SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 22
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Academic Excellence
  Indicator System
       2011-12
Annual Report and Public Hearing
        Georgetown ISD
        February 26, 2013
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)
     Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute
     Published annually since 1990-91
     Gives parents and community a snapshot of
       District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)
       District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report)
       District Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language
        Performance (Section III of AEIS Report)
     Uses data collected through:
       State data reporting system (PEIMS)
       Student assessment system
No Accountability Ratings for 2011-12

                             vs.



             TAKS & New STAAR Assessments
- Gr. 10-11 students took TAKS.
- Passing standards were not set until this school year for
  STAAR Gr. 3-8, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, and STAAR
  Alternate. The only tests for which standards were set last
  year were the STAAR End-of-Course exams.
AEIS Report – 3 Sections
 Section I: District/Campus Performance
   TAKS Performance
      Disaggregated by grade level & student group
   Attendance & Annual Dropout Rate
   Completion Rate
   College Readiness Indicators
      Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion, RHSP & DAP
       Graduates, AP/IB Results, Texas Success Initiative - Higher
       Education Readiness Component (HERC), SAT/ACT Results,
       College-Ready Graduates
AEIS Report – 3 Sections
  Section II: District/Campus Profile
    Student information (enrollment, demographics, retention rates,
     class size)
    Staff information (demographics, experience, salary information)
    Budget information (tax information, revenues, expenditures)
    Program information (student enrollment, teachers by program)

  Section III: Bilingual Education/English as a Second
   Language Report (District AEIS Report only)
    TAKS performance data for current year Limited English Proficient
     (LEP) students
Percent Met 2012 TAKS Performance Standard
(Sum of Grades 10 and 11)
     100   95                                                                         98
                98                  89                       90                                    99
      90                  97                                                95             95 95        95
                     91        91                  93
                                                                  89
      80
                                              82        82                       80
                                         77                            79
      70
                                                                                                             All
      60
                                                                                                             Af. Am.
      50
                                                                                                             Hisp
      40
                                                                                                             White
      30

      20
                                                                                                             Eco. Dis.

      10

       0
                     ELA                  Math                    Science              Social Studies
Completion Rate I

   Completion Rate I (HS)
        Grades 9-12
                                            Dropped    Graduated
        4-year cohort measure                Out
        Formula:
                                                       Continued
                                            Received
        # Graduates + Continuers                         High
                                             GED
                                                        School
# Graduates + Continuers + GED + Dropouts
4-Year Completion Rate (Gr. 9-12)
Class of 2011 (longitudinal data)
                                                                               1.1

      Eco Dis                            87.8                              6.3 4.8
                                                                                     1.0

       White                                  94.8                                     1.9
                                                                                2.3
                                                                              1.4

     Hispanic                            88.3                              5.2 5.2

   Afric Amer                           85.3                            5.9   8.8
                                                                                1.3

          All                                 92.4                            3.1 3.2


                0%   10%    20%   30%   40%     50%   60%   70%   80%   90%          100%


                           Grad   Continued HS        GED   4-Yr Dropout
Additional Indicators:
College Readiness Indicators
    High school students completing an Advanced
     Course/Dual Enrollment in 2010-11:
       28.5% vs. 30.3% State
    2011 graduates completing the Recommended High
     School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program:
       83.8% vs. 80.1% State
    Advanced Placement (AP) results for 2010-11:
       Tested: 19.9% vs. 24.0% State
       Examinees >= Criterion*: 74.3% vs. 49.3% State
       % Scores >= Criterion*: 61.2% vs. 45.2% State

                                                *3 on AP Exam
Additional Indicators:
SAT/ACT Results for the Class of 2011

      Percent Tested:                     Average SAT Score:
            All Students: 72.8         GISD 1042 vs. 976 State Avg.
            African Amer: 70.8
            Hispanic: 48.8
                                           Average ACT Score:
            White: 84.0
                                        GISD 21.8 vs. 20.5 State Avg.
            Eco. Disadv: N/A

      Percent At/Above Criterion*
            All Students: 35.9
            African Amer: 5.9
            Hispanic: 18.4
            White: 41.9
            Eco. Disadv: N/A
                                          *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
Additional Indicators: Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
Percent of 11th Graders Meeting the Higher Education Readiness Component
   100
    90
                                                                                80 81
    80
                                    76 74                            75 75
                        73
    70             67          64                        66 68
    60       58
    50
    40
    30
    20
    10
     0
                  English Language Arts                          Mathematics
                        2007     2008      2009     2010      2011     2012


