SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 35
Validation of Economic Capital Models: State of the Practice, Supervisory Expectations and Results from a Bank Study Michael Jacobs, Ph.D., CFA Senior Economist / Credit Risk Analysis Division U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Risk Conference on Economic Capital, February 2010 The views expressed herein are those of the authos and do not necessarily represent the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Department of the Treasury.
Outline ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction, Background and Motivation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction, Background and Motivation (continued) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fitness for Purpose of Economic Capital Models  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fitness for Purpose of EC Models (continued)  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Providing Confidence Regarding EC Model Assumptions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Providing Confidence Regarding EC Model Assumptions (cont.) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Validation of EC Models: Introduction to Range of Practice ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Validation of EC Models: Range of Practice in Qualitative Approaches ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Qualitative Approaches to Validation (continued) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Qualitative Approaches to Validation (concluded) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Approaches to Validation: Inputs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Model Replication ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Benchmarking ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Benchmarking (continued) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Backtesting ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Backtesting (continued) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Quantitative Validation: Stress Testing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Range of Practice in Validation: Additional Considerations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Technical Challenges in Assessing the Adequacy of an EC Model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
EC Model Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Risk Proxy Data Summary (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Distributions of Risk Proxies (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Correlations of Risk Proxies (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08) )
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Absolute EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Absolute EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Relative EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – % Diversification Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Goodness of Fit Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – EC Variability Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – EC Variability Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
 
Summary of Contributions and Major Findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Summary of Contributions and Major Findings (continued) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Testing throughout the software life cycle
Testing throughout the software life cycleTesting throughout the software life cycle
Testing throughout the software life cyclechayo rona
 
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritization
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements PrioritizationConceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritization
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritizationresearchinventy
 
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based Approach
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based ApproachPrioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based Approach
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based ApproachIJTET Journal
 
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )Calibration and validation model (Simulation )
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )Rajan Kandel
 
Gm assessing performance
Gm assessing performanceGm assessing performance
Gm assessing performanceSatya Harish
 
Testing 1 - the Basics
Testing 1 - the BasicsTesting 1 - the Basics
Testing 1 - the BasicsArleneAndrews2
 
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018April Bright
 
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...amiraiti
 
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010TEST Huddle
 
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architecture
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architectureRequirements for quality evaluation of software architecture
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architectureJoao Albuquerque
 
Sslean Validation 20070622
Sslean Validation 20070622Sslean Validation 20070622
Sslean Validation 20070622jancrielaard
 
Introduction to specification based test design techniques
Introduction to specification based test design techniquesIntroduction to specification based test design techniques
Introduction to specification based test design techniquesYogindernath Gupta
 
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case Design
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case DesignCause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case Design
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case DesignTechWell
 
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESS
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESSTHE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESS
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESSVESIT/University of Mumbai
 
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiran
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiranSoftware quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiran
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiranTanmi Kapoor
 
Analysis modeling in software engineering
Analysis modeling in software engineeringAnalysis modeling in software engineering
Analysis modeling in software engineeringMuhammadTalha436
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Testing throughout the software life cycle
Testing throughout the software life cycleTesting throughout the software life cycle
Testing throughout the software life cycle
 
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritization
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements PrioritizationConceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritization
Conceptualization of a Domain Specific Simulator for Requirements Prioritization
 
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based Approach
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based ApproachPrioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based Approach
Prioritizing Test Cases for Regression Testing A Model Based Approach
 
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )Calibration and validation model (Simulation )
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )
 
Gm assessing performance
Gm assessing performanceGm assessing performance
Gm assessing performance
 
Testing 1 - the Basics
Testing 1 - the BasicsTesting 1 - the Basics
Testing 1 - the Basics
 
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018
Vital QMS Process Validation Statistics - OMTEC 2018
 
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...
The result of applying a new testing model for improving the quality of softw...
 
CBAM
 CBAM CBAM
CBAM
 
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010
Peter Zimmerer - Passion For Testing, By Examples - EuroSTAR 2010
 
Sta unit 5(abimanyu)
Sta unit 5(abimanyu)Sta unit 5(abimanyu)
Sta unit 5(abimanyu)
 
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architecture
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architectureRequirements for quality evaluation of software architecture
Requirements for quality evaluation of software architecture
 
Validation and verification
Validation and verificationValidation and verification
Validation and verification
 
Model Validation
Model Validation Model Validation
Model Validation
 
Sslean Validation 20070622
Sslean Validation 20070622Sslean Validation 20070622
Sslean Validation 20070622
 
Introduction to specification based test design techniques
Introduction to specification based test design techniquesIntroduction to specification based test design techniques
Introduction to specification based test design techniques
 
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case Design
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case DesignCause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case Design
Cause-Effect Graphing: Rigorous Test Case Design
 
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESS
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESSTHE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESS
THE APPLICATION OF CAUSE EFFECT GRAPH FOR THE COLLEGE PLACEMENT PROCESS
 
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiran
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiranSoftware quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiran
Software quality metrics methodology _tanmi kiran
 
Analysis modeling in software engineering
Analysis modeling in software engineeringAnalysis modeling in software engineering
Analysis modeling in software engineering
 

