‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS WIDAA-E-JUNG’

1Translation studies project
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY
M.A ENGLISH LITERATURE & LANGUISTICS
4th SEMESTER-SECTION A
COMPARATIVE LITERATURE
Subject: TRANSLATION PROJECT
SUBMITTED TO: MADAM NIGHAT
SUBMITTED BY:
HUMA ASLAM
HUMA HAFEEZ
SUMAIRA BIBI
KINZA GHAFOOR

‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN
BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS
WIDAA-E-JUNG’
INTRODUCTION:
Translation is “the process of turning an original or "source" text into a text in another
language1
.”It is communication between humans; however, unlike most human linguistic
communication, it is tied to communication between two parties that do not understand one
another without the mediation of a middleman – a translator.
“Translation has a central core of linguistic activity, it belongs most properly tosemiotics,
the science that studies sign systems or structures, sign processes and sign functions”2
.
Beyond the notion stressed by the narrowly linguistic approach, that translation involves the
transfer of `meaning' contained in one set of language signs through competent use of the
dictionary and grammar, the process involves a whole set of extra-linguistic criteria also.
According to Nida and Taber in The Theory and Practice of Translation, “Translating consists
in reproducing in the receptor language the closest natural equivalent of the source-
language message, first in terms of meaning and secondly in terms of style”.
Our project is about translation analysis of A Farewell to Arms (English text) by Ernest
Hemingway translated as Widaa-e-Jang (Urdu text) by Ashfaq Ahmad. Although the manner
and the style of English language differs to some extent as compared to Urdu language, even if
the translator tries his best to retain authenticity. In our present project, we are going to analyze
that how the manner and the style are different in the two languages. "To translate, one must
have a style of his own, for otherwise the translation will have no rhythm or nuance, which come
from the process of artistically thinking through and moulding the sentences; they cannot be
1
JeremyMunday
2
Hawks, Structuralism and Semiotics, London, 1977

reconstituted by piecemeal imitation. The problem of translation is to retreat to a simpler tenor of
one's own style and creatively adjust this to one's author3
."
We have selected two texts for this project. One is in English language (the source text) and the
other is it‟s translation in Urdu language (target text). For the purpose of analysis, we will apply
the models, approaches and theories on respective texts, more specifically the translated text. The
following novels are selected for the analysis in this project. Novel is A Farewell to Arms
byErnest Hemingway and its translation isWidaa-e-Jang by Ashfaq Ahmad.
HYPOTHESIS:
“Ashfaq Ahmed is acknowledged as a globally-renowned playwright, intellectual and
spiritualist.”
It is assumed that the target text (translated by Ashfaq Ahmad) has succeeded in providing the
aesthetic pleasure to the readers in approximately the same manner as that of the original one.
INTRODUCTION TO THE SOURCE TEXT:
Hemingway was the most influential fiction writer of his generation who changed the way many
of his contemporaries expressed themselves. Ernest Hemingway was an American author and
journalist. His style had a strong influence on 20th-century fiction.
Hemingway produced most of his work between the mid-1920s and the mid-1950s, and won the
Nobel Prize in Literature in 1954. After high school he reported for a few months for The Kansas
City Star, before leaving for the Italian front to enlist with the World War I ambulance drivers. In
1918, he was seriously wounded and returned home. His wartime experiences formed the basis
for his novel A Farewell to Arms. He published seven novels, six short story collections and two
non-fiction works. Many of these are considered classics of American literature.
When it was published in 1929, A Farewell to Arms was considered to be the bestseller. It was
built on the theme of universal loneliness in the midst of war, and it left the impression of
overwhelming emotion severely controlled, conveyed with the fewest possible words. That was
the typical of the best of Hemingway„s writing.
3
Paul Goodman, Five Years: Thoughts During a Useless Time, 1969

