SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 41
EDELMAN'S 13TH ANNUAL SURVEY, LARGEST GLOBAL EXPLORATION OF TRUST
2
MARKET COMPARISONS
Developed: US, UK, France, Germany and Japan
Emerged: Brazil, Mexico, Russia, India and China
GLOBAL
ONLINE SURVEY
IN 26 COUNTRIES
• 31,000+ respondents
• 5 years in 20+ markets
• 8 years in 10+ markets
GENERAL
POPULATION
• 1000 respondents per
country surveyed
• Ages 18+
• 2 years of data
INFORMED
PUBLICS
• 500 respondents in U.S. and
China & 200 in other
countries
• Ages 25-64
• College-educated
• In top 25% of household
income per age group in
each country
• Report significant media
consumption and
engagement in business
news and public policy
• 13 years of data
2013
RISING INFLUENCEOF NGOS2001
FALL OF THE CELEBRITY CEO2002
EARNEDMEDIA MORE CREDIBLETHAN ADVERTISING2003
U.S. COMPANIES IN EUROPE SUFFERTRUSTDISCOUNT2004
TRUST SHIFTS FROM “AUTHORITIES”TO PEERS2005
“A PERSONLIKE ME” EMERGESAS CREDIBLESPOKESPERSON2006
BUSINESS MORE TRUSTEDTHAN GOVERNMENTAND MEDIA2007
YOUNG INFLUENCERSHAVE MORE TRUSTIN BUSINESS2008
BUSINESS MUSTPARTNERWITH GOVERNMENTTO REGAINTRUST2009
TRUST IS NOW AN ESSENTIALLINE OF BUSINESS2010
RISE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES2011
THE FALL OF GOVERNMENT2012
CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP
EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER IN RETROSPECT
3
TRUST 2013
FINANCIAL AND BANKING INDUSTRY DEEP DIVE
THE PATH FORWARD
CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP
THE STATE OF TRUST
4
STATE OF TRUST
GLOBAL 57
China 80
Singapore 76
India 71
Mexico 68
Hong Kong 67
UAE 66
Malaysia 64
Canada 62
Indonesia 62
U.S. 59
Netherlands 59
Brazil 55
Germany 55
France 54
Sweden 54
UK 53
Italy 51
Australia 50
Poland 48
S. Korea 47
Ireland 46
Argentina 45
Spain 42
Turkey 42
Japan 41
Russia 36
2011 20132012
DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL
GLOBAL 51
China 76
UAE 68
Singapore 67
India 65
Indonesia 63
Mexico 63
Netherlands 61
Hong Kong 61
Canada 58
Malaysia 57
Italy 56
Argentina 54
Australia 53
Brazil 51
Sweden 49
U.S. 49
South Korea 44
Poland 44
U.K. 41
Ireland 41
France 40
Germany 39
Spain 37
Japan 34
Russia 32
EDELMAN’S TRUST INDEX: AFTER A YEAR OF HIGH DISTRUST IN 2012,
SHIFT BACK TO NEUTRAL IN 2013
GLOBAL 55
Brazil 80
UAE 78
Indonesia 74
China 73
Netherlands 73
Mexico 69
Singapore 67
Argentina 62
India 56
Italy 56
Canada 55
South Korea 53
Sweden 52
Japan 51
Australia 51
Spain 51
France 50
Poland 49
Germany 44
U.S. 42
U.K. 40
Russia 40
Ireland 39
Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 20-country global total
6
Big Changes
from 2008
Germany +19
China +18
Canada +14
India +11
Big Changes
from 2012
Germany +16
France +14
UK +12
US +10
2013
7
GLOBAL 57
China 80
Singapore 76
India 71
Mexico 68
Hong Kong 67
UAE 66
Malaysia 64
Canada 62
Indonesia 62
U.S. 59
Netherlands 59
Brazil 55
Germany 55
France 54
Sweden 54
UK 53
Italy 51
Australia 50
Poland 48
S. Korea 47
Ireland 46
Argentina 45
Spain 42
Turkey 42
Japan 41
Russia 36
GLOBAL 48
China 70
India 64
UAE 63
Singapore 63
Indonesia 61
Malaysia 61
Mexico 59
Hong Kong 54
Canada 52
Brazil 51
Netherlands 50
Argentina 48
U.S. 45
Germany 44
UK 43
S. Korea 43
Turkey 43
France 41
Italy 40
Sweden 40
Australia 39
Spain 37
Japan 35
Poland 34
Ireland 33
Russia 30
Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. General population and Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26 country global total and across 26 countries
Largest Differences between
General & Informed Publics
Poland, US, Sweden: - 14 points
Singapore, Ireland, Hong Kong,
France: - 13 points
General
Population
9 points lower
than Informed
Publics
INFORMED PUBLIC
2013GENERAL PUBLIC
DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL
LOWER TRUST AMONG GENERAL POPULATION THAN INFORMED PUBLICS
12% 14%16% 17%
Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 2 Box, Trust a greatdeal and Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64
in 20-country global total
TRUST ON THE RISE ACROSS INSTITUTIONS, BUT WEAK INTENSITY PERSISTS
TRUST A GREAT DEAL
19% 22%
15% 17%
NGOS
BUSINESS
MEDIA
GOVERNMENT
2012 2013 2012 2013
2012 2013 2012 2013
Trust Total: 43%
Trust Total: 48%
Trust Total: 53%
Trust Total: 58%
Trust Total: 52%
Trust Total: 57% Trust Total: 58%
Trust Total: 63%
TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS
8
52%
53%
54%
57%
59%
54%
61%
44%
48% 46%
45%
46%
47%
55%
52%
51%
49%
53%
53%
47%
56%
40%
43%
44%
46%
49%
38%
46%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
NGOs Media Business Government
MOST INSTITUTIONS SEE RETURN TO 2011 HIGHS;
GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT NEARLY AS WIDE AS IN 2007
TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64
Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 35-64in 18-country global total (excludes
Argentina, Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Indonesia, Singapore, Turkey and UAE)9
2007
12 point gap
between business &
government trust
2013
10 point gap between
business &
government trust
Back to
2011 highs
59%
82%
64%
49%
74%
56%
81%
44%
56%
52%
44%
40%
62%
56%
47% 48%
63%
58%
48%
61% 60%
77%
44%
58%
65%
74%
31%
50%
41%
33%
19%
47%
30%
57%
20%
35%
32% 32%
29%
53%
47%
40%
43%
60%
58%
48%
62% 63%
82%
49%
65%
73%
81%
44%
Q11-14.[Businessin General and Government in General] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a
9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust)Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26-country
global total and across 26 countries
BUSINESS TRUSTED MORE THAN GOVERNMENT IN
16 OF 26 MARKETS SURVEYED
TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT
Government
Business
GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT GROWING
Globally, largest gap since 2007*
Trust in Government
62% of markets surveyed have
trust score below 50%
Trust in Business
35% of markets surveyed have
trust score below 50%
10
SOUTH KOREA
+13 POINTS
JAPAN
+20 POINTS
INDONESIA
+27 POINTS
Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Spain, Ireland,
Russia, Poland, Italy, South Korea, India, Japan and Indonesia
BRAZIL
+31 POINTS
ARGENTINA
+30 POINTS
RUSSIA
+11 POINTSIRELAND
+12 POINTS
POLAND
+26 POINTS
SPAIN
+24 POINTS
ITALY
+21 POINTS
TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT – HEAT MAP
MEXICO
+41 POINTS
TRUST BUSINESS OVER
GOVERNMENT
TRUST GOVERNMENT
OVER BUSINESS
11
6%
11%
31%
17%
33%
LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL
TRANSPARENCY ISSUES
POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE
WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING POLICIES
CORRUPTION OR FRAUD
16%
16%
16%
23%
27%
LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL
TRANSPARENCY ISSUES
POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE
WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING BUSINESS
DECISIONS
CORRUPTION OR FRAUD
CORRUPTION/FRAUD IS A KEY REASON FOR DISTRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT,
INCOMPETENCE IS A LEADING FACTOR FOR GOVERNMENT
REASONS FOR DECREASED BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT TRUST
