SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 27
Breaking through the
  “Cinderella Bias” barrier:
  Stepfamily relationships

Celia Falchi, Ian M. Evans & Antonia Lyons
       Massey University, Wellington
Acknowledgements
   Ian Evans & Antonia Lyons – Supervisors
   New Zealand Families Commission
   My Husband
   Mum (my stepmum Sera) – My inspiration and role model
The Big Question
Do positive functioning stepfamilies exist?
Because one question is never
         enough…
   How do functioning stepfamilies with good step
    relationships work around everyday issues of
    fairness?
   What are the most common everyday situations
    in these families that result in perceptions of
    unfairness by children and adults?
   What resolution strategies are used to resolve
    their situational issues?
   Does fairness, emotions, forgiveness and/or
    acceptance influence family functioning in these
    families?
   What advice do they have for other stepfamilies
    when trying to deal with fairness issues?
Why is this research important?
   It is helpful to know what to aim towards.
   It is even more helpful to know how to do this.
   What has Positive Psychology got to do with it?
What has past research uncovered
           already?




   Not too much
   Fairness matters, and children have a very
    intense fairness radar!
Factors that contribute to
        stepfamily success
 All for one and one for all (Banker &
  Gaertner, 1998)
 Spending quality time together and
  building positive memories (Hutchinson,
  Afifi, & Krause, 2007)
 Fairness, acceptance, and forgiveness
  (Whiting, Smith, Bamett, & Grafsky, 2007)
 Your child is my family too (Michaels,
  2006)
DO YOU HAVE A HARMONIOUS FUNCTIONING
              STEPFAMILY?
       ...WELL MOST OF THE TIME!
So who are they?
The Family Participants
   40 families (N=155 total family member participants), and consisted
    of 9 stepparents, 20 biological parents, 47 both a step & biological
    parent, 79 stepchildren.
   Lived together between 2-12 years
   The participant families had between 2 - 6 members taking part in
    the research
   This families had between 2 – 8 living in the same household

                                                                                  44
      50
                                                                           35
      40
                23     24
      30
                                                                                       Female
                                                        15
      20                                                                               Male
                                          7                     5
      10                            2

       0
            Both a step &      Stepparent only   Biological Parent only   Stepchild
           biological parent
The Task
   Family Meeting
      Come up with a situation (fairness situation) and a resolution
      Have a turn presenting your situation to the rest of the family
      After each person’s turn (including your own) put your emotional
       responses into the booklet
      If the situation was unfair did you forgive? Yes or No. If yes, then
       why? What would you have preferred to have happen or can be
       done better next time
     Any advice for other stepfamilies when dealing with fairness
       issues?
   Each family member participant to fill in a Family Assessment
    Measurement Scale questionnaire (FAM III)
    (Skinner, Steinhauer, Santa-Barbara, 2005)
Analysis
Scenarios
                                                                       Stepparent
                                                                Both      only      Parent   Stepchild
Differential treatment of children                               9         0          2         13

Same rule for all children regardless of age or relationship     8         0          0          6

Fighting amongst children                                        5         1          1         17

Lack of a specific support from other famiy members              5         2          4          4

Disciplining child for misbehaviour                              5         0          3          5

Issues around household chores                                   4         1          0         10

Missing out or gaining when at other household or with other     3         1          2          4
biological parent
Promising to do something, or supposed have, and not doing it    2         1          1          5

Disagreement or argument between child and step parent           1         2          1          5

Did not come up with a scenario                                  1         0          0          4

Expecting too much of a family member                            1         0          3          1
18

              16

              14

              12
Frequencies




              10

               8

               6

               4

               2
                               Both
               0
                               Stepparent only
                               Parent
                               Stepchild




                   Scenarios
Resolutions
60


50


40


30


20


10
                   Frequency
 0
25



              20
                                 Both
Frequencies




                                 Stepparent only
              15
                                 Parent
                                 Stepchild
              10



               5



               0




                   Resolutions
Scenario & Resolutions
   “Some children are in the house all the time so do more
    jobs – others ½ the week so I allocate specific jobs
    during the week” (Step & Biological Parent, Female, 43).

   “At Christmas time Sarah (stepsister) gets more presents
    than me…John (father) doesn’t see me. That’s how
    Sarah gets more presents, cause John hasn’t seen me.
    Mum and Matthew (stepdad) tries to make up for it.
    (Stepchild, Male, 10).