The love story of A Farewell to Arms is narrated against the background of war. In the course of
the novel, there are many references to the war and troops-movement. In fact, the novel is as
much a story of war as of love. A Farewell to Arms deal with the subject: the condition of man in
a society upset by the violence of war. The setting of the novel is war itself, and the romance of
Frederic Henry and Catherine Barkley, their attempt to escape the war and its resulting chaos is a
parable of the 20th century man‟s disgust and disillusionment at the failure of civilization to
achieve the ideals it had been promising throughout the 19th century.
The novel opens with World War I raging all over Europe. A young American student, studying
architecture in Italy, offers his services to the Italian army. In Gorizia, he is wounded in the knee
and is sent to recuperate in a hospital in Milan. He falls in love with an English nurse, Catherine
Barkley, then he lives with her, and she becomes pregnant. He returns to the front in Gorizia and
is caught in the Italian retreat. In order to save his life, he deserts his post and goes away to a
hospital in Milan to take Catherine and go some place where they can start a new life. They go to
Switzerland but cannot live happily, for a fresh tragedy awaits them. Their eagerly awaited son is
stillborn and Catherine, who can never have a normal delivery, dies after a Caesarean operation.
A Farewell to Arms was the first to be made available in Urdu. Its Urdu translation is done by
well-known writer and journalist Ashfaq Ahmed, under the name of Widaa-e-Jang.
INTRODUCTION TO THE TARGET TEXT:
Ashfaq Ahmed was one of the most prolific Urdu writers in Pakistan. He was a distinguished
playwright, broadcaster, intellectual and spiritualist. He wrote the finest works in Urdu. He
started writing stories in his childhood.
He completed his Masters in Urdu literature from Government College Lahore. He worked as a
teacher at Dayal Singh College, Lahore and at Rome University. He worked in Radio Pakistan
as a script writer. He also joined Radio Rome as an Urdu newscaster. During his stay in Europe,
he learned Italian and French languages from the University of Rome and University of
Grenoble, France. He took out his own monthly literary magazine; Dastaango. Ashfaq Ahmed
started his popular radio program, Talqeen Shah which made him immensely popular. He was
appointed director of the Markazi Urdu Board. He also served as adviser in the Education
Ministry.

Ashfaq Ahmed's subtle sense of humor and deep thoughts are reflected in his writings. His
popular TV plays include Aik muhabbat sau afsanay, Uchhay burj Lahore dey, Tota kahani,
Hairat kadah and Mun chalay ka sauda. All through his life, Ashfaq Ahmad endeavored to
reform the society through his writings. He had authored over twenty five books including a
travelogue, Safar dar Safar with a typical style. In fact, he gave a new mold to diction and locale.
He used Punjabi literary words very well in Urdu and introduced a new kind of prose. Ashfaq
Ahmed, in his later period of life, was greatly inclined towards Sufism, which was visibly
reflected in most of his works.
Ashfaq Ahmed has translated Ernest Hemingway's famous book, A Farewell to Arms as Widaa-
e-Jang. In „taaruf‟ (introduction) of the translation he has written a short account of
Hemingway‟s life. He has not written a summary of the source text, but told about author‟s
intention of writing the source text. He has not provided any translator notes about his method of
translation.
LITERATURE REVIEW:
Translation has always been understood to refer to a written transfer of a message or meaning
from one language to another. For a formal definition, Dubois says “translation is the
expression in another language (or target language) of what has been expressed in another,
source language, preserving semantic and stylistic equivalences” (in Bell, 1991: 5).
The theoretical framework for Translation theories, models and analogies has to be drawn, for
the understanding of the Translation system, and to determine its validity for application in real
life translation.
The explanation of the system is the theoryof the scientist which, when passed on to the other, is
realized as a model.
A theory is an explanation of a phenomenon, the perception of the system and order of
something observed. It has no tangible manifestation. It is an idea which constitutes the internal
representation of phenomenon.

A model is, in contrast, an external manifestation, rather than an internal representation of the
explanation; a realization of the theory/pedagogy. It exists as a tangible object or form which
„stands‟ for the idea embodied in the theory/pedagogy.
Translation theory, in fact, limits its activities to the level of technique or that of method, while
what is required is a principled approach from which the rest can flow.
In order to assess that how far the translator has succeeded in making the text to meet all the
standards of textuality,different translation theories, models and approaches are applied on the
text. The applied theories, models and approaches help to check the validity of the translated
text. Moreover these are applied in order to see the levels of differences occur in writing in
different languages.
The models selected to analyze the target text in our present project are;
 Eugene Nida And The Science of Translating
 Roman Jacobson: The Nature of Linguistic Meaning and Equivalence
 Vinay and Darbelnet‟s Model
 Katharina Reiss‟s Text Typology
1.EUGENE NIDA AND THE SCIENCE OF TRANSLATING:
Nida and Taber in their book;The Theory and Practice of Translation (1969) listedsome
universalfeatures of text that should be taken into account in translation:
“…all languages do have certain important features which can be used, and which in
’effective’ communications are used, to mark the units larger than sentences”
Equivalence is a preoccupation of the American Bible translator Eugene Nida who rejects the
“free” versus “literal” debate in favor of the concept of formal and dynamic equivalence – a
concept that shifts the emphasis to the target audience. This was done in order to make reading
and understanding the Bible easier for people with no knowledge of it. Let us examine his model
of translation as shown in Figure below (1964: 146):

