SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 2
Descargar para leer sin conexión
COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
                          66 Lawyers Chambers
                    Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
                               Members:
            Ram Jethmalani Shanti Bhushan Rajendra Sachar
      D.S. Tewatia  Anil Divan     Indira Jaisingh    Kamini Jaiswal
       Prashant Bhushan Arvind Nigam Convener: Hardev Singh


To,
Justice Y.K. Sabharwal
Chief Justice of India
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi

                                                                           12/7/06

Subject: Information regarding improper and illegal acquisition of property by
Justice Jagdish Bhalla, Presiding judge of the High Court at Lucknow, and his close
relatives

Dear Chief Justice,
We are in receipt of information and documents which suggest that Justice Jagdish
Bhalla, the senior judge of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court and his close
relatives have acquired large amounts of immovable property in Lucknow and Noida by
questionable means. The information and documents available with us show the
following:

That in 2003 Mrs. Renu Bhalla, the wife of Justice Bhalla, has purchased a plot of 7,200
sq Metres near the Noida/Greater Noida expressway from persons who are described by
the ADM as the land Mafia who had purportedly illegally acquired these properties
which were owned by the government/Gaon Sabhas. This plot is said by the ADM to
have been worth 7.2 Crores and has been purchased by Mrs. Bhalla from the land Mafia
for a consideration of merely 5 lacs!. The officials say that the land Mafia persons who
illegally grabbed this land and against whom various criminal cases are pending sold part
of this land to Mrs. Bhalla and other influencial persons to use their influence to escape
the consequences of their illegal acts. Copies of the letters of the ADM to the DM Noida
dated 21/6/05 and the letter of the Upper Ziladhikary to the DM Noida, dated 30/9/05
which explain the above facts are enclosed with this letter.

It is inconceivable that Mrs. Bhalla could have entered into such a transaction innocently
and without the knowledge of Justice Bhalla. The facts enumerated in the enclosed letters
are very serious and they need an urgent investigation by investigators who are under the
control of the Supreme Court. If the facts as mentioned are borne out, they cast very
serious aspersions on the integrity of Justice Bhalla, and would also amount to serious
offences for which appropriate action would need to be taken.

We have also been given details of a large number of allotment of plots in Lucknow to
Justice Bhalla and his close relatives, in very unusual circumstances, by canceling the
allotment to other persons and by changing the plot sizes contrary to rules. Some of these
cases were the subject matter of proceedings before the Lok Ayukta. A note mentioning
the details of such allotments which has come to us, along with some supporting
documents are also annexed. The allotment of such a large number of plots to Justice
Bhalla’s close relatives in such an unusual manner also gives rise to a strong suspicion
that his influence has been used for such allotments. This is also a matter which needs to
be investigated, particularly since we understand that Justice Bhalla is also being
considered for appointment as Chief Justice in some High Court.

Some of our senior members would be happy to meet you in person to discuss this
serious matter and what needs to be done about this. We are also sending copies of this
letter to other members of the collegium for their information as well.

Sincerely,

Más contenido relacionado

Más de JudicialReform13

Más de JudicialReform13 (20)

Contempt article pb
Contempt article pbContempt article pb
Contempt article pb
 
Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01
 
Coja resolution 13.12.02
Coja resolution 13.12.02Coja resolution 13.12.02
Coja resolution 13.12.02
 
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsCnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
 
Cjirefuted
CjirefutedCjirefuted
Cjirefuted
 
Cji silence
Cji silenceCji silence
Cji silence
 
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assestsCji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests
 
Cji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ieCji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ie
 
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiCji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
 
Cjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentCjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_president
 
Cjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebelloCjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebello
 
Cjar brochure
Cjar brochureCjar brochure
Cjar brochure
 
Cja comments on bill
Cja   comments on billCja   comments on bill
Cja comments on bill
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
 
Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1
 
Cic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsCic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointments
 
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumChief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
 
Changing trends pil
Changing trends pilChanging trends pil
Changing trends pil
 
Centre moves to_impreach_toi
Centre moves to_impreach_toiCentre moves to_impreach_toi
Centre moves to_impreach_toi
 

Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla

  • 1. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 66 Lawyers Chambers Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Members: Ram Jethmalani Shanti Bhushan Rajendra Sachar D.S. Tewatia Anil Divan Indira Jaisingh Kamini Jaiswal Prashant Bhushan Arvind Nigam Convener: Hardev Singh To, Justice Y.K. Sabharwal Chief Justice of India Supreme Court of India New Delhi 12/7/06 Subject: Information regarding improper and illegal acquisition of property by Justice Jagdish Bhalla, Presiding judge of the High Court at Lucknow, and his close relatives Dear Chief Justice, We are in receipt of information and documents which suggest that Justice Jagdish Bhalla, the senior judge of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court and his close relatives have acquired large amounts of immovable property in Lucknow and Noida by questionable means. The information and documents available with us show the following: That in 2003 Mrs. Renu Bhalla, the wife of Justice Bhalla, has purchased a plot of 7,200 sq Metres near the Noida/Greater Noida expressway from persons who are described by the ADM as the land Mafia who had purportedly illegally acquired these properties which were owned by the government/Gaon Sabhas. This plot is said by the ADM to have been worth 7.2 Crores and has been purchased by Mrs. Bhalla from the land Mafia for a consideration of merely 5 lacs!. The officials say that the land Mafia persons who illegally grabbed this land and against whom various criminal cases are pending sold part of this land to Mrs. Bhalla and other influencial persons to use their influence to escape the consequences of their illegal acts. Copies of the letters of the ADM to the DM Noida dated 21/6/05 and the letter of the Upper Ziladhikary to the DM Noida, dated 30/9/05 which explain the above facts are enclosed with this letter. It is inconceivable that Mrs. Bhalla could have entered into such a transaction innocently and without the knowledge of Justice Bhalla. The facts enumerated in the enclosed letters are very serious and they need an urgent investigation by investigators who are under the control of the Supreme Court. If the facts as mentioned are borne out, they cast very
  • 2. serious aspersions on the integrity of Justice Bhalla, and would also amount to serious offences for which appropriate action would need to be taken. We have also been given details of a large number of allotment of plots in Lucknow to Justice Bhalla and his close relatives, in very unusual circumstances, by canceling the allotment to other persons and by changing the plot sizes contrary to rules. Some of these cases were the subject matter of proceedings before the Lok Ayukta. A note mentioning the details of such allotments which has come to us, along with some supporting documents are also annexed. The allotment of such a large number of plots to Justice Bhalla’s close relatives in such an unusual manner also gives rise to a strong suspicion that his influence has been used for such allotments. This is also a matter which needs to be investigated, particularly since we understand that Justice Bhalla is also being considered for appointment as Chief Justice in some High Court. Some of our senior members would be happy to meet you in person to discuss this serious matter and what needs to be done about this. We are also sending copies of this letter to other members of the collegium for their information as well. Sincerely,