo-
ration systematically. This automatically leads to the
second issue, namely, how to ensure that an ap-
propriate level of emphasis is given to this by devel-
oping-country governmental initiatives and that the
various platforms on South-South collaboration do in
fact result in greater technological learning. This calls
IRU PHDVXUHV WKDW SURPRWH FORVHU OLQNDJHV EHWZHHQ
JRYHUQPHQW DJHQGDVHWWLQJ DQG RQJRLQJ VFLHQWLƄF
and technological collaboration initiatives as well as
LQWHUƄUP WHFKQRORJLFDO DOOLDQFHV ZLWKLQ D EURDGHU
IUDPHZRUN RI 6RXWK6RXWK FROODERUDWLRQ
IV. A FRAMEWORK TO PROMOTE SOUTH-
SOUTH COLLABORATION ON TECHNOLOGY
AND INNOVATION IS NEEDED
In order to effectively address these issues, TIR 2012
SURSRVHV D VHW RI SULQFLSOHV DURXQG ZKLFK D IUDPHZRUN
of South-South collaboration for technology and inno-
YDWLRQ FDQ EH VWUXFWXUHG 6XFK D IUDPHZRUN PXVW EH
DEOH WR DGGUHVV WKH FKDOOHQJHV LGHQWLƄHG LQ WKLV 5HSRUW
To begin with, short-term objectives of trade openness
DQG WKH LPSRUWV RI LQSXWV IRU LQGXVWULDOL]DWLRQ SURFHVVHV
should be consistent with longer-term technological de-
velopment goals of the developing world as a whole. A
IUDPHZRUN RQ 6RXWK6RXWK FROODERUDWLRQ FRXOG WKHUHIRUH
help to align the interests of all developing countries in this
highly relevant area. Moreover, although technology and
NQRZOHGJH DUH NH LQSXWV WR FDWFKLQJ XS DQG FRQYHU-
JHQFH
103. SURFHVVHV WKURXJK ZKLFK GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
absorb ideas and concepts from the industrial frontier,
the accumulation of technological capabilities will not
be possible without express policy and institutional sup-
port by the international community and by the develop-
ing countries themselves. Therefore, as part of such a
IUDPHZRUN TIR 2012 proposes that developing coun-
tries strengthen their cooperation with a particular focus
on collaboration for technology and innovation. A frame-
ZRUN WKDW SURPRWHV LQWHUDFWLRQ DW WKUHH GLIIHUHQW OHYHOV LV
suggested:
t ([FKDQJH RI H[SHULHQFHV LQ SROLFPDNLQJ DQG LQ
GHYLVLQJ SROLF IUDPHZRUNV IRU WHFKQRORJ DQG LQ-
novation;
t 7HFKQRORJ H[FKDQJH DQG ƅRZV DLPHG DW LQFUHDV-
ing the technology absorptive capacity of the pri-
vate and public sectors; and
t 7UDQVIHU RI WHFKQRORJLHV LQ NH VHFWRUV RI LPSRU-
tance to public well-being, such as agriculture,
health, climate change and renewable energy.
6XFK D IUDPHZRUN IRU 6RXWK6RXWK FROODERUDWLRQ RQ
technology and innovation needs to move beyond pri-
ority setting and political declarations; it should pro-
pose a clear road map for action. The Report articu-
lates a set of principles that could form the basis for
VXFK DQ LQWHUQDWLRQDO IUDPHZRUN 7KHVH SULQFLSOHV DUH
derived from some important issues prevailing in the
context of technology and innovation exchange glob-
ally and among developing countries. These are dis-
FXVVHG EULHƅ KHUH
7KH WHFKQRORJLFDO QHHGV RI DOO GHYHORSLQJ
FRXQWULHV VKRXOG EH EHWWHU LQWHJUDWHG LQWR
RQJRLQJ 6RXWK6RXWK H[FKDQJH SULQFLSOH
104. Closing the gap between formal and informal production
structures in a large number of developing countries,
SDUWLFXODUO /'V DQG SURPRWLQJ GRPHVWLF FDSDELOLWLHV
calls for more proactive engagement in addressing their
technological needs in a coherent and dynamic way.