In this model, Nida divides the translation process into a decoding phase and an encoding phase
in between the transfer of the message (M) from the source to the target language (A to B). This
model is clear and makes sense in a number of ways.
In the history of translation, the Bible has very often been translated by a source-language
speaker into the target language (from his mother tongue (A) into his foreign language (B)); this
version would often be edited and written in „correct target language‟ by a target-language
speaker.
Eugene Nida's gave two types of equivalence: formal and dynamic. Formal equivalence
“focuses attention on the message itself, in both form and content” “Principles of
Correspondence” in (Venuti, 129). Formal equivalence centers on the form and content of the
message of the ST while dynamic equivalence, later termed functional equivalence (Venuti
p.148), “aims at complete naturalness of expression” (Munday p.42) in the TT. His 1964 Toward
a Science of Translating and his co-authorship with Taber in 1969 of Theory and Practice of
Translation aim at creating a scientific approach incorporating linguistic trends for translators to
use in their work (Munday p.38).
Dynamic equivalence is based upon “the principle of equivalent effect”. In this sort of
translation the emphasis is on the “dynamic relationship” between message and receptor, and
care is taken that “the relationship between receptor and message should be substantially the
same as that which existed between the original receptors and the message” (129). Catford terms
such translations „free' as opposed to „literal' translations; Dagut goes even further and classifies
them as „reproductions' rather than translations. Nida points out that there are a “number of
intervening grades” between these two poles of translation. Recent trends in translation,
however, seem to be inclined towards dynamic rather than formal equivalence.

The British translation theorist Peter Newmark, influenced by the work of Nida, feels that the
difference between the source language and the target language would always be a major
problem, thus making total equivalence virtually impossible (Munday p.44). He replaces the
terms “formal equivalence” and “dynamic equivalence” with “semantic translation” and
“communicative translation”, and alters the focus of the translation back to the ST with his
support for a literal approach.
2. ROMAN JAKOBSON: THE NATURE OF LINGUISTIC MEANING AND
EQUIVALENCE:
Douglas Robinson writes that for some translators “the entire purpose of translation is achieving
equivalence. The target text must match the source text as fully as possible” (p.73)
Roman Jakobson‟s study of equivalence gave new impetus to the theoretical analysis of
translation since he introduced the notion of 'equivalence in difference'. Linguistic meaning and
equivalence are the key issues for the Russian structuralist Roman Jakobson who, in his 1959
work On Linguistic Works of Translation, states that there are 3 types of translation:
Intralingual (rewording or paraphrasing, summarizing, expanding or commenting within
a language)
Interlingual (the traditional concept of translation from ST to TT or the “shifting of
meaning from one language to another” (Stockinger p.4)
Intersemiotic (the changing of a written text into a different form, such as art or
dance (Berghout lecture 27/7/05; Stockinger p.4).
For Jakobson, meaning and equivalence are linked to the interlingual form of translation, which
“involves two equivalent messages in two different codes” (1959/2000: p.114). He considers
Saussure‟s ideas of the arbitrariness of the signifier (name) for the signified (object or concept)
and how this equivalence can be transferred between different languages, for example the
concept of a fence may be completely different to someone living in the suburbs or a prison
inmate. He expands on Saussure‟s work in that he considers that concepts may be transferred by

rewording, without, however, attaining full equivalence. His theory is linked to grammatical and
lexical differences between languages, as well as to the field of semantics.
Jakobson claims that, in the case of interlingual translation, the translator makes use of synonyms
in order to get the ST message across. This means that in interlingual translations there is no full
equivalence between code units. According to his theory, 'translation involves two equivalent
messages in two different codes' (ibid:233).
Jakobson goes on to say that from a grammatical point of view languages may differ from one
another to a greater or lesser degree, but this does not mean that a translation cannot be possible,
in other words, that the translator may face the problem of not finding a translation equivalent.
He acknowledges that 'whenever there is deficiency, terminology may be qualified and amplified
by loanwords or loan-translations, neologisms or semantic shifts, and finally, by circumlocutions'
(ibid:234). Jacobson provides a number of examples by comparing English and Russian
language structures and explains that in such cases where there is no a literal equivalent for a
particular ST word or sentence, then it is up to the translator to choose the most suitable way to
render it in the TT.
There seems to be some similarity between Vinay and Darbelnet's theory of translation
procedures and Jacobson's theory of translation. Both theories stress the fact that, whenever a
linguistic approach is no longer suitable to carry out a translation, the translator can rely on other
procedures such as loan-translations, neologisms and the like. Both theories recognize the
limitations of a linguistic theory and argue that a translation can never be impossible since there
are several methods that the translator can choose. The role of the translator as the person who
decides how to carry out the translation is emphasized in both theories. Vinay and Darbelnet as
well as Jacobson conceive the translation task as something which can always be carried out
from one language to another, regardless of cultural or grammatical differences between ST and
TT.
So Jakobson's theory is essentially based on his semiotic approach to translation according to
which the translator has to recode the ST message first and then s/he has to transmit it into an
equivalent message for the TC.

