SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 130
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Development of Agricultural Science


              Discovering Favourable Gene Resources
                       for Crop Improvement
                                         Ruilian Jing
                                      jingrl@caas.net.cn
   The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement/Institute of Crop Science
                              Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)




                                                 Specific Topic for Student Abroad • Oct. 20, 2011
Outline
Why ?
Where ?
How ?
  Phenotyping
  Genotyping
  Utilization
Feeding the 9 billion people expected to inhabit our
planet by 2050 will be an unprecedented challenge

                                       Special issue 2010




          Special issue 2007


         Special issue 2003




                                        Special issue 2008
“Take one world already being
exhausted by 6 billion people. Find
the ingredients to feed another 2
billion people. Add demand for more
food, more animal feed and more
fuel. Use only the same amount of
water the planet has had since
creation. And don’t forget to
restore the environment that
sustains us. Stir very carefully.”


Margaret Catley-Carlson
2008-2009 Chair of World Economic
Forum Global Agenda Council on
Water Security

           World Economic Forum, Davos
           January 2009
Area-Total yield-Yield per unit of cereal crops
         in China during 1952-2008



                                              Area
                                            (10 M ha.)


                                            Total yield
                                            (100 M ton)

                                            Unit yield
                                            (ton·ha-1)



    1950’        1960’-1990’      1998-
                                          Zhensheng Li
Abiotic & biotic stresses on crop plants
 Drought, Waterlogging/Submergence
 Heat, Cold
 Mineral deficiency/Mineral toxicity
 Salinity ……
 Diseases and Insect pests


                              http://www.plantstress.com
To keep pace with food consumer
demand, muti-favourable genes
should be pyramided in crop cultivars.

To discover favourable gene
resources for improving crop plants.
 The “green revolution
  gene” is an allele of gene
  which control plant height.
 0nly a base pair difference
  between wild type and
  mutant type.
 Finding and utilization of
  this one base mutation
  resulted in a “Green
  Revolution”



  Nature, 1999, 400: 256-261
Nature allele variation is widely
                            present in plant germplasm.
                            Difference of fruit weight of tomato
                            between wild type and cultivar type
                            is a few base pair change in the
                            promoter region of gene fw2.2.




Science, 2000, 289: 85-88
Hybrid rice successful utilization in
China due to a cytoplasmic male sterility
      gene discovered in wild rice




      Wild rice                   Hybrid rice
Soybean is originated from China. Wild
     soybean is high diversity.
Wild rice
                       野生稻聚群




      Salsa
(Suaeda heteroptera)
 碱蓬(又名盐蒿)
Hexaploid Agropyron
                      六倍体冰草
                       (Xinjiang)




Psathyrostachys
 陕西华山新麦草
    (Shaanxi)
Investigation and
collection of plant
    germplasm
National Long-
term Genebank




Founded in 1986   -18℃, RH≤50%±7%
                  712 Species; 397,000 accessions
National Medium-term Genebank




                          0-40C
Distribution of 32 National Germplasm Nursries


                                                                                             29 黑龙江




                                                                                              吉林
                                                                                                    25
                                                                                                   19

           14                                                  蒙                        辽宁
                                                                                             24
       新         疆                                                    9
                                                              北京                             23
                                           内           26    Ⅰ 22
                               甘                              Ⅲ 32
                                                          山      天津
                                                               河
                                           宁               17 北
                                      肃              陕    西         山东
                               Ⅱ          夏
                                                                              12
                       青   海
                                                                               28
                                                16
                                                     西              10             江苏
                                                              河 南                   13 
                                                                              安         7
           西     藏                                                            徽                上海
                                                              湖北     5 4
                                四     川    重庆                         18                6
                                               11                                       浙
                                                                          江              江
                                                              8
                                                         湖 南
                                                                          西         福   21
                                           贵 州
                                                                                    建
                                                                                              台
                                    15
                               云 南                                  广     东                   湾
                                     27         广 西                    20
                                                                    1  3
            图例:
                                                 2
             资源库
                                                          30
南海诸岛            资源圃                                     海南
                                                         
                                                         31
Geographic distribution of crop germplasm in China



                              Wheat




Rice                          Soybean
National Germplasm Nursry: Grape, Jujube
           10 species, 636 accessions
National Germplasm Nursry: perennial grasses
            147 species, 432 accessions




  国家内蒙多年生牧草圃:147个种、432份
CIMMYT
Germplasm Resources
?
?                            Gene Resources
    ?
        ?
    ?
        ?




How can we discover
beneficial genes?


    More than 7 million accessions have been collected and
    conserved in the germplasm banks in the world. How to
    find the favourable genes from the huge number of plant
    germplasm resources for plant breeding?
Rice genome sequencing and
    functional genomics



植物功能基因组学研究进展迅速
  完成了水稻基因组测序
为分离和发掘新基因奠定了基础




                             2002
Forward- vs. reverse-genetics approaches

                    QTL mapping,
            Association mapping, Positional
              cloning, Mutagenesis, etc.


               Forward genetics

                                              Candidate
                   Reverse genetics           sequence

Phenotype                                     Genotype
                Genetic engineering,
              RNAi, TILLING, Insertional
                 mutagenesis, etc.
Phenotyping
--- base for discovering genes

   (Case: drought tolerance)
An unexpectedly abrupt
decline in the supply of
water for China’s farmers
poses a rising threat to
world food security.




                  WORLD•WATCH July/August 1998
China: Precipitation




About 50% of land area is arid and semi-arid in China, where
6 667 000 ha of rainfed wheat are grown with low and variable yield.
Developing drought-tolerant cultivars is an efficient way to stabilize
wheat production and ensure food security in China and the world.
Total drought area

                                                           10.5 Mha

                                                      8.8 Mha

                 Average year: 1.7 Mha drought area




Provinces suffered from drought stress
        in the early spring 2009
Qingtu Lake in Min Qin, from lake to desert in 40 years

                            Reeds and remaining shells
Abandoned village
The Aral Sea
in Central
Asia, once the
4th largest
saline water,
has shrunk
by 75% in
surface area
since 1960s
The Chad Lake in central africa, once the 6th largest lake
 in the world, 90% reduction in size from 1972 to 2006
The Lake Faguibine in Mali, change from 1974 to 2006
Drought seriously limits crop production in
                many areas of the world, especially in China.
                More than 70% water is used in the crop
                production in China.


                                         Water shortage
                                         Big population




Crop drought-tolerance improvement
is a challenging task for breeders.
Discover and use drought-tolerant
gene resources in the crop breeding
can contribute to improvement for
water-limited environments.
Water shortage in agriculture




                ‘Blue Revolution –
                more crop for every
                drop’


                Norman E. Borlaug
                Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 1970
1. Understanding the molecular
mechanisms of water stress responses

 Difference in dehydration tolerance and drought
tolerance
• The former is the capability to maintain functions
  and minimize damages under dehydration .
 In reality, crop plants cannot survive for long under prolonged
 dehydration. What we see are a short-term stress responses.

• The later is the ability to grow and yield under less
  soil moisture.
 This should be the trait of crops in drought-prone areas.
 How can plant maintain turgidity with
  declining soil water availability? The
  molecular details about how the metabolic
  genes are regulated in responses?
 How can plant maintain their membrane
  integrity under oxidative stress which is a
  secondary stress derived from water
  stress?
 How are the other physiological functions
  maintained or regulated as an integrative
  response to water stress?
2. Breeding cultivars to cope with
         specific objectives

Drought breeding should be localized with
specific objectives to specific areas, such
as less irrigation, rainfed in semi-arid.
Conventional breeding is time consuming and labor
costly since it is a natural selection under drought
condition. However, large scale gene recombination
can be easily achieved.
2. Breeding cultivars to cope with
       specific objectives

Molecular breeding is more efficient but
the available magic drought-resistant
genes are very limited.
 Genes for root traits should be tapped.
 Drought tolerance is fundamentally related to the
  capability to maintain water balance, much less
  to the ability to tolerate dehydration.
Whole-plant responses to drought stress
Left: long-term or acclimation responses; right: short-term responses
                         (Chaves, et al., 2003)
Sensing, signalling and
cell-level responses to
     drought stress

 ABA-mediated responses
 Non-ABA-mediated responses
 Other mechanisms

      (Chaves, et al., 2003)
Dissecting yield into bite size “physiological markers”

                       Traits
                                                                              G-C
                                              G-C                             T-A
                                              T-A
                                                                                    G-C

  Y                                                   G-C
                                                      T-A
                                                            G-C
                                                                                    T-A
                                                                                          G-C
                                                                                          T-A
                                                            T-A                                 G-C

  I          •   Ground cover                                     G-C
                                                                  T-A
                                                                        G-C
                                                                                                T-A
                                                                                                      G-C
                                                                                                      T-A


  E          •   Plant height                 G-C
                                              T-A
                                                    G-C
                                                                        T-A
                                                                              G-C
                                                                              T-A
                                                    T-A                             G-C
             •   Root depth                               G-C                       T-A

  L          •   Transpiration efficiency
                                                          T-A
                                                                G-C
                                                                T-A
                                                                                          G-C
                                                                                          T-A
                                                                                                G-C
                                                                      G-C                       T-A

  D          •   Stem carbohydrates           G-C
                                                                      T-A
                                                                            G-C
                                                                            T-A
                                                                                                      G-C
                                                                                                      T-A

                                              T-A                                 G-C

             •   Spike photosynthesis               G-C
                                                    T-A
                                                          G-C
                                                                                  T-A
                                                                                        G-C
                                                                                        T-A

             •   ……
                                                          T-A                                 G-C

  P                                                             G-C
                                                                T-A
                                                                      G-C
                                                                                              T-A
                                                                                                    G-C
                                                                                                    T-A
                                              G-C                     T-A

  O                                           T-A
                                                    G-C
                                                    T-A
                                                                            G-C
                                                                            T-A
                                                                                  G-C
                                                          G-C                     T-A

  T                                                       T-A
                                                                G-C
                                                                T-A
                                                                                        G-C
                                                                                        T-A
                                                                                              G-C
                                              G-C                     G-C                     T-A

  E          •   Interception of radiation
                                              T-A
                                                    G-C
                                                    T-A
                                                                      T-A
                                                                            G-C
                                                                            T-A
                                                                                                    G-C
                                                                                                    T-A

                                                          G-C                     G-C

  N          •   Canopy cooling                           T-A
                                                                G-C
                                                                                  T-A
                                                                                        G-C
                                              G-C               T-A                     T-A


  T          •   Membrane thermostability     T-A
                                                    G-C
                                                    T-A
                                                                      G-C
                                                                      T-A
                                                                            G-C
                                                                                              G-C
                                                                                              T-A
                                                                                                    G-C

             •   Photoprotection                          G-C
                                                          T-A
                                                                            T-A
                                                                                  G-C
                                                                                                    T-A


  I          •   ……
                                                                G-C
                                                                T-A
                                                                      G-C
                                                                                  T-A
                                                                                        G-C
                                                                                        T-A
                                                                      T-A                     G-C

  A                                                                         G-C
                                                                            T-A
                                                                                  G-C
                                                                                              T-A
                                                                                                    G-C
                                                                                                    T-A
                                                                                  T-A

  L                                                                                     G-C
                                                                                        T-A



                    Environment
                                                                                              G-C



                                             Genes
                                                                                              T-A
                                                                                                    G-C
                                                                                                    T-A




                                             M Reynolds, 2010
Early generation selection methodologies




 Visual selection ++     Leaf porometry




 Canopy temperature    Spectral reflectance
Factors affecting Canopy Temperature
          Depression (CTD) in plants
                                                                      Radiation
    Biological                                Environmental
                             Clouds
              Partitioning                o
                                       (T C)


                                                          H2O
                              CTD
                                                       Evaporation

 Metabolism

                                                           Wind
Vascular
Transport


                                      H2O (soil water availability)

                                                (M Reynolds, 2001)
5500


Grain yield (kg/ha)
                      5000
                      4500
                      4000
                      3500
                      3000
                      2500
                      2000
                      1500
                          5.0         6.0       7.0       8.0         9.0
                                Canopy temperature depression (oC)

 The relationship of grain yield to CTD, mean of 2
sowings dates, Tlaltizapán, 1992-93, 23 genotypes.
                                (Amani, Fischer and Reynolds, 1996)
Selection for canopy temperature: to enrich
    favourable alleles before yield testing
Use of CTD in early generation selection
- F4 bulks under drought stress (R. Trethowan)
- Following visual selection, CTD scores used to influence gene frequency
                                    29
                                   28.5
      C a n o p y te m p p o s t




                                    28
                                   27.5
             flo w e rin g




                                    27
                                   26.5
                                    26
                                   25.5
                                    25
                                   24.5
                                          20   21        22      23       24        25   26
                                                    Canopy temperature vegetative
Complementing breeder selection with
canopy temperature
(Van Ginkel et al., 2008)

                    14
                                                          BREEDER
                    12                                    BREEDER+CTD
Individual number




                    10
                    8
                    6
                    4
                    2
                    0
                         6.3   6.8   7.3            7.8       8.3
                                     Yield (t/ha)
Sampling soil core
  To sample roots
  To measure soil moisture profiles




                       CIMMYT
Models to quantify yield under abiotic stress

  Drought yield =
    Water Uptake x WUE x HI (partitioning)
    (Passioura, 1977)

 Irrigated yield =
    Light Interception x RUE x HI (partitioning)

         WUE: water use efficiency
         RUE: radiation use efficiency
         HI: harvest index
Generic model of stress adaptation under drought & heat

