SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 29
Dietary Protein and Energy Effects on Broiler
        Live Performance to 42 Days


           F. I. L. Hernandez1, D. R. Korver2, R. A. Renema2,
                             M. J. Zuidhof1
1
    Alberta Agriculture and Food, Agriculture Research Division, AB. Canada
2
    Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, AB. Canada
The Problem

• Story of the fat chicken – Producers were paid
  for BW and this resulted in carcasses with high
  fat content
Objective

•Evaluate the effects of different protein and
energy levels on performance of broilers
Materials and Methods

• 3,700 Chicks
• 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 factorial experiment
   – 2 sexes
   – 2 prestarter nutrient densities (High and Low)
       • Prestarters were nested within Sex x ME x DBP
   – 3 levels of metabolizable energy (ME) - 94, 97 and 100
     % of COBB recommendations for maximizing growth
     and FCR
   – 5 levels of dietary balanced protein (DBP) – 85, 92.5,
     100, 107.5 and 115 % of recommendations
Materials and Methods

• Parameters measured
   – Body weight
   – Feed intake
   – Carcass yield (breast, wings, legs)
• Statistical analysis
   – Data were analyzed as a four way factorial using the
     MIXED procedure of SAS (2003)
Hypothesis

• High energy diets increase deposition as fat
• High protein diets increase lean meat
• Decrease dietary protein reduce yield
• Decrease dietary protein increase feed intake
Results
Effect of Early Nutrition on BW
          4.0
          3.8
          3.6
          3.4
          3.2
          3.0
          2.8
          2.6
          2.4                                              2.80
BW (kg)




          2.2
          2.0
          1.8                                              2.70




                                                 BW (kg)
          1.6
          1.4                                              2.60
          1.2
          1.0                                              2.50
          0.8                                                     High     Low
          0.6
          0.4
          0.2                                                      Prestarter
          0.0
                0     7   11   14   21     28              36      42       49     56
                                    Age (days)
                                                                         PS Level P<0.0001
Effect of ME on 42 d BW


          2.7
BW (kg)




          2.5




          2.3
                  94.0%                97.0%          100.0%
                          Energy (% of recommended)
                                                               P=0.40
Ef fect of DBP on 42 d BW

                            a           a             a
          2.7
                  b                                        b
BW (kg)




          2.5




          2.3
                 85.0%     92.5%      100.0%     107.5%   115.0%
                         Protein (% of recommended)
                                                            P=0.0005
BW (42 d)
                 a
          2.9
BW (kg)




          2.7


                                   b
          2.5


          2.3
                Males            Females
                          Sex
                                           P<0.0001
Body Weight (42 d)                      Males
                                                                 Females




                                                                               Energy (% of recommended)
          3.1
          2.9
BW (kg)




                                                                         94%
          2.7
                                                                      97%
          2.5
                                                                    100%
          2.3
                85.0%


                        92.5%


                                  100.0%


                                            107.5%


                                                     115.0%
                                                              DBP*ME*Sex P=0.003
                                                                 ME*Sex P=0.025
                        Protein (% of recommended)              DBP*Sex P=0.0003
Feed Intake (0 - 42 d)
           6100.0
                               ab         a          ab
                     b                                        b

           4100.0
Feed (g)




           2100.0



            100.0
                    85.0%     92.5%     100.0%     107.5%   115.0%
                            Protein (% of recommended)
                                                                  P=0.04
Effect of Energy on Feed Intake
           6100



           4100
Feed (g)




           2100



           100
                      94.0%           97.0%           100.0%
                          Energy (% of recommended)
                                                               P=0.17
Effect of Sex on Feed Intake to 42 d
           6100.0
                         a
                                            b

           4100.0
Feed (g)




           2100.0



            100.0
                        Males             Females
                                Sex
                                                    P<0.0001
Feed Intake                        Males
                                                                     Females




                                                                                 Energy (% of recommended)
           6100
Feed (g)




           4100                                                           94%
           2100                                                          97%
                                                                        100%
           100
                  85.0%




                                                         115.0%
                              92.5%


                                       100.0%


                                                107.5%
                                                                  DBP*ME*Sex P=0.027
                                                                     ME*Sex P=0.849
                          Protein (% of recommended)                 DBP*Sex P=0.014
Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d)

      2.5
                    2.061 a
      2.0                              1.915 b


      1.5
FCR




      1.0


      0.5


      0.0
                   Females    Sex      Males
                                                 Sex P<0.0001
Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d)
      2.5                                                      Males
                                                               Females
                              abc           a         ab         abcd
                bcd
      2.0