3. VINAY AND DARBELNET’s MODEL:
A classical model and one which has had a very wide impact is the Vinay and Darbelnet
model.Vinay and Darbelnet in their book Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais came
in 1958 and its revised form in English in 1995, thirty seven years after the original. It compare
the differences between English and French and identify two translation techniques that
somewhat resemble the literal and free methods (Vinay and Darbelnet in Venuti p.128). Vinay
and Darbelnet identified two general translational strategies direct translation and oblique
translation and these two strategies comprise seven procedures.
Direct (literal) translation discusses three possible strategies:
1. Literal translation: it is word-for-word translation. According to Vinay and Darbelnet it
is most of common between languages of same family and culture.
2. Calque: SL expression is literally transferred to the TL, such as the English character
„Snow White‟ in French becomes „Blanche Neige‟, because the normal word
configuration in English of „white snow‟ would be transferred as „neige blanche‟
3. Borrowing:SL word is transferred directly into the TL.
When literal translation is not possible, Vinay and Darbelnet say that the strategy of oblique
(free) translation must be used. This covers further four procedures:
1. Transposition: interchange of parts of speech that do not affect the meaning, a noun
phrase for a verb phrase.
2. Modulation: This changes the semantics and point of view of the S.L. It is a procedure
that is justified, in the words of the English edition, „when, although a literal, or even
transposed, translation results in a grammatically correct utterance, it is considered
unsuitable, unidiomatic or awkward in the T.L.
3. Equivalence:Vinay and Darbelnet used this term to refer the cases where languages
describe the same situation by different stylistic or structural means. It is particularly
useful in translating idioms and proverbs.
4. Adaptation: cultural references may need to be altered to become relevant (Vinay and
Darbelnet in Venuti pp129-135).

Direct translation procedures
Borrowing
Calque
Literal Translation
Oblique translation procedures
Transposition
Modulation
Equivalence
Adaptation
Table 1Vinay & Darbelnet‟s model of translation procedures
Two other important features arise from the work of Vinay and Darbelnet. The first of these is
the idea of “servitude”, which refers to the compulsory changes from ST to TT; and “option”,
which refers to the personal choices the translator makes, such as the modulation example
above. Option is an important element in translation because it allows for possible subjective
interpretation of the text, especially literary texts (Munday pp. 59-60).
These seven main translation categories operate on three levels, i.e. the lexicon, syntactic
structure, the message.
To facilitate analysis where oblique translation is used, Vinay and Darbelnet suggest numbering
the translation units in both the S.T and T.T. The units which have the same number in each text
can then be compared to see which translation procedure has been adopted.
4.KATHARINA REISS’S TEXT TYPOLOGY:
In 1970‟s Katharina Reiss introduced the concept of text type which builds on the concept of
equivalence but views the text rather than the word or sentence as the level at which the
communication is achieved and at which the equivalence must be sought. Her functional

approach initially aims at systematizing the assessment of translations. It borrows Karl Buhler‟s
three way categorization the functions of language. There three functions of language, according
to Reiss, are linked to the corresponding language dimensions and to the text types or
communicative situations in which they are used.
The main characteristics of each text types as summarized by Reiss, are as follows;
1. The first type of text is the „Informative text’. The function of language in this text is to
represent objects and the facts. There is a plain communication of facts i.e. the
information, knowledge and opinions etc are transferred are transferred to the readers of
the translated text. The language dimension used to transmit the information is logical
and referential. The content is the main focus of this type of text, the translated text
should transmit the referential content i.e. it should aim to transmit the information, facts
and object of the source text.
2. The second type of text is the „Expressive text’. It is actually a „creative composition‟, in
which the author of the translated text expresses the sender‟s attitude. The translation
method is identifying method, in which the translator adopts the perspective of source
text author. Form of text is focused on in this type and the author uses the aesthetic
dimension of language. The sender or author of the original text is fore grounded.
3. The third type of text is the „Operative text’. The function of the language is appellative
in this type i.e. it makes appeal to the reader or receiver of the text in a certain way. The
translation should employ the „adaptive method‟, thus creating an equivalent effect
among the TT readers. This adaptive method is actually concerned with changing the
behavior of the readers of the text. The form of language is dialogic and the focus is
appellative.
4. The fourth type of text, according to Reiss, is the „Audio medial text’. Such text
include films and visuals and spoken advertisements which supplement the other three
functions with visual images, music etc.
Reiss also lists a series of intralinguistic andextra linguistic instruction criteria by which
adequacy of the target text may be assessed.
Intralingual criteria involve semantic, lexical, grammatical and stylistic features.