This form of engagement not only necessitates great-
HU LQYHVWPHQWV LQ WHUWLDU HGXFDWLRQ VNLOOV WUDLQLQJ DQG
competence-building within countries; it also needs to
EH UHLQIRUFHG E HQDEOLQJ JUHDWHU DFFHVV WR NQRZOHGJH
and technological capacity-building through, for exam-
SOH LQWHUƄUP FRRSHUDWLRQ MRLQW YHQWXUHV DQG OLFHQVLQJ
DJUHHPHQWV 6XSSRUW IRU NQRZOHGJHEDVHG DFWLYLWLHV
in developing countries is therefore essential for trans-
forming their economies towards activities that focus
on greater value addition and higher returns on invest-
ment.
105. xx TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
7KH H[SHULHQFHV RI GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LQ
EXLOGLQJ LQQRYDWLRQ FDSDELOLWLHV VKRXOG EH
VKDUHG PRUH SURDFWLYHO SULQFLSOH
106. Emerging countries have pursued a variety of industrial
and development policies and strategies to promote
technological catch-up. Innovation policies are essential
components of such strategies. Innovation policy frame-
ZRUNV FDQ EH XQGHUVWRRG DV SXUSRVLYH DFWLRQV DQG LQ-
centives provided by governments to promote interactive
learning and collaboration among all economic and non-
economic actors in the system. Such policies have been
LQVWUXPHQWDO LQ RYHUFRPLQJ PDUNHW LPSHUIHFWLRQV WKDW
obstruct technological change, and which are pervasive
and widespread, particularly in developing countries.
Sharing these policy experiences is relevant for two main
reasons. To begin with, they are useful in order to glean
general lessons and derive best practices on how de-
veloping countries can best promote economic catch-
up. Secondly, they can also be highly instructive in de-
ULYLQJ SROLF RSWLRQV IRU SURPRWLQJ OLQNDJHV EHWZHHQ
YDULRXV DVSHFWV RI LQQRYDWLRQ IUDPHZRUNV :KHUHDV DOO
measures will not be applicable in all countries univer-
sally, sharing these experiences would provide an array
of policy options for developing countries that could be
SXUVXHG IRU LQYHVWPHQW SURPRWLRQ OLQNLQJ ,35 SURWHF-
WLRQ WR LQQRYDWLRQ SROLF OLQNLQJ HQWHUSULVH GHYHORSPHQW
with innovation policy, and coordinating research be-
tween universities and industry, among others.
/HDUQLQJ QHHGV WR EH SURPRWHG WKURXJK
6RXWK6RXWK DOOLDQFHV DQG WHFKQRORJ
WUDQVIHU SULQFLSOH
107. A critical shift in South-South collaboration on technol-
ogy and innovation is needed, with a focus on promot-
ing technological learning based on the South’s own rich
and diverse experiences, as highlighted in the Report.
Some of the means of such learning, such as technology
transfer, have been demanded by developing countries
in the international discourse for decades. Technologi-
cal development implies more than just promoting the
LPSRUW RI WHFKQRORJLHV WKURXJK )', RU WUDGH LQ FDSLWDO
goods. As mentioned above, what is more crucial is the
EXLOGLQJ RI FDSDELOLWLHV WKURXJK VNLOOV GHYHORSPHQW DQG
WKH WUDQVIHU RI RSHUDWLRQ DQG PDLQWHQDQFH NQRZKRZ
which promotes technological progress.
Mechanisms for technological collaboration have tradi-
tionally focused on a North-South dimension, but there
are also opportunities to develop South-South mecha-
nisms for the sharing of experiences on technological
capacity-building and transfer. Indeed, these could
be particularly appropriate in the developing-country
context, given that these countries share common
development challenges. Such mechanisms could
complement ongoing efforts to foster North-South
technology transfer by placing an explicit emphasis
on technological learning and building local capacities
IRU LQQRYDWLRQ 2QH VXFK PHFKDQLVP LV WKH FUHDWLRQ RI
strategic technological alliances between some devel-
oping countries, particularly the emerging countries
on the one hand, and other developing countries, on
the other, to promote learning in sectors that already
have some level of domestic technological capabilities.
7HFKQRORJ WUDQVIHU DQG WKH VKDULQJ RI WDFLW NQRZKRZ
is another instrument that the South could use to pio-
neer different solutions by leading by example.
