1. World's Worst Evaluators
Original Concept by:
Steve Howard, ACG
and
Mark D’Silva, ATM-S
Presented by:
ATM-G Raju Mandhyan
and
ATM-S Khris Albano
1
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati
11/17/13

2. The Extra Terrestrial
 Does
not know what the speech
was all about.
 Has no idea whatsoever of the
objectives to be achieved
 Talks about out of the world issues,
gossip, etc.
 Ends up using valuable time and space
during a meeting.
 Needs to be “beamed back by Scottie.”
2
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

3. The Editor
 Is
an advanced, high-class Nit-Picker
 Evaluates only language, forgets the
whole package of the presentation
 Primarily puts forward own literary
views unknown to anyone
 Speaker gets de-motivated because of
the narrow perspective.
3
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

4. The Critic
 Fault
finding machine for Substance,
Structure and Style
 Appreciates nothing, offers no STGOs.
 Effect (not intent)
Speaker’s selfesteem goes to the dogs
 Critics are self-absorbed, they don’t
realize they are being so negative
4
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

5. The Uni-Curist
 Has
one kind of cure/feedback for all
presentations
 Generally makes comments about
– Eye contact without explaining the benefits
thereof
– Body language for the sake of talking about
body language
– Etc;
 Adds
little new learning for the speaker.
5
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

6. Mr. Nice Guy
 Has
nothing but praise for every
aspect of the presentation
 Omits STGO’s because emphasis is
on praise only
 Is liberal with words like “fantastic,”
“fabulous,” “superb,” until they
become meaningless
 Comes across as shallow and
insincere
6
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

7. The Star
Treats
Speaker’s performance
as secondary
Uses evaluation to promote Self
Overkills with personal skills
Uses inane techniques, gimmicks +
lot of drama.
Provides little constructive feedback
7
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

8. The Sleaze-ball
 Gushes
over appearance of speaker
 Hardly pays attention to what is said
because he/she is so captivated by
looks alone
 Most suggestions are about
improvement of appearance and looks
 Ends up annoying the speaker
8
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

9. How To Be a Bad Evaluator
 Evaluate
as if you were E.T
 Edit as if you were Shakespeare
 Criticize speaker until he shrinks to death
 Provide one set of solutions for all kinds of
problems
 Flatter the speaker till her head floats in fatty
poo
 Smile, gush and constantly talk about yourself
until everyone leaves the room
 Slurp, lick and suck-up to the speaker till he/she
wants you to be padlocked in a pub.
9
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

10. How Not to be a Bad Evaluator
 Have
fair knowledge of the principles of Public
Speaking
 Read and know objectives of speech project
 Listen actively, objectively and with a goal to
improve presentation and help speaker
 Shortlist suggestions and praise speech and
performance highlight
 Chuck out own ego and own bias
 Be genuine, gentle and giving towards the
speaker
 Keep feedback short, sweet and well structured
10
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

11. Ultimate Purpose is to…
Coach
the Speaker
to Improve
11
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13

12. World's Best Evaluators
Presented By:
ATM-G Raju Mandhyan
and
ATM-S Khris Albano
12
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati
11/17/13