13
Translation studies project
Extralingual criteria involve situation, subject field, time, place, receiver, sender and „affective
implications‟. (Irony, humor, emotion etc)
For an expressive text, it is important to retain the metaphor in the translation of an expressive
text than in informative text, where translation of only semantic value alone will be sufficient.
(Munday:72-74)
According to Reiss (1976), the assessment of a translation requires that in the first place one
must determine the kind of text the original represents (in term of text type and text variety); the
translator's conception of the translation (to be inferred from his manner of translating, and
perhaps also explicitly stated in a translator's preface); and the aim of the translated text. Only
when these factors have become established is one in a position to judge a translation "fairly", in
accordance with the appropriate criteria. (Reiss 1976:97-100.)
Text concept Translation type Translation aim
Text = sum of words word-for-word translation
(interlinear)
comparative linguistic
research
Text = sum of sentences literal translation
(grammar translation)
foreign language learning
Text = basic linguistic
sign
learned translation
(deliberately marked +
commentary)
study of culture-bound
language differences
Text = verbal component
of a communication
process (text-with-a-
function)
communicative translation
a) normal case
b) special subtype
a) integral communicative
performance
b) all kinds of changes of
function
Table 2 Katharina Reiss‟s model of translation typology

14
ANALYSIS OF THE TARGET TEXT:
EUGENE NIDA AND THE SCIENCE OF TRANSLATING:
Eugene Nida rejects the “free” versus “literal” debate in favor of the concept of formal and
dynamic equivalence – a concept that shifts the emphasis to the target audience. His introduction
of the formal and dynamic equivalence was crucial in introducing a receptor-based (or reader-
based) orientation to translation theory.
Eugene A. Nida (1964) distinguishes between formal and dynamic equivalence in translation. He
says “formal equivalence” refers to a faithful reproduction of source-text form elements
whereas a “dynamic equivalence” refers to equivalence of extra linguistic communicative effect
(Nida 1964 in Nord 1997: 5). Moreover, in “A Framework for the Analysis and Evaluation of
Theories of Translation” (1976) Nida emphasizes the purpose of translation, the roles of both the
translator and the receivers or recipients of translation, and also the cultural implications of the
translation process.
Nida‟s model of equivalence is applicable to the translation of A Farewell to Arms as Widaa-e-
Jung. Examples from the text are as follows:
1. Formal equivalence is described as;it focuses attention on the message itself, in both
form and content. It is actually word to word translation of the text.
ST (Source
Text)
TT (Target Text)
The trunks
of the trees
too were
dusty
andtheleave
s fell early
that
(pg 5)

15
year.(pg 7)
The plain
was rich
with crops,
there were
many
orchards of
fruit trees
and beyond
the plain
themountai
ns were
brown and
bare.(7)
(Pg 5)
The next
year there
were many
victories.
(pg 8)
(pg 6)
The day
had been
hot.
(pg 21)
(pg 26)
The carpet
on the
stairs was
(pg 167)

16
worn.
(pg 115)
I stepped
out into the
rain and
the
carriage
started.
(pg116)
(pg 168)
The roads
were
muddy.
(pg 118)
(pg 173)
I went to
the door
and looked
out.
(pg 128)
(pg 189)
The girl
looked at
me fiercely.
(pg 141)
(pg209)
Later we
were on a
road that
lead to a
river. (pg
150)
(pg 224)

17
We were
supposed to
wear steel
helmets
even in
Gorizia.(pg
25)
(pg 32)
From the above instances, it can be seen that sentences from source text (ST) is translated word
to word in the target text (TT) i.e. Urdu.
2. Dynamic equivalence is defined as the relationship between receptor and message which
is substantially the same as that which existed between the original receptors and the
message. It is actually sense to sense translation of the text.
ST(Source
Text)
TT (Target Text)
Sculpture
had always
seemed a
dull
business.
(pg 25)
(pg 31)
It’s not my
leg. I got a
rupture.
(pg no. 29)
(pg 38)
The driver
came out of
the door

18
with papers
for the
wounded in
the car.
(page no.
29)
(pg 38)
I drove
coming back
and went
fast with the
empty
car to find
the man
from
Pittsburgh.(
30)
(pg 40)
The column
stalled
again in the
night and
did not
start. I got
down and
went back to
see Aymo
and Bonello.
Bonello had
two
sergeants of
engineers
(pg 209)

19
on the seat
of his car
with him.
They
stiffened
when I came
up. (140)
They were
ruddy and
healthy
looking
(152).
(pg 226)
They did not
talk but we
could not
have heard
them
because of
the noise
from the
river.(pg
152)
(pg226 )
It was
beginning to
be light
enough,
so I could
see the
bushes
along the
(pg 244)

20
shore-
line.(163)
While we
play
billiards,
we drank
champagne.
(181)
(pg270 )
I went to
the door
very softly,
not to
disturb
Catherine,
and
opened it.
(188)
(pg281)
From these instances, it can be seen that sentences from source text (ST) is translated sense to
sense in the target text (TT) i.e. Urdu. The meaning of the source text is closer to the meaning of
target text.
2. ROMAN JAKOBSON: THE NATURE OF LINGUISTIC MEANING AND
EQUIVALENCE:
Roman Jakobson inOn Linguistic Aspects of Translation, described three kinds of translation;
intralingual, interlingual and inter-semiotic. Jacobson examined the key issues of interlingual
translation (i.e. translation between two different written languages) notably linguistic meaning
and equivalence.
Jakobson has built his model on the relation set out by Saussure between the signifier (the
spoken and written signal) and the signified (the concept).together, the signifier and the signified

