Raw translation for “Strategi, Doktrin, Postur Pertahanan Negara” (or “Strategy, Doctrine, of National Defense Posture”) written by National Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) Brigadier General Budiman in 2008. This English Translation is for Educational & Non-Commercial Purposes Only.

1. Strategy,
Doctrine
of
National
Defense
Posture
English Translation of “Strategy, Doctrine of National Defense Posture” by
Indonesian Armed Forces Brigadier General Budiman.
“Strategi, Doktrin, Postur Pertahanan Negara” (Brigjen TNI Budiman)
terjemahan ke dalam Bahasa Inggris
07 June 2013
Raw Translation for Educational & Non-Commercial Purposes Only

2. Parivartin
&
Indonesia
As part of Parvartin’s ongoing research project, we regularly review and
translate numerous military and defense documents pertaining to the
Republic of Indonesia. Our sources are all strictly publically available and
published documents from the likes of RAND to the Indonesian
Government.
Indonesia is the third largest democracy and largest country among
ASEAN. To help bring more scholarship and better promote Indonesia, we
are freely provide raw translation of the documents we use for our
research.
We believe this will help promote scholarship and thinking of what will be
an ever increasingly important country in the South-East Asian region.

3. Translation
of
“Strategi,
Doktrin
Postur
Pertahanan
Negara”
The English translated presentation here provided is for “Strategi, Doktrin,
Postur Pertahanan Negara” (or “Strategy, Doctrine, of National Defense
Posture”) written by National Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) Brigadier
General Budiman in 2008.
This is only a raw translation and is to be distributed free of charge for
educational and non-commercial purposes only. All copyrighted content
translated belong to that of their respective copyright holders and not
Parivartin.
Please contact Mail@Parivartin.com for any questions or inquiries.

4. Parivartin explores the impact of major global trends on organizations
from nation-states and political parties to multi-national corporations and
communities.
Global trends that we explore include Demographic Transition, Energy,
Raise of the Rest, Climate Change, Science and Technology Studies (STS),
and more.
Learn more at http://Parivartin.com
The principal of Parivartin, Daniel Riveong, is the lead analyst for
Parivartin. He is based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

6. • FENOMENA GLOBAL
• ISU TERORISME
• ISU SENJATA PEMUSNAH MASSAL
• ISU KELANGKAAN ENERGI
• DAMPAK PEMANASAN GLOBAL
• BENCANA ALAM
• GLOBAL PHENOMENON
• TERRORISM ISSUE
• WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION ISSUE
• ENERGY SCARCITY ISSUE
• GLOBAL WARMING EFFECT
• NATURAL DISASTER
• INTER RELASI PERKEMBANGAN GLOBAL DAN REGIONAL
• KONFLIK EKSTERNAL DAN INTERNAL DI KAWASAN
• KEAMANAN MARITIM
• KEAMANAN DIRGANTARA
• GLOBAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERRELATION
• EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CONFLICT IN REGION
• MARITIME SECURITY
• AEROSPACE SECURITY

7. MEXICO
USA
CANADA
Southe
Africe
PPHILIPPIN
ESMALAYSIA
SINGAPORE
INDONESIA
USA
POP : 298.444.134
GDI : US$ 13.500 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 582 B
(3,7 % GDI)
Soldier: 2,17 million
personel
RUSSIA
POP : 142.069.309
GDI : US$ 1,8 T
DEF BDGT : US$ 30 B
(1,6 % GDI)
Soldier :
JAPAN
POP : 127.463.244
GDI : US$ 4.560 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 41,1 B
(0,9 % GDI)
Soldier: 148.000 Personil
USA
BRAZIL
RUSSIA
China
Japan
AUSTRALIA
NEW ZEALAND
POP : 4.076,461
GDI : US $ 105 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 1,31 B (%
GDI)
Soldier : 9.041 thousand
personel
CHINA
POP : 1.313.313.812
GDI : US$ 2.620 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 35,3 B
(1,6 % GDI)
Soldier : 1,6 million
personel
EUROPEAN UNION (NATO
excluding
USA & Canada)
POP : 356.330.000
GDI US$ 10.200 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 188,5 B
(1,4 % GDI)
Soldier : 354 thousand personel
INDIA
POP : 1.111.713.388 GDI
: US$ 839 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 22.3 B (2,6 %
GDI)
Soldier : 1,1 million personel
INDIA
AUSTRALIA
POP : 20.264.437
GDI : US$ 749 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 15,1 B (2 % GDI)
Soldier : 26.035 personel
NEW ZEALAND