)', QHHGV WR EH PRUH WHFKQRORJRULHQWHG
LQ RUGHU WR VXSSRUW WKH EXLOGLQJ RI
WHFKQRORJLFDO FDSDELOLWLHV SULQFLSOH
108. 0DQ FRXQWULHV KDYH OHYHUDJHG )', WR SURPRWH WKH DE-
sorption of technologies and building of innovation ca-
SDFLW 7KH 5HSXEOLF RI .RUHD LV DQ H[DPSOH RI D FRXQWU
WKDW KDV VRXJKW WR XVH )', DV D VRXUFH RI WHFKQRORJ
within its overall industrial development strategy. There
DUH LQVWDQFHV ZKHUH 6RXWK6RXWK )', KDV KDG SRVLWLYH
results in terms of building national technological capa-
bilities. Interesting examples of how governments have
SURPRWHG WKH WUDQVIHU RI WDFLW NQRZKRZ E WKH IRUHLJQ
LQYHVWLQJ ƄUP WR D ORFDO SDUWQHU DUH WKRVH RI 8JDQGD DQG
Ethiopia.
7KHVH FDVHV VKRZ WKDW )', FDQ EH FRPELQHG
with a variety of other policy measures. However, on a
general scale, there is often a disjunction between inno-
YDWLRQ SROLFLHV DQG )', SROLFLHV LQ FRXQWULHV 7KLV GLVMXQF-
tion needs to be addressed through an innovation policy
IUDPHZRUN WKDW DOORZV UHFLSLHQW FRXQWULHV WR UHDOL]H WKH
SRWHQWLDO RI )', IRU WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ
'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV VKRXOG SRRO
WHFKQRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHV WR DGGUHVV
FRPPRQ FKDOOHQJHV SULQFLSOH
109. There are a range of development challenges that con-
front all countries of the South to varying degrees. They
need technological innovations and platforms that pro-
mote a smoother transition towards a green economy,
help address climate change mitigation and adaptation,
encourage the use of sustainable energy and renewable
energy technologies, as well as help improve public health
and food security. For all these technological challenges,
common responses could be forged.
,Q DOO WKHVH DUHDV WKH OHYHO RI GRPHVWLF ƄUPVp FDSDELOLWLHV
LQ PDQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LV LQVXIƄFLHQW WR VXSSRUW
the creation of conventional forms of technological alli-
ances. Therefore, there is a need for new alliances that
HQDEOH WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI SDUWLFXODU NLQGV RI WHFKQRO-
ogies that are of critical importance to the developing
110. xxiOVERVIEW
ZRUOG 'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV FRXOG DOVR KHOS WKH VKDULQJ
RI DOUHDG H[LVWLQJ NQRZOHGJH LQ LPSRUWDQW VHFWRUV DQG
industries, which until now has not been systematic. In-
stead, there is a continued reliance on North-South ex-
FKDQJHV LQ ƄQGLQJ WHFKQRORJLFDO VROXWLRQV
Not only are developing countries’ experiences in build-
ing innovation capacity particularly relevant for bridging
the technological divide, their technologies are also often
more locally adaptable in other developing countries, in-
FOXGLQJ /'V RZLQJ WR VLPLODU FRQWH[WV DQG KHQFH WKH
are more appropriate for those countries.
V. EXPLICIT POLICIES ARE REQUIRED TO
SUPPORT THE EMERGENCE OF SUCH
A COLLABORATIVE FRAMEWORK
Current discussions on technology and innovation in
the international context often revolve around how in-
ternational commitments for technology dissemination
and transfer can be fostered.
:LWKLQ VHYHUDO RI WKHVH
GLVFXVVLRQV VXFK DV WKRVH UHODWHG WR $UWLFOH
111. RI
the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual
3URSHUW 5LJKWV WKH 75,36 $JUHHPHQW
112. FRQVHQVXV VWLOO
QHHGV WR EH UHDFKHG RQ GHƄQLQJ DQG PHDVXULQJ WHFKQRO-
RJ WUDQVIHU :KLOH WKHVH GLVFXVVLRQV UHPDLQ LPSRUWDQW
from an overall global perspective, this Report articulates
a number of policy measures that could be implemented
at the national, regional and international levels in order
WR RSHUDWLRQDOL]H WKH SULQFLSOHV RXWOLQHG DERYH
7KH SROLF PHDVXUHV LGHQWLƄHG E WKLV 5HSRUW DUH QRW
exhaustive, but help to show the way forward. Moreo-
ver, they should not be construed as binding developing
countries, particularly emerging countries, to exacting
technological commitments. The policy measures sug-
gested here are meant to facilitate South-South tech-
nological collaboration through long-term-oriented in-
stitutions in all developing countries, whether they act
DV VXSSOLHUV RU UHFLSLHQWV RI WHFKQRORJLFDO NQRZOHGJH LQ
collaborative ventures.
