9. Climate Services: Are there new opportunities for US to deliver climate services better? Opportunities for regional/national initiatives or leadership? How will this affect NOAA Research (OAR), the National Sea Grant Program and national budgeting priorities?
11. Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation (PIE) Develop and deliver high quality programming and information for users Plan strategic investments in science and education Accountability as measured against performance measures, outcomes and impacts. Strive for continuous improvement and responsiveness
21. Evaluation (PIE) Annual Review Recommendations Site Visit Review Decertification 4 years - 2010 Performance Review Rating 4 years - 2011
22. Performance Review Panels and Merit Rating 2011 Annual Reviews Site Visit Review Program Summary Assess overall impact on society from both an environmental and socioeconomic perspective based on our four year plan. How well did the we achieve our stated outcomes, objectives and performance measures???
30. Perf. Measure/Outcome Highlights 17 SCD: Increase number economists and social scientists involved in state spatial planning processes advisors and employees ($400% from 0 to 4) HRCC: Percentage of coastal counties that implement plans to adapt to hazards (70% increase, 5 counties) SSS: Percentage of fishermen trained in at sea genetic stock identification techniques (50% increase, 50 trained fishermen) HCE: Percentage of Oregon coastal communities that utilize OSG watershed health and water resource planning tools (35% increase, 12 coastal communities)
31. Network Activities - 2009 Nancee Hunter - Serves on Exec. Comm. on Sea Grant Education Network; Co-Chair of West Coast Governor’s Agreement on Ocean Health (Ocean Literacy Action Coordination Team) Joe Cone – Member of HRCC Focus Team, National Climate Steering Committee (and Communicators liaison for both) Evelyn Paret - Chair of SG Fiscal Officers Network, Member of SGA Network Advisory Committee and Program Mission Committee Rasmussen/Brandt - Lead of West Coast Regional Marine Research Planning effort Stephen Brandt- Appointed Chair on Oregon State University Marine Council; State of Oregon Scientific & Tech Advisory Committee; and Oregon Nearshore Legislative Task Force. Named to Oregon Coast Aquarium Board
32. Highlights of Metrics 19 Volunteer hours: 7,359 [Oregon value @ $17.90 per hour =$131,726] Total Students supported: 53 (includes 2 state fellows) 12,000 student attendees (K-12) participated in Sea Grant marine education programs, camps, lab & activities and 174 (K-12) educators attended SG professional development sessions 5950 people participated in133 SG sponsored extension workshops 5003 people attended 84 public extension outreach presentations 54 publications produced 150,000 visitors to the Visitor Center in 2009. Donation record set.
33. Best Management Practices 20 Strong integration of Extension, Research, Education and Communications elements into the program and operational components of Sea Grant. Active advisory council, leadership team. Involving extension, education, and communications in proposal selection process. Program funds dispersed only to projects the meet the high standards of our competitive process. Rigorous recruitment, competition and selection processes for our several fellowships, and scholarships Coordinating regional RFP involving other SG programs. Regional Research Planning effort directly linked to the West Coast Regional Ocean Governance SG Education linkage with Oregon Coast Aquarium, K-12 Ed, HMSC, VC, Lincoln Co. schools Innovative and effective community engagement. Maintaining role as a trusted broker with all stakeholders. Building an maintaining robust and long term partnerships. Integration of social and economic sciences into Sea Grant, state, and regional efforts Expanding opportunities through outside funding
34. October 5 – 6, 2010 Every 4 years 5 members Federal Program Officer Sea Grant Director Advisory Bd Two others 1.5 days only Meet with programs management team, Advisory council, stakeholders and OSU administration Oregon Sea Grant Site Visit
35. Site Visits Evaluation focus is on: Approach to Management and Organization Scope & success of engagement with stakeholders Collaboration with other Sea Grant and external partners Not intended to assess impacts Briefing Book NO LONGER THAN 20 pages OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
36. Site Visits Particular Interest In: Involvement of Partners Omnibus proposal development process Balance and integration of research, outreach and education Stakeholder support and engagement Collaboration with other Sea Grant programs Directors engagement with the program, host university and the advisory board OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
43. Overview of the Nearshore Research Task Force OPAC January 29, 2010 Dr. Stephen B. Brandt
44. HB 3106 Passed June 2009, effective July 1, 2009 Identified 7 specific positional members and 7 representative slots for community appointees Overarching Purpose – create a Task Force on Nearshore Research to make recommendationson “a long-term funding and coordination strategy for implementing the nearshore priorities of the state.”