Photo-protection                 Water use efficiency (WUE) &
                                 Radiation use efficiency (RUE)
 Pigments for dissipation
 of excess light energy, e.g.     •Transpiration efficiency (drought only)
 carotenoids measured               • CID
 using spectral reflectance       •Heat tolerant metabolism (growth rate)
 (RARSc)                            • Stay green (CHL)
                                    • CO2 fixation rate (COND)


Early growth (pre-grainfill)           Access to water by roots
                                      (indicated by cooler canopies)
• Ground cover: measured with
  spectral indices (NDVI & WI)        • Under drought estimates water use
• Growth rate (BMA)                   • Under hot, irrigated conditions:
• Stem carbohydrates (CHO)              estimates CO2 fixation and thus
                                        radiation use efficiency
Physiological breeding: strategic crossing for drought
             YLD = WU x WUE x HI (Passioura, 1979)

   Photo-Protection                 Transpiration Efficiency
   Leaf morphology
                                    WUE of leaf photosynthesis
      • wax/pubescence
      • posture/rolling               low 12C/13C discrimination
   Pigments                         Spike/awn photosynthesis
      • chl a:b
      • carotenoids
   Antioxidants


       Partitioning (HI)                 Water Uptake
       Partitioning to stem          Rapid ground cover
         carbohydrates                 • protects soil moisture
                                     Access to water by roots
       Harvest index                   • Ψ leaf
       • Rht alleles                   • cool canopy
                                       • (osmotic adjustment)

(Reynolds & Tuberosa, 2008. COPB)
2001
Plant
phenotyping
methodology

Drought phenotyping
in crops: from theory
to practice
www.generationcp.org/
drought_phenotyping
2011
Genotyping
--- to discover gene resources

   (Case: drought tolerance)
Outline

Linkage mapping
Association mapping
Functional marker mapping
Perspective of MAS
Evaluation of drought
                               Drought tolerant genotypes
tolerance at seedling stage   survived in the soil moisture of
                               ~17% relative water content
Drought tolerance
evaluation in the field
         2009
                              Henan




                     Shanxi   Henan
Linkage mapping               Association mapping
Hanxuan 10 × Lumai 14
                                   Historical winter
  DHLs                             wheat collection
               RILs
 DT QTLs
                                      DT QTLs

      Introgression lines (BC3F3-4)
                         Donor 1
           Jinmai 47 ×   Donor 2
                           .
                           .
                           .



              Elite alleles
Parents
 Hanxuan 10
 Drought tolerant
 cultivar grown under
 rainfed condition in
 semi-arid region

 Lumai 14
 High yield potential
 cultivar grown under
 irrigated condition
                    Hanxuan 10          DH Lines
                          Lumai 14 (Hanxuan 10 × Lumai 14)
Water Regime Treatments for Phenotyping
Treatment: Rainfed/Drought stress
Control: Well watered

Traits for QTL Mapping
Agronomic traits (coleoptile length, early vigor, heading date,
flowering date, plant height, spike number per plant, kernel per
spike, spike length, seed setting, thousand-grain weight, plant
morphology and grain yield)
Physiological traits (stay-green, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf
water status, canopy temperature, accumulation and remobilization
of stem water-soluble carbohydrates)
Anatomical structure (number and area of vascular bundles)
QTLs for accumulation and remobilization of
    stem water-soluble carbohydrates
Yang et al., Genetics. 2007, 176: 571-584
Integrated mapping of QTLs controlling
      drought tolerance in wheat
        S le : 7 re p e a ta tio n
                                             F v /F o - W W (1 2 .0 9 % )
        (1 7 .4 3 % ~ 2 2 .4 4 % )
                                             R A L V B -D S (1 3 .1 6 % )
                                             H e i (8 .4 9 % ~ 3 1 .0 4 % )
        K w e (3 3 .3 9 % )
                                             S le (9 .1 5 % ~ 1 8 .7 3 % )
        K g n (1 5 .5 5 % ~ 2 9 .0 6 % )
                                             K w e i (1 4 .0 6 % )
        T s p ( 1 0 .0 7 % ~ 1 2 .2 5 )
                                             P y i ( 8 .5 7 % )
        H e i ( 9 .3 9 % ~ 2 1 .1 3 % )
        P y i (1 0 .6 2 % ~ 1 9 .2 3 % )
        S le ( 1 3 .6 2 % )
        S s p ( 8 .8 6 % )


        N U P - H N 2 (1 4 .0 % )
        N U P - L N 1 (6 .0 % )                  R P A T V B ( 1 3 .2 3 % )
        R D W - H ( 1 1 .0 % )                   S le ( 7 .8 % ~ 2 1 .9 7 % )
                                                 S p i ( 6 .5 9 ~ 1 0 .3 7 % )




         C h lC (1 1 .6 8 % )                     K g n ( 2 2 .6 2 % )
         N S V B ( 2 1 .3 8 % )                   S s p (6 .4 3 % ~ 1 4 .3 8 % )
         N T V B ( 2 0 .3 6 % )                   S p i (9 .3 7 % )
         T s p (8 .0 9 % ~ 3 4 .9 3 % )
         S s p (1 0 .8 9 % ~ 3 0 .9 7 % )
                                                  N L V B -D S
         H e i (9 .3 2 % ~ 2 1 .7 9 )
                                                  (1 6 .0 5 % )
                                                  F m -D S ( 2 6 .5 8 % )
         T s p ( 1 5 .7 1 % ~ 2 4 .5 3 % )        F v -D S (2 2 .9 9 % )
         H e i ( 2 4 .5 3 % ~ 4 3 .4 5 % )        R F W (1 0 .3 7 % )
                                                  N U P -H (4 .3 % )
QTL validation in different populations




   DH (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14)   RIL (Opata85×W7984)
E1: 2001 Fenyang, Shanxi
                                                          E2: 2005 Haidian, Beijing
                                                          E3: 2005 Changping, Beijing
                                               DS
                                                          E4: 2006 Haidian, Beijing
                                                          E5: 2006 Changping, Beijing
                          Plant height
                                                          E6: 2001 Fenyang, Shanxi
                          phenotyping
                                                          E7: 2005 Haidian, Beijing
                                               WW         E8: 2005 Changping, Beijing
                                                          E9: 2006 Haidian, Beijing
                                                          E10: 2006 Changping, Beijing

                          Condition PH
                          ---net increase effect
                             in the given period

     S1|S0        S2|S1         S3|S2        S4|S3         S5|S4


S0           S1            S2           S3           S4            S5

                                             Unconditional PH---
                                             accumulated effect
QTL mapping

Mixed linear model was used to divide genetic
effects into additive main effects (a), epistatic main
effects (aa) and their environment interaction
effects (QE, including ae and aae).




                                            Cao et al, 2001
QTLs for plant height during ontogeny in DHLs
                                 Additive QTLs                Epistatic QTL pairs
     Traits      Stages                  a         b                        c       d
                          Number       A         AE       Number       AA       AAE
Unconditional     S1        12         12          6         7           7        2
plant height      S2        11         11          7        18          18        4
                  S3        12         12          7        19          19        3
                  S4        10         10          4        22          22        1
                  S5        10         10          5        20          20        2
                 Total      55         55         29        86          86       12
Conditional      S1|S0      12         12          6         7           7        2
plant height     S2|S1       3          3          3         4           4        3
                 S3|S2       4          4          3         4           2        3
                 S4|S3       1          1          1         3           1        2
                 S5|S4       6          5          5         5           3        3
                 Total      26         26         18        23          17       13
        a QTL number with additive main effects;
        b QTL number with additive environment interaction effects;
        c QTL pair number with additive epistatic effects;
        d QTL pair number with epistatic environment interaction effects.
Uneven distributions of PH QTLs on chromosomes
            Unconditional plant height            Conditional plant height
        Chrom.    Homeologous       Genome   Chrom.    Homeologous       Genome
                      group                                group
 1A       2                            36       1                          19
 1B       18                           51       7                          23
 1D       2             22             22       1             9            11
 2A       8                                     3
 2B       4                                     1
 2D       10            22                      6            10
 3A       3                                     1
 3B       12                                    4
 3D       3             18                                    5
 4A       5                                     1
 4B       2                                     2
 4D       2             9                       2             5
 5A       7                                     3
 5B       5                                     4
 5D       1             13                                    7
 6A       6                                     4
 6B       6                                     4
 6D                     12                                    8
 7A       5                                     6
 7B       4                                     1
 7D       4             13                      2             9
Total    109                                   53
Common QTLs for plant height development between
          unconditional and conditional analysis in DHLs
Stage      QTLs         Marker interval      A           AE1        AE2      AE3         AE4    AE5   AE6     AE7         AE8     AE9     AE10
                                                 ***                               **                                                            *
S1|S0   QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     1.85                             -0.83                              0.35                       0.77
                                                  ***           *                   *                                *
S3|S2   QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     -0.50         -0.86       0.48   -0.74         0.52   0.39 -0.36   0.74                 0.51   -0.54

                                                 ***                               **                                                            *
 S1     QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     1.85                             -0.83                              0.35                       0.77
                                                 ***                               ***                              ***                         ***
 S2     QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     3.89                             -2.44                             1.87         -1.06          2.13
                                                 ***                               ***
 S3     QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     3.02                             -1.92                              1.03        -0.64
                                                 ***                               ***
 S4     QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     4.70          -0.86              -2.96         0.75                 0.83        -0.89   1.28    0.85
                                                 ***
 S5     QPh.cgb-2D.1   WMC453.1-WMC18     2.84                              -0.86        0.49
0.5




                                                                        Component contribution
                         0.5
Component contribution




                                                                                                 0.4
                         0.4
                                                                                                 0.3
                         0.3
                                                                                                 0.2
                         0.2
                                                                                                 0.1
                         0.1
                                                                                                   0
                          0                                                                               S0      S1          S2      S3      S4
                                                                                                       S1|     S2|     S3
                                                                                                                          |
                                                                                                                                   S4|     S5|
                               S1




                                          S3
                                     S2




                                               S4



                                                         S5



                                                h^2(A)        h^2(AE)                             h^2(AA)      h^2(AAE)



                                    Contributions of different genetic effects to
                                      plant height during ontogeny in DHLs
Rht1
       (Cadalen, 1998;                                                  QTLs        Epi.
       Huang, 2006;
       Sourdille, 2003;
       Liu, 2006;                                                   a   e   ae aa    e aae
       McCartney, 2005)
                                                               S1
                                                               S2
                                Rht12   (Ellis, 2005)
                                                        Un.    S3
                                                               S4
                                 Rht9 (Schnurbusch, 2003;      S5
                                        Ellis, 2005)
                                                               S1
                                                               S2
                                                        Con.   S3
                     Rht2
           (Cadalen,1998;                                      S4
           Huang, 2003, 2006;                                  S5
           McCartney, 2005;
           Sourdille, 2003)




PH QTL clusters matched up to Rht genes in DHLs
Rht8 (Korzun, 1998)




                          Rht5
                          (Ellis,
                         2005)




                                     Rht13
                                     (Ellis 2005)




PH QTL clusters near Rht genes in DHLs
(Cadalen et al. 1998)




                             (Ellis, 2005)




PH QTL clusters on other chromosomes
(McCartney ,2005;
                                                 Cadalen, 1998;
                                                 Sourdille, 2003;
                                                 Quarrie, ,2006)




         (Schnurbusch, 2003)




PH QTL clusters on other chromosomes
                               Wu et al., JXB, 2010, 61: 2923-2937
Association analysis of candidate PH QTLs
270 historical winter wheat accessions
60 candidate SSR markers in six chromosome regions


               Rht8
                            Rht1




                                              Rht12


                                               Rht9



                                      Rht2                 Rht13




                                   Ave. Dis. = 4.7 cM
                                   Wheat, Consensus SSR, 2004
Associations of plant height developmental
     behavior and the candidate markers
Total of 46 marker-trait associations were detected, among
them 13 associations were highly significant (P<0.001).
Five loci were also worked in DHLs.
                   6.5
                   6.0
                   5.5
                                                         -Log (P)>3
    -Lg(P value)




                   5.0
                   4.5
                   4.0
                   3.5
                   3.0
                   2.5
                   2.0
                                          m




                                          2


                                          2
                                          1


                                          1
                                          m
                                          2




                                          1


                                          3


                                          4
                                          3


                                          3
                                          2




                                        H
                                        H


                                        H




                                        H
                                       TC




                                       PH
                                       PH


                                       PH




                                       PH


                                       PH
                                        H




                                       PH
                                        H




                                      -P


                                      -P
                                      -P


                                      -P
                                     -P




                                     -P
                                    -D




                                    5-


                                    9-


                                    9-
                                    2-


                                    5-


                                    5-




                                   09
                                   09


                                   09




                                   09
                                  43




                                  49




                                 49


                                 24


                                 24
                                 30


                                 49


                                 49
                                 43




                                c1


                                c1


                                c1


                                c1
                                fd




                               c3


                              m


                              m




                              m


                              m


                              m
                              fd




                              m




                             ar


                             ar
                            Xc




                             ar


                             ar
                            m




                            w


                            w
                            w


                            w




                            w
                           Xc




                            w




                          Xb




                          Xb


                          Xb
                          Xb
                         Xw


                         Xg


                         Xg




                         Xg


                         Xg


                         Xg
                         Xg




                                          Associations
                           -Lg (P) value at different associations
2D              PIC
            2D   0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0




     23.2                                                  Xgwm261 PH       PH4   PH4
                                                                      2