   “ Getting called the worst stepbrother ever by my
    stepsister then later on gets in trouble for bad language
    (Stepchild, Male, 11).
Family responses
                                     Dad
Mum


                          Scenario
               Scenario




               Scenario   Scenario
                                       Child
                                        1
      Child
       2
Fairness
Emotions
   Emotion ratings were rated for when the situation
    occurred (pre), and again at the time of the family
    meeting (post).
   The family member participants were able to select
    any or all of the following emotions:
      Happy: Fine: Annoyed: Angry: Sad: Guilty:
       Nothing: and Acceptance
     The ratings were from 0 = nothing at all, to 5 =
       extremely
Emotions
                      4.0


                      3.5


                      3.0
Mean Emotion Rating




                      2.5


                      2.0
                                           Both

                      1.5                  Stepparent only
                                           Parent

                      1.0                  Stepchild


                      0.5


                      0.0




                             Resolutions
Forgiveness
                               FAM-III Mean scores in relation to Forgiveness

                       50.00



                       48.00
on the FAM III scale




                       46.00



                       44.00
                                                                                    Mean scores
  Mean Scores




                       42.00



                       40.00



                       38.00
                               Yes                 No              Not applicable

                                         Is Forgiveness Granted?
Why forgiveness
   “Because we have all made it better by doing exciting
    things on the weekend as well as the week”
    (Stepchild, Female, 12).

   “Because it happens a lot of times and we forgive each
    other…we should try not to moan and groan to each
    other” (Stepchild, Female, 10).

   “Because it was hard to keep up with the birthday
    party’s” (Stepchild, Male, 12)
FAM III
Family Role Differences
                    50.00                                                             47.23
                                 46.25
                                                                                 45.20
                    45.00    41.48          42.00
                                                 40.57
                                                                         38.40
                    40.00                                           37.07

                    35.00
Mean FAM T scores




                    30.00

                    25.00
                                                                                              Female

                    20.00                                                                     Male

                    15.00

                    10.00

                     5.00

                     0.00
                              Both       Stepparent only            Parent       Stepchild

                                                   Family Member Role
Advice
   “Anyone who thinks it is easy being part of a stepfamily has got rocks in
    their heads. It can get very complicated and needs a lot of understanding
    between the adults. I think the main thing is to treat everyone as an equal.
    This can be hard sometimes but it is important” (Step & Biological
    Parent, Male, 43).

   “Communication is very important. Laugher and family time together is
    helpful too. Mealtimes should be spent together at the table where each
    family member can tell about their day. It is important to make each family
    member feel loved and wanted” (Step & Biological Parent, Female, 48).

   “Having a stepparent is difficult. Especially when you do not completely get
    along. You just need to accept that it’s no one’s fault that you are dealt this
    set of cards, and to just love and accept each other for their roles in the
    family…be open and honest, because anything that is causing issues may
    be due to lack of communication” (Stepchild, Male, 15).
Any Questions?

Más contenido relacionado

Más de NZ Psychological Society

Oom not doom a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley Woods
Oom not doom   a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley WoodsOom not doom   a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley Woods
Oom not doom a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley WoodsNZ Psychological Society
 
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...NZ Psychological Society
 
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...NZ Psychological Society
 
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...NZ Psychological Society
 
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clients
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clientsM Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clients
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clientsNZ Psychological Society
 
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology NZ Psychological Society
 
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescents
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescentsR Anand, Social relationships of adolescents
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescentsNZ Psychological Society
 
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction ppt
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction pptF O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction ppt
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction pptNZ Psychological Society
 
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment NZ Psychological Society
 
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011NZ Psychological Society
 
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth project
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth projectS Calvert, The connectedness in youth project
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth projectNZ Psychological Society
 
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recovery
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recoveryS de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recovery
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recoveryNZ Psychological Society
 
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative care
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative careR Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative care
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative careNZ Psychological Society
 

Más de NZ Psychological Society (20)

Oom not doom a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley Woods
Oom not doom   a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley WoodsOom not doom   a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley Woods
Oom not doom a novel method for improving psychological science, Bradley Woods
 
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
 
Reflections on depression, Hilary Bradley
Reflections on depression, Hilary BradleyReflections on depression, Hilary Bradley
Reflections on depression, Hilary Bradley
 
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...
Qualitative research as an adjunct to the therapeutic training of counselling...
 
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...
Do increased levels of wellbeing lead to increased levels of resilience in ad...
 