  TAKS ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay          TAKS Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
Additional Indicators: 2011 College-Ready Graduates
 100%

 90%


 80%                                          76%
                    70%
 70%                                67%
            64%
 60%
                                                                 59%
                                                          52%
 50%


 40%


 30%

 20%


 10%

  0%

        English Language Arts        Mathematics          Both Subjects

              Class of 2011: State of Texas         Class of 2011: GISD
AEIS Report
Section II - Profile
   Student Information                    Staff Information
      Enrollment data by grade level         Type of staff
      Ethnic distribution                    Educational & experience level
      Other demographic statistics           Salary data
      Graduate information                   Turnover rate for teachers
      Retention rates
      Average class size information      Financial Information
                                              Tax information
                                              Revenues
                                              Expenditures

                                           Program Information
                                              Student enrollment
                                              Teachers by program
District Demographics: Student Enrollment
12000
                                                                            10470 10397
                                                         9902   10168 10443
10000                                      9082
                                                  9508
                             8645   8814
               8345   8511
        8022
8000

6000

4000

2000

   0
12000
                           GISD Longitudinal Data: Economically Disadvantaged Students


                   10000



                    8000
Total Enrollment




                                                                                                           5673    5389
                                                                                                   5975
                                                                                           6164
                                                                                    6158
                                                                            6052
                    6000                                    5807    5921                                           48.2%
                                            5801    5799
                                    6069                                                                   45.8%
                            5925                                                                   42.8%
                                                                                    37.8% 39.4%
                    4000                                                    36.3%
                                                                    34.8%
                                                            34.1%
                                                    32.9%
                                            31.8%                                                          4797    5008
                    2000            27.3%                                                          4468
                                                                                    3744   4004
                            26.1%                           3007    3161    3456
                                            2710    2846
                            2097 2276

                       0
                           2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12


                                                    # EcoDis        # Not EcoDis       % EcoDis
Enrollment by Ethnicity
              Fall 2000                     2.1%   Fall 2011
       0.3%                          0.4%
0.6%          3.5%                   1.0%            3.4%

                                                               AfrAm
                          AfrAm
                                                               Hisp
              23.7%       Hisp
                                                   39.3%       White
                          White
72.0%                                                          Asian/PI
                                       53.8%
                          Asian/PI
                                                               AmInd

                          NatAm                                2 or More
                                                               Races
Section III: Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Report
2011-12 District Performance Report for Current LEP Students
                     TAKS Met 2012 Standard (Sum of Grades 10 & 11)
                    All Students            ESL            LEP – No        Total LEP
Indicator:          (Gr. 10-11)         (Gr. 10-11)        Services       (Gr. 10-11)
Reading/ELA             95%                52%                 *             54%

Mathematics             89%                57%                 *             58%

Science                 90%                48%                 *             50%

Social Studies          98%                70%                 *             71%

All Tests               83%                19%                 *             22%

*results masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality
Campus Performance Objectives

   Campus Improvement Plans are based on campus needs.

   Performance Objectives are approved by the Board of
    Trustees.

   Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of
    performance objectives.
Violent and Criminal Incidents
  Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual
   report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district

  The report must include:
      Number, rate, and type of incidents
      Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention
       policies and procedures used by the district
      Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and
       Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Violent and Criminal Incidents for 2011-12
             Type                 #     Rate                     Type                    #     Rate
  Controlled Substances           16   0.15%       Alcohol Offenses                      3    0.03%
  (including felony violations)

  Criminal Mischief               0      0%        Weapons Violation                     12   0.12%
  Arson                           0      0%        Assault (on employee/volunteer)       1    0.01%
  Retaliation                     0      0%        Assault (not on employee/volunteer)   3    0.03%
  Cigarette/Tobacco               6    0.06%       Fighting/Mutual Combat                12   0.12%
  Terroristic Threat &            0      0%        Public Lewdness & Indecent            1    0.01%
  False Report                                     Exposure
  Conduct Punishable as           1    0.01%       Other*                                0      0%
  a Felony
 *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency
 with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault,
 manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder

 Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2011-12 Summer;
 GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2011-12 PEIMS Resubmission: 10,397
Student Enrollment and Academic Performance
      (Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board – Required Report)
     Data collected and reported by the THECB in an annual report:
         Report of 2009-2010 High School Graduates’ Enrollment and Academic Performance in
                            Texas Public Higher Education in Fiscal Year 2011
     Reports on student performance in postsecondary institutions during the first year enrolled
      after graduation from high school