8. POWER MAP OF SOUTHEAST ASIA
MEKSIKO
AS
KANADA
AS
AFSEL
PHILIPPINES
INDONESIA
BRUNEI
POP : 0,38 million
GDI : US$ 6 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 0,35
B (5,8 % GDI)
MALAYSIA
POP : 25 million
GDI : US$ 143 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 3,08
B (2,2 % GDI)
INDONESIA
POP : 231 million
GDI : US$ 420B
DEF BDGT : US$
3,5B (0,9 % GDI)
PHILIPPINES
POP : 89,5 million
GDI : US$ 118 B
DEF BDGT : US$
0,9B (0,7% GDI)
SINGAPORE
POP : 4,5 million
GDI : US$ 132 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 10
B (7,6%GDI)
LAOS VIETNAM
POP : 6,368 million POP : 84,5 million
: US$ 2,9 B GDI : US$ 61,1B
DEF BDGT : US$ 3,4
B (5,5 % GDI)
CAMBODIA
POP : 13,8 million
GDI : US$ 6,6B
DEF BDGT : US$ 0,123
B (1,9 %GDI)
GDI
DEF BDGT : US$ 0,014
B (0,4 % GDI)
THAILAND
POP : 65 million
GDI : US$ 207B
DEF BDGT : US$
2,1B (1,01% GDI)
MYANMAR
POP : 47 million
GDI : US$ 75 B
DEF BDGT : US$ 6,2
B (8,2 %GDI)
B : BILLION

9. Y BORDER AND OUTER ISLANDS ISSUE
Y SEPARATISM ISSUE
Y TERORISM ISSUE
Y COMMUNAL CONFLICT ISSUE
Y ANARCHISTS RADICALISM ISSUE
Y POLITIC ISSUE
Y REGIONAL AUTONOMY
Y NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Y REGION LAYOUT
Y GLOBALIZATION EFFECT REACHING REMOTE POPULATION
Y AFFIRMATION OF IDENTITY
Y PROBLEMS OF POVERTY, IGNORANCE, BACKWARDNESS &
INJUSTICE
Y NATURAL DISASTER

10. • MILITARY AGGRESION
• BORDER VIOLATION
• SEPARATISM MOVEMENT
• ARMED REBELLION
• SECURING VITAL NATIONAL OBJECTS OF STRATEGIC
VALUE
• TERORISM THREAT
• MARITIME & AEROSPACE SECURITY PROBLEM
• COMMUNAL CONFLICT
DIMENSIONS
• IDEOLOGY
• POLITIC
• ECONOMY
• SOCIAL CULTURAL
• INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY
• PUBLIC SAFETY

11. NATIONAL
DEFENSE
DOCTRINE
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
STRATEGY
GUIDING ENDS
WHAT TO DEFEND?
(NATION SOVEREIGNTY, REGION
INTEGRITY & NATION SAFETY AS STATED
IN 5 SAS-STRUCTURAL, ANALYTIC,
SYNTHETIC STRATEGIES)
MEANS
DEFEND BY WHAT?
(INTEGRATED MILITARY AND NON
MILITARY DEFENSE WHICH IS EMBODIED
IN NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE)
WAYS
HOW TO DEFEND?
(LAYERED DEFENSE STRATEGY)