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clients
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clientsM Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clients
M Lammers, Culturally responsive interventions for Maori clients
 
S Reid, Treatment options for insomnia
S Reid, Treatment options for insomniaS Reid, Treatment options for insomnia
S Reid, Treatment options for insomnia
 
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology
S Reid, Application of the MTC:R3 Typology
 
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescents
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescentsR Anand, Social relationships of adolescents
R Anand, Social relationships of adolescents
 
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction ppt
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction pptF O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction ppt
F O'Connor, Lubricating civic reconstruction ppt
 
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment
N Wilson, Dynamic Risk and Protective Assessment
 
R Gammon, Family therapy training
R Gammon, Family therapy trainingR Gammon, Family therapy training
R Gammon, Family therapy training
 
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011
G Sutton, NZDF response to Christchurch eq feb 2011
 
D de Jong, Prostate cancer brachytherapy
D de Jong, Prostate cancer brachytherapyD de Jong, Prostate cancer brachytherapy
D de Jong, Prostate cancer brachytherapy
 
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth project
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth projectS Calvert, The connectedness in youth project
S Calvert, The connectedness in youth project
 
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recovery
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recoveryS de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recovery
S de Wattignar, Understanding the process of supported recovery
 
The Psychologists Board presentation
The Psychologists Board presentationThe Psychologists Board presentation
The Psychologists Board presentation
 
Tanya Breen, Diagnosis HFA AS
Tanya Breen, Diagnosis HFA ASTanya Breen, Diagnosis HFA AS
Tanya Breen, Diagnosis HFA AS
 
H Valentine, Kia Ngawari ki te Awatea
H Valentine, Kia Ngawari ki te AwateaH Valentine, Kia Ngawari ki te Awatea
H Valentine, Kia Ngawari ki te Awatea
 
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative care
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative careR Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative care
R Frey, Two ’worldviews’ of palliative care
 

Último

Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxInspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxShubham Rawat
 
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxE J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxJackieSparrow3
 
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...JeylaisaManabat1
 
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证kbdhl05e
 
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan
 
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)oannq
 

Último (6)

Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxInspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
 
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxE J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
 
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...
Module-2-Lesson-2-COMMUNICATION-AIDS-AND-STRATEGIES-USING-TOOLS-OF-TECHNOLOGY...
 
