SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 3
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Quito, Geneva, 10 February 2014
Subject: Open Letter from human rights organizations on the contradictions in
Ecuadorian human rights policy
Ambassador
Luis Gallegos Chiriboga
Representative of Ecuador before the Office and
Specialized Agencies of the United Nations Organization
Geneva, Switzerland.
Dear Ambassador,
As you and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility in Ecuador
know, the undersigning regional and international organizations have publicly
expressed support for several initiatives taken by the Ecuadorian government
regarding human rights. Specifically, those initiatives to develop a process within the
Human Rights Council that would eventually culminate in the adoption of a treaty on
human rights and business; this would represent a significant step forward that the
international community should take after adopting the “Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights” (Human Rights Council, resolution 17/4, 16 June 2011).
It is in this context that we welcome the announcement you have made in
the Regional Forum on Business and Human Rights for Latin America and the
Caribbean, held August 28th
– 30th
, 2013 in Medellín, Colombia. And later, at the 24th
session of the Human Rights Council, where as Ecuador´s representative before the
United Nations in Geneva, you made a historical declaration regarding “Transnational
Corporations and Human Rights”, which was supported by the African Group, the
Arabic Group, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Kyrgyzstan, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Venezuela
and Peru.
Over a hundred regional and international human rights organizations and
social movements welcomed this historic petition on September 13th
of last year, as
it signaled the loss of trust in voluntary mechanisms which have characterized the
debate on corporate social responsibility and facilitated the systematic impunity of
transnational corporations.
This action taken by the Ecuadorian State was ratified in the Second Forum on
Business and Human Rights, held in Geneva and convened by the working group on
the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business
enterprises on December 3rd
and 4th
.
Despite this position before the international community, we are troubled and
concerned by some decisions of the Ecuadorian government which send contradictory
messages regarding its human rights priorities. Some of these decisions are:
1.- The executive branch´s decision to dissolve the Pachamama Foundation, a
non-governmental organization whose mission has been to promote and defend
environmental and indigenous rights for over 16 years, by the express petition of the
Ministry of Internal Affairs addressed to the Ministry of the Environment, based on
the Public and State security Act, and Executive Decree no. 16, a lower-ranking legal
norm that was been subject to three public unconstitutionality actions before the
Constitutional Court and a writ of amparo before the Judiciary;
2. - The reiterated public statements made by the highest State authorities
(President, Vice-President, Chancellor, National Legal Secretary of the President) on
Ecuador´s possible “withdrawal” from the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights (IACHR). We suppose that these statements are related to a possible
“denouncement” of the American Convention on Human Rights (American
Convention), and not to an unlikely withdrawal from the Organization of American
States (OAS). Obviously, denouncing the American Convention would have complex
and serious consequences for the victims of human rights violations and the users of
the Inter-American System of Human Rights (IASHR), fostering impunity for human
rights violations and affecting the “principle of universality” which the Ecuadorian
State legitimately proclaims in regional and international forums.
3. - The decision of the Ecuadorian government to embark on and lead
together with other countries in the region a reform process of the IASHR and in
particular the IACHR, which were part of an exhaustive analytical and reform process
promoted by the General Assembly and the OAS Permanent Council for two years, a
process which concluded on March 22 of last year, in the XLIV Extraordinary General
Assembly held in Washington D.C.
This initiative included a call for three conferences of the States Parties to
the American Convention (Guayaquil, 11 March 2013; Cochabamba, 14 Mayo 2013;
and Montevideo, 22 January 2014). The agendas of these conferences were not
officially released to the OAS General Assembly or Permanent Council, the IACHR,
civil society organizations, social movements or key actors in the IASHR.
Mr. Ambassador, as you may understand, this national and international
human rights policy does not reflect the discourse rightly used by the Ecuadorian
State at the Human Rights Council, especially regarding the need of a new binding
international human rights instrument that would contribute to ending the impunity
currently enjoyed by transnational corporations in our countries. Ecuador, in
particular, is currently litigating an asymmetrical case against one of the most
powerful transnational oil companies in the world, Chevron-Texaco.
Dear Ambassador, we acknowledge Ecuador´s initiative at the Human Rights
Council, which demonstrates that Ecuador aims to strengthen human rights systems
and wishes to end impunity for human rights violations committed by the corporate
sector. Nevertheless, this action does not justify Ecuadorian policies that weaken
human rights in its territory and the Americas, which is how Ecuador has been
treating the Inter-American System of Human Rights, the Pachamama Foundation and
the Ecuadorian Amazon. We are calling on the Ecuadorian government to reconsider
its policies regarding the Inter-American System, revoke its decision on the
Pachamama Foundation, and protect the rights of indigenous people and of nature in
line with the Ecuadorian constitution.
Sincerely,
C.c.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Permanent Representative of Ecuador to the OAS
Sub-Commission on Human Rights of the European Parliament
European External Action Service
European Union Delegation in Ecuador
Ambassador of Ecuador in Brussels and Stockholm
Supporters of this letter:
Acción por la Biodiversidad
Ágora Espacio Civil, Paraguay
Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), Peru
Asociación por la Integración Latinoamericana (APILA), Chile
Bangladesh Fish Workers’ Alliance
Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas (CAOI)
Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Washington D.C.
Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales, Ecuador
Centro de Documentación en Derechos Humanos “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J. (CSMM),
Ecuador
Colectivo Pro Derechos Humanos (PRODH), Ecuador
Comité de América Latina y el Caribe para la Defensa de los Derechos de las Mujeres
(CLADEM)
Comité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos, Ecuador
Confederación de los pueblos Kichwa del Ecuador (ECUARUNARI)
Confederación Unitaria de Comerciantes Minoristas y Trabajadores Autónomos
del Ecuador
Coordinadora Nacional de Ecuatorianos en España
Ecologistas en Acción, España
Entrepueblos-Entrepobles-Herriarte-Entrepobos, España
FIAN Internacional
Franciscans International
Fundación de Culturas Indígenas Kawsay, Ecuador
Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
GRAIN
Habitat International Coalition
Human Rights Without Frontiers Int'l, Bélgica
Instituto de Estudios Políticos para América Latina y África, España
Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional de la Universidad
del País Vasco (HEGOA), España.
International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Dinamarca
Labour, Health and Human Rights Development Centre
Manitese, Italia
Pachamama, Ecuador
People's Health Movement (PHM)
Plataforma Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo (PIDHDD)
Share the World's Resources, Reino Unido
Transnational Institute, Holanda
Koepel van de Vlaamse Noord-Zuidbeweging - 11.11.11 /Coalición flamenca para la
Cooperación NorteSur – 11.11.11
Youth Acting for Change Nepal (YAC Nepal)