(AMONG THOSE WHO REPORTED TRUSTING BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENT LESS OVER THE PAST YEAR)
Q22. [ASK IF TRUST GOVERNMENTLESS IN Q18]Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in government decreased over the last year?; Q24.[ASK IF TRUST BUSINESS
LESS IN Q20]Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in business decreased over the last year? General Population in 26-country global total
REASONS FOR TRUSTING
GOVERNMENT LESS
REASONS FOR TRUSTING
BUSINESS LESS
50% 50%
12
Technology #1 in all
markets surveyed*
SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, FINANCIAL SERVICES AND BANKS REMAIN
LEAST TRUSTED
TRUST IN INDUSTRIES
20132012
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 20 -country global total (excludes
Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Turkey and UAE) (only industries tracked from 2012to 2013included in analysis)13
77%
69%
66%
65%
62%
62%
59%
58%
53%
50%
50%
Technology
Automotive
Food and beverage
Consumer packaged
goods
Telecommunications
Brewing and spirits
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Media
Banks
Financial services45%
47%
51%
53%
56%
59%
60%
62%
64%
66%
79%
Financial services
Banks
Media
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Brewing and spirits
Telecommunications
Consumer packaged
goods
Food and beverage
Automotive
Technology
2013: Top 3 in Developed Markets
#1 Technology
#2 Automotive
#2 Brewing & Spirits
2013: Top 3 in Emerging Markets
#1 Technology
#2 Automotive
#3 Consumer Packaged Goods
#3 Energy
Q26-Q42. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies
headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust
them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics Ages 25-64 in 26-country global total
CANADA, GERMANY, SWEDEN HEADQUARTERED COMPANIES MOST TRUSTED –
EMERGING MARKETS STILL LAG
MOST TRUSTED NATIONAL IDENTITY FOR COMPANIES
76% 75% 74% 74%
70% 68% 68%
65%
61%
50% 48% 46%
41%
36% 35% 34%
31%
14
69%
82%
72%
78%
74%
80%
19%
58%
29%
50%
36%
60%
Q26-Q42. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies
headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you
“trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box – Trust) in Developed (includes US, UK, Germany, Japan, France) vs. Emerging Markets(includes Mexico, China, Brazil, Russia, India)
DEVELOPED COUNTRY HQS ARE GLOBALLY ACCEPTED, WHILE EMERGING
HQS HAVE HIGH TRUST DISCOUNT IN DEVELOPED MARKETS
DEVELOPED VS. EMERGING TRUST IN COMPANIES HEADQUARTERED IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES
*2008 data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total
Germany HQs Sweden HQs Canada HQs China HQs India HQs Brazil HQs
Global trust in companies headquartered in Germany,
Sweden, Canada and China has remained stable since 2008*
Developed
Emerging
15
CULTURAL DIVIDE: SMALL BUSINESS TRUSTED MOST IN WEST;
WHILE BIG BUSINESSES ON TOP IN EMERGING ECONOMIES
TRUST IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF BUSINESSES
70%
76%
70%
86%
78%
65%
55%
62%
53%
79%
55%
48%
89%
73%
GLOBAL DEVELOPED EMERGING US UK CHINA UAE
SMALL BUSINESSES
BIG BUSINESSES
Q15-17.Thinking about different types of businesses, please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you
“do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a greatdeal”. {Small Businesses or Companies; Big Businesses or Companies)(Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics
ages 25-64in 26-country global total, Developed Markets(includes US, UK, Germany, Japan, France), EmergingMarkets (includes Mexico, China, Brazil, Russia, India), US, UK, China,
UAE
16
58%
78% 79%
68%
70%
64%
66%
58%
60%
67% 66% 67%
75%
48%
65%
53%
74%
55% 54%
49%
59%
51% 53%
41%
28%
30%
63%
83% 81%
76% 76%
75% 73%
70% 69% 69% 67%
66% 66%
64%
64% 63%
63% 62% 61%
59%
57% 56% 55%
51%
46%
40%
37%
2012
2013
Q11-14.[NGOsTRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in 20 country global total (excludes Argentina,
Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) and across 26 countries
N/A
50%
NGOS REMAIN MOST TRUSTED INSTITUTION;
FOUR OUT OF FIVE MARKETS WITH HIGHEST TRUST IN APAC REGION
TRUST IN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOS)
2008 67% of markets surveyed
have a trust score above 50%
2013 88% of markets surveyed
have a trust score above 50%
17
2008 China:
48%
Q11-14.[Mediain General TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where
one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in 20 country global total (excludes
Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) and across 26 countries
N/A
50%
STEADY GROWTH IN TRUST IN MEDIA OVER TIME;
RESULT OF DIVERSIFICATION OF OPTIONS AND STRONG COVERAGE OF SCANDALS
TRUST IN MEDIA
2008 50% of markets surveyed have a
trust score 50% or above
2013 62% of markets surveyed have a
trust score 50% or above
18
52%
79%
70%
80%
65%
65%
61%
65%
42%
54%
47%
61%
61%
41%
45% 46%
57%
45%
37% 38%
49%
35%
48%
36%
43%
33%
57%
81%
79%
77%
70%
68% 66% 66%
61% 61% 60%
59% 57%
54%
51% 50%
50% 49%
47%
47% 47%
45% 45% 43%
42%
38%
26%
2012
2013
58% 58%
43% 41% 40%
51%
47%
32%
26%
30%
65%
71%
56% 58%
52%
TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
Global Developed Emerging
Q178-182.When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one
means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a greatdeal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26-country global total, Developed vs. Emerging
Markets; Age breakdown for general population in 26-country global total
MAINSTREAM MEDIA REIGNS IN DEVELOPED MARKETS,
EQUIVALENCE AMONG SOURCES IN EMERGING MARKETS
YOUTH TRUSTS, OLDER GENERATIONS DISTRUST NON-TRADITIONAL MEDIA
59%
61%
49% 47% 44%
61% 60%
48%
45% 43%
56% 56%
40%
37% 37%
54%
49%
29% 29% 31%
TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
18-29 30-44 45-64 65+
GLOBAL AGE BREAKDOWN
19
SKEPTICISM AND DISPERSION REQUIRES REPETITION
Q165. [TRACKING] Think about everything you see or hear every day about companies, whether it is positive or negative. How many times in general do you need to be
exposed to something about a specific company to believe that the information is likely to be true? (Provide Space to Insert Number) Informed Publics Ages 25-64 in 26-
country global total (excludes Don’t Know Responses)
4% ONCE (1)
14% TWICE (2)
64% THREE TO FIVE TIMES
12%
TEN OR MORE TIMES (10+)
6%
SIX TO NINE TIMES (6-9)
29%
FOUR OR FIVE TIMES (4-5)
MAJORITY NEEDS TO HEAR COMPANY INFORMATION 3-5 TIMES TO BELIEVE MESSAGES
35% THREE TIMES (3)
20
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES
DEEP DIVE
50%
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you
“do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18-country global total and across 18 markets
SEVERE DROPS IN TRUST IN BANKS OVER FIVE YEARS, 2/3 OF MARKETS NOW
BELOW 50% TRUST LEVEL
INDUSTRY SAW BOTTOM IN 2012 FOR UK/FRANCE/GERMANY, US BOTTOM WAS 2011
2013
2008
-20
-19
-25
-19
-26
-24
+ 11
22
-13
-13
-25
-11
56%
72%
83%
61%
59%
49%
67%
52%
69%
53%
63%
51%
35%
26%
56%
42%
47%
45%
35%
45%