     32.1                                                  Xgwm455                                Rht8 (Korzun, 1998)
     37.1                                                  Xwmc470
     40.7                                                  Xgwm484    PH3
     43.1                                                   Xcfd43
                                                                      PH2   PH3   PH4 DTC2 DTC3
     46.7                                                  Xbarc168
                                                                      PH1
     48.2                                                  Xgwm102

cM

     63.6                                                  Xgwm249    PH3   PH4
     63.7                                                   Xwmc18
     65.2                                                   Xcfd17
     65.8                                                  Xcfd116
     66.7                                                   Xcfd84
     67.1                                                  Xwmc144
     68.8                                                  Xcfd160
     73.1                                                  Xgwm157
      81                                                   Xbarc228 DTC4
     82.8                                                   Xwmc41 DTC
                                                                      4
     90.9                                                  Xgwm539
                                  Ht= 0.5806
4D            PIC
            4D   0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0



      28                                                   Xwmc112   PH4    DTCm
     32.9                                                  Xcfd23    PHm    PHm
                                                                                                                                   Rht2
     33.1                                                  Xgwm133   PHm    DTCm
     34.5                                                  Xgwm192   PHm    PH1    PH3                           Cadalen,1998; Huang, 2003, 2006;
                                                                                                                 McCartney, 2005; Sourdille, 2003

     42.9                                                  Xwmc331




cM
      54                                                   Xwmc399



                                                                      PHm      PH1       PH2   PH3   PH4   Plant height under well-watered

                                                                      PHm      PH1       PH2   PH3   PH4   Plant height under drought-stress

                                                                     DTCm DTC1 DTC2 DTC3 DTC4              Drought tolerance coefficient


     78.8                                                  Xcfd233
      82                                                   Xgwm194   PH1

                                    Ht= 0.6489

                                                                              Zhang et al., Planta, 2011
                                                                              (DOI 10.1007/s00425-011-1434-8)
Phenotypic effects of marker alleles
                                                           Xcfd23-4D                          Xgwm495-4B
                                                    A217   A220    A223    A155   A159      A163   A165    A167      A179   A181
                                             10
P la n t h e ig h t a t m a tu r e ( c m )




                                              5

                                              0

                                              -5

                                             -10

                                             -15

                                             -20
                                                                  PH under drought-stress    PH under well-watered
Allele effect on plant height of associated
                 locus in drought environment
                                                              Average effect                  Percentage of effect (%)
 Locus       Allele   Effect     Typical accession
                                                     Positive effect   Negative effect   Positive effect    Negative effect
Xbarc168      160     + 37.5   中苏68 Zhongsu68
            160:174   + 17.8   科遗29 Keyi 29
            160:172   + 17.6   庆丰1号 Qingfeng 1
            162:174   + 29.2   华北187 Huabei 187       +26.0                    0             +34.5                 0
Xgwm285       220     - 17.8   西安8号 Xian 8
              222     - 13.9   中麦9号 Zhongmai 9
              228     - 17.6   鲁麦14 Lumai 14
              238      - 3.3   鲁麦1号 Lumai 1
              254     - 11.5   衡95观26 Heng 95 Guan 26
              256      - 5.0   衡5229 Heng 5229          0                   -11.5              0                 -11.0
Xgwm126       193     + 20.1   冀麦32 Jimai 32
              195     + 32.8   燕大1817 Yanda 817
              199     + 12.8   科遗29 Keyi 29             +21.9                  0             +29.6                 0
Xgwm95        108      - 5.2   太原566 Taiyuan 566
              118     - 24.7   陕229 Shan 229
              120     - 24.1   豫麦13 Yumai 13
              122     - 31.7   西安8号 Xian 8                0                - 21.4              0                 - 18.3
Xgwm212        99      - 3.2   矮孟牛Ⅳ型(8057) Aimengniu
              103     + 9.9    丹麦1号 Danmai 1            + 9.9               - 3.2            + 10.4              - 3.3
Xwmc396       151     + 14.6   晋麦16 Jinmai 16
              153     + 3.2    晋麦44 Jinmai44
              157     + 0.4    冀麦32 Jimai 32
              510      -2.1    鲁215953 Lu 215953         + 6.0              - 2.1            + 6.7               - 2.4

                                                 Wei et al., Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36:895-904
Validation of Xwmc349 allelic effect
        in ILs with Jinmai 47 background
                                                  Average variance
Allele Effect on PH IL No.        Range of PH
                                                    to receptor
A99         -12.4         24       -19 ~ +14                0

A103        -11.1         6          -9 ~ +6                -2

Xwmc349 allele: A99(-12.4), A101, A103(-11.1), A105(+6.0)
Summary
 Plant height is a typically quantitative trait
  controlled by additive effects and epistatic
  effects.
 A list of marker-PH association was identified
  in the chromosome regions of PH QTLs or
  Rht genes detected in DHLs.
 Allele effects have to be validated in multi-
  genetic backgrounds.
Flow chart of suppression subtractive
        hybridization (SSH)
   Wheat seedling           Data analysis
(-0.5MPa PEG-6000)
                            Test sequences
mRNA preparation
                         SSH 1, 6, 12, 24, 48h
  cDNA synthesis           cDNA libraries

  Rsa I digestion          Transformation

  Adaptor ligation          Vector ligation

First hybridization    Second PCR amplification

Second hybridization   First PCR amplification
Assessment of contigs from the cDNA libraries
      responding to water stress by suppression
           subtractive hybridization (SSH)
                            Known               Unknown
 cDNA         Valid Total              Uni- functional contigs
                           functional
library       ESTs contigs            contigs
                             contigs          Number %
SSH 1h         1697        938            146           114            792       84.43
SSH 6h         1824        566            265           203            301       53.18
SSH 12h        1833        516            166           133            350       67.83
SSH 24h        1131        786            441           202            345       43.89
SSH 48h        1148        635            414           234            221       34.80
Total          6733       3441           1432           886          2009        58.38
Wheat seedlings were treated with -0.5MPa PEG-6000 for 1, 6, 12, 24, 48h, respectively.
Classification of genes that respond to water stress
              1h, 6h, 12h, 24h and 48h
                                                G1: Alcohol dehydrogenase
                                                G2: Aldehyde dehydrogenase
                    SSH 1h                      G3: Ca2+-binding proteins
                                                G4: Calmondulin binding proteins
                     1 / 19                     G5: Carbohydrate metabolism-related proteins
                                                G6: Cellular structure and organization-related proteins
                                                G7: Cytochrome p450
                1             1                 G8: Detoxification enzymes
                                                G9: Fatty acid metabolism-related proteins
                                                G10: Ferritin
  SSH 48h                             SSH 6h    G11: Membrane proteins
    1/26                                        G12: Osmoprotectant synthesis-related proteins
                                       0 / 19   G13: Plant defence-related proteins
                                                G14: Protease inhibitor
                    13 / 27                     G15: Protection factors of macromolecules
                                                G16: Protein kinases
            2                     2
                                                G17: Protein phosphatases
                                                G18: Protein synthesis-related proteins
                                                G19: Proteinases
                                                G20: Proteins involved in biosynthesis and metabolism of hormones
                                                G21: Proteins regulated by various hormones
                                                G22: Reproductive development-related proteins
       SSH 24h         1      SSH 12h           G23: Respiration-related proteins
         0/17                   1/24            G24: RNA-binding proteins
                                                G25: Secondary metabolism-related proteins
                                                G26: Senescence-related proteins
                                                G27: Transcription factors



Black represents the number of shared/total classification in 5 cDNA libraries;
Red represents the number of classification shared by 2 bordering upon libraries;
Blue represents the number of special/total classification in the library.
Putative key classifications of differential
 expressed genes from 648 Uni-genes
  Protein                  Protein kinase   Ca2+-binding
  phosphatase                  4.01%        protein
  2.16%                                     0.62%

  Transcription                              Calmondulin
  factor                                     binding protein
                                             0.46%
  6.17%
                                             Detoxification
                                             enzyme
                                             3.40%

                                             Plant defence-
  Others                                     related protein
  65.74%                                     8.33%

                                             Membrane protein
                                             9.11%

                  Pang et al., Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2007, 33:333-336
Case 1: TaPP2Ac (protein phosphatase 2Ac)


                             TaPP2Ac
                             identified from cDNA
                             libraries at 6h and
                             12h, plays important
                             roles in cellular
                             growth and signalling,
                             ubiquitously
                             expressed in plants.
PP2A structure




Structural subunit A; Variable subunit B (B’, B’’, B’’’);
Catalytic subunit C
PP2Ac Function




 CTR 1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in
Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinase.
              (Kieber et al., Cell, 1993, 72: 427-441)
Expression of TaPP2Ac-1
Overexpression of transgenic TaPP2Ac-1
 tobacco under water stress condition
     Before water stress           Water stress 12 d




 WT         GFP     TaPP2Ac   WT       GFP      TaPP2Ac

     Water stress 18 d             Water stress 24 d




WT        GFP      TaPP2Ac    WT        GFP      TaPP2Ac
Transgenic TaPP2Ac-1 tobacco plants enhance
    drought tolerance under water deficit




          Time of drought stress (d)                     Physiological trait


   RWC: relative water content; MSI: membrane stability index;
   WRA: water retention ability; WUE: water use efficiency
DT of transgenic TaPP2Ac-1 Arabidopsis




                               Salt tolerance
                                 WT: wild type
                                 &: transgenic line
                                 P: GFP


                 Xu et al., Annals of Botany. 2007, 99:439-450
Chromosome location of TaPP2Ac-1 by the wild relative
 species and nulli-tetrasomics lines of Chinese Spring




   (A) TaPP2Ac-1-1 with PCR specific primer on A genome;
   (B) TaPP2Ac-1-3 with PCR specific primer on D genome;
   (C) TaPP2Ac-1-2 with PCR specific primer on S genome;
   (D) TaPP2Ac-1-2 with PCR-RFLP (TaqI) on S genome.

   M: DNA marker; H: Hanxuan 10; L: Lumai 14; O: Opata 85; W: W7984;
   AB: Triticun durum DS107(AABB); A: T. urartu UR203(AA); B: Ae.speltoides 2046(SS);
   D: T.tauschii Y2009(DD); CS: Chinese Spring; N4AT4B, N4AT4D, N4BT4D and N4DT4B:
   nulli-tetrasomics lines of CS.
4D
                                                                          M: DNA marker
                                                                          O: Opata85
                                                                          W: W7984




Schematic illustration of PCR-RFLP product of
 specific-sequence of D genome between two
           parents of RIL population

            EcoR V                 Hind III               Noc I

                                                   ABD
     ABD




                            ABD




                                                         AB
           AB




                                  AB




                                                                      D
                                               D
                        D




                                       A




                                                              A
                A




                                           S




                                                                  S
                    S




   Three copies of TaPP2Ac was identified in
     hexaploid wheat by Southern Blotting

                Map of TaPP2Ac-1 on chromosome 4DL
Case 2: TaABC1L mapping in RILs




   Genetic mapping of TaABC1L gene based
     on CAPS marker and AS-PCR marker
                      Wang et al., JXB, 2011, 62:1299-1311
Case 3: TaSnRK2.7 Cloning, location and functional
analysis of a gene involved in abiotic-stressed responses




      Minimal ABA signaling pathway                                     Structure prediction
a. In the absence of ABA, the phosphatase PP2C is free to           10-33: Protein kinases ATP-binding
inhibit autophosphorylation of a family of SnRK2 kinases.                region signature
b. ABA enables the PYR/PYL/RCAR family of proteins to bind to      119-131: Serine/Threonine protein kinases
and sequester PP2C. This relieves inhibition on SnRK2, which              active-site signature
becomes auto-activated and can subsequently phosphorylate
and activate downstream transcription factors (ABFs) to initiate
transcription at ABA-responsive promoter elements (ABREs).
(Sheard and Zheng, 2009. Nature 462, 575-576)
Southern blotting
                                         One copy of TaSnRK2.7 might exist in each of
                                            the three genomes of common wheat.




                                               Chromosome location
Phylogenetic tree of TaSnRK2.7 and             of TaSnRK2.7-A copy
 SnRK2s from other plant species
                                               Phosphorus utilization efficiency
TaSnRK2.7 was clustered in subclass I,         Accumulation efficiency of stem
bootstrap values are in percentages.           water-soluble carbohydrates

                                         Zhang et al., Gene, 2011, 478:28-34
TaSnRK2.7 was expressed strongly in seedling
                              roots, weakly in booting spindles, and marginally
                              in seedling leaves and heading spikes.




                                              The expression levels of
                                              TaSnRK2.7 increased
                                              significantly under salt,
                                              PEG and cold stress
                                              conditions, but might be
                                              not activated by ABA.




