Presentation given by Matt Harrison, CEO, Homeless Link, UK, at a FEANTSA seminar on "Funding strategies: Building the case for homelessness", hosted by the Committee of the Regions, June 2012
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Where to Make Savings in Homelessness Services
1. WHERE TO MAKE SAVINGS IN
HOMELESSNESS SERVICES
Matt Harrison
CEO – Homeless Link, UK
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
2. Introduction
• Homeless Link is the national membership organisation for
homelessness services in England
• We have over 500 members working with homeless people across the
country to end homelessness
• Our role is to lobby government on behalf of homeless people and our
members and to support and help them in practical ways
• We provide advice and support to them through our network of
regional managers
• These are tough times – most of our members are facing cuts and
having to make savings
• We’re not yet seeing massive closures of services, but they are
happening (4.6% of services closed in 2011/12)
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
3. Why is there a need to make
savings?
• The recession has led to an “Age of austerity”
• Massive public spending cuts in the UK
• Funding cuts to local authorities of 28% over 4 years
• Much of this being passed on to our sector
• Local authorities provide 70% of our members’ funding
• Cuts at a local level varying from 0% to 50% - in year 1
• Most of our members (58%) have been cut already by 15% on average
• Most organisations (57%) expect further cuts this year
• So far the sector has just about coped – 10 years of public investment
means we have a strong and resilient sector
• But the risks are growing…
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
4. Main areas to make savings
• Organisational changes
• Staffing
• Methods of delivery
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
5. Organisational savings
• Mergers and collaborations
• Sharing resources
• Outsourcing back-office services
• Alternative income streams – Social Enterprise
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
6. Case Study
North East
•4 small local agencies have formed a partnership to share all
their back-office functions.
•Not a merger - a collaboration
•Share IT, HR and training and finance staff
•Use staff to cover holidays and sick leave – reduce locum costs
•Now employing a Business Development Manager to bid for
contracts as a consortium
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
7. Case study
North West
• A medium sized charity has joined a large Housing Association
in a group structure.
• Retain their own independent board and business plan
• Use the larger organisation’s HR, IT, Finance and Business
Development teams
• Reduces costs, gives them more resilience and makes them
more likely to win contracts
• Some loss of independence
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
8. Case study
South West
• Medium sized charity providing hostels and other services for
homeless people
• Set up a sustainable Social Enterprise, employing service
users
• They deliver construction and services for local housing
associations (eg. clearances, redecoration and refurbishment)
• Turnover has reached £300,000 – not yet making profits for the
parent charity but growing fast.
• This is in addition to providing a route into employment
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
9. Staffing
• Typically the biggest element of a budget for our sector
• On average in the UK about 70% of total costs
• If services are to continue with lower levels of funding, then
staffing costs have to reduce
• Many organisations in the UK are reviewing and reducing
salaries and changing terms and conditions (eg. longer hours)
• Competitive tendering makes this more likely
• Fears of a “race to the bottom”
• What else can be done?
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
10. Staffing options - 1
Possible Benefits Risks Mitigating actions
response
Reduce number • Removal of less effective staff • Low morale • Staff consultation
of staff, including • Interventions can be more • Longer working hours for throughout
sharing managers focussed remaining staff • Planning with staff
across services • New creative ways of working • Fewer support hours leading to • Measuring impact of
can inspire staff and achieve more incidents and worse changes
better outcomes outcomes • Work with external partners
• Clients with high support needs
receive all attention
Employ lower • Supervisory opportunities for • Inexperience leads to more • Review JDs and PSs to
grade staff existing staff incidents ensure that the skills
• Provide placements for social • Lack of confidence among required are right
work students team • Ensure training and
supervision is in place
• Arrange external
supervision from others
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
11. Staffing options - 2
Possible Benefits Risks Mitigating actions
response
Reduce • Better rota for full-time project • Fewer professional staff at • Staff consultation
workers, increasing morale critical times • On-going review of incidents
staffing at • Increased risk of incidents and impact
night • Training for night staff
• Review risk and incident
policies
• Implement a risk register
Use of more • Increased engagement with • Inexperience • Training and support from
the community • Reduced client satisfaction volunteer agencies
volunteers • Increased client involvement • As above • Social work students
• Volunteers bring new skills • Use skilled volunteers to fill
and expertise (possibly gaps
experience of homelessness) • Be clear about what you are
• Frees up staff to do more in asking volunteers to do
depth case work
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
12. Case study
London
• A new hostel that operates more as a hotel (not for cost
reasons)
• No night staff, but a concierge service
• Just to provide security, not support
• Lower costs, and many organisations find that night staff are
not as effective as they would hope at providing support.
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
13. Case study
London
• Large provider set themselves a target to reduce their costs
• All staff had a small pay cut and a longer working week
• One layer of senior management removed
• All staff asked to feed in ideas how to make savings
• More use of sessional staff, interns, trainees and volunteers
• Outsourced IT support
• Contracts centralised and consolidated (eg. mobile phones)
• Achieved their targeted cost savings, but some impact on morale –
partly because they started first rather than waiting until everyone was
doing it.
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
14. Case study
London
•Teams of 3 floating support staff now 1 staff member, 1 trainee, 1
volunteer. The trainee is paid, the volunteer unpaid
•Both trainee and volunteers receive accredited training and a
qualification after 1-2 years
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
15. Service changes
Possible Benefits Risks Mitigating actions
response
Stop delivering • Become more efficient • Job losses • Redeploy staff to other
less crucial or • Only support those with the • Increased pressure and services
ineffective areas highest need demand on other services • Consult and measure
of your service – • Risk to clients if vital service impact of change
for example is removed throughout
serving lunch.
Engage the • Increased community • Fragmented service delivery • Joint working protocols
engagement
c • Service level agreements
• New opportunities and
o • Review policies and impact.
creative mapproaches
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK n
d
16. Case study
East Midlands
• A large hostel redeveloped with public investment
• Some self-contained units, high standard, separate entrance
• These units are part of the service while they have funding
• But could rent these units commercially to generate income to
support the rest of the service.
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
17. Case study
North East
• Floating support service working with young people
• Funding cut significantly
• Now offer initial support when young people move in
• All follow up work done by young people visiting them
• Retains contact, builds independence and responsibility and at
a lower cost
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK
18. Conclusions
• After 10 years of increased investment in services in the UK, we are
facing a sustained period of cuts
• No organisation wants to close services – especially as the recession
means demand is rising
• So we have to look to see if we can make savings in our
homelessness services.
• There are clear risks from these actions that need to considered and
mitigated.
• But the risks to our clients of closing services may be higher.
• Further reading on what’s happening in England:
http://homeless.org.uk/snap2012
WWW.HOMELESS.ORG.UK