SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 23
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Herman Miller
Herman Miller, Inc. (HM) is the second-largest office furniture manufacturer in the world
by production volume and revenues. Historically, HM’s success and growth have been
driven by design excellence (including the Aeron chair and the Eames lounge chair) and
innovation (HM invented “systems furniture” or cubicles in 1968, revolutionizing office
spaces worldwide). Products are manufactured and assembled for the large, medium,
small, and home office (SOHO) markets from millions of products and product
variations. Despite the fact that office furniture is considered “low tech,” the company
has firmly embraced technology, the Net, and organizational flexibility in pursuit of
further excellence.

There is no doubt that HM is successful and revolutionary. Fiscal year 2000 revenues
were $1.9 billion and the average five-year growth was 13.2% in an industry that grew at
7% over that same time period.1 HM’s 7% net profit is the highest in the industry. As of
February 15, 2001, the company’s price/earnings ratio of 13.5 reflects success in the
market given the industry average ratio of 10.02. In the first six months of fiscal 2001 (to
December 2000), sales and orders grew in excess of 23% compared to industry growth of
8.8% and 7.0% for sales and orders respectively for the same period.3

Business Context
The traditional custom furniture industry targets 100+ seat (employee) firms with
elaborate office design needs. Many customers view office furniture as a strategic
purchase that will increase productivity. Design and quality are the main buying criteria,
with less emphasis on delivery time. By the mid 1990s this market segment was stagnant,
and manufacturers were competing on price, turning what was previously a custom
product into a commodity.

Industry consolidation characterized the 1990s. At the start of the decade the industry had
only one manufacturer with sales over $1 billion. By 2000, through acquisitions and
organic growth, four companies clocked in over the $1.5 billion mark, with Steelcase (the
largest) realizing over $3 billion in revenue.4 These larger companies, HM among them,
invested heavily in manufacturing and inventory management software to further exploit
economies of scale in custom manufacturing. HM also created a second supply chain
called SQA (simple, quick, and affordable) where suppliers provide semi-finished
products that are assembled by HM. Customers have less choice but products arrive much
faster, in as little as 5-20 days.

In 1999 and 2000 the market seesawed. According to the Business and Institutional
Furniture Manufacturers Association (BIFMA), the office furniture market shrunk in
1999 (-1%) but rebounded in 2000 (9%). The 2001 forecast is for a slowdown in growth
to 5.6%. Market dynamics are also changing: “Much of the growth in the US economy is
1
  Herman Miller 2000 annual report http://www.hermanmiller.com/us/pdfs/investors/00ar.PDF.
2
  Hoovers http://www.hoovers.com/enterprise/landscape/6/0,3091,13676,00.html.
3
  Hoovers, Herman Miller Feb 5 press release http://www.hermanmiller.com/us/index.bbk/10422.
4
  1999 Herman Miller financial presentation, www.hermanmiller.com/investors/dlpresentations.html.


1
occurring in small and medium-sized companies. Many Fortune 500 companies are
downsizing and, as a result, are not requiring furniture for new employees.”5 The SOHO
(small office home office) market segment has different product and service needs than
larger customers, including more sensitivity to price and delivery time. HM’s SQA line
was created to address these needs.

BIFMA states that competitors are concentrating on cost control and production
efficiency to keep prices down. Also, “differentiation…based on service is often the only
way to distinguish oneself from competitors.”6

Herman Miller responded to these business conditions by focusing on three strategic
goals:

    •   Differentiate on superior customer service. HM focuses on providing the fastest, most
        accurate delivery in the industry. The on-time, accurate shipment rate is over 99%. The
        company’s 5-28 day delivery time leads the industry. 7
    •   Improve speed to market of new products. Drew Schramm (vice president, supply chain
        management) estimates that HM can bring new products to market 15%-20% faster than
        the competition.8
    •   Create new markets and increase the pace of innovation in the industry. For HM,
        creating a new market means one of two things: being first to attack a market segment
        like SOHO; or creating new systems that improve design efficiency.


Challenges and Opportunities
HM recognized that capitalizing on new opportunities, like the growing SOHO market,
required new production and service skill-sets. To offer semi-customized office furniture
systems faster and cheaper, HM needed to operate with more speed and agility. There
were also clear implications for HM’s relationships with suppliers and dealers. Business
processes—from supply and inventory management to ordering and design—had to be
aligned and integrated with production in order to respond quickly and accurately to
market demands.

HM’s large, diverse supplier base presented an additional challenge. It involves over 600
suppliers (125 of them “prime”), ranging from enormous conglomerates to tiny “mom
and pop” shops, each with different levels of technical sophistication, importance to HM
operations, and financial strength. HM’s goal is to empower and collaborate with
suppliers, so both parties realize greater value from the relationship. For example, HM
wants suppliers to deliver higher value, semi-finished goods rather than commodities.


5
  BIFMA industry analysis: http://www.bifma.org/stats/stats_over2.html.
6
  BIFMA industry analysis: http://www.bifma.org/stats/stats_over2.html.
7
  Mark Schurman, director of corporate communications, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave Cosgrave
and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 22 January 2001.
8
  Drew Schramm, vice president supply chain management, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave
Cosgrave and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 22 January 2001.


2
Gaining alignment with the dealer community (still responsible for 70% of HM’s sales)
would also prove challenging. Though HM continues to view dealers as value-adding
intermediaries, it acknowledges that the nature of their value is changing. By offering
new integrated design, sales, and order management tools, HM helps dealers operate
more effectively and focus on higher value customer relationship management and
service activities.

HM uses ICC to achieve speed to market and rapid innovation. Only by working more
closely and collaboratively with suppliers and dealers can HM create and dominate new
markets. Herman Miller was among the first in the industry to understand these changing
relationship dynamics. Says Schramm; “Our competitors thought that we were just doing
rapid delivery.”9 In reality, HM reinvented the entire supply chain.


ICC Deployment
Herman Miller’s ICC deployment strategies contribute to all three strategic goals shown
in Figure 1 below. Technology and the Internet are used to deploy information
intelligently and distribute decision-making.

Strategic Goals        Deployment Strategy                   Result
Superior customer             Supplier decisions based on         Accurate orders
service                  complete access to demand and         shipped on time.
                         inventory information
                              Total cost reduction                 Lower prices to
                                                               customers
                               Supplier rationalization            Improved quality and
                                                               speed due to increased
                                                               collaboration
                              Z-Axis visual design                 Faster time-to-order
                         collaboration
                              eZconnect customer Web               Easier to re-order
                         sites
Speed to market with          Collaborative product and            Faster design process
new products             process design
                              Commodity managers                    Better information flow
                                                               to all participants, better
                                                               forecasting
Creation of new                Collaborative product and            Faster design process.
markets                    process design                      Easier to predict trends as
                                                               input comes from multiple
                                                               sources.

                                  Figure 1




9
    Ibid.


3
Buy side

Herman Miller has gone beyond automating its supply re-order system; it lets suppliers
actually manage component inventories. Information deployment empowers suppliers to
make strategic decisions in response to changes in demand, resulting in lower inventory
and production costs throughout the supply chain. Suppliers have access to real-time
demand and production information through one of two Web-based information systems
—Supply-Net and SIGN. According to Bill Bundy, vice president of operations, “all that
a supplier needs to access demand and inventory data in real-time is a PC, a Web
browser, and a password.”10 Suppliers can also check electronic invoices for accuracy,
ensuring prompt payment and maintaining cash flow. HM even has an automated alert
system to warn suppliers of discrepancies in invoices or orders. This saves both HM and
the supplier wasted time and effort in chasing down problems.

HM also collaborates closely with suppliers to reduce total component costs. By
analyzing costs at any point in the supply chain, components and processes can be
singled out and analyzed for cost reductions. This is very different from the traditional
model where manufacturers simply impose price reductions on helpless suppliers. The
joint decision-making based on technology-enabled open information provides an
excellent case for intelligent collaborative commerce.

Herman Miller enables further supply side agility by collaborating with a smaller number
of suppliers to create deeper, more flexible relationships. The goal is to transform tactical,
reliability-focused relationships into strategic relationships rooted in information
transparency and trust. HM uses a “bucket system” to rate suppliers along quantitative
and qualitative measures. Bucket one suppliers not only deliver over 99% accuracy but
also share complete costing information and can adapt quickly to change. Bucket two,
three, and four suppliers share fewer and fewer of these qualities.

The criteria are strict: of HM’s 600+ suppliers, only two are in bucket one. Drew
Schramm indicates that the company has at least one major supplier who provides critical
parts but risks being replaced because of its policy of not sharing cost information. Royal
Plastics, a bucket one supplier, accesses SIGN and Supply-Net via the Net to get orders,
inventory, forecasting, and payment info. “It helps us plan and keep better track of
information,”11 says Perry Franco, Royal’s HM relationship manager. Franco indicates
that many manufacturers simply demand that suppliers reduce prices and lead times,
whereas HM “puts the tools in place to make it happen.” The tools enable intelligent
collaboration between HM and Royal to achieve mutually important goals of leaner
production. Similarly, Pent Assemblies shared cost breakdowns of a plastic part (labor,
material, transportation charges, overhead attributed, cycle time of machinery). HM and
Pent then were able to target the cost of the plastic resin as the main variable for the
entire cost of the part. Working together, the two companies came up with a solution that


10
   Bill Bundy, vice president of operations, Herman Miller, interview by Natalie Klym, Digital 4Sight, 11
April 2000.
11
   Perry Franco, Royal Plastics Inc., interview by Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 5 February 2001.


4
saves $50,000 annually. Schramm believes that there are many processes that can provide
similar (or greater) cost savings.12

Make side

Collaborative design pushes design information to all relevant parties and solicits input
from all simultaneously, thus reducing the cycle time and increasing product quality. This
practice allows HM to gain competitive advantage by increasing the pace of innovation in
the industry. The process can also be applied to manufacturing and sales process
innovation. As Schramm says, “our…suppliers literally have engineers sitting in our new
product development teams adding to the value of the product as it’s coming down the
pike.”13 He estimates that this collaboration allows HM to bring high quality new
products to market 15%-20% faster than the competition. Franco indicates that his
company will sometimes get involved two years before a product launch. Royal Plastics
can lower costs by designing parts that it knows are less labor-intensive.

HM intends to automate the design process by implementing software that enables virtual
collaboration, thus saving time and resources involved in physically co-locating
participants. Challenges may come from some suppliers who prefer to pay to send
engineers to HM to physically manipulate the product. “I am typically trying to get my
engineers to [HM’s] site to reduce headaches further on [during production],” says
Franco. “They like to touch and feel the product, understand how it is used and its
purpose.”14 For HM to be successful at virtual collaboration, it will have to simulate
product manipulation.

At HM the commodity manager is responsible for collecting information on a particular
commodity (plastics, wood, raw steel, steel products, etc.) and disseminating it
throughout the supply chain. The objective is to improve product design and trend
forecasting, both of which are necessary to increase speed to market and improve
production quality.

Sell side

Herman Miller shortens the sales cycle by embedding business and design process rules
into customer-facing technology. Shorter sales cycles increase dealer revenues without
increasing resources, and enable the pursuit of new market opportunities. Z-Axis is a
virtual room that allows dealers to collaborate with customers to design SQA systems in
real time. According to Lee Eilers “[Z-Axis] allows a customer to make better decisions
on a more timely basis so it can meet its targets.”15 The software intelligently displays
only the SQA furniture that can be delivered within the specified period and
automatically produces an accurate bill of materials. Traditionally, designing systems
12
   Drew Schramm, vice president supply chain management, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Terrence
Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 16 February 2001.
13
   Drew Schramm, op. cit., 22 January 2001.
14
   Perry Franco, op. cit.
15
   Lee Eilers, (()), Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave Cosgrave and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight,
22 January 2001.


