13. RESULTS 1. WATER ANALYSIS PARAMETERS: EC, Calcium, Magnesium, Available Na + , Bicarbonates, Available Na + , SAR, Chloride 2. SOIL ANALYSIS PARAMETERS: EC, pH, SAR
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51. Figure 3: Showing monthly variation of sodium in water at JDW Sugar Mills (Pvt.) Limited
52. Figure 3: Showing monthly variation of sodium in water at JDW Sugar Mills (Pvt.) Limited
53. Figure 4: Showing Monthly variation of Bi-carbonate in water at JDW Sugar Mills.
54. EC at 6” EC at 12” EC at 18” EC at 24” EC at 30” EC at 36” EC at 48” Figure 15: Graph showing monthly depth wise (6” – 48”) EC comparison in soil samples taken from JDW Sugar Mills effluent sites. Depth wise Figure 15: Graph showing monthly depth wise (6” – 48”) EC comparison in soil samples taken from JDW Sugar Mills effluent sites.
55. Figure 5: Showing monthly variation of sodium absorption ratio (SAR) in water at JDW Sugar Mills.
56. Figure 6: Showing monthly variation of Chloride in water at JDW Sugar Mills.
57. Figure 7: Showing monthly variation of EC in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
58. Figure 8: Showing monthly variation of Ca++, Mg++ in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
59. Figure 9: Showing monthly variation of Chlorides in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
60. Figure 10: Showing Monthly variation of sodium in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
61. Figure 11: Showing monthly variation of SAR in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
62. Figure 12: Showing monthly variation of Bi-carbonates in water at Humza Sugar Mills.
63. Figure 13: Showing monthly variation of overall Parameters in water at United Sugar Mills.
64. Figure 14: Showing monthly variation of overall water Parameters at Ettehad Sugar Mills.
65. Figure 15: Graph showing monthly depth wise (6” – 48”) EC comparison in soil samples taken from JDW Sugar Mills effluent sites.
![RYK. AT A GLANCE ,[object Object]]()