More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
CPA Presentation - May 18 2013
1. 05/22/13RISKPRO1
TACPA May 18, 2013
Professional Liability for CPAs
This presentation can be found online at:
http://www.slideshare.net/GeraldBrunker/cpa-presentation-may-18-2013
2. 05/22/13RISKPRO2
Learning Objectives
Underwriters’ View of CPA Firms
Factors to Assess Premiums
Most Frequent Claims Filed
Actions to Mitigate Risk of a Claim
Cyber Risk and EPL Exposures
PL Claims Made Coverage Basics
Supplemental Payment Features
Special Endorsement Coverage Options
3. 05/22/13RISKPRO3
Current CPA PL Market
CNA/Aon/AICPA
Philadelphia
Insurance Cos
Lexington/NH (AIG)
(Chartis)
Argonaut Ins Co
CPA Mutual
Insurance Co
St. Paul/Travelers
Greenwich/XL
National Casualty
Co/Jamison
Navigators/Landy
Admiral Ins Co
Hartford Ins
Company/Target
Markel Ins Co
GenStar/Pearl
Lloyds of London
CAMICO Mutual
Ins Co
Arch Insurance
Group
Catlin Insurance
4. 05/22/13RISKPRO4
Professional Liability Insurance
What is it?
E&O insurance provides insurance coverage
for the negligent acts, errors and omissions
of the insured in performing a service
Who is a professional?
• Engineers, architects, accountants, lawyers,
doctors, not just professionals, however –
miscellaneous pros and Not For Profits
• E&O policies tend to be tailored to the
specific profession of the insured
5. 05/22/13RISKPRO5
Duty to Client
Standard of care: level of care that is
the customary or usual practice of
other members of the accounting
profession
Example: failing to file a client’s tax
return on time
CPA professional standards: public
interest, due care and objectivity
Duty to non-clients?
6. 05/22/13RISKPRO6
Negligence
Four key elements to a suit:
CPA had a duty to the client
Prove CPA breached that duty
Plaintiff must show was injured
Prove breach of duty was proximate
cause of the injury (was breach
sufficiently responsible so that CPA
should be held accountable?)
7. 05/22/13RISKPRO7
Underwriters’ Views on PH
Like PHs to collaborate and be a team
with underwriters
Provide best and most accurate
information to underwriters on area of
practice and expertise
Allows underwriters to provide best
pricing and areas for improvement
(engagement letters, peer reviews and
areas for specific CPE)
Applications and supplements (add
narrative on internal controls)
Loyalty credits
8. 05/22/13RISKPRO8
Factors to Assess Premiums
Underwriters view several variables to
determine premiums:
Revenues
Areas of practice
Types of clients
Staff
Risk/quality control procedures
Claims experience
9. 05/22/13RISKPRO9
Revenues by AOP & Client Type
Most recently completed year
Current year to date
Projection for next fiscal year
Underwriters looking for whether firm has
stable, growing or shrinking revenues
Underwriters also look at revenues per staff
member as a gauge
May average years to smooth out any
spikes or dips in revenues
10. 05/22/13RISKPRO10
Areas of Practice (AOP)
Some AOPs have higher exposure
Audit claims have higher damage payouts
Tax claims are more frequent but with
smaller damage payouts
Other high exposure AOPs: handling client
funds, trustee work and consulting work,
high profile clients
Expansion of management advisory
services (beyond IT to HR, litigation, etc)
11. 05/22/13RISKPRO11
Types of Clients
Some client types are high risk such
as public company clients; athletes or
celebrities
Some industries are higher risk with
stringent accounting guidelines and
procedures to be followed: banking,
insurance, construction and auto
dealers
12. 05/22/13RISKPRO12
CPA Firm Staff
Size of staff
Expertise of staff
Revenue per staff member
Continuing education
Turnover of staff
Length of tenure of staff
Participation in Society or Association
events
13. 05/22/13RISKPRO13
Risk Control Procedures
Use of engagement letters on all services.
Updated annually?