5
with CAD (computer-aided design) is a long and arduous process, particularly where
changes are required. It could take months to complete sales to large customers. The cost
for sales to smaller customers was prohibitive. Z-Axis allows dealers to reduce the sell
cycle to weeks or even days and pursue the previously unfeasible medium-sized office
market.

eZconnect is a Web-enabled tool HM created for large customers to re-order, or make
changes to its order, online. Through eZconnect, dealers progress from a traditional
transactional relationship with the customer to a permanent contextual relationship that
keeps the dealer, and HM, permanently in the customer’s mind. It enhances the customer
experience by intelligently displaying only the furniture systems ordered and embedding
the order processing rules.

eZconnect was originally intended as a way for HM to connect directly with customers,
to increase speed and efficiency. Unfortunately it displaced dealers in the process.
“Literally, the product had to be enhanced or scrapped,”16 says Lee Eilers, who is in
charge of the product for HM. By collaborating with dealers (who felt they were being
disintermediated) and customers (who weren’t knowledgeable enough to order directly),
the tool was recast into its current form. Intelligent collaboration in technology redesign
creates the ongoing learning process that will help HM to “increase the clockspeed of the
industry.”17


Herman Miller’s technology is the glue that links all strategic goals. There is a very
experimental culture around technology. “It’s not a bad thing if technology doesn’t work
if we gain some intelligence about it”18 Drew Schramm says of the supply side software
he has used. The team applies the learning from the implementation of technology, even
failed technology, to be able to implement the next technology faster and more
efficiently. This organizational learning extends to technology that is used by suppliers
and customers.




16
   Ibid.
17
   Mark Schurman, op. cit. Clockspeed refers to the work of Dr. Charles Fine wherein he describes the pace
of innovation in an industry.
18
   Drew Schramm, op. cit. Which interview date?


6
FIGURE 2 – COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES & SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGIES



                                                                        SELL SIDE
                                                                     COLLABORATION
                           Focus on reduced time-to-order                        Z-Axis
                           Fast-accurate delivery and installation               eZconnect
                           Collaborative design                                  Oasis order entry system
                           Supply chain optimization                             hmstore.com




                                                                                                            Flex supply chain
                                                                                                            SQA (simple quick affordable)
         Complete demand and
                                                                                                             supply chain
         inventory information                       E  N
                                                   ID IO                                 CO M               ERP (JD Edwards, Baan)
         Total cost reduction                   Y S AT                                     L L AK           I2 Rhythm Factory Planner
         Supplier rationalization            BU BOR                                           AB E S
                                               A                                                OR IDE      Manufacturing Execution System
         Collaborative design                LL                                                    AT
         Supply chain optimization         CO                                                        IO
                                                                                                            Menlo Logistics
                                                            SIGN                                        N
                                                            Supply-Net
                                                            Menlo Logistics
                                                                                             Collaborative design
                                                                                             Commodity managers
                                                                                             Workflow planning



              LEGEND
     COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES
     ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
                                                                                                                    Source – Digital 4Sight Research

                                                                              Figure 2


On the sell side, Z-Axis and Oasis Order Entry System provide the interface for dealer
orders. Customers, on the other hand, enter purchase information directly on eZconnect
or hmstore.com. The next generation of software will be completely Web-based and
designed to maximize customer usability.

On the buy side, HM and Menlo Logistics send information to suppliers via SIGN and
Supply-Net. This information is critical in the decision-making processes of suppliers and
they have input into any updates to the technology.

The make-side software feeds SIGN and Supply-Net through enterprise software like
manufacturing resource planners, execution systems, and ERP systems. The company
currently uses two ERP systems but have plans to reduce it to one. HM creates a
collaborative learning environment where programmers and users can share experiences
and leverage the lessons learned over multiple technologies.

Measures of Success
Herman Miller’s reliability score (a measure of on-time and complete shipments) is a
measure of ICC success. Everyone in the value chain understands that 100% reliability
means that the ordering, production, and fulfillment processes are running effectively.
This measure of effectiveness is complemented by measures of efficiency that are the
result of collaborative processes. Efficiency is measured by the time it takes for new
products to get to market or for changes in design to be implemented in production, and
also includes cost reduction through better design and production methods. The company
view is that effectiveness brings new customers, while efficiency improves the bottom


7
line. HM’s high growth and industry leading 48.7% return on equity, 15.1% return on
assets, and 36.7% return on invested capital all indicate success in effectiveness and
efficiency.

Herman Miller also values its ability to create new markets and its ability to innovate at
any point in the value chain. To do so, HM relies on economic value-added19 (EVA)
metrics to push information and authority to innovate or make decisions out to the most
appropriate organizational level. Schramm’s technology team uses EVA to decide
whether or not it should implement a new technology: “If my group says it wants to
spend $25,000 on a new piece of software, and it’s going to be EVA positive, there isn’t a
person that stops us, we just go out and do it.”20 Achievement of EVA targets also drives
corporate bonuses, which creates further incentive to use it as a decision-making tool.

A telling metric for evaluating how well HM is working with its suppliers is how many
are in the bucket one category. As more suppliers progress into bucket one, HM will
benefit from having better collaboration and opportunities to increase effectiveness and
efficiency.

Future Vision
Herman Miller will face challenges in deploying its ICC strategy internationally. Face-to-
face collaborations are more expensive, and HM must rely on embedded business and
process rules in software to collaborate virtually and maintain effective distributed
decision-making. Success will lead to furniture systems tailored to local tastes, rapid
growth in market share, and continued flexibility. There may also be new cultural barriers
to face around the principle of open information. The benefits of information sharing for
total cost reduction and rapid innovation must be communicated and the bucket system
expanded.

The company also wants to gather and harness more customer knowledge to enhance the
purchase experience and design of future systems. According to Mark Schurman, HM is
“implementing collaborative, remote interactive technology in our design process that we
believe will add speed and reliability to our new product commercialization process
going forward, including a ‘virtual’ development lab.”21 To begin with, the company will
create a “customer team” to solicit feedback from customers directly. Conversations will
yield valuable information and be disseminated throughout the value chain. HM plans to
reap information on preferences and dislikes directly from dealer software and Web tools.
If a certain office layout is never chosen, it may need more focus. If, however, the layout
is seen by many customers but never chosen then it can be eliminated. This level of
unbiased detail is difficult to obtain from conversations and illustrates the importance of
the ICC principle of capturing business information at the source of creation.

19
   EVA is a measure designed to give companies a more accurate way of estimating real economic profit
than traditional financial metrics. It calculates after-tax net operating profit for a given period, less the total
cost of capital over the period.
20
   Drew Schramm, op. cit. Which interview date?
21
   Mark Schurman, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 16 February 2001.


8
General Electric
            “[Through the use of collaboration software, suppliers] will be working as if
          they’re part of our team. We think it will change the whole paradigm of how we
                                      work with suppliers.”22

                          Chris Fuselier, general manager of technology, GE Industrial Systems

General Electric is an expansive global corporation whose offerings range from jet
engines to financial services to the television show “Will and Grace.” Not only is the
company in the Fortune 500 (it’s #5), but 13 of its business units are big enough to
qualify individually. Business processes and markets vary widely from one business unit
to another—consider the difference in innovation strategies between nuclear reactors and
equipment leases.

Despite its size and varied mix of offerings, General Electric eschews the sluggish
behavior typical of a behemoth conglomerate. GE is an early adopter of innovative
business practices: the company was quick to embrace Economic Value Added23 as a key
business metric and passionately pursued Six Sigma excellence.24 During the 1980s,
when most companies divested assets and outsourced down to core competencies, GE,
under legendary CEO Jack Welch, constantly revamped its portfolio of businesses.
Retaining only business units that could consistently be ranked #1 or #2 in their markets,
the company sold $10 billion and purchased $19 billion worth of businesses. By 2000,
the traditional manufacturing company that Thomas Edison started in 1878 was
generating more than 60% of its revenue through services. This revenue is not just
realized by prized assets like GE Capital and NBC, but also through after-sales service
contracts on the company’s equipment business.

Business Context

Unlike many other global firms, GE did not react to dot-coms with panic or studied
indifference, but instead saw them as a challenge and opportunity. Welch announced that
the company’s e-commerce strategy would “change the DNA of GE forever by
energizing and revitalizing every corner of this company.”25 Welch imparted a sense of
urgency: “One cannot be tentative about this. Delay and you risk being cut out of your
own market, perhaps not by traditional competitors but by companies you never heard of
twenty-four months ago.”26 Simply adopting Internet technology and streamlining


22
   David Drucker, “Virtual Teams Light Up GE,” Internet Week, April 6, 2000.
         23
            EVA is a measure designed to give companies a more accurate way of estimating real economic
         profit than traditional financial metrics. It calculates after-tax net operating profit for a given
         period, less the total cost of capital over the period.
24
   Adapted from the 18th letter in the Greek alphabet, the term “sigma” is used in statistics as a measure of
variation. Each sigma represents a standard deviation. Within a set of random data, one sigma means 68%
of goods are acceptable and two sigma means 95% are acceptable. Six sigma means 99.999997% of goods
are acceptable (or 3.4 defects per million).
25
   Howard Rudnitsky, op. cit.
26
   Ibid.


9
operations will not generate a competitive advantage—all of GE’s competitors could do
that. To succeed, GE needed to leverage Internet technology faster with more focus.

Then, in the aftermath of the 2000 NASDAQ correction, many large companies let out a
relieved sigh, engaged in a little schadenfreude27 at the expense of some former dot-com
billionaires, and sent e-commerce to lower priority status. Not so General Electric. Welch
promises that e-business will realize $10 billion in savings between 2000 and 2002.
These savings will, in large part, result from GE’s aggressive adoption of collaborative
practices across business units and with customers and suppliers.

Challenges and Opportunities
GE’s corporate mission is to completely transform the company through effective use of
technology. Jack Welch set a clear direction that the entire company be digitized. In fact,
the company now tracks the number of computer printers and fax machines “retired” for
a given period, as proof that digitally captured data had replaced paper. This simple
metric understates GE’s challenge. Going ‘digital’ means patching together numerous
legacy systems, coordinating multiple data models and enabling more and better
communication between them.

GE’s overall corporate strategy has four components: continued globalization, further
pursuit of Sigma Six quality, increased revenue from services, and the pursuit of e-
business. Intelligent collaborative commerce, aided by corporate level investments in
technology, supports each of these initiatives.

ICC Deployment
In only four years GE’s Sigma Six quality initiative, a relentless commitment to reducing
production and performance errors to fewer than four per million, has become deeply
ingrained in corporate culture. For example, only those employees who fully ‘buy in’ to
Sigma Six qualify for senior positions in the organization. Thus far, the initiative has
yielded better than $4 billion in savings.

With the emergence of the Internet as a collaborative platform, GE now employs a new
set of tools in pursuit of ultra-high quality and speed. Lonnie Edelheit, a senior
technology and research advisor to GE, points to a number of Internet based collaborative
efforts the company now employs, including e-engineering and customer configuration.

Historically, GE operated with basic engineering tools, and relied on “intuition” to
predict customer demands. Its internal and external co-engineering efforts were highly
inefficient. Ram Matta, a senior GE research engineer, recounts a recent project where his
team was building jet engine wheel disks. At multiple stages of the project, an actual 10
ton wheel was shipped around the globe as engineers worked on interacting parts. Other
engineering activities were put on hold until the wheel was returned. According to Matta,
“it added 12 months to my cycle time and left me hostage to one supplier.”

27
     A German term referring to the malicious enjoyment of another’s misfortune.


10
Utilizing an Internet based e-engineering backbone, GE now ‘ships’ knowledge and
information, not physical prototypes, to its global engineering teams. Information, from
precision design specs to extensive test data, is deployed to the right people at the right
time. In the process, the e-engineering platform administers a complex system of work
and information flows, approvals, change management and multi-layered data access to
ensure product quality. Matta expects it will reduce cycle times from years to months.