                                                                   GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas
                                                 Total
    District: Georgetown ISD                   Graduates   < 2.0       2.0 – 2.49   2.5 – 2.99   3.0 – 3.49   > 3.5   Unknown
    Four-Year Public University: GHS             164       25             27           33           29        48          2
    Four-Year Public University: RHS              4         *              *            *            *         *          *
    Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS                183       47             23           37           31        27          18
    Two-Year Public Colleges: RHS                 13        2              2            1            1         1          6
    Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS      61
    Not Trackable: GHS                            14
    Not Found: GHS & RHS                         259
    Total High School Graduates in GISD          698

    GHS: Georgetown High School                                      *If enrollment in public higher education is less than 5,
    RHS: Richarte High School                                        the GPA data is omitted.
Accessing the AEIS Report
 Where the report is available:
    TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2012/index.html

    GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Page/1329

    Campus libraries or offices via computer

    Central administration building via computer or hard copy


   Contact Information
   Becky McCoy, GISD
   Assessment Director
 (512) 943-5000, ext. 6034
mccoyr@georgetownisd.org

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation

Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentationmarlaphillips3
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILDStephen Fujii
 
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling SystemTwo-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling SystemRix Morales
 
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-12012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1vcsweb
 
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxPNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxMa. Loiel Salome Nabelon
 
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009dvodicka
 
Das presentation 2011
Das presentation 2011Das presentation 2011
Das presentation 2011harrindl
 
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011Fairfax County
 
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.Hornsby-Dunlap
 
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dadsGemey McNabb
 
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dadsGemey McNabb
 
State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015txprincipalorg
 
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012Pine Tree ISD
 
Data Teams: Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...
Data Teams:  Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...Data Teams:  Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...
Data Teams: Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...ohedconnectforsuccess
 
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxPNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxMa. Loiel Salome Nabelon
 

Similar a AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation (20)

Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentation
 
Q2-2021-DASHBOARDS final.pptx
Q2-2021-DASHBOARDS final.pptxQ2-2021-DASHBOARDS final.pptx
Q2-2021-DASHBOARDS final.pptx
 
Criterion3
Criterion3Criterion3
Criterion3
 
AEIS Report Presentation
AEIS Report PresentationAEIS Report Presentation
AEIS Report Presentation
 
Resultados BAC2012
Resultados BAC2012Resultados BAC2012
Resultados BAC2012
 
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD002709_2009-2010_BUILD
002709_2009-2010_BUILD
 
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling SystemTwo-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
 
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-12012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1
2012 2013 vc-sschool-wideimprovementplan-1
 
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxPNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q1-SY-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
 
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
Carlsbad Unified Annual Rept 2009
 
Das presentation 2011
Das presentation 2011Das presentation 2011
Das presentation 2011
 
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011
Fairfax County Public Schools: Board of Superverisors Update Nov. 29, 2011
 
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.
2011 Report Card for Hornsy Elem.
 
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9- 27-12 MAP for moms and dads
 
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads
9 -27-12 MAP for moms and dads
 
State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015State accountability system 2015
State accountability system 2015
 
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic StudentsThe Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
 
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
 
Data Teams: Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...
Data Teams:  Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...Data Teams:  Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...
Data Teams: Balanced Assessment, Collaboration, Common Instruction, and Comm...
 
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptxPNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
PNHS Q3-2022-DASHBOARDS finAAAL -table only.pptx
 

Más de Georgetown Independent School District

Más de Georgetown Independent School District (20)

Financial Presentation July 2014
Financial Presentation July 2014Financial Presentation July 2014
Financial Presentation July 2014
 
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
Georgetown ISD Financial Presentation June 2014
 
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
Georgetown ISD Elementary School #11
 
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
2013-2014 Budget Update Presentation
 
Huckabee Presentat
Huckabee PresentatHuckabee Presentat
Huckabee Presentat
 
Schools First Financial Reports
Schools First Financial ReportsSchools First Financial Reports
Schools First Financial Reports
 
Tax Ratification Election Presentation
Tax Ratification Election PresentationTax Ratification Election Presentation
Tax Ratification Election Presentation
 
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
GISD Budget and Finance Overview 2012
 
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
2012-2013 Elementary Scheduling
 
SHW Construction Update - April 2012
SHW Construction Update - April 2012SHW Construction Update - April 2012
SHW Construction Update - April 2012
 
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
Huckabee Construction Update April 2012
 
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
03-26-12 McCoy Project Update
 
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
03-26-12 Huckabee Project Update
 