21
form the linguistic meaning; that is arbitrary. He then moves on to consider the thorny problem
of equivalence in meaning between words in different languages. Jacobson says that:„There is
ordinarily no full equivalence between code-units.‟
Jakobson‟s model of linguistic meaning and equivalence is applicable to the translation of A
Farewell to Arms as Widaa-e-Jung. For example, the English word patriot is translated in Urdu
as Razaa kaar. Though there is no full equivalence between code-units in English and Urdu but
still the meaning is conveyed. For the message to be „equivalent‟ in source text (ST) and target
text (TT), the code-units will be different since they belong to two different sign systems
(languages) which partition reality differently.
As in Jakobson‟s description, interlingual translation involves ‘substituting messages in one
language not for separate code-units but for entire messages in some other language’. Thus it is
not any inability of one language to render a message that has been written in another verbal
language. (Jakobson 1959/2004; 139)
For Jakobson, cross-linguistic differences centre on obligatory grammatical and lexical forms;
‘languages differ essentially in what they must convey and not in what they may convey’.
(Jakobson 1959/2004; 139)
The differences in interlingual translation (English-Urdu, vice versa) occur at:
1. The Level of Gender:
There are certain nouns which are feminine in English language but are masculine or
neutral in Urdu. Likewise, sometimes it is the other way around. For example,
ST (Source Text) TT (Target Text)
A bat flew
Page no. 75
Page no.111
the moon shone through
Page no. 261
Page no. 290

22
the lake widened
Page no. 261
Page no. 290
the wind blew
Page no. 276
Page no. 305
they should declare war on her (Austria)
Page no. 79 Page no. 84
From the above examples it can be observed that „moon‟ is neutral in English while it is
masculine in Urdu. Likewise, „Austria‟is feminine in English while masculine in Urdu.
2. The Level of Aspect:
The level of aspect involves the change of part of speech.
I couldn’t conscientiously open a knee
Page no. 97
Page no. 106
Don’t talk
Page no. 97
Page no. 106
As in the above-given examples, „Conscientiously‟ is adverb in English while it is noun
in the Target text i.e. Urdu.
3. The Level of Semantic Fields:
The main focus of the level of semantic fields is equivalence in meaning between the two
languages.

23
Races
Page no. 94
Page no. 134
Bandaged
Page no. 94
Page no. 134
Bowed
Page no. 115
Page no. 167
sunset
Page no. 57
Page no. 48
tanneries
Page no. 188
Page no. 208
Undressing
Page no. 38
Page no. 36
horse-drawn carts
Page no. 188
Page no. 208
British batteries
Page no. 42
Page no. 41
wedge like gap
Page no. 261
Page no. 290
steer
Page no. 261
Page no. 290
under your arm
Page no. 261
Page no. 290
Close
Page no. 260
Page no. 289
noble
Page no. 260
Page no. 289

24
marble
Page no. 260
Page no. 289
ambulance
Page no. 260
Page no. 289
As in the first example, there is one word „sunset‟ in the source text while in the Urdu language
in order to achieve equivalence in meaning, it has been translated into more than one words in
Urdu.
VINAY AND DARBELNET’S MODEL:
Vinay and Darbelnet carried out a comparative stylistic analysis of French and English. They
noted the differences and identified the translation strategies and „procedure‟ in the texts of both
the languages i.e. source text and target text. The two general strategies identified by them are:
1. Direct translation
2. Oblique translation
Boththe strategies comprising seven procedures can be found in the translation of the text A
Farewell to Arms intoWidaa-e-Jung.
Direct Translation:
Direct translation is a literal or word for word translation. It covers the following three
procedures:
1. Borrowing:
In borrowing, the word in the source language (SL) is directly transferred into target
language (TL). It is done to bridge the semantic gap between two languages. For example,

25
station
page no. 116
Page no. 168
Radiator
Page no. 140
Page no. 208
first
Page no. 108
Page no. 104
machine
Page no. 108
Page no. 104
x-ray
Page no. 108
Page no. 104
surgeon
Page no. 108
Page no. 104
Shawl
Page no. 191
Page no. 214
Gear
Page no. 191
Page no. 214
socialist
Page no. 191
Page no. 214
regiment
Page no. 191
Page no. 214
Seats
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
unit

26
mess
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
Espagette
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
Bench
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
truck
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
stock-yard
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
Cabin
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
hoyle
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
porch
Order
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
In all of the above examples words in source language are directly transferred in target text.
2. Calque:
Calque is „a special kind of borrowing‟ in which the source language expression is
transferred in a literal translation. For example,