GE also deploys mission critical information to customers (and dealers) via the Internet.
Each of GE’s manufacturing businesses offers ‘wizard’ software tools to facilitate
intelligent product configuration. For example, customers can select product types and
colors, receive cost estimates, and view digital representations of custom-made products
on line. GE captures these customer preferences digitally and in real time.

Doing so required that much tacit organizational knowledge, including important design
and business rules, be captured and embedded in the software. According to Joe Hogan,
vice president of e-business, GE Medical Systems, “Some of these pieces of equipment
can be pretty complicated. That information used to be in a person’s head, and the only
way you could get it was to make a phone call or send a fax, and someone would take a
look at it and suggest what the configuration should be.”28 Both GE and its customers
benefit from reduced sales cycles and better product matches.

General Electric considers its size and diversity of business activities a tremendous
strength. Adopting best practices from other business units or outside the company is
encouraged—competitive intelligence-gathering is required of all managers. Internally,
executives consider GE to be a “boundaryless” organization. A commitment to
collaborating with suppliers and customers is nothing new. In 1993, Welch wrote in a
letter to shareholders: “We involve suppliers as participants in our design and
manufacturing processes rather than treat them as vendors, left to cool their heels in
waiting rooms. It means having major launch customers like British Airways, Tokyo
Electric Power, or CSX in the room and involved in the design of a new jet engine, a
revolutionary gas turbine, or a new AC locomotive, or a panel of doctors helping us
develop a new ultrasound system.”29

By 2001, this collaboration was fortified by effective use of collaborative Internet
applications. GE targeted conventional workflow pitfalls, like data hoarding, information
bottlenecks, rework, and long cycle times, for improvement using the Internet.

As a key part of the solution, GE has mandated the use of Matrix One collaboration
software, eMatrix, for all new product introductions. Consider the case of GE Appliances.
This division launched a program to enable the participation of Indian suppliers very
early in the design process. Using eMatrix, India based companies Tata and Satyem co-
design new products with GE engineers located in Kentucky. Workflows, approvals, and
information access levels are managed over the Internet. Design cycle times and costs are
slashed. Moreover, intense collaboration with suppliers results in better manufacturing
cost models, and ultimately higher margins.
28
     “GE’s E-Biz Turnaround Proves that Big Is Back,” InternetWeek, date?
29
     Robert Slater, Jack Welch and the GE Way (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999), p. 131.


11
The GE Power Systems group realized $40-60 million in yearly savings after migrating
product and service data to the Internet. It has built powerful Web portals, integrating
more than 50 disparate legacy systems, to service its large power plant customers. Linked
to real time performance data from a global install base of power generation equipment,
GE is better positioned to offer higher value proactive services to customers.

Within the GE Industrial Systems business unit, technology enables deep relationships
with customers. Product engineering is highly collaborative, which strengthens
relationships between the company and its clients and increases the customers’ cost of
switching suppliers. According to Chris Fuselier, general manager of technology, GE
Industrial Systems, “[Collaboration] gets us a lot closer to our customers. They’re going
to be more involved, more frequently. We’ll be much better able to meet their needs, and
we think it will result in great customer loyalty.” 30

Co-engineering is common practice within GE’s Aircraft Engines business, where
supplier engineers have full access to data and participate in system design. The engine
test data system is moving off an IBM mainframe and onto an Internet platform. The data
is reliably and securely stored in an organized fashion and is available to both GE and
Boeing engineers.

Enabling Technology
Figure 3 illustrates the three main branches of GE’s collaborative activity. For each of
sell side, buy side, and make side, the main activities and supporting technologies are
shown. Note that the same players and technologies often operate in multiple branches.
MatrixOne is present in all three segments, as it serve as a universal integrator of various
technologies. For example, Web City, an internal collaboration system, helps to manage
projects and creates virtual folders that allow GE industrial systems to capture best
practices and expedite repetitive tasks. Also, Web Methods software works with eMatrix
to enable GE Power system’s transformation from legacy systems to Web technology.




30
     David Drucker, op. cit.


12
FIGURE B – COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES & SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGIES



                                                                      SELL SIDE
                                                                   COLLABORATION
                                    Dynamic price discovery
                                    Customer satisfaction metrics               MatrixOne
                                    Customer experience optimization            Part Edge
                                    Product customization                       Commerce One
                                    Co-engineering                              GE Global VMR
                                    Supply chain optimization                   Span




                                                                                                            MatrixOne
              Dynamic price discover                                                                        i Center
              Product customization                                                                         Microsoft Exchange
              Co-engineering                         E  N                             CO M                  Lotus (Notes, Domino, Raven)
                                                   ID IO
              Supply chain optimization         Y S AT                                  LL AKE
                                            BU BOR                                        AB S
                                               A                                            OR IDE
                                             LL                                                AT
                                          CO                                                      IO
                                                        MatrixOne                                    N
                                                        Web City
                                                        Commerce One
                                                        GE Global VMR
                                                                                          Workflow plan
                                                                                          Quality control
                                                                                          Documentation
                                                                                          Co-engineering
                                                                                          Testing results
              LEGEND
      COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES
      ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
                                                                                                                    Source – Digital 4Sight Research




GE has also increased collaboration in supply chain management. In October 2000, GE
Operations Services implemented GE Global VMI (vendor managed inventory), a
collaborative supply chain software product that supports inventory management,
forecasting, and logistics. According to Steve Pittman, General Manager, GE Operations
Services, “excessive inventories are often the hidden costs associated with inefficient
supply chain management. The GE Global VMI service allows for supply chain
monitoring and control 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Its inventory management
system can deliver up to a 50% inventory reduction of returned orders, leading to a 5:1
return on investment. This opens up new opportunities in supply chain efficiency for
suppliers and customers.”31 The results of this initiative, however, go beyond increased
efficiency and actually make the relationship between GE and its customers more
synergistic. Improved communication and transparency increase responsiveness and
reduce inventory costs. Products can change rapidly to adapt to market conditions and
inventory obsolescence is reduced or eliminated.

Measures of Success
GE’s commitment to e-commerce and intelligent collaborative commerce has been
unqualified. Although a great deal of work remains to be done to meet Welch’s
aggressive goals, the company has seen some promising early results (Figure 4).
These include baseline cost improvements resulting from transactional efficiency, to
higher order collaborative benefits such as shorter product development cycles.


31
     “GE Launches Collaborative Supply Chain System,” Quality Today, October 26, 2000.


13
Buy-side ICC                More than $15 billion worth of commodity products were bought
                      online in 2000. According to senior vice president and chief information
                      officer Gary Reiner, “if all of the [4 million per year] transactions went to
                      the Web, transactions costs would drop from an average of $75 each to as
                      low as $5 per transaction.”32
                            Internet transactions are already important, accounting for more than
                      $5 billion of GE’s $112 billion of worldwide revenue33
Sell-side ICC               Customer service costs decrease. For example, a customer call
                      answered by a phone operator costs $5; a Web interaction costs 20¢.
                      According to Reiner, “You’re talking about a more than 90% reduction in
                      costs. [In fleet services] telephone order inaccuracies run at about 45%. The
                      same transactions done over the Web, with software that helps get and give
                      the right information, drives down the error rate to one tenth of one
                      percent.”34
                            The use of eMatrix within GE Power Systems alone will result in
                      yearly savings of $40-60 million
Make-side ICC               Administrative costs decrease. GE management believes that through
                      Internet-enabled cross-functional collaboration the company can save from
                      20% to 50% of selling, general, and administrative expenses. This saving
                      would increase operating profits by almost 50%. 35
                            Innovation cycles decrease. Web City has cut 30-40% out of
                      innovation cycle times; more is expected when suppliers are fully
                      integrated.36
                            Using predictive modeling, GE reduced the time needed to make a
                      product modification for Seagate from over 100 weeks to 42 weeks. With
                      full ICC, this time should be further reduced to 8 weeks.
Infrastructure              Global Exchange handles $1 billion transactions per year (2000)
development           totaling $1 trillion in volume.37

                                          Figure 4
Future Vision
When Jack Welch was asked to imagine GE in 2020, he replied, “I hope it will be the
greatest learning institution in the world. I hope it will always look outside. I want it to
have curiosity.”38 The fact that Welch endorsed Jeffrey Immelt, the head of GE’s
medical-systems business, as his successor makes a lot of sense—Immelt’s career at GE
has been exclusively within business units that depend on high-tech engineering and that
are most likely to benefit from successful ICC deployment.


32
   Howard Rudnitsky, op. cit.
33
   Ibid.
34
   Ibid.
35
   Ibid.
36
   David Drucker, op. cit.
37
   “GE’s E-Biz Turnaround Proves that Big Is Back,” op. cit.
38
   Robert Slater, op. cit.


14
The next step is to utilize advanced tools—Web collaboration, digital prototyping,
advanced systems engineering—to completely transform the way GE interacts with
customers: “GE and the customer are seamless partners in the design process, like a
strand of DNA.” says Edelheit (See Figure 5). His main goal for GE is to expand the
innovation process beyond the boundary of the organization. Figure E illustrates the
evolution to true customer collaboration.

                                  Historical               Present                  Future
Tools                        Basic engineering       DFSS 39and predictive    Web collaboration
                             tools                   models                   Digital prototyping
                             Iterative guesswork                              Global resources
Outcome                      Hard to satisfy wants   Identify/meet CTQs40     Delighting the
                                                                              customer
Development Time             Years                   Months                   Customized products
                                                                              within weeks

Source: Lonnie Edelheit, Senior Technology and Research Advisor, General Electric
                                               Figure 5

The GE corporate R&D team plans to enrich its collaborative activities through deeper
use of technology such as eMatrix. Ram Matta believes that when GE achieves his vision,
it will leverage digital design and optimization to reduce manufacturing costs by a factor
of two.




39
     Design for Six Sigma.
40
     Critical to quality.


15
ON Semiconductor
         “Our knowledge management and its integration within our business process
        will be a significant differentiator for our company. We have customers and we
        have partners that say we are far ahead in this area of understanding, in terms
                  of driving the knowledge management side of our business.”1

                  Colum O’Neill, director of e-business, ON Semiconductor

One of the world’s leading suppliers of performance chips for power management in
electronic systems, ON Semiconductor is an employer of 14,000 worldwide. ON
separated from Motorola in 1998 and went public within a year. In 1999, its annual
revenues reached $1.6 billion.

ON Semiconductor’s products include integrated circuits for high-bandwidth data
applications, analog integrated circuits for power management, and low-voltage power
transistors. Though relatively inexpensive, semi conductors are a key driver of
technology in the new economy. ON collaborates with leading edge customers such as
Lucent, Cisco, Ericcson, and Nortel on a variety of products, including portable
electronic devices, networking equipment, and high-speed modems. Its participation in
pioneering ventures such as RosettaNet has made it a leader of product collaboration
within the semiconductor industry.


Business Context

ON operates in a crowded market, with many of its competitors producing similar – if not
identical products. In this intensely competitive industry, differentiation is critical to
success. Many of ON’s competitors compete on shipping, price, delivery, and service,
and margins in this business are becoming tougher and tougher to sustain.

ON ships approximately 22 billion units per year at an average price of 7.5¢ per unit.
60% of its revenue – approximately $1 billion, is generated from what it considers
commodity products. ON also designs customized solutions, developed collaboratively
with its customers. Due largely to a doubled R&D budget, ON also doubled its new
product introductions from 200 in 1998 to 400 in 1999. Integrating its business processes
and enabling greater product collaboration with customers are key elements of ON’s
strategy for dominating emerging product segments.

