2. PLCs at Work: Practical Implications of
the December Session
LaVette Ford, Dawn Singleton, Seth Brown, and Thomas Feller
3. Purpose and Objectives
Today, principals will:
…better understand the Dufour training
attended by administrators and ICs on
December 14-15, 2011;
…identify practical suggestions for the
implementation of PLCs at their respective
schools
4. Most slides are taken from the
handout from the Triangle High
Five Regional Partnership
training, December 14-15, 2011,
held in Raleigh, NC. Training
originally conducted by Dr. Rick
and Becky DuFour.
5. Assumption #1: Teachers Matter
Regardless of the research basis, it is clear
that effective teachers have a profound
impact on student achievement and
ineffective teachers do not. In fact,
ineffective teachers might actually
impede the learning of their students
(Marzano 2003, p 75)
6. Assumption #2: Schools Matter
An analysis of research conducted over a
thirty-five year period demonstrates that
schools that are highly effective produce
results that almost entirely overcome the
affects of student backgrounds.
(Marzano 2003)
8. Definition of a PLC
In the context of school improvement, Professional Learning
Communities (PLCs) shift the focus of school reform from
restructuring to reculturing. The PLC concept often is misused or
implied to describe a committee or any weekly meeting in which the
participants undertake data-based decision making. However, a PLC
is much more than that. It is an ongoing process used to
establish a schoolwide culture that is based on a
fundamental belief in building teacher leadership in
school improvement efforts. Through participation in PLCs,
teachers enhance their leadership capacity as they work as members
of ongoing, high-performing, collaborative teams that focus on
improving student learning.
- The Center for Comprehensive School Reform & Improvement
9. The Crux of Work in a PLC
The heart of work in a PLC is when educators
collectively analyze evidence of student learning to:
Inform individual professional practice
Improve a team’s ability to achieve its SMART
goals
Intervene on behalf of individual students
The other steps on the PLC journey are
designed to help teams engage in this
essential work.
10. Professional Learning
Communities
Are they based on…
Adherence to core principals OR individual
autonomy?
Strong administrative leadership OR teacher
empowerment?
Recognition and celebration of current efforts
and achievements OR discontent with the status
quo?
Approaching school improvement with a sense of
urgency OR demonstrating the patience to
sustain an improvement initiative over the long
haul?
11. The Tyranny of “or”
vs. the Genius of “and”
The tyranny of “or” is the rational view that cannot
easily accept paradox, cannot live with two seemingly
contradictory forces at the same time. It must be A
or B, but not both.
The genius of “and” is to embrace both of the extremes
at the same time. This is not just a question of
balance. Balance implies 50-50, going to the mid-
point. Visionary leaders did not seek the gray
of balance, but were determined to be
distinctly both A and B at the same time.
-Jim Collins & Jerry Porras
12. Simultaneous Loose AND
Tight School Cultures
Simultaneous loose and tight cultures establish
clear parameters and priorities that enable
individuals to work within established
boundaries in a creative and autonomous way.
They are characterized by “directed
empowerment” or what Marzano and Waters
refer to as “defined autonomy” – freedom to
act and to lead within clearly articulated
boundaries.
13. Group Discussion
Share with a partner how you create a
simultaneously loose and tight school
culture at your school. Give a specific
example.
15. Results-Oriented Goals:
Keys to Effective Teams
Leaders foster effective teams when they help
teams establish specific, measurable, results-
oriented, performance goals. Promoting teams
for the sake of teams or focusing on team-
building exercises does little to improve the
effectiveness of the organization.
“There is nothing more important than each
member’s commitment to common purpose and
a related performance goal to which the group
holds itself jointly accountable.”
– Katzenbach & Smith, 1999
16. SMART Goals (Chapter 6)
Strategic and specific
Measurable
Attainable
Results-Oriented
Time-Bound
- Conzemius & O’Neill (2000)
17. At your table, discuss which of the
following are SMART Goals?
Strategically aligned with the school-wide
goal of improving student achievement,
by the end of this school year we will:
18. At your table, discuss which of the
following are SMART Goals?
Develop & administer at least six common
assessments.
Implement the Common Core State
Standards in 100% of our classrooms.
Increase the percentage of students
achieving and exceeding the target score
(80% or higher) on each strand of our end-
of-year assessment from 81% to 90%
19. Importance of Short-Term
SMART Goals
People can become so caught up in big dreams that
they don’t manage the current reality. Short-
term gains are needed to establish
credibility for a change initiative over the
long haul. Major change takes time. Zealots
will stay the course no matter what. Most of us
want to see some convincing evidence that
all the effort is paying off. Nonbelievers have
even higher standards of proof. We want clear
data indicating changes are working.
-John P Kotter (1996), p118-119
21. Team Learning Process
1. Clarify 8-10 Essential Common Outcomes
(skills, concepts, and dispositions) per
semester by course/content area;
2. Develop multiple Common Formulative
Assessments for each course/content
area by team
22. Common Formative Assessments
(Chapter 3)
Common formative assessments are the
lynchpin of the collaborative team
process in a PLC.
At your table, complete the following:
“Common” assessment means…
“Formative” assessment means…
23. Why Common Assessments?
Efficiency – by sharing the load, teachers
save time
Fairness – promotes common goals,
similar pacing, and consistent standards for
assessing student proficiency
Effective Monitoring – provides timely
evidence of whether the guaranteed and
viable curriculum is being taught and
learned
24. Why Common Assessments?
Informs individual teacher practice – provides
teachers with a basis of comparison regarding the
achievement of their students so they can see
strengths and weaknesses of their teaching
Team capacity – collaborative teacher teams are
able to identify and address problem areas in their
program
Collective response – helps teams and the school
create timely, systematic interventions and
enrichment for students.