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Letter to-ambassador-luis-gallegos-chiriboga english-signatures-1

Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...
Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...
Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...Jessica Cannella
 
Sonia omar international system slides bristol
Sonia omar   international system slides  bristolSonia omar   international system slides  bristol
Sonia omar international system slides bristolSWF
 
International human rights law
International human rights lawInternational human rights law
International human rights lawUzma Hasan
 
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions World
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions WorldDay2 Intro Truth Commissions World
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions Worldverapax
 
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexico
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexicoOut of control torture and other ill treatment in mexico
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexicocherazigzag
 
International Law Threatens Western Countries
International Law Threatens Western CountriesInternational Law Threatens Western Countries
International Law Threatens Western CountriesFelicia Barker
 
Human rights law review international recognition of victims’ rights
Human rights law review   international recognition of victims’ rightsHuman rights law review   international recognition of victims’ rights
Human rights law review international recognition of victims’ rightsmarsyslawforall
 
Aanew International Push For Abortion
Aanew International  Push For  AbortionAanew International  Push For  Abortion
Aanew International Push For Abortionamado sandoval
 
Human Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi FormHuman Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi Formzmiers
 
Human Rights
Human RightsHuman Rights
Human RightsAnna
 
Human Rights In Albinism
Human Rights In AlbinismHuman Rights In Albinism
Human Rights In AlbinismNicolle Dammann
 
Havana Club Trademark Dispute Case
Havana Club Trademark Dispute CaseHavana Club Trademark Dispute Case
Havana Club Trademark Dispute CaseNicole Fields
 
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego Lavado
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego LavadoArgentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego Lavado
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego LavadoJLMB
 
Conference topic
Conference topic Conference topic
Conference topic dgmmm
 

Similar a Letter to-ambassador-luis-gallegos-chiriboga english-signatures-1 (20)

Mod 3 International
Mod 3 InternationalMod 3 International
Mod 3 International
 
Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...
Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...
Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...
 