ON’s customers operate in fast-paced industries with extremely short product lifecycles.
Some of their products (cell phones and computers, for example) may have only 6-9
months of shelf life before becoming obsolete. Short product lifecycles are sustained
through rapid product development. ON’s OEM customers face relentless pressure to
come to market faster with products that have considerable advantages over existing
ones, and/or to target new customer segments. Product engineers are challenged to
innovate at an accelerated pace. ON’s peer suppliers must match their pace. Intense,



16
intelligent collaboration, from the conception of new components through their
manufacturing and delivery, is the key to speed.

 “There has always been collaboration in this industry, but up to this time it has been
paper-based and labor-intensive,”2 says Colum O’Neill, ON’s director of e-business. The
evolution of the Internet as a collaborative platform, and the emergence of powerful
enabling applications are driving the widespread adoption of digital collaboration.

ON is turning to Internet technologies to create efficiencies. According to Jim Thorburn,
ON’s COO, “Shifts in our business model are customer-driven, and to remain
competitive, we must change the way we interact with its customers.”3 Integration with
key customer business processes, information sharing, and new technical platforms are
driving ON’s e-commerce activities. Changing customer relationships are driving internal
change as well, affecting processes, people, and technology, and their interactions with
one another.

ON is strategically repositioning itself from efficient manufacturer to a collaborative
innovation driver, to meet the competitive challenges of its industry. The goal is to lead
the industry in anticipating the customer needs, and to build the infrastructure to deliver
against them.

Challenges and Opportunities

ON’s business partners—customers, suppliers, and employees—need information: the
right information at the right time. Information-driven interaction with its customers is
an ongoing challenge; the collaborative infrastructure necessary to compete in emerging
segments is more complex than ever before.

According to Thorburn, ON needs to improve its understanding of three key elements of
its business: how ON builds its products; how ON sells its products and how customers
use these products. ON is transitioning its perspective on business practices, from having
been primarily internally focused, to becoming shared externally.

                           Traditional                                            New



                                               Use

                                                                                                Use
                                                                                        Build
                                                                Process
                                        Sell
      Process

                                Build                                      Sell

                       Design
                                                                          Design



                                Time                 Figure 6                      Time


17
Figure 6 illustrates both the traditional and new approaches to sequencing the “design,”
“build,” and “sell” phases. The new model enables greater interaction, earlier, while
further integrating the design and sell phases. Customers become more active in the
product development cycle through collaborative product design, resulting in better,
higher value relationships. To build these new relationships with its customers and to
promote efficient collaboration, ON is working to develop seamless internal processes
and knowledge management solutions.

Although ON is a “new” company, it operates on legacy systems inherited from
Motorola. While these systems are adequate, they lack the functionality for more
complex workflow planning, information deployment and process integration, according
to Rebecca Glenn, CIO4. Access to accurate, real-time data, which legacy systems can’t
easily accommodate, is essential to doing business internally.

As ON strives to become more collaborative, system inflexibility becomes more than just
an internal obstacle. ON must be able to effectively ‘plug’ its business processes into
those of customers, and ensure the integrity of data exchanged. Consider the implications
for collaborative product development, a key element of ON’s strategy, where several
hundred people from various organizations might access product information through
design to manufacturing. Inaccurate, incomplete or out-of-date information has wide
reaching, negative effects.

In addition to structuring activities and disseminating information, business systems
contribute greatly to the culture of an organization. ON’s evolution from manufacturing
supplier to value added collaborator requires a new set of cultural norms around
information transparency and sharing, inter firm co-operation and decentralized decision
making. ON’s emerging Internet based business systems are built around these norms,
and are helping enact cultural change through the organization.


ICC Deployment
One of ON’s early e-business initiatives was to develop a Web presence with functional
linkages back to business processes. Though small, this initial step has unleashed a
multitude of future opportunities. “We did not want to build a façade, we wanted to
ensure that our Web site had product information that was linked back to our business,”5
states Colum O’Neill.

The dissemination of product information to customers is a core collaborative function
that has been migrated to the Web. Don Lambert, ON’s product information manager,
indicates that 700,000 documents are downloaded from its Web site, and half a million
product summary pages accessed, every month. These documents are linked directly to
internal product information management systems (PIMs), rather than managed as a
separate catalogue function, which preserves ON resources, and more importantly
ensures that the information is correct and up to date.




18
ON will ultimately render all relevant business information accessible, via the Internet, to
all its b-web partners. By deploying a new set of capabilities and porting to the Internet,
static data will form the input to more dynamic, rich information. (Figure 7)



                        Static                            Dynamic

                     Changes                            Changes
                   Infrequently                        Frequently

                                                        Reported
                    Managed
                                                       & Analyzed
                  Manufacturing                         Result of
                   Processes                            Processes


                                      Figure 7


Clearly, there are implications to such information transparency: “Before we can begin to
share our data with our suppliers or customers, we must ensure that the data is correct,
that it is able to flow through our organization, and that it is the data our customers are
looking for,”5 says O’Neill. To this end, ON is developing a single data model to capture
information and codify complex information relationships between business processes.
The single data model ensures that whenever information is accessed, it is the best and
latest available.

Moreover, where information is modified, changes must instantly be deployed wherever
they are relevant. “Dynamic documents must be integrated back to the business or there
will be misinformation floating around your customers’ organizations,”6 in Lambert’s
words. This implies the need for a seamless, secure network capable of pushing
information into multiple functional contexts. The same network must also be capable of
enforcing multiple business rules – from information access control to dynamic pricing
schedules. When ON’s engineers alter a design parameter, for example, the change must
instantly be reflected in ON’s manufacturing and ERP systems, as well as its CRM and
PIM systems. If the change is mission critical to a customer, then it must instantly flow
through to its planning and production systems. These data exchanges are the foundation
of efficient collaboration.

Utilizing Matrix One’s Web-based software eMatrix, ON was able to build this single
data model, or what Colum O’Neill refers to as the “hub middleware.” This layer of
architecture allows ON’s processes and content to flow through to its customer-facing
applications. Key customer information is gathered through the same hub. The single
source of information is the “engine” that feeds ON’s customer-facing applications such
as its product catalogue on the Web site and B2B market involvement.




19
According to O’Neill, “ON has only just begun.” The company will continue to offer
customers new collaborative, Internet based-services with real-time functionality and
links back to business processes. One example involves product numbers. ON currently
assigns every product an internal product number. Customers, after purchasing ON
components, assign their own numbers, creating certain inefficiencies when product
engineers re-order parts. ON maintains a separate cross-reference database so customers
can re-order components using their own numbers, but the system is imperfect. The
database lacks true process linkages.

In the next six months, ON will migrate this database into the eMatrix environment and,
through embedded business rules, fully automate the product number translation process.
Both ON and its customers benefit from new efficiencies. The creation of seamless
business process intersections supports ON’s mission to become the easiest company to
do business with in the industry.

There are also plans to improve linkages between product information systems and its
Siebel Systems CRM applications that aid the sales process. Ultimately, the systems will
be capable of automatically ‘recognizing’ customers and making intelligent
recommendations regarding product compatibility, business decisions and design. The
system will rely heavily on design and business logic embedded in software. For
example, ON could recognize an incompatibility between a low-voltage transistor and a
power management chip in a customer design and suggest an alternative. Or, it might
suggest an entirely different chip configuration to improve performance or lower costs.
There are also plans to make the system ‘smart’ enough to recommend ON’s components
over those of competitors, based on functionality or price advantages.

ON also collaborates with customers via RosettaNet, an industry initiative dedicated to
the development and deployment of standard e-commerce interfaces to align the
processes of global supply chain partners. As O’Neill explains, “RosettaNet is true
collaboration that leads to efficiencies.”11 Through RosettaNet, Lucent product engineers
conduct complex, cross-vendor parametric searches from their own operating
environments. ON is the first semiconductor company to participate in this venture. The
collaboration offers both cost and revenue benefits for ON and Lucent; the integration of
processes and the sharing of information allow the two organizations to communicate and
collaborate in real-time.

Measures of Success
ON is committed to measuring the results of its collaborative efforts, to ensure a healthy
return on investment. Early results from performance scorecards, used to monitor the
progress of key metrics over the last 6 months (March-December 2000), indicate that
improvements are being made.

The company set aggressive targets for percentage of their product portfolio available to
designers via the Internet, and are on their way to meeting them. The number of
customers requesting product samples online, for example, has increased ten-fold. ON
has also instituted an effective email notification program to inform customers of new


20
products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative
strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has
decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders.

ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond
quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and
expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase
in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now
have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project)
and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond
RosettaNet.

Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote
collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new
patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the
new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers.

Future Vision
Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will
be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON
will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This
will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON
employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product
development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy

Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its
ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow
for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the
business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and
collaboration across the value chain.




21
products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative
strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has
decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders.

ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond
quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and
expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase
in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now
have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project)
and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond
RosettaNet.

Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote
collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new
patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the
new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers.

Future Vision
Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will
be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON
will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This
will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON
employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product
development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy

Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its
ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow
for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the
business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and
collaboration across the value chain.




21
products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative
strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has
decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders.

ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond
quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and
expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase
in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now
have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project)
and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond
RosettaNet.

Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote
collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new
patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the
new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers.

Future Vision
Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will
be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON
will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This
will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON
employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product
development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy

Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its
ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow
for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the
business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and
collaboration across the value chain.




21

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Chp11 Business Intelligence
Chp11 Business IntelligenceChp11 Business Intelligence
Chp11 Business IntelligenceChuong Nguyen
 
E-Commerce Systems (I)
E-Commerce Systems (I)E-Commerce Systems (I)
E-Commerce Systems (I)Ray Wei
 
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...RedPrairie
 
Presentation to uci
Presentation to uciPresentation to uci
Presentation to uciArvind Sathi
 
Example Whitepaper
Example WhitepaperExample Whitepaper
Example Whitepapercsheppar
 
Implementing Advanced Analytics Platform
Implementing Advanced Analytics PlatformImplementing Advanced Analytics Platform
Implementing Advanced Analytics PlatformArvind Sathi
 
Customer relationship management and supply chain management
Customer relationship management and supply chain managementCustomer relationship management and supply chain management
Customer relationship management and supply chain managementRohit Kumar
 
Supply Chain Enterprise Resources Planning
Supply Chain  Enterprise Resources PlanningSupply Chain  Enterprise Resources Planning
Supply Chain Enterprise Resources Planningahmad bassiouny
 
eonRix Business Financials and Crm
eonRix Business Financials and CrmeonRix Business Financials and Crm
eonRix Business Financials and Crmekaterini
 
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+Datasheet
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+DatasheetIBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+Datasheet
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+DatasheetChris Martiniak
 
Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain Management
Supply Chain Managementuksuman9889
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Chp02 Trends
Chp02 TrendsChp02 Trends
Chp02 Trends
 
Chp11 Business Intelligence
Chp11 Business IntelligenceChp11 Business Intelligence
Chp11 Business Intelligence
 
UVW12360USEN
UVW12360USENUVW12360USEN
UVW12360USEN
 
SCM AND CRM
SCM AND CRMSCM AND CRM
SCM AND CRM
 
E-Commerce Systems (I)
E-Commerce Systems (I)E-Commerce Systems (I)
E-Commerce Systems (I)
 
Chapter8
Chapter8Chapter8
Chapter8
 
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...
Stores Under Siege: Balancing Sales, Service and Execution in an All-Channel ...
 