Use of written checklists
Diary system in place to track work
Participation in peer review program
Use of client screening process (unsavory,
financial problems, poor internal controls,
lack internal stability, uncertain futures,
change, sue or shop for CPAs, substantial
litigation, expertise mismatch, professional
intuition)
No suits to recover fees
15. 05/22/13RISKPRO15
Percentage of Total Claims
(By Service)
55%
13%
11%
10%
5%
6%
Tax Claims 55%
Compilation &
Review 13%
Consulting 11%
Audit 10%
Fiduciary 5%
Other 6%
Copyright 2010
Ralph G. Picardi, Esq.
www.lappingpicardi.com
16. 05/22/13RISKPRO16
Percentage of Total Dollar Losses
(By Service)
17%
13%
8%
37%
5%20%
Tax Claims 17%
Compilation &
Review 13%
Consulting 8%
Audit 37%
Fiduciary 5%
Other 20%
Copyright 2010
Ralph G. Picardi, Esq.
www.lappingpicardi.com
17. 05/22/13RISKPRO17
Percentage of Tax Claims
(By Type of Client)
35%
20%
16%
13%
8%
8% Individual
35%
C Corp 20%
S Corp 16%
Partnership
13%
Trust 8%
Estate 8%
Copyright 2010
Ralph G. Picardi, Esq.
www.lappingpicardi.com
18. 05/22/13RISKPRO18
Percentage of Audit Claims
(By Source of Claim)
40%
5%
10%
9%
6%
25%
5%
Failure to detect 40%
Conflict of Interest
5%
Insufficient
Disclosures 10%
Engagement Disputes
9%
Fraud 6%
Financial Statement
Errors 25%
Other 5%
Copyright 2010
Ralph G. Picardi, Esq.
www.lappingpicardi.com
19. 05/22/13RISKPRO19
Claim Trends Since 2008
Most frequent claims are tax related
and will continue as tax laws change
Uptick in embezzlement claims with
state of economy – CPA staff stealing
from firm’s clients
Firm does tax work with no
engagement letter – dragged in as a
“deep pocket”
20. 05/22/13RISKPRO20
Claim Examples
$170,000 -An accountant made a $1.9
million error in a client’s financial
statements. Client filed claim for cost of
another accounting firm to correct the
mistake.
$205,000 -The heirs of a wealthy investor
brought suit against their accountant for not
filing a timely tax return resulting in
penalties and interest charged to the estate.
21. 05/22/13RISKPRO21
Claim Examples
$185,000 -An accountant audited the
financial statements of a client. Failed to
detect and recognize irregularities
associated with an employee
embezzlement.
$375,000 -An accountant set up a client’s
investment properties as a corporation
instead of a partnership. Client alleged
losses for tax liability that must be paid by
the client.
22. 05/22/13RISKPRO22
Major Settlements
2007 PWC $225 million to settle
investor class action suit at Tyco
2005 KPMG $22 million SEC
settlement over Xerox audits
2005 D&T $50 million to settle US
regulators claims over Adelphia
1999 E&Y $335 million to Cendant
shareholder settlement
23. 05/22/13RISKPRO23
Actions to Mitigate Claims
Documentation
Client Management
Areas of Practice
Fiduciary Liability
Technology
Form of practice (PCs, LLCs, LLPs)
Personal asset protection
24. 05/22/13RISKPRO24
Documentation
Document, document, document
Engagement letters – ALL services –
specify work doing and NOT doing
Avoid “drift” – additional services w/o
Include ADR/mediation clause
Include limitation of liability clause
Use checklists and diary system
Establish record retention policy
Keep current on time and billing
Quality control document for tax work
25. 05/22/13RISKPRO25
Client Management
NEVER SUE FOR FEES
Know reasonable fees (trusts, elderly
or unsophisticated)
Do not create conflicts of interests (no
investing, loans or borrowing –
maintain independence)
Screen new clients. Background
checks. Use risk management
committee. Call PL hotline.
26. 05/22/13RISKPRO26
Client Management
Know clients, screen clients and disengage
from difficult clients (get help from
underwriters if necessary)
Know your expertise and time constraints –
do not take more than you can handle
Manage client expectations at outset and
during engagement
Do not make unattainable promises
Do not predict or guarantee outcomes
Communicate progress regularly
27. 05/22/13RISKPRO27
Area of Practice
Make sure you have expertise
Do not move out of comfort zone
Be aware of outside experts such as
tax lawyers with new schemes
Be cautious of new areas of practice –
SEC attest work for financial firms.