12. D ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEFENSE TO AVERT ALL THREAT &
DISTURBANCE WHICH ENDANGER NATION SOVEREIGNTY, REGION
INTEGRITY OF INDONESIAN REPUBLIC & SAFETY OF ALL
INDONESIAN PEOPLE
D ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEFENSE TO DEAL WITH WAR AND
MILITARY AGGRESION FROM FOREIGN NATION
D ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEFENSE TO HANDLE MILITARY
THREATS WHICH INTERRUPT THE EXISTENCE & INTERESTS OF
INDONESIAN REPUBLIC
D ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEFENSE TO HANDLE NON MILITARY
THREATS WHICH AFFECT NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, REGION
INTEGRITY OF INDONESIAN REPUBLIC & SAFETY OF ALL
INDONESIAN PEOPLE
D ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEFENSE TO ACTUALIZE GLOBALPEACE
& REGIONAL STABILITY

13. TOTAL DEFENCE
(national defense system)
NON MILITARY DEFENSE
( national resources )
MILITARY DEFENSE
(Indonesian Army)
NonMilitary Defense Force
Civil Defense
Other Than WarWAR
. public security
. disaster management
. humanitarian
operations
. social
. economic
. psychological defense
. Technology.
. Reserve component
. Support component
1. Handle separatist
2. Handle rebel
3. Handle terrorism
4. Secure borders
5. Secure vital strategic objects
6. Secure flight/sailing
7. Secure president/ vice
president
8. Help government in national
development
9. Help local government
10. Help police
11. Help securing state guest
12. Disaster relief
13. Search And Rescue
operations
14. Peace keeping

14. 3 2 15 4
NATURAL/ARTIFICIAL RESOURCES
& Facilities/Infrastructure
Industry
Other citizens
Expert/
Professional :
• Doctor
• Paramedic
• Mechanic
• Chemist
• .etc
National Guard:
• Police (Mobile Brigade)
• Civil Service Police
• Public protection
• Security officer
• Regiment Student
• Youth organizations
• Martial Arts organizations
• Political Party Security Officer
• etc
RESERVE COMPONENT
SUPPORT COMPONENT
MAIN
COMPONENT
STRONG
DEFENSE
ORGANIZING

15. LAYERED DEFENSE
DETERRENCE
HANDLING MILITARY THREAT
HANDLING NON MILITARY
THREAT
GENERAL
CONCEPT
OF
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
STRATEGY

16. Threat
Global
Regional
Nasional
Provinsial
Lokal
LATAR BELAKANG
LAND IDIIL
LAND YURIDIS
LAND HISTORIS
LAND VISIONAL
Deterrence
Layered
defense
Facing
non
military
threat
Facing
military
threat
General concept
Political Instrument
Economic Instrument
Psychological Instrument
Technology Instrument
Military Instrument
Denial
ReprisalDeterrence
Deterrence basic principles
Strategy choice
Deterrence Strategy Form
Facing
military
threat
Facing
non
military
threat
Deterrence Strategy Approach
Scope & Essence of National Defense Cooperation
Global Peace & Regional Stability
Defense Cooridantion Paradigm
Non Military defense
capability target
Military defense capability Target
Main development of National Defense
Capability
Global Peace & Defense Coordination
Facing non military threat
Military defense
Non Military defense
Diplomatic Layer
Spontaneous civil resistance
Military defense layer
Drawn out war defense layer
• Area garrison
• Separatism
• Armed rebel
• Sabotage
• Espionage
• Terrorism
Intelligence Capability
Defense capability
Security capability
Support capability
Local government capability
Natural resources development
Artificial resources development
Facility & Infrastructure development
Physical factor development
Deterrence instrument
Facing military threat
National Defense
Capability Development
Ideology
base
Cons8tu8onal
base
Juridical
base
Historical
base
Visional
base
Conceptual
base
Doctrinal
base
Global
Regional
Na8onal
Provincial
local

