Why & how is it that international laws & international bodies & international public figures paid to maintain peaceful co-existence keep silent while even endorsing repeated NATO bombings that have killed thousands of innocent men, women & children & destroyed public & private property in a show of supremacy & arrogance over the nations they have targeted? NATO war crimes extend from Yugoslavia, to Iraq, to Afghanistan & now Libya. Why are international laws being manipulated to pressurize nations politically less powerful yet bountiful in natural resources or placed in influential economic routes? This simply explains why nations are invaded in the present context & how NATO has become above the law.

1. UN member States must demand probe & action against NATO War Crimes
Why & how is it that international laws & international bodies & international
public figures paid to maintain peaceful co-existence keep silent while even
endorsing repeated NATO bombings that have killed thousands of innocent men,
women & children & destroyed public & private property in a show of supremacy
& arrogance over the nations they have targeted? NATO war crimes extend from
Yugoslavia, to Iraq, to Afghanistan & now Libya. Why are international laws being
manipulated to pressurize nations politically less powerful yet bountiful in natural
resources or placed in influential economic routes? This simply explains why
nations are invaded in the present context & how NATO has become above the
law.
Were there terrorists in power plants, electricity grids, water supply networks?
Were there terrorists among shops, universities & schools, stores, hospitals,
farms & markets? These have been key targets of NATO in its endless bombing
campaigns which totally violate its own Charter & the UN Charter. So if Justice is
quiet what is the use of the International Criminal Court at The Hague? If the ICC
is a tool, a manipulative organism that twists legal principles it is time the rest of
the world knew about these duplicities, ambiguities & double standards &
demand that it either stops the double standards or these members vote for
another alternative.
NATO in Yugoslavia
The International War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia formed in 1993
was only a means to justify Western intervention in the Balkans. It has no links to
the International Court of Justice based in The Hague. The Tribunal is made up
of US influenced appointees so will NATO crimes in Kosovo be investigated?
Was it a surprise when the Tribunal branded President Milosevic a war criminal &
the US is against the establishment of any international court that can charge US
military & political personnel with war crimes?
What NATO is accused of is violating the UN Charter– it is a violation to attack a
sovereign nation that was innocent of any aggression. NATO’s Charter Article 1
& 7 has also been violated – NATO is supposed to function as a “DEFENSIVE
organization, & only committed to force if ONE or MORE of its members are
attacked! NATO Treaty in fact recognizes the UN Security Council to maintain
international peace & security. NATO’s violation of the Hague Convention Article
22 & 23, Geneva Convention Article 19, Nuremberg Principle VI a,b,c & the US
Constitution Article 1 Section 8, Clause II is for “killing & injuring a defenseless
population through Yugoslavia”.

2. The usual excuse is given as “humanitarian” intervention & that was what the
Clinton administration used, incidentally Mussolini used it to invade Ethiopia to
save them from slavery & Hitler used it to occupy Sudetenland to save Germans.
If the US used the Nuremberg principles to charge Germany for “starting an
unprovoked war” shouldn’t the US be charged on similar grounds?
On 22 September, 2000 in the District Court of Belgrade, the President of the
Court handed down guilty verdicts against government leaders of NATO
countries for “war crimes”. These defendants were Bill Clinton, Tony Blair,
Jacques Chirac, Gerhard Schroeder,
! "# $ %&
! ' ( $ $
! ( $
$ $ $
$ ' ) !(
Slobodan Milosevic, President of Yugoslavia between March 24 & June
10, 1999.
Former US President Bill Clinton was sent a verdict on April 18th, 2001
sentencing him in absentia to 20 years in prison for “crimes against civilians”.
The entire West is not as inhuman as we think. The Commission of Inquiry of the
International Action Coalition charged in 1999 Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright,
William Cohen for violating the Geneva Convention, the UN Charter, the
Nuremberg Principles, Helsinki Accords & the US Constitution. The 19 charges
included starting a war, deliberate targeting of civilians infrastructure & violating &
destroying peacemaking role of the UN. One of the main arguments was that
despite the Yugoslav parliament agreeing to NATOs demand of autonomy &
armed UN peacekeepers in Kosovo why it was bombed! Instead of the mass
graves that was similar to the WMD in Iraq, there were perhaps just 200 dead
persons – the 100,000 dead Albanians that NATO & US were promoting as
grounds to attack was just a lie.
NATOs air strikes in Serbia killed over 2000 civilians & wounded more than 7500.
NATO has owned up to only 460 civilian deaths. The dead included farmers, city
dwellers, reporters, diplomats, people traveling in public transport, patients in
hospitals, the elderly & even children. That is the human factor – what about the
enormous damages to the environment as a result of these NATO bombings –
poisoning water supplies, loss of electricity that affects hospitals & other
emergency requirements? There is evidence that some Spanish pilots refused to
drop bombs on non-military targets.