83%
80%
71%
60%
59%
54%
49% 49%
47%
44%
38%
32% 31% 31%
23% 22%
19%
11%
US Trust in Banking Industry has doubled
over past two years, from 25% (2011) to
50% (2013) among Informed Publics 25-64.
Rating of Banks’ Performance in each of
the following (Total Excellent/Good)
Developed Emerging US UK Canada Australia China
Lending to small businesses X O X X O X 
Providing home mortgage loans X O X X  O 
Offering reasonable credit cards X O X X O X 
Trading and investing in government debt X O X X X X 
Ensuring the privacy & security of
customers' personal information O   X   
Overseeing initial public offerings for
companies X X X X X X O
Trust in Banking Industry 42% 69% 50% 29% 59% 40% 80%
BANKS PERFORMANCE REPORT CARD
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRUST AND PERFORMANCE
Q151-156.Now,thinkingmore specificallyabout differentactions banks can take, how would you rate banks’ or the bankingindustry’s performance in carryingout each of the followingactions?
Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26-countryglobal totaland across 26countries (TotalExcellent/Good)in Develop markets, Emergingmarkets, US, UK, Canada, Australiaand China
23
50%+ = 
40-49% = O
<40% = X
SCORING
KEY
23%
25%
11%
6%
13%
20%
24
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE BIGGEST CAUSE OF THESE SCANDALS?
Q160.How familiarare you withthe banking/financialservices scandalsthat took place over the past year, specificallyat Barclays,J.P. Morgan and Standard Chartered? ; Q161.[ASKIF FAMILIAR
WITH BANKING/FINANCIALSERVICES SCANDALSOVER PAST YEAR(Q160=VERY/SOMEWHATFAMILIAR)]Based on the informationyou have read, seen or heard about the banking/financial
services scandals,specificallythose at Barclays,J.P. Morganand StandardChartered, what do you thinkis the BIGGESTcause of these scandals? Informed Publicsages 25-64in26-countryglobal
total
(ASKED OF RESPONDENTS WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH BANKING/FINANCIAL SERVICES SCANDALS OVER PAST YEAR – 56%GLOBALLY)
59% of causes of scandals
are internal and within
business’ control
CORPORATE CULTURE DRIVEN BY
COMPENSATION/BONUSES
CORPORATE
CORRUPTION
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CHANGES IN THE ECONOMY
BANKS ARE TOO LARGE
LACK OF REGULATION
TRUST DEFICIT IN BANKS LINKED TO CULTURE
GLOBALLY, 63% SAY BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES BEHAVIORS
ARE COMMON ACROSS ALL BUSINESS
“Make no mistake, for UBS traders the manipulation
of Libor was about getting rich,”
“As one broker told a UBS derivatives trader: ‘Mate
yur getting bloody good at this libor game ...think of
me when yur on yur yacht in monaco won’t yu’”
Q163. Based on your general knowledge of the global banking and financial crisis and events which occurred this year, do you believe that the behaviors and actions exhibited
are unique to the banking and financial services industry or are these behaviors and actions common in business, regardlessof industry? Informed Publics 25-64in 26-country
global total and across 26 countries
25
CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP
69%
67%
61%
51%
51%
50%
43%
36%
Academic or expert
Technical expert in the
company
A person like yourself
Financial or industry
analyst
NGO representative
Regular employee
CEO
Government official or
regulator
TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS
CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE
29%
38%
46%
50%
50%
65%
66%
68%
Government official or regulator
CEO
Financial or industry analyst
NGO representative
Regular employee
A person like yourself
Technical expert in the company
Academic or expert
20132012
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics
ages 25-64 in 20 country global total (excludes Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) (only spokespeople tracked from 2012to 2013included)27
59%
63%
69%
67% 68%
36%
29%
38%
49%
33%
40%
58%
47% 44% 43%
65%
60%
32%
27%
32%
42%
26%
33%
39%
30%
31%
35%
50%
49%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
An academic or expert on company issues CEO
A person like yourself Government official/regulator
Regular employee
TRUSTED SPOKESPEOPLE SOLIDIFYING RANK ORDER
CREDIBILITY OF SPOKESPEOPLE – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible
would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18 -
country global total28
50%
Q130-143. [TRACKING] (Credibility of CEOs and Government officials/regulators) Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard
information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 26 -country global total and across 26 markets (only spokespeople tracked from 2012to 2013included in analysis)
2013 CREDIBILITY OF CEOS VS. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS/REGULATORS
Government official or
regulator Credibility
CEO Credibility
29
MAJORITY OF MARKETS FIND BOTH GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS LEADERS
BELOW 50% IN THEIR CREDIBILITY RATING
Business leaders trusted less than
50% in 16 of 26 markets
Government leaders trusted less
than 50% in 21 of 26 markets
45%
52%
70%
55%
52%
73%
41%
52%
34%
36%
62%
55%
42%
22%
37%
39%
43%
27% 28%
56%
37%
34%
54%
26%
40%
35%
48%
38%
18%
36%
22%
32%
54%
23%
35%
22%
25%
54%
48%
35%
15%
31%
36%
41%
25%
27%
55%
37% 36%
56%
32%
47%
45%
60%
26%
20% 19% 18%
SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL
ISSUES
CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN
INDUSTRIES THAT ARE
EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS
MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL
DECISIONS
TELL YOU THE TRUTH,
REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX
OR UNPOPULAR IT IS
CRISIS IN LEADERSHIP – TRUST IN ETHICS AND MORALITY VERY LOW
TRUST BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS TO DO THE FOLLOWING:
15% 15% 14% 13%
SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL
ISSUES
CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN
INDUSTRIES THAT ARE
EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS
MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL
DECISIONS
TELL YOU THE TRUTH,
REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX
OR UNPOPULAR IT IS
GOVERNMENT LEADERS
30
BUSINESS LEADERS
Q144A-147A.[SPLIT SAMPLE] How much do you trust business leaders to do the following?(Top Box- Trust A great Deal) General
population across 26-countryglobal total
8%
6%
10%
20%
24%
13%
33%
38%
38%
55%
71%
41%
France
Germany
US
India
China
Global
Trust in Government
Trust Government Leaders to tell the truth
10%
13%
15%
34%
32%
18%
37%
42%
50%
68%
67%
50%
France
Germany
US
India
China
Global
Trust in Business
Trust Business Leaders to tell the Truth
LEADERSHIP TRUST GAP
GAP IN TRUST IN INSTITUTION VS. TRUST IN LEADERSHIP
Q11 -14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you 'do not trust
them at all' and nine means that you 'trust them a great deal'. Q130-143.Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? General Population
-32
-35
-34
-35
-27
-28
-47
-35
-28
-25
-29
-32
31
TRUST BUILDING
16 ATTRIBUTES TO BUILDING TRUST
COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS
LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK
TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL
PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS
INTEGRITY
TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR CRISIS
HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES
HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES
PURPOSE
OPERATIONS
DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS
HAS HIGHLY-REGARDEDAND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP
RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS
OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES
WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
ADDRESSES SOCIETY’S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS
CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
PARTNERS WITH NGOs, GOVERNMENT AND 3RD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL NEEDS
ENGAGEMENT
Edelman Trust Barometer
research reveals 16 SPECIFIC
ATTRIBUTES which build trust.
These can be grouped into
FIVE PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS
listed here in rank order of
importance.
33
HOW WE HAVE EVOLVED…NOW THE ATTRIBUTES CAN BE GROUPED
INTO 5 DISTINCT CLUSTERS
INTEGRITY (58%)
PURPOSE (47%)
OPERATIONS (39%)
PRODUCTS & SERVICES (54%)
ENGAGEMENT (59%)
Edelman Trust Barometer’s
2013 TRUST PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS
Edelman Trust Barometer’s
2008 TRUST DRIVERS*
OPERATIONS
(76%)
Reputation as a place to work (81%)
Financial performance (76%)
Respected CEO or leader (71%)
34
*Data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total
19%
28%
22%
26%
33%
23%
26%
26%
23%
24%
28%
25%
23%
24%
30%
41%
37%
38%
38%
41%
44%
47%
49%
53%
54%
57%
58%
58%
59%
61%
62%
63%
PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL
ISSUES
RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS BEST COMPANIES TO
WORK FOR OR MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES
DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS
HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP
IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS
CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN WHICH
THE COMPANY OPERATES
ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS
WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS
HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES
HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES
TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS
PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS
TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL
LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK
OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES
-22
-32
-37
-36
-33
-30
-33
-31
-27
-23
-24
-11
-15
-16
-10
-18
Q80-Q96. [TRACKING] How important is each of the following actions to building your TRUST in a company? Use a nine-point scale where one means that action is “not at all
important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Important) General Population in
26-country global total (excludes ‘Don’t Know’ responses Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they are performing on each of the following
attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing “extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing
Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in 26-country global total
TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – LARGE GAP IN EXPECTATION VS. PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS IMPORTANCE VS. COMPANY PERFORMANCE
Gap
35
Importance
Performance
Who is Trusted MOST to provide you with
credible and honest information about:
Company’s
CEO
Company’s
Employee
Passionate or
Activist
Consumer
Academic
Media
Spokesperson
A company’s employee programs, benefits & working
conditions
21% 63% 16% 13% 11%
How a company serves its customers and prioritizes
customer needs ahead of company profits
19% 30% 44% 16% 15%
A company’s situation in a time of crisis 30% 35% 18% 22% 23%
A company’s innovation efforts and new product
development
31% 31% 27% 25% 13%
How a company uses its resources and influence to
support the environment
21% 26% 34% 27% 13%
How a company supports programs that positively
impact the local community
22% 27% 35% 20% 23%
Partnerships with NGO’s and effort to address societal
issues
25% 20% 25% 23% 15%
A company’s financial earnings & operational
performance
34% 27% 23% 23% 12%
A company’s business practices, both positive & negative 23% 36% 29% 21% 15%
Accomplishments about a company’s senior leadership 35% 34% 17% 19% 19%
Q197-201(GlobalSummary).We would now like you to think about different types of information you may read, see or hear about a company. For each topic, please select which
person you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company. General Population in the 26-country global total
INFLUENCER MESSAGE MAPPING
ENGAGEMENT
INTEGRITY
PRODUCTS
OPERATIONS
PURPOSE
36
THE WAY WE WERE
37
G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N
CEO
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS
ACADEMICS
TECHNICAL EXPERTS
ELITE MEDIA
VERTICAL FLOW &
CONTROLLED INFORMATION
PYRAMID OF
INFLUENCE
“As the circle of those who decide is narrowed,
as the means of decision are centralized and the
consequences of decision become enormous,
the course of great events often rests upon the
decisions of determinable circles.”
- C. Wright Mills, 1956
THE NEW DYNAMIC: THE DIAMOND OF INFLUENCE
38
ACTION CONSUMERS
EMPLOYEES
G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N
SOCIAL
ACTIVISTS
CEO
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS
ACADEMICS
TECHNICAL EXPERTS
ELITE MEDIA
TO 2013FROM 2000
FEW MANY
DICTATE CO-CREATE
FIXED FLEXIBLE
MONOLOGUE DIALOGUE
CONTROL EMPOWERMENT
PYRAMID OF
COMMUNITY
(Horizontal)
PYRAMID OF
AUTHORITY
(Vertical)
from LICENSCE TO OPERATE
to LICENSE TO LEAD
EMBRACE THE NEW MANDATE: INCLUSIVE MANAGEMENT
PYRAMID OF
COMMUNITY
(Horizontal)
PYRAMID OF
AUTHORITY
(Vertical)
Hybrid
SocialOwned
Traditional
ACTION CONSUMERS
EMPLOYEES
G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N
SOCIAL
ACTIVISTS
CEO
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS
ACADEMICS
TECHNICAL EXPERTS
ELITE MEDIA
Search &
Content
ACTIVATE ACROSS MEDIA CLOVERLEAF, BASED IN GROUNDED LEADERSHIP
“Grounded Leadership builds legitimacy in key constituent
groups and is based in personal dynamism, empathy,
authenticity, inspirational goals and courage.”
-- Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
LESSONS FOR LEADERS
40
Observe re-ordering of authority
Old values are not sufficient
Clear opportunity for business
Trust is fragile and perceived behaviors are an anchor
On the cover credits: HSBC: REUTERS/ Bobby Yip; UBS: REUTERS/Luke MacGregor; Bob Diamond: REUTERS/ Luke MacGregor; Bo Xilai: REUTERS/ Cheryl Ravelo ; Lance
Armstrong: by Sebastian David Tingkæ r; Angela Merkel: REUTERS/ Sebastien Pirlet; Rajat Gupta: REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid; George Entwistle: Associated Press/ Rex Featu

