SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
An Overview of Tennis and Golf
World Ranking Systems
(Men’s and Women’s)
A sports ranking classification system is a
system that analyzes the results of sports
matches to provide rankings for players or
teams of a particular league or
competition.
Rankings are arranged in an ordinal
fashion, with the highest rank person or
team earning the #1 rank, the second
highest the #2 rank, and so on.
 In

some sports, like tennis and golf, the
ranking system is used to determine
qualification for entry and seeding in
tournaments.
 In other sports, like American college
basketball and football, the ranking
system is used to determine opportunities
to participate in post-season competitions,
and also seeding and home-team
advantage within the tournament.
The system of determining national and
international rankings for tennis and golf
have developed over a number of years to
deal with changes in the light of conflicts
between amateur and professional tours,
the commercial viability of tournaments and
prize money allocation.
 Association

of Tennis Professionals (ATP)
formed in 1972 as a kind of union for male
players, and a year later introduced its own
computerized ranking system, which is
recognized today as the standard “official”
system.
 The Women’s Tennis Association (WTA)
formed in 1973 and soon created a similar
ranking system based on a multi-tiered
structure of tournaments.
Since the 70s, there have been numerous
changes to both ranking systems, as
oversights were made apparent and
changes made to account for the massive
growth in tennis globally and commercially.
The four Grand Slams (controlled by the ITF) are
worth the most ranking points (winners get 2000
points), followed by the ATP World Tour events,
split into the ATP World Tour Finals (1100-1500
points), the nine ATP World Tour Masters 1000
tournaments (1000 points).
 The eleven ATP World Tour 500 series
competitions (500 points).
 The forty ATP World Tour 250 series competitions
(250 points).
 Next are the ATP Challenger (75-125 points) and
then ITF Futures tournaments (17-33 points).

Rankings are determined by taking the
total from the best 18 tournaments (19 if a
player qualifies for the Masters’ Cup) from
which the player earned the most points
from the previous 52 weeks.
Points by Round

Futures

ATP World
Tour 250

Challengers

ATP World
Tour 500

Masters
1000

Grand Slam

Winner

35

125

250

500

1000

2000

Finals

20

75

150

300

600

1200

Semifinals

10

45

90

180

360

720

Quarterfinals

4

25

45

90

180

360

Round of 16

1

10

20

45

90

180

Round of 32

12

20

45

90

Round of 64

10

25

45

10

10

16

25

Round of 128

Qualifying

5

5

10
Singles
Playoff
Round
Playoff
Round
1st Round
Loss
1st Round
1st Round
Quarterfinals
Quarterfinals
Semifinals
Semifinals
Finals
Finals
Finals

Win per
Match

Loss per
Match

Team
Bonus

Performance
Bonus

Wins
Cumulative

Playoff
Round

5

Loss per
Match

Team
Bonus

Wins
Cumulative

10

1st Round
Loss

10

10

1st Round

10
40
40
65
65
70
70
75

40
80
145
210
280
350
425
500

75
75

Doubles

Win per
Match

125

625

50

50

Quaterfinals

80

130

Semifinals

90

220

Finals

95

315

Winners

95

35

350
 The

WTA structure also looked different
before and after 2009.
 Below the Grand Slam events, the
women’s tour used to comprise Tier I and II
events, which are now divided into three
classes of Premier event, and Tier III and
IV events, which are now called
International tournaments.
Like the ATP, it prioritizes and offers most points for its
four Grand Slam events (winners get 2000 points), but
has a different system of mandatory and optional
events below this.
 The top women must play four of its Premier
Mandatory tournaments (1000 points), as well as the
end-of-season Tour Championships (1500 points) and
at least two of the Premier 5 tournaments (900 points).
 They make up their remaining points from a choice of
ten Premier tournaments (470 points) and 31
International (280 points) tournaments. Below this are
the numerous smaller ITF tournaments (12-150
points).

Points by
Round
Winner
Finals
Semifinals
Quarterfin
als
Round of
16
Round of
32
Round of
64
Round of
128

Qualifier
Round
Robin
Match
Round
Robin Win

ITF Circuit
Events

International
Events

Premier
600,700

Premier
5

Tournament
of
WTA
Champions Championships Majors

Premier
Mandatory

150
110

280
200

470
320

900
620

1000
700

375
255

1500
1050

2000
1400

80

130

200

395

450

180

690

900

40

70

120

225

250

500

20

30

60

125

140

280

1

15

40

70

80

160

1

1

1

50

100

5

5

30

60

6

10

12

30

25

70

35

160
 Initially,

the rankings were calculated by a
total point score over a three-year period,
with a system that added more weight to
recent results.
 In 1989, this system was replaced by one
that better rewarded quality over quantity,
and did not in effect discriminate against
older golfers who tended to play fewer
tournaments.
Alongside the four Majors (winners get 100
points), are the World Golf Championship (WGC)
tournaments (avg. 70-80 points) and regular tour
events.
 Of the leading nine professional tours, the PGA
and European tours offer the most points
(minimum 24 points).
 Next is the Japan Golf Tour and the PGA Tour of
Australasia (16 points).
 Then Sunshine, Asian and Nationwide Tours (14
points).
 And lastly, Challenge Tour (12 points) and the
Canadian Tour (6 points).