ORVHO OLQN QDWLRQDO LQQRYDWLRQ SROLFLHV
WR 6RXWK6RXWK LQLWLDWLYHV
1DWLRQDO LQQRYDWLRQ SROLF IUDPHZRUNV FRXOG EH DFFRP-
panied by the following policy measures specially aimed
at encouraging South-South collaboration for technol-
ogy and innovation.
D RRUGLQDWH ORFDO DQG UHJLRQDO LQQRYDWLRQ
SROLFLHV ZLWK 6RXWK6RXWK LQLWLDWLYHV
There is often a disconnect between national and region-
al policies on technology and innovation. Furthermore,
since some developing countries have only recently
HPHUJHG DV VLJQLƄFDQW VRXUFHV RI WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ
many existing policy instruments do not expressly refer
to South-South collaboration in this area. This needs to
be revised in policy setting exercises, both at the national
DQG UHJLRQDO OHYHOV WR UHƅHFW WKH QHZ UHDOLW UHFRJQL]LQJ
developing countries as long-term partners in techno-
logical capacity-building.
$V SDUW RI WKLV LQQRYDWLRQ SROLF IUDPHZRUNV DW WKH QD-
tional and regional levels need to be revised to incor-
SRUDWH FHUWDLQ NH LQQRYDWLRQ SULRULWLHV LQ 6RXWK6RXWK
transactions. A range of policy measures could be imple-
mented to expressly promote South-South technological
collaboration, including, but not necessarily restricted to:
u /LQNLQJ GHYHORSLQJFRXQWU )', ZLWK FOHDUO DU-
WLFXODWHG WHFKQRORJ DQG WDFLW NQRZKRZ UHTXLUH-
ments;
— Providing/using existing government funding to
SURPRWH VFLHQWLƄF DQG WHFKQLFDO FROODERUDWLRQV IRU
SULRULW VHFWRUV EHWZHHQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV LQ
WKHLU UHJLRQ RU HYHQ RXWVLGH WKH UHJLRQ
113. — Granting special incentives and tax reductions to
ORFDO ƄUPV LQ UHWXUQ IRU HQWHULQJ LQWR MRLQW YHQWXUHV
RU MRLQW SURGXFWLRQ DUUDQJHPHQWV ZLWK ƄUPV IURP
developing countries, with a particular emphasis
RQ DFTXLULQJ WHFKQRORJLHV
u 2IIHULQJ LQFHQWLYHV WR IRUHLJQ ƄUPV IURP GHYHORSLQJ
countries, particularly emerging countries, such as
special tax cuts or government procurement as-
surances, in return for setting up production facili-
WLHV DQG WUDQVIHUULQJ NQRZKRZ WR ORFDO ƄUPV
— Providing technology incubation facilities to sup-
port new technology applications in local industry
ZLWK KHOS IURP ƄUPV LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV SDU-
ticularly emerging countries.
E 3URYLGH LQFHQWLYHV IRU VKLIWLQJ WRZDUGV
KLJKHU YDOXHDGGHG DFWLYLWLHV
,Q RUGHU WR PLQLPL]H WKH ULVN RI ORFDO ƄUPV UHPDLQLQJ DW
lower ends of GPNs with few or no chances of moving
up the value-added stages of production, there is a need
for explicit policy measures that support engagement in
higher value-added activities. Higher value-added activi-
ties in this context are closely associated with, but not
identical to, manufacturing although this sector is cer-
tainly essential for driving structural transformation. The
notion of higher value-added should also encompass
greater social value added through innovation activities,
which essentially relate to ensuring that innovation ac-
WLYLWLHV UHVSRQG WR ORFDO QHHGV DQG DOVR IRVWHU HTXLWDEOH
and inclusive development and are pro-poor. Innovation
funds, both at the national and sectoral levels, could help
to induce such a shift towards increased value added,
particularly in countries rich in natural resources.