Chp06 Crm
Chp06 CrmChp06 Crm
Chp06 Crm
 
Presentation to uci
Presentation to uciPresentation to uci
Presentation to uci
 
Example Whitepaper
Example WhitepaperExample Whitepaper
Example Whitepaper
 
Chp07 Se Cm
Chp07 Se CmChp07 Se Cm
Chp07 Se Cm
 
Consumer goods
Consumer goodsConsumer goods
Consumer goods
 
Business Financials & CRM (English)
Business Financials & CRM (English)Business Financials & CRM (English)
Business Financials & CRM (English)
 
Implementing Advanced Analytics Platform
Implementing Advanced Analytics PlatformImplementing Advanced Analytics Platform
Implementing Advanced Analytics Platform
 
Customer relationship management and supply chain management
Customer relationship management and supply chain managementCustomer relationship management and supply chain management
Customer relationship management and supply chain management
 
Supply Chain Enterprise Resources Planning
Supply Chain  Enterprise Resources PlanningSupply Chain  Enterprise Resources Planning
Supply Chain Enterprise Resources Planning
 
eonRix Business Financials and Crm
eonRix Business Financials and CrmeonRix Business Financials and Crm
eonRix Business Financials and Crm
 
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+Datasheet
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+DatasheetIBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+Datasheet
IBM+Coremetrics+Web+Analytics+Datasheet
 
Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain Management
Supply Chain Management
 
Scm and crm
Scm and crmScm and crm
Scm and crm
 

Similar a Icc whitepaper

Mdr cloud 040611_v4_final
Mdr cloud 040611_v4_finalMdr cloud 040611_v4_final
Mdr cloud 040611_v4_finalMauricio Godoy
 
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...Farid Djaouani
 
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B Solutions
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B SolutionsHCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B Solutions
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B SolutionsHCLSoftware
 
Creatingbreakthrough
CreatingbreakthroughCreatingbreakthrough
Creatingbreakthroughterryyehster
 
IBM Smarter Process
IBM Smarter ProcessIBM Smarter Process
IBM Smarter ProcessProlifics
 
White Paper: DIY vs CIAM
White Paper: DIY vs CIAMWhite Paper: DIY vs CIAM
White Paper: DIY vs CIAMGigya
 
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep Dive
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep DiveMIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep Dive
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep DiveBrad Tornberg
 
All you need to know about banking by IBM
All you need to know about banking by IBMAll you need to know about banking by IBM
All you need to know about banking by IBMSofia Cherradi
 
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industries
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industriesThe trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industries
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industriesChristine Canet
 
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner Integration
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner IntegrationIBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner Integration
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner IntegrationLightwell
 
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology Trends
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology TrendsIBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology Trends
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology TrendsTero Angeria
 

Similar a Icc whitepaper (20)

LEAN ENTERPRISE
LEAN ENTERPRISELEAN ENTERPRISE
LEAN ENTERPRISE
 
Press releases
Press releasesPress releases
Press releases
 
Mdr cloud 040611_v4_final
Mdr cloud 040611_v4_finalMdr cloud 040611_v4_final
Mdr cloud 040611_v4_final
 
IBM Use Case for SugarCRM
IBM Use Case for SugarCRMIBM Use Case for SugarCRM
IBM Use Case for SugarCRM
 
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Connected Manufacturing Brochure
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Connected Manufacturing Brochure Hewlett Packard Enterprise Connected Manufacturing Brochure
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Connected Manufacturing Brochure
 
Microsoft Monopoly
Microsoft MonopolyMicrosoft Monopoly
Microsoft Monopoly
 
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...
IBM Private Digital Commerce (former Online Commerce): conductins business on...
 
IBM Digital Commerce
IBM Digital CommerceIBM Digital Commerce
IBM Digital Commerce
 
Winning
WinningWinning
Winning
 
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B Solutions
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B SolutionsHCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B Solutions
HCL Commerce Cloud: Elevate Sales with Integrated B2B Solutions
 
Creatingbreakthrough
CreatingbreakthroughCreatingbreakthrough
Creatingbreakthrough
 
IBM Smarter Process
IBM Smarter ProcessIBM Smarter Process
IBM Smarter Process
 
White Paper: DIY vs CIAM
White Paper: DIY vs CIAMWhite Paper: DIY vs CIAM
White Paper: DIY vs CIAM
 
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep Dive
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep DiveMIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep Dive
MIcrosoft Dynamics CRM 2013 - Deep Dive
 
All you need to know about banking by IBM
All you need to know about banking by IBMAll you need to know about banking by IBM
All you need to know about banking by IBM
 
vFS3 Exhibitor Directory
vFS3 Exhibitor DirectoryvFS3 Exhibitor Directory
vFS3 Exhibitor Directory
 
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industries
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industriesThe trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industries
The trillion-dollar-question-for-advanced-industries
 
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner Integration
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner IntegrationIBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner Integration
IBM Comprehensive Business-to-Partner Integration
 
Software Pricing
Software PricingSoftware Pricing
Software Pricing
 
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology Trends
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology TrendsIBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology Trends
IBM Guide to Consumer Products Industry Technology Trends
 

Último

PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story points
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story pointsData skills for Agile Teams- Killing story points
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story pointsyasinnathani
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGlokeshwarmaha
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...IMARC Group
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toumarfarooquejamali32
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Winbusinessin
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsWristbands Ireland
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Onlinelng ths
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentationbaron83
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyHanna Klim
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 

Último (20)

PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
 
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story points
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story pointsData skills for Agile Teams- Killing story points
Data skills for Agile Teams- Killing story points
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
 