27
Fuse cap
Page no. 80
Page no. 118
Medals
Page no. 118
Page no. 174
clearing station
page no. 135
Page no. 201
Field hospitals
Page no. 135
Page no. 201
metal to metal brakes
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
golden gate
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
wheel
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
Sergeant
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
differential
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
ambulance
Page no. 35
Page no. 45
In the above examples, Urdu substitutes of the words like ambulance, golden gate etc could be
used by the author, but he borrowed these words as it is from the source text, and transferred the
source language expression in a literal translation.
3. Literal Translation:

28
It means word for word translation. For example,
Rotten
Page no. 182
Page no. 271
Delightful language
Page no. 185
Page no. 276
Noble young man
Page no. 74
Page no.109
Good man
Page no. 189
Page no. 210
Good night
Page no. 190
Page no. 210
In cases where literal translation is not possible, the strategy of oblique translation is used.
2. Oblique Translation:
Oblique translation refers to the free translation of the source text into the target text. The
following four procedures fall in the oblique translation.
1) Transposition:
It is a change of one part of speech for another without changing the sense. For example,
You talked out loud
Page no. 143
Page no. 213
He slept heavily

29
‘I was very extravagant darling’, she said,
‘but it’s a fine.’
Page no. 148
Page no. 161
In the first example, the word „loud‟ is a verb in the source language which shows some action.
While in its translation it has been changed to noun that is „bol‟. Similarly in the second
example, the word „slept‟ is a verb in the source language which shows some action. While in its
translation it has been changed to noun that is „neend‟
2) Modulation:
It changes the semantics and point of view of source language. It exists in sentences where
the translator changes the sentences in such a way e.g. affirmative to negative, active to
passive, etc. but meaning remains the same as shown through the given examples. For
example,
If I had brains I wouldn‟t be here.
Why haven‟t you brains,anarchist?
the Austrians were sons ofbitches
I shook hands with the third doctor
Page no. 98. . Page no. 107
you wouldn’t be in bed

30
Page no. 108
Page no. 99
we’re all friends here
I didn’t say anything
no one was talking
3) Equivalence:
Equivalence is used to refer to the cases where different languages describe the same
situation by different stylistic or structural means.
ST (Source
Text)
TT (Target Text)
It was all right.
Page no.185
Page no. 273
It is a very unattractive
wisdom
Page no. 187
Page no. 279
I said I had killed plenty
Page no. 95
Page no. 104

31
And much lifting I was
upstairs and in bed
again
Page no. 95
Page no. 104
an army travels on its
stomach
Page no. 195
Page no. 216
In the above examples, the translator has used idioms and proverbial expressions while
translating simple sentences but still the meaning is fully conveyed.
4) Adaptation:
It involves the changing of cultural reference when a situation in the source language culture
doesn‟t exist in the target language culture. For example,
Go to hell
Page no. 52
Page no. 73
I hope to Christ not.
Page no. 149
Page no. 222
it was like being put to bed after early
supper
Page no. 72
Page no. 75
for Christ’s sweet sake take me to some
room
Page no. 83
Page no. 91
Christ, I say it’s rotten

32
I say it’s rotten. Jesus
Page no. 40
Page no. 39
Jesus Christ, ain’t this all a goddamn war?
they’ll shell the hell out of us
Page no. 52
Page no. 50
The given examples show that the writer has used or changed the words according to his beliefs
and cultural context.
KATHARINA REISS’S TEXT TYPOLPGY:
The target text (TT) i.e.Widaa-e-Jung is both an expressive and informative text.
The informative text is one which provides us information about the facts. In this case, the
target text provides us information about the details and horrors of the World War.
1. Language and Dimension:
Being aninformative text, the Target Text represents the full accounts of objects and figure.
Examples from the source and target texts are given below:
At the front they were advancing on the Carso,
they had taken Kuk across from Plava and
were taking the Bain-sizza plateau.
Page no. 85
Page no. 97

33
Many Germans in Italian uniform mixing with
the retreat in the North. That as one of those
things you always heard in the war
Page no. 209.
Page no. 232
Not in war times. I don’t think they let the
Italians cross the frontier.
Page no. 267
Page no. 296
I am sorry, we haven’t any rolls in war time
Page no. 268.
Page no. 297
The above examples show that the text type is „plain communication of facts‟ i.e. it is
informative and referential.
2. Text Focus:
The Target Text (TT) is content-focused and descriptive as well. For example:
We walked down the stairs instead of
taking the elevator. The carpet on the
stairs was worn. I had paid for the
dinner.
Page no. 115
Page no. 167
We got into Milan early inthe morning
and they unloadedus in the freight

