2. ‘softer’ alternative to the word ‘privatization’
enable private organizations to get a market
share of public service provision.
It seems fair to say that a number of
governments have tried to avoid using the
terms “privatization” and “contracting out” in
favor of speaking about partnerships
4. a specific form of privatisation was
developed to deal with limitations on public
borrowing. This involved using a private
company to borrow money, build a new
hospital, school, road, etc, and then operate
it over many years, recouping the investment
and profit from payments
8. Framework for evaluating PPP proposals against public sector alternative
Evidence Note
1 Cost of Capital Interest + dividends PPP more Private sector has to pay
expensive higher interest rates than
government
2 Cost of PPP more Higher cost of ‘turnkey’
construction expensive projects, offset by saving on
cost of overruns
3 Cost of operation Efficiency Neutral Empirical evidence suggests
no
significant difference
4 Transaction costs Preparation PPP more Costs of preparing contracts
&tendering expensive &
tenders
5 Uncertainty Renegotiation & PPP more Future renegotiations &
contingent liabilities risky changes