114. xxii TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION REPORT 2012
F )RFXV RQ WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ LQ SROLFLHV RI
HPHUJLQJ FRXQWULHV
In order to ensure that technological learning is an essential
component of South-South interactions, emerging coun-
tries could introduce policy measures that help to increase
WKH IRFXV RQ FROODERUDWLRQV LQ PXWXDOO EHQHƄFLDO WHFKQROR-
JLHV DQG LQQRYDWLRQ 7KHVH FRXOG WDNH WKH IROORZLQJ IRUPV
— Adopting policies that promote technological en-
gagement with other developing countries from a
long-term perspective; and
u 3URYLGLQJ DGGLWLRQDO LQFHQWLYHV WR QDWLRQDO ƄUPV WR
engage in technological exchange and the build-
LQJ RI WDFLW NQRZKRZ LQ ƄUPV LQ RWKHU GHYHORSLQJ
countries.
$GRSW SROLFLHV WKDW SURPRWH D ORQJWHUP
WHFKQRORJLFDO RULHQWDWLRQ
The overall technological development of the South is a
FRPPRQ JRRG WKDW ZLOO KDYH SRVLWLYH QHWZRUN HIIHFWV IRU
all developing countries and their policy strategies need
WR UHƅHFW WKLV 7KHLU ORQJWHUP YLVLRQ DQG VWUDWHJ VKRXOG
Box 1: Institutional features of the proposed South-South Innovation and Technology Pact (SITEP)
The SITEP would support technological learning and innovation capacity across all developing countries by providing institutional
VXSSRUW DW WKUHH GLIIHUHQW OHYHOV WKURXJK D YDULHW RI SROLF LQVWUXPHQWV $W HDFK RI WKH OHYHOV LQVWLWXWLRQDO VXSSRUW FRXOG WDNH WKH
following forms.
L
115. 3URPRWH WHFKQRORJLFDO OHDUQLQJ DW WKH ƄUP OHYHO
A number of developing countries, in particular emerging countries, are increasingly producing new, state-of-the-art technologies.
0DQ RI WKHVH HIIRUWV DUH EHLQJ ƄQDQFHG E SXEOLF LQYHVWPHQW 7KUHH LQVWUXPHQWV FRXOG SDUWLFXODUO DGYDQFH DFFHVV WR DQG
SURGXFWLRQ RI VXFK NQRZOHGJH
t 3RROLQJ SXEOLF LQYHVWPHQW IRU EDVLF 5 ' 6XFK D PHFKDQLVP ZRXOG SRRO WRJHWKHU SXEOLF LQYHVWPHQW IRU EDVLF 5 ' DFURVV
GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV WKDW VHHN WR MRLQ KDQGV DV D PHDQV RI SURPRWLQJ ERWK WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI GRPHVWLF OHDUQLQJ FDSDELOLWLHV
DV ZHOO DV OLQNDJHV DQG LQWHUDFWLRQV DPRQJ DFWRUV LQ LQQRYDWLRQ VVWHPV DFURVV WKHPVHOYHV 7KLV FRXOG EH GRQH DW D UHJLRQDO
level, or amongst countries that choose to partner across regions.
t 6RXWK6RXWK UHVHDUFK DQG SURGXFW GHYHORSPHQW KXEV 5HJLRQDO 5 ' IDFLOLWLHV WR FUHDWH DQG VXVWDLQ 5 ' ZLWKLQ ƄUPV RU
WKRVH ZKLFK SURYLGH 5 ' VHUYLFHV RQ D SDDVRXJR EDVLV FRXOG FRQVWLWXWH DQ LPSRUWDQW VKRUW DQG PHGLXPWHUP VROXWLRQ
to some of the major problems faced by public and private sectors in developing countries.
t 6RXWK6RXWK SRROLQJ RI VXSSO DQG GHPDQG $ PDMRU LPSHGLPHQW WR PDQ WHFKQRORJLFDO LQQRYDWLRQV LV WKH OLPLWHG RU ODFN RI
ORFDOUHJLRQDO PDUNHW GHPDQG 7KLV LV SDUWLFXODUO WUXH LQ LQGXVWULHV ZKHUH WHFKQRORJLFDO LQQRYDWLRQV DUH LQYHVWPHQWLQWHQVLYH
DQG ULVN VXFK DV LQ KHDOWK WHFKQRORJLHV 7KLV PHFKDQLVP ZRXOG ƄOO WKDW JDS E SRROLQJ GHPDQG UHJLRQDOO RU DFURVV OLNH
minded countries that have similar needs within the South.