IBAHRI - Annual report - 2012
IBAHRI - Annual report - 2012IBAHRI - Annual report - 2012
IBAHRI - Annual report - 2012
 
Sonia omar international system slides bristol
Sonia omar   international system slides  bristolSonia omar   international system slides  bristol
Sonia omar international system slides bristol
 
International human rights law
International human rights lawInternational human rights law
International human rights law
 
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...
Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil ...
 
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions World
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions WorldDay2 Intro Truth Commissions World
Day2 Intro Truth Commissions World
 
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexico
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexicoOut of control torture and other ill treatment in mexico
Out of control torture and other ill treatment in mexico
 
International Law Threatens Western Countries
International Law Threatens Western CountriesInternational Law Threatens Western Countries
International Law Threatens Western Countries
 
Human rights law review international recognition of victims’ rights
Human rights law review   international recognition of victims’ rightsHuman rights law review   international recognition of victims’ rights
Human rights law review international recognition of victims’ rights
 
Unit iii
Unit iiiUnit iii
Unit iii
 
Aanew International Push For Abortion
Aanew International  Push For  AbortionAanew International  Push For  Abortion
Aanew International Push For Abortion
 
Human Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi FormHuman Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi Form
 
Human Rights
Human RightsHuman Rights
Human Rights
 
Human Rights In Albinism
Human Rights In AlbinismHuman Rights In Albinism
Human Rights In Albinism
 
Havana Club Trademark Dispute Case
Havana Club Trademark Dispute CaseHavana Club Trademark Dispute Case
Havana Club Trademark Dispute Case
 
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
 
UN talk
UN talkUN talk
UN talk
 
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego Lavado
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego LavadoArgentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego Lavado
Argentine : le CCBE intervient pour Me Diego Lavado
 
Conference topic
Conference topic Conference topic
Conference topic
 

Más de FIAN Norge

Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)
Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)
Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)FIAN Norge
 
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN Norge
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN NorgeRetningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN Norge
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN NorgeFIAN Norge
 
Hotl agrofuels-1
Hotl agrofuels-1Hotl agrofuels-1
Hotl agrofuels-1FIAN Norge
 
Eto twelve reasons_web
Eto twelve reasons_webEto twelve reasons_web
Eto twelve reasons_webFIAN Norge
 
Årsmelding 2013
Årsmelding 2013Årsmelding 2013
Årsmelding 2013FIAN Norge
 
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...FIAN Norge
 
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012FIAN Norge
 
Mat og rett 3/2013
Mat og rett 3/2013Mat og rett 3/2013
Mat og rett 3/2013FIAN Norge
 
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 eng
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 engThe Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 eng
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 engFIAN Norge
 
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...FIAN Norge
 
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011FIAN Norge
 
ØSK-konvensjonen
ØSK-konvensjonenØSK-konvensjonen
ØSK-konvensjonenFIAN Norge
 
Versión final informe de monitoreo de agua
Versión final informe de monitoreo de aguaVersión final informe de monitoreo de agua
Versión final informe de monitoreo de aguaFIAN Norge
 
Version final informe aire
Version final informe aireVersion final informe aire
Version final informe aireFIAN Norge
 
Version completa informe de sedimentos
Version completa informe de sedimentosVersion completa informe de sedimentos
Version completa informe de sedimentosFIAN Norge
 
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheter
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheterFNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheter
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheterFIAN Norge
 
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011FIAN Norge
 
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122FIAN Norge
 
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikken
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikkenMeld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikken
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikkenFIAN Norge
 
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheter
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheterStatlig eierskap og menneskerettigheter
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheterFIAN Norge
 

Más de FIAN Norge (20)

Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)
Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)
Retningslinjer for FIAN Norge (eng)
 
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN Norge
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN NorgeRetningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN Norge
Retningslinjer for antikorrupsjon i FIAN Norge
 
Hotl agrofuels-1
Hotl agrofuels-1Hotl agrofuels-1
Hotl agrofuels-1
 
Eto twelve reasons_web
Eto twelve reasons_webEto twelve reasons_web
Eto twelve reasons_web
 
Årsmelding 2013
Årsmelding 2013Årsmelding 2013
Årsmelding 2013
 
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...
Alternative report to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right...
 