      1.5
FCR




      1.0

      0.5

      0.0
              85.0%        92.5%       100.0%      107.5%     115.0%
                      Protein (% of recommended)
                                                       Sex*DBP P<0.0650
Effect of Dietary Balance Protein on
                                Carcass Yield
             2500
                                         ab          a
                       bc      bc                             c      EBW
             2000
                                                                     Other
Weight (g)




             1500
                       ab      a         bc         bc        c      Wings
             1000
                                                                     Legs
              500
                       c      bc         ab          a        a      Breast
                0
                      85.0%   92.5%    100.0%     107.5%    115.0%
                              Protein (% of recommended)   Evis-BW P=0.0076
                                                             Wings P<0.0001
                                                             Breast P<0.0001
Breast Yield
             510
                                                           a
             500                                  a
                                      ab
Weight (g)




             490            bc

                    c
             480

             470

             460
                   85.0%   92.5%    100.0%      107.5%   115.0%
                           Protein (% of recommended)
                                                           P<0.0001
Carcass Yield
             2500

             2000
                                                               Other
Weight (g)




             1500
                     ab                  b               a     Wings
             1000
                                                               Legs
             500
                     a                  ab               b     Breast
               0
                    94.0%             97.0%           100.0%
                          Energy (% of recommended)
                                                      Wings P=0.0860
                                                      Breast P=0.0811
Carcass Yield

             2500                      a        Ev-BW
                      b
             2000
                                                Other
Weight (g)




             1500

             1000
                      b                a        Wings
             500                                Legs
                                                Breast
               0
                    Females           Males
                              Sex          Evis-BW P<0.0001
                                           Wings P=0.0018
                                           Breast P=0.0759
Effect of Prestarter on Carcass Yield

             2500
                         a                   b         EBW
             2000
Weight (g)




             1500

             1000                                      Wings

                                                       Legs
             500
                                                       Breast
               0
                        High                Low
                               Prestarter        Evis-BW P=0.0118
                                                   Wings P=0.0748
                                                   Breast P=0.9251
Feed Intake to 11 d
                400
                      341    335                337   326       Males
                300                                             Females
Feed (g/bird)




                200


                100


                 0
                        High                      Low           PS P=0.14
                                   Prestarter                  Sex P=0.09
                                                            PS*Sex P=0.66
Nutrient Intakes to 11 d
                     100                                  1200
                                a
                                                      b   1000




                                                                 Energy Intake (kcal)
                     80
Protein intake (g)




                                                          800
                     60     a
                                                                                            CP
                                                  b       600
                                                                                            ME
                     40
                                                          400
                     20                                   200

                      0                                   0
                           High                  Low                                       CP       ME

                                    Prestarter            PS                            <.0001   0.0002
                                                          Sex                           0.0879   0.0882
                                                          PS*Sex                        0.6661   0.6586
Conclusions

• High prestarter increased BW at 42 days
  – 2.73 vs 2.66 kg
• Breast yield increased with increasing DBP
  – 1 g of breast meat for every 1.5% increase in DBP
• Males were more efficient than females
  – 1.91 vs 2.06 FCR
Future Research



• Maximize carcass value
• Predict performance under different nutritional
  regimes
Acknowledgments

•   Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund
•   Agriculture and Food Council
•   Poultry Industry Council
•   University of Alberta
•   Alberta Agriculture and Food
•   Cobb-Vantress
•   Alberta Chicken Producers
•   Maple Leaf

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado

How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
ThinkNow
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Kurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 

Destacado (20)

Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 

Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz

  • 1. Dietary Protein and Energy Effects on Broiler Live Performance to 42 Days F. I. L. Hernandez1, D. R. Korver2, R. A. Renema2, M. J. Zuidhof1 1 Alberta Agriculture and Food, Agriculture Research Division, AB. Canada 2 Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, AB. Canada
  • 2. The Problem • Story of the fat chicken – Producers were paid for BW and this resulted in carcasses with high fat content
  • 3. Objective •Evaluate the effects of different protein and energy levels on performance of broilers
  • 4. Materials and Methods • 3,700 Chicks • 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 factorial experiment – 2 sexes – 2 prestarter nutrient densities (High and Low) • Prestarters were nested within Sex x ME x DBP – 3 levels of metabolizable energy (ME) - 94, 97 and 100 % of COBB recommendations for maximizing growth and FCR – 5 levels of dietary balanced protein (DBP) – 85, 92.5, 100, 107.5 and 115 % of recommendations
  • 5. Materials and Methods • Parameters measured – Body weight – Feed intake – Carcass yield (breast, wings, legs) • Statistical analysis – Data were analyzed as a four way factorial using the MIXED procedure of SAS (2003)
  • 6.
  • 7. Hypothesis • High energy diets increase deposition as fat • High protein diets increase lean meat • Decrease dietary protein reduce yield • Decrease dietary protein increase feed intake
  • 9. Effect of Early Nutrition on BW 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.80 BW (kg) 2.2 2.0 1.8 2.70 BW (kg) 1.6 1.4 2.60 1.2 1.0 2.50 0.8 High Low 0.6 0.4 0.2 Prestarter 0.0 0 7 11 14 21 28 36 42 49 56 Age (days) PS Level P<0.0001
  • 10. Effect of ME on 42 d BW 2.7 BW (kg) 2.5 2.3 94.0% 97.0% 100.0% Energy (% of recommended) P=0.40
  • 11. Ef fect of DBP on 42 d BW a a a 2.7 b b BW (kg) 2.5 2.3 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% Protein (% of recommended) P=0.0005
  • 12. BW (42 d) a 2.9 BW (kg) 2.7 b 2.5 2.3 Males Females Sex P<0.0001
  • 13. Body Weight (42 d) Males Females Energy (% of recommended) 3.1 2.9 BW (kg) 94% 2.7 97% 2.5 100% 2.3 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% DBP*ME*Sex P=0.003 ME*Sex P=0.025 Protein (% of recommended) DBP*Sex P=0.0003
  • 14. Feed Intake (0 - 42 d) 6100.0 ab a ab b b 4100.0 Feed (g) 2100.0 100.0 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% Protein (% of recommended) P=0.04
  • 15. Effect of Energy on Feed Intake 6100 4100 Feed (g) 2100 100 94.0% 97.0% 100.0% Energy (% of recommended) P=0.17
  • 16. Effect of Sex on Feed Intake to 42 d 6100.0 a b 4100.0 Feed (g) 2100.0 100.0 Males Females Sex P<0.0001
  • 17. Feed Intake Males Females Energy (% of recommended) 6100 Feed (g) 4100 94% 2100 97% 100% 100 85.0% 115.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% DBP*ME*Sex P=0.027 ME*Sex P=0.849 Protein (% of recommended) DBP*Sex P=0.014
  • 18. Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d) 2.5 2.061 a 2.0 1.915 b 1.5 FCR 1.0 0.5 0.0 Females Sex Males Sex P<0.0001
  • 19. Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d) 2.5 Males Females abc a ab abcd bcd 2.0 1.5 FCR 1.0 0.5 0.0 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% Protein (% of recommended) Sex*DBP P<0.0650
  • 20. Effect of Dietary Balance Protein on Carcass Yield 2500 ab a bc bc c EBW 2000 Other Weight (g) 1500 ab a bc bc c Wings 1000 Legs 500 c bc ab a a Breast 0 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% Protein (% of recommended) Evis-BW P=0.0076 Wings P<0.0001 Breast P<0.0001
  • 21. Breast Yield 510 a 500 a ab Weight (g) 490 bc c 480 470 460 85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0% Protein (% of recommended) P<0.0001
  • 22. Carcass Yield 2500 2000 Other Weight (g) 1500 ab b a Wings 1000 Legs 500 a ab b Breast 0 94.0% 97.0% 100.0% Energy (% of recommended) Wings P=0.0860 Breast P=0.0811
  • 23. Carcass Yield 2500 a Ev-BW b 2000 Other Weight (g) 1500 1000 b a Wings 500 Legs Breast 0 Females Males Sex Evis-BW P<0.0001 Wings P=0.0018 Breast P=0.0759
  • 24. Effect of Prestarter on Carcass Yield 2500 a b EBW 2000 Weight (g) 1500 1000 Wings Legs 500 Breast 0 High Low Prestarter Evis-BW P=0.0118 Wings P=0.0748 Breast P=0.9251
  • 25. Feed Intake to 11 d 400 341 335 337 326 Males 300 Females Feed (g/bird) 200 100 0 High Low PS P=0.14 Prestarter Sex P=0.09 PS*Sex P=0.66
  • 26. Nutrient Intakes to 11 d 100 1200 a b 1000 Energy Intake (kcal) 80 Protein intake (g) 800 60 a CP b 600 ME 40 400 20 200 0 0 High Low CP ME Prestarter PS <.0001 0.0002 Sex 0.0879 0.0882 PS*Sex 0.6661 0.6586
  • 27. Conclusions • High prestarter increased BW at 42 days – 2.73 vs 2.66 kg • Breast yield increased with increasing DBP – 1 g of breast meat for every 1.5% increase in DBP • Males were more efficient than females – 1.91 vs 2.06 FCR
  • 28. Future Research • Maximize carcass value • Predict performance under different nutritional regimes
  • 29. Acknowledgments • Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund • Agriculture and Food Council • Poultry Industry Council • University of Alberta • Alberta Agriculture and Food • Cobb-Vantress • Alberta Chicken Producers • Maple Leaf

Notas del editor

  1. Includes average value for pre-starter period