25. Why Common Assessments?
Common formative assessments provide
the most powerful stimulus for changing
adult practice.
To change schools we must change
adult practice.
26. Keys to Formative Assessments
To determine if an assessment is formative ask the
following questions:
1. Is it used to identify students who are
experiencing difficulty in their learning?
2. Are students who are having difficulty provided
with additional time and support for learning?
27. Keys to Formative Assessments
3. Are students given an additional
opportunity to demonstrate their learning?
4. Do teachers use the results to inform and
improve their individual and collective
professional practice?
28. Resources to Build Valid CFAs
List of essential outcomes/pacing guides
Recommendations from assessment experts (examples:
Stiggins, Reeves, etc)
Released items from standardized tests
Websites
www.nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
www.masteryconnect.com
Data from past indicators of achievement
Methods of alternative assessments
Example Rubrics
Assessments from other high-performing teams/teachers
29. Two Essentials of
Performance Based Assessments
1. Can we agree on the criteria by which we
will judge the quality of student work?
2. Can we apply those criteria consistently
(inter-rater reliability)?
30. Team Learning Process
1. Clarify 8-10 Essential Common Outcomes (largely
done for us in the new standards)
2. Develop multiple CFAs for each course/content area
3. Establish specific target/benchmark so
rigorous it will lead to success on high stakes
assessments (SMART Goals)
4. Analyze Results
5. Identify & Implement improvement strategies
32. Informing & Impacting
Professional Practice
We must ensure all teachers receive:
Timely and frequent information on the
achievement of their students,
In meeting an agreed-upon standard,
On a valid assessment,
In comparison to others.
33. Most Powerful Strategy to
Improve Student Learning
Teachers work together in collaborative teams to:
Clarify what students must learn,
Gather evidence of student learning,
Analyze that evidence,
Identify the most powerful teaching strategies.
Reflecting teaching must be based on evidence of student learning
and reflection is the most powerful when it is collaborative
- John Hattie
34. Schools Suffer from
DRIP Syndrome
We are often
Data
Rich, but
Information
Poor
Data are not information; translating fact to understanding
means relating data to something you know and can visualize.
This typically requires comparison.
- Robert Waterman
35. Student Score
A 70
B 70
C 80
D 80
E 100
F 40
G 70
H 50
I 80
J 70
K 50
L 50
M 100
N 100
O 100
Average: 74%
Number Proficient: 7
Percent Proficient: 47%
39. Group Discussion
As a table, create a double-bubble map
identifying the similarities and differences
between a PLC meeting and a team meeting.
Be prepared to share-out at the end.
41. The Sequence of Changing
Attitudes (including your own)
Attitude is shaped by
Experience is a result of
Behavior
Attitude is seven times more difficult to
change than behavior, so start by addressing
behavior.
42. Keys to Responding to a Resister
Assume good intentions
Seek to understand
Use strategies of persuasion
Identify specific behaviors essential
to the success of the initiative
Focus on behavior, not attitude.
Monitor behavior
43. Behaving Our Way to
New Attitudes
There is a large literature demonstrating
that attitudes follow behavior. People
accept new beliefs as a result of changing
their behavior.
- Pfeffer and Sutton
44. Focus on Behavior
The central challenge and core problem of
all substantive change initiatives is
changing people’s behavior. Change
efforts must focus on what people do, and
the need for significant changes in what
people do.
- John Kotter and Dan Cohen, The Heart of Change
45. Changing Behavior
Which is most likely to persuade an educator to change?
1. Supervision and evaluation process
2. Workshops/Courses
3. A research article or book
4. Evidence of his/her skewed grade distributions
46. Persuading the Resistant Teacher
Lever 1: Concrete Evidence of Irrefutably Better Results
Nothing changes the mind like the hard cold world hitting it with
actual real-life data (Patterson, et. al)
Teachers have to feel there is some compelling reason for them to
change practice, with the best direct evidence being that students
learn better. The key to enduring change in teacher practice is
demonstrable results in terms of student achievement (Richard
Elmore, 2003)
Transparency of results creates an aura of “positive pressure” –
pressure that is actionable in that it points to solutions and
pressure that at the end of the day is inescapable (Michael Fullan,
2008)
47. Persuading the Resistant Teacher
Lever 2: Positive Peer Pressure
When seeking tools to influence, no resource
is more powerful and accessible than the
people who make up our social networks.
The approval or disapproval of our fellow
human beings can do more to assist or
destroy our change efforts than almost any
other source. (Patterson, et. al, 2008)
49. Systematic Intervention: By Name
and By Need
The most effective schools and school systems in the
world monitor and intervene at the level of the
individual student. The best systems take the process
of monitoring student learning and intervention inside
schools, constantly evaluating student performance and
constructing interventions to assist individual students
in order to prevent them from falling behind.
(Barber and Mourshed, 2007)
50. A Crucial Caution
No system of interventions can compensate for
weak and ineffective teaching.
At the same time a school is working to develop
time and support for student learning, it must
take steps to create the powerful collaborative
teams and common assessments that
contribute to adult learning.
51. Resources
http://www.allthingsplc.info (look for
“Evidence of Effectiveness”
http://www.solution-tree.com
52. Critical Corollary Questions
If we believe all kids can learn:
What is it we expect them to learn?
How will we know when they have learned it?
How will we respond when they don’t learn it?
How will we respond when they already know it?
Notas del editor
First two are teacher oriented and not student focused – they are not results orientedLast one focuses on student achievement.
First two are teacher oriented and not student focused – they are not results orientedLast one focuses on student achievement.
Last point is the difference between data and information.