2. Why small group collaboration?
Research shows that it has positive
effects on learning
As long as there are:
– Shared goals
– Individual accountability
2
3. Why small group collaboration?
Transmission teaching styles have
reduced:
–
–
Quality
Quantity of student discussion
Sometimes, groupwork might not
profit student learning (depending
on the type of talk in the groups).
3
4. This unit will help you to:
List characteristics of discussions
that benefit learning
Recognise teacher concerns
Understand techniques for
promoting effective discussion
Understand the teacher’s role in
discussion management
Plan discussion based lessons
4
5. A. Experiencing a discussion
Read problem 4 on handout 1
individually and write down your
own response for it
Work as a group, compare your
responses and try to refine your
answers until you feel you have
reached a consensus
5
6. Some points for reflection
Did you find it helpful to have a chance
to think about the question yourself
before it was discussed in your group?
How far did you really think together, or
did you tend to follow independent lines
of thought?
6
7. Some points for reflection
Did someone 'take over'? Was someone
a 'passenger'?
Did you listen to, share ideas with and
consider the alternative views of
everyone in the group?
7
8. Some points for reflection
Did you build on each others' ideas to
construct chains of coherent reasoning?
Did you feel able to share your ideas
without fear of embarrassment of being
wrong? Did anyone feel uncomfortable
or threatened? If so, why?
8
9. Some points for reflection
Did your discussion stay 'on task' or were you
'wandering'?
9
10. Some points for reflection
What are the implications of this idea for
your classroom?
10
11. Some points for reflection
Most of the problems do not have one
‘definitive’ answer.
Students must think for themselves first.
– Quick thinking and confident students are
more likely to dominate discussion.
11
12. Types of student talk
Working in a group
VS
Working as a group
What’s the difference?
12
13. Types of student talk
(Mercer 1995,2000)
Disputational talk – This consists of
disagreement and individualised
decision making. It is characterised
by short exchanges consisting of
assertions and counter-assertions.
NOT BENEFICIAL
13
14. Types of student talk
(Mercer 1995,2000)
Cumulative talk – speakers build
positively and uncritically on what
each other has said. This is typically
characterised by repetitions,
confirmations and elaborations.
NOT BENEFICIAL
14
15. Types of student talk
(Mercer 1995,2000)
Exploratory talk – Speakers work on
and elaborate each other’s
reasoning in a collaborative
atmosphere. Enables reasoning to
become audible and knowledge
becomes publicly accountable.
Characterised by critical and
constructive exchanges.
Challenges are justified and
alternative ideas are offered.
15