Expression patterns of TaSnRK2.7 in various tissues (A)
      and in response to various treatments (B)
Subcellular localization
                            TaSnRK2.7-GFP was present in the
                            cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus




Stress tolerance assays
     of TaSnRK2.7
   over-expressing
transgenic Arabidopsis




 Zhang et al., JXB, 2011,
 62:975-988
Drought tolerant
                                         Drought sensitive




Phylogenetic tree representing TaSnRK2.7 haplotype
      relationship among 50 wheat accessions
                          Zhang et al., Gene, 2011, 478:28-34
Case 4: Ta6-SFT Cloning, location and functional
 analysis of a gene involved in fructan synthesis

                                   6-SFT                     1-FFT
             levan neoseries                6G-kestotriose              inulin neoseries
                    β(2-1)                                                     β(2-1)
                                                                 6G-FFT
         6-SFT                   6-SFT             1-SST                    1-FFT
levan            6-kestotriose           SUCROSE               1-kestotriose        inulin
β(2-1)                                                                              β(2-1)
                                                       6-SFT
                                         6-SFT                 1-FFT
             mixed-type levan                    bifurcose             mixed-type levan
             β(2-1) and β(2-6)                           6-SFT         β(2-1) and β(2-6)
                                                 FEH
                                                         1-FFT
                                                   levan
                                                   β(2-6)
                                 Model for fructan synthesis
 The fructan class of water soluble carbohydrates has been assigned a possible
 role in conferring tolerance to drought. 6-SFT is capable of producing 6-kestose
 as well as elongating 6-kestose and 1-kestose and producing both levan and
 branched fructan.(Vijn et al., Plant Physiology, 1999, 120, 351-359)
Specific primer design based on the
polymorphism in the sequencing of gene 6-SFT

                        10            20           30          40            50

 6-SFT-A1   TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGCGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC
 6-SFT-A2   TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGGGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC
 6-SFT-D1   TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGCGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC


                         550               560           570           580               590

 6-SFT-A1    ACGGGATCTCTCTCT--AGGCATAATCAAAA----TTGCTTAACTCACACCAA
 6-SFT-A2    ACGGGATCTCTCTCTCTAGACATAATCAAAAGGGATTGTTTAACTCACACCAA
 6-SFT-D1    ACGGGATCTCTCTCT--AGACATAATCAAAA----TTGCTTAACTCGCACCAA

                                                   6-SFT-A2 specific primer

                 3380          3390         3400        3410        3420          3430

 6-SFT-A1   TGTCACTGTGAACTACAGTATATTACTTTGTTGGGCGTAGAATCGATATAGTTTGGGTGGGTGG
 6-SFT-A2   TGTCATAGTGAACT-----ATATTACTTTGTTGGGCGTAGAATCAATATAGTTTGAGTGGGTGG
 6-SFT-D1   TGTCACAGTGAACTA-----TATTACTTTGTTGGGTGTAGGATCGATATAGTTTGGGTGGGTGG


            6-SFT-A1 specific primer
                                 6-SFT-D1 specific primer

 Three copies for 6-SFT were detected in wheat. Two copies were located
 on genome A, one on genome D.
Single nucleotide mutation in 6-SFT-A1
   No.    Site   Location    Type       Change      Amino acid change
    1     116      exon1      SNP         C/T
    2     333     intron1     SNP         C/G
    3     541     intron2     SNP         G/C
    4     563     intron2     SNP         T/A
    5     1053    intron2     SNP         A/G
    6     1609     exon3      SNP         A/G
    7     1727     exon3      SNP         A/G            Asn /Asp
    8     1781     exon3      SNP         A/G            Thr/Ala
    9     1783     exon3      SNP         A/G
   10     1831     exon3      SNP         T/C
   11     2140    intron3     SNP         G/C
   12     2157    intron3     SNP         G/T
   13     2311    intron3     SNP         C/T
   14     2358    intron3     Indel       T/0
Among 30 hexaploid cultivars, 14 polymorphism sites in 6-SFT-A1 gene
nucleotide sequences were identified, which included 13 SNPs and 1 InDel.
6-SFT-A1 mapping
                              1781 bp G/A




                                   3269 bp

                              MluⅠdigest
                                                                                              Wu et al.
          M   G   A   G   G    G     G   G     G   G   G   Y   N                              2010, 2011


3000 bp
2000 bp

1200 bp


                  Segregation 6-SFT-A1 of in RILs                  Linkage map of 6-SFT-A1 on 4A
                    (Yanzhan 1×Neixiang 188)                         (Yanzhan 1×Neixiang 188)

        The CAPS marker was developed based on the SNP at 1781 bp. 6-SFT-A1
      was mapped on chromosome 4A. QTLs for plant height, 1000-grain weight
      were located in 6-SFT-A1 region (Wu et al., 2010, JXB; 2011, PLoS ONE).
                                             Yue et al., Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2011, 44:2216-2224
Phylogenetic tree representing the haplotype
relationship of 6-SFT-A1


                                                                  Hapl Ⅰ




                                                                  Hapl Ⅱ




                                                                  Hapl Ⅲ




Three haplotypes were identified using the 34 wheat germplasm. Haplotype I
was mainly detected among wheat accessions showing mid-drought resistance
and drought susceptiple. Haplotype III was found in the most of high-resistant
and resistant wheat germplasm.
The high correlation between seedling biomass under
   drought stress and the molecular marker was
identified, which was designed based on the specific
        SNP/InDel in Haplotype III of 6-SFT-A1




         CK       T




      Well-watered (CK)       Drought stress (T)
Agronomic traits associated with 6-SFT-A1 in
   a historical population with 154 accessions

Environment        Trait           Hap I      Hap III    P-Value R2(%)
Rain-fed       Peduncle length    7.4±1.0     8.0±1.4    0.0045   7.63
                Plant height     79.2±13.2   88.1±14.3   0.0058   5.60
Well-watered   Peduncle length   24.9±3.6    27.0±4.2    0.0001   11.02
                Plant height     82.6±6.4    85.0±5.4    0.0337   3.93
Single nucleotide polymorphism in 6-SFT-A2
No.   Site   Location   Type    Change   Hapl I   Hapl II   Hapl III
1     600    Intron 2   SNP      G/A       G        G          A
2     730    Intron 2   SNP      T/C       T        C          T
3     807    Intron 2   SNP      T/A       C        A          C
4     858    Intron 2   SNP      C/A       C        C          A
5     1207   Exon 3     SNP      G/A       G        A          A
6     1237   Exon 3     SNP      A/T       A        C          T
7     1591   Exon 3     SNP      C/T       C        C          T
8     1870   Exon 3     SNP      G/A       G        G          A
9     2053   Intron 3   Indel    T/0       T        0          T
10    2056   Intron 3   Indel    0/C       0        C          0
11    2546   Exon 4     SNP      C/T       C        C          T
12    2918   Exon 4     SNP      G/C       G        G          C
13    2951   Exon 4     SNP      G/A       G        A          G
Molecular marker design for 6-SFT-A2

                                                              4A
              1870bp G/A                2951bp G/A




                      2660b
  Mbo II Digest       p       Msg I Digest

     G G G A G G              G   G G G G A




     +            -           +                  -
Hapl Ⅰ       +                               +
Hapl Ⅱ       +                               -       Linkage map of 6-SFT-A2
Hapl Ⅲ       -                               +          on chromosome 4A
                                                     (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14)
Phylogenetic tree representing the
haplotype relationship of 6-SFT-A2


                                     HaplⅡ




                    HaplⅠ



                                     Hapl Ⅲ
Thousand grain weights of DHLs with
            two 6-SFT-A2 haplotypes
           50




                                                  **
                                                             *

                         **




                                                                             **
                                                                    **
           45




                                         **
           40    *               *
           35
           30
  TGW(g)




           25
           20
           15
           10
            5
            0
                2001
                2001     2005
                         2005   2006H
                                2006DS    2006S
                                         2006WW   2009H
                                                  2009DS   2009S
                                                           2009WW    2010H
                                                                    2010DS    2010S
                                                                             2010WW

                       Hapl I (Hanxuan 10)             Hapl III (Lumai 14)
Thousand grain weight (TGW) of doubled haploid lines (DHLs) with
Hapl III of 6-SFT-A2 is significant higher than that of Hapl I under
different water regimes in five years.
TGW of three haplotypes of 6-SFT-A2 in
           a historic population
   Year    Haplotype      TGW (g)      P-Value    R2 (%)
               Ⅰ          34.8±4.8     0.0397*      4.79
   2008        Ⅱ          33.0±5.6
               Ⅲ          35.6±4.9
               Ⅰ          38.1±5.3     0.0310*      5.12
   2009        Ⅱ          37.0±5.7
               Ⅲ          39.7±5.5

Hapl III of 6-SFT-A2 is associated with higher thousand grain
weight in the historic population consisted of 154 accessions.
Single nucleotide polymorphism in 6-SFT-D

                C          A                         G            C
                A          G                         A            T



               475        841                       2243         2850



        Haplotype        475 bp        841 bp       2243 bp           2850 bp
           Ⅰ                C             A              G                   C
           Ⅱ                C             A              G                   T
           Ⅲ                A             G              A                   C

               C C C C   C T C T   C T C T C   T C C C   C   C C T C T   C
Phylogenetic tree representing the
haplotype relationship of 6-SFT-D



                               HaplⅠ




                              HaplⅡ



                              Hapl Ⅲ
HaplⅠ of 6-SFT-D is a favourable haplotype
    for TGW in a historical population

                  50
                  45
                               *
                  40
                                                   *
                  35                                              Ⅰ
         TGW(g)   30
                                                                  Ⅱ
                  25
                  20
                  15
                  10
                   5
                   0
                              2009                2010


       Year            Haplotype     TGW (g)           P-Value R2(%)
       2009               Ⅰ          40.4 ± 4.6          0.0351       2.46
                          Ⅱ          38.3 ± 5.7
       2010               Ⅰ          34.5 ± 7.4          0.0385       1.94
                          Ⅱ          31.7 ± 6.7
2008H                                                    2008S

     50                                                               45

     45                                                               40
     40
                                                                      35
     35
                                                                      30
     30

     25                                                               25
            I+I     I+II    II+I           II+II   III+I    III+II         I+I   I+II   II+I           II+II   III+I   III+II


                              2009H                                                            2009S

50                                                                    46
                                                                      44
45
                                                                      42
40                                                                    40
                                                                      38
35                                                                    36
                                                                      34
30
                                                                      32
25                                                                    30
          I+I     I+II     II+I           II+II    III+I    III+II         I+I   I+II   II+I           II+II   III+I   III+II




                                  2010H                                                    2010S

 50                                                                   50

 45                                                                   45

 40                                                                   40

 35                                                                   35

 30                                                                   30

 25                                                                   25
           I+I     I+II     II+I           II+II    III+I    III+II        I+I   I+II   II+I           II+II   III+I   III+II
TGW in genotypes with different haplotype
    combinations of 6-SFT-A2 and 6-SFT-D
      Haplotype*             2008D          2008W          2009D        2009W
            I+I               38.50          37.34          38.64        40.01
           I+II               36.77          35.01          34.80        37.96
           II+I               37.30          34.63          37.89        39.65
           II+II              35.55          35.36          38.58        38.49
          III+I               39.46          37.18          39.55        40.60
          III+II              40.39          36.58          39.31        38.37
     * Combines   of three haplotypes of 6-SFT-A2 and two haplotypes of 6-SFT-D.


Hapl Ⅲ of 6-SFT-A2 and HaplⅠ of 6-SFT-D are favourable
hyplotypes for increasing grain weight, their combination
is optimum for improving grain weight in wheat.
Relationship between TGW and
       water soluble carbohydrate in stem


                               CK



                             Cut spike



                              0.3% KI
                            (200 mL/m2)
Early grain filling stage                 Middle grain filling stage
Analysis of thousand grain weight (TGW)
                                                              Reduction (CK – KI)
   Env.        Treatment   Range (g)        Mean±SD
                                                         Max (g) Min (g)   Mean±SD
Well-watered      CK       27.50-49.76      39.42±5.06
                                                          29.40   4.62     16.14±5.53
                  KI       11.13-38.46      23.28±5.23
  Rain-fed        CK       26.63-48.13      36.95±4.60
                                                          24.87   1.23     7.82±5.82
                  KI       14.78-43.58      29.13±6.16

                                TGWKI
       Well-watered:                         ×100% = 59.32%
                               TGWcontrol
                               TGWKI
               Rain-fed:      TGWcontrol    × 100% = 79.13%

   Stem-reserved WSC significantly contributes to TGW. The
   contribution under the drought stress condition is higher
   significantly than that under well-watered condition.
WSC QTL for stem WSC in DH population
      QTLs
58 additive, 34 pairs Additive QTL; contribution rate 36.80%
                      epistatic           Epistatic     Total
    Trait
(peduncle), 49.57% (secondR2(%) Number (lower section)
                 Number      section), 49.24% R2(%)     (%)
   Peduncle             21       31.93        9        4.87      36.80
TGW QTL
 Second section         17       40.97       10        8.60      49.57
 Lower section
20 additive, 17   pairs 20
                        epistatic37.73
                                  QTL;   contribution 11.51 66.36%
                                             15       rate       49.24


       QTLs for TGW in DH population
22 common intervals of WSC QTL and TGW QTL.
                 Additive          Epistatic       Total
(1A:Stage
     WMC59; 1B: WMC156, CWM65, A1133-370, WMC269.2; 1D:
             Number     R2(%) Number     R2(%)      (%)
WMC222; 2B: WMC441; 2D: WMC453.1, Xgwm539, A4233-175,
      2         4        6.99    6         4.02    11.01
WMC41; 3A: Xgwm391; 4A: A3446-205; 5A: Xgwm156, Xgwm595; 5B:
      3         4        5.13    5         3.82     8.95
      4         4       13.03    1         3.08    16.11
Xgwm67, Xgwm213, Xgwm499, WMC380; 6A: CWM487; 7A: A3446-
280, A2454-280) 7
      5                 22.69    5         6.48    29.17
Lower section, WSC
       additive QTL, stage 5




       Lower section, WSC
       epistatic QTL, stage 3
                                TGW epistatic QTL, stage 4
       Lower section, WSC
       epistatic QTL, stage 5
                                TGW additive QTL, stage 2, 3, 4

       Second section, WSC
       epistatic QTL, stage 1

                                TGW epistatic QTL, stage 5
       Lower section, WSC
       epistatic QTL, stage 5




QTL for WSC and TGW on chromosome 4A
6-SFT-A2 mapping
                                   4A                 4A

               4A
  H10 L14




                                                              TGW


                                                               TGW epistatic
                                                               QTL, stage 5




Linkage map of 6-SFT-A2 on 4A   Su et al., 2009   Yang et al., 2007
  (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14)         Plant Science     Genetics
Summary
A number of QTLs and QTL clusters for drought
 tolerance have been identified by linkage
 mapping.
A few of functional markers have been developed.
Some useful alleles of target genes/QTLs were
 tested in common wheat collections.
Few markers were corresponding in diversity
  genetic backgrounds.
In the Future

 To integrate the QTLs and functional markers
  mapped in multi-population
 To identify beneficial alleles in germplasm
  resources by association mapping of
  candidate genes/QTLs
 To introgress DT into elite wheat backgrounds
  by molecular marker assisted recurrent
  selection
Acknowledgements
                                  Collabrators
                                  Yuchen DONG
                                  Jizeng JIA
                                  Xueyong ZHANG
                                  Xiuying KONG
                                  Chenyang HAO




Financial Support
National High Tech Program
National Key Program for Basic Research
Thank you!
“There’s no single gene that’s going to be the
panacea to our drought problem. We’re trying
to cherry-pick the various mechanisms and
recombine them into one elite cultivar.”

