5. Am I too old Who can open the doors Blow this for a game of soldiers I have no identity Apprentices & Skills Where do I belong I see no future Can anyone help How do I get off benefits This is depressing
17. Benefits - ‘Provide More for Less’ Traditional versus Collaborative 7% Construction Cost Saving 85% saving on overspend 9-13% saving on fees Potential claim varies typically 5% The difference in the cost of procurement and construction using the Collaborative, Managed Frameworks such as NWCH as opposed to Traditional 3 4 2 5 £/m Construction Cost Construction Cost Overspend Overspend Fees Fees Contractual Claim Collaborative Traditional
18. ‘ Provide More for Less’ Local Spend – Case Study Benefits 88-89% 11-12% Spend outside of AGMA It has been demonstrated that by procuring construction work through collaborative arrangements, such as NWCH frameworks, it is possible for the vast majority of the project spend to remain within the sub region Case Study West Gorton New Build Housing, £23m with Framework Partners GB Building Solutions and Bramall Construction Spend within Greater Manchester Sub Region (AGMA) 38% Spend within Manchester City boundary
19.
20. Framework benefits Benefits 9% Saving on project costs 10-15% Time savings 1-2% Capital cost savings – result of not tendering
24. Headline News “ Of £357m procurement spend across the top 300 MCC suppliers 86.5% is spent in Greater Manchester. Furthermore, 25p in every £1 is re-spent by our suppliers on employees, products or services within the city region.” Benefits
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30. A franchise Sub regional lots Promote sub regional engagement & ownership Encourage participation from sub regional contractors Generic model for framework management