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ResultsEdelman
 
Earned Brand 2016 - UK Results
Earned Brand 2016 - UK ResultsEarned Brand 2016 - UK Results
Earned Brand 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia ReportEdelman
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust BarometerMatthew Gain
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman.ergo GmbH
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Deutschland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse DeutschlandEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Deutschland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse DeutschlandEdelman.ergo GmbH
 
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/ArgentinaEdelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/ArgentinaPaula Herreros
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy ResultsEdelman
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ResultsEdelman
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust BarometerEdelman
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global ResultsEdelman
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil FindingsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive SummaryEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World Edelman
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
 
Earned Brand 2016 - UK Results
Earned Brand 2016 - UK ResultsEarned Brand 2016 - UK Results
Earned Brand 2016 - UK Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
 
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
2011 Australian Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2019 - UK Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Deutschland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse DeutschlandEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Deutschland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Deutschland
 
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/ArgentinaEdelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer - Consolidado Global/LatAm/Argentina
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
 

Similar a 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global

Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector ResultsEdelman
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia ResultsThe Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia ResultsEdelman Indonesia
 
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
Trust 2014   indonesia and globalTrust 2014   indonesia and global
Trust 2014 indonesia and globalEdelman Indonesia
 
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -02162014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216DJECHINA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust BarometerEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Amsterdam
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia ResultsEdelman
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Soymimarca
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 

Similar a 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global (20)

Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer South Korea
 
Asef speech 030613
Asef speech  030613Asef speech  030613
Asef speech 030613
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
 
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia ResultsThe Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
 
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
Trust 2014   indonesia and globalTrust 2014   indonesia and global
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
 
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -02162014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 

Más de Edelman APACMEA

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Edelman APACMEA
 

Más de Edelman APACMEA (20)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan
 
2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India
 
2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
 

Último

Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxdrashraf369
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners
 
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptxepilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptxMohamed Rizk Khodair
 
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxReport Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxbkling
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!ibtesaam huma
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfSreeja Cherukuru
 
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfBasic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfDivya Kanojiya
 
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptx
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptxCase Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptx
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptxNiranjan Chavan
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxGlomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by  DR KANHU CHARAN PATROApril 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by  DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by DR KANHU CHARAN PATROKanhu Charan
 
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxCOVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxBibekananda shah
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️saminamagar
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptApiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptkedirjemalharun
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Mohamed Rizk Khodair
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsMedicoseAcademics
 
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranMusic Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranTara Rajendran
 

Último (20)

Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptxPERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
PERFECT BUT PAINFUL TKR -ROLE OF SYNOVECTOMY.pptx
 
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdfLUNG TUMORS AND ITS  CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
LUNG TUMORS AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf
 
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
Wessex Health Partners Wessex Integrated Care, Population Health, Research & ...
 
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptxepilepsy and status epilepticus  for undergraduate.pptx
epilepsy and status epilepticus for undergraduate.pptx
 
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxReport Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
 
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdfBasic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
Basic principles involved in the traditional systems of medicine PDF.pdf
 
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptx
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptxCase Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptx
Case Report Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.pptx
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
 
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxGlomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
 
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by  DR KANHU CHARAN PATROApril 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by  DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
April 2024 ONCOLOGY CARTOON by DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
 
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxCOVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
 
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.pptApiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
Apiculture Chapter 1. Introduction 2.ppt
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
 
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara RajendranMusic Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
Music Therapy's Impact in Palliative Care| IAPCON2024| Dr. Tara Rajendran
 