 --- Dr. Ryan Whitford, a scientist with the
ACPFG’s Drought Focus Group, 2011
果聚糖的作用
     Water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) in wheat stem is mainly composed of
fructans, sucrose, glucose and fructose, with fructans being the major
component at the late stage of the WSC accumulation phase.
  At the stage of maximum WSC content, fructans represented 85% of the
WSC in wheat stem internodes.
     Fructan’s high water solubility: osmotic adjustment.
     Fructan as a source of hexose sugars: allow continued leaf expansion
      during periods of drought.
     Direct protective effects of fructan: membrane stabilization.




                            Bolouri-Moghaddam, et al., 2010, FEBS J., 277, 2022-2037

Más contenido relacionado

Más de FOODCROPS

Más de FOODCROPS (20)

2017. Phương pháp backcrossing giả định quy tụ nhanh chống các tính trạng kin...
2017. Phương pháp backcrossing giả định quy tụ nhanh chống các tính trạng kin...2017. Phương pháp backcrossing giả định quy tụ nhanh chống các tính trạng kin...
2017. Phương pháp backcrossing giả định quy tụ nhanh chống các tính trạng kin...
 
2017. ung dung tin sinh xac dinh tinh chong chiu cay trong (c d ha) [compatib...
2017. ung dung tin sinh xac dinh tinh chong chiu cay trong (c d ha) [compatib...2017. ung dung tin sinh xac dinh tinh chong chiu cay trong (c d ha) [compatib...
2017. ung dung tin sinh xac dinh tinh chong chiu cay trong (c d ha) [compatib...
 
2017. Giới thiệu giống lúa CNC11
2017. Giới thiệu giống lúa CNC112017. Giới thiệu giống lúa CNC11
2017. Giới thiệu giống lúa CNC11
 
2017. TS Cao Lệ Quyên. Nghiên cứu phân lập và chuyển gen liên quan đến tính c...
2017. TS Cao Lệ Quyên. Nghiên cứu phân lập và chuyển gen liên quan đến tính c...2017. TS Cao Lệ Quyên. Nghiên cứu phân lập và chuyển gen liên quan đến tính c...
2017. TS Cao Lệ Quyên. Nghiên cứu phân lập và chuyển gen liên quan đến tính c...
 
2017. Nhìn về quá khứ định hướng tương lai
2017.  Nhìn về quá khứ định hướng tương lai2017.  Nhìn về quá khứ định hướng tương lai
2017. Nhìn về quá khứ định hướng tương lai
 
2017. TS Cồ Thị Thuỳ Vân. Một số kết quả nổi bật và định hướng nghiên cứu về ...
2017. TS Cồ Thị Thuỳ Vân. Một số kết quả nổi bật và định hướng nghiên cứu về ...2017. TS Cồ Thị Thuỳ Vân. Một số kết quả nổi bật và định hướng nghiên cứu về ...
2017. TS Cồ Thị Thuỳ Vân. Một số kết quả nổi bật và định hướng nghiên cứu về ...
 
2017. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan. Nghiên cứu nhận dạng phân tử một số nguồn gen đậu ...
2017. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan. Nghiên cứu nhận dạng phân tử một số nguồn gen đậu ...2017. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan. Nghiên cứu nhận dạng phân tử một số nguồn gen đậu ...
2017. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan. Nghiên cứu nhận dạng phân tử một số nguồn gen đậu ...
 
2017. Con đường từ phân tích thực tiễn đến phòng thí nghiệm
2017. Con đường từ phân tích thực tiễn đến phòng thí nghiệm2017. Con đường từ phân tích thực tiễn đến phòng thí nghiệm
2017. Con đường từ phân tích thực tiễn đến phòng thí nghiệm
 
2017. TS Nguyễn Văn Cửu. Xác định đặc tính gen chống chịu ngập ở lúa vùng Đô...
2017.  TS Nguyễn Văn Cửu. Xác định đặc tính gen chống chịu ngập ở lúa vùng Đô...2017.  TS Nguyễn Văn Cửu. Xác định đặc tính gen chống chịu ngập ở lúa vùng Đô...
2017. TS Nguyễn Văn Cửu. Xác định đặc tính gen chống chịu ngập ở lúa vùng Đô...
 
2017. TS Đồng Thị Kim Cúc. Giới thiệu một số giống lạc mới
2017. TS Đồng Thị Kim Cúc. Giới thiệu một số giống lạc mới 2017. TS Đồng Thị Kim Cúc. Giới thiệu một số giống lạc mới
2017. TS Đồng Thị Kim Cúc. Giới thiệu một số giống lạc mới
 
2015. ming tsair chan. the application of plant transformation
2015. ming tsair chan. the application of plant transformation2015. ming tsair chan. the application of plant transformation
2015. ming tsair chan. the application of plant transformation
 
2007. stephen chanock. technologic issues in gwas and follow up studies
2007. stephen chanock. technologic issues in gwas and follow up studies2007. stephen chanock. technologic issues in gwas and follow up studies
2007. stephen chanock. technologic issues in gwas and follow up studies
 
2016. daisuke tsugama. next generation sequencing (ngs) for plant research
2016. daisuke tsugama. next generation sequencing (ngs) for plant research2016. daisuke tsugama. next generation sequencing (ngs) for plant research
2016. daisuke tsugama. next generation sequencing (ngs) for plant research
 
2017. Genome học hiện trạng và triển vọng
2017. Genome học hiện trạng và triển vọng2017. Genome học hiện trạng và triển vọng
2017. Genome học hiện trạng và triển vọng
 
2017. PGS.TS Phạm Xuân Hội. Công nghệ chỉnh sửa hệ gen thành tựu và triển vọng
2017. PGS.TS Phạm Xuân Hội. Công nghệ chỉnh sửa hệ gen thành tựu và triển vọng2017. PGS.TS Phạm Xuân Hội. Công nghệ chỉnh sửa hệ gen thành tựu và triển vọng
2017. PGS.TS Phạm Xuân Hội. Công nghệ chỉnh sửa hệ gen thành tựu và triển vọng
 
2017. Ts hoàng thị giang. nghiên cứu chức năng của một số gen liên quan đến s...
2017. Ts hoàng thị giang. nghiên cứu chức năng của một số gen liên quan đến s...2017. Ts hoàng thị giang. nghiên cứu chức năng của một số gen liên quan đến s...
2017. Ts hoàng thị giang. nghiên cứu chức năng của một số gen liên quan đến s...
 
2017. Sarah M Potts. Identification of QTL and candidate genes for plant dens...
2017. Sarah M Potts. Identification of QTL and candidate genes for plant dens...2017. Sarah M Potts. Identification of QTL and candidate genes for plant dens...
2017. Sarah M Potts. Identification of QTL and candidate genes for plant dens...
 
2017. ts bùi minh trí. xác định tỷ lệ và cường độ chiếu sáng tối ưu từ đền le...
2017. ts bùi minh trí. xác định tỷ lệ và cường độ chiếu sáng tối ưu từ đền le...2017. ts bùi minh trí. xác định tỷ lệ và cường độ chiếu sáng tối ưu từ đền le...
2017. ts bùi minh trí. xác định tỷ lệ và cường độ chiếu sáng tối ưu từ đền le...
 
2017. nguyễn thị xuân trang. khảo sát khả năng chịu mặn muối na cl trong điều...
2017. nguyễn thị xuân trang. khảo sát khả năng chịu mặn muối na cl trong điều...2017. nguyễn thị xuân trang. khảo sát khả năng chịu mặn muối na cl trong điều...
2017. nguyễn thị xuân trang. khảo sát khả năng chịu mặn muối na cl trong điều...
 
2017. bùi thị mỹ hồng. ảnh hưởng của các chất điều hòa sinh trưởng thực vật đ...
2017. bùi thị mỹ hồng. ảnh hưởng của các chất điều hòa sinh trưởng thực vật đ...2017. bùi thị mỹ hồng. ảnh hưởng của các chất điều hòa sinh trưởng thực vật đ...
2017. bùi thị mỹ hồng. ảnh hưởng của các chất điều hòa sinh trưởng thực vật đ...
 

Último

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 

Último (20)

Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptxThird Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
Third Battle of Panipat detailed notes.pptx
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 