3. Another accusation against NATO was the bombing of all bridges across the
international waterway through Eastern Europe – the River Danube. Some of
these bridges were bombed while civilians were on them. All that NATO leaders
said were that the incidents were “accidents”. This clearly violates the Protocol
Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12th August 1949 & the Protection of
Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1) – 8th June 1977.
NATO strategy was to destroy the whole infrastructure of Yugoslavia – that was
why it targeted public services, rail & road networks, waterways. The objective
was always to detach Kosovo.
If one were to read the book (The White Book) published by the Yugoslav
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, NATO crimes in Yugoslavia, the book will reveal the
damage caused by NATO bombings & lists 400 civilian deaths & over 40
incidents involving civilian fatalities.
If NATOs actions were illegal under its own treaty, in particular since aggressive
military action was taken without UN mandate the killings that ensued were war
crimes.
What is clear is that the US & UK Governments deliberately waged war against
Yugoslavia by building a propaganda campaign that would be internationally
welcomed & accepted by their countrymen.
On 5th January 2000, Yugoslav Government stepped up pressure to indict NATO
country leaders – US President Bill Clinton & UK Prime Minister Tony Blair for
crimes against humanity in Yugoslavia in 1999. This followed a submission for
instigating proceeds before the International Court of Justice in April 29, 1999 &
ICC setting a deadline for legal action on 30th June 1999 & Yugoslavia meeting
that deadline on 5th January 2000. “
!
" # $ %&''
( ( )
*

4. NATO war crimes in Iraq
The Geneva Conventions are clear “Civilians shall not be the object of attack."
According to the UN Security Council resolution, military forces were tasked with
expelling Iraqi forces that invaded Kuwait. That task involved 88,000 tons of
bombs that killed civilians & killed more civilians through the destruction of power
grids, food, water treatment, sewage systems. US soldiers used napalm to
incinerate entrenched Iraqi soldiers. US soldiers dropped fuel-air explosives,
cluster bombs that use razor-sharp fragments to shred people. Depleted uranium
were used to penetrate tanks causing long term health hazards, the economic
embargoes have killed as many as 1million Iraqis.
Why did the US & its allies deliberately destroy Iraq’s water supply & not repair
it? Why did these western nations repeatedly bomb infrastructures for flood
control, municipal & industrial water storage, communication towers, irrigation &
hydroelectric power? (8 multi purpose dams, 7 major pumping stations, 31
municipal water & sewage facilities were destroyed). These have nothing to do
with Saddam or his supporters – these are services needed for the people of
Iraq.
They were bombed to create – waterborne diseases which have killed thousands
of Iraqi civilians & the bombs & weapons used have caused radiation poisoning
as a result of depleted uranium shells.
Article 54 of the Geneva Convention states “it is prohibited to attack, destroy or
render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population” –
including foodstuff, livestock & drinking water supplies & irrigation works”.
Why were these acts not treated as war crimes under the Geneva
Convention & does this not constitute genocide by US & allies?
NATO war crimes in Afghanistan
If NATO has committed war crimes in Iraq & Yugoslavia, should we be surprised
to read of NATO war crimes in Afghanistan? Indiscriminate bombings killing
unarmed civilians have only been answered with an “apology” by NATO. The
presence of US & NATO troops in Afghanistan was similar to that which took
place in Yugoslavia – without any proof a country has been taken over.
Indiscriminate bombings mean rebuilding projects being handed over to profit-
driven private corporations. The irony is that the Afghan government are
compromising the welfare of its own citizens for its own financial benefits. This
has caused a rise in Pashtun nationalism & indirect support for the Taliban. Thus
it has been easy to pass blame for NATO killings on the Taliban while civilian
!

5. deaths keep piling, infrastructure continues to be bombed & anarchy prevails
throughout Afghanistan.
NATO in Libya
NATO’s Libya operation followed the UNSC Resolution which NATO has violated
seen through its presence on ground, bombing of civilian structures. Greatest
violation is by NATO taking sides which is illegal, illegal too is the murder or
attempt to murder government officials with no formal declaration of war. NATO
is also using cluster bombs & depleted uranium which is also illegal. NATOs
violations in Libya are many & what we would like to know is why is the ICC
silent?
In the case of Libya, the ICC has no jurisdiction for Libya never ratified the Rome
Treaty nor has the US. However, under international laws a Head of State has
immunity. So if ICC does not question the US & its crimes against humanity why
should ICC question Libya when the UN Security Council cannot refer to the ICC
according to its Statute? ICC has been considering action against Georgia since
2008, against Guinea since 2009 & against Colombia since 2006 but the ICC
took just 3 days to find Libya guilty.
The NATO countries participating in air strikes in Libya include France, UK, US,
Canada, Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands & Italy. What excuse does NATO have
for bombing a Downs Syndrome School, the University of Tripoli, the man-made
waterway irrigation system which supplies most Libyans with drinking water,
bombing a hospital killing over 50 many of whom were children, bombing villages
killing civilian population – is this not genocide & can the ICC continue to watch
doing nothing?
The sinister campaign to take over Libya was by first projecting to Gaddafi that
the US “deeply valued the relationship between the United States & Libya”
(2009) This was because British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, Halliburton, Chevron,
Conoco, Marathon Oil & industrial giants like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Dow
Chemical & Fluor signed investments & sales deals with Libya. The US State
Dept awarded a $1.5m grant to train Libyan civilian & government security forces
in 2009. Many of these “trainees” are now leading the NATO-backed “rebel
forces”.
Thus, the pretence of being a “friend” to Gaddafi by the US since 2009 was to get
Gaddafi to agree to allow foreign presence in Libya.
"

