Presented by Tom Randolph at the Vietnam Smallholder Pig Value Chain Team Meeting, Delhi, India, 30 April 2012.

1. VietnamValue Chain Development
Planning
More milk, meat and fish by and for the poor
Livestock and Fish CGIAR Research Program
Manesar, India
30 April-1 May 2012
Tom Randolph

2. Meeting Objectives
 Develop common understanding of objective and
approach
begin to define a country strategy
 Review and refine the implementation plan, including
individual roles and responsibilities, and agree on the
timetable for 2012
 Set of deliverables by Center, with level of effort
 Identify resource mobilization priorities and agree on
responsibilities
 Defined as deliverables

3. More milk, meat, and fish
by and for the poor
Overview

4. Reminder: Goal
More milk, meat and fish by and for the poor
To sustainably increase the productivity of
small-scale livestock and fish systems to
increase the availability and affordability of
animal-source foods for poor consumers and,
in doing so, reduce poverty through greater
participation by the poor along the whole value
chains for animal-source foods.

5. Basic Idea: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Traditional approach was piecemeal
Past research has focused specific aspects
of given value chains, commodities and country.
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country A
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country B
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country C
Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers
...in Country D

6. Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Addressing the whole value chain
R4D integrated to transform selected value chains
In targeted commodities and countries.
Consumers
Major intervention with development partners
Value chain development team + research partners
Strategic CRP 3.7 Cross-cutting Platforms
• Technology Generation
• Market Innovation
• Targeting & Impact
INTERVENTIONS TO GLOBAL RESEARCH
SCALE OUT REGIONALLY PUBLIC GOODS

7. Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target:
double production in
x poor households Scaling out
Development Partners
$90m
Knowledge Partners $10m
CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10m
Time 10 years

8. FOCUS: 9 Target Value Chains
SHEEP & GOATS
AQUACULTURE
PIGS
DAIRY

9. Delivering CRP3.7 Livestock + Fish
Structure: Six integrated Components
5 Targeting: Foresight, prioritization,
Technology 4 Value chain development
development:
1 Health
Consumers
2 Genetics
3 Feeds Commodity X in Country Y
6Cross-cutting: gender, impact, M&E, comms, capacity building

10. A generic livestock value chain
N Taylor
10

11. A value chain is the set of actors, transactions,
A generic livestock value chain
information flows, and institutions that enable
N Taylor
value to be delivered to the customer (Baker 2007)
11

12. The Value Chain Development Component:
Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
Engagement
Assessment
Piloting
Validating
Learning at scale
Tackling the harder constraints
Time 10 years

13. Engagement / Assessment
Engagement
• Scoping R&D partners
• Stakeholder event
• Catalyze alliance
Assessment
• Reviews
Assessment
• Tool development
Reviews
• Site selection
• Tool development
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• Identify • In-depth VC assessment
best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

14. Piloting / Validating
Piloting
• Baseline studies
• Action-research trials
Validating
• Field trials
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

15. Update on the LaF CRP
 Preliminary planning meeting held Sept 2011
 Officially started January 1st 2012
 Planning still ongoing
 Strategy logframe
 Assigning resources
 How many activities can be supported?
 Unrestricted portion fully funded (CG Fund)
 Large gap in restricted funded portion  will
require major resource mobilization effort

16. More meat, milk and fish
by and for the poor
The Planning Process

17. The Planning Horizon
1 Objective 1 Outcome
Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
1
3 4 Output 4
2
Time
3rd year 6-10 years

18. The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
Projects Budget
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

19. The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
#1 Starting
Projects Budget
point
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

20. The Planning Challenge
Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan &
#1 Starting
Projects Budget
point
1 2 Subsidy ??
Staff time XX X X XX
Budget
Other costs XX X X X
Deliverables XX X X Work plan
#2 Still to
negotiate
Outputs Other LaF
(Milestones) CRP

21. Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target:
double production in
x poor households Scaling out
Development Partners
$90m
Knowledge Partners $10m
CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10m
Time 10 years

22. Engagement / Assessment
Engagement Output 1: Methods for
• Scoping R&D partners
identifying pro-poor
• Stakeholder event
upgrading opportunities in
• Catalyze alliance
animal-source food value
Assessment chains
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

23. Engagement / Assessment
Engagement
• Scoping R&D partners Output 2: R&D innovation
• Stakeholder event alliances created to promote
• Catalyze alliance target pro-poor value chains
Assessment
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

24. Engagement / Assessment
Engagement Output 3: Pro-poor, gender-
• Scoping R&D partners
sensitive technological and
• Stakeholder event
institutional options devised
• Catalyze alliance
and validated for each target
Assessment value chain
• Reviews
• Tool development
• Site selection
• Rapid VC assessment
• Situational analysis
• Framework for assessing VC performance
• Identify best-bet intervention
• In-depth VC assessment
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

25. Piloting / Validating
Piloting
• Baseline studies
• Action-research trials
Output 4: Integrated pro-
poor, gender-sensitive
intervention strategies
formulated and piloted in Validating
each target value chain • Field trials
Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year

26. Working toward interventions
for impact at scale
Begins
happening in
Years 3-5
Engagement
Assessment
Piloting
Validating
Learning at scale
Tackling the harder constraints
Time 10 years