Interest in integrated STEM curricula has grown recently, but there is little research on its impact. This presentation examines differences in performance on an engineering design assessment of 8th grade students who did or did not participate in a series of engineering focused modules during middle school as part of their regular curriculum. The students’ in the school that included the curriculum scored higher on three of four dimensions measured on the scoring rubric: Depth of thinking, expertise needed to create a solution, and the use and interpretation of data. These outcomes were independent of the student’s fifth grade achievement level. The implications of these results for the integrated STEM curriculum student and for assessing engineering design process are discussed.
1. The Impact of Engineering
Focused Modules on the
Engineering Design Knowledge
of 8th Graders
James P. Van Haneghan & Jessica M. Harlan
University of South Alabama
Melissa D. Dean
Mobile Area Education Foundation
This material was partially supported by NSF Award DRL- 0918769. Any opinions,
findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
2. Engaging Youth through Engineering
Classroom-based
integrated STEM
experiences
Implemented by math and
science teachers
6. Theoretical Foundations
Bailey & Szabo, 2006
Critical analysis of the design process
Atman, et al., 2008
Depth and breadth of thinking about
complex environmental problems
Bransford & Schwartz, 1999
Transfer as preparation for future
learning
7. 8th Grade Task
How could this happen?
Common injury
New kind of seatbelt?
Julie’s grandmother is in a car accident and breaks
several ribs
8. Depth &
breadth of
thinking
Team skills
& expertise
needed
Critique of
another’s
design
Use of
research &
data
Engineering
Habits of
Mind
9. Rubric Scoring
0 1 2 3
No response or
irrelevant response
Integrates &
applies engineering
design principles
10. On 3 of 4 dimensions, participating students scored
higher than comparison students
0 1 2 3
Use of research & data**
Critique of another’s design**
Team skills & expertise needed
Depth & breadth of thinking*
Comparison
Participating
*p < .02 **p < .005
14. Transfer of Learning
Need further development & investigation
Multi-site study
New administration methods
Examine across age & experience
15. Questions?
James Van Haneghan: jvanhane@southalabama.edu
Jessica Harlan: jmh1324@jagmail.southalabama.edu
Melissa Dean: mdean@maef.net
Notas del editor
Engineering is the “hook” to teach core math and science concepts
Kids experience the modules in 6, 7, 8 grades
Each module uses engineering to teach concepts in other areas. In this module, students are creating wind turbines for renewable energy
In this 8th grade module, students are creating a biodegradable hockey puck made out of biodegradable plant based plastic.
As you can see, while each module includes work in each STEM area, the content differs dramatically from module to module.
Common thread is design process
Multiple grade level modules
Different areas of engineering
Different math and science content
Students are asked to write out their responses to four sets of prompts that are intended to measure four dimensions of what we’ve called “engineering habits of mind”
What needs to be known before beginning?
What skills & expertise are needed on the team?
Another team tried to solve this. What did they do well? What did they do poorly?
How could you use given data to solve the problem? What other research/data would be useful?
Score responses on each dimension using a detailed rubric, where responses can range from 0 to 3
Note that the use of research and data dimension was particularly low – this was the only dimension where we saw an impact for ethnicity
Black students performed lower on this dimension across schools
If students had gotten all of the points available on each dimension, they could have earned a total of 12 points.
Although they performed nowhere near peak, the participating students obtained more points overall than did the comparison group students.
Importance of teaming skills
Girls mentioned this more than boys
Black students at participating school mentioned this more than at comparison school
Critiquing design
Black students at participating school identified something the team did well more often
While we hope that this is a general thread or skill, we still need to show that there’s an underlying construct among different sets of these tasks – performance across contexts, different levels of expertise