12. Are you
interested in:
Scientific
Studies
Clinical
results
Screenings
Small
every day
practice
clinic
Validated Data
Low Analysis Cost
Reduced Analysis Time
High Quality Data
Perfect Composed Study
Validated Data
Reduced data entry time
Easy access
Safety, efficacy and
predictability results help to
grow happy client list and
create new
Electronic Patient Folder
Low cost Database
Easy Use as in every
Microsoft software
13.
14. 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Alpins N. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and
intraocular astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):705-7.
Naeser K, Hjortdal J. Polar value analysis of refractive data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001
Jan;27(1):86-94.
Holladay JT, Moran JR, Kezirian GM. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive
change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001
Jan;27(1):61-79.
Alpins N. Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001
Jan;27(1):31-49.
Kaye SB, Harris WF. Analyzing refractive data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):210916. Naeser K, Hjortdal J. Multivariate analysis of refractive data: mathematics and statistics
of spherocylinders. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):129-42.
Harris WF. Analysis of astigmatism in anterior segment surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001
Jan;27(1):107-28.
Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the
description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Jun;74(6):367-75.
Review.
Graphic reporting of outcomes of refractive surgery. Reinstein DZ, Waring GO 3rd. J Refract
Surg. 2009 Nov;25(11):975-8.