Discovering favourable gene resources for crop improvement

  • 1. Development of Agricultural Science Discovering Favourable Gene Resources for Crop Improvement Ruilian Jing jingrl@caas.net.cn The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement/Institute of Crop Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Specific Topic for Student Abroad • Oct. 20, 2011
  • 2. Outline Why ? Where ? How ?  Phenotyping  Genotyping  Utilization
  • 3. Feeding the 9 billion people expected to inhabit our planet by 2050 will be an unprecedented challenge Special issue 2010 Special issue 2007 Special issue 2003 Special issue 2008
  • 4. “Take one world already being exhausted by 6 billion people. Find the ingredients to feed another 2 billion people. Add demand for more food, more animal feed and more fuel. Use only the same amount of water the planet has had since creation. And don’t forget to restore the environment that sustains us. Stir very carefully.” Margaret Catley-Carlson 2008-2009 Chair of World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on Water Security World Economic Forum, Davos January 2009
  • 5. Area-Total yield-Yield per unit of cereal crops in China during 1952-2008 Area (10 M ha.) Total yield (100 M ton) Unit yield (ton·ha-1) 1950’ 1960’-1990’ 1998- Zhensheng Li
  • 6. Abiotic & biotic stresses on crop plants Drought, Waterlogging/Submergence Heat, Cold Mineral deficiency/Mineral toxicity Salinity …… Diseases and Insect pests http://www.plantstress.com
  • 7. To keep pace with food consumer demand, muti-favourable genes should be pyramided in crop cultivars. To discover favourable gene resources for improving crop plants.
  • 8.  The “green revolution gene” is an allele of gene which control plant height.  0nly a base pair difference between wild type and mutant type.  Finding and utilization of this one base mutation resulted in a “Green Revolution” Nature, 1999, 400: 256-261
  • 9. Nature allele variation is widely present in plant germplasm. Difference of fruit weight of tomato between wild type and cultivar type is a few base pair change in the promoter region of gene fw2.2. Science, 2000, 289: 85-88
  • 10. Hybrid rice successful utilization in China due to a cytoplasmic male sterility gene discovered in wild rice Wild rice Hybrid rice
  • 11. Soybean is originated from China. Wild soybean is high diversity.
  • 12. Wild rice 野生稻聚群 Salsa (Suaeda heteroptera) 碱蓬(又名盐蒿)
  • 13. Hexaploid Agropyron 六倍体冰草 (Xinjiang) Psathyrostachys 陕西华山新麦草 (Shaanxi)
  • 15. National Long- term Genebank Founded in 1986 -18℃, RH≤50%±7% 712 Species; 397,000 accessions
  • 17. Distribution of 32 National Germplasm Nursries 29 黑龙江 吉林 25 19 14 蒙 辽宁 24 新 疆 9 北京 23 内 26 Ⅰ 22 甘 Ⅲ 32 山 天津 河 宁 17 北 肃 陕 西 山东 Ⅱ 夏 12 青 海 28 16 西 10 江苏 河 南 13  安 7 西 藏 徽 上海 湖北 5 4 四 川 重庆 18 6 11 浙 江 江 8 湖 南 西 福 21 贵 州 建 台 15 云 南 广 东 湾 27 广 西 20 1  3 图例: 2  资源库 30 南海诸岛  资源圃 海南  31
  • 18. Geographic distribution of crop germplasm in China Wheat Rice Soybean
  • 19. National Germplasm Nursry: Grape, Jujube 10 species, 636 accessions
  • 20. National Germplasm Nursry: perennial grasses 147 species, 432 accessions 国家内蒙多年生牧草圃:147个种、432份
  • 22. Germplasm Resources ? ? Gene Resources ? ? ? ? How can we discover beneficial genes? More than 7 million accessions have been collected and conserved in the germplasm banks in the world. How to find the favourable genes from the huge number of plant germplasm resources for plant breeding?
  • 23. Rice genome sequencing and functional genomics 植物功能基因组学研究进展迅速 完成了水稻基因组测序 为分离和发掘新基因奠定了基础 2002
  • 24. Forward- vs. reverse-genetics approaches QTL mapping, Association mapping, Positional cloning, Mutagenesis, etc. Forward genetics Candidate Reverse genetics sequence Phenotype Genotype Genetic engineering, RNAi, TILLING, Insertional mutagenesis, etc.
  • 25. Phenotyping --- base for discovering genes (Case: drought tolerance)
  • 26. An unexpectedly abrupt decline in the supply of water for China’s farmers poses a rising threat to world food security. WORLD•WATCH July/August 1998
  • 27. China: Precipitation About 50% of land area is arid and semi-arid in China, where 6 667 000 ha of rainfed wheat are grown with low and variable yield. Developing drought-tolerant cultivars is an efficient way to stabilize wheat production and ensure food security in China and the world.
  • 28. Total drought area 10.5 Mha 8.8 Mha Average year: 1.7 Mha drought area Provinces suffered from drought stress in the early spring 2009
  • 29. Qingtu Lake in Min Qin, from lake to desert in 40 years Reeds and remaining shells
  • 31. The Aral Sea in Central Asia, once the 4th largest saline water, has shrunk by 75% in surface area since 1960s
  • 32. The Chad Lake in central africa, once the 6th largest lake in the world, 90% reduction in size from 1972 to 2006
  • 33. The Lake Faguibine in Mali, change from 1974 to 2006
  • 34. Drought seriously limits crop production in many areas of the world, especially in China. More than 70% water is used in the crop production in China.  Water shortage  Big population Crop drought-tolerance improvement is a challenging task for breeders. Discover and use drought-tolerant gene resources in the crop breeding can contribute to improvement for water-limited environments.
  • 35. Water shortage in agriculture ‘Blue Revolution – more crop for every drop’ Norman E. Borlaug Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 1970
  • 36. 1. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of water stress responses Difference in dehydration tolerance and drought tolerance • The former is the capability to maintain functions and minimize damages under dehydration . In reality, crop plants cannot survive for long under prolonged dehydration. What we see are a short-term stress responses. • The later is the ability to grow and yield under less soil moisture. This should be the trait of crops in drought-prone areas.
  • 37.  How can plant maintain turgidity with declining soil water availability? The molecular details about how the metabolic genes are regulated in responses?  How can plant maintain their membrane integrity under oxidative stress which is a secondary stress derived from water stress?  How are the other physiological functions maintained or regulated as an integrative response to water stress?
  • 38. 2. Breeding cultivars to cope with specific objectives Drought breeding should be localized with specific objectives to specific areas, such as less irrigation, rainfed in semi-arid. Conventional breeding is time consuming and labor costly since it is a natural selection under drought condition. However, large scale gene recombination can be easily achieved.
  • 39. 2. Breeding cultivars to cope with specific objectives Molecular breeding is more efficient but the available magic drought-resistant genes are very limited.  Genes for root traits should be tapped.  Drought tolerance is fundamentally related to the capability to maintain water balance, much less to the ability to tolerate dehydration.
  • 40. Whole-plant responses to drought stress Left: long-term or acclimation responses; right: short-term responses (Chaves, et al., 2003)
  • 41. Sensing, signalling and cell-level responses to drought stress  ABA-mediated responses  Non-ABA-mediated responses  Other mechanisms (Chaves, et al., 2003)
  • 42. Dissecting yield into bite size “physiological markers” Traits G-C G-C T-A T-A G-C Y G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A T-A G-C I • Ground cover G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A E • Plant height G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A T-A G-C • Root depth G-C T-A L • Transpiration efficiency T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C T-A D • Stem carbohydrates G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A T-A G-C • Spike photosynthesis G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A • …… T-A G-C P G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A O T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C T-A T T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C G-C T-A E • Interception of radiation T-A G-C T-A T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C N • Canopy cooling T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C T-A T-A T • Membrane thermostability T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C G-C T-A G-C • Photoprotection G-C T-A T-A G-C T-A I • …… G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A T-A G-C A G-C T-A G-C T-A G-C T-A T-A L G-C T-A Environment G-C Genes T-A G-C T-A M Reynolds, 2010
  • 43. Early generation selection methodologies Visual selection ++ Leaf porometry Canopy temperature Spectral reflectance
  • 44. Factors affecting Canopy Temperature Depression (CTD) in plants Radiation Biological Environmental Clouds Partitioning o (T C) H2O CTD Evaporation Metabolism Wind Vascular Transport H2O (soil water availability) (M Reynolds, 2001)
  • 45. 5500 Grain yield (kg/ha) 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 Canopy temperature depression (oC) The relationship of grain yield to CTD, mean of 2 sowings dates, Tlaltizapán, 1992-93, 23 genotypes. (Amani, Fischer and Reynolds, 1996)
  • 46. Selection for canopy temperature: to enrich favourable alleles before yield testing
  • 47. Use of CTD in early generation selection - F4 bulks under drought stress (R. Trethowan) - Following visual selection, CTD scores used to influence gene frequency 29 28.5 C a n o p y te m p p o s t 28 27.5 flo w e rin g 27 26.5 26 25.5 25 24.5 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Canopy temperature vegetative
  • 48. Complementing breeder selection with canopy temperature (Van Ginkel et al., 2008) 14 BREEDER 12 BREEDER+CTD Individual number 10 8 6 4 2 0 6.3 6.8 7.3 7.8 8.3 Yield (t/ha)
  • 49. Sampling soil core To sample roots To measure soil moisture profiles CIMMYT
  • 50. Models to quantify yield under abiotic stress Drought yield = Water Uptake x WUE x HI (partitioning) (Passioura, 1977) Irrigated yield = Light Interception x RUE x HI (partitioning) WUE: water use efficiency RUE: radiation use efficiency HI: harvest index
  • 51. Generic model of stress adaptation under drought & heat Photo-protection Water use efficiency (WUE) & Radiation use efficiency (RUE) Pigments for dissipation of excess light energy, e.g. •Transpiration efficiency (drought only) carotenoids measured • CID using spectral reflectance •Heat tolerant metabolism (growth rate) (RARSc) • Stay green (CHL) • CO2 fixation rate (COND) Early growth (pre-grainfill) Access to water by roots (indicated by cooler canopies) • Ground cover: measured with spectral indices (NDVI & WI) • Under drought estimates water use • Growth rate (BMA) • Under hot, irrigated conditions: • Stem carbohydrates (CHO) estimates CO2 fixation and thus radiation use efficiency
  • 52. Physiological breeding: strategic crossing for drought YLD = WU x WUE x HI (Passioura, 1979) Photo-Protection Transpiration Efficiency Leaf morphology WUE of leaf photosynthesis • wax/pubescence • posture/rolling low 12C/13C discrimination Pigments Spike/awn photosynthesis • chl a:b • carotenoids Antioxidants Partitioning (HI) Water Uptake Partitioning to stem Rapid ground cover carbohydrates • protects soil moisture Access to water by roots Harvest index • Ψ leaf • Rht alleles • cool canopy • (osmotic adjustment) (Reynolds & Tuberosa, 2008. COPB)
  • 53. 2001
  • 54. Plant phenotyping methodology Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice www.generationcp.org/ drought_phenotyping 2011
  • 55. Genotyping --- to discover gene resources (Case: drought tolerance)
  • 56. Outline Linkage mapping Association mapping Functional marker mapping Perspective of MAS
  • 57. Evaluation of drought Drought tolerant genotypes tolerance at seedling stage survived in the soil moisture of ~17% relative water content
  • 58. Drought tolerance evaluation in the field 2009 Henan Shanxi Henan
  • 59. Linkage mapping Association mapping Hanxuan 10 × Lumai 14 Historical winter DHLs wheat collection RILs DT QTLs DT QTLs Introgression lines (BC3F3-4) Donor 1 Jinmai 47 × Donor 2 . . . Elite alleles
  • 60. Parents Hanxuan 10 Drought tolerant cultivar grown under rainfed condition in semi-arid region Lumai 14 High yield potential cultivar grown under irrigated condition Hanxuan 10 DH Lines Lumai 14 (Hanxuan 10 × Lumai 14)
  • 61. Water Regime Treatments for Phenotyping Treatment: Rainfed/Drought stress Control: Well watered Traits for QTL Mapping Agronomic traits (coleoptile length, early vigor, heading date, flowering date, plant height, spike number per plant, kernel per spike, spike length, seed setting, thousand-grain weight, plant morphology and grain yield) Physiological traits (stay-green, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf water status, canopy temperature, accumulation and remobilization of stem water-soluble carbohydrates) Anatomical structure (number and area of vascular bundles)