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2012
 
Mat og rett 3/2013
Mat og rett 3/2013Mat og rett 3/2013
Mat og rett 3/2013
 
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 eng
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 engThe Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 eng
The Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2013 eng
 
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...
THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE FOOD AND THE COMPLIANCE OF NORWAY WITH ITS EXTRATERRITO...
 
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011
FIAN Norge: Årsmelding 2011
 
ØSK-konvensjonen
ØSK-konvensjonenØSK-konvensjonen
ØSK-konvensjonen
 
Versión final informe de monitoreo de agua
Versión final informe de monitoreo de aguaVersión final informe de monitoreo de agua
Versión final informe de monitoreo de agua
 
Version final informe aire
Version final informe aireVersion final informe aire
Version final informe aire
 
Version completa informe de sedimentos
Version completa informe de sedimentosVersion completa informe de sedimentos
Version completa informe de sedimentos
 
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheter
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheterFNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheter
FNs verdenserklæring om menneskerettigheter
 
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011
Swedwatch rapport (AP-fondsrapport) 2011
 
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122
The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative 28.11.122
 
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikken
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikkenMeld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikken
Meld.St. 11: Global helse i utenriks- og utviklingspolitikken
 
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheter
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheterStatlig eierskap og menneskerettigheter
Statlig eierskap og menneskerettigheter
 

Último

Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEl Estrecho Digital
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..mathiasanna557
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 

Último (8)

Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surchargesEED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
EED - Profits uncontained. An analysis of container shipping ETS surcharges
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
Right to Privacy Case Studies PDF …………..
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 