Icc whitepaper

  • 1. Herman Miller Herman Miller, Inc. (HM) is the second-largest office furniture manufacturer in the world by production volume and revenues. Historically, HM’s success and growth have been driven by design excellence (including the Aeron chair and the Eames lounge chair) and innovation (HM invented “systems furniture” or cubicles in 1968, revolutionizing office spaces worldwide). Products are manufactured and assembled for the large, medium, small, and home office (SOHO) markets from millions of products and product variations. Despite the fact that office furniture is considered “low tech,” the company has firmly embraced technology, the Net, and organizational flexibility in pursuit of further excellence. There is no doubt that HM is successful and revolutionary. Fiscal year 2000 revenues were $1.9 billion and the average five-year growth was 13.2% in an industry that grew at 7% over that same time period.1 HM’s 7% net profit is the highest in the industry. As of February 15, 2001, the company’s price/earnings ratio of 13.5 reflects success in the market given the industry average ratio of 10.02. In the first six months of fiscal 2001 (to December 2000), sales and orders grew in excess of 23% compared to industry growth of 8.8% and 7.0% for sales and orders respectively for the same period.3 Business Context The traditional custom furniture industry targets 100+ seat (employee) firms with elaborate office design needs. Many customers view office furniture as a strategic purchase that will increase productivity. Design and quality are the main buying criteria, with less emphasis on delivery time. By the mid 1990s this market segment was stagnant, and manufacturers were competing on price, turning what was previously a custom product into a commodity. Industry consolidation characterized the 1990s. At the start of the decade the industry had only one manufacturer with sales over $1 billion. By 2000, through acquisitions and organic growth, four companies clocked in over the $1.5 billion mark, with Steelcase (the largest) realizing over $3 billion in revenue.4 These larger companies, HM among them, invested heavily in manufacturing and inventory management software to further exploit economies of scale in custom manufacturing. HM also created a second supply chain called SQA (simple, quick, and affordable) where suppliers provide semi-finished products that are assembled by HM. Customers have less choice but products arrive much faster, in as little as 5-20 days. In 1999 and 2000 the market seesawed. According to the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association (BIFMA), the office furniture market shrunk in 1999 (-1%) but rebounded in 2000 (9%). The 2001 forecast is for a slowdown in growth to 5.6%. Market dynamics are also changing: “Much of the growth in the US economy is 1 Herman Miller 2000 annual report http://www.hermanmiller.com/us/pdfs/investors/00ar.PDF. 2 Hoovers http://www.hoovers.com/enterprise/landscape/6/0,3091,13676,00.html. 3 Hoovers, Herman Miller Feb 5 press release http://www.hermanmiller.com/us/index.bbk/10422. 4 1999 Herman Miller financial presentation, www.hermanmiller.com/investors/dlpresentations.html. 1
  • 2. occurring in small and medium-sized companies. Many Fortune 500 companies are downsizing and, as a result, are not requiring furniture for new employees.”5 The SOHO (small office home office) market segment has different product and service needs than larger customers, including more sensitivity to price and delivery time. HM’s SQA line was created to address these needs. BIFMA states that competitors are concentrating on cost control and production efficiency to keep prices down. Also, “differentiation…based on service is often the only way to distinguish oneself from competitors.”6 Herman Miller responded to these business conditions by focusing on three strategic goals: • Differentiate on superior customer service. HM focuses on providing the fastest, most accurate delivery in the industry. The on-time, accurate shipment rate is over 99%. The company’s 5-28 day delivery time leads the industry. 7 • Improve speed to market of new products. Drew Schramm (vice president, supply chain management) estimates that HM can bring new products to market 15%-20% faster than the competition.8 • Create new markets and increase the pace of innovation in the industry. For HM, creating a new market means one of two things: being first to attack a market segment like SOHO; or creating new systems that improve design efficiency. Challenges and Opportunities HM recognized that capitalizing on new opportunities, like the growing SOHO market, required new production and service skill-sets. To offer semi-customized office furniture systems faster and cheaper, HM needed to operate with more speed and agility. There were also clear implications for HM’s relationships with suppliers and dealers. Business processes—from supply and inventory management to ordering and design—had to be aligned and integrated with production in order to respond quickly and accurately to market demands. HM’s large, diverse supplier base presented an additional challenge. It involves over 600 suppliers (125 of them “prime”), ranging from enormous conglomerates to tiny “mom and pop” shops, each with different levels of technical sophistication, importance to HM operations, and financial strength. HM’s goal is to empower and collaborate with suppliers, so both parties realize greater value from the relationship. For example, HM wants suppliers to deliver higher value, semi-finished goods rather than commodities. 5 BIFMA industry analysis: http://www.bifma.org/stats/stats_over2.html. 6 BIFMA industry analysis: http://www.bifma.org/stats/stats_over2.html. 7 Mark Schurman, director of corporate communications, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave Cosgrave and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 22 January 2001. 8 Drew Schramm, vice president supply chain management, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave Cosgrave and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 22 January 2001. 2
  • 3. Gaining alignment with the dealer community (still responsible for 70% of HM’s sales) would also prove challenging. Though HM continues to view dealers as value-adding intermediaries, it acknowledges that the nature of their value is changing. By offering new integrated design, sales, and order management tools, HM helps dealers operate more effectively and focus on higher value customer relationship management and service activities. HM uses ICC to achieve speed to market and rapid innovation. Only by working more closely and collaboratively with suppliers and dealers can HM create and dominate new markets. Herman Miller was among the first in the industry to understand these changing relationship dynamics. Says Schramm; “Our competitors thought that we were just doing rapid delivery.”9 In reality, HM reinvented the entire supply chain. ICC Deployment Herman Miller’s ICC deployment strategies contribute to all three strategic goals shown in Figure 1 below. Technology and the Internet are used to deploy information intelligently and distribute decision-making. Strategic Goals Deployment Strategy Result Superior customer  Supplier decisions based on  Accurate orders service complete access to demand and shipped on time. inventory information  Total cost reduction  Lower prices to customers  Supplier rationalization  Improved quality and speed due to increased collaboration  Z-Axis visual design  Faster time-to-order collaboration  eZconnect customer Web  Easier to re-order sites Speed to market with  Collaborative product and  Faster design process new products process design  Commodity managers  Better information flow to all participants, better forecasting Creation of new  Collaborative product and  Faster design process. markets process design Easier to predict trends as input comes from multiple sources. Figure 1 9 Ibid. 3
  • 4. Buy side Herman Miller has gone beyond automating its supply re-order system; it lets suppliers actually manage component inventories. Information deployment empowers suppliers to make strategic decisions in response to changes in demand, resulting in lower inventory and production costs throughout the supply chain. Suppliers have access to real-time demand and production information through one of two Web-based information systems —Supply-Net and SIGN. According to Bill Bundy, vice president of operations, “all that a supplier needs to access demand and inventory data in real-time is a PC, a Web browser, and a password.”10 Suppliers can also check electronic invoices for accuracy, ensuring prompt payment and maintaining cash flow. HM even has an automated alert system to warn suppliers of discrepancies in invoices or orders. This saves both HM and the supplier wasted time and effort in chasing down problems. HM also collaborates closely with suppliers to reduce total component costs. By analyzing costs at any point in the supply chain, components and processes can be singled out and analyzed for cost reductions. This is very different from the traditional model where manufacturers simply impose price reductions on helpless suppliers. The joint decision-making based on technology-enabled open information provides an excellent case for intelligent collaborative commerce. Herman Miller enables further supply side agility by collaborating with a smaller number of suppliers to create deeper, more flexible relationships. The goal is to transform tactical, reliability-focused relationships into strategic relationships rooted in information transparency and trust. HM uses a “bucket system” to rate suppliers along quantitative and qualitative measures. Bucket one suppliers not only deliver over 99% accuracy but also share complete costing information and can adapt quickly to change. Bucket two, three, and four suppliers share fewer and fewer of these qualities. The criteria are strict: of HM’s 600+ suppliers, only two are in bucket one. Drew Schramm indicates that the company has at least one major supplier who provides critical parts but risks being replaced because of its policy of not sharing cost information. Royal Plastics, a bucket one supplier, accesses SIGN and Supply-Net via the Net to get orders, inventory, forecasting, and payment info. “It helps us plan and keep better track of information,”11 says Perry Franco, Royal’s HM relationship manager. Franco indicates that many manufacturers simply demand that suppliers reduce prices and lead times, whereas HM “puts the tools in place to make it happen.” The tools enable intelligent collaboration between HM and Royal to achieve mutually important goals of leaner production. Similarly, Pent Assemblies shared cost breakdowns of a plastic part (labor, material, transportation charges, overhead attributed, cycle time of machinery). HM and Pent then were able to target the cost of the plastic resin as the main variable for the entire cost of the part. Working together, the two companies came up with a solution that 10 Bill Bundy, vice president of operations, Herman Miller, interview by Natalie Klym, Digital 4Sight, 11 April 2000. 11 Perry Franco, Royal Plastics Inc., interview by Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 5 February 2001. 4
  • 5. saves $50,000 annually. Schramm believes that there are many processes that can provide similar (or greater) cost savings.12 Make side Collaborative design pushes design information to all relevant parties and solicits input from all simultaneously, thus reducing the cycle time and increasing product quality. This practice allows HM to gain competitive advantage by increasing the pace of innovation in the industry. The process can also be applied to manufacturing and sales process innovation. As Schramm says, “our…suppliers literally have engineers sitting in our new product development teams adding to the value of the product as it’s coming down the pike.”13 He estimates that this collaboration allows HM to bring high quality new products to market 15%-20% faster than the competition. Franco indicates that his company will sometimes get involved two years before a product launch. Royal Plastics can lower costs by designing parts that it knows are less labor-intensive. HM intends to automate the design process by implementing software that enables virtual collaboration, thus saving time and resources involved in physically co-locating participants. Challenges may come from some suppliers who prefer to pay to send engineers to HM to physically manipulate the product. “I am typically trying to get my engineers to [HM’s] site to reduce headaches further on [during production],” says Franco. “They like to touch and feel the product, understand how it is used and its purpose.”14 For HM to be successful at virtual collaboration, it will have to simulate product manipulation. At HM the commodity manager is responsible for collecting information on a particular commodity (plastics, wood, raw steel, steel products, etc.) and disseminating it throughout the supply chain. The objective is to improve product design and trend forecasting, both of which are necessary to increase speed to market and improve production quality. Sell side Herman Miller shortens the sales cycle by embedding business and design process rules into customer-facing technology. Shorter sales cycles increase dealer revenues without increasing resources, and enable the pursuit of new market opportunities. Z-Axis is a virtual room that allows dealers to collaborate with customers to design SQA systems in real time. According to Lee Eilers “[Z-Axis] allows a customer to make better decisions on a more timely basis so it can meet its targets.”15 The software intelligently displays only the SQA furniture that can be delivered within the specified period and automatically produces an accurate bill of materials. Traditionally, designing systems 12 Drew Schramm, vice president supply chain management, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 16 February 2001. 13 Drew Schramm, op. cit., 22 January 2001. 14 Perry Franco, op. cit. 15 Lee Eilers, (()), Herman Miller Inc., interview by Dave Cosgrave and Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 22 January 2001. 5
  • 6. with CAD (computer-aided design) is a long and arduous process, particularly where changes are required. It could take months to complete sales to large customers. The cost for sales to smaller customers was prohibitive. Z-Axis allows dealers to reduce the sell cycle to weeks or even days and pursue the previously unfeasible medium-sized office market. eZconnect is a Web-enabled tool HM created for large customers to re-order, or make changes to its order, online. Through eZconnect, dealers progress from a traditional transactional relationship with the customer to a permanent contextual relationship that keeps the dealer, and HM, permanently in the customer’s mind. It enhances the customer experience by intelligently displaying only the furniture systems ordered and embedding the order processing rules. eZconnect was originally intended as a way for HM to connect directly with customers, to increase speed and efficiency. Unfortunately it displaced dealers in the process. “Literally, the product had to be enhanced or scrapped,”16 says Lee Eilers, who is in charge of the product for HM. By collaborating with dealers (who felt they were being disintermediated) and customers (who weren’t knowledgeable enough to order directly), the tool was recast into its current form. Intelligent collaboration in technology redesign creates the ongoing learning process that will help HM to “increase the clockspeed of the industry.”17 Herman Miller’s technology is the glue that links all strategic goals. There is a very experimental culture around technology. “It’s not a bad thing if technology doesn’t work if we gain some intelligence about it”18 Drew Schramm says of the supply side software he has used. The team applies the learning from the implementation of technology, even failed technology, to be able to implement the next technology faster and more efficiently. This organizational learning extends to technology that is used by suppliers and customers. 16 Ibid. 17 Mark Schurman, op. cit. Clockspeed refers to the work of Dr. Charles Fine wherein he describes the pace of innovation in an industry. 18 Drew Schramm, op. cit. Which interview date? 6
  • 7. FIGURE 2 – COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES & SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGIES SELL SIDE COLLABORATION Focus on reduced time-to-order Z-Axis Fast-accurate delivery and installation eZconnect Collaborative design Oasis order entry system Supply chain optimization hmstore.com Flex supply chain SQA (simple quick affordable) Complete demand and supply chain inventory information E N ID IO CO M ERP (JD Edwards, Baan) Total cost reduction Y S AT L L AK I2 Rhythm Factory Planner Supplier rationalization BU BOR AB E S A OR IDE Manufacturing Execution System Collaborative design LL AT Supply chain optimization CO IO Menlo Logistics SIGN N Supply-Net Menlo Logistics Collaborative design Commodity managers Workflow planning LEGEND COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES Source – Digital 4Sight Research Figure 2 On the sell side, Z-Axis and Oasis Order Entry System provide the interface for dealer orders. Customers, on the other hand, enter purchase information directly on eZconnect or hmstore.com. The next generation of software will be completely Web-based and designed to maximize customer usability. On the buy side, HM and Menlo Logistics send information to suppliers via SIGN and Supply-Net. This information is critical in the decision-making processes of suppliers and they have input into any updates to the technology. The make-side software feeds SIGN and Supply-Net through enterprise software like manufacturing resource planners, execution systems, and ERP systems. The company currently uses two ERP systems but have plans to reduce it to one. HM creates a collaborative learning environment where programmers and users can share experiences and leverage the lessons learned over multiple technologies. Measures of Success Herman Miller’s reliability score (a measure of on-time and complete shipments) is a measure of ICC success. Everyone in the value chain understands that 100% reliability means that the ordering, production, and fulfillment processes are running effectively. This measure of effectiveness is complemented by measures of efficiency that are the result of collaborative processes. Efficiency is measured by the time it takes for new products to get to market or for changes in design to be implemented in production, and also includes cost reduction through better design and production methods. The company view is that effectiveness brings new customers, while efficiency improves the bottom 7