2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global

  • 1.
  • 2. EDELMAN'S 13TH ANNUAL SURVEY, LARGEST GLOBAL EXPLORATION OF TRUST 2 MARKET COMPARISONS Developed: US, UK, France, Germany and Japan Emerged: Brazil, Mexico, Russia, India and China GLOBAL ONLINE SURVEY IN 26 COUNTRIES • 31,000+ respondents • 5 years in 20+ markets • 8 years in 10+ markets GENERAL POPULATION • 1000 respondents per country surveyed • Ages 18+ • 2 years of data INFORMED PUBLICS • 500 respondents in U.S. and China & 200 in other countries • Ages 25-64 • College-educated • In top 25% of household income per age group in each country • Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news and public policy • 13 years of data
  • 3. 2013 RISING INFLUENCEOF NGOS2001 FALL OF THE CELEBRITY CEO2002 EARNEDMEDIA MORE CREDIBLETHAN ADVERTISING2003 U.S. COMPANIES IN EUROPE SUFFERTRUSTDISCOUNT2004 TRUST SHIFTS FROM “AUTHORITIES”TO PEERS2005 “A PERSONLIKE ME” EMERGESAS CREDIBLESPOKESPERSON2006 BUSINESS MORE TRUSTEDTHAN GOVERNMENTAND MEDIA2007 YOUNG INFLUENCERSHAVE MORE TRUSTIN BUSINESS2008 BUSINESS MUSTPARTNERWITH GOVERNMENTTO REGAINTRUST2009 TRUST IS NOW AN ESSENTIALLINE OF BUSINESS2010 RISE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES2011 THE FALL OF GOVERNMENT2012 CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER IN RETROSPECT 3
  • 4. TRUST 2013 FINANCIAL AND BANKING INDUSTRY DEEP DIVE THE PATH FORWARD CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP THE STATE OF TRUST 4
  • 6. GLOBAL 57 China 80 Singapore 76 India 71 Mexico 68 Hong Kong 67 UAE 66 Malaysia 64 Canada 62 Indonesia 62 U.S. 59 Netherlands 59 Brazil 55 Germany 55 France 54 Sweden 54 UK 53 Italy 51 Australia 50 Poland 48 S. Korea 47 Ireland 46 Argentina 45 Spain 42 Turkey 42 Japan 41 Russia 36 2011 20132012 DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL GLOBAL 51 China 76 UAE 68 Singapore 67 India 65 Indonesia 63 Mexico 63 Netherlands 61 Hong Kong 61 Canada 58 Malaysia 57 Italy 56 Argentina 54 Australia 53 Brazil 51 Sweden 49 U.S. 49 South Korea 44 Poland 44 U.K. 41 Ireland 41 France 40 Germany 39 Spain 37 Japan 34 Russia 32 EDELMAN’S TRUST INDEX: AFTER A YEAR OF HIGH DISTRUST IN 2012, SHIFT BACK TO NEUTRAL IN 2013 GLOBAL 55 Brazil 80 UAE 78 Indonesia 74 China 73 Netherlands 73 Mexico 69 Singapore 67 Argentina 62 India 56 Italy 56 Canada 55 South Korea 53 Sweden 52 Japan 51 Australia 51 Spain 51 France 50 Poland 49 Germany 44 U.S. 42 U.K. 40 Russia 40 Ireland 39 Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 20-country global total 6 Big Changes from 2008 Germany +19 China +18 Canada +14 India +11 Big Changes from 2012 Germany +16 France +14 UK +12 US +10
  • 7. 2013 7 GLOBAL 57 China 80 Singapore 76 India 71 Mexico 68 Hong Kong 67 UAE 66 Malaysia 64 Canada 62 Indonesia 62 U.S. 59 Netherlands 59 Brazil 55 Germany 55 France 54 Sweden 54 UK 53 Italy 51 Australia 50 Poland 48 S. Korea 47 Ireland 46 Argentina 45 Spain 42 Turkey 42 Japan 41 Russia 36 GLOBAL 48 China 70 India 64 UAE 63 Singapore 63 Indonesia 61 Malaysia 61 Mexico 59 Hong Kong 54 Canada 52 Brazil 51 Netherlands 50 Argentina 48 U.S. 45 Germany 44 UK 43 S. Korea 43 Turkey 43 France 41 Italy 40 Sweden 40 Australia 39 Spain 37 Japan 35 Poland 34 Ireland 33 Russia 30 Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. General population and Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26 country global total and across 26 countries Largest Differences between General & Informed Publics Poland, US, Sweden: - 14 points Singapore, Ireland, Hong Kong, France: - 13 points General Population 9 points lower than Informed Publics INFORMED PUBLIC 2013GENERAL PUBLIC DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL LOWER TRUST AMONG GENERAL POPULATION THAN INFORMED PUBLICS
  • 8. 12% 14%16% 17% Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 2 Box, Trust a greatdeal and Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 20-country global total TRUST ON THE RISE ACROSS INSTITUTIONS, BUT WEAK INTENSITY PERSISTS TRUST A GREAT DEAL 19% 22% 15% 17% NGOS BUSINESS MEDIA GOVERNMENT 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Trust Total: 43% Trust Total: 48% Trust Total: 53% Trust Total: 58% Trust Total: 52% Trust Total: 57% Trust Total: 58% Trust Total: 63% TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS 8
  • 9. 52% 53% 54% 57% 59% 54% 61% 44% 48% 46% 45% 46% 47% 55% 52% 51% 49% 53% 53% 47% 56% 40% 43% 44% 46% 49% 38% 46% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 NGOs Media Business Government MOST INSTITUTIONS SEE RETURN TO 2011 HIGHS; GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT NEARLY AS WIDE AS IN 2007 TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64 Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 35-64in 18-country global total (excludes Argentina, Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Indonesia, Singapore, Turkey and UAE)9 2007 12 point gap between business & government trust 2013 10 point gap between business & government trust Back to 2011 highs
  • 10. 59% 82% 64% 49% 74% 56% 81% 44% 56% 52% 44% 40% 62% 56% 47% 48% 63% 58% 48% 61% 60% 77% 44% 58% 65% 74% 31% 50% 41% 33% 19% 47% 30% 57% 20% 35% 32% 32% 29% 53% 47% 40% 43% 60% 58% 48% 62% 63% 82% 49% 65% 73% 81% 44% Q11-14.[Businessin General and Government in General] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust)Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26-country global total and across 26 countries BUSINESS TRUSTED MORE THAN GOVERNMENT IN 16 OF 26 MARKETS SURVEYED TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT Government Business GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT GROWING Globally, largest gap since 2007* Trust in Government 62% of markets surveyed have trust score below 50% Trust in Business 35% of markets surveyed have trust score below 50% 10
  • 11. SOUTH KOREA +13 POINTS JAPAN +20 POINTS INDONESIA +27 POINTS Q11-14.[TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Spain, Ireland, Russia, Poland, Italy, South Korea, India, Japan and Indonesia BRAZIL +31 POINTS ARGENTINA +30 POINTS RUSSIA +11 POINTSIRELAND +12 POINTS POLAND +26 POINTS SPAIN +24 POINTS ITALY +21 POINTS TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT – HEAT MAP MEXICO +41 POINTS TRUST BUSINESS OVER GOVERNMENT TRUST GOVERNMENT OVER BUSINESS 11
  • 12. 6% 11% 31% 17% 33% LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL TRANSPARENCY ISSUES POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING POLICIES CORRUPTION OR FRAUD 16% 16% 16% 23% 27% LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL TRANSPARENCY ISSUES POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING BUSINESS DECISIONS CORRUPTION OR FRAUD CORRUPTION/FRAUD IS A KEY REASON FOR DISTRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT, INCOMPETENCE IS A LEADING FACTOR FOR GOVERNMENT REASONS FOR DECREASED BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT TRUST (AMONG THOSE WHO REPORTED TRUSTING BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENT LESS OVER THE PAST YEAR) Q22. [ASK IF TRUST GOVERNMENTLESS IN Q18]Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in government decreased over the last year?; Q24.[ASK IF TRUST BUSINESS LESS IN Q20]Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in business decreased over the last year? General Population in 26-country global total REASONS FOR TRUSTING GOVERNMENT LESS REASONS FOR TRUSTING BUSINESS LESS 50% 50% 12
  • 13. Technology #1 in all markets surveyed* SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, FINANCIAL SERVICES AND BANKS REMAIN LEAST TRUSTED TRUST IN INDUSTRIES 20132012 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 20 -country global total (excludes Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Turkey and UAE) (only industries tracked from 2012to 2013included in analysis)13 77% 69% 66% 65% 62% 62% 59% 58% 53% 50% 50% Technology Automotive Food and beverage Consumer packaged goods Telecommunications Brewing and spirits Energy Pharmaceuticals Media Banks Financial services45% 47% 51% 53% 56% 59% 60% 62% 64% 66% 79% Financial services Banks Media Energy Pharmaceuticals Brewing and spirits Telecommunications Consumer packaged goods Food and beverage Automotive Technology 2013: Top 3 in Developed Markets #1 Technology #2 Automotive #2 Brewing & Spirits 2013: Top 3 in Emerging Markets #1 Technology #2 Automotive #3 Consumer Packaged Goods #3 Energy
  • 14. Q26-Q42. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics Ages 25-64 in 26-country global total CANADA, GERMANY, SWEDEN HEADQUARTERED COMPANIES MOST TRUSTED – EMERGING MARKETS STILL LAG MOST TRUSTED NATIONAL IDENTITY FOR COMPANIES 76% 75% 74% 74% 70% 68% 68% 65% 61% 50% 48% 46% 41% 36% 35% 34% 31% 14