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
 
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
 
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
 

Stepfamily Fairness: Resolving Issues and Building Understanding

  • 1. Breaking through the “Cinderella Bias” barrier: Stepfamily relationships Celia Falchi, Ian M. Evans & Antonia Lyons Massey University, Wellington
  • 2. Acknowledgements  Ian Evans & Antonia Lyons – Supervisors  New Zealand Families Commission  My Husband  Mum (my stepmum Sera) – My inspiration and role model
  • 3. The Big Question Do positive functioning stepfamilies exist?
  • 4. Because one question is never enough…  How do functioning stepfamilies with good step relationships work around everyday issues of fairness?  What are the most common everyday situations in these families that result in perceptions of unfairness by children and adults?  What resolution strategies are used to resolve their situational issues?  Does fairness, emotions, forgiveness and/or acceptance influence family functioning in these families?  What advice do they have for other stepfamilies when trying to deal with fairness issues?
  • 5. Why is this research important?  It is helpful to know what to aim towards.  It is even more helpful to know how to do this.  What has Positive Psychology got to do with it?
  • 6. What has past research uncovered already?  Not too much  Fairness matters, and children have a very intense fairness radar!
  • 7. Factors that contribute to stepfamily success  All for one and one for all (Banker & Gaertner, 1998)  Spending quality time together and building positive memories (Hutchinson, Afifi, & Krause, 2007)  Fairness, acceptance, and forgiveness (Whiting, Smith, Bamett, & Grafsky, 2007)  Your child is my family too (Michaels, 2006)
  • 8. DO YOU HAVE A HARMONIOUS FUNCTIONING STEPFAMILY? ...WELL MOST OF THE TIME!
  • 9. So who are they?
  • 10. The Family Participants  40 families (N=155 total family member participants), and consisted of 9 stepparents, 20 biological parents, 47 both a step & biological parent, 79 stepchildren.  Lived together between 2-12 years  The participant families had between 2 - 6 members taking part in the research  This families had between 2 – 8 living in the same household 44 50 35 40 23 24 30 Female 15 20 Male 7 5 10 2 0 Both a step & Stepparent only Biological Parent only Stepchild biological parent
  • 11. The Task  Family Meeting  Come up with a situation (fairness situation) and a resolution  Have a turn presenting your situation to the rest of the family  After each person’s turn (including your own) put your emotional responses into the booklet  If the situation was unfair did you forgive? Yes or No. If yes, then why? What would you have preferred to have happen or can be done better next time Any advice for other stepfamilies when dealing with fairness issues?  Each family member participant to fill in a Family Assessment Measurement Scale questionnaire (FAM III) (Skinner, Steinhauer, Santa-Barbara, 2005)
  • 13. Scenarios Stepparent Both only Parent Stepchild Differential treatment of children 9 0 2 13 Same rule for all children regardless of age or relationship 8 0 0 6 Fighting amongst children 5 1 1 17 Lack of a specific support from other famiy members 5 2 4 4 Disciplining child for misbehaviour 5 0 3 5 Issues around household chores 4 1 0 10 Missing out or gaining when at other household or with other 3 1 2 4 biological parent Promising to do something, or supposed have, and not doing it 2 1 1 5 Disagreement or argument between child and step parent 1 2 1 5 Did not come up with a scenario 1 0 0 4 Expecting too much of a family member 1 0 3 1
  • 14. 18 16 14 12 Frequencies 10 8 6 4 2 Both 0 Stepparent only Parent Stepchild Scenarios
  • 16. 25 20 Both Frequencies Stepparent only 15 Parent Stepchild 10 5 0 Resolutions
  • 17. Scenario & Resolutions  “Some children are in the house all the time so do more jobs – others ½ the week so I allocate specific jobs during the week” (Step & Biological Parent, Female, 43).  “At Christmas time Sarah (stepsister) gets more presents than me…John (father) doesn’t see me. That’s how Sarah gets more presents, cause John hasn’t seen me. Mum and Matthew (stepdad) tries to make up for it. (Stepchild, Male, 10).  “ Getting called the worst stepbrother ever by my stepsister then later on gets in trouble for bad language (Stepchild, Male, 11).
  • 18. Family responses Dad Mum Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario Child 1 Child 2
  • 20. Emotions  Emotion ratings were rated for when the situation occurred (pre), and again at the time of the family meeting (post).  The family member participants were able to select any or all of the following emotions:  Happy: Fine: Annoyed: Angry: Sad: Guilty: Nothing: and Acceptance The ratings were from 0 = nothing at all, to 5 = extremely
  • 21. Emotions 4.0 3.5 3.0 Mean Emotion Rating 2.5 2.0 Both 1.5 Stepparent only Parent 1.0 Stepchild 0.5 0.0 Resolutions
  • 22. Forgiveness FAM-III Mean scores in relation to Forgiveness 50.00 48.00 on the FAM III scale 46.00 44.00 Mean scores Mean Scores 42.00 40.00 38.00 Yes No Not applicable Is Forgiveness Granted?
  • 23. Why forgiveness  “Because we have all made it better by doing exciting things on the weekend as well as the week” (Stepchild, Female, 12).  “Because it happens a lot of times and we forgive each other…we should try not to moan and groan to each other” (Stepchild, Female, 10).  “Because it was hard to keep up with the birthday party’s” (Stepchild, Male, 12)
  • 25. Family Role Differences 50.00 47.23 46.25 45.20 45.00 41.48 42.00 40.57 38.40 40.00 37.07 35.00 Mean FAM T scores 30.00 25.00 Female 20.00 Male 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 Both Stepparent only Parent Stepchild Family Member Role
  • 26. Advice  “Anyone who thinks it is easy being part of a stepfamily has got rocks in their heads. It can get very complicated and needs a lot of understanding between the adults. I think the main thing is to treat everyone as an equal. This can be hard sometimes but it is important” (Step & Biological Parent, Male, 43).  “Communication is very important. Laugher and family time together is helpful too. Mealtimes should be spent together at the table where each family member can tell about their day. It is important to make each family member feel loved and wanted” (Step & Biological Parent, Female, 48).  “Having a stepparent is difficult. Especially when you do not completely get along. You just need to accept that it’s no one’s fault that you are dealt this set of cards, and to just love and accept each other for their roles in the family…be open and honest, because anything that is causing issues may be due to lack of communication” (Stepchild, Male, 15).