Similar a Val Econ Cap Mdls Risk Conf Jacobs 1 10 V1

Insights-Model-Validation
Insights-Model-ValidationInsights-Model-Validation
Insights-Model-ValidationMike Wilkinson
 
Validating your-model
Validating your-modelValidating your-model
Validating your-modelGuy VdB
 
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...Jacob Kosoff
 
Chappuis Halder - Model validation review
Chappuis Halder - Model validation reviewChappuis Halder - Model validation review
Chappuis Halder - Model validation reviewAugustin Beyot
 
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...QuantUniversity
 
PMP Training - 08 project quality management
PMP Training - 08 project quality managementPMP Training - 08 project quality management
PMP Training - 08 project quality managementejlp12
 
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment Model
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment ModelAdopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment Model
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment ModelCognizant
 
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation Models
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation ModelsCalibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation Models
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation ModelsWSP
 
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky)
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky) Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky)
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky) Dhea Ffrizky
 
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...ijseajournal
 
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)tyas setyo
 
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary Candra
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary CandraTesting Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary Candra
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary CandraAnd11ka
 
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdf
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdfModel validation techniques in machine learning.pdf
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdfAnastasiaSteele10
 
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable Selection
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable SelectionAon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable Selection
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable SelectionEvan Sekeris
 
Model Management for FP&A
Model Management for FP&AModel Management for FP&A
Model Management for FP&ARob Trippe
 
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODEL
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODELSOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODEL
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODELAmin Bandeali
 
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle
Testing Throughout The Software Life CycleTesting Throughout The Software Life Cycle
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycleelvira munanda
 

Similar a Val Econ Cap Mdls Risk Conf Jacobs 1 10 V1 (20)

Insights-Model-Validation
Insights-Model-ValidationInsights-Model-Validation
Insights-Model-Validation
 
MRM
MRMMRM
MRM
 
Validating your-model
Validating your-modelValidating your-model
Validating your-model
 
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...
Rethinking Analytics, Analytical Processes, and Risk Architecture Across the ...
 
Chappuis Halder - Model validation review
Chappuis Halder - Model validation reviewChappuis Halder - Model validation review
Chappuis Halder - Model validation review
 
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...
Model Risk Management: Using an infinitely scalable stress testing platform f...
 
SR 11-7
SR 11-7SR 11-7
SR 11-7
 
PMP Training - 08 project quality management
PMP Training - 08 project quality managementPMP Training - 08 project quality management
PMP Training - 08 project quality management
 
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment Model
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment ModelAdopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment Model
Adopting the Right Software Test Maturity Assessment Model
 
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation Models
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation ModelsCalibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation Models
Calibration and Validation of Micro-Simulation Models
 
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky)
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky) Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky)
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle (Dhea Frizky)
 
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...
PRODUCT QUALITY EVALUATION METHOD (PQEM): TO UNDERSTAND THE EVOLUTION OF QUAL...
 
Software Testing
Software TestingSoftware Testing
Software Testing
 
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)
Testing throughout the software life cycle (software development models)
 
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary Candra
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary CandraTesting Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary Candra
Testing Throughout the Software Life Cycle part.1 - Andika Dwi Ary Candra
 
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdf
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdfModel validation techniques in machine learning.pdf
Model validation techniques in machine learning.pdf
 
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable Selection
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable SelectionAon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable Selection
Aon FI Risk Advisory - CCAR Variable Selection
 
Model Management for FP&A
Model Management for FP&AModel Management for FP&A
Model Management for FP&A
 
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODEL
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODELSOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODEL
SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT A PROCESS MODEL
 
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle
Testing Throughout The Software Life CycleTesting Throughout The Software Life Cycle
Testing Throughout The Software Life Cycle
 

Más de Michael Jacobs, Jr.

Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4
Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4
Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 Nomacr
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 NomacrJacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 Nomacr
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 NomacrMichael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and Loans
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and LoansUnderstanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and Loans
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and LoansMichael Jacobs, Jr.
 
An Empirical Study of Exposure at Default
An Empirical Study of Exposure at DefaultAn Empirical Study of Exposure at Default
An Empirical Study of Exposure at DefaultMichael Jacobs, Jr.
 
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...Michael Jacobs, Jr.
 

Más de Michael Jacobs, Jr. (16)

Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4
Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4
Jacobs stress testing_aug13_8-15-13_v4
 
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5
Jacobs Reg Frmwrks Mkt Risk Presentation Julu12 7 15 12 V5
 
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16
Jacobs Dodd Frank&Basel3 July12 7 15 12 V16
 
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...
Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks ...
 