  • 15. 69% 82% 72% 78% 74% 80% 19% 58% 29% 50% 36% 60% Q26-Q42. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box – Trust) in Developed (includes US, UK, Germany, Japan, France) vs. Emerging Markets(includes Mexico, China, Brazil, Russia, India) DEVELOPED COUNTRY HQS ARE GLOBALLY ACCEPTED, WHILE EMERGING HQS HAVE HIGH TRUST DISCOUNT IN DEVELOPED MARKETS DEVELOPED VS. EMERGING TRUST IN COMPANIES HEADQUARTERED IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES *2008 data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total Germany HQs Sweden HQs Canada HQs China HQs India HQs Brazil HQs Global trust in companies headquartered in Germany, Sweden, Canada and China has remained stable since 2008* Developed Emerging 15
  • 16. CULTURAL DIVIDE: SMALL BUSINESS TRUSTED MOST IN WEST; WHILE BIG BUSINESSES ON TOP IN EMERGING ECONOMIES TRUST IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF BUSINESSES 70% 76% 70% 86% 78% 65% 55% 62% 53% 79% 55% 48% 89% 73% GLOBAL DEVELOPED EMERGING US UK CHINA UAE SMALL BUSINESSES BIG BUSINESSES Q15-17.Thinking about different types of businesses, please indicate how much you trust each type of business to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a greatdeal”. {Small Businesses or Companies; Big Businesses or Companies)(Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26-country global total, Developed Markets(includes US, UK, Germany, Japan, France), EmergingMarkets (includes Mexico, China, Brazil, Russia, India), US, UK, China, UAE 16
  • 17. 58% 78% 79% 68% 70% 64% 66% 58% 60% 67% 66% 67% 75% 48% 65% 53% 74% 55% 54% 49% 59% 51% 53% 41% 28% 30% 63% 83% 81% 76% 76% 75% 73% 70% 69% 69% 67% 66% 66% 64% 64% 63% 63% 62% 61% 59% 57% 56% 55% 51% 46% 40% 37% 2012 2013 Q11-14.[NGOsTRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in 20 country global total (excludes Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) and across 26 countries N/A 50% NGOS REMAIN MOST TRUSTED INSTITUTION; FOUR OUT OF FIVE MARKETS WITH HIGHEST TRUST IN APAC REGION TRUST IN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (NGOS) 2008 67% of markets surveyed have a trust score above 50% 2013 88% of markets surveyed have a trust score above 50% 17 2008 China: 48%
  • 18. Q11-14.[Mediain General TRACKING]Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64in 20 country global total (excludes Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) and across 26 countries N/A 50% STEADY GROWTH IN TRUST IN MEDIA OVER TIME; RESULT OF DIVERSIFICATION OF OPTIONS AND STRONG COVERAGE OF SCANDALS TRUST IN MEDIA 2008 50% of markets surveyed have a trust score 50% or above 2013 62% of markets surveyed have a trust score 50% or above 18 52% 79% 70% 80% 65% 65% 61% 65% 42% 54% 47% 61% 61% 41% 45% 46% 57% 45% 37% 38% 49% 35% 48% 36% 43% 33% 57% 81% 79% 77% 70% 68% 66% 66% 61% 61% 60% 59% 57% 54% 51% 50% 50% 49% 47% 47% 47% 45% 45% 43% 42% 38% 26% 2012 2013
  • 19. 58% 58% 43% 41% 40% 51% 47% 32% 26% 30% 65% 71% 56% 58% 52% TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA Global Developed Emerging Q178-182.When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a greatdeal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26-country global total, Developed vs. Emerging Markets; Age breakdown for general population in 26-country global total MAINSTREAM MEDIA REIGNS IN DEVELOPED MARKETS, EQUIVALENCE AMONG SOURCES IN EMERGING MARKETS YOUTH TRUSTS, OLDER GENERATIONS DISTRUST NON-TRADITIONAL MEDIA 59% 61% 49% 47% 44% 61% 60% 48% 45% 43% 56% 56% 40% 37% 37% 54% 49% 29% 29% 31% TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ GLOBAL AGE BREAKDOWN 19
  • 20. SKEPTICISM AND DISPERSION REQUIRES REPETITION Q165. [TRACKING] Think about everything you see or hear every day about companies, whether it is positive or negative. How many times in general do you need to be exposed to something about a specific company to believe that the information is likely to be true? (Provide Space to Insert Number) Informed Publics Ages 25-64 in 26- country global total (excludes Don’t Know Responses) 4% ONCE (1) 14% TWICE (2) 64% THREE TO FIVE TIMES 12% TEN OR MORE TIMES (10+) 6% SIX TO NINE TIMES (6-9) 29% FOUR OR FIVE TIMES (4-5) MAJORITY NEEDS TO HEAR COMPANY INFORMATION 3-5 TIMES TO BELIEVE MESSAGES 35% THREE TIMES (3) 20
  • 21. BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES DEEP DIVE
  • 22. 50% Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18-country global total and across 18 markets SEVERE DROPS IN TRUST IN BANKS OVER FIVE YEARS, 2/3 OF MARKETS NOW BELOW 50% TRUST LEVEL INDUSTRY SAW BOTTOM IN 2012 FOR UK/FRANCE/GERMANY, US BOTTOM WAS 2011 2013 2008 -20 -19 -25 -19 -26 -24 + 11 22 -13 -13 -25 -11 56% 72% 83% 61% 59% 49% 67% 52% 69% 53% 63% 51% 35% 26% 56% 42% 47% 45% 35% 45% 83% 80% 71% 60% 59% 54% 49% 49% 47% 44% 38% 32% 31% 31% 23% 22% 19% 11% US Trust in Banking Industry has doubled over past two years, from 25% (2011) to 50% (2013) among Informed Publics 25-64.
  • 23. Rating of Banks’ Performance in each of the following (Total Excellent/Good) Developed Emerging US UK Canada Australia China Lending to small businesses X O X X O X  Providing home mortgage loans X O X X  O  Offering reasonable credit cards X O X X O X  Trading and investing in government debt X O X X X X  Ensuring the privacy & security of customers' personal information O   X    Overseeing initial public offerings for companies X X X X X X O Trust in Banking Industry 42% 69% 50% 29% 59% 40% 80% BANKS PERFORMANCE REPORT CARD RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRUST AND PERFORMANCE Q151-156.Now,thinkingmore specificallyabout differentactions banks can take, how would you rate banks’ or the bankingindustry’s performance in carryingout each of the followingactions? Informed Publics ages 25-64in 26-countryglobal totaland across 26countries (TotalExcellent/Good)in Develop markets, Emergingmarkets, US, UK, Canada, Australiaand China 23 50%+ =  40-49% = O <40% = X SCORING KEY
  • 24. 23% 25% 11% 6% 13% 20% 24 WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE BIGGEST CAUSE OF THESE SCANDALS? Q160.How familiarare you withthe banking/financialservices scandalsthat took place over the past year, specificallyat Barclays,J.P. Morgan and Standard Chartered? ; Q161.[ASKIF FAMILIAR WITH BANKING/FINANCIALSERVICES SCANDALSOVER PAST YEAR(Q160=VERY/SOMEWHATFAMILIAR)]Based on the informationyou have read, seen or heard about the banking/financial services scandals,specificallythose at Barclays,J.P. Morganand StandardChartered, what do you thinkis the BIGGESTcause of these scandals? Informed Publicsages 25-64in26-countryglobal total (ASKED OF RESPONDENTS WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH BANKING/FINANCIAL SERVICES SCANDALS OVER PAST YEAR – 56%GLOBALLY) 59% of causes of scandals are internal and within business’ control CORPORATE CULTURE DRIVEN BY COMPENSATION/BONUSES CORPORATE CORRUPTION CONFLICTS OF INTEREST CHANGES IN THE ECONOMY BANKS ARE TOO LARGE LACK OF REGULATION TRUST DEFICIT IN BANKS LINKED TO CULTURE
  • 25. GLOBALLY, 63% SAY BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES BEHAVIORS ARE COMMON ACROSS ALL BUSINESS “Make no mistake, for UBS traders the manipulation of Libor was about getting rich,” “As one broker told a UBS derivatives trader: ‘Mate yur getting bloody good at this libor game ...think of me when yur on yur yacht in monaco won’t yu’” Q163. Based on your general knowledge of the global banking and financial crisis and events which occurred this year, do you believe that the behaviors and actions exhibited are unique to the banking and financial services industry or are these behaviors and actions common in business, regardlessof industry? Informed Publics 25-64in 26-country global total and across 26 countries 25
  • 27. 69% 67% 61% 51% 51% 50% 43% 36% Academic or expert Technical expert in the company A person like yourself Financial or industry analyst NGO representative Regular employee CEO Government official or regulator TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE 29% 38% 46% 50% 50% 65% 66% 68% Government official or regulator CEO Financial or industry analyst NGO representative Regular employee A person like yourself Technical expert in the company Academic or expert 20132012 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 20 country global total (excludes Argentina, Hong Kong, Malaysia,Singapore, Turkey and UAE) (only spokespeople tracked from 2012to 2013included)27