  • 8. line. HM’s high growth and industry leading 48.7% return on equity, 15.1% return on assets, and 36.7% return on invested capital all indicate success in effectiveness and efficiency. Herman Miller also values its ability to create new markets and its ability to innovate at any point in the value chain. To do so, HM relies on economic value-added19 (EVA) metrics to push information and authority to innovate or make decisions out to the most appropriate organizational level. Schramm’s technology team uses EVA to decide whether or not it should implement a new technology: “If my group says it wants to spend $25,000 on a new piece of software, and it’s going to be EVA positive, there isn’t a person that stops us, we just go out and do it.”20 Achievement of EVA targets also drives corporate bonuses, which creates further incentive to use it as a decision-making tool. A telling metric for evaluating how well HM is working with its suppliers is how many are in the bucket one category. As more suppliers progress into bucket one, HM will benefit from having better collaboration and opportunities to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Future Vision Herman Miller will face challenges in deploying its ICC strategy internationally. Face-to- face collaborations are more expensive, and HM must rely on embedded business and process rules in software to collaborate virtually and maintain effective distributed decision-making. Success will lead to furniture systems tailored to local tastes, rapid growth in market share, and continued flexibility. There may also be new cultural barriers to face around the principle of open information. The benefits of information sharing for total cost reduction and rapid innovation must be communicated and the bucket system expanded. The company also wants to gather and harness more customer knowledge to enhance the purchase experience and design of future systems. According to Mark Schurman, HM is “implementing collaborative, remote interactive technology in our design process that we believe will add speed and reliability to our new product commercialization process going forward, including a ‘virtual’ development lab.”21 To begin with, the company will create a “customer team” to solicit feedback from customers directly. Conversations will yield valuable information and be disseminated throughout the value chain. HM plans to reap information on preferences and dislikes directly from dealer software and Web tools. If a certain office layout is never chosen, it may need more focus. If, however, the layout is seen by many customers but never chosen then it can be eliminated. This level of unbiased detail is difficult to obtain from conversations and illustrates the importance of the ICC principle of capturing business information at the source of creation. 19 EVA is a measure designed to give companies a more accurate way of estimating real economic profit than traditional financial metrics. It calculates after-tax net operating profit for a given period, less the total cost of capital over the period. 20 Drew Schramm, op. cit. Which interview date? 21 Mark Schurman, Herman Miller Inc., interview by Terrence Hibbert, Digital 4Sight, 16 February 2001. 8
  • 9. General Electric “[Through the use of collaboration software, suppliers] will be working as if they’re part of our team. We think it will change the whole paradigm of how we work with suppliers.”22 Chris Fuselier, general manager of technology, GE Industrial Systems General Electric is an expansive global corporation whose offerings range from jet engines to financial services to the television show “Will and Grace.” Not only is the company in the Fortune 500 (it’s #5), but 13 of its business units are big enough to qualify individually. Business processes and markets vary widely from one business unit to another—consider the difference in innovation strategies between nuclear reactors and equipment leases. Despite its size and varied mix of offerings, General Electric eschews the sluggish behavior typical of a behemoth conglomerate. GE is an early adopter of innovative business practices: the company was quick to embrace Economic Value Added23 as a key business metric and passionately pursued Six Sigma excellence.24 During the 1980s, when most companies divested assets and outsourced down to core competencies, GE, under legendary CEO Jack Welch, constantly revamped its portfolio of businesses. Retaining only business units that could consistently be ranked #1 or #2 in their markets, the company sold $10 billion and purchased $19 billion worth of businesses. By 2000, the traditional manufacturing company that Thomas Edison started in 1878 was generating more than 60% of its revenue through services. This revenue is not just realized by prized assets like GE Capital and NBC, but also through after-sales service contracts on the company’s equipment business. Business Context Unlike many other global firms, GE did not react to dot-coms with panic or studied indifference, but instead saw them as a challenge and opportunity. Welch announced that the company’s e-commerce strategy would “change the DNA of GE forever by energizing and revitalizing every corner of this company.”25 Welch imparted a sense of urgency: “One cannot be tentative about this. Delay and you risk being cut out of your own market, perhaps not by traditional competitors but by companies you never heard of twenty-four months ago.”26 Simply adopting Internet technology and streamlining 22 David Drucker, “Virtual Teams Light Up GE,” Internet Week, April 6, 2000. 23 EVA is a measure designed to give companies a more accurate way of estimating real economic profit than traditional financial metrics. It calculates after-tax net operating profit for a given period, less the total cost of capital over the period. 24 Adapted from the 18th letter in the Greek alphabet, the term “sigma” is used in statistics as a measure of variation. Each sigma represents a standard deviation. Within a set of random data, one sigma means 68% of goods are acceptable and two sigma means 95% are acceptable. Six sigma means 99.999997% of goods are acceptable (or 3.4 defects per million). 25 Howard Rudnitsky, op. cit. 26 Ibid. 9
  • 10. operations will not generate a competitive advantage—all of GE’s competitors could do that. To succeed, GE needed to leverage Internet technology faster with more focus. Then, in the aftermath of the 2000 NASDAQ correction, many large companies let out a relieved sigh, engaged in a little schadenfreude27 at the expense of some former dot-com billionaires, and sent e-commerce to lower priority status. Not so General Electric. Welch promises that e-business will realize $10 billion in savings between 2000 and 2002. These savings will, in large part, result from GE’s aggressive adoption of collaborative practices across business units and with customers and suppliers. Challenges and Opportunities GE’s corporate mission is to completely transform the company through effective use of technology. Jack Welch set a clear direction that the entire company be digitized. In fact, the company now tracks the number of computer printers and fax machines “retired” for a given period, as proof that digitally captured data had replaced paper. This simple metric understates GE’s challenge. Going ‘digital’ means patching together numerous legacy systems, coordinating multiple data models and enabling more and better communication between them. GE’s overall corporate strategy has four components: continued globalization, further pursuit of Sigma Six quality, increased revenue from services, and the pursuit of e- business. Intelligent collaborative commerce, aided by corporate level investments in technology, supports each of these initiatives. ICC Deployment In only four years GE’s Sigma Six quality initiative, a relentless commitment to reducing production and performance errors to fewer than four per million, has become deeply ingrained in corporate culture. For example, only those employees who fully ‘buy in’ to Sigma Six qualify for senior positions in the organization. Thus far, the initiative has yielded better than $4 billion in savings. With the emergence of the Internet as a collaborative platform, GE now employs a new set of tools in pursuit of ultra-high quality and speed. Lonnie Edelheit, a senior technology and research advisor to GE, points to a number of Internet based collaborative efforts the company now employs, including e-engineering and customer configuration. Historically, GE operated with basic engineering tools, and relied on “intuition” to predict customer demands. Its internal and external co-engineering efforts were highly inefficient. Ram Matta, a senior GE research engineer, recounts a recent project where his team was building jet engine wheel disks. At multiple stages of the project, an actual 10 ton wheel was shipped around the globe as engineers worked on interacting parts. Other engineering activities were put on hold until the wheel was returned. According to Matta, “it added 12 months to my cycle time and left me hostage to one supplier.” 27 A German term referring to the malicious enjoyment of another’s misfortune. 10
  • 11. Utilizing an Internet based e-engineering backbone, GE now ‘ships’ knowledge and information, not physical prototypes, to its global engineering teams. Information, from precision design specs to extensive test data, is deployed to the right people at the right time. In the process, the e-engineering platform administers a complex system of work and information flows, approvals, change management and multi-layered data access to ensure product quality. Matta expects it will reduce cycle times from years to months. GE also deploys mission critical information to customers (and dealers) via the Internet. Each of GE’s manufacturing businesses offers ‘wizard’ software tools to facilitate intelligent product configuration. For example, customers can select product types and colors, receive cost estimates, and view digital representations of custom-made products on line. GE captures these customer preferences digitally and in real time. Doing so required that much tacit organizational knowledge, including important design and business rules, be captured and embedded in the software. According to Joe Hogan, vice president of e-business, GE Medical Systems, “Some of these pieces of equipment can be pretty complicated. That information used to be in a person’s head, and the only way you could get it was to make a phone call or send a fax, and someone would take a look at it and suggest what the configuration should be.”28 Both GE and its customers benefit from reduced sales cycles and better product matches. General Electric considers its size and diversity of business activities a tremendous strength. Adopting best practices from other business units or outside the company is encouraged—competitive intelligence-gathering is required of all managers. Internally, executives consider GE to be a “boundaryless” organization. A commitment to collaborating with suppliers and customers is nothing new. In 1993, Welch wrote in a letter to shareholders: “We involve suppliers as participants in our design and manufacturing processes rather than treat them as vendors, left to cool their heels in waiting rooms. It means having major launch customers like British Airways, Tokyo Electric Power, or CSX in the room and involved in the design of a new jet engine, a revolutionary gas turbine, or a new AC locomotive, or a panel of doctors helping us develop a new ultrasound system.”29 By 2001, this collaboration was fortified by effective use of collaborative Internet applications. GE targeted conventional workflow pitfalls, like data hoarding, information bottlenecks, rework, and long cycle times, for improvement using the Internet. As a key part of the solution, GE has mandated the use of Matrix One collaboration software, eMatrix, for all new product introductions. Consider the case of GE Appliances. This division launched a program to enable the participation of Indian suppliers very early in the design process. Using eMatrix, India based companies Tata and Satyem co- design new products with GE engineers located in Kentucky. Workflows, approvals, and information access levels are managed over the Internet. Design cycle times and costs are slashed. Moreover, intense collaboration with suppliers results in better manufacturing cost models, and ultimately higher margins. 28 “GE’s E-Biz Turnaround Proves that Big Is Back,” InternetWeek, date? 29 Robert Slater, Jack Welch and the GE Way (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999), p. 131. 11
  • 12. The GE Power Systems group realized $40-60 million in yearly savings after migrating product and service data to the Internet. It has built powerful Web portals, integrating more than 50 disparate legacy systems, to service its large power plant customers. Linked to real time performance data from a global install base of power generation equipment, GE is better positioned to offer higher value proactive services to customers. Within the GE Industrial Systems business unit, technology enables deep relationships with customers. Product engineering is highly collaborative, which strengthens relationships between the company and its clients and increases the customers’ cost of switching suppliers. According to Chris Fuselier, general manager of technology, GE Industrial Systems, “[Collaboration] gets us a lot closer to our customers. They’re going to be more involved, more frequently. We’ll be much better able to meet their needs, and we think it will result in great customer loyalty.” 30 Co-engineering is common practice within GE’s Aircraft Engines business, where supplier engineers have full access to data and participate in system design. The engine test data system is moving off an IBM mainframe and onto an Internet platform. The data is reliably and securely stored in an organized fashion and is available to both GE and Boeing engineers. Enabling Technology Figure 3 illustrates the three main branches of GE’s collaborative activity. For each of sell side, buy side, and make side, the main activities and supporting technologies are shown. Note that the same players and technologies often operate in multiple branches. MatrixOne is present in all three segments, as it serve as a universal integrator of various technologies. For example, Web City, an internal collaboration system, helps to manage projects and creates virtual folders that allow GE industrial systems to capture best practices and expedite repetitive tasks. Also, Web Methods software works with eMatrix to enable GE Power system’s transformation from legacy systems to Web technology. 30 David Drucker, op. cit. 12
  • 13. FIGURE B – COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES & SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGIES SELL SIDE COLLABORATION Dynamic price discovery Customer satisfaction metrics MatrixOne Customer experience optimization Part Edge Product customization Commerce One Co-engineering GE Global VMR Supply chain optimization Span MatrixOne Dynamic price discover i Center Product customization Microsoft Exchange Co-engineering E N CO M Lotus (Notes, Domino, Raven) ID IO Supply chain optimization Y S AT LL AKE BU BOR AB S A OR IDE LL AT CO IO MatrixOne N Web City Commerce One GE Global VMR Workflow plan Quality control Documentation Co-engineering Testing results LEGEND COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES Source – Digital 4Sight Research GE has also increased collaboration in supply chain management. In October 2000, GE Operations Services implemented GE Global VMI (vendor managed inventory), a collaborative supply chain software product that supports inventory management, forecasting, and logistics. According to Steve Pittman, General Manager, GE Operations Services, “excessive inventories are often the hidden costs associated with inefficient supply chain management. The GE Global VMI service allows for supply chain monitoring and control 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Its inventory management system can deliver up to a 50% inventory reduction of returned orders, leading to a 5:1 return on investment. This opens up new opportunities in supply chain efficiency for suppliers and customers.”31 The results of this initiative, however, go beyond increased efficiency and actually make the relationship between GE and its customers more synergistic. Improved communication and transparency increase responsiveness and reduce inventory costs. Products can change rapidly to adapt to market conditions and inventory obsolescence is reduced or eliminated. Measures of Success GE’s commitment to e-commerce and intelligent collaborative commerce has been unqualified. Although a great deal of work remains to be done to meet Welch’s aggressive goals, the company has seen some promising early results (Figure 4). These include baseline cost improvements resulting from transactional efficiency, to higher order collaborative benefits such as shorter product development cycles. 31 “GE Launches Collaborative Supply Chain System,” Quality Today, October 26, 2000. 13
