Last year Open Data Manchester held two workshops one in Berlin and the other in Manchester to explore whether cooperative structures could enable the creation of open data and personal data stores for mutual benefit. The idea of the mutual came out of an ongoing conversation between people within the cooperative movement and the open data world about the role of cooperatives, and the possibility that they could rebalance what many perceive as asymmetric relationship between data subjects (people with personal data) and data users (people who use data to develop services and products). This presentation covers some of the points discussed
5. We generate data we
have little or no power
over
OpenData
Manchester
“to open all municipal data so Google can use
it to become everyone’s perfect personal
assistant - an invisible entity that knows what
you want before you do.”
Google’s wish...
Margo Georgiadis - President of the Americas, Google - Chicago
Metropolitan Planning Council 2013
7. OpenData
Manchester
Facebook implied market capitalisation per
record between 2006 - 2012 = $40 - $300
OECD - Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of
Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value, 2013
The value of data
8. OpenData
Manchester
Facebook implied market capitalisation per
record between 2006 - 2012 = $40 - $300
OECD - Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of
Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value, 2013
The value of data
• Street address $0.50
• Date of birth $2.00
• Drivers license $3.00
• Social security number $8.00
• Military record $35.00
Buying data:
9. The birth of Personal
Information Management
Services (PIMS)
OpenData
Manchester
Decision support
services
Personal data
management and life
management services
£5 billion
£11.5 billion
1.2% UK economy
Ctrl Shift - Personal Information Management Services - An analysis
of an emerging market, 2014
Value of PIMS
16. Building consent
OpenData
Manchester
A data cooperative should maintain an agreed
ethical position in order to maintain consent
Challenging in a multi-stakeholder
environment or at scale
Novel ways of building consent
20. OpenData
Manchester
Summary
1. are owned by their membership and should be more accountable;
2. have the potential to halt the over collection of data;
3. can create value for the membership;
4. can form around single issues or scale with many data subjects;
5. can be representative and affect change;
6. can help the membership be more data literate;
7. can liberate data through statutory processes;
8. can encourage better data and context to be produced;
9. build trust and consent and;
10. can be created from city data as well as personal data.