Letter to-ambassador-luis-gallegos-chiriboga english-signatures-1

  • 1. Quito, Geneva, 10 February 2014 Subject: Open Letter from human rights organizations on the contradictions in Ecuadorian human rights policy Ambassador Luis Gallegos Chiriboga Representative of Ecuador before the Office and Specialized Agencies of the United Nations Organization Geneva, Switzerland. Dear Ambassador, As you and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility in Ecuador know, the undersigning regional and international organizations have publicly expressed support for several initiatives taken by the Ecuadorian government regarding human rights. Specifically, those initiatives to develop a process within the Human Rights Council that would eventually culminate in the adoption of a treaty on human rights and business; this would represent a significant step forward that the international community should take after adopting the “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights” (Human Rights Council, resolution 17/4, 16 June 2011). It is in this context that we welcome the announcement you have made in the Regional Forum on Business and Human Rights for Latin America and the Caribbean, held August 28th – 30th , 2013 in Medellín, Colombia. And later, at the 24th session of the Human Rights Council, where as Ecuador´s representative before the United Nations in Geneva, you made a historical declaration regarding “Transnational Corporations and Human Rights”, which was supported by the African Group, the Arabic Group, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Kyrgyzstan, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Venezuela and Peru. Over a hundred regional and international human rights organizations and social movements welcomed this historic petition on September 13th of last year, as it signaled the loss of trust in voluntary mechanisms which have characterized the debate on corporate social responsibility and facilitated the systematic impunity of transnational corporations. This action taken by the Ecuadorian State was ratified in the Second Forum on Business and Human Rights, held in Geneva and convened by the working group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises on December 3rd and 4th . Despite this position before the international community, we are troubled and concerned by some decisions of the Ecuadorian government which send contradictory messages regarding its human rights priorities. Some of these decisions are: 1.- The executive branch´s decision to dissolve the Pachamama Foundation, a non-governmental organization whose mission has been to promote and defend environmental and indigenous rights for over 16 years, by the express petition of the Ministry of Internal Affairs addressed to the Ministry of the Environment, based on the Public and State security Act, and Executive Decree no. 16, a lower-ranking legal
  • 2. norm that was been subject to three public unconstitutionality actions before the Constitutional Court and a writ of amparo before the Judiciary; 2. - The reiterated public statements made by the highest State authorities (President, Vice-President, Chancellor, National Legal Secretary of the President) on Ecuador´s possible “withdrawal” from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). We suppose that these statements are related to a possible “denouncement” of the American Convention on Human Rights (American Convention), and not to an unlikely withdrawal from the Organization of American States (OAS). Obviously, denouncing the American Convention would have complex and serious consequences for the victims of human rights violations and the users of the Inter-American System of Human Rights (IASHR), fostering impunity for human rights violations and affecting the “principle of universality” which the Ecuadorian State legitimately proclaims in regional and international forums. 3. - The decision of the Ecuadorian government to embark on and lead together with other countries in the region a reform process of the IASHR and in particular the IACHR, which were part of an exhaustive analytical and reform process promoted by the General Assembly and the OAS Permanent Council for two years, a process which concluded on March 22 of last year, in the XLIV Extraordinary General Assembly held in Washington D.C. This initiative included a call for three conferences of the States Parties to the American Convention (Guayaquil, 11 March 2013; Cochabamba, 14 Mayo 2013; and Montevideo, 22 January 2014). The agendas of these conferences were not officially released to the OAS General Assembly or Permanent Council, the IACHR, civil society organizations, social movements or key actors in the IASHR. Mr. Ambassador, as you may understand, this national and international human rights policy does not reflect the discourse rightly used by the Ecuadorian State at the Human Rights Council, especially regarding the need of a new binding international human rights instrument that would contribute to ending the impunity currently enjoyed by transnational corporations in our countries. Ecuador, in particular, is currently litigating an asymmetrical case against one of the most powerful transnational oil companies in the world, Chevron-Texaco. Dear Ambassador, we acknowledge Ecuador´s initiative at the Human Rights Council, which demonstrates that Ecuador aims to strengthen human rights systems and wishes to end impunity for human rights violations committed by the corporate sector. Nevertheless, this action does not justify Ecuadorian policies that weaken human rights in its territory and the Americas, which is how Ecuador has been treating the Inter-American System of Human Rights, the Pachamama Foundation and the Ecuadorian Amazon. We are calling on the Ecuadorian government to reconsider its policies regarding the Inter-American System, revoke its decision on the Pachamama Foundation, and protect the rights of indigenous people and of nature in line with the Ecuadorian constitution. Sincerely, C.c. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Permanent Representative of Ecuador to the OAS Sub-Commission on Human Rights of the European Parliament European External Action Service
  • 3. European Union Delegation in Ecuador Ambassador of Ecuador in Brussels and Stockholm Supporters of this letter: Acción por la Biodiversidad Ágora Espacio Civil, Paraguay Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH), Peru Asociación por la Integración Latinoamericana (APILA), Chile Bangladesh Fish Workers’ Alliance Coordinadora Andina de Organizaciones Indígenas (CAOI) Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Washington D.C. Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales, Ecuador Centro de Documentación en Derechos Humanos “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J. (CSMM), Ecuador Colectivo Pro Derechos Humanos (PRODH), Ecuador Comité de América Latina y el Caribe para la Defensa de los Derechos de las Mujeres (CLADEM) Comité Permanente por la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos, Ecuador Confederación de los pueblos Kichwa del Ecuador (ECUARUNARI) Confederación Unitaria de Comerciantes Minoristas y Trabajadores Autónomos del Ecuador Coordinadora Nacional de Ecuatorianos en España Ecologistas en Acción, España Entrepueblos-Entrepobles-Herriarte-Entrepobos, España FIAN Internacional Franciscans International Fundación de Culturas Indígenas Kawsay, Ecuador Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights GRAIN Habitat International Coalition Human Rights Without Frontiers Int'l, Bélgica Instituto de Estudios Políticos para América Latina y África, España Instituto de Estudios sobre Desarrollo y Cooperación Internacional de la Universidad del País Vasco (HEGOA), España. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Dinamarca Labour, Health and Human Rights Development Centre Manitese, Italia Pachamama, Ecuador People's Health Movement (PHM) Plataforma Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo (PIDHDD) Share the World's Resources, Reino Unido Transnational Institute, Holanda Koepel van de Vlaamse Noord-Zuidbeweging - 11.11.11 /Coalición flamenca para la Cooperación NorteSur – 11.11.11 Youth Acting for Change Nepal (YAC Nepal)