34
yard. An ambulance took me to the
American hospital
Page no. 62
Page no. 89
Catherine Barkley was greatly liked by
the nurses because she would do night
duty indefinitely.
Page no. 107
Page no. 118
At the start of the winter came the
permanent rain and with the rain came
the cholera. But it was checked and in
the end only seven thousand died of it
in the army.
Page no. 7
(page no. 6)
The text is expressive text and transmits the aesthetic and artistic form of Source text. The
translation uses the „identifying‟ method; still the translator is adopting the stand point of ST
author. For example,
ST
(Source
Text)
TT (Target Text)
I watched
her
brushing
her hair,
holding
her head
so the
Page no. 275

35
weight of
her hair
all came
on one
side. It
was dark
outside
and the
light over
the head
of the bed
shone on
her hair
and on
her neck.
Page no.
184
When I
awake
after the
operation
I had not
been
away.
You do
not go
away
(page no 117)

36
They only
choke
you. It is
not like
dying, it
is just a
chemical
choking,
so you do
not feel,
and
afterward
s you
might as
well have
been
drunk
except
that when
you throw
up
nothing
comes but
bile and
you do
not feel
better
afterward
s

37
Page no.
106
I am
afraid of
rain
because
sometime
s I see me
dead in it
Page no.
125
Page no. 133
The
shutters
were up
but it was
still going
on inside.
Page no.
38
Page
no. 36
It seems
she had
one
hemorrha
ge after
another.
They
couldn’t
Page no. 352

38
stop it. I
went into
the room
and
stayed
with
Catherine
until she
died. She
was
unconscio
us all the
time, and
it did not
take her
very long
to die
Page no.
317
Blow,
blow ye
Western
wind.
Page no.
191
Page no. 212
From the given examples, it can also be said that the text is a „creative composition‟ that is
aesthetic and expressive.
ASHFAQ AHMAD AS A TRANSLATOR:

39
Importance of translator is defined as; „...the translator is a bilingual mediating agent between
monolingual communication participants in two different language communities4
‟.
Role of a translator varies from culture to culture, country to country, and from text to text.
Translator acts as a mediator or reconciliatory and bridges the gap between source text (ST) and
aesthetics of the source text in the target text.
In the translation of the novel A Farewell to Arms as Widaa-e-Jang Ashfaq Ahmad has played a
role of both mediator and creator.
As a translator, Ashfaq Ahmad is first and foremost a mediator between the two parties for
whom mutual communication might otherwise be problematic. He not only possessed a bilingual
ability but also had bicultural vision. He has tried to overcome the incompatibilities which stand
in the way of transfer of meaning. There are certain signs which have the value in one cultural
community but are devoid of significance in another. Ashfaq Ahmad being a creative translator
has identified and resolved the disparity between two cultures.
Furthermore, the translation of the title of the novel (A farewell to Arms as Widaa-e-Jang) also
reflects his creative ability as a translator. The translation of the title of our source text is a
literary one. Because Ashfaq Ahmad has not translated it word for word but he has conveyed the
sense which renders the connotative power present in the original English words of the title.
Widaa- e -Jang reflects Ashfaq Ahmad‟s reading and defines him as a non ordinary reader. He
has also involved his own beliefs and values in the process of translation and has also skipped
certain sentences and paragraphs in his translation. In most part of the novel he has translated
many simple sentences in the form of proverbs.
Widaa-e-Jang reflects Ashfaq Ahmad‟s reading anddefines him as a non-ordinary reader. In
short, looking at the general and specific analysis of the novel, the translator‟s role as a creator
and mediator can be justified. He has attempted to present the original text‟s theme and main
idea with great fidelity and care.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION:
4
David Katan‟s Translating Cultures(2004: 16).

40
An analysis of the target text(TT) and the source text(ST) i.e. Farewell to the arms by Earnest
Hemingway and Wida-e-Jung by Ashfaq Ahmed, exhibits the Equivalent effect, No formal
correspondence, Proverbial expressions, Natural and easy expressions, Sense for sense
translation, Changed according to personal beliefs, Skipping of paragraphs and sentences,
Aesthetics is preserved/maintained
All the four models given above are fully applicable to the translation of A Farewell to Arms. Ina
crux it can be said that, Widaa-e-Jung is a fine translation of A Farewell to Arms by Ashfaq
Ahmed. It carries traces of different approaches and theoretical frameworks of translation given
by theorists.

41
REFERENCES:
Introducing Translation Studies by Jeremy Munday, 2nd Edition
A Farewell To Arms by Earnest Hemingway
Widaa-e-Jang by Ashfaq Ahmed
http://nativepakistan.com/quotes-of-ashfaq-ahmed/
http://ashfaqahmedsahab.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/introduction-ashfaq-ahmed/

‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS WIDAA-E-JUNG’

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to ‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS WIDAA-E-JUNG’

Similar to ‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS WIDAA-E-JUNG’ (20)

More from Hameel Khan

More from Hameel Khan (19)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

‘TRANSLATION ANALYSIS OF A FAREWELL TO ARMS WRITTEN BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY, TRANSLATED BY ASHFAQ AHMAD AS WIDAA-E-JUNG’