  • 28. 59% 63% 69% 67% 68% 36% 29% 38% 49% 33% 40% 58% 47% 44% 43% 65% 60% 32% 27% 32% 42% 26% 33% 39% 30% 31% 35% 50% 49% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 An academic or expert on company issues CEO A person like yourself Government official/regulator Regular employee TRUSTED SPOKESPEOPLE SOLIDIFYING RANK ORDER CREDIBILITY OF SPOKESPEOPLE – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 35-64 in 18 - country global total28
  • 29. 50% Q130-143. [TRACKING] (Credibility of CEOs and Government officials/regulators) Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 26 -country global total and across 26 markets (only spokespeople tracked from 2012to 2013included in analysis) 2013 CREDIBILITY OF CEOS VS. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS/REGULATORS Government official or regulator Credibility CEO Credibility 29 MAJORITY OF MARKETS FIND BOTH GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS LEADERS BELOW 50% IN THEIR CREDIBILITY RATING Business leaders trusted less than 50% in 16 of 26 markets Government leaders trusted less than 50% in 21 of 26 markets 45% 52% 70% 55% 52% 73% 41% 52% 34% 36% 62% 55% 42% 22% 37% 39% 43% 27% 28% 56% 37% 34% 54% 26% 40% 35% 48% 38% 18% 36% 22% 32% 54% 23% 35% 22% 25% 54% 48% 35% 15% 31% 36% 41% 25% 27% 55% 37% 36% 56% 32% 47% 45% 60%
  • 30. 26% 20% 19% 18% SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL ISSUES CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN INDUSTRIES THAT ARE EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL DECISIONS TELL YOU THE TRUTH, REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX OR UNPOPULAR IT IS CRISIS IN LEADERSHIP – TRUST IN ETHICS AND MORALITY VERY LOW TRUST BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 15% 15% 14% 13% SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL ISSUES CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN INDUSTRIES THAT ARE EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL DECISIONS TELL YOU THE TRUTH, REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX OR UNPOPULAR IT IS GOVERNMENT LEADERS 30 BUSINESS LEADERS Q144A-147A.[SPLIT SAMPLE] How much do you trust business leaders to do the following?(Top Box- Trust A great Deal) General population across 26-countryglobal total
  • 31. 8% 6% 10% 20% 24% 13% 33% 38% 38% 55% 71% 41% France Germany US India China Global Trust in Government Trust Government Leaders to tell the truth 10% 13% 15% 34% 32% 18% 37% 42% 50% 68% 67% 50% France Germany US India China Global Trust in Business Trust Business Leaders to tell the Truth LEADERSHIP TRUST GAP GAP IN TRUST IN INSTITUTION VS. TRUST IN LEADERSHIP Q11 -14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you 'do not trust them at all' and nine means that you 'trust them a great deal'. Q130-143.Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? General Population -32 -35 -34 -35 -27 -28 -47 -35 -28 -25 -29 -32 31
  • 33. 16 ATTRIBUTES TO BUILDING TRUST COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS INTEGRITY TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR CRISIS HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES PURPOSE OPERATIONS DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS HAS HIGHLY-REGARDEDAND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES PRODUCTS & SERVICES IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT ADDRESSES SOCIETY’S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY PARTNERS WITH NGOs, GOVERNMENT AND 3RD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL NEEDS ENGAGEMENT Edelman Trust Barometer research reveals 16 SPECIFIC ATTRIBUTES which build trust. These can be grouped into FIVE PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS listed here in rank order of importance. 33
  • 34. HOW WE HAVE EVOLVED…NOW THE ATTRIBUTES CAN BE GROUPED INTO 5 DISTINCT CLUSTERS INTEGRITY (58%) PURPOSE (47%) OPERATIONS (39%) PRODUCTS & SERVICES (54%) ENGAGEMENT (59%) Edelman Trust Barometer’s 2013 TRUST PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS Edelman Trust Barometer’s 2008 TRUST DRIVERS* OPERATIONS (76%) Reputation as a place to work (81%) Financial performance (76%) Respected CEO or leader (71%) 34 *Data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total
  • 35. 19% 28% 22% 26% 33% 23% 26% 26% 23% 24% 28% 25% 23% 24% 30% 41% 37% 38% 38% 41% 44% 47% 49% 53% 54% 57% 58% 58% 59% 61% 62% 63% PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL ISSUES RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR OR MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN WHICH THE COMPANY OPERATES ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES -22 -32 -37 -36 -33 -30 -33 -31 -27 -23 -24 -11 -15 -16 -10 -18 Q80-Q96. [TRACKING] How important is each of the following actions to building your TRUST in a company? Use a nine-point scale where one means that action is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Important) General Population in 26-country global total (excludes ‘Don’t Know’ responses Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing “extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in 26-country global total TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – LARGE GAP IN EXPECTATION VS. PERFORMANCE BUSINESS IMPORTANCE VS. COMPANY PERFORMANCE Gap 35 Importance Performance
  • 36. Who is Trusted MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about: Company’s CEO Company’s Employee Passionate or Activist Consumer Academic Media Spokesperson A company’s employee programs, benefits & working conditions 21% 63% 16% 13% 11% How a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits 19% 30% 44% 16% 15% A company’s situation in a time of crisis 30% 35% 18% 22% 23% A company’s innovation efforts and new product development 31% 31% 27% 25% 13% How a company uses its resources and influence to support the environment 21% 26% 34% 27% 13% How a company supports programs that positively impact the local community 22% 27% 35% 20% 23% Partnerships with NGO’s and effort to address societal issues 25% 20% 25% 23% 15% A company’s financial earnings & operational performance 34% 27% 23% 23% 12% A company’s business practices, both positive & negative 23% 36% 29% 21% 15% Accomplishments about a company’s senior leadership 35% 34% 17% 19% 19% Q197-201(GlobalSummary).We would now like you to think about different types of information you may read, see or hear about a company. For each topic, please select which person you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company. General Population in the 26-country global total INFLUENCER MESSAGE MAPPING ENGAGEMENT INTEGRITY PRODUCTS OPERATIONS PURPOSE 36
  • 37. THE WAY WE WERE 37 G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N CEO BOARD OF DIRECTORS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACADEMICS TECHNICAL EXPERTS ELITE MEDIA VERTICAL FLOW & CONTROLLED INFORMATION PYRAMID OF INFLUENCE “As the circle of those who decide is narrowed, as the means of decision are centralized and the consequences of decision become enormous, the course of great events often rests upon the decisions of determinable circles.” - C. Wright Mills, 1956
  • 38. THE NEW DYNAMIC: THE DIAMOND OF INFLUENCE 38 ACTION CONSUMERS EMPLOYEES G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N SOCIAL ACTIVISTS CEO BOARD OF DIRECTORS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACADEMICS TECHNICAL EXPERTS ELITE MEDIA TO 2013FROM 2000 FEW MANY DICTATE CO-CREATE FIXED FLEXIBLE MONOLOGUE DIALOGUE CONTROL EMPOWERMENT PYRAMID OF COMMUNITY (Horizontal) PYRAMID OF AUTHORITY (Vertical) from LICENSCE TO OPERATE to LICENSE TO LEAD
  • 39. EMBRACE THE NEW MANDATE: INCLUSIVE MANAGEMENT PYRAMID OF COMMUNITY (Horizontal) PYRAMID OF AUTHORITY (Vertical) Hybrid SocialOwned Traditional ACTION CONSUMERS EMPLOYEES G E N E R A L P O P U L AT I O N SOCIAL ACTIVISTS CEO BOARD OF DIRECTORS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACADEMICS TECHNICAL EXPERTS ELITE MEDIA Search & Content ACTIVATE ACROSS MEDIA CLOVERLEAF, BASED IN GROUNDED LEADERSHIP “Grounded Leadership builds legitimacy in key constituent groups and is based in personal dynamism, empathy, authenticity, inspirational goals and courage.” -- Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
  • 40. LESSONS FOR LEADERS 40 Observe re-ordering of authority Old values are not sufficient Clear opportunity for business Trust is fragile and perceived behaviors are an anchor
  • 41. On the cover credits: HSBC: REUTERS/ Bobby Yip; UBS: REUTERS/Luke MacGregor; Bob Diamond: REUTERS/ Luke MacGregor; Bo Xilai: REUTERS/ Cheryl Ravelo ; Lance Armstrong: by Sebastian David Tingkæ r; Angela Merkel: REUTERS/ Sebastien Pirlet; Rajat Gupta: REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid; George Entwistle: Associated Press/ Rex Featu