STAAR High School Presentation
STAAR High School PresentationSTAAR High School Presentation
STAAR High School Presentation
 
STAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
STAAR Grade 3-8 PresentationSTAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
STAAR Grade 3-8 Presentation
 
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 PresentationAYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
 
SHW Update 02-06-2012
SHW Update 02-06-2012SHW Update 02-06-2012
SHW Update 02-06-2012
 
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
Huckabee Update 02-06-2012
 
SHW Update 01-10-2012
SHW Update 01-10-2012SHW Update 01-10-2012
SHW Update 01-10-2012
 
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
Huckabee Update 01-10-2012
 

Último

Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...Sapna Thakur
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room servicediscovermytutordmt
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...anjaliyadav012327
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajanpragatimahajan3
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 

Último (20)

Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 

AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation

  • 1. Academic Excellence Indicator System 2011-12 Annual Report and Public Hearing Georgetown ISD February 26, 2013
  • 2. Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)  Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute  Published annually since 1990-91  Gives parents and community a snapshot of  District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)  District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report)  District Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Performance (Section III of AEIS Report)  Uses data collected through:  State data reporting system (PEIMS)  Student assessment system
  • 3. No Accountability Ratings for 2011-12 vs. TAKS & New STAAR Assessments - Gr. 10-11 students took TAKS. - Passing standards were not set until this school year for STAAR Gr. 3-8, STAAR L, STAAR Modified, and STAAR Alternate. The only tests for which standards were set last year were the STAAR End-of-Course exams.
  • 4. AEIS Report – 3 Sections  Section I: District/Campus Performance  TAKS Performance  Disaggregated by grade level & student group  Attendance & Annual Dropout Rate  Completion Rate  College Readiness Indicators  Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion, RHSP & DAP Graduates, AP/IB Results, Texas Success Initiative - Higher Education Readiness Component (HERC), SAT/ACT Results, College-Ready Graduates
  • 5. AEIS Report – 3 Sections  Section II: District/Campus Profile  Student information (enrollment, demographics, retention rates, class size)  Staff information (demographics, experience, salary information)  Budget information (tax information, revenues, expenditures)  Program information (student enrollment, teachers by program)  Section III: Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Report (District AEIS Report only)  TAKS performance data for current year Limited English Proficient (LEP) students
  • 6. Percent Met 2012 TAKS Performance Standard (Sum of Grades 10 and 11) 100 95 98 98 89 90 99 90 97 95 95 95 95 91 91 93 89 80 82 82 80 77 79 70 All 60 Af. Am. 50 Hisp 40 White 30 20 Eco. Dis. 10 0 ELA Math Science Social Studies
  • 7. Completion Rate I Completion Rate I (HS)  Grades 9-12 Dropped Graduated  4-year cohort measure Out  Formula: Continued Received # Graduates + Continuers High GED School # Graduates + Continuers + GED + Dropouts
  • 8. 4-Year Completion Rate (Gr. 9-12) Class of 2011 (longitudinal data) 1.1 Eco Dis 87.8 6.3 4.8 1.0 White 94.8 1.9 2.3 1.4 Hispanic 88.3 5.2 5.2 Afric Amer 85.3 5.9 8.8 1.3 All 92.4 3.1 3.2 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Grad Continued HS GED 4-Yr Dropout
  • 9. Additional Indicators: College Readiness Indicators  High school students completing an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment in 2010-11:  28.5% vs. 30.3% State  2011 graduates completing the Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program:  83.8% vs. 80.1% State  Advanced Placement (AP) results for 2010-11:  Tested: 19.9% vs. 24.0% State  Examinees >= Criterion*: 74.3% vs. 49.3% State  % Scores >= Criterion*: 61.2% vs. 45.2% State *3 on AP Exam
  • 10. Additional Indicators: SAT/ACT Results for the Class of 2011  Percent Tested:  Average SAT Score:  All Students: 72.8 GISD 1042 vs. 976 State Avg.  African Amer: 70.8  Hispanic: 48.8  Average ACT Score:  White: 84.0 GISD 21.8 vs. 20.5 State Avg.  Eco. Disadv: N/A  Percent At/Above Criterion*  All Students: 35.9  African Amer: 5.9  Hispanic: 18.4  White: 41.9  Eco. Disadv: N/A *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