  • 62. QTLs for accumulation and remobilization of stem water-soluble carbohydrates
  • 63. Yang et al., Genetics. 2007, 176: 571-584
  • 64. Integrated mapping of QTLs controlling drought tolerance in wheat S le : 7 re p e a ta tio n F v /F o - W W (1 2 .0 9 % ) (1 7 .4 3 % ~ 2 2 .4 4 % ) R A L V B -D S (1 3 .1 6 % ) H e i (8 .4 9 % ~ 3 1 .0 4 % ) K w e (3 3 .3 9 % ) S le (9 .1 5 % ~ 1 8 .7 3 % ) K g n (1 5 .5 5 % ~ 2 9 .0 6 % ) K w e i (1 4 .0 6 % ) T s p ( 1 0 .0 7 % ~ 1 2 .2 5 ) P y i ( 8 .5 7 % ) H e i ( 9 .3 9 % ~ 2 1 .1 3 % ) P y i (1 0 .6 2 % ~ 1 9 .2 3 % ) S le ( 1 3 .6 2 % ) S s p ( 8 .8 6 % ) N U P - H N 2 (1 4 .0 % ) N U P - L N 1 (6 .0 % ) R P A T V B ( 1 3 .2 3 % ) R D W - H ( 1 1 .0 % ) S le ( 7 .8 % ~ 2 1 .9 7 % ) S p i ( 6 .5 9 ~ 1 0 .3 7 % ) C h lC (1 1 .6 8 % ) K g n ( 2 2 .6 2 % ) N S V B ( 2 1 .3 8 % ) S s p (6 .4 3 % ~ 1 4 .3 8 % ) N T V B ( 2 0 .3 6 % ) S p i (9 .3 7 % ) T s p (8 .0 9 % ~ 3 4 .9 3 % ) S s p (1 0 .8 9 % ~ 3 0 .9 7 % ) N L V B -D S H e i (9 .3 2 % ~ 2 1 .7 9 ) (1 6 .0 5 % ) F m -D S ( 2 6 .5 8 % ) T s p ( 1 5 .7 1 % ~ 2 4 .5 3 % ) F v -D S (2 2 .9 9 % ) H e i ( 2 4 .5 3 % ~ 4 3 .4 5 % ) R F W (1 0 .3 7 % ) N U P -H (4 .3 % )
  • 65. QTL validation in different populations DH (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14) RIL (Opata85×W7984)
  • 66. E1: 2001 Fenyang, Shanxi E2: 2005 Haidian, Beijing E3: 2005 Changping, Beijing DS E4: 2006 Haidian, Beijing E5: 2006 Changping, Beijing Plant height E6: 2001 Fenyang, Shanxi phenotyping E7: 2005 Haidian, Beijing WW E8: 2005 Changping, Beijing E9: 2006 Haidian, Beijing E10: 2006 Changping, Beijing Condition PH ---net increase effect in the given period S1|S0 S2|S1 S3|S2 S4|S3 S5|S4 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Unconditional PH--- accumulated effect
  • 67. QTL mapping Mixed linear model was used to divide genetic effects into additive main effects (a), epistatic main effects (aa) and their environment interaction effects (QE, including ae and aae). Cao et al, 2001
  • 68. QTLs for plant height during ontogeny in DHLs Additive QTLs Epistatic QTL pairs Traits Stages a b c d Number A AE Number AA AAE Unconditional S1 12 12 6 7 7 2 plant height S2 11 11 7 18 18 4 S3 12 12 7 19 19 3 S4 10 10 4 22 22 1 S5 10 10 5 20 20 2 Total 55 55 29 86 86 12 Conditional S1|S0 12 12 6 7 7 2 plant height S2|S1 3 3 3 4 4 3 S3|S2 4 4 3 4 2 3 S4|S3 1 1 1 3 1 2 S5|S4 6 5 5 5 3 3 Total 26 26 18 23 17 13 a QTL number with additive main effects; b QTL number with additive environment interaction effects; c QTL pair number with additive epistatic effects; d QTL pair number with epistatic environment interaction effects.
  • 69. Uneven distributions of PH QTLs on chromosomes Unconditional plant height Conditional plant height Chrom. Homeologous Genome Chrom. Homeologous Genome group group 1A 2 36 1 19 1B 18 51 7 23 1D 2 22 22 1 9 11 2A 8 3 2B 4 1 2D 10 22 6 10 3A 3 1 3B 12 4 3D 3 18 5 4A 5 1 4B 2 2 4D 2 9 2 5 5A 7 3 5B 5 4 5D 1 13 7 6A 6 4 6B 6 4 6D 12 8 7A 5 6 7B 4 1 7D 4 13 2 9 Total 109 53
  • 70. Common QTLs for plant height development between unconditional and conditional analysis in DHLs Stage QTLs Marker interval A AE1 AE2 AE3 AE4 AE5 AE6 AE7 AE8 AE9 AE10 *** ** * S1|S0 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 1.85 -0.83 0.35 0.77 *** * * * S3|S2 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 -0.50 -0.86 0.48 -0.74 0.52 0.39 -0.36 0.74 0.51 -0.54 *** ** * S1 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 1.85 -0.83 0.35 0.77 *** *** *** *** S2 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 3.89 -2.44 1.87 -1.06 2.13 *** *** S3 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 3.02 -1.92 1.03 -0.64 *** *** S4 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 4.70 -0.86 -2.96 0.75 0.83 -0.89 1.28 0.85 *** S5 QPh.cgb-2D.1 WMC453.1-WMC18 2.84 -0.86 0.49
  • 71. 0.5 Component contribution 0.5 Component contribution 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S1| S2| S3 | S4| S5| S1 S3 S2 S4 S5 h^2(A) h^2(AE) h^2(AA) h^2(AAE) Contributions of different genetic effects to plant height during ontogeny in DHLs
  • 72. Rht1 (Cadalen, 1998; QTLs Epi. Huang, 2006; Sourdille, 2003; Liu, 2006; a e ae aa e aae McCartney, 2005) S1 S2 Rht12 (Ellis, 2005) Un. S3 S4 Rht9 (Schnurbusch, 2003; S5 Ellis, 2005) S1 S2 Con. S3 Rht2 (Cadalen,1998; S4 Huang, 2003, 2006; S5 McCartney, 2005; Sourdille, 2003) PH QTL clusters matched up to Rht genes in DHLs
  • 73. Rht8 (Korzun, 1998) Rht5 (Ellis, 2005) Rht13 (Ellis 2005) PH QTL clusters near Rht genes in DHLs
  • 74. (Cadalen et al. 1998) (Ellis, 2005) PH QTL clusters on other chromosomes
  • 75. (McCartney ,2005; Cadalen, 1998; Sourdille, 2003; Quarrie, ,2006) (Schnurbusch, 2003) PH QTL clusters on other chromosomes Wu et al., JXB, 2010, 61: 2923-2937
  • 76. Association analysis of candidate PH QTLs 270 historical winter wheat accessions 60 candidate SSR markers in six chromosome regions Rht8 Rht1 Rht12 Rht9 Rht2 Rht13 Ave. Dis. = 4.7 cM Wheat, Consensus SSR, 2004
  • 77. Associations of plant height developmental behavior and the candidate markers Total of 46 marker-trait associations were detected, among them 13 associations were highly significant (P<0.001). Five loci were also worked in DHLs. 6.5 6.0 5.5 -Log (P)>3 -Lg(P value) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 m 2 2 1 1 m 2 1 3 4 3 3 2 H H H H TC PH PH PH PH PH H PH H -P -P -P -P -P -P -D 5- 9- 9- 2- 5- 5- 09 09 09 09 43 49 49 24 24 30 49 49 43 c1 c1 c1 c1 fd c3 m m m m m fd m ar ar Xc ar ar m w w w w w Xc w Xb Xb Xb Xb Xw Xg Xg Xg Xg Xg Xg Associations -Lg (P) value at different associations
  • 78. 2D PIC 2D 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 23.2 Xgwm261 PH PH4 PH4 2 32.1 Xgwm455 Rht8 (Korzun, 1998) 37.1 Xwmc470 40.7 Xgwm484 PH3 43.1 Xcfd43 PH2 PH3 PH4 DTC2 DTC3 46.7 Xbarc168 PH1 48.2 Xgwm102 cM 63.6 Xgwm249 PH3 PH4 63.7 Xwmc18 65.2 Xcfd17 65.8 Xcfd116 66.7 Xcfd84 67.1 Xwmc144 68.8 Xcfd160 73.1 Xgwm157 81 Xbarc228 DTC4 82.8 Xwmc41 DTC 4 90.9 Xgwm539 Ht= 0.5806
  • 79. 4D PIC 4D 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 28 Xwmc112 PH4 DTCm 32.9 Xcfd23 PHm PHm Rht2 33.1 Xgwm133 PHm DTCm 34.5 Xgwm192 PHm PH1 PH3 Cadalen,1998; Huang, 2003, 2006; McCartney, 2005; Sourdille, 2003 42.9 Xwmc331 cM 54 Xwmc399 PHm PH1 PH2 PH3 PH4 Plant height under well-watered PHm PH1 PH2 PH3 PH4 Plant height under drought-stress DTCm DTC1 DTC2 DTC3 DTC4 Drought tolerance coefficient 78.8 Xcfd233 82 Xgwm194 PH1 Ht= 0.6489 Zhang et al., Planta, 2011 (DOI 10.1007/s00425-011-1434-8)
  • 80. Phenotypic effects of marker alleles Xcfd23-4D Xgwm495-4B A217 A220 A223 A155 A159 A163 A165 A167 A179 A181 10 P la n t h e ig h t a t m a tu r e ( c m ) 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 PH under drought-stress PH under well-watered
  • 81. Allele effect on plant height of associated locus in drought environment Average effect Percentage of effect (%) Locus Allele Effect Typical accession Positive effect Negative effect Positive effect Negative effect Xbarc168 160 + 37.5 中苏68 Zhongsu68 160:174 + 17.8 科遗29 Keyi 29 160:172 + 17.6 庆丰1号 Qingfeng 1 162:174 + 29.2 华北187 Huabei 187 +26.0 0 +34.5 0 Xgwm285 220 - 17.8 西安8号 Xian 8 222 - 13.9 中麦9号 Zhongmai 9 228 - 17.6 鲁麦14 Lumai 14 238 - 3.3 鲁麦1号 Lumai 1 254 - 11.5 衡95观26 Heng 95 Guan 26 256 - 5.0 衡5229 Heng 5229 0 -11.5 0 -11.0 Xgwm126 193 + 20.1 冀麦32 Jimai 32 195 + 32.8 燕大1817 Yanda 817 199 + 12.8 科遗29 Keyi 29 +21.9 0 +29.6 0 Xgwm95 108 - 5.2 太原566 Taiyuan 566 118 - 24.7 陕229 Shan 229 120 - 24.1 豫麦13 Yumai 13 122 - 31.7 西安8号 Xian 8 0 - 21.4 0 - 18.3 Xgwm212 99 - 3.2 矮孟牛Ⅳ型(8057) Aimengniu 103 + 9.9 丹麦1号 Danmai 1 + 9.9 - 3.2 + 10.4 - 3.3 Xwmc396 151 + 14.6 晋麦16 Jinmai 16 153 + 3.2 晋麦44 Jinmai44 157 + 0.4 冀麦32 Jimai 32 510 -2.1 鲁215953 Lu 215953 + 6.0 - 2.1 + 6.7 - 2.4 Wei et al., Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36:895-904
  • 82. Validation of Xwmc349 allelic effect in ILs with Jinmai 47 background Average variance Allele Effect on PH IL No. Range of PH to receptor A99 -12.4 24 -19 ~ +14 0 A103 -11.1 6 -9 ~ +6 -2 Xwmc349 allele: A99(-12.4), A101, A103(-11.1), A105(+6.0)
  • 83. Summary  Plant height is a typically quantitative trait controlled by additive effects and epistatic effects.  A list of marker-PH association was identified in the chromosome regions of PH QTLs or Rht genes detected in DHLs.  Allele effects have to be validated in multi- genetic backgrounds.
  • 84. Flow chart of suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) Wheat seedling Data analysis (-0.5MPa PEG-6000) Test sequences mRNA preparation SSH 1, 6, 12, 24, 48h cDNA synthesis cDNA libraries Rsa I digestion Transformation Adaptor ligation Vector ligation First hybridization Second PCR amplification Second hybridization First PCR amplification
  • 85. Assessment of contigs from the cDNA libraries responding to water stress by suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) Known Unknown cDNA Valid Total Uni- functional contigs functional library ESTs contigs contigs contigs Number % SSH 1h 1697 938 146 114 792 84.43 SSH 6h 1824 566 265 203 301 53.18 SSH 12h 1833 516 166 133 350 67.83 SSH 24h 1131 786 441 202 345 43.89 SSH 48h 1148 635 414 234 221 34.80 Total 6733 3441 1432 886 2009 58.38 Wheat seedlings were treated with -0.5MPa PEG-6000 for 1, 6, 12, 24, 48h, respectively.
  • 86. Classification of genes that respond to water stress 1h, 6h, 12h, 24h and 48h G1: Alcohol dehydrogenase G2: Aldehyde dehydrogenase SSH 1h G3: Ca2+-binding proteins G4: Calmondulin binding proteins 1 / 19 G5: Carbohydrate metabolism-related proteins G6: Cellular structure and organization-related proteins G7: Cytochrome p450 1 1 G8: Detoxification enzymes G9: Fatty acid metabolism-related proteins G10: Ferritin SSH 48h SSH 6h G11: Membrane proteins 1/26 G12: Osmoprotectant synthesis-related proteins 0 / 19 G13: Plant defence-related proteins G14: Protease inhibitor 13 / 27 G15: Protection factors of macromolecules G16: Protein kinases 2 2 G17: Protein phosphatases G18: Protein synthesis-related proteins G19: Proteinases G20: Proteins involved in biosynthesis and metabolism of hormones G21: Proteins regulated by various hormones G22: Reproductive development-related proteins SSH 24h 1 SSH 12h G23: Respiration-related proteins 0/17 1/24 G24: RNA-binding proteins G25: Secondary metabolism-related proteins G26: Senescence-related proteins G27: Transcription factors Black represents the number of shared/total classification in 5 cDNA libraries; Red represents the number of classification shared by 2 bordering upon libraries; Blue represents the number of special/total classification in the library.
  • 87. Putative key classifications of differential expressed genes from 648 Uni-genes Protein Protein kinase Ca2+-binding phosphatase 4.01% protein 2.16% 0.62% Transcription Calmondulin factor binding protein 0.46% 6.17% Detoxification enzyme 3.40% Plant defence- Others related protein 65.74% 8.33% Membrane protein 9.11% Pang et al., Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2007, 33:333-336
  • 88. Case 1: TaPP2Ac (protein phosphatase 2Ac) TaPP2Ac identified from cDNA libraries at 6h and 12h, plays important roles in cellular growth and signalling, ubiquitously expressed in plants.
  • 89. PP2A structure Structural subunit A; Variable subunit B (B’, B’’, B’’’); Catalytic subunit C
  • 90. PP2Ac Function CTR 1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinase. (Kieber et al., Cell, 1993, 72: 427-441)
  • 92. Overexpression of transgenic TaPP2Ac-1 tobacco under water stress condition Before water stress Water stress 12 d WT GFP TaPP2Ac WT GFP TaPP2Ac Water stress 18 d Water stress 24 d WT GFP TaPP2Ac WT GFP TaPP2Ac
  • 93. Transgenic TaPP2Ac-1 tobacco plants enhance drought tolerance under water deficit Time of drought stress (d) Physiological trait RWC: relative water content; MSI: membrane stability index; WRA: water retention ability; WUE: water use efficiency
  • 94. DT of transgenic TaPP2Ac-1 Arabidopsis Salt tolerance WT: wild type &: transgenic line P: GFP Xu et al., Annals of Botany. 2007, 99:439-450
  • 95. Chromosome location of TaPP2Ac-1 by the wild relative species and nulli-tetrasomics lines of Chinese Spring (A) TaPP2Ac-1-1 with PCR specific primer on A genome; (B) TaPP2Ac-1-3 with PCR specific primer on D genome; (C) TaPP2Ac-1-2 with PCR specific primer on S genome; (D) TaPP2Ac-1-2 with PCR-RFLP (TaqI) on S genome. M: DNA marker; H: Hanxuan 10; L: Lumai 14; O: Opata 85; W: W7984; AB: Triticun durum DS107(AABB); A: T. urartu UR203(AA); B: Ae.speltoides 2046(SS); D: T.tauschii Y2009(DD); CS: Chinese Spring; N4AT4B, N4AT4D, N4BT4D and N4DT4B: nulli-tetrasomics lines of CS.