Notas del editor

  1. 84 families contacted me with interest about the research and were sent research packs.Each family were asked to hold a family meeting. Each family member was supplied with a pen, a response booklet, and the psychometric measure the Brief FAM III – general scale. It is self report questionnaire which measures how the individual perceives their family functioning. Each family was supplied with an interactive DVD that explained the research and what to do, and to talked them through their family meeting. The DVD went for an hour and allowed time slots where it played music and pictures whilst family members wrote down their responses to other family members presenting their scenario.
  2. Out of the 155 family member participants, and using thematic analysis, we came up with 17 possible themes for participant scenarios. Those tally’s you see on the table are frequencies. I have colour coded in rank order. The light cream is the highest tally for each family member role, the yellow is the second highest tally, and the orange is the third highest.These themes are approximately 93% of all the themes chosen. The rest of them have fewer than 3 participants that had chosen those themes.The first six scenarios are 75% of what overall family participants chose to talk about. As you can also see in this table some situational issues are represented more often depending on family role. An example: the scenario “differential treatment of children” was a more predominant theme with parents that were in a step and biological parenting role, than if they were biological parents only.
  3. Here is a what bar graph looks like. Due to the low numbers of actual stepparents only and biological parents we need to be careful generalising this to the rest of the population. A chi square analysis was conducted on this and showed significance with scenarios chosen were influenced by family role. However, there were less than 5 counts in some of the cell groupings therefore the chi analysis is violated and the significance is not reliable. In our population sample however, some scenarios do seem to be chosen by particular family members more often than others.
  4. Through thematic analysis, we found there were 8 potential resolutions that all the family participants came up with.The second theme that has some of the wording is cut off is communication – where the situation is discussed and accepted.
  5. A chi analysis was used to see if resolutions were more likely to be chosen due to the family role a person had, but again we did not have a high enough sample for this. It came back insignificant anyway. But it is still an interesting graph.
  6. The first quote is from a parent who has two roles in the family. She is both a mother and stepmother. The situation was coded under - household chores, and the resolution was coded under - turns and sharing.I have to admit that doing this research has made me laugh and very sad at times. This situation was coded under – Missing out (this is due to the inequalities that can occur due to holidays, events, and gifts children are either shared between households or one/some of the stepsiblings other biological parents are not involved). The resolution was coded under: compromise. This child’s family compensate by paying a little extra for him at Christmas. Sadly this did occur with a few of the research families. In another family in a similar situation, one stepfather said that it was unfair that the stepchildren were not his own.This third scenario was coded as – Fighting, and the resolution – penance; as the sister got in trouble for her behaviour.
  7. Now this is where the analysis starts to get a little tricky.We have issues with autocorrelations.Each participant will rate emotions of their own scenario, but also feelings with each other member of their family. This number is also dependent on the particular family taking part in the research. Not just 4, but could give up to five sets of emotional ratings depending on the number in their family.These emotions can also differ depending on their role in the family, the scenario itself, and the family role of the person presenting the scenario.
  8. After each family member read their scenario out to the rest of the family, each member would then record in their participant response booklet if they thought the situation was fair or not, and then rate it out of 5.80% of the scenarios and their resolutions were rated as fair, with obviously 20% rated as unfair.The mean ratings for both mostly sat on and above three to five out of 5.
  9. Emotions were rated for the time the situation occurred and again for how the person felt about it during the family meeting.There is the list of emotions they could select from.
  10. This is still undergoing analysis, and we are still deciding on what procedure to use. I can tell you that if we look at all of the family members responses – there is change with the pre and post emotions. Over time negative emotions become less, and acceptance rises. However at present pooling all the scenarios together would mean that each family member would rate emotions more than once in the same analysis therefore causing autocorrelation. I have told this is a bad thing so we may need to figure out what else to do, or how to justify this.
  11. Amongst this sample population we had a look at whether there was a relationship between forgiveness and family functioning as measured by the FAM III brief general scale. Again this analysis is still a work in progress.But for the moment... For our families I looked at all the possible scenarios between family members together (even though we still have an autocorrelation issue here), and it still is interesting to see that forgiveness seems to have a relationship with mean scores in the strengths to excellent functioning range.[significance was .000 using ANOVA]
  12. This first quote is in regards to missing out on activities that the rest of the family does during the week, because she is at her other parents household. This second quote is from a child talking about being asked to do household chores and being asked several times to do them. She also suggested what they should try to do to improve on that situation.This third quote is from a stepchild who lives with 7 other family members. The family had to decide on an age limit on birthday parties (13 years old), as well as only having one on alternating years. This stepson chose that he would forgive his parents for this decision and seemed to understand that it was getting too much for them to keep up.
  13. We used this Family assessment measure – the Brief general scale to help measure family functioning. Each family member filled one out.The majority of the families mean scores were on par with the traditional reference family population in the FAM measure.The average family mean T score was 43.85, which fits just within the increasing strengths range of the FAM scale. An average score would fit around 45-55.
  14. A two-way between-groups analysis of variance was conducted to explore the impact of gender and family role with family functioning (as measured with the FAM III brief general scale). There is no significant difference between males and females but there was with family role, with a medium effect size according to Cohen’s statistical criteria. However, we need to be very careful with generalising this to other stepfamilies, as the gender distribution in these groups was uneven.
  15. This is a small sample of some of the excellent advice written by our family participant members.