17. NATIONAL DEFENSE DOCTRINE
Doctrinal base of
National Defense Plan
which must be
understood & become
guide in accordance
with each task &
functions

18. A TEACHING ABOUT FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL
DEFENSE BELIEVED AS TRUE, DUG OUT OF THE NATION’S STRUGGLE &
LESSON LEARNED FROM PAST EXPERIENCE TO BE DEVELOPED TO MATCH
DEFENSE TASK REQUIREMENTS IN DYNAMICS OF STRATEGIC SCOPE
AND PACKED WITHIN NATIONAL INTEREST LAYOUT.
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
DOCTRINE
FUNCTION
TO
ACTUALIZE
UNIVERSAL
DEFENSE
SYSTEM
BOTH
IN
PEACE
AND
AT
WAR
AS BASIC INSTRUMENT IN DEVELOPING ALL
DOCTRINES RELATED TO NATIONAL DEFENSE
BASIC DOCTRINE, MAIN DOCTRINE, IMPLEMENTATION DOCTRINE
AS FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE BELIEVED AS TRUE AND A GUIDE IN
IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL DEFENSE THUS DEVELOPED FROM
INDONESIAN VALUES AND NORMS WHICH ARE BINDING,
BECOMING : IDEOLOGY, CONSTITUTIONAL, JURIDICAL, HISTORIC,
VISIONAL & CONCEPTUAL BASE
NATURE,
POSITION
&
BASE

19. NATURE
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
DOCTRINE
NATIONAL STRUGGLE
- NATION IDENTITY
- STRUGGLING NATURE
- NATION’S IDEALISM
- NATIONAL PURPOSE
- NATIONAL INTERESTS
BACKGROUND OF
RATIONALE :
- IDEOLOGY BASE
- JURIDICAL BASE
- HISTORICAL BASE
- CONCEP TUAL
BASE
National Defense
Conception
PEACE WAY
WAR WAY
POWER CENTRAL
PEACE PRINCIPLES
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
SYSTEM
Military Defense
Non military defense
DETERRENCE
Face Military threat
TTEAM OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT
POSTURE
THREAT
- MILITARY
- NON
MILITARY
Instrumen Politik
Instrumen Ekonomi
Instrumen Psikologi
Instrumen Teknologi
Instrumen Militer
Military defense posture
Non military defense posture
National defense intelligence
Defense logistic
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
STRATEGY
PEOPLE’S WAR
• Aggression
• Non aggression
• Face non military threat
• Actualize global peace
& regional stability
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
President
Minister of Defense
Non department government bodies
Military commander
DEFENSE MANAGEMENT
PURPOSE
FUNCTION
PEACE & WAR
VIEW
CONFLICT SPECTRUM
DOKTRIN HANNEG
UNIVERSAL
PROTECT INDONESIA
DEFEND SOVEREIGNTY
WAR PRINCIPLES
WEAPONRY SYSTEM
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
POWER &
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL
GUIDANCE

20. Perceptive
(Conceptual)
* Concept & Principles
of Peace & War
* Doctrine
* Concept of thought
Implementation
Complete
(Physic)
* Power number & quality
* Weaponry system
* Collective work
* Readiness
* Support of resources
Reliable
(Morale)
* Leadership
* Management
* Motivation