45. Notes about HB 3106 Conceived by Rep Roblan and others to address the needs for coordinated and trusted nearshore research in Oregon, specifically: How to use data and science to inform Oregon in moving forward Trusted protocols for data collection and use of data and science in decisions Process for data transparency, credibility and sharing Effective collaboration and use of existing resources Consider the need for a long-term nearshore organization Systems for public involvement in research and decisions Long-term research funding strategy Recommendations for legislation due no later than August 1, 2010 Task Force will be repealed January 2012
46. Membership - Agencies/Institutions Gil Sylvia - Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station Craig Young - Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Stephen Brandt - Oregon Sea Grant Caren Braby - Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (MRP) Bob Bailey - DLCD Ocean & Coastal Services Division Onno Husing - Oregon Coastal Zone Management Association Jeff Kroft - Department of State Lands
47. Membership - Community Terry Thompson - local government Sybil Ackerman - conservation/environmental Mike Lane - commercial fishing industry Frank Warrens - sport fishing industry Leesa Cobb - community-based fishing Laura Anderson - nearshore industry (non-fishing) Gus Gates - recreation (non-fishing) federal non-voting Cathy Tortorici – NOAA Roy Lowe – USFWS
48. NRTF Structure Elected Chair and Vice Chair (Brandt/Ackerman) Operations Team (Brandt, Ackerman, Braby, Sylvia) Public Participation Non-member staff Jenna Borberg, Oregon Sea Grant Fellow in the Governor’s Office Julie Risien, Oregon Sea Grant Carol Cole, COMES Andy Lanier, DLCD Contractors (TBD) Funds administered though COMES at OSU
49. Strategy Consider key documents, that consolidate and anticipate nearshore priorities Identify funding needs Determine transparent procedures and oversight to secure and administer public and private funds Identify mechanisms for data sharing and coordination among institutions and stakeholders Oregon Territorial Sea Plan
50. Meeting Schedule (tentative) December 2-3, 2009 – Newport January 21-22, 2010 – Newport February 18, 2010 - Newport March 29, 2010 - TBD May 3, 2010 - TBD June 10-11, 2010 - TBD July 22-23, 2010 - TBD
51. Progress to Date Elected a Chair, Vice Chair and established an Operations Team Established a system for public involvement (meeting testimony, list-serve, website, outreach events) Received over $150k to operate Detailed review of existing nearshore priorities and planning documents Examined Oregon’s current ocean and coastal research and management structure Review and discussion of several statewide and regional science models for nearshore research and information (WA, CA, RI, MA, NZ)
61. Nearshore Task ForceWhat does this mean for you? New way for the state to integrate marine science into policy, management, education and outreach New funding mechanism(s)
72. OSU Marine Council What does this mean to you? What is the next “Action Issue’? Single point of contact for major marine sciences issues Integration across OSU campus Formal way to get involved in OSU approach to these issues Sea Grant Leadership - Who’s on first!
85. Directors Goals for 2010 Success for Oct 5 -6 site review Progress on Alignment Selection of Extension and Other leadership Staffing plan Integration with OSU – Marine Council Integration within state – STAC, Nearshore Task Force, Coastal Trip etc Integration regionally (something national)??
86. Directors Goals for 2010 Administrative integration – then programmatic One Sea Grant Fill 3 advisory Council seats New Grants competition Program development and Growth ‘ gap analysis’?
100. What is Oregon Sea Grant? Mission is to develop and support an integrated program of research, outreach, and education that helps people understand, rationally use, and conserve marine and coastal resources. Our activities respond to the needs of ocean stakeholders and act to stimulate the Oregon economy. OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
101.
102. Grow the program capabilities OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
106. Neutrality (ability to bring broad range of partners together without taking positions on issues – our role is as trusted broker) OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
110. Strong evaluation – adaptive and constantly improving methods of research selection, education, communication and community engagement. OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
111. University Interests and Priorities National , Regional, State Priorities Stakeholder Needs Oregon Sea Grant Experience, Knowledge, And Capabilities
112. Program Growth – Where? How can we take advantage of our strengths/leadership in areas such as the social sciences, renewable energy? Are there critical gaps in expertise e.g. Climate? Columbia River? What is our #1 Programmatic priority? OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
113. BIG Ideas What should OSG strive to accomplish? Think About: How can we apply the unique integrated capabilities of Sea Grant? What trends will shape our future? What challenges or opportunities will we face? If we all put our efforts together, how can we help the people of this state and beyond? What one topic would we spend a new $500k- $1M on? OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
114. Program Growth – How? Action Coordination Teams New initiatives Integrated Proposals for Program Development OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
115. What can you do to help? TALK TO US Be involved Action Coordination Teams with OSG and OSU Partnerships New ideas Proposal Development Integration OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
119. Oregon Sea Grant Education: Formal & Free-choice Communications Extension Program Development and Partnerships Research
120. Criteria for Setting Priorities Primarily Statewide and regional needs Through assessment workshops and surveys Regional Research and Information Needs report Citizens Advisory Council Alignment with National Sea Grant and NOAA priorities OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
125. A Sea Grant and Advisory Council review to examine projectsocietal relevance and recommend project elements to improve relevance, transition of results to the public; and impact
129. Eight member Science Panel to evaluate proposals largely for scientific excellence
130. Advisory Council to rate societal relevance of top ranked proposals. OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
131. Research Proposal ReviewsTimeline Preliminary proposals due: February 6 Invitations for full proposals: March 6 Full proposals due: May 8 Peer review period: May 9 to July 30 Reviews to investigators: July 31 Investigator responses to reviews due: August 7 Science Panel meeting: August 12 – 13 Advisory Council meeting: August 20 – 21 Notice of funding decisions: September 4 Successful projects begin: Feb 1, 2010 OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon
132. Research Proposal ReviewsSummary We received 63 preliminary proposals by 58 different investigators from 6 different Oregon institutions. We encouraged 30 to submit full proposals. We received 31 Full Proposals by 30 different investigators from six different institutions. Sea Grant Cost Share Preliminary Proposal total request: $9.77M $2.63M Full Proposal total request: $5.65M $1.81M OREGON SEA GRANT Coastal Science Serving Oregon