Investment funds, mortgage bankers
or brokers or real estate related
clients
28. 05/22/13RISKPRO28
Fiduciary Liability
Trustee work problematic when family
dysfunctional. Trust agreement with
indemnification of trustee for liability
claims funded with trustee liability
insurance
Access to client funds – careful
supervision of your employees.
Dishonesty bond with third party
extension for client funds
29. 05/22/13RISKPRO29
Technology
2010 – Chinese Hackers Target Law Firms
to Get Secret Deal Data – (Potash-BHP
Billiton Ltd) – if law firms vulnerable – CPA
firms?
Strong data protection procedures
Reinforce with encryption and firewall
Client electronic records on site only
Consider an outside technology audit
Consider cyber liability insurance (rather
than endorsements on PL or BOP)
30. 05/22/13RISKPRO30
Cyber Risk and EPL
The frequency of online attacks against
U.S. businesses continues to increase,
along with the cost of defending against
those attacks and mitigating any resulting
data breaches
According to the 2012-2013 Edition of Jury
Award Trends and Statistics, the national
median award for employment practice
claims in 2011 was $325,000, up from
$172,500 in 2010
Separate limits from PL and specialized
services for cyber and EPL risks
31. 05/22/13RISKPRO31
PL Claims Made Coverage Basics
Claim made during policy period.
Claim or circumstance reported during
policy period (or if ERP activated).
Negligent act happened after prior acts or
retroactive date.
Good faith statement no knowledge of
negligent act on inception date of policy.
32. 05/22/13RISKPRO32
Accounting Professional
Liability Insurance
Covers claims from rendering or
failing to render professional
accounting services.
Claims made trigger.
Prior acts coverage.
Defense and payments to third
parties.
Endorsements and exclusions.
Limits/deductibles and cost.
Contractual liability (vicarious liability
of consultants).
Extended Reporting Periods (Tail).
Hammer clauses
33. 05/22/13RISKPRO33
Basic or Broad Coverage
Simple application
Basic coverage for accountants,
bookkeepers and tax preparers
Tax engagements, planning
Bookkeeping
Reviews
Compilations
Independent contractors
Notary public
34. 05/22/13RISKPRO34
Broad Coverage
More detailed application
Higher limits and deductible options
Coverage for reviews and audits
SEC acts/security related activities
Computer hardware/software sales
Investment advice, management
advisory and financial advising
More ERP options (1,3,5 years)
Free Death or Disability ERPs
35. 05/22/13RISKPRO35
Supplemental Payment Features
Defense Costs Outside Limits
Loss of Earnings (per day/aggregate)
Regulatory or Governmental Actions,
Disciplinary Proceedings (aggregate per
policy year)
Subpoena Response Assistance (legal
representation)
Pre-Claims Assistance (reporting of events;
legal representation; subsequent claims
covered)
Mediation Deductible Credits
36. 05/22/13RISKPRO36
Special Endorsement Coverage
Options
Electronic media exposure including social
media
Cyber liability and identity theft
Sarbanes Oxley
Gramm Leach Bliley
Life insurance sales
Services as a registered rep
Employment practices liability (defense
only)
Non-Profit D&O (low limits)
37. 05/22/13RISKPRO37
Summary
Questions?
Underwriters’ views on CPA firms, factors to
assess premiums, claims and actions to
mitigate risk of a claim
Improve your CPA Practice and Services to
Your Clients
Coverage Checklists on Professional, EPL
and Cyber Risk
38. 05/22/13RISKPRO38
RISKPRO Insurance Agency, LLC
Gerald P Brunker, CPCU, ARM
Principal/Owner
Facebook: Gerald Brunker & RISKPRO
Insurance Agency, LLC
Twitter: RISKPROInsAgy
LinkedIn: Gerald Brunker
Blog: www.riskpro.us/blog
Email: brunker@riskpro.us
This presentation can be found online at:
http://www.slideshare.net/GeraldBrunker/cpa-presentation-may-18-2013
Notas del editor
Engagement letters is one of the first items requested if a firm is involved in a claim. The letter needs to indicate what services the firm is and is not providing and should be updated annually to reflect engagement changes. If there is no engagement letter, a lawsuit becomes a case of he said/she said. In certain cases clients do not return signed engagement letter, particularly tax clients. In these situations consider adding wording to your invoices that would reflect acceptance of engagement terms, such as “Upon payment of this invoice, client agrees that services were provided as stated in the attached engagement letter.” This at least documents the services that were provided