Total
Ranking
with Points

Canadian
Tour

Challenge
Tour

Asian/Sunshine/Web.com

Japan/Australasia

Asian
Tour

PGA/European

BMW
Championship

Players
Championship

Major
Championships

1

6

12

14

16

20

24

64

80

100

2

3.6

7.2

8.4

9.6

12

14.4

38.4

48

60

3

2.4

4.8

5.6

6.4

8

9.6

25.6

32

40

4

1.8

3.6

4.2

4.8

6

7.2

19.2

24

30

5

1.44

2.88

3.36

3.84

4.8

5.76

15.36

19.2

24

6

1.2

2.4

2.8

3.2

4

4.8

12.8

16

20

7

2.16

2.52

2.88

3.6

4.32

11.52

14.4

18

8

1.92

2.24

2.56

3.2

3.84

10.24

12.8

16

9

1.8

2.1

2.4

3

3.6

9.6

12

15

10

1.68

1.96

2.24

2.8

3.36

8.96

11.2

14

11

1.56

1.82

2.08

2.6

3.21

8.32

10.4

13

12

1.44

1.68

1.92

2.4

2.88

7.68

9.6

12

13

1.32

1.56

1.76

2.2

2.64

7.04

8.8

11

14

1.2

1.44

1.6

2

2.4

6.4

8

10

15

1.32

1.52

1.9

2.28

6.08

7.6

9.5

16

1.2

1.44

1.8

2.16

5.76

7.2

9

17

1.36

1.7

2.04

5.44

6.8

8.5

18

1.28

1.6

1.92

5.12

6.4

8

19

1.2

1.5

1.8

4.8

6

7.5

1.4

1.68

4.48

5.6

7

20
 An

official ranking system for women’s golf
was devised in 2004 at the World
Congress of Women’s Golf, but was not
instigated until 2006.
 The system is similar to the men’s, in that
a player’s average score over a two-year
period is considered, with most recent
tournaments being more heavily weighted.
Total Ranking
with Points

Future Tour
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

12
7.2
4.8
3.6
2.88
2.4
2.16
1.92
1.8
1.68
1.56
1.44
1.32
1.2

Australian LPGA Korea LPGA
14
8.4
5.6
4.2
3.36
2.8
2.52
2.24
2.1
1.96
1.82
1.68
1.56
1.44
1.32
1.2

LPGA of Japan
16
9.6
6.4
4.8
3.84
3.2
2.88
2.56
2.4
2.24
2.08
1.92
1.76
1.6
1.52
1.44
1.36
1.28
1.2

20
12
8
6
4.8
4
3.6
3.2
3
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4

Ladies European
Tour
LPGA Tour
24
14.4
9.6
7.2
5.76
4.8
4.32
3.84
3.6
3.36
3.21
2.88
2.64
2.4
2.28
2.16
2.04
1.92
1.8
1.68

Major
Championships

60
30
28.5
26
24.5
23
21.5
20
18.5
17
15.5
14
12.5
11
9.5
8
6.5
5
3.5
2

100
60
40
30
24
20
18
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9.5
9
8.5
8
7.5
7
Overall, professional tennis players and
golfers recognize the value of the ranking
system, and are always at the forefront of
changes made to their respective systems.
 Governing bodies consult players when
deciding on potential changes, and are
open to suggestions to ensure a suitable
balance between fairness and striving to
maximize growth in their sports.


More Related Content

Similar to Rankings determination- Golf and Tennis presentation

Similar to Rankings determination- Golf and Tennis presentation (15)

All India Tennis Association
All India Tennis AssociationAll India Tennis Association
All India Tennis Association
 
First fare 2013 district model overview 2014
First fare 2013   district model overview 2014First fare 2013   district model overview 2014
First fare 2013 district model overview 2014
 
Tennis 4.28.15 final
Tennis 4.28.15 finalTennis 4.28.15 final
Tennis 4.28.15 final
 
Englis f1 origin
Englis f1 originEnglis f1 origin
Englis f1 origin
 
Ijf wrl 2013_05_27
Ijf wrl 2013_05_27Ijf wrl 2013_05_27
Ijf wrl 2013_05_27
 
Intrigue til the Last Race
Intrigue til the Last RaceIntrigue til the Last Race
Intrigue til the Last Race
 