  • 11. Additional Indicators: Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Percent of 11th Graders Meeting the Higher Education Readiness Component 100 90 80 81 80 76 74 75 75 73 70 67 64 66 68 60 58 50 40 30 20 10 0 English Language Arts Mathematics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TAKS ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay TAKS Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
  • 12. Additional Indicators: 2011 College-Ready Graduates 100% 90% 80% 76% 70% 70% 67% 64% 60% 59% 52% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% English Language Arts Mathematics Both Subjects Class of 2011: State of Texas Class of 2011: GISD
  • 13. AEIS Report Section II - Profile  Student Information  Staff Information  Enrollment data by grade level  Type of staff  Ethnic distribution  Educational & experience level  Other demographic statistics  Salary data  Graduate information  Turnover rate for teachers  Retention rates  Average class size information  Financial Information  Tax information  Revenues  Expenditures  Program Information  Student enrollment  Teachers by program
  • 14. District Demographics: Student Enrollment 12000 10470 10397 9902 10168 10443 10000 9082 9508 8645 8814 8345 8511 8022 8000 6000 4000 2000 0
  • 15. 12000 GISD Longitudinal Data: Economically Disadvantaged Students 10000 8000 Total Enrollment 5673 5389 5975 6164 6158 6052 6000 5807 5921 48.2% 5801 5799 6069 45.8% 5925 42.8% 37.8% 39.4% 4000 36.3% 34.8% 34.1% 32.9% 31.8% 4797 5008 2000 27.3% 4468 3744 4004 26.1% 3007 3161 3456 2710 2846 2097 2276 0 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 # EcoDis # Not EcoDis % EcoDis
  • 16. Enrollment by Ethnicity Fall 2000 2.1% Fall 2011 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 3.5% 1.0% 3.4% AfrAm AfrAm Hisp 23.7% Hisp 39.3% White White 72.0% Asian/PI 53.8% Asian/PI AmInd NatAm 2 or More Races
  • 17. Section III: Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language Report 2011-12 District Performance Report for Current LEP Students TAKS Met 2012 Standard (Sum of Grades 10 & 11) All Students ESL LEP – No Total LEP Indicator: (Gr. 10-11) (Gr. 10-11) Services (Gr. 10-11) Reading/ELA 95% 52% * 54% Mathematics 89% 57% * 58% Science 90% 48% * 50% Social Studies 98% 70% * 71% All Tests 83% 19% * 22% *results masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality
  • 18. Campus Performance Objectives  Campus Improvement Plans are based on campus needs.  Performance Objectives are approved by the Board of Trustees.  Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of performance objectives.
  • 19. Violent and Criminal Incidents  Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district  The report must include:  Number, rate, and type of incidents  Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention policies and procedures used by the district  Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
  • 20. Violent and Criminal Incidents for 2011-12 Type # Rate Type # Rate Controlled Substances 16 0.15% Alcohol Offenses 3 0.03% (including felony violations) Criminal Mischief 0 0% Weapons Violation 12 0.12% Arson 0 0% Assault (on employee/volunteer) 1 0.01% Retaliation 0 0% Assault (not on employee/volunteer) 3 0.03% Cigarette/Tobacco 6 0.06% Fighting/Mutual Combat 12 0.12% Terroristic Threat & 0 0% Public Lewdness & Indecent 1 0.01% False Report Exposure Conduct Punishable as 1 0.01% Other* 0 0% a Felony *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault, manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2011-12 Summer; GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2011-12 PEIMS Resubmission: 10,397
  • 21. Student Enrollment and Academic Performance (Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board – Required Report)  Data collected and reported by the THECB in an annual report: Report of 2009-2010 High School Graduates’ Enrollment and Academic Performance in Texas Public Higher Education in Fiscal Year 2011  Reports on student performance in postsecondary institutions during the first year enrolled after graduation from high school GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas Total District: Georgetown ISD Graduates < 2.0 2.0 – 2.49 2.5 – 2.99 3.0 – 3.49 > 3.5 Unknown Four-Year Public University: GHS 164 25 27 33 29 48 2 Four-Year Public University: RHS 4 * * * * * * Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS 183 47 23 37 31 27 18 Two-Year Public Colleges: RHS 13 2 2 1 1 1 6 Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS 61 Not Trackable: GHS 14 Not Found: GHS & RHS 259 Total High School Graduates in GISD 698 GHS: Georgetown High School *If enrollment in public higher education is less than 5, RHS: Richarte High School the GPA data is omitted.
  • 22. Accessing the AEIS Report  Where the report is available:  TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2012/index.html  GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Page/1329  Campus libraries or offices via computer  Central administration building via computer or hard copy Contact Information Becky McCoy, GISD Assessment Director (512) 943-5000, ext. 6034 mccoyr@georgetownisd.org