The social dimension of animal health surveillance systems: An interdisciplinary approach of social pressure in the process of disease reporting in Northern Thailand
•
1 recomendación•901 vistas
Presented by Aurélie Binot, Sophie Valeix, Attawit Kovitvadhi, Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux, Raphael Duboz, Mohan Timilsina, Suwicha Kasemsuwan and Marisa Peyre at the PENAPH First Technical Workshop, Chiangmai, Thailand, 11 – 13 December 2012.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (11)
Destacado
Destacado (15)
Similar a The social dimension of animal health surveillance systems: An interdisciplinary approach of social pressure in the process of disease reporting in Northern Thailand
Similar a The social dimension of animal health surveillance systems: An interdisciplinary approach of social pressure in the process of disease reporting in Northern Thailand (20)
Más de ILRI
Más de ILRI (20)
Último
Último (20)
The social dimension of animal health surveillance systems: An interdisciplinary approach of social pressure in the process of disease reporting in Northern Thailand
- 1. Management of Emerging Risks in SoutheastManagement of Emerging Risks in SoutheastManagement of Emerging Risks in SoutheastManagement of Emerging Risks in Southeast AsiaAsiaAsiaAsia The social dimension of animal health surveillance systems An interdisciplinary approach of social pressure in the process of disease reporting in Northern Thailand Aurélie Binot, Sophie Valeix, Attawit Kovitvadhi, Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux, Raphael Duboz, Mohan Timilsina, Suwicha Kasemsuwan, Marisa Peyre PENAPH first technical workshop Chiang Mai 11-13 December 2012
- 2. Social sciences inputs to surveillance systems designing Social, political (power issues) and economic stakes Risks representations and perceptions Communities empowerment finding solutions through participatory approaches © F. Monicat © F. Monicat Provide and implement recommendation for risk management (including surveillance response, health policies etc.) Anticipating problems in risk communication, capacity building
- 3. Merging together social & biomedical sciences… SOCIOLO GY ICT
- 4. ICTs for building bridges • Strengthening interactions between disciplines • Integrating data • Finding communication pathways ICT FOR SYNTHETIZING INFORMATION FOR SPREADING, SHARING AND DECREASING HETEROGENEITY • Central databases • Modeling approaches • Telecom • GIS Outbreaks Monitoring Scenario tree Modeling Frontline SMS Risk mapping & Spatial determinants
- 5. => First understand the community’s functioning patterns – who are the community members? – what are the power relationship between them? – major institutional agreements ? (land tenure, labor, loans...) – how does information circulate between them? Explore social interactions and behavior’s rules... How to tackle social factors linked to surveillance’s evaluation? “social pressures around animal health management not independent from general community functioning”
- 6. How to tackle social factors linked to surveillance’s evaluation? “social network analysis could help in analyzing and communicating data gathered through participatory process” Beyond official surveillance reporting system... Cartography & measure relationships, interactions btw peoples, groups, entities Beyond a description and interpretation of narratives... SNA
- 7. Participatory tools to approach the community based dynamics (not focusing on epidemiology!) Various & flexible tools = semi-structured interviews, participatory mapping, matrix scoring , proportional piling,…(57 interviews) Animal diseases surveillance : Social factors driving communities functioning
- 8. +continuous observation Identify stakeholders, observe practices, interactions... Participatory investigation of community dynamics => SNA modeling
- 9. - Various systems cohabiting (extensive ducks, fight cocks, intensive chicken farm,…) - DLD control measures in 2004/2005 = traumatism, with huge family, cultural, socioeconomic consequences at community level - Self-medication +++ - Low recourse to public vets Some characteristics of the community regarding AH
- 10. Information circulation Very frequent social contacts Fast spreading of information In-between role from powerful, influent CB level people (experienced farmers, notables, drug sellers) Low communication level with vets BetweenindividualsBetweengroups
- 11. Health & Risk Perception Low interest for infectious diseases in ducks health management Which acceptability for surveillance & control not tackling these problems? Diseases covered by these information flow
- 12. - General functioning of the community could shed light on the particular case of animal diseases management - Notables (land owners, powerful families) - Role in major crises management - Have the needed influential power to withhold information inside the community ... - Industrial Firms - private information circulation, - not integrated to the community-based system Major qualitative insights...
- 13. “No struggle between formal and informal surveillance... but find the complementary between the official and community-based systems” “Anthropological approach of the community patterns, using participatory tools and observation, benefitted from and to SNA”