21. MAIN CONDITION OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
• WHILE ESTABLISHING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT STILL EMPHASIZE ON
PROSPERITY ASPECT AS PRIORITY.
• TECHNOLOGY IN BOTH AMOUNT AND CONTENT OF MAIN EQUIPMENT AND WEAPON SYSTEM
IS STILL A CONCERN, EVEN UNDER DETERRENCE STANDARD, HUMAN RESOURCE QUALITY
AND THEIR PROSPERITY IS ALSO INADEQUATE.
• THE NEED TO FULFILL, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, AND SPAREPART OF MAIN EQUIPMENT AND
WEAPONRY SYSTEM FOR SOLDIER STILL DEPENDS ON OTHER COUNTRIES.
CHALLENGES
• BUILD DEFENSE POWER HIGHER THAN MINIMUM DEFENSE STANDARD, TO
GAIN DETTERENCE EFFECT
• POTENSTIAL THREAT: TERORISM, COMUNNAL CONFLICT, TRANS-
NATIONAL CRIME, AND CRIME AGAINST STATE’S WEALTH ESPECIALLY ON
MARITIME JURIDICAL TERRITORY OF INDONESIA & BORDER AREAS.
LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION OF NATIONAL DEFENSE
• DEFENSE BUILD WHICH INCLUDE DEFENSE SYSTEM AND STRATEGY, POSTURE
AND STRUCTURE, SOLIDER PROFESSIONALISM, TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT
• DIRECTED FOR CONTUNIOUS EFFORT TO ACTUALIZE DEFENSE CAPABILITY
HIGHER THAN MINIMUM DEFENSE STANDARD

22. MAIN LAYOUT OF NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE
• STATE’S DEFENSE POSTURE WHICH IS
DEVELOPED TO ACTUALIZE UNIVERSAL
DEFENSE SYSTEM, INTEGRATED MILITARY
DEFENSE POSTURE AND NON MILITARY
DEFENSE.
• BUILD CAPABILITY BASED DEFENCE WHICH
INTEGRATES HARD-POWER AND SOFT-POWER
MILITARY DEFENSE
• NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE REFLECTS
INDONESIA DEFENSE CAPABILITY WITH
STANDARD DETERENCE WHICH IS HIGHER
THAN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL FORCE.
• STATE’S CAPABILITY TOALLOCATE DEFENSE
BUDGET WITHOUT DISTURBING THE BALANCE
OF DEVELOPED SECTORS AS A WHOLE.
BLUEPRINTOFFUTURENATIONALDEFENSEPOSTURE

23. BLUEPRINT OF FUTURE NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE
LAYOUT OF NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE
• STATE’S DEFENSE POSTURE WHICH IS DEVELOPED TO ACTUALIZE
UNIVERSAL DEFENSE SYSTEM, INTEGRATED MILITARY DEFENSE
POSTURE AND NON MILITARY DEFENSE.
• BUILD CAPABILITY BASED DEFENCE WHICH INTEGRATES HARD-POWER
AND SOFT-POWER MILITARY DEFENSE
• NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE REFLECTS INDONESIA DEFENSE
CAPABILITY WITH STANDARD DETERENCE WHICH IS HIGHER THAN
MINIMUM ESSENTIAL FORCE.
• STARE’S CAPABILITY TOALLOCATE DEFENSE BUDGET WITHOUT
DISTURBING THE BALANCE OF DEVELOPED SECTORS AS A WHOLE.

24. DEFENSE POWER
DEPLYMENT 2007
BLUEPRINT OF FUTURE
DEFENSE POSTURE
MILITARY DEFENSE
NON MILITARY
DEFENSE
POSTURE DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Military defense power
Military deployment in 2007
• Reserve component
• Supporting component
Personnel
regional force
Supporting force
National defense general condition
Existing challenges
Long term defense development direction
Defense posture main layout
Defnese posture strategy plan
Puan Han Mil
Power
Intelligence capability
Defense capability
Security capability
Support capabilities
Organization
Army force
Support force
MEWS Dev
• Base
• Marine force
• Base
• Fasharkan
LONG TERM DEFENSE
DEVELOPMENT
Deployment
Non military defense capability
Non military defense deployment
Reserve component
Support component
Diplomacy capability
Economy capability
Social capability
Morale capability
Reserve component
support component
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have
enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been
corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If
Phase I : 2010 - 2014
Phase II : 2015 - 2019
Phase I : 2020 - 2024
Phase I : 2024 - 2029
SOLDIER LIFE GUARANTEE PROJECTION
IN 2029
Salary • Housing
Health service • Pension
Ra8onale
Ideology
base
Cons8tu8onal
base
Juridical
base
Historical
base
Conceptual
base
Doctrinal
base
D
E
F
E
N
S
E
P
O
S
T
U
R
E
Defense
capability
Power
military postur e dev.
Nonmilitary posture dev.
military postur e dev.
Nonmilitary posture dev
military postur e dev.
Nonmilitary posture dev.
military postur e dev.
Nonmilitary posture dev.