  • 14. Buy-side ICC  More than $15 billion worth of commodity products were bought online in 2000. According to senior vice president and chief information officer Gary Reiner, “if all of the [4 million per year] transactions went to the Web, transactions costs would drop from an average of $75 each to as low as $5 per transaction.”32  Internet transactions are already important, accounting for more than $5 billion of GE’s $112 billion of worldwide revenue33 Sell-side ICC  Customer service costs decrease. For example, a customer call answered by a phone operator costs $5; a Web interaction costs 20¢. According to Reiner, “You’re talking about a more than 90% reduction in costs. [In fleet services] telephone order inaccuracies run at about 45%. The same transactions done over the Web, with software that helps get and give the right information, drives down the error rate to one tenth of one percent.”34  The use of eMatrix within GE Power Systems alone will result in yearly savings of $40-60 million Make-side ICC  Administrative costs decrease. GE management believes that through Internet-enabled cross-functional collaboration the company can save from 20% to 50% of selling, general, and administrative expenses. This saving would increase operating profits by almost 50%. 35  Innovation cycles decrease. Web City has cut 30-40% out of innovation cycle times; more is expected when suppliers are fully integrated.36  Using predictive modeling, GE reduced the time needed to make a product modification for Seagate from over 100 weeks to 42 weeks. With full ICC, this time should be further reduced to 8 weeks. Infrastructure  Global Exchange handles $1 billion transactions per year (2000) development totaling $1 trillion in volume.37 Figure 4 Future Vision When Jack Welch was asked to imagine GE in 2020, he replied, “I hope it will be the greatest learning institution in the world. I hope it will always look outside. I want it to have curiosity.”38 The fact that Welch endorsed Jeffrey Immelt, the head of GE’s medical-systems business, as his successor makes a lot of sense—Immelt’s career at GE has been exclusively within business units that depend on high-tech engineering and that are most likely to benefit from successful ICC deployment. 32 Howard Rudnitsky, op. cit. 33 Ibid. 34 Ibid. 35 Ibid. 36 David Drucker, op. cit. 37 “GE’s E-Biz Turnaround Proves that Big Is Back,” op. cit. 38 Robert Slater, op. cit. 14
  • 15. The next step is to utilize advanced tools—Web collaboration, digital prototyping, advanced systems engineering—to completely transform the way GE interacts with customers: “GE and the customer are seamless partners in the design process, like a strand of DNA.” says Edelheit (See Figure 5). His main goal for GE is to expand the innovation process beyond the boundary of the organization. Figure E illustrates the evolution to true customer collaboration. Historical Present Future Tools Basic engineering DFSS 39and predictive Web collaboration tools models Digital prototyping Iterative guesswork Global resources Outcome Hard to satisfy wants Identify/meet CTQs40 Delighting the customer Development Time Years Months Customized products within weeks Source: Lonnie Edelheit, Senior Technology and Research Advisor, General Electric Figure 5 The GE corporate R&D team plans to enrich its collaborative activities through deeper use of technology such as eMatrix. Ram Matta believes that when GE achieves his vision, it will leverage digital design and optimization to reduce manufacturing costs by a factor of two. 39 Design for Six Sigma. 40 Critical to quality. 15
  • 16. ON Semiconductor “Our knowledge management and its integration within our business process will be a significant differentiator for our company. We have customers and we have partners that say we are far ahead in this area of understanding, in terms of driving the knowledge management side of our business.”1 Colum O’Neill, director of e-business, ON Semiconductor One of the world’s leading suppliers of performance chips for power management in electronic systems, ON Semiconductor is an employer of 14,000 worldwide. ON separated from Motorola in 1998 and went public within a year. In 1999, its annual revenues reached $1.6 billion. ON Semiconductor’s products include integrated circuits for high-bandwidth data applications, analog integrated circuits for power management, and low-voltage power transistors. Though relatively inexpensive, semi conductors are a key driver of technology in the new economy. ON collaborates with leading edge customers such as Lucent, Cisco, Ericcson, and Nortel on a variety of products, including portable electronic devices, networking equipment, and high-speed modems. Its participation in pioneering ventures such as RosettaNet has made it a leader of product collaboration within the semiconductor industry. Business Context ON operates in a crowded market, with many of its competitors producing similar – if not identical products. In this intensely competitive industry, differentiation is critical to success. Many of ON’s competitors compete on shipping, price, delivery, and service, and margins in this business are becoming tougher and tougher to sustain. ON ships approximately 22 billion units per year at an average price of 7.5¢ per unit. 60% of its revenue – approximately $1 billion, is generated from what it considers commodity products. ON also designs customized solutions, developed collaboratively with its customers. Due largely to a doubled R&D budget, ON also doubled its new product introductions from 200 in 1998 to 400 in 1999. Integrating its business processes and enabling greater product collaboration with customers are key elements of ON’s strategy for dominating emerging product segments. ON’s customers operate in fast-paced industries with extremely short product lifecycles. Some of their products (cell phones and computers, for example) may have only 6-9 months of shelf life before becoming obsolete. Short product lifecycles are sustained through rapid product development. ON’s OEM customers face relentless pressure to come to market faster with products that have considerable advantages over existing ones, and/or to target new customer segments. Product engineers are challenged to innovate at an accelerated pace. ON’s peer suppliers must match their pace. Intense, 16
  • 17. intelligent collaboration, from the conception of new components through their manufacturing and delivery, is the key to speed. “There has always been collaboration in this industry, but up to this time it has been paper-based and labor-intensive,”2 says Colum O’Neill, ON’s director of e-business. The evolution of the Internet as a collaborative platform, and the emergence of powerful enabling applications are driving the widespread adoption of digital collaboration. ON is turning to Internet technologies to create efficiencies. According to Jim Thorburn, ON’s COO, “Shifts in our business model are customer-driven, and to remain competitive, we must change the way we interact with its customers.”3 Integration with key customer business processes, information sharing, and new technical platforms are driving ON’s e-commerce activities. Changing customer relationships are driving internal change as well, affecting processes, people, and technology, and their interactions with one another. ON is strategically repositioning itself from efficient manufacturer to a collaborative innovation driver, to meet the competitive challenges of its industry. The goal is to lead the industry in anticipating the customer needs, and to build the infrastructure to deliver against them. Challenges and Opportunities ON’s business partners—customers, suppliers, and employees—need information: the right information at the right time. Information-driven interaction with its customers is an ongoing challenge; the collaborative infrastructure necessary to compete in emerging segments is more complex than ever before. According to Thorburn, ON needs to improve its understanding of three key elements of its business: how ON builds its products; how ON sells its products and how customers use these products. ON is transitioning its perspective on business practices, from having been primarily internally focused, to becoming shared externally. Traditional New Use Use Build Process Sell Process Build Sell Design Design Time Figure 6 Time 17
  • 18. Figure 6 illustrates both the traditional and new approaches to sequencing the “design,” “build,” and “sell” phases. The new model enables greater interaction, earlier, while further integrating the design and sell phases. Customers become more active in the product development cycle through collaborative product design, resulting in better, higher value relationships. To build these new relationships with its customers and to promote efficient collaboration, ON is working to develop seamless internal processes and knowledge management solutions. Although ON is a “new” company, it operates on legacy systems inherited from Motorola. While these systems are adequate, they lack the functionality for more complex workflow planning, information deployment and process integration, according to Rebecca Glenn, CIO4. Access to accurate, real-time data, which legacy systems can’t easily accommodate, is essential to doing business internally. As ON strives to become more collaborative, system inflexibility becomes more than just an internal obstacle. ON must be able to effectively ‘plug’ its business processes into those of customers, and ensure the integrity of data exchanged. Consider the implications for collaborative product development, a key element of ON’s strategy, where several hundred people from various organizations might access product information through design to manufacturing. Inaccurate, incomplete or out-of-date information has wide reaching, negative effects. In addition to structuring activities and disseminating information, business systems contribute greatly to the culture of an organization. ON’s evolution from manufacturing supplier to value added collaborator requires a new set of cultural norms around information transparency and sharing, inter firm co-operation and decentralized decision making. ON’s emerging Internet based business systems are built around these norms, and are helping enact cultural change through the organization. ICC Deployment One of ON’s early e-business initiatives was to develop a Web presence with functional linkages back to business processes. Though small, this initial step has unleashed a multitude of future opportunities. “We did not want to build a façade, we wanted to ensure that our Web site had product information that was linked back to our business,”5 states Colum O’Neill. The dissemination of product information to customers is a core collaborative function that has been migrated to the Web. Don Lambert, ON’s product information manager, indicates that 700,000 documents are downloaded from its Web site, and half a million product summary pages accessed, every month. These documents are linked directly to internal product information management systems (PIMs), rather than managed as a separate catalogue function, which preserves ON resources, and more importantly ensures that the information is correct and up to date. 18
  • 19. ON will ultimately render all relevant business information accessible, via the Internet, to all its b-web partners. By deploying a new set of capabilities and porting to the Internet, static data will form the input to more dynamic, rich information. (Figure 7) Static Dynamic Changes Changes Infrequently Frequently Reported Managed & Analyzed Manufacturing Result of Processes Processes Figure 7 Clearly, there are implications to such information transparency: “Before we can begin to share our data with our suppliers or customers, we must ensure that the data is correct, that it is able to flow through our organization, and that it is the data our customers are looking for,”5 says O’Neill. To this end, ON is developing a single data model to capture information and codify complex information relationships between business processes. The single data model ensures that whenever information is accessed, it is the best and latest available. Moreover, where information is modified, changes must instantly be deployed wherever they are relevant. “Dynamic documents must be integrated back to the business or there will be misinformation floating around your customers’ organizations,”6 in Lambert’s words. This implies the need for a seamless, secure network capable of pushing information into multiple functional contexts. The same network must also be capable of enforcing multiple business rules – from information access control to dynamic pricing schedules. When ON’s engineers alter a design parameter, for example, the change must instantly be reflected in ON’s manufacturing and ERP systems, as well as its CRM and PIM systems. If the change is mission critical to a customer, then it must instantly flow through to its planning and production systems. These data exchanges are the foundation of efficient collaboration. Utilizing Matrix One’s Web-based software eMatrix, ON was able to build this single data model, or what Colum O’Neill refers to as the “hub middleware.” This layer of architecture allows ON’s processes and content to flow through to its customer-facing applications. Key customer information is gathered through the same hub. The single source of information is the “engine” that feeds ON’s customer-facing applications such as its product catalogue on the Web site and B2B market involvement. 19
  • 20. According to O’Neill, “ON has only just begun.” The company will continue to offer customers new collaborative, Internet based-services with real-time functionality and links back to business processes. One example involves product numbers. ON currently assigns every product an internal product number. Customers, after purchasing ON components, assign their own numbers, creating certain inefficiencies when product engineers re-order parts. ON maintains a separate cross-reference database so customers can re-order components using their own numbers, but the system is imperfect. The database lacks true process linkages. In the next six months, ON will migrate this database into the eMatrix environment and, through embedded business rules, fully automate the product number translation process. Both ON and its customers benefit from new efficiencies. The creation of seamless business process intersections supports ON’s mission to become the easiest company to do business with in the industry. There are also plans to improve linkages between product information systems and its Siebel Systems CRM applications that aid the sales process. Ultimately, the systems will be capable of automatically ‘recognizing’ customers and making intelligent recommendations regarding product compatibility, business decisions and design. The system will rely heavily on design and business logic embedded in software. For example, ON could recognize an incompatibility between a low-voltage transistor and a power management chip in a customer design and suggest an alternative. Or, it might suggest an entirely different chip configuration to improve performance or lower costs. There are also plans to make the system ‘smart’ enough to recommend ON’s components over those of competitors, based on functionality or price advantages. ON also collaborates with customers via RosettaNet, an industry initiative dedicated to the development and deployment of standard e-commerce interfaces to align the processes of global supply chain partners. As O’Neill explains, “RosettaNet is true collaboration that leads to efficiencies.”11 Through RosettaNet, Lucent product engineers conduct complex, cross-vendor parametric searches from their own operating environments. ON is the first semiconductor company to participate in this venture. The collaboration offers both cost and revenue benefits for ON and Lucent; the integration of processes and the sharing of information allow the two organizations to communicate and collaborate in real-time. Measures of Success ON is committed to measuring the results of its collaborative efforts, to ensure a healthy return on investment. Early results from performance scorecards, used to monitor the progress of key metrics over the last 6 months (March-December 2000), indicate that improvements are being made. The company set aggressive targets for percentage of their product portfolio available to designers via the Internet, and are on their way to meeting them. The number of customers requesting product samples online, for example, has increased ten-fold. ON has also instituted an effective email notification program to inform customers of new 20
  • 21. products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders. ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project) and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond RosettaNet. Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers. Future Vision Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and collaboration across the value chain. 21
  • 22. products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders. ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project) and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond RosettaNet. Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers. Future Vision Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and collaboration across the value chain. 21
  • 23. products. Indications are that that ON’s customers are finding value in their collaborative strategy. On time delivery has improved, delivery time of internet sample orders has decreased, and they now have more channels available to them for tracking orders. ON has also improved internal quoting mechanisms and hence its ability to respond quickly to market opportunities. The company both increased the number of quotes and expedited their delivery over the measurement period. There has been a dramatic increase in new orders being acknowledged internally within 24 hours. In addition, customers now have the option of receiving quotes through the telephone, or the internet (pilot project) and there are plans to expand this to include more B2B marketplaces (XML) beyond RosettaNet. Finally, ON has realigned compensation policy for product engineers, in order to promote collaboration. This new program includes bonuses for new projects won, as well as new patents registered. The intent of the program is to urge product developers to utilize the new tools and technology available to drive innovation and interaction with customers. Future Vision Moving fast and managing change are key to ON’s future. “Collaboration at its best will be measured by time to market,”12 states O’Neill. With a solid foundation in place, ON will continue to roll out applications that enable further integration with customers. This will culminate in the creation of a single, Internet based environment where ON employees and customers can easily and efficiently work together. Collaborative product development will continue to be the focus of ON’s strategy Collaborative forecasting will also come to the forefront as ON continues to develop its ICC strategy. Forecasting models, focused on the supply side of their business, will allow for more efficient production. To date, ON’s focus has been on the customer side of the business, though sustained advantage will come from promoting efficiency and collaboration across the value chain. 21