Englis f1 origin
Englis f1 originEnglis f1 origin
Englis f1 origin
 
WKF Ranking: infos and rules on Rules 2016
WKF Ranking: infos and rules on Rules 2016WKF Ranking: infos and rules on Rules 2016
WKF Ranking: infos and rules on Rules 2016
 
Englis f1 origin
Englis f1 originEnglis f1 origin
Englis f1 origin
 
Englis f1 origin
Englis f1 originEnglis f1 origin
Englis f1 origin
 
Ff12020
Ff12020Ff12020
Ff12020
 
Karate 1 premier-league__2022
Karate 1 premier-league__2022Karate 1 premier-league__2022
Karate 1 premier-league__2022
 
Ff12018
Ff12018Ff12018
Ff12018
 
CCGC Newsletter April 2013
CCGC Newsletter April 2013CCGC Newsletter April 2013
CCGC Newsletter April 2013
 
Ff12019
Ff12019Ff12019
Ff12019
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...anjaliyadav012327
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room servicediscovermytutordmt
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptxThe byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptxShobhayan Kirtania
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...Sapna Thakur
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
JAPAN: ORGANISATION OF PMDA, PHARMACEUTICAL LAWS & REGULATIONS, TYPES OF REGI...
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptxThe byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 

Rankings determination- Golf and Tennis presentation

  • 1. An Overview of Tennis and Golf World Ranking Systems (Men’s and Women’s)
  • 2. A sports ranking classification system is a system that analyzes the results of sports matches to provide rankings for players or teams of a particular league or competition. Rankings are arranged in an ordinal fashion, with the highest rank person or team earning the #1 rank, the second highest the #2 rank, and so on.
  • 3.  In some sports, like tennis and golf, the ranking system is used to determine qualification for entry and seeding in tournaments.  In other sports, like American college basketball and football, the ranking system is used to determine opportunities to participate in post-season competitions, and also seeding and home-team advantage within the tournament.
  • 4. The system of determining national and international rankings for tennis and golf have developed over a number of years to deal with changes in the light of conflicts between amateur and professional tours, the commercial viability of tournaments and prize money allocation.
  • 5.  Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) formed in 1972 as a kind of union for male players, and a year later introduced its own computerized ranking system, which is recognized today as the standard “official” system.  The Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) formed in 1973 and soon created a similar ranking system based on a multi-tiered structure of tournaments.
  • 6. Since the 70s, there have been numerous changes to both ranking systems, as oversights were made apparent and changes made to account for the massive growth in tennis globally and commercially.
  • 7. The four Grand Slams (controlled by the ITF) are worth the most ranking points (winners get 2000 points), followed by the ATP World Tour events, split into the ATP World Tour Finals (1100-1500 points), the nine ATP World Tour Masters 1000 tournaments (1000 points).  The eleven ATP World Tour 500 series competitions (500 points).  The forty ATP World Tour 250 series competitions (250 points).  Next are the ATP Challenger (75-125 points) and then ITF Futures tournaments (17-33 points). 
  • 8. Rankings are determined by taking the total from the best 18 tournaments (19 if a player qualifies for the Masters’ Cup) from which the player earned the most points from the previous 52 weeks.
  • 9. Points by Round Futures ATP World Tour 250 Challengers ATP World Tour 500 Masters 1000 Grand Slam Winner 35 125 250 500 1000 2000 Finals 20 75 150 300 600 1200 Semifinals 10 45 90 180 360 720 Quarterfinals 4 25 45 90 180 360 Round of 16 1 10 20 45 90 180 Round of 32 12 20 45 90 Round of 64 10 25 45 10 10 16 25 Round of 128 Qualifying 5 5 10
  • 10. Singles Playoff Round Playoff Round 1st Round Loss 1st Round 1st Round Quarterfinals Quarterfinals Semifinals Semifinals Finals Finals Finals Win per Match Loss per Match Team Bonus Performance Bonus Wins Cumulative Playoff Round 5 Loss per Match Team Bonus Wins Cumulative 10 1st Round Loss 10 10 1st Round 10 40 40 65 65 70 70 75 40 80 145 210 280 350 425 500 75 75 Doubles Win per Match 125 625 50 50 Quaterfinals 80 130 Semifinals 90 220 Finals 95 315 Winners 95 35 350