6. For months now NATO has been pounding Libya. Over 30,000 air & missile
assaults on mostly civilian infrastructure was expected so too was the “rebel
uprising” for they had been already trained to rise against Gaddafi. NATO also
bombed Libyan airports, ships, energy depots, ports & highways, warehouses,
hospitals, waterplants & civilian homes. NATO was able to garner diplomatic
support inclusive of the Arab League, NATO took services of hired mercenaries
in Qatar. Libyan assets were frozen amounting billions of dollars. Economic
sanctions were imposed by NATO cutting off Libya’s income from oil sales.
International media also controlled by western imperialists were relaying images
that portrayed rebels waving rifles & shouting against Gaddafi. These rebels
entered towns that had been devastated by NATO air attacks! What these rebels
did was to rob homes, banks & destroy public institutions on the instructions of
NATO. Going against Gaddafi does not equate to ruining infrastructure &
destroying property that is used by one’s own people!
NATO wanted Libya to be destroyed. Like NATO destroyed Yugoslavia & Iraq.
NATO wanted to ensure Libya had to be “reconstructed” because all these
contracts would eventually go to profit-making western companies!
Incidentally, Libya is a country that had boasted the highest per capita income &
standard of living in Africa.
What took place in Libya is a message from the imperialists for other nations in
North Africa, Asia & Latin America. US-NATO are already engaged in colonial
wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen & Somalia. What about the fall of
Mubarak of Egypt & Ben Ali in Tunisia while uprisings in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia,
Yemen, Morocco, Algeria were all associated with movements demanding end to
EU-US & Israeli domination of the region & would have caught their intelligence
by surprise.
NATO provided the money to silence the “people’s march to democracy” & the
situation in Egypt is far worse than during Mubaraks reign! In Bahrain the West
called for “reform” while continuing to arm the Bahraini royal family as seen in the
NATO backed Saudi invasion of Bahrain to support the royal dictatorship. In
Yemen, the West continued to support the Ali Saleh regime. Nevertheless, NATO
is apparently providing support to Islamic fundamentalists in a move to overthrow
Bashar Al-Assad.
What did Libya do to anger the West? Did the West not like its pursuance of pro-
African agenda which had funded an independent regional bank &
communications system designed to bypass IMF & World Bank control?
#

7. What has ensued is that like in Iraq & Afghanistan there is likely to be a
dominating US-NATO present that is looking towards a military offensive in Iran
& Syria. Sub-Saharan Africa may like to remember Gaddafi’s generous aid,
grants & loans that helped these nations from IMF, World Bank. Who will
remember Gaddafi’s development programs, construction projects that offered
many jobs to sub-Saharan African immigrant workers. Despite all these
maneuvers, China is still bracing ahead over its western counterparts.
July 22, 2011 is the date when NATO hit the Libyan water supply pipeline. Days
later NATO hit the pipeline factory producing pipes to repair it. Both incidents
could not have been accidents. NATO went on to target civilian water supply
network that supplied water to 70% of Libyan population. Nevertheless, the truth
will emerge just like Libya is now revealing how it funded French President
Sarkozy’s election campaign & the numerous secret meetings Tony Blair held
with Gaddafi & there must surely be more in the Pandora’s box which is why the
West is in a haste to bump of Gaddafi as they did to Osama & Saddam – all
previous friends of the West.
It is certainly time that UN member states stood up against aggression by
Western neo-imperialism. Member states must demand a probe into all the
atrocities by NATO & demand that these nations steering NATO be charged with
war crimes. Russia & China need to champion this cause.
With only 28 nations making up the NATO alliance, the UN has 53 African
member nations & 48 Middle-East & Asian nations & 12 nations in South
America. It is opportune for these non-NATO members to make a voice within
the UN & demand that NATO be investigated for all of its war crimes & be
charged for every war crime committed.
Shenali Waduge