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 Nomacr
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 NomacrJacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 Nomacr
Jacobs Str Tst Crdt Prtfl Risk Mar2012 3 22 12 V20 Nomacr
 
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11
Jacobs Mdl Rsk Par Crdt Der Risk Nov2011 V17 11 7 11
 
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12
Jacobs Liquidty Risk Garp 2 16 12
 
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1
Jacobs Dofdd Frank&Basel3 Risk Nov11 11 8 11 V1
 
Lgd Risk Resolved Bog And Occ
Lgd Risk Resolved Bog And OccLgd Risk Resolved Bog And Occ
Lgd Risk Resolved Bog And Occ
 
Lgd Model Jacobs 10 10 V2[1]
Lgd Model Jacobs 10 10 V2[1]Lgd Model Jacobs 10 10 V2[1]
Lgd Model Jacobs 10 10 V2[1]
 
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10
Bag Jacobs Ead Model Ccl Irmc 6 10
 
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1
Jacobs Kiefer Bayes Guide 3 10 V1
 
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1
Risk Aggregation Inanoglu Jacobs 6 09 V1
 
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and Loans
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and LoansUnderstanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and Loans
Understanding and Predicting Ultimate Loss-Given-Default on Bonds and Loans
 
An Empirical Study of Exposure at Default
An Empirical Study of Exposure at DefaultAn Empirical Study of Exposure at Default
An Empirical Study of Exposure at Default
 
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...
An Empirical Study of the Returns on Defaulted Debt and the Discount Rate for...
 

Val Econ Cap Mdls Risk Conf Jacobs 1 10 V1

  • 1. Validation of Economic Capital Models: State of the Practice, Supervisory Expectations and Results from a Bank Study Michael Jacobs, Ph.D., CFA Senior Economist / Credit Risk Analysis Division U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Risk Conference on Economic Capital, February 2010 The views expressed herein are those of the authos and do not necessarily represent the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Department of the Treasury.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Risk Proxy Data Summary (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08)
  • 24. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Distributions of Risk Proxies (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08)
  • 25. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Correlations of Risk Proxies (Largest Banks As Of 4Q08) )
  • 26. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Absolute EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 27. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Absolute EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 28. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Relative EC Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 29. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – % Diversification Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 30. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – Goodness of Fit Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 31. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – EC Variability Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 32. Validation Example: Alternative Risk Aggregation Models – EC Variability Comparison (Largest Banks As of 4Q08)
  • 33.  
  • 34.
  • 35.

Notas del editor

  1. VaR increas. in size Comp diff risk agg meth acr bnk obs VCA prod cons the lowest VaR & either the ECS or AGCS highest, foll by TCS cons., GCS “benchmark” & FC us. tow. mdl., CS tow. Low but above VCA. FG tends close GCS but us. just little lower,TCS just little higher GCS (some cases not by much). e.g., T200; GS 764B vs. EC 859B vs. GC 930B (larger) vs. VCA 688B smallest, CC 728B sm. Side & FC 752B toward middle
  2. NCVs for PDB > VaR: excl VCA & ECS 17-76% vs 7-12% ECS uniformly lowest 12.2-17.6% VCA much higher 83.4-158.2% Excl above: AGC notably higher stand. Cop’s: 44.1%-75.5% GC on low side 17.3-34.3% vs. TC sl higher 22.5-39.5% CC 22.7-30.0% close GC on lower end
  3. As % BVA VaR looks to be somewhat incr w/size – 6-8% AT200, lower-mid teens T45 & then mid-high teens PNC
  4. PDBs wide var. acr. bnk/mdlsbut cannot see diff by biz mix ECS yild very high values->risk updoubl to tripl if simpl add risks Exc ECS rng 10%-50 GCS tow middle (41-58%), VCA lower end (31-41%), GCAS lowest (10-21%).
  5. GOF tests highly mixed: rej null mdl fits data (rel to EC) just under 1/2 cases 14/30 & do not lend to clear pattern. But gen. rej. fit not very high sig lvl->perh mdls dec job: only 3 rej > 1% lvl (AGCS for AT200&JPMC, AGCS for JPMC), only 1 at 5% AFCS for AT200, rem 9 at only 10% AT200 most rej all cases (but 1&2 @ 10&5%), foll by JPMC (2 rej T&AG), CITI and WELLS (2 rej e. 10%), BofA&PNC the least (1 e. at 10%l).GCS maybe OK in that rej on AT200 @ 5%? Across bnks TCS&FCS rej 4X the most often (4/3 10%,FCS 1 @ 5%) AGC only 2 rej but only 2 @ 1% lvl & lowest PVs, CCS other 1% rej & 1 10% rej
  6. VCA much higher anything else: 27.8-45.3 GCS 7.1-9% slight< ECS 8.1-13.6% TC cl ECS 7.5-16.4% GC in betw 7.5-10.8% CC on low side 5.9-7.0% Hard to see biz mix patt (JPMC/CITI vs others)
  7. Marg btstrp ord mag gr: excl EC/VCA 6-14% in corr vs. 34-70% marg TC highest 43.6-62.2% GCS 35.4-44.8% GC close GC but more range 33.5-52.7% CC most range 25.2-69.6% Hard to see biz mix patt (JPMC/CITI vs others)
  8. NCVs for PDB much > VaR: excl VCA & ECS 17-76% vs 7-12% ECS uniformly lowest 12.2-17.6% VCA much higher 83.4-158.2% Excl above: TC highest 39.5-69.5 NOW GC high end 38.6-56.7% &. close AGC on high side 36.8-53.1% CC lowest 19.9-43.7%