  • 96. 4D M: DNA marker O: Opata85 W: W7984 Schematic illustration of PCR-RFLP product of specific-sequence of D genome between two parents of RIL population EcoR V Hind III Noc I ABD ABD ABD AB AB AB D D D A A A S S S Three copies of TaPP2Ac was identified in hexaploid wheat by Southern Blotting Map of TaPP2Ac-1 on chromosome 4DL
  • 97. Case 2: TaABC1L mapping in RILs Genetic mapping of TaABC1L gene based on CAPS marker and AS-PCR marker Wang et al., JXB, 2011, 62:1299-1311
  • 98. Case 3: TaSnRK2.7 Cloning, location and functional analysis of a gene involved in abiotic-stressed responses Minimal ABA signaling pathway Structure prediction a. In the absence of ABA, the phosphatase PP2C is free to 10-33: Protein kinases ATP-binding inhibit autophosphorylation of a family of SnRK2 kinases. region signature b. ABA enables the PYR/PYL/RCAR family of proteins to bind to 119-131: Serine/Threonine protein kinases and sequester PP2C. This relieves inhibition on SnRK2, which active-site signature becomes auto-activated and can subsequently phosphorylate and activate downstream transcription factors (ABFs) to initiate transcription at ABA-responsive promoter elements (ABREs). (Sheard and Zheng, 2009. Nature 462, 575-576)
  • 99. Southern blotting One copy of TaSnRK2.7 might exist in each of the three genomes of common wheat. Chromosome location Phylogenetic tree of TaSnRK2.7 and of TaSnRK2.7-A copy SnRK2s from other plant species Phosphorus utilization efficiency TaSnRK2.7 was clustered in subclass I, Accumulation efficiency of stem bootstrap values are in percentages. water-soluble carbohydrates Zhang et al., Gene, 2011, 478:28-34
  • 100. TaSnRK2.7 was expressed strongly in seedling roots, weakly in booting spindles, and marginally in seedling leaves and heading spikes. The expression levels of TaSnRK2.7 increased significantly under salt, PEG and cold stress conditions, but might be not activated by ABA. Expression patterns of TaSnRK2.7 in various tissues (A) and in response to various treatments (B)
  • 101. Subcellular localization TaSnRK2.7-GFP was present in the cell membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus Stress tolerance assays of TaSnRK2.7 over-expressing transgenic Arabidopsis Zhang et al., JXB, 2011, 62:975-988
  • 102. Drought tolerant Drought sensitive Phylogenetic tree representing TaSnRK2.7 haplotype relationship among 50 wheat accessions Zhang et al., Gene, 2011, 478:28-34
  • 103. Case 4: Ta6-SFT Cloning, location and functional analysis of a gene involved in fructan synthesis 6-SFT 1-FFT levan neoseries 6G-kestotriose inulin neoseries β(2-1) β(2-1) 6G-FFT 6-SFT 6-SFT 1-SST 1-FFT levan 6-kestotriose SUCROSE 1-kestotriose inulin β(2-1) β(2-1) 6-SFT 6-SFT 1-FFT mixed-type levan bifurcose mixed-type levan β(2-1) and β(2-6) 6-SFT β(2-1) and β(2-6) FEH 1-FFT levan β(2-6) Model for fructan synthesis The fructan class of water soluble carbohydrates has been assigned a possible role in conferring tolerance to drought. 6-SFT is capable of producing 6-kestose as well as elongating 6-kestose and 1-kestose and producing both levan and branched fructan.(Vijn et al., Plant Physiology, 1999, 120, 351-359)
  • 104. Specific primer design based on the polymorphism in the sequencing of gene 6-SFT 10 20 30 40 50 6-SFT-A1 TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGCGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC 6-SFT-A2 TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGGGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC 6-SFT-D1 TACCAAACTCTCTTAGAGTTCACGAGCGGCGCTGCGATGGGGTCACACGGCAAGCCACC 550 560 570 580 590 6-SFT-A1 ACGGGATCTCTCTCT--AGGCATAATCAAAA----TTGCTTAACTCACACCAA 6-SFT-A2 ACGGGATCTCTCTCTCTAGACATAATCAAAAGGGATTGTTTAACTCACACCAA 6-SFT-D1 ACGGGATCTCTCTCT--AGACATAATCAAAA----TTGCTTAACTCGCACCAA 6-SFT-A2 specific primer 3380 3390 3400 3410 3420 3430 6-SFT-A1 TGTCACTGTGAACTACAGTATATTACTTTGTTGGGCGTAGAATCGATATAGTTTGGGTGGGTGG 6-SFT-A2 TGTCATAGTGAACT-----ATATTACTTTGTTGGGCGTAGAATCAATATAGTTTGAGTGGGTGG 6-SFT-D1 TGTCACAGTGAACTA-----TATTACTTTGTTGGGTGTAGGATCGATATAGTTTGGGTGGGTGG 6-SFT-A1 specific primer 6-SFT-D1 specific primer Three copies for 6-SFT were detected in wheat. Two copies were located on genome A, one on genome D.
  • 105. Single nucleotide mutation in 6-SFT-A1 No. Site Location Type Change Amino acid change 1 116 exon1 SNP C/T 2 333 intron1 SNP C/G 3 541 intron2 SNP G/C 4 563 intron2 SNP T/A 5 1053 intron2 SNP A/G 6 1609 exon3 SNP A/G 7 1727 exon3 SNP A/G Asn /Asp 8 1781 exon3 SNP A/G Thr/Ala 9 1783 exon3 SNP A/G 10 1831 exon3 SNP T/C 11 2140 intron3 SNP G/C 12 2157 intron3 SNP G/T 13 2311 intron3 SNP C/T 14 2358 intron3 Indel T/0 Among 30 hexaploid cultivars, 14 polymorphism sites in 6-SFT-A1 gene nucleotide sequences were identified, which included 13 SNPs and 1 InDel.
  • 106. 6-SFT-A1 mapping 1781 bp G/A 3269 bp MluⅠdigest Wu et al. M G A G G G G G G G G Y N 2010, 2011 3000 bp 2000 bp 1200 bp Segregation 6-SFT-A1 of in RILs Linkage map of 6-SFT-A1 on 4A (Yanzhan 1×Neixiang 188) (Yanzhan 1×Neixiang 188) The CAPS marker was developed based on the SNP at 1781 bp. 6-SFT-A1 was mapped on chromosome 4A. QTLs for plant height, 1000-grain weight were located in 6-SFT-A1 region (Wu et al., 2010, JXB; 2011, PLoS ONE). Yue et al., Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2011, 44:2216-2224
  • 107. Phylogenetic tree representing the haplotype relationship of 6-SFT-A1 Hapl Ⅰ Hapl Ⅱ Hapl Ⅲ Three haplotypes were identified using the 34 wheat germplasm. Haplotype I was mainly detected among wheat accessions showing mid-drought resistance and drought susceptiple. Haplotype III was found in the most of high-resistant and resistant wheat germplasm.
  • 108. The high correlation between seedling biomass under drought stress and the molecular marker was identified, which was designed based on the specific SNP/InDel in Haplotype III of 6-SFT-A1 CK T Well-watered (CK) Drought stress (T)
  • 109. Agronomic traits associated with 6-SFT-A1 in a historical population with 154 accessions Environment Trait Hap I Hap III P-Value R2(%) Rain-fed Peduncle length 7.4±1.0 8.0±1.4 0.0045 7.63 Plant height 79.2±13.2 88.1±14.3 0.0058 5.60 Well-watered Peduncle length 24.9±3.6 27.0±4.2 0.0001 11.02 Plant height 82.6±6.4 85.0±5.4 0.0337 3.93
  • 110. Single nucleotide polymorphism in 6-SFT-A2 No. Site Location Type Change Hapl I Hapl II Hapl III 1 600 Intron 2 SNP G/A G G A 2 730 Intron 2 SNP T/C T C T 3 807 Intron 2 SNP T/A C A C 4 858 Intron 2 SNP C/A C C A 5 1207 Exon 3 SNP G/A G A A 6 1237 Exon 3 SNP A/T A C T 7 1591 Exon 3 SNP C/T C C T 8 1870 Exon 3 SNP G/A G G A 9 2053 Intron 3 Indel T/0 T 0 T 10 2056 Intron 3 Indel 0/C 0 C 0 11 2546 Exon 4 SNP C/T C C T 12 2918 Exon 4 SNP G/C G G C 13 2951 Exon 4 SNP G/A G A G
  • 111. Molecular marker design for 6-SFT-A2 4A 1870bp G/A 2951bp G/A 2660b Mbo II Digest p Msg I Digest G G G A G G G G G G G A + - + - Hapl Ⅰ + + Hapl Ⅱ + - Linkage map of 6-SFT-A2 Hapl Ⅲ - + on chromosome 4A (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14)
  • 112. Phylogenetic tree representing the haplotype relationship of 6-SFT-A2 HaplⅡ HaplⅠ Hapl Ⅲ
  • 113. Thousand grain weights of DHLs with two 6-SFT-A2 haplotypes 50 ** * ** ** ** 45 ** 40 * * 35 30 TGW(g) 25 20 15 10 5 0 2001 2001 2005 2005 2006H 2006DS 2006S 2006WW 2009H 2009DS 2009S 2009WW 2010H 2010DS 2010S 2010WW Hapl I (Hanxuan 10) Hapl III (Lumai 14) Thousand grain weight (TGW) of doubled haploid lines (DHLs) with Hapl III of 6-SFT-A2 is significant higher than that of Hapl I under different water regimes in five years.
  • 114. TGW of three haplotypes of 6-SFT-A2 in a historic population Year Haplotype TGW (g) P-Value R2 (%) Ⅰ 34.8±4.8 0.0397* 4.79 2008 Ⅱ 33.0±5.6 Ⅲ 35.6±4.9 Ⅰ 38.1±5.3 0.0310* 5.12 2009 Ⅱ 37.0±5.7 Ⅲ 39.7±5.5 Hapl III of 6-SFT-A2 is associated with higher thousand grain weight in the historic population consisted of 154 accessions.
  • 115. Single nucleotide polymorphism in 6-SFT-D C A G C A G A T 475 841 2243 2850 Haplotype 475 bp 841 bp 2243 bp 2850 bp Ⅰ C A G C Ⅱ C A G T Ⅲ A G A C C C C C C T C T C T C T C T C C C C C C T C T C
  • 116. Phylogenetic tree representing the haplotype relationship of 6-SFT-D HaplⅠ HaplⅡ Hapl Ⅲ
  • 117. HaplⅠ of 6-SFT-D is a favourable haplotype for TGW in a historical population 50 45 * 40 * 35 Ⅰ TGW(g) 30 Ⅱ 25 20 15 10 5 0 2009 2010 Year Haplotype TGW (g) P-Value R2(%) 2009 Ⅰ 40.4 ± 4.6 0.0351 2.46 Ⅱ 38.3 ± 5.7 2010 Ⅰ 34.5 ± 7.4 0.0385 1.94 Ⅱ 31.7 ± 6.7
  • 118. 2008H 2008S 50 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II 2009H 2009S 50 46 44 45 42 40 40 38 35 36 34 30 32 25 30 I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II 2010H 2010S 50 50 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II I+I I+II II+I II+II III+I III+II
  • 119. TGW in genotypes with different haplotype combinations of 6-SFT-A2 and 6-SFT-D Haplotype* 2008D 2008W 2009D 2009W I+I 38.50 37.34 38.64 40.01 I+II 36.77 35.01 34.80 37.96 II+I 37.30 34.63 37.89 39.65 II+II 35.55 35.36 38.58 38.49 III+I 39.46 37.18 39.55 40.60 III+II 40.39 36.58 39.31 38.37 * Combines of three haplotypes of 6-SFT-A2 and two haplotypes of 6-SFT-D. Hapl Ⅲ of 6-SFT-A2 and HaplⅠ of 6-SFT-D are favourable hyplotypes for increasing grain weight, their combination is optimum for improving grain weight in wheat.
  • 120. Relationship between TGW and water soluble carbohydrate in stem CK Cut spike 0.3% KI (200 mL/m2) Early grain filling stage Middle grain filling stage
  • 121. Analysis of thousand grain weight (TGW) Reduction (CK – KI) Env. Treatment Range (g) Mean±SD Max (g) Min (g) Mean±SD Well-watered CK 27.50-49.76 39.42±5.06 29.40 4.62 16.14±5.53 KI 11.13-38.46 23.28±5.23 Rain-fed CK 26.63-48.13 36.95±4.60 24.87 1.23 7.82±5.82 KI 14.78-43.58 29.13±6.16 TGWKI Well-watered: ×100% = 59.32% TGWcontrol TGWKI Rain-fed: TGWcontrol × 100% = 79.13% Stem-reserved WSC significantly contributes to TGW. The contribution under the drought stress condition is higher significantly than that under well-watered condition.
  • 122. WSC QTL for stem WSC in DH population QTLs 58 additive, 34 pairs Additive QTL; contribution rate 36.80% epistatic Epistatic Total Trait (peduncle), 49.57% (secondR2(%) Number (lower section) Number section), 49.24% R2(%) (%) Peduncle 21 31.93 9 4.87 36.80 TGW QTL Second section 17 40.97 10 8.60 49.57 Lower section 20 additive, 17 pairs 20 epistatic37.73 QTL; contribution 11.51 66.36% 15 rate 49.24 QTLs for TGW in DH population 22 common intervals of WSC QTL and TGW QTL. Additive Epistatic Total (1A:Stage WMC59; 1B: WMC156, CWM65, A1133-370, WMC269.2; 1D: Number R2(%) Number R2(%) (%) WMC222; 2B: WMC441; 2D: WMC453.1, Xgwm539, A4233-175, 2 4 6.99 6 4.02 11.01 WMC41; 3A: Xgwm391; 4A: A3446-205; 5A: Xgwm156, Xgwm595; 5B: 3 4 5.13 5 3.82 8.95 4 4 13.03 1 3.08 16.11 Xgwm67, Xgwm213, Xgwm499, WMC380; 6A: CWM487; 7A: A3446- 280, A2454-280) 7 5 22.69 5 6.48 29.17
  • 123. Lower section, WSC additive QTL, stage 5 Lower section, WSC epistatic QTL, stage 3 TGW epistatic QTL, stage 4 Lower section, WSC epistatic QTL, stage 5 TGW additive QTL, stage 2, 3, 4 Second section, WSC epistatic QTL, stage 1 TGW epistatic QTL, stage 5 Lower section, WSC epistatic QTL, stage 5 QTL for WSC and TGW on chromosome 4A
  • 124. 6-SFT-A2 mapping 4A 4A 4A H10 L14 TGW TGW epistatic QTL, stage 5 Linkage map of 6-SFT-A2 on 4A Su et al., 2009 Yang et al., 2007 (Hanxuan 10×Lumai 14) Plant Science Genetics
  • 125. Summary A number of QTLs and QTL clusters for drought tolerance have been identified by linkage mapping. A few of functional markers have been developed. Some useful alleles of target genes/QTLs were tested in common wheat collections. Few markers were corresponding in diversity genetic backgrounds.
  • 126. In the Future  To integrate the QTLs and functional markers mapped in multi-population  To identify beneficial alleles in germplasm resources by association mapping of candidate genes/QTLs  To introgress DT into elite wheat backgrounds by molecular marker assisted recurrent selection
  • 127. Acknowledgements Collabrators Yuchen DONG Jizeng JIA Xueyong ZHANG Xiuying KONG Chenyang HAO Financial Support National High Tech Program National Key Program for Basic Research
  • 129. “There’s no single gene that’s going to be the panacea to our drought problem. We’re trying to cherry-pick the various mechanisms and recombine them into one elite cultivar.” --- Dr. Ryan Whitford, a scientist with the ACPFG’s Drought Focus Group, 2011
  • 130. 果聚糖的作用 Water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) in wheat stem is mainly composed of fructans, sucrose, glucose and fructose, with fructans being the major component at the late stage of the WSC accumulation phase. At the stage of maximum WSC content, fructans represented 85% of the WSC in wheat stem internodes.  Fructan’s high water solubility: osmotic adjustment.  Fructan as a source of hexose sugars: allow continued leaf expansion during periods of drought.  Direct protective effects of fructan: membrane stabilization. Bolouri-Moghaddam, et al., 2010, FEBS J., 277, 2022-2037