LL
116. 3URPRWH HQWHUSULVH GHYHORSPHQW DQG ƄQDQFLQJ RI VSHFLƄF LQQRYDWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV WKDW DUH RI SDUWLFXODU LPSRUWDQFH WR
GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV DV D ZKROH
The proposed SITEP would have a second set of policy instruments and activities that are directly geared to alleviating many of
WKH FRQVWUDLQWV IDFHG DW WKH HQWHUSULVH OHYHO LQFOXGLQJ ƄQDQFLQJ WKDW FRXOG WDNH YDULRXV IRUPV DV GLVFXVVHG EHORZ
t 9HQWXUH FDSLWDO IXQGLQJ DW WKH UHJLRQDO OHYHO (PHUJLQJ HQWHUSULVHV LQ /'V WKDW VKRZ SURPLVH LQ NH VHFWRUV RI UHJLRQDO
importance, such as pharmaceuticals, agro-processing and ICTs, could be provided with venture capital funding. Such
IXQGLQJ SURJUDPPHV FRXOG RIIHU DZDUGV WKURXJK FRQWHVWV IRU SDUWLFLSDWLQJ UHJLRQDO ƄUPV
t RLQYHVWPHQW ZLWK SULYDWH LQYHVWRUV LQ LQQRYDWLYH HQWHUSULVHV $ QXPEHU RI VFKHPHV FRXOG EH ODXQFKHG DW WKH UHJLRQDO OHYHO
IRU WKH GHYHORSPHQW RI HDUOVWDJH LQQRYDWLYH WHFKQRORJLHV E ORFDO ƄUPV $FTXLVLWLRQ RI WHFKQRORJLFDO NQRZKRZ FRXOG EH
supported through public-private/private-private partnerships between various developing countries.
t )LQDQFLQJ IRU FROODERUDWLRQ EHWZHHQ SULYDWH DQG SXEOLF HQWHUSULVHV 6XFK DQ LQVWUXPHQW FRXOG H[SUHVVO DGGUHVV WKH ODFN RI
LQFHQWLYHV DW WKH QDWLRQDOVHFWRUDO OHYHOV LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV VR DV WR HQDEOH FROODERUDWLYH OLQNDJHV
(iii)Act as a platform for sharing innovation experiences and promoting policy learning.
'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV FRXOG EHQHƄW HQRUPRXVO IURP EXLOGLQJ D FRPPRQ IRUXP IRU H[FKDQJH RI LQIRUPDWLRQ DERXW WKHLU QDWLRQDO
technology and innovation policies. Such a forum would enable the sharing of experiences on how countries could promote
industrial development within the parameters of the international trade and IPR regimes. The forum would provide a venue for
GLVFXVVLRQV RQ WKH RSWLRQV DQG ƅH[LELOLWLHV WKDW DUH VWLOO FXUUHQWO DYDLODEOH XQGHU WKH H[LVWLQJ LQWHUQDWLRQDO UXOHV ZKLFK RYHUDOO FDQ
often be restrictive.
The SITEP could be augmented by regional initiatives directly aimed at building innovation capacity at the regional level.
6RXUFH 817$'
117. xxiii
contain clear targets and milestones to be achieved in
terms of technological collaboration.
D $GRSW SROLFLHV WKDW OLQN WHFKQLFDO DQG
VFLHQWLƂF FRRSHUDWLRQ ZLWK WHFKQRORJLFDO
collaboration
As the Report shows, although many developing coun-
tries are actively engaged in expanding their technical
DQG GHYHORSPHQW DVVLVWDQFH DFWLYLWLHV WKHUH LV D ODFN
RI FRRUGLQDWLRQ EHWZHHQ VFLHQWLƄF DQG WHFKQLFDO FRO-
laboration provided by their agencies and the ongoing
WHFKQRORJLFDO FROODERUDWLRQV EHWZHHQ ƄUPV ,Q RUGHU WR
ensure the best results, these activities should be better
coordinated by means of a clear policy on South-South
technological collaboration set out by the governments.
Emerging countries, in particular, need to articulate long-
term strategic objectives as suggested in the aforemen-
tioned section.