  • 11.  The WTA structure also looked different before and after 2009.  Below the Grand Slam events, the women’s tour used to comprise Tier I and II events, which are now divided into three classes of Premier event, and Tier III and IV events, which are now called International tournaments.
  • 12. Like the ATP, it prioritizes and offers most points for its four Grand Slam events (winners get 2000 points), but has a different system of mandatory and optional events below this.  The top women must play four of its Premier Mandatory tournaments (1000 points), as well as the end-of-season Tour Championships (1500 points) and at least two of the Premier 5 tournaments (900 points).  They make up their remaining points from a choice of ten Premier tournaments (470 points) and 31 International (280 points) tournaments. Below this are the numerous smaller ITF tournaments (12-150 points). 
  • 13. Points by Round Winner Finals Semifinals Quarterfin als Round of 16 Round of 32 Round of 64 Round of 128 Qualifier Round Robin Match Round Robin Win ITF Circuit Events International Events Premier 600,700 Premier 5 Tournament of WTA Champions Championships Majors Premier Mandatory 150 110 280 200 470 320 900 620 1000 700 375 255 1500 1050 2000 1400 80 130 200 395 450 180 690 900 40 70 120 225 250 500 20 30 60 125 140 280 1 15 40 70 80 160 1 1 1 50 100 5 5 30 60 6 10 12 30 25 70 35 160
  • 14.  Initially, the rankings were calculated by a total point score over a three-year period, with a system that added more weight to recent results.  In 1989, this system was replaced by one that better rewarded quality over quantity, and did not in effect discriminate against older golfers who tended to play fewer tournaments.
  • 15. Alongside the four Majors (winners get 100 points), are the World Golf Championship (WGC) tournaments (avg. 70-80 points) and regular tour events.  Of the leading nine professional tours, the PGA and European tours offer the most points (minimum 24 points).  Next is the Japan Golf Tour and the PGA Tour of Australasia (16 points).  Then Sunshine, Asian and Nationwide Tours (14 points).  And lastly, Challenge Tour (12 points) and the Canadian Tour (6 points). 
  • 16. Total Ranking with Points Canadian Tour Challenge Tour Asian/Sunshine/Web.com Japan/Australasia Asian Tour PGA/European BMW Championship Players Championship Major Championships 1 6 12 14 16 20 24 64 80 100 2 3.6 7.2 8.4 9.6 12 14.4 38.4 48 60 3 2.4 4.8 5.6 6.4 8 9.6 25.6 32 40 4 1.8 3.6 4.2 4.8 6 7.2 19.2 24 30 5 1.44 2.88 3.36 3.84 4.8 5.76 15.36 19.2 24 6 1.2 2.4 2.8 3.2 4 4.8 12.8 16 20 7 2.16 2.52 2.88 3.6 4.32 11.52 14.4 18 8 1.92 2.24 2.56 3.2 3.84 10.24 12.8 16 9 1.8 2.1 2.4 3 3.6 9.6 12 15 10 1.68 1.96 2.24 2.8 3.36 8.96 11.2 14 11 1.56 1.82 2.08 2.6 3.21 8.32 10.4 13 12 1.44 1.68 1.92 2.4 2.88 7.68 9.6 12 13 1.32 1.56 1.76 2.2 2.64 7.04 8.8 11 14 1.2 1.44 1.6 2 2.4 6.4 8 10 15 1.32 1.52 1.9 2.28 6.08 7.6 9.5 16 1.2 1.44 1.8 2.16 5.76 7.2 9 17 1.36 1.7 2.04 5.44 6.8 8.5 18 1.28 1.6 1.92 5.12 6.4 8 19 1.2 1.5 1.8 4.8 6 7.5 1.4 1.68 4.48 5.6 7 20
  • 17.  An official ranking system for women’s golf was devised in 2004 at the World Congress of Women’s Golf, but was not instigated until 2006.  The system is similar to the men’s, in that a player’s average score over a two-year period is considered, with most recent tournaments being more heavily weighted.
  • 18. Total Ranking with Points Future Tour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 7.2 4.8 3.6 2.88 2.4 2.16 1.92 1.8 1.68 1.56 1.44 1.32 1.2 Australian LPGA Korea LPGA 14 8.4 5.6 4.2 3.36 2.8 2.52 2.24 2.1 1.96 1.82 1.68 1.56 1.44 1.32 1.2 LPGA of Japan 16 9.6 6.4 4.8 3.84 3.2 2.88 2.56 2.4 2.24 2.08 1.92 1.76 1.6 1.52 1.44 1.36 1.28 1.2 20 12 8 6 4.8 4 3.6 3.2 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 Ladies European Tour LPGA Tour 24 14.4 9.6 7.2 5.76 4.8 4.32 3.84 3.6 3.36 3.21 2.88 2.64 2.4 2.28 2.16 2.04 1.92 1.8 1.68 Major Championships 60 30 28.5 26 24.5 23 21.5 20 18.5 17 15.5 14 12.5 11 9.5 8 6.5 5 3.5 2 100 60 40 30 24 20 18 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7
  • 19. Overall, professional tennis players and golfers recognize the value of the ranking system, and are always at the forefront of changes made to their respective systems.  Governing bodies consult players when deciding on potential changes, and are open to suggestions to ensure a suitable balance between fairness and striving to maximize growth in their sports. 