25. BUDGET IS THE LIMIT FACTOR
NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE DESIGN
YEAR 2010 1,90% GDI INCREASE 3,90%
NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET IN 2029 STAY BELOW
EDUCATION BUDGET
NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE BUDGET
¢ ALLOCATE 30% OF DEFENSE BUDGET FOR
MAINTENANCE, DEVELOPMENT OPERATION AND
DEPLOYMENT OF FORCES
¢ 40% OF DEFENSE BUDGET FOR SALARY & SOLDIER’S
WELL BEING
¢ 30% OF DEFENSE BUDGET FOR MAIN EQUIPMENT AND
WEAPONRY SYSTEM , MAIN COMPONENT, RESERVE
COMPONENT & DEVELOPMENT

26. TARGET OF 40% SHIFT 35%, 30%, 25% AND 20% MAJOR
RANKED SOLDIER SALARY 4 TIMES MONTHLY INCOME
PER CAPITA. EARNINGS & WEALTH REDUCED FROM
40% TO 35%SO THAT MAIN EQUIPMENT AND WEAPONRY
(MEWI) INCREASE 30% TO 35%
MAJOR RANKED SALARY REACH 12 MILLION IDR
(PRESENT VALUE) EARNINGS & WEALTH DECREASE 35%
THUS 30% MEWS INCREASE 35% REACHING 40%
MAJOR RANKED SALARY REACH 18 MILLION IDR
(PRESENT VALUE) EARNINGS & WEALTH DECREASE
30% THUS 25% MEWS INCREASE 40%
MAJOR RANKED SALARY REACH 25 MILLION IDR
(PRESENT VALUE) EARNINGS & WEALTH DECREASE
25% THUS 20% MEWS INCREASE 50%
GRADUAL
SHIFTING
OF
DEFENSE
BUDGET
ALLOCATION

27. INCREASE NATIONAL
DEFENSE CAPABILITY TO
MINIMIZE RISK & THREAT
INCREASE QUALITY OF BIN*
CAPABILITY & BAIS TNI* &
OTHER INTELLIGENCE UNIT
SINERGICALLY
FACE MILITARY & NON
MILITARY THREAT
ESTABLISHMENT
OF
NATIONAL
DEFENSE
POSTURE

28. AS SOLE EXECUTER ON AEROSPACE
DEFENSE GIVEN FULL AUTHORITY
AS ANTICIPATION FOR
GLOBALIZATION WHICH IS LOADED
WITH TECHNOLOGY & INFORMATIONI
AS NEUTRALIZING POWER
AGAINST THREAT :
LAND LAND
LAND AIR
LAND SEA
SEA SEA
AIR AIR

29. • KOSTRAD
• KOPASSUS
• SUPPORTING POWER
• REGIONAL POWER
• MEWS DEVELOPMENT
• MILITARY BASE
ORGANIZATION MARINE ;
SSAT :
• WARSHIP
• NAVY SHIP
• AIRCRAFT
• MARINE
• BASE
• FASHARKAN
POWER
• SQUADRON
• RADAR UNIT
• GUIDED MISSILE UNIT
• SPECIAL FORCES
• AIR BASE
• DETACHEMENT
• POST
AIR FORCE
ARMY

30. POWER
• RESERVE COMPONENT
• SUPPORTING COMPONENT
CAPABILITY
• DIPLOMACY
• ECONOMY
• SOCIAL
• MORALE
TITLE
• RESERVE COMPONENT
• SUPPORTING COMPONENT

31. INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITY
DEFENSE CAPABILITY
SECURITY CAPABILITY
SUPPORT CAPABILITY
REGION EMPOWERMENT CAPABILITY
CAPABILITY

32. POWER
DEPLOYMENT
BASED ON INTEGRATED TRI-SERVICE FORCE
TITLES OF GROUND FORCES
• KOPASSSUS DEPLOYMENT
• KOSTRAD DEPLOYMENT
• DEPLOY REGIONAL ARMY FORCE
• DEPLOY CENTRAL EXECUTIVE AGENCY
NAVAL FORCES DEPLOYMENT
• PERMANENT DEPLOY
• COMBAT DEPLOYMENT
AIR FORCE POWER DEPLOYMENT
• AIR DEFENSE DEPLOYMENT
• AIR COMBAT DEPLOYMENT
• ALKI SECURITY DEPLOYMENT
• CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT
• LOGISTIC SUPPORT DEPLOYMENT
SSAT

33. COMPARING PERCENTAGE OFGDI SINCE YEAR
2001 TO 2008 DECREASE YEAR 2001 1,05%,
WHILE ON YEAR 2008 0,78%
NOMINALLY NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET
INCREASE BUT ITS PERCENTAGE OF BOTH GDI
AND STATE BUDGET KEPT DECREASING FROM
YEAR 2001 TO 2008
NOMINAL INCREASE APPLIED FOR PERSONNEL
EXPENDITURE, WHILE CAPITAL EXPENSE WAS
VERY LITTLE, THUS IT MADE INSIGNIFICANT
EFFECT TO MODERNIZE NATIONAL DEFENSE
POWER (MEWS)

34. PHASE I: 2010-2014.
REALIZING SECURE AND PEACEFUL CONTITION ON SEVERAL AREAS WHICH GET BETTER BY
INCREASING BASIC CAPABILITY OF STAE’S DEFENSE MARKED WITH INCREASING OF POSTURE
CAPABILITY ANDSTATE’S DEFENSE STRUCTURE
PHASE II: 2015-2019
ACTUALIZED PROFESSIONALISM OF STATES DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND INCREASE OF
SOLDIERS WELL BEING ALONG WITH MEWS AVAILABILITY THROUGH DOMESTIC DEFENSE
INDUSTRY EMPOWERING
PHASE III: 2020-2024
ACTUALIZING PROFESSIONAL ARMED FORCE WITH STRONG RESERVE AND SUPPORT
COMPONENT, ACTUALIZING WORKING SYNERGY IN ASPECT OF EFFECTIVE SECURITY,
INTELLIGENCE, AND COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE EQUIPPED WITH RELIABLE DEFENSE INDUSTRY
CAPABILITY
PHASE IV: 2024-2029.
ACTUALIZING PROFESSIONAL ARMED FORCES, HIGH PROSPERITY SOLDIERS, MODERN
DEFENSE INDUSTRY CAPABILITY, COMPLETE AND ORGANIZED RESERVE COMPONENT, AND
ORGANIZED SUPPORTING COMPONENT

35. NATIONAL DEFENSE POSTURE CAN ONLY BE ACTUALIZED BY
SUFFICIENT BUDGET GDI 1,95% TO 3,95% OF GDI
NATIONAL DEFENSE POWER WILL HARDLY REACH ENOUGH
REQUIREMENT TO DEFEND THE NATION ON DETERRENCE LEVEL
DECREASING OF DETERRENCE MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR
INCOMINGTHREAT, AGGRESSION, INVASION, AND BORDER
VIOLATION.
BARGAINING POSITION OF INDONESIA AS A NATION IN
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION WILL CONTINUE TO DROP.
ENDANGERED NATIONAL INTERESTS TO UPHOLD INDONESIAN
REPUBLIC BASEDON PANCASILA DAN BASIC LAW OF 1945.
UNGUARANTED CONTINUITY AND SECURITY OF CONTINUOUS
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.