E 3URYLGH LQFHQWLYHV WR ƂUPV IRU WHFKQRORJLFDO
FROODERUDWLRQ DQG WHFKQRORJ WUDQVIHU
Emerging countries could provide greater incentives for
technological collaboration and transfer of technology
ZLWKLQ WKHLU SROLF IUDPHZRUNV 7KHVH LQFHQWLYHV FRXOG
WDNH WKH IROORZLQJ IRUPV
7D[ FRQFHVVLRQV WR HPHUJLQJFRXQWU ƄUPV LQ UHWXUQ
for entering into or attracting joint ventures or joint pro-
GXFWLRQ DUUDQJHPHQWV ZLWK ƄUPV LQ GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
SDUWLFXODUO /'V
*UDQW ORFDO ƄUPV VSHFLDO qGHYHORSPHQWIULHQGOr FHUWLƄ-
cates as a goodwill gesture. These can add to the cor-
SRUDWH LPDJH RI WKH ƄUPV DQG KHOS WKHP WR GHYHORS D
customer base across the South.
2SHUDWLRQDOL]H WKH 6RXWK6RXWK ,QQRYDWLRQ DQG
7HFKQRORJ 3DFW 6,7(3
118. In order to facilitate a common, development response
to these issues, this Report suggests the pooling of tech-
nological resources by developing countries through a
comprehensive South-South Innovation and Technology
3DFW 6,7(3
119. 7KH SURSRVHG SDFW ZRXOG EH D PHFKD-
QLVP WKDW VHHNV WR FRRUGLQDWH DQG SURPRWH D GHYHORS-
ing-country response to technology-related issues. The
SITEP should provide institutional support at three levels.
To begin with, it could promote technological learning
DW WKH ƄUP OHYHO DV DQ HVVHQWLDO FRPSOHPHQW WR RQJRLQJ
6RXWK6RXWK VFLHQWLƄF FRRSHUDWLRQ DQG WHFKQLFDO DVVLV-
tance programmes. At a second level, it could promote
HQWHUSULVH GHYHORSPHQW DQG ƄQDQFLQJ RI VSHFLƄF LQQR-
vation activities that are of particular importance to de-
veloping countries. Finally, it could act as a platform for
sharing innovation experiences and promoting learning
DW WKH SROLFPDNLQJ OHYHO ER[
120. Given the similarity of developing countries’ innovation
experiences and their technological strengths, the Report
UHFRJQL]HV WKHVH FRXQWULHV DV QDWXUDO VWUDWHJLF SDUWQHUV
with each other in efforts to bridge the technological di-
YLGH )XUWKHULQJ WKLV UROH UHTXLUHV FUHDWLQJ WKH ULJKW EDVLV
for accessing science, technology and innovation re-
sources within the developing world. The technology and
LQQRYDWLRQ UHVRXUFHV RI WKH 6RXWK ZLOO EH FULWLFDO IRU OLQN-
LQJ ƄUPV DQG RUJDQL]DWLRQV DFURVV GHYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV
SDUWLFXODUO /'V ZLWK WKH JOREDO NQRZOHGJH HFRQRP
to accelerate their development processes. This needs
WR EH EDVHG RQ DQ XQGHUVWDQGLQJ WKDW D
121. LQQRYDWLRQ LV D
multidirectional, highly interactive process that integrates
RU qDUWLFXODWHVr VFLHQFH WHFKQRORJ DQG SURGXFWLRQ DQG
E
122. QHZ SROLF WKLQNLQJ LV QHHGHG WR KHOS HVWDEOLVK YLUWX-
ous circles of rising productivity, technological progress
and structural transformation across the entire develop-
ing world.
******
There are many outstanding issues concerning tech-
nological learning and innovation capacity in the con-
text of developing countries, including those related to
technology transfer, which need to be addressed at the
LQWHUQDWLRQDO OHYHO 'HYHORSLQJ FRXQWULHV FDQ OHDG WKH
ZD E ZRUNLQJ WRJHWKHU DQG SURYLGLQJ FRQVWUXFWLYH
solutions to these unresolved policy challenges in the
coming years.
OVERVIEW
*HQHYD 2FWREHU 6XSDFKDL 3DQLWFKSDNGL
6HFUHWDU*HQHUDO RI WKH 817$'